sports medicine research

Recent Posts

Safe return following testing positive.

by Kyle P. Harris | Dec 6, 2023

Elite-level athletes with a history of COVID-19 had cardiac measurements similar to unexposed elite athletes. Hence, return to sports participation is safe for athletes following COVID-19.

Eliminating Body Checking has Been Positive; However, Female Ice Hockey Players are Still at Risk!

by Jane McDevitt | Nov 29, 2023

Youth ice hockey policy eliminating body checking decreases the risk of concussion; however, concussion rates are still high among female ice hockey players.

The Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance: Consensus Statement for the American College of Sports Medicine

by Jeffrey B. Driban | Nov 6, 2023

Quick Links

• Leadership & Committees
• 2022-2027 Strategic Plan
• Patient Resources
• Sports Medicine Careers
• AOSSM Apparel Store
• Education & Events
• 2025 Annual Meeting
• Featured Programs & Events
• Abstract Submission
• eLearning Zone
• Claiming CME/MOC Credits
• Sports Medicine Fellowships
• Become a Member
• Member Benefits
• Early Career Engagement
• Traveling Fellowship
• Awards & Recognitions
• Sports Medicine Update
• Research Agenda
• Grant Opportunities
• Past Grant Recipients
• Member Sponsored Surveys

American Journal of Sports Medicine

• Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach
• Video Journal of Sports Medicine
• Easy Reider Podcast
• Corporate Partners
• Partnership Opportunities
• Support AOSSM
• Member Login

The American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) is the official peer-reviewed scientific journal of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM). Founded in 1972, AJSM is an essential forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. AJSM is published 14 times a year and contains original articles addressed to orthopaedic surgeons, team physicians, athletic trainers, and physical therapists focusing on the treatment and prevention of athletic injuries.

AJSM has a five-year impact factor of 5.4 and is ranked number 9 out of 136 orthopaedic publications* and number 7 out of 127 sports sciences publications*, explore how the AJSM and Bruce Reider, MD, Editor-in-Chief, can expand your knowledge and keep you up-to-date with the latest research through our online content .

View AJSM’s Editorial Board here.

View the Journal

AOSSM is a trusted source among the orthopaedic sports medicine profession for knowledge, skills, and continuing education. Login now to see a complete list of what's next in orthopaedic sports medicine education.

Additional Resources

Explore how the American Journal of Sports Medicine can expand your knowledge and keep you up to date with the latest research through our online content.

Current Concepts/Journal CME

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ’s Current Concepts CME activity tests your knowledge and application of material presented in Current Concept articles. Earn one credit per article towards your Part II MOC CME requirements after completing a short online post-test and evaluation. This activity provides you with researched-based information and application of critical topics in sports medicine with the most updated information for you to reflect, evaluate, and use in your practice.

This is an easy and convenient way to get your Orthopaedic CME credits for articles that you are already reading!

Keep current with AJSM monthly podcasts. The 5-in-5 podcast is an overview of each issue, making this a great start before you dive deep into each issue. After reading an issue, listen to our in-depth podcast to learn more about authors, research and editorial commentary.

Video Abstracts

Each issue features a video abstract that summarizes a feature article.

The AJSM Webinar Series provides an opportunity for authors to discuss their work with readers with ample time set aside for Q&A. Earn up to 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit ™ after completing a brief post-test and evaluation.

By clicking "Accept", you agree to the storing of cookies on your device and our use to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our communication efforts. Our cookie policy is available here .

Sports Medicine

Sports Medicine bridges the gap between science and practice in the promotion of exercise and health, and in the scientific assessment, study and understanding of sports performance. Regular features include: sports injury prevention and treatment; exercise for health; drugs in sport and recommendations for training and nutrition.

Designed as a superb reference source for physicians, sports medicine specialists, physiotherapists, exercise physiologists, team doctors and trainers alike, Sports Medicine focuses on definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate the current literature to provide the rationale for, and application of, research findings.

Sports Medicine also welcomes the submission of high-quality original research in the above fields.

As a hybrid journal, Sports Medicine does not charge authors to publish using the traditional subscription-based publishing route, but does offer the option to publish accepted articles open access if authors so wish or if their funders require ( more information ).

Sports Medicine offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content ( more information ).

• Steve McMillan,
• Roger Olney

Latest issue

Volume 54, Issue 7

Latest articles

Criteria and guidelines for returning to running following a tibial bone stress injury: a scoping review.

• Esther R. M. George
• Kelly R. Sheerin
• Duncan Reid

The Influence of Nutrition Intervention on the P1NP and CTX-1 Response to an Acute Exercise Bout: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

• Eimear Dolan
• Alina Dumas
• Paul A. Swinton

The Effects of a Novel Sodium Bicarbonate Ingestion System on Repeated 4 km Cycling Time Trial Performance in Well-Trained Male Cyclists

• Lewis A. Gough
• S. Andy Sparks

The Respiratory Compensation Point: Mechanisms and Relation to the Maximal Metabolic Steady State

• Daniel A. Keir
• Silvia Pogliaghi
• Danilo Iannetta

Brain Punch: K-1 Fights Affect Brain Wave Activity in Professional Kickboxers

• Łukasz Rydzik
• Marta Kopańska
• Jacek Szczygielski

Journal updates

Digital features.

Sports Medicine  is able to host a range of digital features, with a number of options available to authors.

Journal information

• CAB Abstracts
• Google Scholar
• IFIS Publishing
• Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
• Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals and Series
• OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service
• Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
• Semantic Scholar
• TD Net Discovery Service
• UGC-CARE List (India)

Rights and permissions

Editorial policies

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Access Member Benefits

ACSM Membership

Whether you’re a student, academic, physician or exercise professional, you can jumpstart, revitalize and accelerate your career by becoming an ACSM member.

ACSM Certification

Join a community of industry-leading certified professionals who are dedicated to enriching lives through the power of movement.

• Exercise is Medicine

Make physical activity assessment and promotion a standard in clinical care, connecting all people to evidence-based physical activity resources.

New at ACSM

Feature post, anti-doping efforts in paris 2024.

Olympic athletes are subject to drug tests both in and out of active competition. Get an inside look at the process.

Recent Blog Posts

• 2024 Election Results
• News Archive
• Certification Task Force
• Advertise with ACSM
• Current Partners
• Rankings Archive
• Blogs and Resources
• National Youth Sports Health & Safety Institute
• Annual Report 2022
• Annual Report 2023
• Annual Report 2024
• Honor & Citation Awards
• Strategic Plan
• Student Membership
• Alliance Membership
• Professional-in-Training Membership
• Professional Membership
• Renew Membership
• Regional Chapters
• Member Code of Ethics
• ACSM Member Spotlight
• Group Exercise Instructor
• ACSM Personal Trainer Prep
• ACSM Exercise Physiologist Prep
• ACSM Clinical Exercise Physiologist Prep
• Beijing Institute of Sports Medicine
• Wellness Academy
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Recertification FAQs
• Find an ACSM Certified Professional
• Certified Professional of the Year
• Wellcoaches
• Certified Professional Discounts
• Hire ACSM Certified Professionals
• Specialty Certificate Programs
• ceOnline FAQs
• Approved Providers
• Current Sports Medicine Reports
• Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
• Exercise, Sport, and Movement
• Health & Fitness Journal
• Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
• Translational Journal
• Paper of the Year Awards
• ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription
• ACSM's Resources for the Personal Trainer
• ACSM's Resources for the Exercise Physiologist
• ACSM's Clinical Exercise Physiology
• ACSM's Resources for the Group Exercise Instructor
• ACSM's Certification Review
• ACSM's Foundations of Strength Training and Conditioning
• ACSM's Nutrition Exercise Science
• ACSM's Essentials of Youth Fitness
• ACSM's Introduction to Exercise Science
• ACSM's Health/Fitness Facility Standards and Guidelines
• ACSM’s Body Composition Assessment
• ACSM's Complete Guide to Fitness and Health
• Preparticipation Physical Evaluation (PPE) Monograph, 5th Edition
• ACSM's Fitness Assessment Manual
• ACSMs Exercise Testing and Prescription
• Textbook Adoption
• Translated Position Stands
• ACSM Official Statements
• Team Physician Consensus Statements
• Resource Library
• ACSM Fitness Trends
• Autism and Exercise
• Sudden Cardiac Arrest
• Mental Health
• Physical Activity Guidelines
• Reducing Sedentary Behavior
• Sex Differences and Transgender Athlete Care
• Faculty Resources
• EIM Clinical Resources
• Black History Month
• ACSM's Brown Bag Series (archived)
• Emerging Physician Leaders Pilot Program
• Annual Meeting
• IDEA & ACSM Health & Fitness Summit
• Advanced Team Physician Course
• Sports Medicine Essentials
• Integrative Physiology of Exercise Conference
• International Team Physician Course
• Regional Chapter Meetings
• Meeting Exhibits and Sponsors
• Research & Program Grants
• Howard G. "Skip" Knuttgen Scholar Award
• Travel and Research Awards
• ACSM Research Grant Recipients
• ACSM Travel Award Recipients
• Dedicated Endowments & Funds
• Planned Giving / Discovery Society

British Journal of Sports Medicine

(BJSM) is the leading, peer-reviewed journal in sports medicine, with additional multimedia resources.

Impact Factor: 11.6 Citescore: 27.1 All metrics >>

British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a  Plan S compliant Transformative Journal .

British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a multimedia portal for authoritative original research, systematic reviews, consensus statements and debate in sport and exercise medicine (SEM). We define sport and exercise medicine broadly. BJSM’s web, print, video and audio material serves the international sport and exercise medicine community which includes 25 clinical societies who have over 13,000 members. You can access BJSM on Facebook , Twitter , Instagram and Youtube as well as via our podcasts , Stitcher and blog.

BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine  is a companion journal to theBritish Journal of Sports Medicine

BJSM Global Research Grant 2024, please see here for more information >>

Meet the new Editors! For more information, please visit the landing page>>

BMJ and BJSM are fully committed to ensure best practice in publication ethics. Please see our joint statement for further information >>

Topical Issues

A collection of key resources, providing an overview of the current medical issues and research landscape in #GolfMedicine

a focus on the latest multidisciplinary research in hip and groin pathology

A global SEM team tackles some of sport’s toughest topics: Abuse, Racism, Ableism, Sexism, and Transphobia

“Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus” – answering the call for an increased focus on female-specific SEM research

Latest Articles

Original research :

15 August 2024

9 August 2024

Infographic :

Consensus statement :

Featured Video

Motor retraining by real-time sonic feedback: understanding strategies of low impact running (phd academy award).

To cite: Van den Berghe P. Motor retraining by real-time sonic feedback: understanding strategies of low impact running (PhD Academy Award). British Journal of Sports Medicine 2022;56:1196-1197. Read the full article here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105750 Video abstract complementing the PhD Academy Award article “Motor retraining by real-time sonic feedback: understanding strategies of low impact running”. The aims of this PhD thesis were to (1) develop, (2) to validate a wearable system for impact reduction through the use of real-time, music-based biofeedback, (3) to evaluate its effectiveness in a gait retraining context, and to gain insight into possible strategies for low impact running.

