best introduction for research

Research Blog

How to write a research paper introduction (with examples).

I hope you enjoy reading this blog post.

If you would like to learn more about research, check out this  Research Course .

Welcome to our comprehensive guide on crafting the perfect introduction for your research paper. In this blog, we’ll explore the crucial elements of a strong introduction, highlight common pitfalls to avoid, and provide practical tips to effectively set the stage for your study’s objectives and significance. 

Table of Contents

Lack of a clear thesis statement, lack of clear objectives and scope, failure to establish the research significance, insufficient background information, inadequate literature review, ignoring the research gap, overly technical language, poor organization and flow, neglecting the audience, the importance of a good introduction.

A strong introduction sets the tone for the entire paper, guiding the reader through the research journey. It provides context, establishes relevance, and ensures the reader understands the importance of the study.

Starting a research project is exciting, but getting the introduction right is key. It’s like opening the door to your study and inviting readers in. However, there are some common missteps that can trip you up along the way.

Find the U.S. Research Position of your dreams!

Common mistakes to avoid.

A thesis statement is the central argument or claim that guides the entire research paper. It is a concise summary of the main point or claim of the paper and is typically found at the end of the introduction. A clear thesis statement helps to focus the research, provide direction, and inform the reader of the paper’s purpose. Expert reviewers may even skip the rest of the introduction (as they are well versed in the topic) and focus only on your thesis statement, so it’s vital to make sure it is perfect!

When a research introduction lacks a clear thesis statement, several issues can arise:

• Ambiguity : Without a clear thesis, the reader may be confused about the paper’s purpose and the main argument. Do not talk in vague terms. Whenever possible, use terminology established in recent literature. Narrow down the key aspects of the association that you are investigating (the study sample, the outcome and predictor measures) as much as possible.
• Lack of Focus : The paper can become unfocused and meander through unrelated topics, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument. Do not try to have more than 1-2 main aims in a paper. Even if you have done supplementary analysis, it is better to say so in the discussion. As a rule of thumb, try to answer one major question only!
• Weak Argumentation : A well-defined thesis provides a strong foundation for building arguments. Without it, the arguments may appear weak and unsupported.

Let's be more practical:

1- In this paper, I will discuss climate change.

• Problem: This statement is too broad and vague. It does not provide a clear direction or specific argument.

2- This paper argues that climate change, measured by global average temperature change, is primarily driven by human activities, such as deforestation and the burning of fossil fuels, and proposes policy measures to mitigate its impact.(1)

• Strengths: – Specificity : It clearly states that the paper will focus on human activities as the main drivers of climate change. – Argument : It presents a specific claim that the paper will argue. – Direction : It hints at the structure of the paper by mentioning policy measures.

If you would like to learn more about introductions and other aspects of clinical research, check out the Medical Research Course from the Match Guy here .

Powerful Tips:

• Be Specific : Clearly define the main argument or claim. Avoid vague or broad statements.
• Be Concise : Keep the thesis statement concise, ideally one to two sentences.
• Provide Direction : Indicate the structure of the paper by hinting at the main points that will be discussed.
• Revise as Needed : Be prepared to revise the thesis statement as your research progresses and your understanding deepens.

Transform research ideas into published papers!

A clear statement of objectives and scope is crucial in a research paper introduction because it outlines what the study aims to achieve and defines the boundaries within which the research will be conducted.

Example of Lacking Clear Objectives and Scope: This paper examines the impacts of climate change on agriculture.

• Problem : This statement is too broad and vague. It does not specify what aspects of climate change or agriculture will be studied, nor does it define the geographical or temporal scope.

Example with Clear Objectives and Scope: This study aims to investigate the effects of rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns on crop yields in the Midwest United States from 2000 to 2010. The objectives are to (1) assess the impact of temperature changes on corn and soybean yields, (2) analyze how variations in precipitation affect crop growth, and (3) identify adaptive strategies employed by farmers in the region.(2)

Powerful tips:

• Be Specific : Clearly state what the study aims to achieve and avoid vague or broad statements.
• Identify Key Areas : Outline the main areas or aspects that the research will focus on.
• Set Boundaries : Define the geographical, temporal, and conceptual boundaries of the research.
• List Objectives : Clearly articulate specific research objectives or questions that the study will address.
• Stay Realistic : Ensure that the objectives and scope are achievable within the constraints of the research project.
• Make it flow : Make sure you are not repeating the same concepts as the thesis statement, as these two sections are often presented back-to-back in the final paragraph of the introduction! Remember: the thesis statement is your hypothesis or question, and your objectives are ‘how’ you are going to test your thesis.

Master medical statistics and boost your productivity!

This mistake can result in the research appearing trivial or irrelevant, diminishing its potential impact. When the significance of the research is not well-established, readers may struggle to understand the value of the study and why they should care about it.

Example of Failure to Establish Research Significance: This study investigates the effects of social media usage on sleep patterns among teenagers.

• Problem : The significance of studying social media’s impact on sleep patterns is not explained. The reader may wonder why this research is important or what implications it has.

Example with Established Research Significance: This study investigates the effects of social media usage on sleep patterns among teenagers. Understanding this relationship is crucial because insufficient sleep is linked to numerous health issues, including decreased academic performance, heightened stress levels, and increased risk of mental health problems. With the pervasive use of social media among adolescents, identifying how it impacts sleep can inform strategies for promoting healthier habits and improving overall well-being in this vulnerable age group.(3)

• Link to Broader Issues : Connect the research topic to broader issues or trends that highlight its relevance and importance.
• Explain Practical Implications : Discuss the potential practical applications or benefits of the research findings.
• Address Gaps in Knowledge : Identify gaps in the existing literature that the research aims to fill.
• Highlight Potential Impact : Emphasize the potential impact of the research on the field, society, or specific populations.
• Use Concrete Examples : Provide concrete examples or scenarios to illustrate the significance of the research.

Feeling swamped by the complexities of Systematic Reviews?

Insufficient background information in the introduction of a research paper refers to failing to provide enough context for the reader to understand the research problem and its significance. Background information sets the stage for the research by offering necessary details about the topic, relevant theories, previous studies, and key terms.

This may lead to:

• Reader Confusion : Without adequate context, readers may struggle to understand the research question, its importance, and how it fits into the broader field of study.
• Weak Justification : Insufficient background can undermine the rationale for the research, making it difficult to justify why the study is necessary or valuable.
• Misinterpretation : Lack of context can lead to misinterpretation of the research objectives, methods, and findings.

Example of Insufficient Background Information: In recent years, many researchers have studied the effects of social media on teenagers. This paper explores the relationship between social media use and anxiety among teenagers.

• Problem : This introduction lacks specific details about the previous research, the theoretical framework, and key terms. It does not provide enough context for the reader to understand why the study is important.

Example of Adequate Background Information: Social media platforms have become an integral part of teenagers’ daily lives, with studies showing that 95% of teens have access to a smartphone and 45% are online almost constantly. Previous research has linked excessive social media use to various mental health issues, including anxiety and depression. However, the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. This paper explores the impact of social media use on anxiety levels among teenagers, focusing on the roles of social comparison and cyberbullying.(4)

If you would like to learn more about manuscript writing, check out the Comprehensive Research Course from the Match Guy here .

• Review Relevant Literature : Summarize key studies and theories related to your topic.
• Provide Context : Explain the broader context of your research problem.
• Define Key Terms : Ensure that any specialized terms or concepts are clearly defined.
• Identify the Research Gap : Highlight what is not yet known or understood about your topic.
• Be Concise : Provide enough information to set the stage without overwhelming the reader with details.

Getting No Replies from Institutions? Don't Stress!

This mistake can occur when the literature review is too brief, lacks depth, omits key studies, or fails to critically analyze previous work. An inadequate literature review can undermine the foundation of the research by failing to provide the necessary context and justification for the study.

Inadequate Literature Review: There has been some research on the relationship between exercise and mental health. This paper will investigate this relationship further.

• Problem : This review is too general and does not provide sufficient detail about the existing research or how it informs the current study.

Example with Adequate Literature Review: Research has consistently shown that regular physical activity has positive effects on mental health. For example, a study by Gujral et al. (2019) demonstrated that aerobic exercise can significantly reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety. Similarly, Smith and Lee (2020) found that strength training also contributes to improved mood and reduced stress levels. However, much of the existing research has focused on adult populations, with relatively few studies examining these effects in adolescents. Additionally, the specific types of exercise that are most beneficial for different mental health outcomes have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to explore the effects of various types of exercise on the mental health of high school students, thereby addressing these gaps in the literature.(5-6)

• Be Comprehensive : Review a broad range of studies related to the research topic to provide a thorough context.
• Be Specific : Cite specific studies, including their methodologies, findings, and relevance to the current research.
• Be Critical : Analyze and evaluate the existing research, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and gaps.
• Be Structured : Organize the literature review logically, grouping studies by themes or findings to create a coherent narrative.
• Be Relevant : Focus on the most relevant studies that directly relate to the research question and objectives.

Unlock your research potential with our dynamic course designed for medical students! Built by an experienced researcher with 150+ publications and 3000+ citations!

Ignoring the research gap in a research paper introduction means failing to identify and articulate what specific aspect of the topic has not been explored or adequately addressed in existing literature. The research gap is a critical component because it justifies the necessity and originality of the study. Without highlighting this gap, the research may appear redundant or lacking in significance.

How huge is this mistake?

• Lack of Justification : The study may not appear necessary or relevant, diminishing its perceived value.
• Redundancy : The research may seem to duplicate existing studies, offering no new insights or contributions to the field. Even if you are using methodology similar to previous studies, it is important to note why you are doing so e.g., few studies have used that specific methodology, and you would like to validate it in your sample population!
• Reader Disinterest : Readers may lose interest if they do not see the unique contribution or purpose of the research.

Example of Ignoring the Research Gap: Many studies have examined the effects of exercise on mental health. This paper looks at the relationship between physical activity and depression.

• Problem : This introduction does not specify what aspect of the relationship between physical activity and depression has not been studied, failing to highlight the unique contribution of the research.

Example of Identifying the Research Gap: Numerous studies have demonstrated the general benefits of physical activity on mental health, particularly its role in alleviating symptoms of depression. However, there is limited research on how different types of exercise (e.g., aerobic vs. anaerobic) specifically impact depression levels among various age groups. This study investigates the differential effects of aerobic and anaerobic exercise on depression in young adults, aiming to fill this gap in the literature.(6)

• Conduct a Thorough Literature Review : Understand the current state of research in your field to identify what has been studied and where gaps exist.
• Be Specific : Clearly articulate what specific aspect has not been covered in existing studies.
• Link to Your Study : Explain how your research will address this gap and contribute to the field.
• Use Evidence : Support your identification of the gap with references to previous studies.
• Emphasize Significance : Highlight why filling this gap is important for advancing knowledge or practical applications.

Do Statistical Analysis on your own with confidence in 2 weeks!

Overly technical language refers to the excessive use of jargon, complex terms, and highly specialized language that may be difficult for readers, especially those not familiar with the field, to understand. While technical language is sometimes necessary in academic writing, overusing it in the introduction can create several problems:

• Reader Alienation : Readers may find the text intimidating or inaccessible, leading to disengagement.
• Lack of Clarity : The main points and significance of the research can become obscured by complex terminology.
• Reduced Impact : The research may fail to communicate its importance effectively if readers struggle to understand the introduction.

Example of Overly Technical Language: The present study examines the metacognitive strategies employed by individuals in the domain of second language acquisition, specifically focusing on the interaction between declarative and procedural memory systems in the process of syntactic parsing.

• Problem : This sentence is loaded with jargon (“metacognitive strategies,” “second language acquisition,” “declarative and procedural memory systems,” “syntactic parsing”), which can be overwhelming and confusing for readers not familiar with these terms.

Example with Simplified Language: This study looks at the thinking strategies people use when learning a second language. It focuses on how different types of memory, such as the knowledge of facts and the skills for doing things, help in understanding sentence structures.(7)

• Know Your Audience : Tailor the language to the intended audience, ensuring it is accessible to both specialists and non-specialists.
• Define Term s: When technical terms are necessary, provide clear definitions or explanations.
• Use Analogies : Simplify complex concepts using analogies or examples that are easy to understand.
• Avoid Jargon : Limit the use of jargon and specialized terms, especially in the introduction.
• Seek Feedback : Ask peers or non-experts to read the introduction and provide feedback on clarity and accessibility.

Curious about delving into research but unsure where to begin?

Poor organization and flow in a research paper introduction refer to a lack of logical structure and coherence that makes the introduction difficult to follow. This can occur when ideas are presented in a haphazard manner, transitions between sections are weak or non-existent, and the overall narrative is disjointed. A well-organized introduction should smoothly guide the reader from the general context to the specific objectives of the study.

Example of Poor Organization and Flow: “Climate change affects agriculture in various ways. Many studies have looked at the impact on crop yields. This paper will discuss the economic implications of these changes. Climate models predict increased variability in weather patterns, which will affect water availability. Researchers have found that higher temperatures reduce the growing season for many crops.”

• Problem : The ideas are presented in a scattered manner without clear connections. The mention of economic implications seems out of place, and there are abrupt shifts between topics.

Example with Good Organization and Flow: Climate change poses significant challenges to agriculture by altering weather patterns, impacting crop yields, and affecting water availability. Numerous studies have shown that increased temperatures can shorten the growing season for many crops, leading to reduced yields. Additionally, climate models predict increased variability in weather patterns, which complicates water management for farmers. These changes not only affect food production but also have substantial economic implications for agricultural communities. This paper will examine the economic impacts of climate-induced changes in agriculture, focusing on crop yield variability and water resource management.(1)

• Create an Outline : Before writing, outline the main points you want to cover in the introduction.
• Think in terms of an inverted triangle : Begin broadly to introduce basic concepts related to your topic. As you progress through the introduction, you can introduce more and more specific topics until you have enough information to justify your thesis statement
• Use Transitional Phrases : Employ transitional phrases and sentences to connect ideas and sections smoothly.
• Follow a Logical Sequence : Present information in a logical order, moving from general context to specific objectives.
• Maintain Focus : Stay focused on the main topic and avoid introducing unrelated ideas.
• Revise for Coherence : Review and revise the introduction to ensure that it flows well and that each part contributes to the overall narrative.

Advisor UNLIMITED Access

We get how stressful the residency match process is, so we're here for you - communicate with your personal advisor ANYTIME you need!

Personal Statement Editing

Our editing includes not only language but also context, structure, and content advising.

ERAS Application Editing

The editing goes beyond language and grammar corrections to structure, design, and content based on your personal story and achievement.

• Interview Preparation

The best way to learn something is to do it. That’s why we divide our interview preparation sessions into two parts. Mock Interview + Feedback

Neglecting the audience refers to failing to consider the background, knowledge level, and interests of the intended readers when writing the introduction of a research paper. This mistake can manifest in several ways, such as using overly technical language for a general audience, providing insufficient background information for readers unfamiliar with the topic, or failing to engage the readers’ interest.

Example of Neglecting the Audience: For experts in genomic sequencing, this study explores the epigenetic modifications resulting from CRISPR-Cas9 interventions, focusing on the methylation patterns and histone modifications observed in gene-edited cells.

• Problem : This introduction assumes a high level of expertise in genomic sequencing and epigenetics, which may alienate readers without this background.

Example with Audience Consideration: CRISPR-Cas9 is a groundbreaking tool in genetic research that allows scientists to edit DNA with precision. However, altering genes can lead to unexpected changes in how genes are expressed, known as epigenetic modifications. This study investigates these changes by looking at specific markers on DNA, such as methylation patterns, and how they affect gene activity in cells that have been edited using CRISPR-Cas9. Our goal is to understand the broader implications of gene editing on cellular functions, which is crucial for advancing medical research and treatments.(8)

• Identify the Audience : Determine who the intended readers are (e.g., experts, students, general public) and tailor the language and content accordingly. Read papers from the journals you are considering for submission. Professional editors curate the language used in these papers and are a great starting point to identify the level of expertise of your audience!
• Simplify Language : Use clear and straightforward language, avoiding jargon and technical terms unless they are necessary and well-explained.
• Provide Background Information : Include sufficient background information to help readers understand the context and significance of the research.
• Engage the Reader : Start with an engaging introduction that highlights the relevance and importance of the research topic.
• Anticipate Questions : Consider what questions or concerns the audience might have and address them in the introduction

USMLE Tutoring

By following these guidelines and avoiding common pitfalls, you can create an introduction that not only grabs the attention of your readers but also sets the stage for a compelling and impactful research paper.

Final Tips:

• Revise and refine your introduction multiple times to ensure clarity and coherence.
• Seek feedback from peers, mentors, or advisors to identify areas for improvement.
• Keep your audience in mind and tailor your language and content to their needs and interests.
• Stay focused on your research objectives and ensure that every part of your introduction contributes to achieving them.
• Be confident in the significance of your research and its potential impact on your field or community.

Let your introduction be more than just words on a page. It’s a doorway to understanding. To help you along, we’ve created a practical course on writing and publishing research projects. It’s 100% risk-free, with a money-back guarantee if you’re not satisfied. Try it out now by clicking here .

Wishing you success on your research journey!

Marina Ramzy Mourid, Hamza Ibad, MBBS

Dr. Ibad graduated from the Aga Khan University Medical College and completed a post-doctoral research fellowship at Johns Hopkins in the Department of Radiology (Musculoskeletal Division). Dr. Ibad’s research and clinical interests include deep-learning applications for automated image interpretation, osteoarthritis, and sarcopenia-related health outcomes.

2025 ERAS Application Updates 

General Surgery Residency Personal Statement Examples 

Emergency Medicine Residency Personal Statement Examples 

Internal Medicine Residency Personal Statement Examples 

About thematchguy, become a researcher in the united states, interested in learning more about literature search with examples from published literature, the comprehensive research course, the systematic review course, the medical statistics course, how to find research positions in the us.

1. Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(28):42539-42559. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6

2. Cai X, Wang D, Laurent R. Impact of climate change on crop yield: a case study of rainfed corn in central illinois. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 2009;48(9):1868-1881. doi:10.1175/2009JAMC1880.1

3. Van Den Eijnden RJJM, Geurts SM, Ter Bogt TFM, Van Der Rijst VG, Koning IM. Social media use and adolescents’ sleep: a longitudinal study on the protective role of parental rules regarding internet use before sleep. IJERPH. 2021;18(3):1346. doi:10.3390/ijerph18031346

4. Schmitt, M. (2021). Effects of social media and technology on adolescents: What the evidence is showing and what we can do about it. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 38(1), 51-59.

5. Gujral S, Aizenstein H, Reynolds CF, Butters MA, Erickson KI. Exercise effects on depression: Possible neural mechanisms. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2017;49:2-10. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.04.012

6. Smith PJ, Merwin RM. The role of exercise in management of mental health disorders: an integrative review. Annu Rev Med. 2021;72(1):45-62. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-060619-022943

7. Sun Q, Zhang LJ. Understanding learners’ metacognitive experiences in learning to write in English as a foreign language: A structural equation modeling approach. Front Psychol. 2022;13:986301. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986301

8. Kolanu ND. Crispr–cas9 gene editing: curing genetic diseases by inherited epigenetic modifications. Glob Med Genet. 2024;11(01):113-122. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1785234

How can we help you?

Leave your message here and we will get in touch with you as soon as possible.

Quick Links

• Our Reviews
• Our Podcast
• Residency Advising
• Personal Statement
• Match®Application Package
• P.O. Box 40388 Pittsburgh, PA 15201
• [email protected]
• + 1 412-295-8358
• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions

WhatsApp Us

Join Over 20,000 Readers

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Paper Introduction – Writing Guide and Examples

Research Paper Introduction – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

Research Paper Introduction

Research paper introduction is the first section of a research paper that provides an overview of the study, its purpose, and the research question (s) or hypothesis (es) being investigated. It typically includes background information about the topic, a review of previous research in the field, and a statement of the research objectives. The introduction is intended to provide the reader with a clear understanding of the research problem, why it is important, and how the study will contribute to existing knowledge in the field. It also sets the tone for the rest of the paper and helps to establish the author’s credibility and expertise on the subject.

How to Write Research Paper Introduction

Writing an introduction for a research paper can be challenging because it sets the tone for the entire paper. Here are some steps to follow to help you write an effective research paper introduction:

• Start with a hook : Begin your introduction with an attention-grabbing statement, a question, or a surprising fact that will make the reader interested in reading further.
• Provide background information: After the hook, provide background information on the topic. This information should give the reader a general idea of what the topic is about and why it is important.
• State the research problem: Clearly state the research problem or question that the paper addresses. This should be done in a concise and straightforward manner.
• State the research objectives: After stating the research problem, clearly state the research objectives. This will give the reader an idea of what the paper aims to achieve.
• Provide a brief overview of the paper: At the end of the introduction, provide a brief overview of the paper. This should include a summary of the main points that will be discussed in the paper.
• Revise and refine: Finally, revise and refine your introduction to ensure that it is clear, concise, and engaging.

Structure of Research Paper Introduction

The following is a typical structure for a research paper introduction:

• Background Information: This section provides an overview of the topic of the research paper, including relevant background information and any previous research that has been done on the topic. It helps to give the reader a sense of the context for the study.
• Problem Statement: This section identifies the specific problem or issue that the research paper is addressing. It should be clear and concise, and it should articulate the gap in knowledge that the study aims to fill.
• Research Question/Hypothesis : This section states the research question or hypothesis that the study aims to answer. It should be specific and focused, and it should clearly connect to the problem statement.
• Significance of the Study: This section explains why the research is important and what the potential implications of the study are. It should highlight the contribution that the research makes to the field.
• Methodology: This section describes the research methods that were used to conduct the study. It should be detailed enough to allow the reader to understand how the study was conducted and to evaluate the validity of the results.
• Organization of the Paper : This section provides a brief overview of the structure of the research paper. It should give the reader a sense of what to expect in each section of the paper.

Research Paper Introduction Examples

Research Paper Introduction Examples could be:

Example 1: In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in various industries, including healthcare. AI algorithms are being developed to assist with medical diagnoses, treatment recommendations, and patient monitoring. However, as the use of AI in healthcare grows, ethical concerns regarding privacy, bias, and accountability have emerged. This paper aims to explore the ethical implications of AI in healthcare and propose recommendations for addressing these concerns.

Example 2: Climate change is one of the most pressing issues facing our planet today. The increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has resulted in rising temperatures, changing weather patterns, and other environmental impacts. In this paper, we will review the scientific evidence on climate change, discuss the potential consequences of inaction, and propose solutions for mitigating its effects.

Example 3: The rise of social media has transformed the way we communicate and interact with each other. While social media platforms offer many benefits, including increased connectivity and access to information, they also present numerous challenges. In this paper, we will examine the impact of social media on mental health, privacy, and democracy, and propose solutions for addressing these issues.

Example 4: The use of renewable energy sources has become increasingly important in the face of climate change and environmental degradation. While renewable energy technologies offer many benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions and energy independence, they also present numerous challenges. In this paper, we will assess the current state of renewable energy technology, discuss the economic and political barriers to its adoption, and propose solutions for promoting the widespread use of renewable energy.

Purpose of Research Paper Introduction

The introduction section of a research paper serves several important purposes, including:

• Providing context: The introduction should give readers a general understanding of the topic, including its background, significance, and relevance to the field.
• Presenting the research question or problem: The introduction should clearly state the research question or problem that the paper aims to address. This helps readers understand the purpose of the study and what the author hopes to accomplish.
• Reviewing the literature: The introduction should summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, highlighting the gaps and limitations in existing research. This shows readers why the study is important and necessary.
• Outlining the scope and objectives of the study: The introduction should describe the scope and objectives of the study, including what aspects of the topic will be covered, what data will be collected, and what methods will be used.
• Previewing the main findings and conclusions : The introduction should provide a brief overview of the main findings and conclusions that the study will present. This helps readers anticipate what they can expect to learn from the paper.

When to Write Research Paper Introduction

The introduction of a research paper is typically written after the research has been conducted and the data has been analyzed. This is because the introduction should provide an overview of the research problem, the purpose of the study, and the research questions or hypotheses that will be investigated.

Once you have a clear understanding of the research problem and the questions that you want to explore, you can begin to write the introduction. It’s important to keep in mind that the introduction should be written in a way that engages the reader and provides a clear rationale for the study. It should also provide context for the research by reviewing relevant literature and explaining how the study fits into the larger field of research.

Advantages of Research Paper Introduction

The introduction of a research paper has several advantages, including:

• Establishing the purpose of the research: The introduction provides an overview of the research problem, question, or hypothesis, and the objectives of the study. This helps to clarify the purpose of the research and provide a roadmap for the reader to follow.
• Providing background information: The introduction also provides background information on the topic, including a review of relevant literature and research. This helps the reader understand the context of the study and how it fits into the broader field of research.
• Demonstrating the significance of the research: The introduction also explains why the research is important and relevant. This helps the reader understand the value of the study and why it is worth reading.
• Setting expectations: The introduction sets the tone for the rest of the paper and prepares the reader for what is to come. This helps the reader understand what to expect and how to approach the paper.
• Grabbing the reader’s attention: A well-written introduction can grab the reader’s attention and make them interested in reading further. This is important because it can help to keep the reader engaged and motivated to read the rest of the paper.
• Creating a strong first impression: The introduction is the first part of the research paper that the reader will see, and it can create a strong first impression. A well-written introduction can make the reader more likely to take the research seriously and view it as credible.
• Establishing the author’s credibility: The introduction can also establish the author’s credibility as a researcher. By providing a clear and thorough overview of the research problem and relevant literature, the author can demonstrate their expertise and knowledge in the field.
• Providing a structure for the paper: The introduction can also provide a structure for the rest of the paper. By outlining the main sections and sub-sections of the paper, the introduction can help the reader navigate the paper and find the information they are looking for.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

How to Publish a Research Paper – Step by Step...

How to Cite Research Paper – All Formats and...

Research Paper Abstract – Writing Guide and...

Research Paper Format – Types, Examples and...

Theoretical Framework – Types, Examples and...

Context of the Study – Writing Guide and Examples

How to write an effective introduction for your research paper

Last updated

20 January 2024

Reviewed by

However, the introduction is a vital element of your research paper . It helps the reader decide whether your paper is worth their time. As such, it's worth taking your time to get it right.

In this article, we'll tell you everything you need to know about writing an effective introduction for your research paper.

• The importance of an introduction in research papers

The primary purpose of an introduction is to provide an overview of your paper. This lets readers gauge whether they want to continue reading or not. The introduction should provide a meaningful roadmap of your research to help them make this decision. It should let readers know whether the information they're interested in is likely to be found in the pages that follow.

Aside from providing readers with information about the content of your paper, the introduction also sets the tone. It shows readers the style of language they can expect, which can further help them to decide how far to read.

When you take into account both of these roles that an introduction plays, it becomes clear that crafting an engaging introduction is the best way to get your paper read more widely. First impressions count, and the introduction provides that impression to readers.

• The optimum length for a research paper introduction

While there's no magic formula to determine exactly how long a research paper introduction should be, there are a few guidelines. Some variables that impact the ideal introduction length include:

Field of study

Complexity of the topic

Specific requirements of the course or publication

A commonly recommended length of a research paper introduction is around 10% of the total paper’s length. So, a ten-page paper has a one-page introduction. If the topic is complex, it may require more background to craft a compelling intro. Humanities papers tend to have longer introductions than those of the hard sciences.

The best way to craft an introduction of the right length is to focus on clarity and conciseness. Tell the reader only what is necessary to set up your research. An introduction edited down with this goal in mind should end up at an acceptable length.

• Evaluating successful research paper introductions

A good way to gauge how to create a great introduction is by looking at examples from across your field. The most influential and well-regarded papers should provide some insights into what makes a good introduction.

Dissecting examples: what works and why

We can make some general assumptions by looking at common elements of a good introduction, regardless of the field of research.

A common structure is to start with a broad context, and then narrow that down to specific research questions or hypotheses. This creates a funnel that establishes the scope and relevance.

The most effective introductions are careful about the assumptions they make regarding reader knowledge. By clearly defining key terms and concepts instead of assuming the reader is familiar with them, these introductions set a more solid foundation for understanding.

To pull in the reader and make that all-important good first impression, excellent research paper introductions will often incorporate a compelling narrative or some striking fact that grabs the reader's attention.

Finally, good introductions provide clear citations from past research to back up the claims they're making. In the case of argumentative papers or essays (those that take a stance on a topic or issue), a strong thesis statement compels the reader to continue reading.

Common pitfalls to avoid in research paper introductions

You can also learn what not to do by looking at other research papers. Many authors have made mistakes you can learn from.

We've talked about the need to be clear and concise. Many introductions fail at this; they're verbose, vague, or otherwise fail to convey the research problem or hypothesis efficiently. This often comes in the form of an overemphasis on background information, which obscures the main research focus.

Ensure your introduction provides the proper emphasis and excitement around your research and its significance. Otherwise, fewer people will want to read more about it.

• Crafting a compelling introduction for a research paper

Let’s take a look at the steps required to craft an introduction that pulls readers in and compels them to learn more about your research.

Step 1: Capturing interest and setting the scene

To capture the reader's interest immediately, begin your introduction with a compelling question, a surprising fact, a provocative quote, or some other mechanism that will hook readers and pull them further into the paper.

As they continue reading, the introduction should contextualize your research within the current field, showing readers its relevance and importance. Clarify any essential terms that will help them better understand what you're saying. This keeps the fundamentals of your research accessible to all readers from all backgrounds.

Step 2: Building a solid foundation with background information

Including background information in your introduction serves two major purposes:

It helps to clarify the topic for the reader

It establishes the depth of your research

The approach you take when conveying this information depends on the type of paper.

For argumentative papers, you'll want to develop engaging background narratives. These should provide context for the argument you'll be presenting.

For empirical papers, highlighting past research is the key. Often, there will be some questions that weren't answered in those past papers. If your paper is focused on those areas, those papers make ideal candidates for you to discuss and critique in your introduction.

Step 3: Pinpointing the research challenge

To capture the attention of the reader, you need to explain what research challenges you'll be discussing.

For argumentative papers, this involves articulating why the argument you'll be making is important. What is its relevance to current discussions or problems? What is the potential impact of people accepting or rejecting your argument?

For empirical papers, explain how your research is addressing a gap in existing knowledge. What new insights or contributions will your research bring to your field?

Step 4: Clarifying your research aims and objectives

We mentioned earlier that the introduction to a research paper can serve as a roadmap for what's within. We've also frequently discussed the need for clarity. This step addresses both of these.

When writing an argumentative paper, craft a thesis statement with impact. Clearly articulate what your position is and the main points you intend to present. This will map out for the reader exactly what they'll get from reading the rest.

For empirical papers, focus on formulating precise research questions and hypotheses. Directly link them to the gaps or issues you've identified in existing research to show the reader the precise direction your research paper will take.

Step 5: Sketching the blueprint of your study

Continue building a roadmap for your readers by designing a structured outline for the paper. Guide the reader through your research journey, explaining what the different sections will contain and their relationship to one another.

This outline should flow seamlessly as you move from section to section. Creating this outline early can also help guide the creation of the paper itself, resulting in a final product that's better organized. In doing so, you'll craft a paper where each section flows intuitively from the next.

Step 6: Integrating your research question

To avoid letting your research question get lost in background information or clarifications, craft your introduction in such a way that the research question resonates throughout. The research question should clearly address a gap in existing knowledge or offer a new perspective on an existing problem.

Tell users your research question explicitly but also remember to frequently come back to it. When providing context or clarification, point out how it relates to the research question. This keeps your focus where it needs to be and prevents the topic of the paper from becoming under-emphasized.

Step 7: Establishing the scope and limitations

So far, we've talked mostly about what's in the paper and how to convey that information to readers. The opposite is also important. Information that's outside the scope of your paper should be made clear to the reader in the introduction so their expectations for what is to follow are set appropriately.

Similarly, be honest and upfront about the limitations of the study. Any constraints in methodology, data, or how far your findings can be generalized should be fully communicated in the introduction.

Step 8: Concluding the introduction with a promise

The final few lines of the introduction are your last chance to convince people to continue reading the rest of the paper. Here is where you should make it very clear what benefit they'll get from doing so. What topics will be covered? What questions will be answered? Make it clear what they will get for continuing.

By providing a quick recap of the key points contained in the introduction in its final lines and properly setting the stage for what follows in the rest of the paper, you refocus the reader's attention on the topic of your research and guide them to read more.

• Research paper introduction best practices

Following the steps above will give you a compelling introduction that hits on all the key points an introduction should have. Some more tips and tricks can make an introduction even more polished.

As you follow the steps above, keep the following tips in mind.

Set the right tone and style

Like every piece of writing, a research paper should be written for the audience. That is to say, it should match the tone and style that your academic discipline and target audience expect. This is typically a formal and academic tone, though the degree of formality varies by field.

Kno w the audience

The perfect introduction balances clarity with conciseness. The amount of clarification required for a given topic depends greatly on the target audience. Knowing who will be reading your paper will guide you in determining how much background information is required.

Adopt the CARS (create a research space) model

The CARS model is a helpful tool for structuring introductions. This structure has three parts. The beginning of the introduction establishes the general research area. Next, relevant literature is reviewed and critiqued. The final section outlines the purpose of your study as it relates to the previous parts.

Master the art of funneling

The CARS method is one example of a well-funneled introduction. These start broadly and then slowly narrow down to your specific research problem. It provides a nice narrative flow that provides the right information at the right time. If you stray from the CARS model, try to retain this same type of funneling.

Incorporate narrative element

People read research papers largely to be informed. But to inform the reader, you have to hold their attention. A narrative style, particularly in the introduction, is a great way to do that. This can be a compelling story, an intriguing question, or a description of a real-world problem.

Write the introduction last

By writing the introduction after the rest of the paper, you'll have a better idea of what your research entails and how the paper is structured. This prevents the common problem of writing something in the introduction and then forgetting to include it in the paper. It also means anything particularly exciting in the paper isn’t neglected in the intro.

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 6 February 2023

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 April 2023

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

How to Write an Introduction for a Research Paper

How to write an introduction for a research paper? Eventually (and with practice) all writers will develop their own strategy for writing the perfect introduction for a research paper. Once you are comfortable with writing, you will probably find your own, but coming up with a good strategy can be tough for beginning writers.

The Purpose of an Introduction

Your opening paragraphs, phrases for introducing thesis statements, research paper introduction examples, using the introduction to map out your research paper.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code.

• First write your thesis.Your thesis should state the main idea in specific terms.
• After you have a working thesis, tackle the body of your paper before you write the rest of the introduction. Each paragraph in the body should explore one specific topic that proves, or summarizes your thesis. Writing is a thinking process. Once you have worked your way through that process by writing the body of the paper, you will have an intimate understanding of how you are supporting your thesis. After you have written the body paragraphs, go back and rewrite your thesis to make it more specific and to connect it to the topics you addressed in the body paragraph.
• Revise your introduction several times, saving each revision. Be sure your introduction previews the topics you are presenting in your paper. One way of doing this is to use keywords from the topic sentences in each paragraph to introduce, or preview, the topics in your introduction.This “preview” will give your reader a context for understanding how you will make your case.
• Experiment by taking different approaches to your thesis with every revision you make. Play with the language in the introduction. Strike a new tone. Go back and compare versions. Then pick the one that works most effectively with the body of your research paper.
• Do not try to pack everything you want to say into your introduction. Just as your introduction should not be too short, it should also not be too long. Your introduction should be about the same length as any other paragraph in your research paper. Let the content—what you have to say—dictate the length.

