Social Sciences
Social Sciences General
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attached File | 14.75 kB | Adobe PDF | ||
613.2 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
143.34 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
113.29 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
402.62 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
512.45 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
420.84 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
273.94 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
345.6 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | |||
198.42 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
213.4 kB | Adobe PDF | |||
212.37 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Adultery shows a conflict between social pressure and individual struggle for happiness. Adulterers have always suffered from society's disapproving attitude towards them. In India, adultery is criminalized under Section 497 IPC. As per criminal law in India, offence of adultery is directed only at the 'outsider' who violated the sanctity of the matrimonial home when the outsider is a man. Thus it amounts to gender based discrimination in law. In our opinion, continuance of this law in present day, demands extensive reforms and amendments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 26-29 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 01-01-2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
T1 - Adultery and the Indian law
AU - Kanchan, Tanuj
AU - Nagesh, K. R.
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - Adultery shows a conflict between social pressure and individual struggle for happiness. Adulterers have always suffered from society's disapproving attitude towards them. In India, adultery is criminalized under Section 497 IPC. As per criminal law in India, offence of adultery is directed only at the 'outsider' who violated the sanctity of the matrimonial home when the outsider is a man. Thus it amounts to gender based discrimination in law. In our opinion, continuance of this law in present day, demands extensive reforms and amendments.
AB - Adultery shows a conflict between social pressure and individual struggle for happiness. Adulterers have always suffered from society's disapproving attitude towards them. In India, adultery is criminalized under Section 497 IPC. As per criminal law in India, offence of adultery is directed only at the 'outsider' who violated the sanctity of the matrimonial home when the outsider is a man. Thus it amounts to gender based discrimination in law. In our opinion, continuance of this law in present day, demands extensive reforms and amendments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57549087742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57549087742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:57549087742
SN - 0972-0448
JO - International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine
JF - International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine
Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Indian Religions ((EIR))
45 Accesses
Adultery, sometimes found in the form of incest, is a consensual sexual act between two persons who are not in a conjugal relationship with each other. Adultery is considered sinful and wrong in Hindu traditions, so much so that it is also unlawful and criminal under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code. The Hindu Dharmaśāstras forbid any type of sexual union or act – physical, mental, or emotional – outside the socially sanctioned marriage institution (8:352) [ 1 ]. According to the Bhagavad Gītā , a “corrupt woman” destroys family values. This further leads to the destruction of the clan (1:60–62) [ 2 ]. The Manusmṛti implores the ruler to free the state from adultery, assault, theft, defamation, and violence (5:154; 8:386–387) [ 1 ].
In the Apaddharmanuśāsana Parva of Śānti Parva of the Mahābhārata (Section CLXV), there is a dialogue between Bhishma and Yudhishthira where Bhishma asserts that adultery is a major sin and recommends punishment for the one who is proven guilty...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Institutional subscriptions
Buhler G (2004) The laws of Manu. Cosmo Publications, New Delhi, pp 141–198
Google Scholar
Prabhupada ACBS (1986) Bhagavad-gita: as it is. The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, Mumbai, pp 60–62
The Mahabharata, Book 12: Santi Parva: Apaddharmanusasana Parva: Section CLXV, p 360. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12a164.htm
Hinduism and Adultery (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/h_extramarital.asp
Vatsayana (1993) The Kama Sutra of Vatsayana: the classic Hindu treatise on love and social conduct. Introduction by John W. Spellman, Penguin, London, pp x–xv
Pattanaik D (2014) Myth = Mithya: decoding Hindu mythology. Penguin UK, London
Bhaktivedanta PAC (1984) Śrīmad Bhagavatam: with the original Sanskrit text, its roman transliteration, synonyms, transl. and elaborate purports by A. C. Bhaktivedanta swami Prabhupāda. Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, New York, pp 36–38
Menon R (2006) Siva: the Siva Purana retold. Rupa, New Delhi, pp 16–36
Tiruvaḷḷuvar, Subramuniyaswami SS (2000) Tirukural. Abhinav Publications, New Delhi, p 146
World Scripture – Adultery (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.unification.net/ws/theme059.htm#16
Whitney WD, Lanman CR (1962) Atharva-Veda Saṁhitā. Harvard University, Cambridge/MA. 1905
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
College of Humanities and Social Sciences – Languages and Literature, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Amitabh Vikram Dwivedi
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Amitabh Vikram Dwivedi .