BJSM accepts submissions of a wide range of article types, including original research, education articles and systematic reviews.

The Author Information section provides specific article requirements to help you turn your research into an article suitable for BJSM.

Information is also provided on editorial policies and open access

Most Read Articles

Systematic review :

29 September 2023

18 October 2023

6 October 2023

8 March 2024

Current Issue

31 July 2024

Editorial :

Sports Medicine - Open

• Most accessed

Stressing the Relevance of Differentiating between Systematic and Random Measurement Errors in Ultrasound Muscle Thickness Diagnostics

Authors: Lars Hubertus Lohmann, Martin Hillebrecht, Stephan Schiemann and Konstantin Warneke

Patient’s Perception of the Role of Gym Activity in Abdominal Wall Herniation in Adults: A Prospective Study

Authors: Prabir Boruah, Rabbani Mahmoud ElSayed Hassan Daoud, Dylan Viani Walsh, Natallia Kharytaniuk, Salim Fredericks, James Ryan, Asila Abdelatif, Nuha Birido and Thomas Noel Walsh

Why should the Next Generation of Youth Guidelines Prioritize Vigorous Physical Activity?

Authors: Helmi Chaabene, Adrian Markov and Lutz Schega

Associations of Sex and Sport Contact-Level with Recovery Timelines Among Collegiate Athletes with Sport-Related Concussion

Authors: Bernadette A. D’Alonzo, Andrea L. C. Schneider, Ian J. Barnett, Christina L. Master, Abigail C. Bretzin and Douglas J. Wiebe

Response to “Comment on: Machine Learning for Understanding and Predicting Injuries in Football”

Authors: Aritra Majumdar, Rashid Bakirov and Tim Rees

The original article was published in Sports Medicine - Open 2024 10 :84

The Leading Article to this article has been published in Sports Medicine - Open 2022 8 :73

Most recent articles RSS

View all articles

The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature

Authors: Thomas Haugen, Stephen Seiler, Øyvind Sandbakk and Espen Tønnessen

Mental Health In Elite Athletes: Increased Awareness Requires An Early Intervention Framework to Respond to Athlete Needs

Authors: Rosemary Purcell, Kate Gwyther and Simon M. Rice

The Training Characteristics of World-Class Distance Runners: An Integration of Scientific Literature and Results-Proven Practice

Authors: Thomas Haugen, Øyvind Sandbakk, Stephen Seiler and Espen Tønnessen

Running economy: measurement, norms, and determining factors

Authors: Kyle R Barnes and Andrew E Kilding

Falls and injuries to Polo players: risk perception, mitigation and risk factors

Authors: C M Inness and K L Morgan

Most accessed articles RSS

Aims and scope

Sports Medicine - Open focuses on original research and definitive reviews in the field of sport and exercise medicine. The Journal includes medical and scientific research relating to:

• Sporting performance enhancement including nutrition, equipment and training
• Medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise
• Injury prevention and treatment
• Exercise for rehabilitation and health
• The application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sporting codes

Key Points Articles published in Sports Medicine - Open will include a Key Points table. Please provide approximately three short, stand-alone lines/statements summarizing the key findings/implications of the paper. These should be provided after the Abstract under the heading 'Key Points’.

Latest blog

A better approach to talent identification?

30 November 2017

• Editorial Board
• Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal

Annual Journal Metrics

Citation Impact 2023 Journal Impact Factor: 4.1 5-year Journal Impact Factor: 5.5 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.740 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.446

Speed 2023 Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 16 Submission to acceptance (median days): 216

Usage 2023 Downloads: 1,609,820 Altmetric mentions: 4,288

• More about our metrics
• ISSN: 2198-9761 (electronic)

The American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) is a national and international leader in sports medicine research related to clinical and surgical outcomes, biomechanics, and rehabilitation. The foci of ongoing studies at ASMI includes both clinical and biomechanical research, and our team includes researchers with expertise in motion capture biomechanics, cadaver joint biomechanics, outcomes research, clinical trials, biostatistics, and human anatomy.

ASMI’s mission is to improve the understanding, prevention, and treatment of sports-related injuries through research and education. In our strive for this mission, ASMI studies are regularly published in high-impact sports medicine journals, presented at scientific meetings, publicized in the media, and utilized in bodies creating sports safety policies. 

Frequently Asked Questions

• What is sports medicine? Sports medicine is a field of medicine concerned with the prevention and treatment of injuries and disorders that are related to participation in sports.
• Does your research only include athletes? The mission of ASMI is to improve the understanding, prevention, and treatment of sports-related injuries through research and education. This includes everyone from youth to professional athletes, as well as recreational adult athletes and people working to be healthy and fit. Our research team also explores treatment outcomes of non-athletes, particularly those with orthopaedic injuries or surgeries.
• What is the difference between biomechanical research and clinical research? ASMI’s biomechanics studies the motions and forces to minimize injury risk and maximize performance in sports. Other biomechanical studies at ASMI investigate the strength of human joints after surgery compared to their natural, undamaged state. Clinical research at ASMI involves both observational studies and clinical trials. Observational studies generally include examination of what is already occurring (no intervention), whereas clinical trials are carefully designed experiments that involve a specific treatment or intervention. Specifically, our clinical team works to evaluate surgical outcomes, rehabilitation efficacy, as well as injury mechanisms and prevention to improve treatment of sports-related and orthopaedic injuries. Importantly, our biomechanical and clinical research teams work closely together to fulfill the mission of ASMI.
• How can I get involved in research at ASMI? Being involved in ASMI research means contributing to knowledge that directly improves the prevention and treatment of sports-related injuries. We work closely with our local physician and surgeon partners and other collaborators around the country and world to achieve these impactful research goals. Opportunities to participate in research at ASMI’s center in Birmingham are available for students and scholars of all levels. Learn more about how to get involved here .

Biomechanical Research

Our Biomechanical Research department works extensively to further our goal of preventing injury in sports.

Clinical Research

Our Clinical Research department is instrumental in improving treatment for sports related injuries.

Student Researcher Program

The Student Researcher Program is an opportunity for college undergraduate students, graduate students, and others to participate in research at ASMI for thesis or school credit.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Athl Train
• v.55(3); 2020 Mar

Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Comparative Effectiveness Research

Kenneth c. lam.

* Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa

Cailee E. Welch Bacon

† School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa

Eric L. Sauers

R. curtis bay.

Recently, calls to conduct comparative effectiveness research (CER) in athletic training to better support patient care decisions have been circulated. Traditional research methods (eg, randomized controlled trials [RCTs], observational studies) may be ill suited for CER. Thus, innovative research methods are needed to support CER efforts.

To discuss the limitations of traditional research designs in CER studies, describe a novel methodologic approach called the point-of-care clinical trial (POC-CT), and highlight components of the POC-CT (eg, incorporation of an electronic medical record [EMR], Bayesian adaptive feature) that allow investigators to conduct scientifically rigorous studies at the point of care.

Description

Practical concerns (eg, high costs and limited generalizability of RCTs, the inability to control for bias in observational studies) may stall CER efforts in athletic training. In short, the aim of the POC-CT is to embed a randomized pragmatic trial into routine care; thus, patients are randomized to minimize potential bias, but the study is conducted at the point of care to limit cost and improve the generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, the POC-CT uses an EMR to replace much of the infrastructure associated with a traditional RCT (eg, research team, patient and clinician reminders) and a Bayesian adaptive feature to help limit the number of patients needed for the study. Together, the EMR and Bayesian adaptive feature can improve the overall feasibility of the study and preserve the typical clinical experiences of the patient and clinician.

Clinical Advantages

The POC-CT includes the basic tenets of practice-based research because studies are conducted at the point of care, in real-life settings, and during routine clinical practice. If implemented effectively, the POC-CT can be seamlessly integrated into daily clinical practice, allowing investigators to establish patient-reported evidence that may be quickly applied to patient care decisions. This design appears to be a promising approach for CER investigations and may help establish a “learning health care system” in the sports medicine community.

• Compared with traditional research methods such as the randomized controlled trial and observational studies, the point-of-care clinical trial (POC-CT) may better facilitate and support comparative effectiveness research.
• By incorporating an electronic medical record, the researchers in a POC-CT seek to embed many research-related processes without disrupting the patient care experience as well as reduce patient and clinician burden during the clinical trial.
• The use of a Bayesian adaptive design during a POC-CT can result in clinical trials that are more efficient and ethical.

As the sports medicine community continues its push toward an evidence-based practice (EBP) culture, it is apparent that a gap persists between the evidence generated by researchers and the evidence patients and clinicians need to inform patient care decisions. 1 This gap is marked by the historically limited and slow process of translating research findings from the laboratory environment to the patient care setting. 1 This incorporation of evidence into routine patient care, particularly intervention-related evidence, is often hindered by traditional approaches to athletic training research. Specifically, intervention studies are typically conducted in a well-controlled laboratory setting with a relatively small and homogeneous sample (fewer than 30 healthy college-aged participants). 2 Thus, these investigators generally address the efficacy (does the intervention work under well-controlled and optimal treatment conditions?) and not the effectiveness (does the intervention work under routine and variable treatment conditions?) of interventions. 3 – 6 In addition, athletic training researchers have generally emphasized disease-oriented outcomes as opposed to patient-oriented outcomes. 2 Taken together, these traditional research approaches tended to produce lower-quality studies and generate evidence with less strength of recommendation, as classified by the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy. 7

Because clinicians do not work in well-controlled environments and the measurements obtained typically do not provide patients with meaningful information (eg, patient-reported outcomes) to inform their care decisions, the findings from intervention studies can be difficult to apply to patient care decisions. As an example, consider the treatment of chronic ankle instability (CAI), which is a well-researched condition in sports medicine. 8 Recent authors 8 have used patient-reported outcome measures to identify the benefits of different treatment approaches for this condition, including various manual therapy methods. However, most of the best available evidence relied on relatively small study samples of individuals from a general university student population. 8 Further, the treatments assessed in most of these studies were provided in research laboratory settings. 8 Because these participant and treatment settings do not reflect usual care, incorporating research-based evidence into the routine care of patients with CAI can be challenging. Ideally, and as highlighted by the translational research model, promising laboratory-based, efficacy findings should be translated and tested in more usual patient care environments and in real patients to better estimate the overall effectiveness of a treatment. 5

To encourage more effectiveness studies, government health care agencies 9 – 11 and the sports medicine community 12 – 14 have advocated for comparative effectiveness research (CER). Deeply rooted in practice-based research 13 , 15 and clinical outcomes assessment, 16 , 17 CER involves direct comparison of existing treatments to determine what works best. Pragmatic CER studies are conducted at the point of care in real-life environments and emphasize the importance of evaluating patient-reported outcomes when determining the effectiveness of an intervention. 18 More specifically, CER compares the effectiveness of 1 intervention with another intervention for treatment of the same condition or illness. 19 When studies are conducted properly, CER findings allow patients, clinicians, and policymakers to identify the most effective intervention for a specified condition while considering factors such as cost efficiency and the overall burden of the intervention (eg, duration and amount of treatment) when making patient care decisions. 19 Consider again our CAI example. In a CER study, treatment of patients with this condition would compare the effectiveness of 1 common intervention with another common intervention that may be less time consuming or less costly (or both) for the clinician. To estimate the effectiveness of the intervention, the study would focus on patient-reported outcomes relating to functional capabilities and health-related quality of life. By comparing 2 common treatment approaches supported by the current best evidence and determining effectiveness based on patient-reported outcomes, findings from CER studies may provide better information for clinicians and patients and guide patient care decisions. 18

Although the need for and benefits of CER in athletic training are clear, 13 conducting such studies can be challenging. Traditional research methods, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, are ill suited for CER, so new, innovative research methods are needed to meet the objectives of CER. 19 – 27 One such design, the point-of-care clinical trial (POC-CT) , addresses the limitations of RCT (eg, high costs, viability in a real-life setting, lack of generalizability of the findings) and observational (eg, bias, potential confounders) designs so that rigorous clinical research can be feasibly conducted during routine patient care. 22 , 25 Although the POC-CT design has been successfully used in medical practices and hospital-based research networks, 20 , 24 it has yet to be applied in athletic training research. Thus, more CER studies in athletic training are necessary to support EBP and improve patient care. The objectives of this article are to discuss the limitations of traditional research designs (RCTs, observational studies) as they relate to CER, describe the POC-CT as an alternative to traditional research designs for CER studies, and highlight major features of the POC-CT in the context of CER and EBP. To illustrate how the POC-CT can be implemented in athletic training research, we will continue to use the example of treating patients with CAI.