The first page of your research paper should draw the reader into the text. It is the paper’s most important page and, alas, often the worst written. There are two culprits here and effective ways to cope with both of them.

First, the writer is usually straining too hard to say something terribly BIG and IMPORTANT about the thesis topic. The goal is worthy, but the aim is unrealistically high. The result is often a muddle of vague platitudes rather than a crisp, compelling introduction to the thesis. Want a familiar example? Listen to most graduation speakers. Their goal couldn’t be loftier: to say what education means and to tell an entire football stadium how to live the rest of their lives. The results are usually an avalanche of clichés and sodden prose.

The second culprit is bad timing. The opening and concluding paragraphs are usually written late in the game, after the rest of the thesis is finished and polished. There’s nothing wrong with writing these sections last. It’s usually the right approach since you need to know exactly what you are saying in the substantive middle sections of the thesis before you can introduce them effectively or draw together your findings. But having waited to write the opening and closing sections, you need to review and edit them several times to catch up. Otherwise, you’ll putting the most jagged prose in the most tender spots. Edit and polish your opening paragraphs with extra care. They should draw readers into the paper.

After you’ve done some extra polishing, I suggest a simple test for the introductory section. As an experiment, chop off the first few paragraphs. Let the paper begin on, say, paragraph 2 or even page 2. If you don’t lose much, or actually gain in clarity and pace, then you’ve got a problem.

There are two solutions. One is to start at this new spot, further into the text. After all, that’s where you finally gain traction on your subject. That works best in some cases, and we occasionally suggest it. The alternative, of course, is to write a new opening that doesn’t flop around, saying nothing.

What makes a good opening? Actually, they come in several flavors. One is an intriguing story about your topic. Another is a brief, compelling quote. When you run across them during your reading, set them aside for later use. Don’t be deterred from using them because they “don’t seem academic enough.” They’re fine as long as the rest of the paper doesn’t sound like you did your research in People magazine. The third, and most common, way to begin is by stating your main questions, followed by a brief comment about why they matter.

Whichever opening you choose, it should engage your readers and coax them to continue. Having done that, you should give them a general overview of the project—the main issues you will cover, the material you will use, and your thesis statement (that is, your basic approach to the topic). Finally, at the end of the introductory section, give your readers a brief road map, showing how the paper will unfold. How you do that depends on your topic but here are some general suggestions for phrase choice that may help:

• This analysis will provide …
• This paper analyzes the relationship between …
• This paper presents an analysis of …
• This paper will argue that …
• This topic supports the argument that…
• Research supports the opinion that …
• This paper supports the opinion that …
• An interpretation of the facts indicates …
• The results of this experiment show …
• The results of this research show …

Comparisons/Contrasts

• A comparison will show that …
• By contrasting the results,we see that …
• This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of …

Definitions/Classifications

• This paper will provide a guide for categorizing the following:…
• This paper provides a definition of …
• This paper explores the meaning of …
• This paper will discuss the implications of …
• A discussion of this topic reveals …
• The following discussion will focus on …

Description

• This report describes…
• This report will illustrate…
• This paper provides an illustration of …

Process/Experimentation

• This paper will identify the reasons behind…
• The results of the experiment show …
• The process revealed that …
• This paper theorizes…
• This paper presents the theory that …
• In theory, this indicates that …

Quotes, anecdotes, questions, examples, and broad statements—all of them can used successfully to write an introduction for a research paper. It’s instructive to see them in action, in the hands of skilled academic writers.

Let’s begin with David M. Kennedy’s superb history, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 . Kennedy begins each chapter with a quote, followed by his text. The quote above chapter 1 shows President Hoover speaking in 1928 about America’s golden future. The text below it begins with the stock market collapse of 1929. It is a riveting account of just how wrong Hoover was. The text about the Depression is stronger because it contrasts so starkly with the optimistic quotation.

“We in America today are nearer the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of any land.”—Herbert Hoover, August 11, 1928 Like an earthquake, the stock market crash of October 1929 cracked startlingly across the United States, the herald of a crisis that was to shake the American way of life to its foundations. The events of the ensuing decade opened a fissure across the landscape of American history no less gaping than that opened by the volley on Lexington Common in April 1775 or by the bombardment of Sumter on another April four score and six years later. The ratcheting ticker machines in the autumn of 1929 did not merely record avalanching stock prices. In time they came also to symbolize the end of an era. (David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 . New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 10)

Kennedy has exciting, wrenching material to work with. John Mueller faces the exact opposite problem. In Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War , he is trying to explain why Great Powers have suddenly stopped fighting each other. For centuries they made war on each other with devastating regularity, killing millions in the process. But now, Mueller thinks, they have not just paused; they have stopped permanently. He is literally trying to explain why “nothing is happening now.” That may be an exciting topic intellectually, it may have great practical significance, but “nothing happened” is not a very promising subject for an exciting opening paragraph. Mueller manages to make it exciting and, at the same time, shows why it matters so much. Here’s his opening, aptly entitled “History’s Greatest Nonevent”:

On May 15, 1984, the major countries of the developed world had managed to remain at peace with each other for the longest continuous stretch of time since the days of the Roman Empire. If a significant battle in a war had been fought on that day, the press would have bristled with it. As usual, however, a landmark crossing in the history of peace caused no stir: the most prominent story in the New York Times that day concerned the saga of a manicurist, a machinist, and a cleaning woman who had just won a big Lotto contest. This book seeks to develop an explanation for what is probably the greatest nonevent in human history. (John Mueller, Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War . New York: Basic Books, 1989, p. 3)

In the space of a few sentences, Mueller sets up his puzzle and reveals its profound human significance. At the same time, he shows just how easy it is to miss this milestone in the buzz of daily events. Notice how concretely he does that. He doesn’t just say that the New York Times ignored this record setting peace. He offers telling details about what they covered instead: “a manicurist, a machinist, and a cleaning woman who had just won a big Lotto contest.” Likewise, David Kennedy immediately entangles us in concrete events: the stunning stock market crash of 1929. These are powerful openings that capture readers’ interests, establish puzzles, and launch narratives.

Sociologist James Coleman begins in a completely different way, by posing the basic questions he will study. His ambitious book, Foundations of Social Theory , develops a comprehensive theory of social life, so it is entirely appropriate for him to begin with some major questions. But he could just as easily have begun with a compelling story or anecdote. He includes many of them elsewhere in his book. His choice for the opening, though, is to state his major themes plainly and frame them as a paradox. Sociologists, he says, are interested in aggregate behavior—how people act in groups, organizations, or large numbers—yet they mostly examine individuals:

A central problem in social science is that of accounting for the function of some kind of social system. Yet in most social research, observations are not made on the system as a whole, but on some part of it. In fact, the natural unit of observation is the individual person…  This has led to a widening gap between theory and research… (James S. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990, pp. 1–2)

After expanding on this point, Coleman explains that he will not try to remedy the problem by looking solely at groups or aggregate-level data. That’s a false solution, he says, because aggregates don’t act; individuals do. So the real problem is to show the links between individual actions and aggregate outcomes, between the micro and the macro.

The major problem for explanations of system behavior based on actions and orientations at a level below that of the system [in this case, on individual-level actions] is that of moving from the lower level to the system level. This has been called the micro-to-macro problem, and it is pervasive throughout the social sciences. (Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory , p. 6)

Explaining how to deal with this “micro-to-macro problem” is the central issue of Coleman’s book, and he announces it at the beginning.

Coleman’s theory-driven opening stands at the opposite end of the spectrum from engaging stories or anecdotes, which are designed to lure the reader into the narrative and ease the path to a more analytic treatment later in the text. Take, for example, the opening sentences of Robert L. Herbert’s sweeping study Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society : “When Henry Tuckerman came to Paris in 1867, one of the thousands of Americans attracted there by the huge international exposition, he was bowled over by the extraordinary changes since his previous visit twenty years before.” (Robert L. Herbert, Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988, p. 1.) Herbert fills in the evocative details to set the stage for his analysis of the emerging Impressionist art movement and its connection to Parisian society and leisure in this period.

David Bromwich writes about Wordsworth, a poet so familiar to students of English literature that it is hard to see him afresh, before his great achievements, when he was just a young outsider starting to write. To draw us into Wordsworth’s early work, Bromwich wants us to set aside our entrenched images of the famous mature poet and see him as he was in the 1790s, as a beginning writer on the margins of society. He accomplishes this ambitious task in the opening sentences of Disowned by Memory: Wordsworth’s Poetry of the 1790s :

Wordsworth turned to poetry after the revolution to remind himself that he was still a human being. It was a curious solution, to a difficulty many would not have felt. The whole interest of his predicament is that he did feel it. Yet Wordsworth is now so established an eminence—his name so firmly fixed with readers as a moralist of self-trust emanating from complete self-security—that it may seem perverse to imagine him as a criminal seeking expiation. Still, that is a picture we get from The Borderers and, at a longer distance, from “Tintern Abbey.” (David Bromwich, Disowned by Memory: Wordsworth’s Poetry of the 1790s . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, p. 1)

That’s a wonderful opening! Look at how much Bromwich accomplishes in just a few words. He not only prepares the way for analyzing Wordsworth’s early poetry; he juxtaposes the anguished young man who wrote it to the self-confident, distinguished figure he became—the eminent man we can’t help remembering as we read his early poetry.

Let us highlight a couple of other points in this passage because they illustrate some intelligent writing choices. First, look at the odd comma in this sentence: “It was a curious solution, to a difficulty many would not have felt.” Any standard grammar book would say that comma is wrong and should be omitted. Why did Bromwich insert it? Because he’s a fine writer, thinking of his sentence rhythm and the point he wants to make. The comma does exactly what it should. It makes us pause, breaking the sentence into two parts, each with an interesting point. One is that Wordsworth felt a difficulty others would not have; the other is that he solved it in a distinctive way. It would be easy for readers to glide over this double message, so Bromwich has inserted a speed bump to slow us down. Most of the time, you should follow grammatical rules, like those about commas, but you should bend them when it serves a good purpose. That’s what the writer does here.

The second small point is the phrase “after the revolution” in the first sentence: “Wordsworth turned to poetry after the revolution to remind himself that he was still a human being.” Why doesn’t Bromwich say “after the French Revolution”? Because he has judged his book’s audience. He is writing for specialists who already know which revolution is reverberating through English life in the 1790s. It is the French Revolution, not the earlier loss of the American colonies. If Bromwich were writing for a much broader audience—say, the New York Times Book Review—he would probably insert the extra word to avoid confusion.

The message “Know your audience” applies to all writers. Don’t talk down to them by assuming they can’t get dressed in the morning. Don’t strut around showing off your book learnin’ by tossing in arcane facts and esoteric language for its own sake. Neither will win over readers.

Bromwich, Herbert, and Coleman open their works in different ways, but their choices work well for their different texts. Your task is to decide what kind of opening will work best for yours. Don’t let that happen by default, by grabbing the first idea you happen upon. Consider a couple of different ways of opening your thesis and then choose the one you prefer. Give yourself some options, think them over, then make an informed choice.

Whether you begin with a story, puzzle, or broad statement, the next part of the introduction should pose your main questions and establish your argument. This is your thesis statement—your viewpoint along with the supporting reasons and evidence. It should be articulated plainly so readers understand full well what your paper is about and what it will argue.

After that, give your readers a road map of what’s to come. That’s normally done at the end of the introductory section (or, in a book, at the end of the introductory chapter). Here’s John J. Mearsheimer presenting such a road map in The Tragedy of Great Power Politics . He not only tells us the order of upcoming chapters, he explains why he’s chosen that order and which chapters are most important:

The Plan of the Book The rest of the chapters in this book are concerned mainly with answering the six big questions about power which I identified earlier. Chapter 2, which is probably the most important chapter in the book, lays out my theory of why states compete for power and why they pursue hegemony. In Chapters 3 and 4, I define power and explain how to measure it. I do this in order to lay the groundwork for testing my theory… (John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics . New York: W. W. Norton, 2001, p. 27)

As this excerpt makes clear, Mearsheimer has already laid out his “six big questions” in the introduction. Now he’s showing us the path ahead, the path to answering those questions.

At the end of the introduction, give your readers a road map of what’s to come. Tell them what the upcoming sections will be and why they are arranged in this particular order.

After having written your introduction it’s time to move to the biggest part: body of a research paper.

Back to How To Write A Research Paper .

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

• Langson Library
• Science Library
• Grunigen Medical Library
• Law Library
• Connect From Off-Campus
• Accessibility
• Gateway Study Center

Email this link

Writing a scientific paper.

• Writing a lab report

What is a "good" introduction?

Citing sources in the introduction, "introduction checklist" from: how to write a good scientific paper. chris a. mack. spie. 2018..

• LITERATURE CITED
• Bibliography of guides to scientific writing and presenting
• Peer Review
• Presentations
• Lab Report Writing Guides on the Web

This is where you describe briefly and clearly why you are writing the paper. The introduction supplies sufficient background information for the reader to understand and evaluate the experiment you did. It also supplies a rationale for the study.

• Present the problem and the proposed solution
• Presents nature and scope of the problem investigated
• Reviews the pertinent literature to orient the reader
• States the method of the experiment
• State the principle results of the experiment

It is important to cite sources in the introduction section of your paper as evidence of the claims you are making. There are ways of citing sources in the text so that the reader can find the full reference in the literature cited section at the end of the paper, yet the flow of the reading is not badly interrupted. Below are some example of how this can be done:     "Smith (1983) found that N-fixing plants could be infected by several different species of Rhizobium."     "Walnut trees are known to be allelopathic (Smith 1949,  Bond et al. 1955, Jones and Green 1963)."     "Although the presence of Rhizobium normally increases the growth of legumes (Nguyen 1987), the opposite effect has been observed (Washington 1999)." Note that articles by one or two authors are always cited in the text using their last names. However, if there are more than two authors, the last name of the 1st author is given followed by the abbreviation et al. which is Latin for "and others". 

From:  https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/guides/imrad-reports-introductions

• Indicate the field of the work, why this field is important, and what has already been done (with proper citations).
• Indicate a gap, raise a research question, or challenge prior work in this territory.
• Outline the purpose and announce the present research, clearly indicating what is novel and why it is significant.
• Avoid: repeating the abstract; providing unnecessary background information; exaggerating the importance of the work; claiming novelty without a proper literature search. 
• << Previous: ABSTRACT
• Next: METHODS >>
• Last Updated: Aug 4, 2023 9:33 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uci.edu/scientificwriting

Off-campus? Please use the Software VPN and choose the group UCIFull to access licensed content. For more information, please Click here

Software VPN is not available for guests, so they may not have access to some content when connecting from off-campus.

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

How to Write an Introduction for a Research Paper

Table of Contents

Writing an introduction for a research paper is a critical element of your paper, but it can seem challenging to encapsulate enormous amount of information into a concise form. The introduction of your research paper sets the tone for your research and provides the context for your study. In this article, we will guide you through the process of writing an effective introduction that grabs the reader's attention and captures the essence of your research paper.

Understanding the Purpose of a Research Paper Introduction

The introduction acts as a road map for your research paper, guiding the reader through the main ideas and arguments. The purpose of the introduction is to present your research topic to the readers and provide a rationale for why your study is relevant. It helps the reader locate your research and its relevance in the broader field of related scientific explorations. Additionally, the introduction should inform the reader about the objectives and scope of your study, giving them an overview of what to expect in the paper. By including a comprehensive introduction, you establish your credibility as an author and convince the reader that your research is worth their time and attention.

Key Elements to Include in Your Introduction

When writing your research paper introduction, there are several key elements you should include to ensure it is comprehensive and informative.

• A hook or attention-grabbing statement to capture the reader's interest.  It can be a thought-provoking question, a surprising statistic, or a compelling anecdote that relates to your research topic.
• A brief overview of the research topic and its significance. By highlighting the gap in existing knowledge or the problem your research aims to address, you create a compelling case for the relevance of your study.
• A clear research question or problem statement. This serves as the foundation of your research and guides the reader in understanding the unique focus of your study. It should be concise, specific, and clearly articulated.
• An outline of the paper's structure and main arguments, to help the readers navigate through the paper with ease.

Preparing to Write Your Introduction

Before diving into writing your introduction, it is essential to prepare adequately. This involves 3 important steps:

• Conducting Preliminary Research: Immerse yourself in the existing literature to develop a clear research question and position your study within the academic discourse.
• Identifying Your Thesis Statement: Define a specific, focused, and debatable thesis statement, serving as a roadmap for your paper.
• Considering Broader Context: Reflect on the significance of your research within your field, understanding its potential impact and contribution.

By engaging in these preparatory steps, you can ensure that your introduction is well-informed, focused, and sets the stage for a compelling research paper.

Structuring Your Introduction

Now that you have prepared yourself to tackle the introduction, it's time to structure it effectively. A well-structured introduction will engage the reader from the beginning and provide a logical flow to your research paper.

Starting with a Hook

Begin your introduction with an attention-grabbing hook that captivates the reader's interest. This hook serves as a way to make your introduction more engaging and compelling. For example, if you are writing a research paper on the impact of climate change on biodiversity, you could start your introduction with a statistic about the number of species that have gone extinct due to climate change. This will immediately grab the reader's attention and make them realize the urgency and importance of the topic.