Editors and affiliations.
Department of Religion and Asian Studies, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA, USA
Jeffery D. Long
The Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, CA, USA
Rita D. Sherma
Dept of Anthropology, The University of North Texas Dept of Anthropology, Denton, TX, USA
Pankaj Jain
Jamia Millia Islamia, Centre for the Study of Comparative Reli Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Madhu Khanna
Reprints and permissions
© 2021 Springer Nature B.V.
Cite this entry.
Dwivedi, A.V. (2021). Adultery (Hinduism). In: Long, J.D., Sherma, R.D., Jain, P., Khanna, M. (eds) Hinduism and Tribal Religions. Encyclopedia of Indian Religions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1036-5_146-2
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1036-5_146-2
Received : 16 September 2019
Accepted : 28 April 2021
Published : 18 June 2021
Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN : 978-94-024-1036-5
Online ISBN : 978-94-024-1036-5
eBook Packages : Springer Reference Religion and Philosophy Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Humanities
Policies and ethics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1036-5_146-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1036-5_146-1
Chat with Paper
Content maybe subject to copyright Report
Maritus v mulier : the double picture in adultery laws from romulus to augustus, reasons for dissolution of marriages of peasants in the yaroslavl, tver and tobolsk provinces in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries.
Whatsapp contact click here, published in:.
Volume 10 Issue 5 May-2023 eISSN: 2349-5162
Unique identifier.
Published Paper ID: JETIR2305580
Registration ID: 515713
Post-publication.
Important links:.
2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
Download paper / preview article.
Preview this article, download pdf, print this page.
Impact factor calculation click here current call for paper, call for paper cilck here for more info important links:.
--> |
|
|
|
Read Next →
The author argues that family laws must broaden and take into account newer forms of marriage and relationships that defy traditional, hetero-monogamous notions.
Saumya Uma , Professor, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
This article examines the birth, life and death of the criminal law provision on adultery in India through historical, socio-legal, feminist and human rights perspectives. The provision on adultery was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of India in 2018. The article analyses the legal developments culminating in the landmark judgment, as well as its aftermath.
It addresses, as a central question, the construction of intimate relationships in criminal law, law’s emphasis on and interest in enforcing a monogamous marriage and consequently the non-recognition of sexual autonomy of women within the same.
Through an examination of the judicial reasoning, international jurisprudence, established human rights standards and feminist scholarship, the article argues that adultery has no place in criminal law.
Further, it argues that family laws must broaden and take into account newer forms of marriage and relationships that defy traditional, hetero-monogamous notions, based on egalitarian and inclusive principles.
Published in: Women & Criminal Justice
To read the full article, please click here .
Last updated : September 16th, 2021 10:03 am
Adultery as defined under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery.”
Personal laws all over the world censure the act of adultery, and it is contemplated as a ground for divorce or separation. Moreover, the Hindu law that has no concept of separating or divorcing once married also condemns the act of adultery unambiguously. In the current scenario, adultery is a ground for divorce or separation.
Adultery is a crucial matter, and it has always been a matter of disparity in the related judgments of the courts. The primary reason is to decide which circumstantial evidence can be considered as proof of adultery. For example, Odisha High Court in the case of Banchanidde vs Kamladas said that only irresistible conclusion could be adultery, as circumstances should be so compelling.
However, in the case of Subbarma vs Saraswathi, Madras High Court said that if an unrelated person is found with the wife after midnight, it may be considered as an adulterous act.
In another case Maclenna vs Maclenna, Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland, the court faces a dilemma when the question raised that whether a wife using Artificial Insemination Donor (AID) without her husband’s consent can be considered as adultery or not. However, the court stated that AID could not be considered as adultery and rule in favour of the wife. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the burden of proof that whether the act of adultery took place or not lies on the petitioner only.