LIMITATIONS OF TRADITIONAL RESEARCH DESIGNS

To understand the inherent limitations of applying traditional research designs to CER studies, the inverse relationship between the internal and external validity of experimental designs and how this relationship affects the goals of CER and EBP efforts must first be examined. Internal validity determines the scientific rigor of a study. In short, investigators seek to identify known or expected sources of variability to reduce their influence and isolate the true effect of the intervention being investigated. 28 , 29 Threats to internal validity are many, 30 but all introduce systematic error that can bias the results of a study. One common threat is the introduction of a confounding (extraneous) factor that occurs outside of the study protocol: for example, a participant assigned to the no-treatment group who receives treatment from a clinician not associated with the ongoing study. Another example is the researcher's conscious or unintentional assignment of patients with more severe injuries to the treatment group, which would be a form of experimenter bias. When designing a study, investigators use multiple strategies, such as random assignment of participants into groups and control or comparison groups that do not receive the intervention of interest, to protect against threats to internal validity and to isolate any cause-and-effect relationship between the independent (treatment) and dependent (outcome of the study) variables. 28 , 29

External validity is concerned with the degree to which the results may be generalized beyond the context of the study: that is, the ability to apply the study findings to other patients and environments. 28 , 29 To enhance generalizability, investigators seek to include a sample of participants that represents the larger patient population of interest. This is typically accomplished by creating inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study that reflect the target patient population and conducting the study in an environment similar to that in which the treatment is typically provided. 28 , 29 Both internal and external validity are important research design considerations, but a high degree of internal validity generally limits external validity and vice versa. When designing and conducting clinical research, investigators must balance internal and external validity to maximize both scientific rigor and generalizability. To date, researchers have relied primarily on 2 methods for conducting health care research: RCT and observational designs.

The Randomized Controlled Trial

The RCT is considered the criterion standard of experimental designs because of its ability to protect against threats to internal validity. 31 , 32 Features of the RCT, such as strict selection criteria for participants, inclusion of a control or comparison group, random assignment of participants into treatment and comparison groups, and rigid intervention and measurement protocols, can help control for bias from potentially confounding factors, allowing for a better estimate of the effect of the intervention on the study outcome. Because of its ability to limit participant heterogeneity, optimize internal validity, and establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the intervention and the outcome, a well-designed RCT can generate the highest levels of evidence. 7 However, this approach also has several well-known limitations, particularly when considered in the context of CER. 33

Although constraints implemented in an RCT may protect against threats to internal validity, these same constraints may limit the external validity of study findings. For example, in athletic training research, it is common for the intervention to be provided in a research laboratory by a research team member instead of in a clinic by the patient's health care provider. Scientifically, this approach is preferable because it limits variability in treatment delivery by the practitioner (usually provided by an investigator on the research team), treatment parameters (eg, frequency, duration), and protocols (eg, duration between treatments). Yet study findings may be difficult to generalize to routine patient care because the treatment environment does not reflect real-life patient care environments. 5 , 19 , 32 This is a major limitation for CER efforts because studies with low external validity do not translate into clinically meaningful interpretations of treatment effectiveness that can influence patient care decisions. This is also problematic because the goal of CER is to allow clinicians and patients to use findings to support patient care decisions. 19 , 32

In addition to external validity limitations, the RCT has practical limitations, particularly for athletic training. One major limitation is the substantial infrastructure required to successfully conduct the study. 34 This infrastructure is often cost prohibitive because it typically requires a large research team and extensive time to ensure that research processes (eg, participant recruitment, enrollment, and randomization) are completed during the study in a timely manner ( Table 1 ). 19 , 20 , 34 Furthermore, the RCT design often requires researchers or clinicians to include appointments, clinical tests, paperwork, and questionnaires beyond the standard of care, which can be time consuming and cumbersome for the patient, clinician, and research team. 31 , 34 This departure from the standard of care can also add to limitations surrounding the generalizability of the study results and negatively affect recruitment efforts and patient compliance, especially if patients perceive their participation in the study as a burden with little or no financial compensation or benefits. 25 , 34 These practical limitations are compounded in athletic training research because few clinics have the time, money, or infrastructure of the settings (academic hospitals) where RCTs are routinely conducted. 5 Given the substantial infrastructure required, high patient and clinician burden, and low external validity, the RCT may not be the optimal approach for CER investigations in athletic training. 27

Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials, Observational Designs, and Point-of-Care Clinical Trials

The Observational Study Design

Researchers have also used the observational study design to conduct CER. 26 Unlike the RCT, the observational design does not directly control research-specific variables and is typically descriptive and exploratory in nature. 20 , 26 For example, investigators may observe a patient population prospectively (follow patients and collect data over time) or retrospectively (analyze data that were previously collected) to determine if a treatment is effective. In short, data from an observational design are collected as the patient encounters occur in the real-world clinical setting, and variables are not manipulated by the investigator. 26 In addition, inclusion criteria for participant selection in an observational design may be less stringent than for an RCT. 26 , 35 In combination, these characteristics offer greater external validity than RCTs, and observational findings are considered more “representative” and, thus, more generalizable to a typical patient population. 26 , 35 Data from observational studies form the foundation of practice-based research, and the generalizability of findings to the general population is unrivaled because of large, representative samples. 26 , 35 For example, the findings from the landmark Framingham Heart study, which led to the identification of major cardiovascular risk factors, such as obesity 36 and hypertension, 37 highlighted the potential effects and importance of large observational datasets for improving patient care.

Although observational research may be a more straightforward option for CER, limitations of this study design have also been identified. If the study is not conducted prospectively, missing data are often a problem, and patients are routinely lost to follow-up if they are not enrolled in a study. Furthermore, without randomization or strict selection criteria for participants, observational designs are vulnerable to confounding variables that may lead to bias and mask the true effects of the intervention on the study outcome. 20 , 26 For instance, a researcher cannot randomize participants into groups using an observational design because the groups are often based on a condition of interest (eg, CAI, concussion, posterior shoulder tightness). To address this concern, researchers typically stratify or match participants on known confounding factors (eg, age, sex, height, weight, sport) or attempt to address group imbalances using statistical techniques, such as analysis of covariance or propensity analysis. 27 However, such techniques do not address unknown confounders or those for which data are not available. This is an inherent limitation of observational studies and can create (or fail to eliminate) systematic error in the results. 26 , 32 , 34

Although RCT and observational designs include elements conducive to CER studies, neither method is fully suited to accomplish the primary aims of a CER study. In general, the RCT suffers from a lack of external validity, whereas the observational study suffers from a lack of internal validity. As a result, researchers have been encouraged to adopt new research approaches to address the limitations of traditional RCT and observational designs to better facilitate CER efforts. 19 – 27 For example, with increased attention on CER efforts, the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator (PRECIS) tool 38 , 39 was developed to better estimate the degree to which a study addresses efficacy or effectiveness. In brief, the PRECIS tool considers 10 components of a study design, such as flexibility of the intervention application, expertise of the practitioner applying the intervention, and nature of the primary study outcome, to determine where the study falls on the explanatory (efficacy) to pragmatic (effectiveness) continuum. 38 , 39 Thus, in conjunction with CER initiatives, calls have been made for more pragmatic studies that are designed to measure the effects of interventions under routine treatment conditions. 40 , 41 With the call for more pragmatic studies to support the objective of CER efforts, researchers have developed a new and innovative study design called the POC-CT.

A NOVEL APPROACH: THE POC-CT

The POC-CT was pioneered by researchers from the Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center as a project of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), 20 – 22 the Center for Innovative Study Design at Stanford University, 21 , 22 and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. 24 , 25 The POC-CT was designed to allow researchers to address the limitations of the RCT and minimize the effects of potential sources of bias in observational designs so that rigorous clinical research could be feasibly conducted during routine patient care ( Table 2 ). 22 , 25 To accomplish this, the POC-CT features 2 innovative components rarely applied in athletic training research: (1) a fully integrated, customized electronic medical record (EMR) that can be used during routine care by both the patient and clinician and (2) a Bayesian adaptive feature that can help limit the number of patients needed for the study, restricting costs and improving the feasibility of the study.

Study Processes in Traditional Randomized Controlled Trial and Point-of-Care Clinical Trial

Abbreviation: EMR, electronic medical record.

The Role of an EMR

The hallmark of the POC-CT is that study components of the RCT are embedded into routine patient care. 22 When successfully implemented, the POC-CT, or clinically integrated randomized trial , integrates seamlessly into patient care, and the typical clinical experiences of the patient and the clinician are minimally affected by the ongoing study. 25 The use of a fully integrated EMR is a key component for preserving the typical clinical experiences of the patient and clinician during a POC-CT because both can routinely and frequently interact during patient care. 20 – 22 For example, in athletic training, a fully integrated EMR would allow the patient to routinely enter services into a daily sign-in or log-in form and complete patient-reported outcome measures and allow the clinician to comprehensively document all aspects of patient care.

With the POC-CT design, the EMR is used to facilitate research by embedding many of the study processes into the system, 20 – 22 resulting in 2 distinct benefits. First, the EMR replaces the extensive infrastructure associated with a traditional RCT, which reduces the high costs of conducting a study. 20 , 22 More specifically, the traditional RCT often requires a large research team to complete study processes, such as obtaining informed consent, randomizing participants into treatment groups, documenting patient care, and collecting clinical data in a longitudinal manner, whereas the POC-CT embeds these processes into the EMR so that minimal additional personnel are required to conduct the study ( Table 1 ). Second, using a fully integrated EMR is less intrusive on the usual clinical experiences of the patient and clinician than a traditional RCT because both individuals are accustomed to interfacing with the EMR during patient care.