Introducing Your Topic

Provide a brief overview, which should give the reader a general understanding of the subject matter and its significance. Explain the importance of the topic and its relevance to the field. This will help the reader understand why your research is significant and why they should continue reading. Continuing with the example of climate change and biodiversity, you could explain how climate change is one of the greatest threats to global biodiversity, how it affects ecosystems, and the potential consequences for both wildlife and human populations. By providing this context, you are setting the stage for the rest of your research paper and helping the reader understand the importance of your study.

Presenting Your Thesis Statement

The thesis statement should directly address your research question and provide a preview of the main arguments or findings discussed in your paper. Make sure your thesis statement is clear, concise, and well-supported by the evidence you will present in your research paper. By presenting a strong and focused thesis statement, you are providing the reader with the information they could anticipate in your research paper. This will help them understand the purpose and scope of your study and will make them more inclined to continue reading.

Writing Techniques for an Effective Introduction

When crafting an introduction, it is crucial to pay attention to the finer details that can elevate your writing to the next level. By utilizing specific writing techniques, you can captivate your readers and draw them into your research journey.

Using Clear and Concise Language

One of the most important writing techniques to employ in your introduction is the use of clear and concise language. By choosing your words carefully, you can effectively convey your ideas to the reader. It is essential to avoid using jargon or complex terminology that may confuse or alienate your audience. Instead, focus on communicating your research in a straightforward manner to ensure that your introduction is accessible to both experts in your field and those who may be new to the topic. This approach allows you to engage a broader audience and make your research more inclusive.

Establishing the Relevance of Your Research

One way to establish the relevance of your research is by highlighting how it fills a gap in the existing literature. Explain how your study addresses a significant research question that has not been adequately explored. By doing this, you demonstrate that your research is not only unique but also contributes to the broader knowledge in your field. Furthermore, it is important to emphasize the potential impact of your research. Whether it is advancing scientific understanding, informing policy decisions, or improving practical applications, make it clear to the reader how your study can make a difference.

By employing these two writing techniques in your introduction, you can effectively engage your readers. Take your time to craft an introduction that is both informative and captivating, leaving your readers eager to delve deeper into your research.

Revising and Polishing Your Introduction

Once you have written your introduction, it is crucial to revise and polish it to ensure that it effectively sets the stage for your research paper.

Self-Editing Techniques

Review your introduction for clarity, coherence, and logical flow. Ensure each paragraph introduces a new idea or argument with smooth transitions.

Check for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and awkward sentence structures.

Ensure that your introduction aligns with the overall tone and style of your research paper.

Seeking Feedback for Improvement

Consider seeking feedback from peers, colleagues, or your instructor. They can provide valuable insights and suggestions for improving your introduction. Be open to constructive criticism and use it to refine your introduction and make it more compelling for the reader.

Writing an introduction for a research paper requires careful thought and planning. By understanding the purpose of the introduction, preparing adequately, structuring effectively, and employing writing techniques, you can create an engaging and informative introduction for your research. Remember to revise and polish your introduction to ensure that it accurately represents the main ideas and arguments in your research paper. With a well-crafted introduction, you will capture the reader's attention and keep them inclined to your paper.

Suggested Reads

ResearchGPT: A Custom GPT for Researchers and Scientists Best Academic Search Engines [2023] How To Humanize AI Text In Scientific Articles Elevate Your Writing Game With AI Grammar Checker Tools

You might also like

Boosting Citations: A Comparative Analysis of Graphical Abstract vs. Video Abstract

The Impact of Visual Abstracts on Boosting Citations

Introducing SciSpace’s Citation Booster To Increase Research Visibility

Ertugrul Portakal

Apr 12, 2024

Writing a Research Paper Introduction (with 3 Examples)

Nail your research paper's introduction! Learn to captivate and inform readers from the start—our guide shows how!

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A catchy and informative introduction is essential in academic writing, especially if you want your readers to have background information about your paper. However, writing an interesting and informative introduction can sometimes be a time-consuming and tiring process. If you don't know where to start when crafting an introduction, no need to worry - we've got you covered!

In this article, we will explain step by step what an introduction is in academic writing and how to write it!

Ready? Let's start!

• An introduction is a paragraph that provides information about your entire paper and aims to attract and inform the reader.
• Before writing an introduction or even starting your paper, you need to research academic sources.
• The first one or two sentences of an introduction paragraph should be a hook to attract the reader's attention.
• Afterwards, you need to prepare the reader for your argument by giving background information about your topic.
• Finally, you should state your argument about your topic with a thesis statement.
• If you are writing a longer paper, you can inform your readers about the map of your paper.
• If you are looking for an AI assistant to support you throughout your writing process, TextCortex is designed for you with its advanced features.

What is an Introduction in a research paper?

In any academic writing, including essays and research papers, an introduction is the first paragraph that the reader will encounter. This paragraph should both attract the reader's attention and give them the necessary information about the paper. In any academic paper, the introduction paragraph constitutes 10% of the paper's total word count. For example, if you are preparing a 3,000-word paper, your introduction paragraph should consist of approximately 300 words. You should also write sentences within these 300 words that will attract the reader's attention and provide them with information about the paper.

Importance of an Introduction Paragraph

The biggest function of an introduction paragraph is to prepare the reader for the author's thesis statement. A traditional introduction paragraph begins with a few sentences or questions that will catch the reader's attention. After attracting the reader's attention, necessary background information on the subject is given. Finally, the author explains to the readers what the whole paper is about by stating the thesis. A thesis statement is the final sentence that summarizes the main points of your paper and conveys your claim.

First Things First: Preliminary Research

When working on any academic writing type, it is essential to start by researching your topic thoroughly before beginning to type. What sets academic writing apart from other writing types is the requirement for it to be written using accurate information from reliable sources.

Researching academic sources can be a time-consuming and unnecessary process. One has to read through hundreds of pages, review dozens of articles and verify the accuracy of each source. However, if you're looking to reduce your workload and maximize efficiency by automating repetitive tasks such as literature review, ZenoChat is the perfect solution for you. With its web search feature, ZenoChat can use the entire internet as a data source. Additionally, by activating the "scholar" option of the ZenoChat web search feature, you can ensure that it only uses academic sources when generating output.

How to Create an Introduction for Academic Writing?

Creating an introduction paragraph that is interesting, informative, and conveys your thesis is an easier process than it seems. As long as you have sufficient information about your topic and an outline , you can write engaging introductions by following a few simple steps. Let's take a closer look at how to write an introduction for academic writing.

1-) Start with a Catchy Hook

Your first sentence is one of the factors that most influence a reader's decision to read your paper. This sentence determines the tone of your paper and attracts the reader's attention. For this reason, we recommend that you start your introduction paragraph with a strong and catchy hook sentence.

• Avoid long and complex sentences
• Use clear and concise sentences
• Write a sentence that will spark the reader's curiosity
• You can ask questions that will encourage the reader to read the remaining paragraph
• Avoid fact or overly broad sentences
• Avoid using dictionary definitions as your hook

2-) Give Background Information

After writing a strong hook sentence, you need to provide basic information about your topic so that the reader can understand what they will learn about when they read your paper. In this section, you can benefit from opinions that support or oppose your argument. Additionally, this section should refer to the body paragraphs of your writing.

• You can write a background information sentence for each body paragraph.
• The information here should be concise and compact
• Avoid talking about your evidence and results unless necessary.

3-) State Your Thesis 

After attracting the reader's attention and providing background information, it is time to present your approach and argument towards the topic with a thesis statement. A thesis statement usually comprises one or two sentences and communicates the paper's argument to the reader. A well-written thesis statement should express your stance on the topic.

• Avoid merely stating a fact
• Claim your argument

4-) Tell Reader About Your Paper

Although you need to move on to body paragraphs after the thesis statement in short papers, it will be useful to add a few sentences that will guide the reader in your longer papers. This way, your readers can better understand which arguments they will encounter on which pages and the course of your paper. That leads the reader to clearly understand and follow your content.

Let’s Wrap it Up

Writing an interesting and informative introduction is usually a long process that requires a lot of rewriting. You may need to rewrite a sentence dozens of times so that your words and sentences clearly describe your paper and argument. Fortunately, you can generate state-of-the-art introductions using AI tools and use them with a little editing.

When it comes to text generation, paraphrasing, and grammar & spelling checking, TextCortex is the way to go with its advanced LLMs and customization options. With TextCortex, you can generate all writing types, including introduction, from scratch, rewrite your existing texts, change their tone of voice, or fix their grammar. TextCortex is available as a web application and browser extension. The TextCortex browser extension is integrated with 30,000+ websites and apps. So, you can complete your AI-driven writing tasks anywhere and anytime.

Let's examine a few sample introductions generated by TextCortex.

Example Introduction #1

“Should social media platforms be banned from collecting their users' data?”

Example Introduction #2

“Do electric vehicles decrease overall emissions?”

Example Introduction #3

“Is graffiti an act of vandalism or the creation of art?”

Reimagine the way you interact with AI.

Harness knowledge with an AI of your own, define behaviour and integrate your favorite tech stack on over 30,000 platforms.

Did you like this article? Explore a few more related posts.

How to Create a Strong Thesis?

Top 3 AI Tools That Write Essays (Free & Paid)

5 Main Essay Types & Guide with Examples

Questions  answers..

TextCortex is a powerful AI-powered writing tool that can help you reduce your writing time, handle big tasks, and create high-quality content without errors. With its customizable platform, personalized intelligence experience, advanced writing and research capabilities, and error-free content, TextCortex is the perfect tool for creative professionals who want to be a creative force in their industry.

Our AI copilot learned how to write from more than 3 billion sentences and has the ability to create unique content. However, fact-checking is something which still requires a human approval.

TextCortex supports more than 25 languages including English, Dutch, German, Ukranian, Romanian, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian.

Yes, TextCortex is completely free to use with all of its features. When you sign up, you receive 100 free creations. Then you will receive 20 recurring creations every day on the free plan.

Yes, we have a Text Generation API, please talk to us directly to implement it. You can reach out to us at [email protected]

Account sharing is not allowed. If you have a need for more than 5 seats for an account, you can directly contact us at [email protected]

Yes, TextCortex offers 14-day free trial for users to try out all features extensively with higher number of generations. But keep in mind that you can already try everything with the free plan. There is no feature that is locked behind a premium plan.

Overall, TextCortex AI has over 1000 five-star reviews on reputable review sites such as G2, Trustpilot and Capterra.

TextCortex learns and adapts to your unique writing style and knowledge, making it easier for you to write high-quality & personalized content.

Your premium features will be available until the end of your subscription date, then your account plan will be set to Free plan.

General Questions

Your ai copilot is ready to collaborate with you..

Connect your knowledge, customize the style and start collaborating with your AI copilot.

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 4. The Introduction
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

The introduction leads the reader from a general subject area to a particular topic of inquiry. It establishes the scope, context, and significance of the research being conducted by summarizing current understanding and background information about the topic, stating the purpose of the work in the form of the research problem supported by a hypothesis or a set of questions, explaining briefly the methodological approach used to examine the research problem, highlighting the potential outcomes your study can reveal, and outlining the remaining structure and organization of the paper.

Key Elements of the Research Proposal. Prepared under the direction of the Superintendent and by the 2010 Curriculum Design and Writing Team. Baltimore County Public Schools.

Importance of a Good Introduction

Think of the introduction as a mental road map that must answer for the reader these four questions:

• What was I studying?
• Why was this topic important to investigate?
• What did we know about this topic before I did this study?
• How will this study advance new knowledge or new ways of understanding?

According to Reyes, there are three overarching goals of a good introduction: 1) ensure that you summarize prior studies about the topic in a manner that lays a foundation for understanding the research problem; 2) explain how your study specifically addresses gaps in the literature, insufficient consideration of the topic, or other deficiency in the literature; and, 3) note the broader theoretical, empirical, and/or policy contributions and implications of your research.

A well-written introduction is important because, quite simply, you never get a second chance to make a good first impression. The opening paragraphs of your paper will provide your readers with their initial impressions about the logic of your argument, your writing style, the overall quality of your research, and, ultimately, the validity of your findings and conclusions. A vague, disorganized, or error-filled introduction will create a negative impression, whereas, a concise, engaging, and well-written introduction will lead your readers to think highly of your analytical skills, your writing style, and your research approach. All introductions should conclude with a brief paragraph that describes the organization of the rest of the paper.

Hirano, Eliana. “Research Article Introductions in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian, Portuguese, and English.” English for Specific Purposes 28 (October 2009): 240-250; Samraj, B. “Introductions in Research Articles: Variations Across Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes 21 (2002): 1–17; Introductions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; “Writing Introductions.” In Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide. Peter Redman. 4th edition. (London: Sage, 2011), pp. 63-70; Reyes, Victoria. Demystifying the Journal Article. Inside Higher Education.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Structure and Approach

The introduction is the broad beginning of the paper that answers three important questions for the reader:

• What is this?
• Why should I read it?
• What do you want me to think about / consider doing / react to?

Think of the structure of the introduction as an inverted triangle of information that lays a foundation for understanding the research problem. Organize the information so as to present the more general aspects of the topic early in the introduction, then narrow your analysis to more specific topical information that provides context, finally arriving at your research problem and the rationale for studying it [often written as a series of key questions to be addressed or framed as a hypothesis or set of assumptions to be tested] and, whenever possible, a description of the potential outcomes your study can reveal.

These are general phases associated with writing an introduction: 1.  Establish an area to research by:

• Highlighting the importance of the topic, and/or
• Making general statements about the topic, and/or
• Presenting an overview on current research on the subject.

2.  Identify a research niche by:

• Opposing an existing assumption, and/or
• Revealing a gap in existing research, and/or
• Formulating a research question or problem, and/or
• Continuing a disciplinary tradition.

3.  Place your research within the research niche by:

• Stating the intent of your study,
• Outlining the key characteristics of your study,
• Describing important results, and
• Giving a brief overview of the structure of the paper.

NOTE:   It is often useful to review the introduction late in the writing process. This is appropriate because outcomes are unknown until you've completed the study. After you complete writing the body of the paper, go back and review introductory descriptions of the structure of the paper, the method of data gathering, the reporting and analysis of results, and the conclusion. Reviewing and, if necessary, rewriting the introduction ensures that it correctly matches the overall structure of your final paper.

II.  Delimitations of the Study

Delimitations refer to those characteristics that limit the scope and define the conceptual boundaries of your research . This is determined by the conscious exclusionary and inclusionary decisions you make about how to investigate the research problem. In other words, not only should you tell the reader what it is you are studying and why, but you must also acknowledge why you rejected alternative approaches that could have been used to examine the topic.

Obviously, the first limiting step was the choice of research problem itself. However, implicit are other, related problems that could have been chosen but were rejected. These should be noted in the conclusion of your introduction. For example, a delimitating statement could read, "Although many factors can be understood to impact the likelihood young people will vote, this study will focus on socioeconomic factors related to the need to work full-time while in school." The point is not to document every possible delimiting factor, but to highlight why previously researched issues related to the topic were not addressed.

Examples of delimitating choices would be:

• The key aims and objectives of your study,
• The research questions that you address,
• The variables of interest [i.e., the various factors and features of the phenomenon being studied],
• The method(s) of investigation,
• The time period your study covers, and
• Any relevant alternative theoretical frameworks that could have been adopted.

Review each of these decisions. Not only do you clearly establish what you intend to accomplish in your research, but you should also include a declaration of what the study does not intend to cover. In the latter case, your exclusionary decisions should be based upon criteria understood as, "not interesting"; "not directly relevant"; “too problematic because..."; "not feasible," and the like. Make this reasoning explicit!

NOTE:   Delimitations refer to the initial choices made about the broader, overall design of your study and should not be confused with documenting the limitations of your study discovered after the research has been completed.

ANOTHER NOTE: Do not view delimitating statements as admitting to an inherent failing or shortcoming in your research. They are an accepted element of academic writing intended to keep the reader focused on the research problem by explicitly defining the conceptual boundaries and scope of your study. It addresses any critical questions in the reader's mind of, "Why the hell didn't the author examine this?"

III.  The Narrative Flow

Issues to keep in mind that will help the narrative flow in your introduction :

• Your introduction should clearly identify the subject area of interest . A simple strategy to follow is to use key words from your title in the first few sentences of the introduction. This will help focus the introduction on the topic at the appropriate level and ensures that you get to the subject matter quickly without losing focus, or discussing information that is too general.
• Establish context by providing a brief and balanced review of the pertinent published literature that is available on the subject. The key is to summarize for the reader what is known about the specific research problem before you did your analysis. This part of your introduction should not represent a comprehensive literature review--that comes next. It consists of a general review of the important, foundational research literature [with citations] that establishes a foundation for understanding key elements of the research problem. See the drop-down menu under this tab for " Background Information " regarding types of contexts.
• Clearly state the hypothesis that you investigated . When you are first learning to write in this format it is okay, and actually preferable, to use a past statement like, "The purpose of this study was to...." or "We investigated three possible mechanisms to explain the...."
• Why did you choose this kind of research study or design? Provide a clear statement of the rationale for your approach to the problem studied. This will usually follow your statement of purpose in the last paragraph of the introduction.

IV.  Engaging the Reader

A research problem in the social sciences can come across as dry and uninteresting to anyone unfamiliar with the topic . Therefore, one of the goals of your introduction is to make readers want to read your paper. Here are several strategies you can use to grab the reader's attention:

• Open with a compelling story . Almost all research problems in the social sciences, no matter how obscure or esoteric , are really about the lives of people. Telling a story that humanizes an issue can help illuminate the significance of the problem and help the reader empathize with those affected by the condition being studied.
• Include a strong quotation or a vivid, perhaps unexpected, anecdote . During your review of the literature, make note of any quotes or anecdotes that grab your attention because they can used in your introduction to highlight the research problem in a captivating way.
• Pose a provocative or thought-provoking question . Your research problem should be framed by a set of questions to be addressed or hypotheses to be tested. However, a provocative question can be presented in the beginning of your introduction that challenges an existing assumption or compels the reader to consider an alternative viewpoint that helps establish the significance of your study. 
• Describe a puzzling scenario or incongruity . This involves highlighting an interesting quandary concerning the research problem or describing contradictory findings from prior studies about a topic. Posing what is essentially an unresolved intellectual riddle about the problem can engage the reader's interest in the study.
• Cite a stirring example or case study that illustrates why the research problem is important . Draw upon the findings of others to demonstrate the significance of the problem and to describe how your study builds upon or offers alternatives ways of investigating this prior research.