Adultery is defined under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is a ground for divorce in India. According to it, adultery is an act of voluntarily indulging into sexual intercourse out of marriage, i.e. any person who is not the spouse of the respondent. Thus, it becomes necessary for the petitioner to prove that he/she is married to the respondent, and the respondent made voluntary sexual intercourse with another person.
Any of the spouse filing a divorce petition have to prove the statement with pieces of evidence. With time and significant cases, Indian courts have emphasized that the act of adultery have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. However, over the years Honourable Supreme Court’s in such cases seems to differ, stating that proving beyond reasonable doubts is a compulsion for criminal cases, not civil cases.
In a similar case Dastane vs Dastane, the Supreme Court stated that the presence of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is not a necessity, when such crucial personal relationships are involved, like a husband and his wife.
Kerala High Court in the case of Ammini E.J. vs Union of India stated that between the spouses, the husband is in an advantageous condition when it comes to adultery being a ground for divorce because along with the wife proving adultery, will face uncomfortable situations. Therefore, it will be discriminatory towards the wife. In the case, the court also ruled that the wife can also file a divorce petition against her husband on the grounds of only adultery, without any other offence such as desertion or cruelty.
The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 passed and made the ground for divorce and judicial separation common. Under the amendment, any aggrieved party can file a petition for divorce or judicial separation by choice.
Prior to this, enactment was considered as the conduct of immorality. Though adultery was a matter of grave shame, still it was not a ground for divorce. This amendment made the grounds for divorce and judicial separation same, and it was marked as a significant development in the category of Hindu Personal law.
Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, says adultery is defined as a ground for judicial separation. The section states that the parties can file a decree for judicial separation or divorce because they are mentioned under Section 13(1) of the act. However, it is irrespective of the fact that before or after the commencement of adultery marriage being solemnized.
In the case of Sulekha Bairagi vs Prof. Kamala Kanta Bairagi, Calcutta High Court, the matter was that according to the husband, his wife used to visit the co-respondent and was caught in a compromising position. The wife was also accused of neglecting her marital duties. The court took the decision in favour of the petitioner, i.e. the husband on the merit of the provided evidence and thus granted the judicial separation.
The above cases prove the fact that decisions of such cases are bases on the facts and nature. There need not be similarity, as the decision is on a merit basis.
According to Quran, the act of adultery is a severely punishable offence, and it is to be punished by stoning to death. However, due to humane treatment to the citizens under a democratic constitution, it is not possible. Under Muslim law, a husband has a right to divorce his wife if he has enough evidence to prove the wife’s adulterous relationship. However, only in the circumstances of false evidence, a wife can ask to withdraw the accusations or can divorce him.
But, in case the husband withdraws the claims and apologizes in the particular manner prescribed by the law, the claim of the wife gets subsists. Allahabad High Court sated in the case of Tufail Ahmad vs Jamila Khatun that this may be used as a ground for divorce to such wives who are not guilty of the act of adultery.
Section 2(viii)(b)of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act,1939, states that if a man leads an ill-famed life or associates himself with any woman of evil repute, his wife can sue the man on charges of cruelty. This concept of Muslim law is close to the concept of adultery.
In the Zaffar Hussain v. Ummat-ur-Rahma, 1919at Allahabad High Court, the wife accused her husband of stating before people that she had illicit intercourse with her brother. In its judgment, the court ruled that if a woman is falsely accused of adultery, she can claim divorce for the same. On the other hand, the wife is not liable to claim a divorce if the accusations of adultery are true.
The Indian Divorce and Act, 1869 and Indian Christian Marriages Act, 1872 deals with the divorce and judicial separation laws for Christians in India. The Indian Divorce Act, 1869, Section 22, bars divorce with mensa et toro (legal separation). But, it has made a provision for judicial separation on the grounds of adultery.
There are dual procedures when it comes to granting a divorce in India under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872.
Under the first one, the Christian couple has to obtain an annulment from the concerned Church where the marriage was performed, and then they may apply the courts for a divorce. It is noteworthy that under the act, the wife had to prove a few other grounds as well, along with adultery, such as cruelty, insanity, change in religion, etc. Whereas in the case of the husband, proving just the act of adultery of his wife is enough ground for divorce. However, Section 11 of the Christian Marriage Act, 1872 states that the adultery has to be pleaded and be present as a co-respondent.