To illustrate the role of the EMR, consider our CAI example as an investigation of the comparative effectiveness of 2 common manual therapy approaches 8 —Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations 42 , 43 and Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement 44 , 45 —for improving patient-reported outcomes and dorsiflexion range of motion in patients with this condition. Figure 1 provides an overview of study processes for such an investigation and highlights the role of the EMR in a POC-CT. Based on recommendations from the International Ankle Consortium, 46 patients with CAI can be identified primarily by their responses on a series of patient-reported outcome measures, including the Ankle Instability Instrument, 47 Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, 48 and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. 49 Thus, for our example, most of the screening process for potential study participants can be completed by the EMR. During a routine patient encounter (eg, preparticipation examination), patients would be asked to log into the EMR to update their demographic profiles and complete a series of patient-reported outcome measures. A screenshot of the patient view of the EMR during this screening process, beginning with the Ankle Instability Instrument, appears in Figure 2 .

Study processes and role of electronic medical record (EMR) within a point-of-care clinical trial. Abbreviations: ADL, Activities of Daily Living subscale; Sport, Sport subscale.

Screenshot of a patient's view in an electronic medical record illustrating the screening process of a point-of-care clinical trial. The Ankle Instability Instrument is pictured here and is the first patient-report measure completed by the patient.

As the patient completes each patient-reported outcome measure, an algorithm in the EMR analyzes the responses in real time to determine the patient's eligibility based on current selection criteria for patients with CAI. 46 So if the patient answers yes to question 1 and at least 4 other questions on the Ankle Instability Instrument, has a score of less than 24 points on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, and scores less than 90% on the Activities of Daily Living subscale and less than 80% on the Sport subscale of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, 46 then the patient is eligible for participation. If at any point during this initial screening process the patient does not meet the inclusion criteria (eg, score of 26 points on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool), the screening process ends, and the EMR displays a message that thanks the patient for completing the forms. Unlike a traditional RCT, which usually requires the patient to complete all patient-reported outcome measures, the POC-CT relies on the algorithm within the EMR to screen patients in real time and only asks them to complete the next patient-reported outcome measure if they met the inclusion criteria for the previous form ( Figure 1 ). This real-time analysis limits the time each patient spends on the screening process, does not require the clinician or a research team member to facilitate the process, and improves the efficiency of the process.

The EMR then flags patients who fit the patient-reported inclusion criteria of the POC-CT and notifies the clinician. At this point, the clinician approaches the patient and performs a clinical examination, including range of motion, strength, balance, and functional activities, as dictated by usual care and current evidence. 50 , 51 If, based on the clinical examination and study protocol, the patient may benefit from a joint-mobilization treatment protocol, the clinician describes the study and asks if the patient would like to participate. Figure 3 is a screenshot of the clinician's view in the EMR that shows a summary of the screening and enrollment status of patients. If the patient agrees to participate in the study, he or she provides informed consent and is enrolled and automatically randomized by the EMR into 1 of 2 treatment groups based on a predefined algorithm 21 , 22 (see next subsection for additional information related to assignment of participants). If the patient decides not to participate in the study, the clinician proceeds with the usual care and determines the most appropriate intervention based on clinical judgment. To preserve the usual clinical experience of the patient and clinician, every attempt should be made to recruit each eligible patient seen by the clinician so that these processes become a standard component of patient care. 20 , 22 These processes are completed in real time through the EMR and without prompting by the patient, clinician, or member of a research team, thereby minimizing the overall burden of the study ( Figure 1 ).

Screenshot of a clinician's view in an electronic medical record illustrating the enrollment status of patients.

To preserve the clinician's focus on delivery of care, the EMR is designed to capture study measurements that characterize the effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of an intervention as part of routine patient care. 21 , 22 Additional clinical measurements that are commonly obtained in efficacy studies but considered beyond routine care should be limited. 21 , 22 For the CER example study involving Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations versus Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement, investigators would likely capture changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) via patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Disablement of the Physically Active 52 or the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, and measure changes in perceived joint instability. To facilitate the collection of these measures over the study period, automated notifications from the EMR can remind the patient and clinician that study-specific measurement periods are upcoming or due at predetermined time points (eg, 2 weeks, 1 year postintervention; Figure 1 ).

In addition to minimizing the intrusiveness of the study from the clinician's perspective, the use of the EMR should also limit the patient's burden. 21 , 22 Unlike the RCT, which typically requires patients to attend additional in-person follow-up visits for data collection, the POC-CT allows the patient to complete electronic forms or reports through the EMR from a remote location, such as home, or on a digital mobile device. Although data collection from a remote location differs from that in traditional research designs, the collection of patient-reported outcomes (eg, functional limitations or changes in HRQOL) is vital for assessing the effects of the intervention from the patient's perspective, determining clinical outcomes that are meaningful and important to the patient, and supporting the primary aims of CER efforts. 9 – 11

In summary, the EMR is essential to the POC-CT in providing a foundation to support studies at the point of care. When designed and used effectively for a POC-CT, the EMR can simultaneously support both patient care and research so that the typical clinical experiences of the patient and clinician are minimally affected. By using the EMR to screen, obtain consent from, randomize, and follow patients throughout the study protocol, many of the research processes of a traditional RCT are automated for a POC-CT. Thus, the effective use of an EMR during a POC-CT reduces the overall burden of the study, preserves the typical clinical experiences of the patient and clinician, and makes CER at the point of care more feasible.

The Use of Bayesian Statistics for an Adaptive Design

The second essential feature of the POC-CT is its Bayesian adaptive feature. Historically, frequentist statistics (based on the theory of infinite study replication) have dominated medical research methodologic design (eg, power analysis, sample-size recommendations) and statistical analysis (eg, hypothesis testing, P values). 53 – 56 The rigid approach of frequentist statistics has provided researchers with a reliable method of estimating population characteristics based on data collected from a sample of participants and has revolutionized medical research during the last century. 53 , 54 , 56 However, although the rigidity of this approach complements traditional research designs such as the RCT, experts 53 – 55 have argued that using the frequentist approach in CER is inefficient and impractical. Ironically, the greatest asset of the frequentist approach (its rigidity) may also be its greatest drawback for CER. For example, the real-life, uncontrolled setting of CER inherently produces more variability within the study which, under the frequentist approach, would require more participants to be enrolled in the study and result in increased study costs. 19 , 57 To cope with the inherent variability of CER, investigators have recommended the use of Bayesian statistics for these studies 19 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 58 – 60 and, more recently, for research in athletic training. 61 , 62

The defining characteristic of the Bayesian approach is its flexibility. 56 Unlike the frequentist approach, which makes inferences about population characteristics based solely on findings from the study sample, the Bayesian approach allows investigators to include previous and new findings from outside the study sample. 53 , 55 , 56 These 2 approaches also differ logistically. When using a frequentist approach, prior information is considered only during the design of a study but not during the study or data analysis. A Bayesian approach provides a formal mathematical method for combining prior information with current information during the design and conducting of the study and as part of the analysis. 50 , 52 Thus, the Bayesian approach allows investigators to update or “adapt” the design of an ongoing study as new information is accrued from the study or becomes available from other sources. 50 , 52 This adaptive feature plays an important role in the randomization of participants in a POC-CT and incorporates practical, ethical, and patient care benefits.

To highlight the benefits of a Bayesian approach, let us consider our CAI CER study example. The research question could be, “What is the probability that Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations are more effective for improving patient-reported outcomes in patients with CAI than Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement?” Without considering findings from previous studies and setting aside anecdotal evidence, the probability that 1 treatment protocol is superior to the other would be 50%. Using simple randomization, the allocation ratio for assigning study participants to 1 of the 2 treatment groups would be 1 : 1. That is, each participant would have an equal chance of being assigned to receive Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations or Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement. Initially, the Bayesian adaptive approach is similar to that of an RCT. However, a Bayesian approach allows adaptation of the allocation ratio as information is collected during the course of the study.

For example, after a predetermined number (“batch”) of participants has been enrolled, the data collected to that point are analyzed in real time to determine if 1 intervention is demonstrating better results than the other. 22 , 53 Based on prespecified criteria (eg, change in patient-reported outcomes scores that exceed the minimal clinically important difference), the randomization of study participants into treatment groups may be adjusted to favor what appears to be the better intervention. 63 , 64 Using our CAI example, if changes in the HRQOL scores after the first batch of 10 participants suggest that Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations are resulting in better study outcomes than the Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement, the allocation ratio may be readjusted to 3 : 2 (60% for the Maitland grade 3 joint-mobilization group, 40% for the Mulligan talocrural mobilization-with-movement group). 19 This updating process would continue throughout the study until a predetermined endpoint is achieved based on a predefined “stopping rule” with an acceptable type 1 error rate (false positive or reporting a difference when there is none). 20 , 22 , 24 , 25

Of course, the algorithm driving the adaptive process is not a simple count of “wins” and “losses.” It must incorporate potential predictors of treatment and failure, including known confounders and effect modifiers or unknown factors that may be identified by retrospectively reviewing the participants' complete medical records within the EMR. Propensity scores (model-based estimates of the probability of assignment to intervention arms based on all covariates) may be used in an adaptive manner. 65 In some cases, neither intervention (eg, Maitland grade 3 joint mobilization, Mulligan talocrural mobilization with movement) will be shown to be better, and the study is stopped. When that happens, other factors, such as the cost and time burden of the interventions, must be considered to determine the comparative effectiveness of the specified interventions. 19 , 22 For our example, if the Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations and Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement are equally effective in improving HRQOL, then the clinical recommendation would favor the treatment that would require less time or cost associated with the treatment.

From a research perspective, the integration of prior and new data can help reduce the number of patients needed in the study (ie, sample size) to determine effectiveness and contain overall costs. 25 , 58 , 66 In addition, the Bayesian adaptive nature of the POC-CT can offer ethical benefits related to protecting human participants. Any study involving 2 or more interventions will inherently pose an ethical concern of exposing patients to an inferior intervention. 67 However, within a Bayesian adaptive design, the constant updating of the allocation in favor of the better treatment helps to direct more patients to the superior intervention and fewer patients to the inferior intervention. 25 Further, the Bayesian adaptive design allows investigators to incorporate new interventions into the design of an ongoing study. 19 In our CAI example, the initial interventions were Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations and Mulligan talocrural mobilizations with movement. If, during our study, a new intervention (eg, multimodal rehabilitation) shows promising results for the treatment of patients with CAI, then the flexibility of the Bayesian design allows the new intervention to be added to the ongoing study. This type of flexibility is particularly useful in the health care system because of the regular introduction of new and promising interventions. 19 In fact, recent discussions have emphasized the need for more robust research designs, such as platform trials, 68 – 70 that can add and remove interventions in an ongoing manner to accommodate ever-changing treatment options and identify the best treatment for a specific condition.

Because it offers practical, ethical, and patient care advantages over the frequentist study design approach, the Bayesian adaptive design is becoming more common in medical research, and its use has been encouraged in the sports medicine community. 61 , 62 The advantages of this design align well with CER objectives and offer investigators the flexibility needed to conduct research at the point of care in a scientifically rigorous manner. Although the Bayesian approach is relatively new to the sports medicine community, athletic training researchers should consider its advantages, particularly when conducting a CER investigation.