NOTE:   It is important that you choose only one of the suggested strategies for engaging your readers. This avoids giving an impression that your paper is more flash than substance and does not distract from the substance of your study.

Freedman, Leora  and Jerry Plotnick. Introductions and Conclusions. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Introduction. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Introductions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Introductions. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Introductions, Body Paragraphs, and Conclusions for an Argument Paper. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; “Writing Introductions.” In Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide . Peter Redman. 4th edition. (London: Sage, 2011), pp. 63-70; Resources for Writers: Introduction Strategies. Program in Writing and Humanistic Studies. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Sharpling, Gerald. Writing an Introduction. Centre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick; Samraj, B. “Introductions in Research Articles: Variations Across Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes 21 (2002): 1–17; Swales, John and Christine B. Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Skills and Tasks . 2nd edition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004 ; Writing Your Introduction. Department of English Writing Guide. George Mason University.

Writing Tip

Avoid the "Dictionary" Introduction

Giving the dictionary definition of words related to the research problem may appear appropriate because it is important to define specific terminology that readers may be unfamiliar with. However, anyone can look a word up in the dictionary and a general dictionary is not a particularly authoritative source because it doesn't take into account the context of your topic and doesn't offer particularly detailed information. Also, placed in the context of a particular discipline, a term or concept may have a different meaning than what is found in a general dictionary. If you feel that you must seek out an authoritative definition, use a subject specific dictionary or encyclopedia [e.g., if you are a sociology student, search for dictionaries of sociology]. A good database for obtaining definitive definitions of concepts or terms is Credo Reference .

Saba, Robert. The College Research Paper. Florida International University; Introductions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina.

Another Writing Tip

When Do I Begin?

A common question asked at the start of any paper is, "Where should I begin?" An equally important question to ask yourself is, "When do I begin?" Research problems in the social sciences rarely rest in isolation from history. Therefore, it is important to lay a foundation for understanding the historical context underpinning the research problem. However, this information should be brief and succinct and begin at a point in time that illustrates the study's overall importance. For example, a study that investigates coffee cultivation and export in West Africa as a key stimulus for local economic growth needs to describe the beginning of exporting coffee in the region and establishing why economic growth is important. You do not need to give a long historical explanation about coffee exports in Africa. If a research problem requires a substantial exploration of the historical context, do this in the literature review section. In your introduction, make note of this as part of the "roadmap" [see below] that you use to describe the organization of your paper.

Introductions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; “Writing Introductions.” In Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide . Peter Redman. 4th edition. (London: Sage, 2011), pp. 63-70.

Yet Another Writing Tip

Always End with a Roadmap

The final paragraph or sentences of your introduction should forecast your main arguments and conclusions and provide a brief description of the rest of the paper [the "roadmap"] that let's the reader know where you are going and what to expect. A roadmap is important because it helps the reader place the research problem within the context of their own perspectives about the topic. In addition, concluding your introduction with an explicit roadmap tells the reader that you have a clear understanding of the structural purpose of your paper. In this way, the roadmap acts as a type of promise to yourself and to your readers that you will follow a consistent and coherent approach to addressing the topic of inquiry. Refer to it often to help keep your writing focused and organized.

Cassuto, Leonard. “On the Dissertation: How to Write the Introduction.” The Chronicle of Higher Education , May 28, 2018; Radich, Michael. A Student's Guide to Writing in East Asian Studies . (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Writing n. d.), pp. 35-37.

• << Previous: Executive Summary
• Next: The C.A.R.S. Model >>
• Last Updated: Aug 13, 2024 12:57 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

How to Write a Strong Introduction to a Research Paper

by Suzanne Davis | Jun 17, 2021 | Writing Essays and Papers , Writing Process

What makes an introduction powerful?

It’s an important question because an introduction is the first impression readers have of your research paper.  A strong introduction tells your readers not only what you will prove or show— it makes them want to read it .

You want to write an introduction that engages your reader, conveys the importance of your topic, and how and what you plan to demonstrate. These elements are what moves your audience, so they feel a desire to finish your research paper.

A powerful introduction says to the reader, “You must read me!”

3 Key Components of  Strong Introductions

So what are the key parts a good introduction should have? 1) a  compelling hook, 2) important background information and  3) a provable and specific thesis statement.  If you put those 3 pieces together you’ll have an effective introduction.

#1 Compelling Hook

A hook is the first 1 or 2 sentences of your paper.  It is meant to grab your readers’ attention, so they want to see what comes next.  If you want to learn about hooks check out my blog post, “7 Sensational Types of Essay Hooks.” https://www.academicwritingsuccess.com/7-sensational-types-of-essay-hooks/   There you’ll find more details about hooks and how to use them in your essays.

Here are 5 that work well in academic writing.

Powerful Statement /Declaration

With his hook, you begin with a sentence that makes a firm claim. For example, “Every day Facebook invades its users’ privacy.”  This sentence forces readers to reflect on whether or not they agree with this statement.  To do that they need to read your research paper.

In this case, most people have already formed an opinion about Facebook, and here you’ll either challenge or deepen their perspectives.

Fact/ Statistic

This hook is popular because people love to learn facts and statistics.  Studies can be very persuasive.  We regard studies as evidence or proof and place great value on statistics.  When readers see statistics, they want to know more about how it will relate to what you write.  However, make sure the facts you use come from a credible source.

Intriguing Question

When you start your paper or essay with a question, people will want to learn the answer to it.  They are naturally curious, so an intriguing question makes them want to continue reading. Make sure this question connects to what you will write about. An off-topic question is confusing.

Striking Quotation

Quotations are very popular. They can be inspiring and thought-provoking.  You can use quotations from famous people, experts, characters, or even people mentioned in your paper.  For example, if you are writing a case study you could select a quotation from one of the participants in the study. Quotations work well when they connect with the rest of your academic essay or paper. Make sure the relationship between the quotation and your writing is clear.

Simile/Metaphor 

In this hook, you take 2 different things and state how they are similar or the same. For example,  “Facebook is a digital version of prison people want to be in.” This sentence takes 2 different things “Facebook” and “prison” and claims they are alike. The comparison of Facebook being like a digital version of prison is a strong visual.  Your readers will want to see how you show a connection between these 2 things.

Both similes and metaphors accomplish the same thing in your hook. The difference is that a simile uses the words “like” and “as” to make the comparison, “Writing a novel is like running a marathon.”   A metaphor states one thing is another, “Writing a novel is running a marathon.”

#2 Important Background Information

The next group of sentences in your introduction express the circumstance and/or relevant information about your topic.  A lot of times you will see writers describe a problem, an issue or provide historical context.

Include the information people need to know to understand your topic and why it matters.  If you are writing about Facebook and privacy, people would want to see what the situation is and why privacy matters.  A good question to ask here is, “What is the context?” 

Also, start with general information first, and in the following sentences be more specific.  Those specific sentences lead to the most important piece of your introduction: your thesis statement.

#3 Provable and Specific Thesis Statement

A thesis statement is a sentence that describes what you will prove or show in your research paper. Think of it as the point of view (POV) or opinion you have about your topic.  It also guides how you will organize your essay or paper.

A strong thesis statement is clear and specific and one you can prove. For example, Children should not use digital devices until they are at least 3 years old because it lowers their attention span, limits social interaction, and causes sleep problems.

This thesis statement sets up the organization of your paper.  Each of the 3 effects of children using digital devices is part of the body. These sections of the body would go toward proving your thesis statement.

• Body Part A: Digital devices lower a child’s attention span.
• Body Part B:  Digital devices limit a child’s social interaction with others.
• Body Part C : Digital devices cause sleep problems.

So how do you create a thesis statement?

• Examine your topic, and briefly research it. I suggest reading any class notes you have and reading some background sources on your topic. What do people say about your topic?
• Ask yourself, “What do I think about this topic?”
• Brainstorm ideas and review them. What are the ideas that you can find research on?
• Write a sentence that connects your topic to what you will show, reveal, or prove about it . (Do not use the first person “I think” or “I feel” in your thesis statement).
• Evaluate your thesis statement. Is it specific? Can you prove it with evidence?

Write A Strong Introduction

There are different ways you can approach writing an introduction.  You could write the body of your paper first and then write the introduction.  You could write the thesis statement first and then write the hook and background information.

I like to write a thesis statement first, write the body of my paper, and then the conclusion. Afterward, I go back and write the rest of my introduction.

Some people like to begin with a hook and write a strong introduction before anything else.  Write the way that suits you best.  As long as you include a compelling hook, important background information, and a provable and specific thesis statement, you’ll have an impressive introduction.

Want help finding the perfect research paper topic? 

Sign-up below and get the free quick guide, Nail Your Research Paper Topic! 

Tutorpreneur Hero Award

http://becomeanonlinetutor.com/tutorpreneur-hero/

SSL Certificate Seal

Session expired

Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

Privacy Overview

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to write an essay introduction | 4 steps & examples

How to Write an Essay Introduction | 4 Steps & Examples

Published on February 4, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on July 23, 2023.

A good introduction paragraph is an essential part of any academic essay . It sets up your argument and tells the reader what to expect.

The main goals of an introduction are to:

• Catch your reader’s attention.
• Give background on your topic.
• Present your thesis statement —the central point of your essay.

This introduction example is taken from our interactive essay example on the history of Braille.

The invention of Braille was a major turning point in the history of disability. The writing system of raised dots used by visually impaired people was developed by Louis Braille in nineteenth-century France. In a society that did not value disabled people in general, blindness was particularly stigmatized, and lack of access to reading and writing was a significant barrier to social participation. The idea of tactile reading was not entirely new, but existing methods based on sighted systems were difficult to learn and use. As the first writing system designed for blind people’s needs, Braille was a groundbreaking new accessibility tool. It not only provided practical benefits, but also helped change the cultural status of blindness. This essay begins by discussing the situation of blind people in nineteenth-century Europe. It then describes the invention of Braille and the gradual process of its acceptance within blind education. Subsequently, it explores the wide-ranging effects of this invention on blind people’s social and cultural lives.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Step 1: hook your reader, step 2: give background information, step 3: present your thesis statement, step 4: map your essay’s structure, step 5: check and revise, more examples of essay introductions, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about the essay introduction.

Your first sentence sets the tone for the whole essay, so spend some time on writing an effective hook.

Avoid long, dense sentences—start with something clear, concise and catchy that will spark your reader’s curiosity.

The hook should lead the reader into your essay, giving a sense of the topic you’re writing about and why it’s interesting. Avoid overly broad claims or plain statements of fact.

Examples: Writing a good hook

Take a look at these examples of weak hooks and learn how to improve them.

• Braille was an extremely important invention.
• The invention of Braille was a major turning point in the history of disability.

The first sentence is a dry fact; the second sentence is more interesting, making a bold claim about exactly  why the topic is important.

• The internet is defined as “a global computer network providing a variety of information and communication facilities.”
• The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education.

Avoid using a dictionary definition as your hook, especially if it’s an obvious term that everyone knows. The improved example here is still broad, but it gives us a much clearer sense of what the essay will be about.

• Mary Shelley’s  Frankenstein is a famous book from the nineteenth century.
• Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is often read as a crude cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific advancement.

Instead of just stating a fact that the reader already knows, the improved hook here tells us about the mainstream interpretation of the book, implying that this essay will offer a different interpretation.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Next, give your reader the context they need to understand your topic and argument. Depending on the subject of your essay, this might include:

• Historical, geographical, or social context
• An outline of the debate you’re addressing
• A summary of relevant theories or research about the topic
• Definitions of key terms

The information here should be broad but clearly focused and relevant to your argument. Don’t give too much detail—you can mention points that you will return to later, but save your evidence and interpretation for the main body of the essay.

How much space you need for background depends on your topic and the scope of your essay. In our Braille example, we take a few sentences to introduce the topic and sketch the social context that the essay will address:

Now it’s time to narrow your focus and show exactly what you want to say about the topic. This is your thesis statement —a sentence or two that sums up your overall argument.

This is the most important part of your introduction. A  good thesis isn’t just a statement of fact, but a claim that requires evidence and explanation.

The goal is to clearly convey your own position in a debate or your central point about a topic.

Particularly in longer essays, it’s helpful to end the introduction by signposting what will be covered in each part. Keep it concise and give your reader a clear sense of the direction your argument will take.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

As you research and write, your argument might change focus or direction as you learn more.

For this reason, it’s often a good idea to wait until later in the writing process before you write the introduction paragraph—it can even be the very last thing you write.

When you’ve finished writing the essay body and conclusion , you should return to the introduction and check that it matches the content of the essay.

It’s especially important to make sure your thesis statement accurately represents what you do in the essay. If your argument has gone in a different direction than planned, tweak your thesis statement to match what you actually say.

To polish your writing, you can use something like a paraphrasing tool .

You can use the checklist below to make sure your introduction does everything it’s supposed to.

Checklist: Essay introduction

My first sentence is engaging and relevant.

I have introduced the topic with necessary background information.

I have defined any important terms.

My thesis statement clearly presents my main point or argument.

Everything in the introduction is relevant to the main body of the essay.

You have a strong introduction - now make sure the rest of your essay is just as good.

• Argumentative
• Literary analysis

This introduction to an argumentative essay sets up the debate about the internet and education, and then clearly states the position the essay will argue for.

The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education. The use of the internet in academic contexts is on the rise, and its role in learning is hotly debated. For many teachers who did not grow up with this technology, its effects seem alarming and potentially harmful. This concern, while understandable, is misguided. The negatives of internet use are outweighed by its critical benefits for students and educators—as a uniquely comprehensive and accessible information source; a means of exposure to and engagement with different perspectives; and a highly flexible learning environment.

This introduction to a short expository essay leads into the topic (the invention of the printing press) and states the main point the essay will explain (the effect of this invention on European society).

In many ways, the invention of the printing press marked the end of the Middle Ages. The medieval period in Europe is often remembered as a time of intellectual and political stagnation. Prior to the Renaissance, the average person had very limited access to books and was unlikely to be literate. The invention of the printing press in the 15th century allowed for much less restricted circulation of information in Europe, paving the way for the Reformation.

This introduction to a literary analysis essay , about Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein , starts by describing a simplistic popular view of the story, and then states how the author will give a more complex analysis of the text’s literary devices.

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is often read as a crude cautionary tale. Arguably the first science fiction novel, its plot can be read as a warning about the dangers of scientific advancement unrestrained by ethical considerations. In this reading, and in popular culture representations of the character as a “mad scientist”, Victor Frankenstein represents the callous, arrogant ambition of modern science. However, far from providing a stable image of the character, Shelley uses shifting narrative perspectives to gradually transform our impression of Frankenstein, portraying him in an increasingly negative light as the novel goes on. While he initially appears to be a naive but sympathetic idealist, after the creature’s narrative Frankenstein begins to resemble—even in his own telling—the thoughtlessly cruel figure the creature represents him as.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

Your essay introduction should include three main things, in this order:

• An opening hook to catch the reader’s attention.
• Relevant background information that the reader needs to know.
• A thesis statement that presents your main point or argument.

The length of each part depends on the length and complexity of your essay .

The “hook” is the first sentence of your essay introduction . It should lead the reader into your essay, giving a sense of why it’s interesting.

To write a good hook, avoid overly broad statements or long, dense sentences. Try to start with something clear, concise and catchy that will spark your reader’s curiosity.

A thesis statement is a sentence that sums up the central point of your paper or essay . Everything else you write should relate to this key idea.

The thesis statement is essential in any academic essay or research paper for two main reasons:

• It gives your writing direction and focus.
• It gives the reader a concise summary of your main point.

Without a clear thesis statement, an essay can end up rambling and unfocused, leaving your reader unsure of exactly what you want to say.

The structure of an essay is divided into an introduction that presents your topic and thesis statement , a body containing your in-depth analysis and arguments, and a conclusion wrapping up your ideas.

The structure of the body is flexible, but you should always spend some time thinking about how you can organize your essay to best serve your ideas.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, July 23). How to Write an Essay Introduction | 4 Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 14, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/introduction/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a thesis statement | 4 steps & examples, academic paragraph structure | step-by-step guide & examples, how to conclude an essay | interactive example, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• Translators
• Graphic Designers

Please enter the email address you used for your account. Your sign in information will be sent to your email address after it has been verified.

How to Write an Effective Research Paper Introduction

The introduction of a research paper has several purposes. It presents your topic, describes the problem your research seeks to solve, and outlines the structure of your paper. It can also inform your audience about how your study differs from the research that has already been done. Generally, the introduction helps you to show your audience why your research topic is worth exploring. It gives you the chance to convince your reader why they should stick around and see what you have to say.

The first 1-2 sentences of your introduction should give an elevator pitch of your work. Be clear, relevant, and to the point. Don't sweat the engagement of your first sentences. You might have heard the advice that, when writing, you should use the first few sentences to wow your readers, transporting them into a lyrical world of imagination. While this is certainly good counsel in creative writing or consumer literature to hook your reader, research papers are another story; you won't need quotes from wise heroes of the past to grab your readers' attention. In most cases, your audience comprises people already interested in the field who are intrigued by your title and want to delve into what you have found through your study, and you don't want to include trite snippets right at the outset. Of course, you don't want to bore your readers either, so strive for clarity and direct information about your study so the readers who navigate to your paper know what they can expect.