Under the second way, a Christian woman is allowed to file a petition for judicial separation on the grounds of adultery. Section 22 of the act, is not applicable for the decree of divorce buy allows both the husband and the wife, a judicial separation on the grounds of adultery.
The act of adultery is recognized by the Special Marriage Act, 1954 as it is a valid ground for divorce if the respondent had have voluntary sexual intercourse with a person who is not his/her spouse, after solemnization of the marriage. Under the act adultery is a separate offence, and it does not need to be presented with any other offence in order to file a petition for divorce or judicial separation.
Calcutta High Court in the case of Sari v. Kalyan, 198, mentioned that though adultery does not have the burden of preponderance, it is a serious matter, and it needs to be proved beyond any kind of reasonable doubt. This is because when it comes to adultery, there may not exist prima facia evidence, but the circumstantial evidence needs to be sufficed.
Adultery has always been demoralized in our country. In fact, in India, the discouragement has been grown with time. In our country, till the year 1976 adultery was a ground for divorce only if the spouse was living in adultery, but now, a petition of divorce or judicial separation can be filed even if there is one single instance of voluntary sexual intercourse with a person other than the spouse.
In India, the judiciary has taken a serious view on the concept of adultery. It has taken the various social conditions, circumstances of the party applied for divorce and the presence of children in consideration. The cases when filing the petition has been delayed when there are children are taken lightly. However, there is no compulsion to use this rule in all adultery related cases. It is the complete discretion of the concerned court to decide each case in its own merits and demerits. The merits and demerits can be the economic status, children (if any), family condition and society.
One Person Company | Nidhi Company | Company Registration | Tax Notice | Indian Subsidiary | HSN Code | Section 8 Company | Trademark Search | USA Company Registration | FSSAI Registration | Import Export Code | ESI Registration | Proprietorship | GST Return Filing | Patta Chitta | PF Registration | Payroll | Business Tax Return Filing | PF Return Filing | Eway Bill | GST Registration | TDS Filing | Udyam Registration | Trademark Registration | Startup India Registration | Professional Tax | Personal Tax Filing | Check Company or LLP name Availability
Partnership | Limited Liability Partnership | Digital Signature | Copyright Registration | Unified Portal | PAN Card Download | Nadakacheri | Flipkart Seller | Caste Certificate | IAY | EPFO Passbook | Domicile Certificate | Udyog Aadhaar | PF Withdrawal | Karnataka One | Encumbrance Certificate | Bonafide Certificate | Instant PAN Card | E PAN Card | Income Certificate | Marriage Certificate | Passport Renewal | Nivesh Mitra | MSME Registration | Experience Certificate | Trademark Status | Trade License | Domicile | eMitra | UAN | PICME | Resignation Letter Format | Ration Card | TNREGINET | RAJSSP | LLP Compliance | Form 16 | Police Clearance Certificate | OBC Certificate | Jamabandi | Mee Bhoomi | SC Certificate | UAN Login | eAadhaar Download | Linking Aadhaar To Bank Accounts | mAadhaar | Aadhaar Enrollment Centre | UAN Passbook | Amazon How to Sell | PAN Card Apply | EPFO Unified Portal
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
ABSTRACT : Adultery is an offence in India, culpable with up to five years detainment under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. When one sees the reality, the first response is like a shock at the State's obvious interruption into the apparently private sexual domains of life. The paper starts considering standards managing criminalization of direct, to decide if some principled ...
Adulterers have always suffered from society's disapproving attitude towards them. In India, adultery is criminalized under Section 497 IPC. As per criminal law in India, offence of adultery is ...
Abstract. Legal analysis of regulation of adulterous behavior of married persons under different legal systems demonstrate that the provision of adultery is greatly influenced by the social values of, "sexual morality," which existed at the moment of formulating the legal provision. In India, S. 497 of IPC had been drafted before a 150-year ...
The philosophy, object and justification of legal regulation of adulterous behavior of a person in society has been examined on time scale so as to make appraisal whether its retention ...