Clinical Benefits of the POC-CT: A Path to a Learning Health Care System

Of the many benefits the POC-CT offers to scientific investigation, its promise lies in its potential to improve clinical practice and advance EBP efforts. One of the major barriers to current EBP initiatives is the inability to rapidly incorporate research evidence into routine patient care. However, this barrier can be addressed by using a customized EMR for routine patient care and incorporating a Bayesian adaptive design.

From a clinical viewpoint, the ability to readjust the allocation schedule of participants based on accumulated information increases the probability that more patients are assigned to the favored intervention over the course of the study. 19 , 22 Using our CAI example, the readjustment of group assignment to favor Maitland grade 3 joint mobilizations (assuming they displayed superior effectiveness) after the first batch of participants would ensure that more patients are assigned to the intervention that is producing better patient care outcomes. This real-time integration of accumulating research evidence is the essence of EBP and ensures that evidence is incorporated in routine patient care. 19

If a clinician is participating in a POC-CT and randomizing every willing patient, the adaptive allocation increases the probability that the majority of patients will receive a superior intervention. 25 The size of a participant batch in a POC-CT can vary. Incorporating Bayesian algorithms into a fully integrated EMR could introduce a layer of additional “intelligence” into the clinical decision-making process, whereby a “batch” may comprise 1 participant and the allocation ratio would be adjusted in real time after each participant . This approach would have a profound effect on patient care by facilitating the establishment of a “learning health care system,” whereby clinicians learn from each patient care experience and refine practice patterns in real time. 22 , 25 The consistent refinement and updating of the best available evidence is the essence of evidence-based medicine and improvement in patient care.

The use of an EMR and Bayesian adaptive design may prompt concerns that the POC-CT is replacing clinical expertise with computer algorithms. In a POC-CT, just as in an RCT, the treatments being studied are assumed to be effectively equivalent to one another (“clinical equipoise”) 67 ; based on the current evidence and clinical consensus, one intervention is not supported over another. 67 Thus, the EMR and Bayesian adaptive feature of a POC-CT should not be viewed as technology replacing the clinician but as tools aiding clinicians in their patient care decisions. In short, just as evidence in EBP does not supersede clinical expertise, features of the POC-CT do not supersede established clinical consensus or best practices.

In addition to preserving the patient's and clinician's usual clinical experience, the use of an EMR can accelerate the accumulation of CER evidence when the EMR is connected to a larger network. For example, the Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center research group is currently conducting a feasibility study comparing different insulin interventions using the POC-CT design at its Boston Veterans Affairs site. 22 Preliminary findings indicated that the POC-CT is a feasible approach and, because the infrastructure of obtaining informed consent, randomizing patients, documenting patient notes, and collecting outcomes data is already in place within the EMR, the research group can easily expand the study to either a small subset or all of the 1500 Veterans Affairs-affiliated sites using the same EMR for routine patient care documentation. 20 , 22 This interconnectedness among multiple sites through a centralized EMR provides researchers with the opportunity to conduct multisite POC-CTs, quickly aggregate data from a variety of diverse sites, and establish generalizable evidence to guide patient care. 12 , 13 , 15

Although the percentage of athletic trainers who document patient care through an EMR is unknown, the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network (AT-PBRN) 15 provides an EMR infrastructure that is similar in concept to the EMR infrastructure of the Veterans Affairs health care system. As an affiliate practice-based research network of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the AT-PBRN was developed to support successful POC-CTs, and it connects multiple clinical practice sites (currently more than 70) across the country through a Web-based EMR (CORE-AT EMR). 15 The EMR is fully integrated into routine care so that patients and clinicians regularly interact with it, and its customizability allows algorithms to be embedded that support aspects of the POC-CT, including the collection of patient-reported outcome measures and incorporation of a Bayesian adaptive design. Preliminary findings from the AT-PBRN suggested that patient care data can be reliably collected through the Web-based EMR and that data can be aggregated across sites to begin answering questions that are clinically relevant to athletic training practice. 15 , 71 , 72 Although the POC-CT is a novel approach to CER, the athletic training profession may be structurally positioned to begin conducting multisite research through the AT-PBRN, or other similar networks, using the POC-CT design.

CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS

As with any study design, potential challenges are associated with the POC-CT. The POC-CT offers a way for researchers to design more pragmatic studies, yet the optimization of internal validity is crucial. Potentially confounding factors must be documented and addressed if a POC-CT is to produce high-quality evidence.

As suggested by best practices for CER, it is also important to engage patient and clinicians in the planning and design process to ensure success of the study. 73 Patients and clinicians may identify practical real-life barriers that researchers had not considered. For example, the POC-CT aims to limit the patient burden by collecting study outcomes electronically, but Internet access may not be readily available to patients in some low socioeconomic and rural areas. Although recent data 74 showed that the majority of individuals in the US had access to the Internet (eg, 81% of adults making less than $30 000 a year and 78% of adults in rural communities), identifying alternative ways to collect study outcomes from patients who lack Internet access will be important to the success of each POC-CT.

The POC-CT aims to minimize the intrusiveness of a study on the clinical experiences of the patient and clinician; however, an ongoing study will inevitably impede the usual workflow. Thus, it will be important to gather input from clinicians to ensure that the ongoing study minimizes the overall effects on their clinical practice. Like all clinical research studies, the POC-CT relies on the comprehensive documentation of study findings by the clinician providing patient care. Recent evidence 75 suggested that athletic trainers did not document in a comprehensive manner. Common barriers to documentation include inadequate time and not knowing what to document. 76 From a POC-CT perspective, these barriers highlight both the need to design the EMR in a manner that offers clinicians an easy way to document their patient encounters during the study and the importance of training the clinicians on how and what to document. This is similar to a traditional RCT in which clinicians must be properly trained so that procedures, such as data collection and documentation and intervention delivery, are consistent across clinicians and study sites. 77 In short, although the POC-CT offers a method of studying interventions at the point of care, many of the considerations and barriers associated with the traditional RCT must also be considered when designing a POC-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

As health care professionals seeking to provide the best possible patient care, athletic training researchers and clinicians must work together to facilitate EBP. One of the greatest barriers to adopting EBP is a lack of practice-based evidence that can be applied to an athletic trainer's decision-making process. Because the POC-CT encompasses the basic tenets of practice-based research, in which studies are conducted at the point of care, in real-life settings, and during the routine course of clinical practice, it is an ideal mechanism for facilitating the collection of patient care data and providing practice-based evidence. The POC-CT combines the better elements of both RCT and observational study designs to overcome the flaws inherent in each. In essence, the POC-CT is a randomized, quasi-observational study that helps to minimize bias and implementation at the point of care while limiting cost and improving the generalizability of the findings. 22 , 25 Thus, because the POC-CT encompasses the basic tenets of practice-based research, its findings may be incorporated into clinical practice more readily than findings from traditional research designs. 20 – 22 , 24 , 25 By using a fully integrated EMR and a Bayesian adaptive design, a POC-CT can be integrated seamlessly into daily practice in such a way that new patients enrolled in the study will be more likely to receive a superior intervention. This research design appears to be a promising new approach that the sports medicine community should consider and use to support CER and EBP initiatives.

Initiatives

Our community.

• Education & Admissions

Sports Medicine Research

Our researchers are driving high impact innovation.

The Ohio State Sports Medicine Research Institute is comprised of faculty from Orthopaedics, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine and Physical Therapy and colleagues in the College of Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine. We collaborate extensively on research that is fully integrated with our clinical operations, leverages our partnership with the Ohio State Department of Athletics and is of benefit to the university. If you have an interest in or question regarding our research projects, please contact [email protected] .

Join the SMRI

The Sports Medicine Research Institute (SMRI) facilitates research from many disciplines at The Ohio State University to enhance physical activity across the lifespan. SMRI provides infrastructure support for our research teams, standard operating procedures, educational programs and funding opportunities.

Ohio State researchers interested in joining can learn more about membership criteria and benefits or apply for membership online.

Our research facilities and team members

Recent research news.

Ohio State Launches First-of-its-Kind Comprehensive Esports Program

New Procedure Helps Patients Avoid Hip Replacement

Potential Key to Preventing Back Pain in Runners

Study Reveals Compression Tights Don't Help Runners Reach Finish Line

Study Aims to Get to the Point of Dry Needling for Knee Pain

Ohio State Surgeons Implant Knee Cartilage

Brain Needs Retrained After ACL Injury

New Surgical Technique Helps Make Achilles Tendon Repairs Stronger, Safer

Ohio State First to Use Plastic Meniscus Implant in FDA Clinical Trial

Study: Girls at Higher Risk for Overuse Injuries in High School Sports

Low BMI Can Increase Risk of Stress Fractures in Female Runners, Study Finds

Helpful Links

• Research Labs
• Our Researchers
• Center for Clinical & Translational Science

Masks Strongly Recommended but Not Required in Maryland, Starting Immediately

Due to the downward trend in respiratory viruses in Maryland, masking is no longer required but remains strongly recommended in Johns Hopkins Medicine clinical locations in Maryland. Read more .

• Vaccines  
• Masking Guidelines
• Visitor Guidelines  

Sports Medicine at Johns Hopkins

Don't Get Sidelined By Your Injury

Whether you developed your injury training for your first 5K or during a collegiate sports tournament, our sports medicine experts are here to help get you back in action. Johns Hopkins Medicine provides sports medicine care and treatment to professional and recreational athletes of all ages and skill levels.

In this section:

Our Approach | Conditions We Treat | Specialty Programs | Patient Resources | Patient Stories

How We Approach Sports Injuries

Our multi-specialty team includes primary care sports medicine physicians, sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons and specially trained physical and occupational therapists who work together to offer you a tailored plan for returning to the sport or activity you love.

Primary Care Sports Medicine

Our primary care sports medicine doctors diagnose sports injuries, provide nonsurgical treatments, such as joint injections, and consult on ways to prevent injury and improve your performance. They monitor your recovery and coordinate care with other specialists, including imaging, nutrition, rehabilitation therapy and surgery.

Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgery

Our sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons offer surgical procedures to address injuries that did not improve after other treatments. They also perform joint injections.

Rehabilitation Therapy for Sports Injuries

Our physical and occupational therapists help you get back in the game by improving your form, strengthening your body or helping the injured tissues heal. They also help you physically prepare for and recover after surgery.

Schedule an Appointment

Existing patients can schedule appointments online through MyChart .

443-997-5476

443-997-2663

Our Specialty Programs

• Cartilage Regeneration
• Golf Rehabilitation
• Hip Preservation
• Pediatric Sports Medicine
• Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections
• Rehabilitation for Performing Artists
• Running Clinic
• Soccer Injury Rehabilitation
• Women's Sports Medicine

Conditions We Treat

Foot and ankle.