To introduce your research paper effectively, include the following elements in your introduction. You will expand on these topics in greater detail in the paper, but in the introduction to your paper, you'll provide a summary of each one.

• Overview: Provide a focused statement on the subject matter of your research. What questions are you seeking to answer? How will your study make the world a better place? Here you can also briefly describe any problems you encountered while conducting your study (and be sure to state that you will address these problems within the paper!).
• Prior research: It's important that your audience knows you've already explored the field and looked around at what has already been written. Briefly discuss what past studies have concluded on the subject and what that means for your current study. Maybe in your search, you found that your research is the first to address your specific topic, which is why your study is so valuable. Let your readers know that you've done your homework.
• Rationale: Make your case regarding why your study is important today. What will your findings bring to the field? Your research could address current issues and events, or it might illuminate gaps in previous research that need to be filled in order to move ahead in the academic field and strengthen future studies.
• Methodology: In your methodology paragraph, briefly name the processes you applied during your study. Why are these tools the best ones for your specific research? What answers do you get from using these methods? Details on your methodology can bring credibility to your study and help with future application of your findings to similar fields.

• Outline of the paper: At the conclusion on your introduction, offer a review of what your study will discuss specifically in the sections that follow.

Once you've gathered all of the necessary elements for your introduction, try these tips to make your introduction pop:

• Try finalizing your introduction after you've finished writing the body of the paper. While it's beneficial to map out what you want your introduction to say before you begin your paper, wait until you've elaborated on your research in detail, and then create your introduction. With the entire work fresh in your mind, you have a clear grasp on what it's about, your purpose in writing it, and what the study results mean for the world.
• Show, don't tell. When giving a brief summary of your work, give compelling details about why this study is a good one to conduct. Remember, you still want to be brief, but you can accomplish clarity and brevity while also enticing your readers to share your vision. For example, instead of stating, "Dual language educational programs are important for children," consider saying, "Dual language programs help students develop increased cognitive function, future linguistic advantages, and a broadened worldview."
• Keep it simple. Don't bury the good points of your work in excessive detail within the introduction. Your entire paper is where you will delve into the finer points of the research, so take stock of which ideas are the most important and stick to those nuggets to motivate your audience to read on.
• Speak to a broader audience. Your research will certainly attract specialists in the field who know every term you could possibly throw at them, but your audience also includes laymen and people who haven't spent as much time in the field as you have, knee-deep in your study. Remember to make your introduction accessible to those who aren't familiar with the industry jargon. The body of the paper is a great place to flex your muscles and the nitty-gritty details of your research results, but the introduction should be consumable by a much more general group. If you have to use specialized language, make sure to define those obscure terms that only a select few people would know.

Your introduction gives your readers greater access to your work. You are the expert, of course, but your goal is to display your findings to a broader audience, and your introduction is the key to accomplishing that objective. Follow these tips and examples to help you create a strong introductory section for your research paper.

• Tel: +81-3-5541-4400 (Monday–Friday, 09:30–18:00)

10 tips for writing an effective introduction to original research papers

After the title and abstract, the introduction is the next thing your audience will read, so it's vital to begin strongly. The introduction is your opportunity to show readers and reviewers why your research topic is worth reading about and why your paper warrants their attention.

The introduction serves multiple purposes. It presents the background to your study, introduces your topic and aims, and gives an overview of the paper. A good introduction will provide a solid foundation and encourage readers to continue on to the main parts of your paper—the methods, results, and discussion.

In this article, we present 10 tips for writing an effective introduction. These tips apply primarily to full papers and letters reporting original research results. Although some tips will be more suited to papers in certain fields, the points are broadly applicable.

1.　Start broadly and then narrow down

In the first paragraph, briefly describe the broad research area and then narrow down to your particular focus. This will help position your research topic within the broader field, making the work accessible to a broader audience, not just to specialists in your field.

2.　State the aims and importance

Papers rejected for "not showing the importance of the topic" or "lacking clear motivation" usually neglect this point. Say what you want to achieve and why your reader should be interested in finding out whether you achieve it. The basic structure can be as simple as "We aim to do X, which is important because it will lead to Y."

3.　Cite thoroughly but not excessively

Instead of simply saying that the topic is important, show why the topic is important .

Once you've narrowed your focus to the specific topic of your study, you should thoroughly cover the most recent and most relevant literature pertaining to your study. Your review of the literature should be complete, but not overly long— remember, you're not writing a review article . If you find that your introduction is too long or overflowing with citations, one possible solution is to cite review articles, rather than all the individual articles that have already been summarized in the review.

4.　Avoid giving too many citations for one point

Consider the following sentence: "Many studies have found a significant association between X and Y [4-15]." This sentence cites too many studies at once. Although references [4-15] might provide a good overview of the topic, this sentence doesn't provide enough context or explanation for these past studies. If all of these references are worth citing, they should be discussed in greater specificity. For example, "A significant association has been found between X and Y in men [4-7], women [8-11], and children [12-15]."

Get featured articles and other author resources sent to you in English, Japanese, or both languages via our monthly newsletter.

5.　Clearly state either your hypothesis or research question

For research in empirical sciences, stating a hypothesis can be an effective way of framing the research. For example, instead of stating "In this study, we show that X is related to Y by method A," you could say, "In this study, we hypothesize that X is related to Y, and we use method A to test this hypothesis." For research in formal sciences or exploratory research, you could consider stating a research question instead: "In this study, we examine the following research question: Is X related to Y?" Note that the research question doesn't always have to be stated in the interrogative form (with a question mark); instead, you can put the question into a declarative sentence: "In this study, we investigate whether X is related to Y." Hypotheses and research questions are effective because they help give shape to the paper and serve as "signpost phrases" that guide readers through your paper smoothly.

6.　Consider giving an overview of the paper

Example structure of an introduction

Introductory paragraph:

• Give a general introduction to the topic for broad audience
• Narrow the focus to your particular topic
• State your research problem and aims

Literature review (usually several paragraphs):

• Summarize the relevant literature on your topic
• Describe the current state of the art
• Note any gaps in the literature that your study will address

Research targets (usually one paragraph):

• State your hypothesis or research question
• Briefly describe how you will accomplish your aims
• Give a preview of your main results and state the contribution of the work (optional)

Paper overview (optional; one paragraph):

• Give a section-by-section overview of the paper's contents

An organizational overview is more common in some fields than others. It is particularly common in technology, but less so in medicine. In the last paragraph of your introduction, consider giving a section-by-section overview of your paper if it is appropriate for your field. For example, "In Section II, we describe our analysis methods and the datasets we used. In Section III we present the results. In Section IV, we discuss the results and compare our findings with those in the literature. In Section V, we state our conclusions and suggest possible topics for future research."

7.　Keep it short

Try to avoid an overly long introduction. A good target is 500 to 1000 words, although checking the journal's guidelines and past issues will provide the clearest guidance.

8.　Show, don't tell

One goal of the introduction is explaining why your research topic is worthy of study. One of the most common pitfalls is to simply say, "Subject X is important." Instead of simply saying that the topic is important, show why the topic is important . For example, instead of writing "The development of new materials is important for the automotive industry," you could write, "The development of new materials is necessary for the automotive industry to produce stronger, lighter vehicles, which will improve safety and fuel economy ."

9.　Don't bury your readers in detail

In the introduction, if your paper is in a field that commonly summarizes the study's main results before starting the methods, you should avoid stating too many detailed results because these results need the development in the other sections of your paper to be properly understood. Instead of saying "We find that our algorithm requires 55% of the memory and 45% of the computation time of the conventional algorithm," it is usually better to give a general overview of the findings in the introduction: "Here we compare the proposed algorithm with a conventional algorithm in terms of memory use and computational speed, showing that the proposed algorithm is both smaller and faster ." Some older style guides suggest holding back the main result to build suspense, but now journals in many fields— medicine being a notable exception —encourage giving a preview of your main results in the introduction.

10.　Check the journal requirements

Many journals have specific requirements for the introduction in their guidelines for authors. For example, there might be a maximum word count stated or the guidelines might require specific content, such as a hypothesis statement or a summary of your main results.

Concluding remarks

I would like to close with one last piece of advice: When you begin drafting a paper, the introduction should be one of the first things you plan . The introduction serves as the roadmap for your paper; by clearly stating the study's background, aims, and hypothesis/research question, the introduction can guide you as you write the rest of the paper. It's such an important section—setting the scene for everything that follows—that many authors write the methods, results, and discussion sections in full before completing the introduction.

I hope these tips help you to write effective introductions that capture the attention of readers and reviewers. If you're interested in more writing tips, check out our 10 Tips for Writing an Effective Abstract . Also, through our EditingPLUS service , you can get writing tips and advice about your specific manuscript from a specialist editor.

Stay up to date

Our monthly newsletter offers valuable tips on writing and presenting your research most effectively, as well as advice on avoiding or resolving common problems that authors face.

Looking for subject-specialists?

Your research represents you, and your career reflects thousands of hours of your time.

Here at ThinkSCIENCE, our translation and editing represent us, and our reputation reflects thousands of published papers and millions of corrections and improvements.

Microsoft 365 Life Hacks > Writing > How to write an introduction for a research paper

How to write an introduction for a research paper

Beginnings are hard. Beginning a research paper is no exception. Many students—and pros—struggle with how to write an introduction for a research paper.

This short guide will describe the purpose of a research paper introduction and how to create a good one.

What is an introduction for a research paper?

Introductions to research papers do a lot of work.

It may seem obvious, but introductions are always placed at the beginning of a paper. They guide your reader from a general subject area to the narrow topic that your paper covers. They also explain your paper’s:

• Scope: The topic you’ll be covering
• Context: The background of your topic
• Importance: Why your research matters in the context of an industry or the world

Your introduction will cover a lot of ground. However, it will only be half of a page to a few pages long. The length depends on the size of your paper as a whole. In many cases, the introduction will be shorter than all of the other sections of your paper.

Write with Confidence using Editor

Elevate your writing with real-time, intelligent assistance

Why is an introduction vital to a research paper?

The introduction to your research paper isn’t just important. It’s critical.

Your readers don’t know what your research paper is about from the title. That’s where your introduction comes in. A good introduction will:

• Help your reader understand your topic’s background
• Explain why your research paper is worth reading
• Offer a guide for navigating the rest of the piece
• Pique your reader’s interest

Without a clear introduction, your readers will struggle. They may feel confused when they start reading your paper. They might even give up entirely. Your introduction will ground them and prepare them for the in-depth research to come.

What should you include in an introduction for a research paper?

Research paper introductions are always unique. After all, research is original by definition. However, they often contain six essential items. These are:

• An overview of the topic. Start with a general overview of your topic. Narrow the overview until you address your paper’s specific subject. Then, mention questions or concerns you had about the case. Note that you will address them in the publication.
• Prior research. Your introduction is the place to review other conclusions on your topic. Include both older scholars and modern scholars. This background information shows that you are aware of prior research. It also introduces past findings to those who might not have that expertise.
• A rationale for your paper. Explain why your topic needs to be addressed right now. If applicable, connect it to current issues. Additionally, you can show a problem with former theories or reveal a gap in current research. No matter how you do it, a good rationale will interest your readers and demonstrate why they must read the rest of your paper.
• Describe the methodology you used. Recount your processes to make your paper more credible. Lay out your goal and the questions you will address. Reveal how you conducted research and describe how you measured results. Moreover, explain why you made key choices.
• A thesis statement. Your main introduction should end with a thesis statement. This statement summarizes the ideas that will run through your entire research article. It should be straightforward and clear.
• An outline. Introductions often conclude with an outline. Your layout should quickly review what you intend to cover in the following sections. Think of it as a roadmap, guiding your reader to the end of your paper.

These six items are emphasized more or less, depending on your field. For example, a physics research paper might emphasize methodology. An English journal article might highlight the overview.

Three tips for writing your introduction

We don’t just want you to learn how to write an introduction for a research paper. We want you to learn how to make it shine.

There are three things you can do that will make it easier to write a great introduction. You can:

• Write your introduction last. An introduction summarizes all of the things you’ve learned from your research. While it can feel good to get your preface done quickly, you should write the rest of your paper first. Then, you’ll find it easy to create a clear overview.
• Include a strong quotation or story upfront. You want your paper to be full of substance. But that doesn’t mean it should feel boring or flat. Add a relevant quotation or surprising anecdote to the beginning of your introduction. This technique will pique the interest of your reader and leave them wanting more.
• Be concise. Research papers cover complex topics. To help your readers, try to write as clearly as possible. Use concise sentences. Check for confusing grammar or syntax . Read your introduction out loud to catch awkward phrases. Before you finish your paper, be sure to proofread, too. Mistakes can seem unprofessional.

Get started with Microsoft 365

It’s the Office you know, plus the tools to help you work better together, so you can get more done—anytime, anywhere.

Topics in this article

More articles like this one.

How to write a plot twist in your story

When executed carefully, a plot twist has the power to shock and dazzle your reader. Learn how you can incorporate one into your writing.

What's the difference between a memoir and an autobiography?

Explore the differences between memoirs, autobiographies, and biographies.

When to use 'while' vs. 'whilst'

“While” and “whilst” are usually interchangeable, but not always. See how they differ and learn how to use them effectively.

What is touch typing (and why is it important)?

Learn about the benefits of touch typing and how it can help you type faster and more accurately.

Everything you need to achieve more in less time

Get powerful productivity and security apps with Microsoft 365

Explore Other Categories

How to Perfect the Introduction for your Research Article

How-to-perfect-the-introduction-for-your-research-article.

Patrick O'Connor, Author, Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps

February 08, 2022

The introduction – it’s an important part of a research article. It gives you the space to back up the claims in your abstract with evidence. The question is, how do you write an introduction for a research paper that successfully conveys the novelty, significance, and relevance your research has.

Guidelines for selecting, ordering, and presenting your evidence effectively are available from the field of Applied Linguistics (AL) over the past 25 years. Here we’ve created an easy-to-use summary just for authors.

6 ‘stages’ in developing your argument in an introduction

Yes, you are writing an argument. Your aim is to convince your reader that the study you have conducted is new, addresses an important question for the field, and is needed at the present time. AL analysis has identified 6 important argument stages that successful authors use to achieve that goal – note that they are not always used in the order listed here.

1. Present the context or background to your study, claiming its importance to the field and to the interests of the journal’s readers.

2. Lay a foundation of information already known by presenting findings of other researchers on aspects of the problem you addressed.

3. Indicate the need for more investigation by highlighting a gap in the existing work, showing a need for extension of the work, or creating a research ‘niche’ that your study fills.

4. Three alternatives here, depending on your research field and the journal’s conventions: a) state the purpose/objectives of your study; OR outline the main activity of the paper or study (e.g. ‘here we analyze … and investigate …’), OR summarize the findings of the study (used in some fields/journals only).

5. Optionally, highlight a positive value or benefit of carrying out the study.

6. In some research fields only – include a ‘map’ of how the rest of the article is organized. You will know whether you need this stage from reading a selection of recent articles from your target journal. This is a very important strategy for all of us as we prepare a manuscript for submission – analyze well-cited examples from your target journal.

Use the writing process to clarify your argument

Our experience indicates that it cuts down the time needed to reach an effective introduction if you begin by writing your Stage 4 – it will come towards the end in the final draft, of course, but writing it first helps you map out what evidence you need in the other stages. The Stage 4 should emerge from robust analysis and interpretation of your results in the context of previous research. Make sure that your Stage 4 sentences are comprehensive and include all the parameters that make your study novel and significant. Once you and your co-authors are happy with the wording of Stage 4, write a clear Stage 3 – don’t leave it to your readers to guess or make assumptions about the gap you are aiming to fill or the problem you are addressing.

Then you can underline the key terms in your Stages 3 and 4 that need to be introduced and justified in the earlier stages of the introduction. You may need to write more than one paragraph of Stage 1/2 information, especially if there are several ‘strands’ to the rationale for your study – but it will be clear what is needed now. Try several ways of ordering this information, to get the clearest logical flow and target the interests of the journal readers at the beginning.

To help develop your skills for writing introductions, it is useful to analyze successful examples from your own field of research.

For more on using this method to improve your skills in writing an effective research article, see our popular book  ‘Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps, 2nd Edition’ .

You can also find help at Wiley Author Services.  Learn more .

Watch our Webinar to help you get published

Please enter your Email Address

Please enter valid email address

Please Enter your First Name

Please enter your Last Name

Please enter your Questions or Comments.

Please enter the Privacy

Please enter the Terms & Conditions

Your Guide to Publishing

3 article-level metrics to understand your work’s impact

How to write a clinical case report

How to Write A Lay Summary for Your Research

Think. Check. Submit your way to the right journal

10 Ways to Reduce the Word Count of Your Research Paper

Writing for Publication- How Can a Structured Writing Retreat Help?

Infographic: 6 Steps for Writing a Literature Review

How to turn your dissertation into journal articles

How to Choose Effective SEO Keywords for Your Research Article | How to Write a Journal Article

Related articles.

Wiley supports you throughout the manuscript preparation process,

Get a quick understanding of the metrics that matter for your research, what they can show you, and where to find them.

Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Case Reports, Charles Young, discusses what makes a good case report.

Late with a review report? Find out how to handle the situation in this blog post from Andrew Moore, Editor-in-Chief of Bioessays.

Find out more about "Think.Check.Submit", a cross-industry initiative designed to support researchers on the road to publication.

Do you need some guidance on writing concisely? This presentation, originally published on Editage Insights, offers some quick tips to help you keep to your desired word count in academic writing.