Abstract- This paper tries to find the impact that the Adultery Judgement pronounced by the Honourable Supreme Court of India has been able to impact the people on the bond of marriage. For this, the judgement was analysed after which a questionnaire was made to a distinct set of age groups. Then the answers of the questionnaire were analysed ...
This article examines the birth, life and death of the criminal law provision on adultery in India through historical, socio-legal, feminist and human rights perspectives. The provision on adultery...
The idea of adultery is emphasized throughout the study of India. At the beginning of the paper, there is a summary of the idea that is presented. In the second part of the article, an in-depth investigation of the Indian Penal Code's Article 497, which is devoted to the transgression of adultery, is presented.
Shodhganga : a reservoir of Indian theses @ INFLIBNET The Shodhganga@INFLIBNET Centre provides a platform for research students to deposit their Ph.D. theses and make it available to the entire scholarly community in open access.
The Shodhganga@INFLIBNET Centre provides a platform for research students to deposit their Ph.D. theses and make it available to the entire scholarly community in open access.
Adultery and the Indian law. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine, 10 (2), 26-29. abstract = "Adultery shows a conflict between social pressure and individual struggle for happiness. Adulterers have always suffered from society's disapproving attitude towards them. In India, adultery is criminalized under Section 497 IPC.
The decision to decriminalize Adultery in India does not seem to be based on established principles of criminal jurisprudence because it has led to chaos and confusion in the minds of common people and has also disturbed the social order as public opinion and the Indian culture has not taken into consideration.
Adultery, sometimes found in the form of incest, is a consensual sexual act between two persons who are not in a conjugal relationship with each other. Adultery is considered sinful and wrong in Hindu traditions, so much so that it is also unlawful and criminal under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code. The Hindu Dharmaśāstras forbid any ...
(DOI: 10.48175/ijarsct-9267) In a country like India marriage and family are regarded as a basis of society. Adultery has been a part of human society for as long as there has been existence of marriage. Marriage is more precisely a personal factor as it includes a relationship between two human beings who wilfully decide to cohabit with each other for their remaining lives.
Punishment for the offence of adultery. The punishment given under Section 497 is imprisonment for a term extending to five years, a fine, or both. However, as mentioned above, this Section was struck down by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) and is therefore not applicable today.
The idea of adultery is emphasized throughout the study of India. At the beginning of the paper, there is a summary of the idea that is presented. In the second part of the article, an in-depth investigation of the Indian Penal Code's Article 497, which is devoted to the transgression of adultery, is presented.
Union of India (2018), the Court held adultery as defined under Section 497 of the IPC as being manifestly arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of the dignity of a woman and therefore, unconstitutional.
This article examines the birth, life and death of the criminal law provision on adultery in India through historical, socio-legal, feminist and human rights perspectives.
The authors would also like to acknowledge the research assistance of Devashri Mishra, Didon Misri, Gauri Pillai, Katyayani Sinha, and Tyler McKenna at various stages of this paper. Many thanks especially to Kavya Kartik for her excellent research and editorial assistance.
India's top court has ruled adultery is no longer a crime, striking down a 158-year-old colonial-era law which it said treated women as male property. Previously any man who had sex with a married ...
An effective enforcement of the socio-legal ideal of monogamy in India requires, as the first step, a proper reform of sections 494 and 495 of IPC as also of the laws of divorce applicable to various communities in India. The latter are outside the scope of the present paper and require a separate study in depth.
The act was punishable u/s 497 of the IPC. However, the section was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2018, (Joseph Shine vs. Union of India) terming it to be unconstitutional based on gender discrimination. 16 The court observed that adultery is a marital wrong, which should have only civil consequences.
Adultery is defined under Section 13 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is a ground for divorce in India. According to it, adultery is an act of voluntarily indulging into sexual intercourse out of marriage, i.e. any person who is not the spouse of the respondent. Thus, it becomes necessary for the petitioner to prove that he/she is married ...
Abstract Live-in relationship, that is, living together as couple without being married to each other in a legally accepted way, is considered a taboo in India. But recently, such relationships are being increasingly common due to a variety of reasons. In absence of any specific legislation, rules, or customs on the subject, the Supreme Court has issued certain guidelines in its judgment for ...