• Ankle instability / sprains
• Achilles tendon injuries
• Plantar fasciitis
• Foot and ankle fractures
• Foot and ankle arthritis
• Ankle tendonitis, including Achilles tendonitis
• Bunions , hammer toe & deformities

Hip and Knee

• Ligament injuries to the knee , including  ACL tears
• Hip bursitis
• Hip (femoroacetabular) impingement
• Hip arthritis
• Hip labral tear
• Meniscus tear
• Osgood-Schlatter disease
• Patellar instability , dislocation and subluxation
• Patellar tendon rupture
• Runner’s knee (patellofemoral pain syndrome)
• Jumper’s knee (patellar tendonitis)
• Kneecap fractures (patella fractures)

Shoulder and Elbow

• Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries
• Shoulder arthritis
• Baseball-related shoulder injuries
• Clavicle fracture (broken collarbone)
• Labral tear of the shoulder
• Rotator cuff injuries
• Shoulder instability , dislocation and subluxation
• Rotator cuff tendinitis  or tendinopathy
• Shoulder bursitis
• Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis)
• Golfer’s and baseball elbow (medial epicondylitis)
• Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears

Head, Neck and Spine

• Cervical fractures and dislocations
• Cervical sprains
• Lowerback strains  and sprains

Hand and Wrist

• Carpal tunnel
• Hand & wrist fractures
• Trigger finger
• Wrist sprains
• Skier’s thumb (injury to the ligament at the base of the thumb)
• De Quervain’s tenosynovitis

Hear From Our Patients

Meniscus Surgery | Grace's Story

Elbow Surgery | Michael's Story

ACL Tear | Michelle's Story

Patient Resources

• 10 Tips for Preventing Sports Injuries in Kids and Teens
• Webinar: Common Sports and Activity-Related Injuries
• Common Dance Injuries and Prevention Tips
• Preventing Sports Injuries
• SLAP Tear Prevention Tips for Baseball and Softball Players
• Sports Injuries
• Sports Safety
• Sports Safety for Children

For Health care professionals Sports Medicine Training and Education

Johns Hopkins offers several training programs for physicians and physical therapists interested in specializing in sports medicine. These programs are led by our knowledgeable and experienced faculty who teach our high standards of care to the next generation of clinicians. As educators, they are always on top of the latest research and clinical guidelines in the field, making sure our patients get the best care possible.

Sports Medicine Physiatry Fellowship

Sports medicine physical therapy ceu series, sports physical therapy residency, performing arts fellowship for physical therapists, women's sports medicine summer internship.

• Accreditations
• Services Overview

Consultation

• COVID-19 Testing

Leading Edge Testing and Labs

The Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory (SMRTL) provides tests for the presence of performance-enhancing substances and common substances of abuse. SMRTL conducts comprehensive testing for anti-doping programs including international, national, and professional organizations, e.g. Olympic, Collegiate, Professional Sport Leagues, and Federal & State Departments.

Our Mission

Deliver the highest quality results with an unquestioned chain of custody that supports the needs of the client throughout the testing lifecycle.

Our Services

Testing services and consultation tailored to the needs of your program. Multi-matrix sample collection methods and test kits that best-fit the dynamic nature of your organization. SMRTL is here to provide the expertise and support needed for our clients.

Please contact us to discover more about our organization, value chain partnerships, and to obtain a detailed proposal based on your requirements and objectives.

Standard Tests

These tests cover the most common substance investigations on the market optimized for quick turnaround.

Specialty Test

Customized panel of testing fits the exact needs of our customers. Investigation into secondary substances using proven methods.

Delivering results through portal access or customized delivery based on client requirements.

Decades of experience to deliver the guidance and support to customers to develop and sustain a thriving testing program.

Accreditations & Standards

Get directions

Contact & Appointments

• Article Information

Data Sharing Statement

• As Ozempic’s Popularity Soars, Here’s What to Know About Semaglutide and Weight Loss JAMA Medical News & Perspectives May 16, 2023 This Medical News article discusses chronic weight management with semaglutide, sold under the brand names Ozempic and Wegovy. Melissa Suran, PhD, MSJ
• Patents and Regulatory Exclusivities on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists JAMA Special Communication August 15, 2023 This Special Communication used data from the US Food and Drug Administration to analyze how manufacturers of brand-name glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have used patent and regulatory systems to extend periods of market exclusivity. Rasha Alhiary, PharmD; Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH; Sarah Gabriele, LLM, MBE; Reed F. Beall, PhD; S. Sean Tu, JD, PhD; William B. Feldman, MD, DPhil, MPH
• What to Know About Wegovy’s Rare but Serious Adverse Effects JAMA Medical News & Perspectives December 12, 2023 This Medical News article discusses Wegovy, Ozempic, and other GLP-1 receptor agonists used for weight management and type 2 diabetes. Kate Ruder, MSJ
• GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Gastrointestinal Adverse Events—Reply JAMA Comment & Response March 12, 2024 Ramin Rezaeianzadeh, BSc; Mohit Sodhi, MSc; Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, MSc
• GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Gastrointestinal Adverse Events JAMA Comment & Response March 12, 2024 Karine Suissa, PhD; Sara J. Cromer, MD; Elisabetta Patorno, MD, DrPH
• GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Postoperative Complications JAMA Research Letter May 21, 2024 This cohort study evaluates the risk of postoperative respiratory complications among patients with diabetes undergoing surgery who had vs those who had not a prescription fill for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Anjali A. Dixit, MD, MPH; Brian T. Bateman, MD, MS; Mary T. Hawn, MD, MPH; Michelle C. Odden, PhD; Eric C. Sun, MD, PhD
• Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Gallbladder and Biliary Diseases JAMA Internal Medicine Original Investigation May 1, 2022 This systematic review and meta-analysis of 76 randomized clinical trials examines the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use on the risk of gallbladder and biliary diseases. Liyun He, MM; Jialu Wang, MM; Fan Ping, MD; Na Yang, MM; Jingyue Huang, MM; Yuxiu Li, MD; Lingling Xu, MD; Wei Li, MD; Huabing Zhang, MD
• Cholecystitis Associated With the Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists JAMA Internal Medicine Research Letter October 1, 2022 This case series identifies cases reported in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System of acute cholecystitis associated with use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists that did not have gallbladder disease warnings in their labeling. Daniel Woronow, MD; Christine Chamberlain, PharmD; Ali Niak, MD; Mark Avigan, MDCM; Monika Houstoun, PharmD, MPH; Cindy Kortepeter, PharmD

See More About

Select your interests.

Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.

• Academic Medicine
• Acid Base, Electrolytes, Fluids
• Allergy and Clinical Immunology
• American Indian or Alaska Natives
• Anesthesiology
• Anticoagulation
• Art and Images in Psychiatry
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assisted Reproduction
• Bleeding and Transfusion
• Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
• Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography
• Climate and Health
• Climate Change
• Clinical Challenge
• Clinical Decision Support
• Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience
• Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology
• Complementary and Alternative Medicine
• Consensus Statements
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Critical Care Medicine
• Cultural Competency
• Dental Medicine
• Dermatology
• Diabetes and Endocrinology
• Diagnostic Test Interpretation
• Drug Development
• Electronic Health Records
• Emergency Medicine
• End of Life, Hospice, Palliative Care
• Environmental Health
• Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
• Facial Plastic Surgery
• Gastroenterology and Hepatology
• Genetics and Genomics
• Genomics and Precision Health
• Global Health
• Guide to Statistics and Methods
• Hair Disorders
• Health Care Delivery Models
• Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment
• Health Care Quality
• Health Care Reform
• Health Care Safety
• Health Care Workforce
• Health Disparities
• Health Inequities
• Health Policy
• Health Systems Science
• History of Medicine
• Hypertension
• Images in Neurology
• Implementation Science
• Infectious Diseases
• Innovations in Health Care Delivery
• JAMA Infographic
• Law and Medicine
• Leading Change
• Less is More
• LGBTQIA Medicine
• Lifestyle Behaviors
• Medical Coding
• Medical Devices and Equipment
• Medical Education
• Medical Education and Training
• Medical Journals and Publishing
• Mobile Health and Telemedicine
• Narrative Medicine
• Neuroscience and Psychiatry
• Notable Notes
• Nutrition, Obesity, Exercise
• Obstetrics and Gynecology
• Occupational Health
• Ophthalmology
• Orthopedics
• Otolaryngology
• Pain Medicine
• Palliative Care
• Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
• Patient Care
• Patient Information
• Performance Improvement
• Performance Measures
• Perioperative Care and Consultation
• Pharmacoeconomics
• Pharmacoepidemiology
• Pharmacogenetics
• Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology
• Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• Physical Therapy
• Physician Leadership
• Population Health
• Primary Care
• Professional Well-being
• Professionalism
• Psychiatry and Behavioral Health
• Public Health
• Pulmonary Medicine
• Regulatory Agencies
• Reproductive Health
• Research, Methods, Statistics
• Resuscitation
• Rheumatology
• Risk Management
• Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine
• Shared Decision Making and Communication
• Sleep Medicine
• Sports Medicine
• Stem Cell Transplantation
• Substance Use and Addiction Medicine
• Surgical Innovation
• Surgical Pearls
• Teachable Moment
• Technology and Finance
• The Art of JAMA
• The Arts and Medicine
• The Rational Clinical Examination
• Tobacco and e-Cigarettes
• Translational Medicine
• Trauma and Injury
• Treatment Adherence
• Ultrasonography
• Users' Guide to the Medical Literature
• Vaccination
• Venous Thromboembolism
• Veterans Health
• Women's Health
• Workflow and Process
• Wound Care, Infection, Healing

Others Also Liked

• Download PDF
• X Facebook More LinkedIn

Sodhi M , Rezaeianzadeh R , Kezouh A , Etminan M. Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss. JAMA. 2023;330(18):1795–1797. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19574

Manage citations:

© 2024

• Permissions

Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss

• 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
• 2 StatExpert Ltd, Laval, Quebec, Canada
• 3 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
• Medical News & Perspectives As Ozempic’s Popularity Soars, Here’s What to Know About Semaglutide and Weight Loss Melissa Suran, PhD, MSJ JAMA
• Special Communication Patents and Regulatory Exclusivities on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Rasha Alhiary, PharmD; Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH; Sarah Gabriele, LLM, MBE; Reed F. Beall, PhD; S. Sean Tu, JD, PhD; William B. Feldman, MD, DPhil, MPH JAMA
• Medical News & Perspectives What to Know About Wegovy’s Rare but Serious Adverse Effects Kate Ruder, MSJ JAMA
• Comment & Response GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Gastrointestinal Adverse Events—Reply Ramin Rezaeianzadeh, BSc; Mohit Sodhi, MSc; Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, MSc JAMA
• Comment & Response GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Karine Suissa, PhD; Sara J. Cromer, MD; Elisabetta Patorno, MD, DrPH JAMA
• Research Letter GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Postoperative Complications Anjali A. Dixit, MD, MPH; Brian T. Bateman, MD, MS; Mary T. Hawn, MD, MPH; Michelle C. Odden, PhD; Eric C. Sun, MD, PhD JAMA
• Original Investigation Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Gallbladder and Biliary Diseases Liyun He, MM; Jialu Wang, MM; Fan Ping, MD; Na Yang, MM; Jingyue Huang, MM; Yuxiu Li, MD; Lingling Xu, MD; Wei Li, MD; Huabing Zhang, MD JAMA Internal Medicine
• Research Letter Cholecystitis Associated With the Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Daniel Woronow, MD; Christine Chamberlain, PharmD; Ali Niak, MD; Mark Avigan, MDCM; Monika Houstoun, PharmD, MPH; Cindy Kortepeter, PharmD JAMA Internal Medicine

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are medications approved for treatment of diabetes that recently have also been used off label for weight loss. 1 Studies have found increased risks of gastrointestinal adverse events (biliary disease, 2 pancreatitis, 3 bowel obstruction, 4 and gastroparesis 5 ) in patients with diabetes. 2 - 5 Because such patients have higher baseline risk for gastrointestinal adverse events, risk in patients taking these drugs for other indications may differ. Randomized trials examining efficacy of GLP-1 agonists for weight loss were not designed to capture these events 2 due to small sample sizes and short follow-up. We examined gastrointestinal adverse events associated with GLP-1 agonists used for weight loss in a clinical setting.