Professor Rowena Murray looks back on a recent writing retreat and discusses how such retreats can help overcome writer's block.

This infographic sets out six simple steps&nbsp;to set you on your way to writing a successful and well thought out literature review.

Guidance for PhD students planning to turn dissertations into published journal articles.

Find 5 helpful tips about using keywords in your research article to help journals, and your article, be found more easily by researchers.

Helping authors to bypass article formatting headaches

Improving the author's experience with a simpler submission process and fewer formatting requirements. Release of the pilot program, free format submission.

Get Published: Your How-to Guide

Your how-to guide to get an in-depth understanding of the publishing journey.

FOR INDIVIDUALS

FOR INSTITUTIONS & BUSINESSES

WILEY NETWORK

ABOUT WILEY

Corporate Responsibility

Corporate Governance

Leadership Team

Cookie Preferences

Copyright @ 2000-2024  by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., or related companies. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.

Rights & Permissions

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

How to write a fantastic thesis introduction (+15 examples)

The thesis introduction, usually chapter 1, is one of the most important chapters of a thesis. It sets the scene. It previews key arguments and findings. And it helps the reader to understand the structure of the thesis. In short, a lot is riding on this first chapter. With the following tips, you can write a powerful thesis introduction.

Elements of a fantastic thesis introduction

An introductory chapter plays an integral part in every thesis. The first chapter has to include quite a lot of information to contextualise the research. At the same time, a good thesis introduction is not too long, but clear and to the point.

This list can feel quite overwhelming. However, with some easy tips and tricks, you can accomplish all these goals in your thesis introduction. (And if you struggle with finding the right wording, have a look at academic key phrases for introductions .)

Ways to capture the reader’s attention

Open with a (personal) story.

An established way to capture the reader’s attention in a thesis introduction is by starting with a story. Regardless of how abstract and ‘scientific’ the actual thesis content is, it can be useful to ease the reader into the topic with a short story.

Start by providing data or statistics

So if your thesis topic lends itself to being kick-started with data or statistics, you are in for a quick and easy way to write a memorable thesis introduction.

Begin with a problem

Emphasising the thesis’ relevance

A good thesis is a relevant thesis. No one wants to read about a concept that has already been explored hundreds of times, or that no one cares about.

Define a clear research gap

Every thesis needs a crystal-clear research gap. Spell it out instead of letting your reader figure out why your thesis is relevant.

Describe the scientific relevance of the thesis

Scientific relevance comes in different forms. For instance, you can critically assess a prominent theory explaining a specific phenomenon. Maybe something is missing? Or you can develop a novel framework that combines different frameworks used by other scholars. Or you can draw attention to the context-specific nature of a phenomenon that is discussed in the international literature.

Describe the societal relevance of the thesis

Formulating a compelling argument.

Arguments are sets of reasons supporting an idea, which – in academia – often integrate theoretical and empirical insights. Think of an argument as an umbrella statement, or core claim. It should be no longer than one or two sentences.

Write down the thesis’ core claim in 1-2 sentences

Support your argument with sufficient evidence.

The core claim of your thesis should be accompanied by sufficient evidence. This does not mean that you have to write 10 pages about your results at this point.

Consider possible objections

Think about reasons or opposing positions that people can come up with to disagree with your claim. Then, try to address them head-on.

Providing a captivating preview of findings

Address the empirical research context.

If you did all your research in a lab, this section is obviously irrelevant. However, in that case you should explain the setup of your experiment, etcetera.

Give a taste of the thesis’ empirical analysis

Hint at the practical implications of the research.

You already highlighted the practical relevance of your thesis in the introductory chapter. However, you should also provide a preview of some of the practical implications that you will develop in your thesis based on your findings.

Presenting a crystal clear thesis structure

Provide a reading guide.

The reading guide basically tells the reader what to expect in the chapters to come.

Briefly summarise all chapters to come

Design a figure illustrating the thesis structure.

Especially for longer theses, it tends to be a good idea to design a simple figure that illustrates the structure of your thesis. It helps the reader to better grasp the logic of your thesis.

Master Academia

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox, the most useful academic social networking sites for phd students, 10 reasons not to do a master's degree, related articles, theoretical vs. conceptual frameworks: simple definitions and an overview of key differences, how to write a literature review introduction (+ examples), phd thesis types: monograph and collection of articles, dealing with conflicting feedback from different supervisors.

Starting Your Research Paper: Writing an Introductory Paragraph

• Choosing Your Topic
• Define Keywords
• Planning Your Paper
• Writing an Introductory Paragraph

The Dreaded Introductory Paragraph

Writing the introductory paragraph can be a frustrating and slow process -- but it doesn't have to be.  If you planned your paper out, then most of the introductory paragraph is already written.  Now you just need a beginning and an end.

Here's an introductory paragraph for a paper I wrote.  I started the paper with a factoid, then presented each main point of my paper and then ended with my thesis statement.

  Breakdown:

• << Previous: Planning Your Paper
• Last Updated: Feb 12, 2024 12:16 PM
• URL: https://libguides.astate.edu/papers

Free Introduction to Research Generator

📖 introductions in research.

• ✅ 7 Tips for Introductions
• ⚡ 7 Mistakes to Avoid

🔗 References

Research is crucial in developing new knowledge, solving complex tasks, and gaining headway in various fields. Sometimes, a researcher has the perfect subject to work with and is ready to write about it. However, they realize that they struggle to compose their thoughts and start on their task.

Our research introduction generator is perfect for such occasions.

• Is easy to use,
• Saves time,
• Helps tailor a unique introduction.

The tool might inspire you to take the paper in a new direction. Aside from a user-friendly instrument, we also provide valuable information and advice to make paper writing much easier.

Essay Writing and Introductions

The introduction is the first part of a research paper or an essay in an academic setting . It explains the reason for looking into an issue, its significance, and its goals. With that said, an introduction doesn't cover the study methods or the results of the study. There are separate paper sections to expand on this information in great detail.

A good intro begins with a general statement and narrows it down to the selected research subject. It provides used sources and is usually no longer than four paragraphs. However, the size of the introduction may vary depending on the style guide and research topic . It differs from one field to another, which our introduction in research generator is designed to accommodate.

How to Structure an Intro Paragraph

The introduction gives a concise overview of your research. Important background information makes it easier for the audience to comprehend the significance of your work . Understanding the proper structure of the introduction is vital to get your point across in a straightforward manner.

A well-made intro consists of three elements :

✅ 7 Tips for Successful Research Paper Introductions

This section covers the most effective tips for improving your introduction. Several things play into its success:

• Start with the general and narrow it down . The first paragraph briefly covers the broader research field and moves to a particular subject. This approach makes the paper easier to understand for the wider audience .
• Explain the importance and objectives . One should clearly state their aims with a particular research topic. Otherwise, the readers won't understand why they should care about its outcome.
• Use the right amount of citations . The introduction should be based on the latest related data. Do not overuse quotations , as they distract readers from the paper itself.
• Provide a clear-cut research question or hypothesis . The former works best for papers on formal sciences and exploratory research. You may use the later format for empirical scientific research.
• Provide an overview of the paper when possible . The last part of the introduction may include a rundown of the document's structure. Note that its addition varies from one discipline to another. It's more prevalent in papers on technology and less so in medical research.
• Keep it short . The introduction part should be around 500-1000 words. Check the guidelines or ask your professors to better pinpoint the right length for your intro.
• Don't provide too much detail . Avoid mentioning too many specifics in the introductory part. There will be dedicated sections of the paper disclosing them later on. Better use general statements and exclude lengthy explanations.

⚡ 7 Mistakes to Avoid When Writing an Intro

Introductions are often considered to be the most difficult part of writing an essay – perhaps, even more difficult than conclusions! This is why we've also prepared a list of common mistakes you better avoid when working on them.

When writing an introduction, try to avoid...

Our research introduction generator will help deal with your writer's block and be beneficial in later work! Remember to give our FAQ a look.

❓ Research Introduction Generator - FAQ

Updated: Jul 19th, 2024

• Introduction to Research. – Richard F. Taflinger, Washington State University
• Introduction Sections in Scientific Research Reports. – George Mason University
• How to Write a Good Introduction in 3 Steps (With Example). – Indeed
• The Role of an Introduction. – Pomona College
• 5 Things to Avoid When Writing an Introduction. – Walden University
• Introduction to Research. – Michigan Technological University
• Introductions and Conclusions. – Leora Freedman and Jerry Plotnick, University of Toronto
• Avoid these three mistakes when writing your introduction. – David Otey, Speaking of Solutions
• Organizing Academic Research Papers: The Introduction. – Sacred Heart University Library
• Introductions. – University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• Free Essays
• Writing Tools
• Lit. Guides
• Donate a Paper
• Q&A by Experts
• Referencing Guides
• Free Textbooks
• Tongue Twisters
• Editorial Policy
• Job Openings
• Video Contest
• Writing Scholarship
• Discount Codes
• Brand Guidelines
• IvyPanda Shop
• Online Courses
• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Cookies Policy
• Copyright Principles
• DMCA Request
• Service Notice

Kickstart your research with IvyPanda's free research introduction generator! Just input your topic and key points. Your inspiring introduction sample will be ready in a second. Try it and make a strong first impression with your research!

How to Write a Research Proposal: (with Examples & Templates)

Table of Contents

Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers’ plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed research that you intend to undertake. It provides readers with a snapshot of your project by describing what you will investigate, why it is needed, and how you will conduct the research.  

Your research proposal should aim to explain to the readers why your research is relevant and original, that you understand the context and current scenario in the field, have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, and that the research is feasible given the usual constraints.  

This article will describe in detail the purpose and typical structure of a research proposal , along with examples and templates to help you ace this step in your research journey.  

What is a Research Proposal ?  

A research proposal¹ ,²  can be defined as a formal report that describes your proposed research, its objectives, methodology, implications, and other important details. Research proposals are the framework of your research and are used to obtain approvals or grants to conduct the study from various committees or organizations. Consequently, research proposals should convince readers of your study’s credibility, accuracy, achievability, practicality, and reproducibility.   

With research proposals , researchers usually aim to persuade the readers, funding agencies, educational institutions, and supervisors to approve the proposal. To achieve this, the report should be well structured with the objectives written in clear, understandable language devoid of jargon. A well-organized research proposal conveys to the readers or evaluators that the writer has thought out the research plan meticulously and has the resources to ensure timely completion.  

Purpose of Research Proposals  

A research proposal is a sales pitch and therefore should be detailed enough to convince your readers, who could be supervisors, ethics committees, universities, etc., that what you’re proposing has merit and is feasible . Research proposals can help students discuss their dissertation with their faculty or fulfill course requirements and also help researchers obtain funding. A well-structured proposal instills confidence among readers about your ability to conduct and complete the study as proposed.  

Research proposals can be written for several reasons:³  

• To describe the importance of research in the specific topic  
• Address any potential challenges you may encounter  
• Showcase knowledge in the field and your ability to conduct a study  
• Apply for a role at a research institute  
• Convince a research supervisor or university that your research can satisfy the requirements of a degree program  
• Highlight the importance of your research to organizations that may sponsor your project  
• Identify implications of your project and how it can benefit the audience  

What Goes in a Research Proposal?    

Research proposals should aim to answer the three basic questions—what, why, and how.  

The What question should be answered by describing the specific subject being researched. It should typically include the objectives, the cohort details, and the location or setting.  

The Why question should be answered by describing the existing scenario of the subject, listing unanswered questions, identifying gaps in the existing research, and describing how your study can address these gaps, along with the implications and significance.  

The How question should be answered by describing the proposed research methodology, data analysis tools expected to be used, and other details to describe your proposed methodology.   

Research Proposal Example  

Here is a research proposal sample template (with examples) from the University of Rochester Medical Center. 4 The sections in all research proposals are essentially the same although different terminology and other specific sections may be used depending on the subject.  

Structure of a Research Proposal  

If you want to know how to make a research proposal impactful, include the following components:¹  

1. Introduction  

This section provides a background of the study, including the research topic, what is already known about it and the gaps, and the significance of the proposed research.  

2. Literature review  

This section contains descriptions of all the previous relevant studies pertaining to the research topic. Every study cited should be described in a few sentences, starting with the general studies to the more specific ones. This section builds on the understanding gained by readers in the Introduction section and supports it by citing relevant prior literature, indicating to readers that you have thoroughly researched your subject.  

3. Objectives  

Once the background and gaps in the research topic have been established, authors must now state the aims of the research clearly. Hypotheses should be mentioned here. This section further helps readers understand what your study’s specific goals are.  

4. Research design and methodology  

Here, authors should clearly describe the methods they intend to use to achieve their proposed objectives. Important components of this section include the population and sample size, data collection and analysis methods and duration, statistical analysis software, measures to avoid bias (randomization, blinding), etc.  

5. Ethical considerations  

This refers to the protection of participants’ rights, such as the right to privacy, right to confidentiality, etc. Researchers need to obtain informed consent and institutional review approval by the required authorities and mention this clearly for transparency.  

6. Budget/funding  

Researchers should prepare their budget and include all expected expenditures. An additional allowance for contingencies such as delays should also be factored in.  

7. Appendices  

This section typically includes information that supports the research proposal and may include informed consent forms, questionnaires, participant information, measurement tools, etc.  

8. Citations  

Important Tips for Writing a Research Proposal  

Writing a research proposal begins much before the actual task of writing. Planning the research proposal structure and content is an important stage, which if done efficiently, can help you seamlessly transition into the writing stage. 3,5  

The Planning Stage  

• Manage your time efficiently. Plan to have the draft version ready at least two weeks before your deadline and the final version at least two to three days before the deadline.
• What is the primary objective of your research?  
• Will your research address any existing gap?  
• What is the impact of your proposed research?  
• Do people outside your field find your research applicable in other areas?  
• If your research is unsuccessful, would there still be other useful research outcomes?  

  The Writing Stage  

• Create an outline with main section headings that are typically used.  
• Focus only on writing and getting your points across without worrying about the format of the research proposal , grammar, punctuation, etc. These can be fixed during the subsequent passes. Add details to each section heading you created in the beginning.   
• Ensure your sentences are concise and use plain language. A research proposal usually contains about 2,000 to 4,000 words or four to seven pages.  
• Don’t use too many technical terms and abbreviations assuming that the readers would know them. Define the abbreviations and technical terms.  
• Ensure that the entire content is readable. Avoid using long paragraphs because they affect the continuity in reading. Break them into shorter paragraphs and introduce some white space for readability.  
• Focus on only the major research issues and cite sources accordingly. Don’t include generic information or their sources in the literature review.  
• Proofread your final document to ensure there are no grammatical errors so readers can enjoy a seamless, uninterrupted read.  
• Use academic, scholarly language because it brings formality into a document.  
• Ensure that your title is created using the keywords in the document and is neither too long and specific nor too short and general.  
• Cite all sources appropriately to avoid plagiarism.  
• Make sure that you follow guidelines, if provided. This includes rules as simple as using a specific font or a hyphen or en dash between numerical ranges.  
• Ensure that you’ve answered all questions requested by the evaluating authority.  

Key Takeaways   

Here’s a summary of the main points about research proposals discussed in the previous sections:  

• A research proposal is a document that outlines the details of a proposed study and is created by researchers to submit to evaluators who could be research institutions, universities, faculty, etc.  
• Research proposals are usually about 2,000-4,000 words long, but this depends on the evaluating authority’s guidelines.  
• A good research proposal ensures that you’ve done your background research and assessed the feasibility of the research.  
• Research proposals have the following main sections—introduction, literature review, objectives, methodology, ethical considerations, and budget.  

Frequently Asked Questions  

Q1. How is a research proposal evaluated?  

A1. In general, most evaluators, including universities, broadly use the following criteria to evaluate research proposals . 6  

• Significance —Does the research address any important subject or issue, which may or may not be specific to the evaluator or university?  
• Content and design —Is the proposed methodology appropriate to answer the research question? Are the objectives clear and well aligned with the proposed methodology?  
• Sample size and selection —Is the target population or cohort size clearly mentioned? Is the sampling process used to select participants randomized, appropriate, and free of bias?  
• Timing —Are the proposed data collection dates mentioned clearly? Is the project feasible given the specified resources and timeline?  
• Data management and dissemination —Who will have access to the data? What is the plan for data analysis?  

Q2. What is the difference between the Introduction and Literature Review sections in a research proposal ?  

A2. The Introduction or Background section in a research proposal sets the context of the study by describing the current scenario of the subject and identifying the gaps and need for the research. A Literature Review, on the other hand, provides references to all prior relevant literature to help corroborate the gaps identified and the research need.  

Q3. How long should a research proposal be?  

A3. Research proposal lengths vary with the evaluating authority like universities or committees and also the subject. Here’s a table that lists the typical research proposal lengths for a few universities.  

Q4. What are the common mistakes to avoid in a research proposal ?  

A4. Here are a few common mistakes that you must avoid while writing a research proposal . 7  

• No clear objectives: Objectives should be clear, specific, and measurable for the easy understanding among readers.  
• Incomplete or unconvincing background research: Background research usually includes a review of the current scenario of the particular industry and also a review of the previous literature on the subject. This helps readers understand your reasons for undertaking this research because you identified gaps in the existing research.  
• Overlooking project feasibility: The project scope and estimates should be realistic considering the resources and time available.   
• Neglecting the impact and significance of the study: In a research proposal , readers and evaluators look for the implications or significance of your research and how it contributes to the existing research. This information should always be included.  
• Unstructured format of a research proposal : A well-structured document gives confidence to evaluators that you have read the guidelines carefully and are well organized in your approach, consequently affirming that you will be able to undertake the research as mentioned in your proposal.  
• Ineffective writing style: The language used should be formal and grammatically correct. If required, editors could be consulted, including AI-based tools such as Paperpal , to refine the research proposal structure and language.  