We used a random sample of 16 million patients (2006-2020) from the PharMetrics Plus for Academics database (IQVIA), a large health claims database that captures 93% of all outpatient prescriptions and physician diagnoses in the US through the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) or ICD-10. In our cohort study, we included new users of semaglutide or liraglutide, 2 main GLP-1 agonists, and the active comparator bupropion-naltrexone, a weight loss agent unrelated to GLP-1 agonists. Because semaglutide was marketed for weight loss after the study period (2021), we ensured all GLP-1 agonist and bupropion-naltrexone users had an obesity code in the 90 days prior or up to 30 days after cohort entry, excluding those with a diabetes or antidiabetic drug code.

Patients were observed from first prescription of a study drug to first mutually exclusive incidence (defined as first ICD-9 or ICD-10 code) of biliary disease (including cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and choledocholithiasis), pancreatitis (including gallstone pancreatitis), bowel obstruction, or gastroparesis (defined as use of a code or a promotility agent). They were followed up to the end of the study period (June 2020) or censored during a switch. Hazard ratios (HRs) from a Cox model were adjusted for age, sex, alcohol use, smoking, hyperlipidemia, abdominal surgery in the previous 30 days, and geographic location, which were identified as common cause variables or risk factors. 6 Two sensitivity analyses were undertaken, one excluding hyperlipidemia (because more semaglutide users had hyperlipidemia) and another including patients without diabetes regardless of having an obesity code. Due to absence of data on body mass index (BMI), the E-value was used to examine how strong unmeasured confounding would need to be to negate observed results, with E-value HRs of at least 2 indicating BMI is unlikely to change study results. Statistical significance was defined as 2-sided 95% CI that did not cross 1. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4. Ethics approval was obtained by the University of British Columbia’s clinical research ethics board with a waiver of informed consent.

Our cohort included 4144 liraglutide, 613 semaglutide, and 654 bupropion-naltrexone users. Incidence rates for the 4 outcomes were elevated among GLP-1 agonists compared with bupropion-naltrexone users ( Table 1 ). For example, incidence of biliary disease (per 1000 person-years) was 11.7 for semaglutide, 18.6 for liraglutide, and 12.6 for bupropion-naltrexone and 4.6, 7.9, and 1.0, respectively, for pancreatitis.

Use of GLP-1 agonists compared with bupropion-naltrexone was associated with increased risk of pancreatitis (adjusted HR, 9.09 [95% CI, 1.25-66.00]), bowel obstruction (HR, 4.22 [95% CI, 1.02-17.40]), and gastroparesis (HR, 3.67 [95% CI, 1.15-11.90) but not biliary disease (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.89-2.53]). Exclusion of hyperlipidemia from the analysis did not change the results ( Table 2 ). Inclusion of GLP-1 agonists regardless of history of obesity reduced HRs and narrowed CIs but did not change the significance of the results ( Table 2 ). E-value HRs did not suggest potential confounding by BMI.

This study found that use of GLP-1 agonists for weight loss compared with use of bupropion-naltrexone was associated with increased risk of pancreatitis, gastroparesis, and bowel obstruction but not biliary disease.

Given the wide use of these drugs, these adverse events, although rare, must be considered by patients who are contemplating using the drugs for weight loss because the risk-benefit calculus for this group might differ from that of those who use them for diabetes. Limitations include that although all GLP-1 agonist users had a record for obesity without diabetes, whether GLP-1 agonists were all used for weight loss is uncertain.

Accepted for Publication: September 11, 2023.

Published Online: October 5, 2023. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19574

Correction: This article was corrected on December 21, 2023, to update the full name of the database used.

Corresponding Author: Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, MSc, Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Medicine, The Eye Care Center, University of British Columbia, 2550 Willow St, Room 323, Vancouver, BC V5Z 3N9, Canada ( [email protected] ).

Author Contributions: Dr Etminan had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Sodhi, Rezaeianzadeh, Etminan.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Sodhi, Rezaeianzadeh, Etminan.

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Kezouh.

Obtained funding: Etminan.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Sodhi.

Supervision: Etminan.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by internal research funds from the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement .

• Register for email alerts with links to free full-text articles
• Access PDFs of free articles
• Manage your interests
• Save searches and receive search alerts

Leadership and Governance

Msu health care facts, partnerships, affiliate clinics, make an appointment, sign-in or sign-up for the portal, pay my bill, request medical records, find a location, refill or transfer a prescription, find an imaging location, view all patient resources, refer a patient, primary care, family medicine, internal medicine, specialty care, adult specialty care, cancer care, digestive care, heart and vascular care, neurological care, pediatric specialty care, sports and movement care, surgical care, diagnostic and support care, private duty home care, pulmonary function laboratory.

Looking for something else?

• Explore all services →
• Explore our locations →
• Learn about our providers →

Patient Resources

Compliments, concerns, questions and suggestions, financial services, health care non-discrimination notice, language assistance services, patient rights, health and community resources, symptom checker, healthcare professionals resources, referring guidelines.

• About MyMSUHealth
• MyMSUHealth
• How to Register for MyMSUHealth
• Support for MyMSUHealth

Schedule NOW Uniting for Neurological Care

MSU Health Care and University of Michigan Health-Sparrow form joint operating agreement to expand neurological care in mid-Michigan

NOTICE: US-127 road construction traffic detour information from MDOT . 

FIND A PROVIDER

Our convenient provider search directory can help you find the perfect Spartan provider for you.

Featured News

Healthcare misconceptions from 98 healthcare executives.

Aug 14, 2024

Panian Named New Senior Director of Revenue Cycle

Aug 13, 2024

MSU advances rural health care through education and innovation

Aug 12, 2024

Punching back against Parkinson's Disease

Zenden for nurses arrives at msu health care.

Aug 8, 2024

Featured Events

Sports injury saturday walk-in clinic, 2024 capital city river run, your health.

Find medically reviewed information on symptoms, treatments, conditions, and more.

Our Saturday Injury Clinic returns on August 17

Our walk-in clinic is EXCLUSIVELY FOR ATHLETES with acute sports-related injuries throughout the school year.

90-Day Prescriptions Filled

Easily transfer your prescription online to MSU Health Care Pharmacy

Capital City River Run Official Medical Provider

Register to join us in downtown Lansing on September 21-22, 2024.

40 Facts About Tolyatti

Written by Elfreda Solberg

Modified & Updated: 25 Jun 2024

Reviewed by Sherman Smith

• Automotive Industry Facts
• Russian Federation Facts
• Soviet Union Facts
• Volga River Facts

Tolyatti, situated on the banks of the beautiful Volga River, is a city that holds a plethora of fascinating facts and captivating stories. Located in the Samara Oblast of Russia, Tolyatti is not only known for its picturesque landscapes but also for its rich history and vibrant culture. As one of the largest cities in the country, Tolyatti has a population of over 700,000 people, making it a bustling hub of activity and a significant industrial center.

From being home to one of the largest automobile plants in Russia to having a diverse range of cultural attractions, Tolyatti offers a unique blend of modernity and tradition. In this article, we will delve into 40 intriguing facts about Tolyatti, uncovering the hidden gems that make this city truly special. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready to embark on a journey to discover the enchanting secrets of Tolyatti!

Key Takeaways:

• Tolyatti, the “automobile capital” of Russia, is a vibrant city with a rich cultural heritage, strong sports tradition, and a thriving automotive industry. It offers a diverse culinary scene, beautiful nature, and a welcoming community.
• With a population exceeding 700,000, Tolyatti is known for its strong focus on innovation, vibrant music and nightlife scenes, and a low crime rate. The city embraces technology, supports entrepreneurship, and has a growing film industry.

Tolyatti is the largest city in the Samara Oblast.

Tolyatti is a vibrant city located in the Samara Oblast of Russia. Covering an area of approximately 314 square kilometers, it is known as the “automobile capital” of Russia.

The city was founded in 1737 as a fortress.

Tolyatti was originally established as a fortress by the Russian Empire in 1737 to protect their territory from nomadic tribes .

The city was renamed Tolyatti in 1964.

Prior to 1964, Tolyatti was known as Stavropol-on-Volga. The city was renamed in honor of the Italian communist leader , Palmiro Togliatti.

Tolyatti is home to the largest car manufacturing plant in Russia.

The AvtoVAZ car factory, known for producing the iconic Lada vehicles, is located in Tolyatti. It is one of the city’s major economic contributors .

The Volga River flows through Tolyatti.

Tolyatti is situated on the banks of the Volga River , the longest river in Europe. The picturesque river adds to the natural beauty of the city .

Tolyatti has a population of over 700,000 people.

With a population exceeding 700,000 residents, Tolyatti is a bustling city with a diverse and vibrant community.

Tolyatti experiences a humid continental climate.

The city has distinct seasons, with cold winters and warm summers. The average temperature in January, the coldest month, is around -10 degrees Celsius , while in July, the warmest month, it can reach up to 25 degrees Celsius.

Tolyatti is known for its thriving automotive industry.

As the “automobile capital” of Russia, Tolyatti plays a significant role in the country’s automotive industry. It is home to various car manufacturing and engineering companies.

The city has a rich sports culture.

Tolyatti has a strong sports tradition, with ice hockey, football, and volleyball being popular among its residents. The city has professional teams competing at national and international levels.

Tolyatti is a major tourist destination in Russia.

With its beautiful landscapes , historical sites, and cultural attractions, Tolyatti attracts visitors from all over the world. Its proximity to the Volga River offers opportunities for water activities as well.

Tolyatti has several parks and green spaces.

The city is known for its abundance of parks and green spaces, providing residents and visitors with recreational areas for relaxation and outdoor activities.

The city has a well-developed transportation system.

Tolyatti has an extensive network of roads, buses, and taxis, making it convenient for residents and tourists to navigate throughout the city.

Tolyatti has a rich cultural heritage.

The city has numerous museums, theaters, and art galleries, showcasing its cultural diversity and history.

Tolyatti is home to the Zhiguli Museum of Automobile History.

The Zhiguli Museum offers a fascinating glimpse into the history of automobile manufacturing in Tolyatti and the development of the iconic Lada brand.

Tolyatti hosts the International Film Festival Kinoshock.

Each year, Tolyatti plays host to the Kinoshock International Film Festival, attracting filmmakers and cinema enthusiasts from around the world.

The city has a thriving nightlife scene.

Tolyatti boasts a variety of clubs, bars, and restaurants, offering entertainment options for locals and tourists to enjoy.

Tolyatti is known for its contemporary architecture.

The city showcases modern architectural designs, with several striking buildings and structures that add to its skyline.

Tolyatti has a strong educational system.

The city is home to numerous educational institutions, including universities, colleges, and schools, providing quality education to its residents.

Tolyatti has a diverse culinary scene.

The city offers a wide range of culinary delights, including traditional Russian dishes, international cuisine, and local specialties.

Tolyatti is a city of festivals.

Throughout the year, Tolyatti hosts various cultural, music, and sports festivals , adding to its vibrant atmosphere.

Tolyatti is known for its automotive-themed events.

The city organizes auto shows, rallies, and motor racing events, attracting enthusiasts and showcasing the latest advancements in the automotive industry.

Tolyatti has numerous shopping centers and markets.

Shopaholics can indulge in retail therapy at the city’s malls, boutiques, and traditional markets, offering a wide selection of products.

Tolyatti is surrounded by beautiful nature.

The city is blessed with picturesque landscapes, including forests, lakes, and nature reserves, providing opportunities for outdoor adventures.

Tolyatti has a strong sense of community.

The residents of Tolyatti are known for their warmth and hospitality, creating a close-knit and welcoming community.

Tolyatti is a hub for innovation and technology.

The city fosters technological advancements and innovation, attracting businesses and entrepreneurs in various sectors.

Tolyatti is home to the Tolyatti State University.

The Tolyatti State University offers a wide range of academic programs and research opportunities to students.

Tolyatti has a strong industrial base.

Aside from the automobile industry, the city is known for its production of machinery, chemicals, and other industrial products.

Tolyatti has a well-established healthcare system.

The city provides quality healthcare services, with modern hospitals, clinics, and medical facilities catering to the needs of its residents.

Tolyatti has a low crime rate.

The city has implemented effective measures to ensure the safety and security of its residents, resulting in a relatively low crime rate.

Tolyatti has a vibrant music scene.

The city hosts numerous music festivals, concerts, and performances, showcasing both local talent and renowned artists.

Tolyatti is known for its vibrant street art.

The city is adorned with colorful murals and graffiti, adding character and creativity to its streets.

Tolyatti is a major center for water sports.

With its proximity to the Volga River and surrounding lakes, Tolyatti offers opportunities for boating, fishing, and other water-based activities.

Tolyatti has a strong environmental focus.

The city is committed to sustainability and ecological preservation, implementing initiatives to protect its natural surroundings.

Tolyatti is well-connected to other major cities.

The city has excellent transportation links, including rail connections and an international airport, facilitating travel to and from Tolyatti.

Tolyatti is a center for engineering and technical expertise.

The city has a strong focus on engineering and technical education, producing skilled professionals in various fields.

Tolyatti is known for its annual motor show.

The city hosts an annual motor show, showcasing the latest advancements in automotive technology and attracting car enthusiasts from far and wide.

Tolyatti has a strong cultural identity.

With its rich history and diverse population, Tolyatti has developed a unique cultural identity that is celebrated throughout the city.

Tolyatti has a growing film industry.

The city has been the backdrop for various film productions, and its thriving film industry continues to grow in popularity.

Tolyatti is a city of innovation and entrepreneurship.

The city supports and encourages startups and entrepreneurial ventures, creating a dynamic business environment.

Tolyatti is a city that embraces technology.

With a strong focus on innovation, Tolyatti utilizes technology in various sectors, enhancing the quality of life for its residents.

In conclusion, Tolyatti is a fascinating city with a rich history and a vibrant culture. From its origins as a planned industrial city to its modern developments and attractions, Tolyatti offers a unique blend of tradition and progress. With its picturesque location on the Volga River and its numerous landmarks and points of interest, Tolyatti is a destination worth exploring.Whether you’re interested in automotive history, nature, or simply experiencing the local lifestyle, Tolyatti has something for everyone. Make sure to visit the AvtoVAZ museum to learn about the city’s automotive heritage and the Tolyatti Embankment for stunning views of the Volga River.With its friendly locals, delicious cuisine, and diverse range of activities, Tolyatti promises an unforgettable experience. So, pack your bags and get ready to discover the wonders of this hidden gem in Russia. Tolyatti awaits!

1. What is the population of Tolyatti?

Tolyatti has a population of approximately 700,000 people.

2. How do I travel to Tolyatti?

Tolyatti is well-connected by air, rail, and road. The city has its own international airport, and there are regular train and bus services from major Russian cities.

3. Are there any famous landmarks in Tolyatti?

Yes, Tolyatti is home to several iconic landmarks such as the AvtoVAZ museum, the Tolyatti Embankment, and the Kuibyshev Square.

4. What is the climate like in Tolyatti?

Tolyatti has a temperate continental climate with hot summers and cold winters. The best time to visit is during the spring or autumn when the weather is pleasant.

5. What industries are prominent in Tolyatti?

Tolyatti is known for its automotive industry, with AvtoVAZ being the largest car manufacturer in Russia. The city also has a growing technology sector .

6. Are there any natural attractions near Tolyatti?

Yes, Tolyatti is surrounded by beautiful natural landscapes. Visitors can explore the Zhigulevsky National Park, which offers hiking trails, scenic viewpoints, and diverse flora and fauna.

7. What are some popular local dishes in Tolyatti?

Tolyatti is known for its delicious cuisine. Some popular local dishes include pelmeni (meat dumplings), borsch ( beetroot soup), and syrniki (cheese pancakes).

Tolyatti's location along the mighty Volga River has shaped its history and culture. As Russia's automotive capital, Tolyatti is home to cutting-edge manufacturing plants that drive the nation's economy. Visitors can explore the city's fascinating museums, vibrant festivals, and stunning natural surroundings, making Tolyatti a must-see destination for anyone interested in discovering the heart of Russia. For more captivating facts about the region, dive into the mysteries of the Volga River , uncover the secrets behind Chrysler's success , and embark on a journey through the enchanting city of Orenburg .

Was this page helpful?

Our commitment to delivering trustworthy and engaging content is at the heart of what we do. Each fact on our site is contributed by real users like you, bringing a wealth of diverse insights and information. To ensure the highest standards of accuracy and reliability, our dedicated editors meticulously review each submission. This process guarantees that the facts we share are not only fascinating but also credible. Trust in our commitment to quality and authenticity as you explore and learn with us.

Share this Fact:

• Colleges in Texas
• Colleges in New York
• Colleges in California
• Colleges in Michigan
• Colleges in Massachusetts
• Colleges in Washington
• Colleges in Florida
• Colleges in Ohio
• Colleges in Georgia
• Colleges in Virginia
• Colleges in North Carolina
• Colleges in Pennsylvania
• Colleges in Illinois
• Colleges in Arizona
• Colleges in New Jersey
• United Kingdom
• Switzerland
• Why go to a Top College?
• Research Papers
• Achievements
• School Spirit

College Tiers

• The Cycle of Rankings
• Ranking Matters
• Top Universities in the World
• The Best University
• University Ranking Organizations
• Programs of Study
• Post College Earnings
• College Acronyms
• Choosing a College
• College Parties
• Ivy League Schools
• Trade School Versus College
• College Size
• Colleges Within Universities
• The Best Colleges
• Best Countries to Study Abroad
• Economical Colleges
• College Terms
• Community College to University Upgrade
• Accommodation
• Active Research
• Cost of College
• Updates to Listings
• College Scams
• International Student Scams
• US Colleges With Lowest Acceptance Rates
• College Enrollment is Dropping
• Financial Aid
• SAT versus ACT
• What Program should I take?
• Is College Worth It?
• Best College Promotional Videos
• Credential Evaluation Services
• Affirmative Action
• Open Universities
• Status Indian
• Best US Universities for Scholarships
• Best Canadian Universities for Scholarships
• Sports Scholarships
• College Sports Elevate You
• College Softball
• College Hockey
• College Baseball
• College Basketball
• College Football

Asian Togliatti State University (TSU) - University Ranking

Togliatti State University – Posted by University Ranking Organization

University Description (Ranking at bottom)

Togliatti University, officially known as Togliatti State University (TSU), is a higher education institution located in Togliatti, Russia.

TSU is a flagship university of Samara Region, the centre of innovative and technological development of the region, and the city-forming university of Togliatti. The history of TSU begins in 1951 when a branch of Kuibyshev Industrial Institute at Kuibyshevgidrostroy was opened in Stavropol (former name of Togliatti). In 1966, to provide personnel for the Volga automobile plant under construction, it was reorganized into the Togliatti Polytechnic Institute with the faculty of automotive engineering. In 1987, a branch of Kuibyshev State Pedagogical Institute was established in Togliatti – the first university centre for the Humanities in the city. On 29 May 2001, by a decision of the Government of the Russian Federation, Togliatti State University was established on the basis of these two institutions.

University Analysis

The university offers a wide range of bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degree programs in various fields of study, including humanities, natural sciences, engineering, economics, social sciences, and education. It has faculties and departments dedicated to these disciplines, providing specialized education and research opportunities.

Togliatti University is known for its emphasis on innovation and entrepreneurship. It collaborates with local and international industry partners to bridge the gap between academia and the business world, ensuring that students gain practical skills and knowledge to excel in their chosen fields.

The university campus includes modern facilities such as well-equipped laboratories, libraries, lecture halls, and computer centers. It also houses a student dormitory, sports complex, and recreational areas to cater to the needs of its student community.

Togliatti University is committed to promoting internationalization and offers exchange programs for students and faculty members. It has partnerships with universities and organizations worldwide, allowing students to study abroad and experience different cultures.

Additionally, the university actively participates in scientific research projects and hosts conferences, seminars, and workshops. It has published numerous research papers and actively contributes to the academic community.

Overall, Togliatti University is recognized as a leading educational institution in the Samara Oblast region of Russia. It strives to provide a high-quality education, promote research, and prepare students to become skilled professionals in their respective fields.

Togliatti University Website

Address: Belorusskaya Ulitsa, 14, Tolyatti, Samara Oblast, Russia, 445020

+7 848 254-64-24

Universities in: Russia . Geo Region: Asian and European . World University Ranking: Between 101-500, Tier 3 Colleges . .

• Print University
• Browse by…
• New Zealand
• Between 001-050, Tier 1 Colleges
• Between 051-100, Tier 2 Colleges
• Between 101-500, Tier 3 Colleges
• Between 501-1000, Tier 4 Colleges
• Greater than 1001
• Not Yet Ranked
• - British Columbia
• - Newfoundland
• - New Brunswick
• - Saskatchewan
• - Nova Scotia
• Netherlands
• Philippines
• United States
• - Louisiana
• - California
• - Minnesota
• - Connecticut
• - New Jersey
• - Pennsylvania
• - Road Island
• - Washington
• - Wisconsin
• - Tennessee
• - New Hampshire
• - North Carolina
• - Massachusetts
• - South Carolina
• - West Virginia

Colleges Near Me

Embrace the college spirit, what is the best college.