Thus, a research proposal is an essential document that can help you promote your research and secure funds and grants for conducting your research. Consequently, it should be well written in clear language and include all essential details to convince the evaluators of your ability to conduct the research as proposed.  

This article has described all the important components of a research proposal and has also provided tips to improve your writing style. We hope all these tips will help you write a well-structured research proposal to ensure receipt of grants or any other purpose.  

References  

• Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Nethra SS. How to write a research proposal? Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):631-634. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037942/  
• Writing research proposals. Harvard College Office of Undergraduate Research and Fellowships. Harvard University. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://uraf.harvard.edu/apply-opportunities/app-components/essays/research-proposals  
• What is a research proposal? Plus how to write one. Indeed website. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/research-proposal  
• Research proposal template. University of Rochester Medical Center. Accessed July 16, 2024. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/pediatrics/research/documents/Research-proposal-Template.pdf  
• Tips for successful proposal writing. Johns Hopkins University. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://research.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tips-for-Successful-Proposal-Writing.pdf  
• Formal review of research proposals. Cornell University. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://irp.dpb.cornell.edu/surveys/survey-assessment-review-group/research-proposals  
• 7 Mistakes you must avoid in your research proposal. Aveksana (via LinkedIn). Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-mistakes-you-must-avoid-your-research-proposal-aveksana-cmtwf/  

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

How to write a phd research proposal.

• What are the Benefits of Generative AI for Academic Writing?
• How to Avoid Plagiarism When Using Generative AI Tools
• What is Hedging in Academic Writing?  

How to Write Your Research Paper in APA Format

The future of academia: how ai tools are changing the way we do research, you may also like, dissertation printing and binding | types & comparison , what is a dissertation preface definition and examples , how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements.

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• Image & Use Policy
• Translations

UC MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY

Understanding Evolution

Your one-stop source for information on evolution

• ES en Español

Evolution 101

What is evolution and how does it work? Evolution 101 provides the nuts-and-bolts on the patterns and mechanisms of evolution. You can explore the following sections:

• An introduction to evolution Evolution briefly defined and explained
• The history of life: looking at the patterns How does evolution lead to the tree of life?
• Mechanisms: the processes of evolution How does evolution work?
• Microevolution How does evolution work on a small scale?
• Speciation What are species anyway, and how do new ones evolve?
• Macroevolution How does evolution work on a grand scale?
• The big issues What are some of the big questions that evolutionary biologists are trying to answer?

An introduction to evolution

Subscribe to our newsletter

• Teaching resource database
• Correcting misconceptions
• Conceptual framework and NGSS alignment
• Image and use policy
• Evo in the News
• The Tree Room
• Browse learning resources

Mineral Reconnaissance Through Scientific Consensus: First National Prospectivity Maps for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr and Witwatersrand-type Au Deposits in South Africa

• Original Paper
• Open access
• Published: 14 August 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Glen T. Nwaila   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-9890 1 ,
• Steven E. Zhang 2 ,
• Julie E. Bourdeau 2 ,
• Emmanuel John M. Carranza 3 ,
• Stephanie Enslin 1 ,
• Musa S. D. Manzi 1 ,
• Fenitra Andriampenomanana 1 &
• Yousef Ghorbani 4  

278 Accesses

Explore all metrics

We present here the first experimental science (consensus)-based mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) method and its validation results in the form of national prospectivity maps and datasets for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr and Witwatersrand-type Au deposits in South Africa. The research objectives were: (1) to develop the method toward applicative uses; (2) to the extent possible, validate the effectiveness of the method; and (3) to provide national MPM products. The MPM method was validated by targeting mega-deposits within the world’s largest and best exploited geological systems and mining districts—the Bushveld Complex and the Witwatersrand Basin. Their incomparable knowledge and mega-deposit status make them the most useful for validating MPM methods, serving as “certified reference targets”. Our MPM method is built using scientific consensus via deep ensemble construction, using workflow experimentation that propagates uncertainty of subjective workflow choices by mimicking the outcome of an ensemble of data scientists. The consensus models are a data-driven equivalent to expert aggregation, increasing confidence in our MPM products. By capturing workflow-induced uncertainty, the study produced MPM products that not only highlight potential exploration targets but also offer a spatial consensus level for each, de-risking downstream exploration. Our MPM results agree qualitatively with exploration and geological knowledge. In particular, our method identified areas of high prospectivity in known exploration regions and geologically and geospatially corresponding to the known extents of both mineral systems. The convergence rate of the ensemble demonstrated a high level of statistical durability of our MPM products, suggesting that they can guide exploration at a national scale until significant new data emerge. Potential new exploration targets for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr are located northwest of the Bushveld Complex; for Au, promising areas are west of the Witwatersrand Basin. The broader implications of this work for the mineral industry are profound. As exploration becomes more data-driven, the question of trust in MPM products must be addressed; it can be done using the proposed scientific method.

Graphical Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Uncertainties in GIS-Based Mineral Prospectivity Mapping: Key Types, Potential Impacts and Possible Solutions

Modulating the Impacts of Stochastic Uncertainties Linked to Deposit Locations in Data-Driven Predictive Mapping of Mineral Prospectivity

Workflow-Induced Uncertainty in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) is a form of mineral reconnaissance (Mihalasky, 1998 ; Paganelli et al., 2002 ). It has the potential to lower exploration cost and expedite mineral discovery (Carranza & Hale 2000 , 2002 ; Carranza et al., 2005 , 2008 ; Carranza & Laborte, 2015 ; Yousefi et al., 2021 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ), through the integrated analysis of multidisciplinary geodata (Agterberg, 1989 ; Agterberg et al., 1993 ; Harris, 2001 ; Agterberg & Cheng, 2002 ; Porwal & Hale, 2003 ; Partington, 2010 ; Zhang et al., 2014 ). Geodata used in MPM can include geographical, geophysical, geological, and geochemical types (Dentith et al., 1994 ; Sabins, 1999 ; Milsom, 2006 ; Carranza, 2008 , 2017 ; Sundararajan, 2012 ; Rajan Girija & Mayappan, 2019 ; Okada, 2021 ). Recently, MPM has shifted from largely relying on geographic information systems (GIS) to generalized data modeling methods (Zuo et al., 2023 ). In particular, the integration of data science methods, particularly machine learning (ML), into MPM marks a fundamental shift toward more data-driven methodologies, creating a philosophical counterpart to knowledge-based approaches (Li et al., 2023 ). This is because information contained in geodata has drastically increased in the variable domain (aspatial data attributes or variables), as geodata have become higher dimensional and bigger (Zuo et al., 2023 ). Therefore, ML suits MPM because it is intended for generalized data analysis and mining, and automation (Hastie et al., 2009 ; Hazzan & Mike, 2023 ).

In mining-mature and economically developed countries such as Australia, Canada and the USA, the advent of ML-aided MPM at the national scale is recent, with the first products published within the last decade (Harris et al., 2015 ; Lawley et al., 2021 , 2022 ; Parsa et al., 2024 ). Data-driven MPM is technically demanding because it necessitates both breadth and depth of knowledge across the geosciences, geodata science and GIS (Yousefi et al., 2019 ; Gonzalez-Alvarez et al., 2020 ). There are outstanding problems in data-driven MPM, some of which are major and impact the trustworthiness of MPM products (Zhang et al., 2024b ): (1) intra-practitioner differences creating equiprobable “best” models, promoted by an incomplete geodata science framework; (2) despite the use of big data analysis methods, there is a lack of “just-in-time” validation methods; and (3) an absence of negative-outcome publications (e.g., mismatched predictions and outcomes). South Africa’s unique mega-deposits and longevity of mineral extraction and research (Frost-Killian et al., 2016 ) favor MPM method development and validation. The mining sector’s contribution to the country’s economy is in decline, affecting the nation’s economy and prospects. Part of the issue stems from an exhaustion of existing deposits, which actually is an unprecedented opportunity for MPM method development and validation because the spatial extent of mineralization is best known after significant extraction has occurred. Consequently, systems that are both spatially extensive and becoming exhausted, especially of a mega-deposit type, have the potential to become “certified reference targets” of MPM methods.

Resource exhaustion also means that South Africa needs rejuvenated exploration efforts, but it has yet to develop national MPM products to attract investment. This can be attributed to the considerable skills and knowledge gap in key disciplines. A concerted national and international effort is needed to cultivate expertise in transdisciplinary disciplines (e.g., data science, which is applicative in other fields), exchange best practices and solve outstanding problems. South African MPM products could help to focus future exploration efforts and contribute to sustainable and environmentally conscious mining practices (Joly et al., 2015 ). A modern pathway could be for South Africa to leverage MPM to capitalize on the global demand for critical raw minerals (Castillo et al., 2023 ) because it is well endowed in platinum group elements (PGEs), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), gold (Au), and chromium (Cr), among others (Frost-Killian et al., 2016 ).

Among South Africa's most prized mining and geological terranes are the Bushveld Complex (BC) and the Witwatersrand Basin (WB) (Frost-Killian et al., 2016 ). The BC is known for its abundant resources of PGEs (the world’s largest reserves; Schulte, 2024 ), Ni, Cu and Cr, aside from its status as the host of the world’s largest ultramafic–mafic layered intrusion (e.g., Eales & Cawthorn, 1996 ; Cawthorn, 2010 ), while the WB has been a significant source of Au for over a century (e.g., Frimmel, 2014 ; Frimmel & Nwaila, 2020 ). These terranes are well explored but are still under active exploration, which makes MPM in these terranes a meaningful challenge. The available knowledge of the BC and WB also permits geoscientists to substantiate the realism of MPM outcomes at a large scale, which is critical in the adoption of MPM methodology and products. A lack of validation, especially for new methods, leads to investor apathy. The value of MPM products is ultimately determined by its adoption in the mining industry. The BC and WB were thus selected as “certified reference targets” for four reasons:

Geological validation potential: The BC is the world's largest layered ultramafic–mafic intrusions and is rich in PGEs and other metals, making it a prime example of such deposits. Similarly, the WB is known for its vast auriferous deposits. The geology and metallogenesis of these deposits are exceptionally well studied, with known documentations of the spatial extent of both systems and their internal structures.

Economic validation potential: The mineral deposits for which the BC and WB are known have considerable economic value due to their rich metal content. Understanding and improving the accuracy of MPM in these areas is important to the South African economy. Validation of MPM products should extend beyond geology and include economic feasibility. Therefore, known exploration efforts in predicted positive prospectivity regions are important to build economic trust in MPM products.

There is sufficient data for data-driven MPM for the mineral deposits of interest in the BC and WB due to their long history of exploration, study and mining.

Diversity of deposits: This diversity allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the consensus approach in different geological contexts.

Therefore, we aimed to develop, implement and validate an experimental science-based MPM method, which explicitly propagates workflow-induced uncertainty in typical geodata science-based MPM. We attempted to validate the MPM outcomes using knowledge and well-studied mega-deposits, and therefore demonstrate the effectiveness of scientific consensus as applied to MPM workflows. We provided the first national-scale maps of prospectivity for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr and Witwatersrand-type Au, with explicit depictions of the level of consensus.

Mineral Prospectivity Mapping and Associated Uncertainties

MPM practitioners generally follow established frameworks (e.g., Alozie, 2019 ; Yousefi et al., 2021 ) that range from knowledge—to data-driven (Bonham-Carter, 1994 ; Skabar, 2005 ; Senanayake et al., 2023 ). Knowledge-driven methods leverage geological knowledge to map target areas (Harris et al., 2015 ) and can suffer from incomplete knowledge, heuristic methodology and subjective or biased application, potentially overlooking atypical mineralization patterns (Ford et al., 2019 ). Data-driven methods can be more objective, but suffer from data quality issues (Burkin et al., 2019 ) and methodology problems, such as framework limitations (Zhang et al., 2024b ). Data typically required in MPM include evidence layers that capture proxies of mineralization and deposit labels. However, spatial relationships between mineralization proxies and deposits may not be local (Zuo, 2016 ).

The procedures for data-driven MPM adhere to the geodata science framework (Zuo, 2020 ) and are mainly formulated as ML tasks (e.g., Wang et al., 2020 ). The geodata science framework consists of two major components (Zuo, 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2024b ): (1) a data science framework; and (2) a geospatial extension. Data science techniques excel at handling non-spatial relationships in data (Hazzan & Mike, 2023 ), and are therefore intended for modeling data primarily in the variable domain (e.g., without using spatial coordinates). Data science workflows commonly contain a cyclical set of components: (1) data collection; (2) data preparation; (3) exploratory data analysis; (4) data modeling; and (5) deployment and reporting. The geospatial component handles spatial analyses of data models, such as spatial visualization (e.g., mapping) and performance assessment of models in the spatial domain (measurement of spatial characteristics, such as areal reductions).

Construction of geodata science workflows depends on the objective of the task. For MPM tasks, the objective is to minimize the search area for mineral resources (the spatial objective) while attaining the highest model performance (the variable domain objective). The data science portion of the workflow is steered by ML task formulation. For example, supervised methods require data labels and a supervised workflow design. For binary class labels, which is the equivalent to grid cells being labeled “prospective” or “not” (positive or negative, respectively), the most natural ML task is binary classification. The objective of the ML task is therefore abstracted to become: given training data, predict grid cells as positive (prospective) or negative (Zhou & Liu, 2006 ; Seiffert et al., 2010 ). This task formulation is necessary but insufficient. The spatial objective of MPM imparts additional model constraints. Therefore, the geodata science task is more complex than merely a ML task. To ensure an optimal and unique solution, both objectives must be maximized jointly.

There are three known classes of uncertainties in data-driven MPM (Zhang et al., 2024b ): (1) data-related (aleatoric); (2) model-related (epistemic); and (3) workflow-induced. Aleatoric uncertainty is the result of non-perfect quality, resolution and completeness of data (An et al., 1991 , 1994 ; Brown et al., 2000 ; Cai & Zhu, 2015 ; Burkin et al., 2019 ; Parsa & Carranza, 2021 ), which affect the realism of MPM products. Epistemic uncertainty is introduced by model limitations (Hüllermeier & Waegeman, 2021 ). Consistent with the intention of the data science framework, workflow components are plug-and-play, whose selection is subject to metric-driven experimentation. Therefore, algorithms can be simple (e.g., logistic regression) or complex (e.g., ensemble-based algorithms or neural networks) (Ma et al., 2020 ; Sun et al., 2020 ; Daviran et al., 2022 ; Yin & Li, 2022 ). Workflow-induced uncertainty is a newer discovery, which captures the effects of a decoupling of the spatial objective from the data science framework. It results in an inability to build a model deterministically, whose area of predicted sites meets a spatial objective.

Workflow-induced uncertainty is a result of two geodata science conditions (Zhang et al., 2024b ): (1) unlimited component choices in the data science workflow (e.g., ML algorithm); and (2) a unidirectional geospatial extension of the data science framework, which prevents a joint optimization of model performance in both domains. Data science workflows are technically experiments, whose design is steered by model performance. A better workflow is assumed to result in a better model. This assumption is upheld for typical data science products because models typically have only variable domain objectives (e.g., performance benchmarks). However, for MPM because modeling uses mainly aspatial covariates (data in the variable domain), and spatial evaluations are made after model construction due to the unidirectional geospatial extension, optimization is aspatial. It was observed that spatial characteristics are only weakly dependent on model performance statistically (Zhang et al., 2024b ). In particular, the biggest source of workflow-induced uncertainty is the selection of ML algorithm, followed by feature space dimensionality and the hyperparameter tuning metric (Zhang et al., 2024b ). Solely building models using the data science framework results in spatially equiprobable models, which create a type of uncertainty that is unquantifiable in singleton workflows.

Due to workflow-induced uncertainty, inter-practitioner differences in data-driven MPM can create substantial targeting differences, especially in greenfield areas. From the perspective of the mining industry, a key question is: how reliable are individual MPM products? A scientific answer requires an adherence to experimental science practices, particularly the ascribing of value of experimental findings using scientific consensus (Zhang et al., 2024b ). A scientific solution to workflow-induced uncertainty was proposed by explicitly propagating inter-practitioner differences as a form of uncertainty to the final MPM product. This solution also avoids manually scrutinizing models based on their perceived spatial characteristics, which is subjective and implicitly knowledge-driven.

Methodology, Data Engineering and Geodata Science

Workflow design—background of the consensus-based mpm workflow.

This study advances the workflow introduced by Zhang et al. ( 2024b ), which was designed to propagate workflow-induced uncertainty. Development focused on engineering the workflow from pure research to applicative purposes by: (1) propagating uncertainty of negative label selection, which is a known type of uncertainty in data engineering (Zuo et al., 2021 ); (2) creating a model merging metric; and (3) creating a model acceptance criterion that is generally useful. For the purpose of uncertainty propagation, workflow modulation controls the extent of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties. Our workflow contained two portions: (1) a data science workflow; and (2) a post-hoc geodata science extension. The data science workflow handles feature extraction and dimensionality reduction, predictive modeling and variable domain performance assessment. The geodata science extension handles the spatial evaluation of models. Uncertainty propagation occurs by: (1) creating a deep ensemble using de-correlated workflows, with de-correlation occurring by modulating workflow component choices; (2) merging models using a metric, by treating each optimized model as an experimental outcome; and (3) mapping the consensus and dissent of the ensemble. Decomposing prospectivity into ensemble dissent and consensus adheres to best practices in metrology, which improves the usability of MPM products. This is because as per definition of scientific dissent, targeting areas of high dissent in the ensemble is risky but can give rise to new discoveries (Solomon, 1994 ). Similarly, high consensus areas are less risky but are also less rewarding because they are more likely to be brownfield (Laudan, 1984 ).

Data Engineering—Spatial Indexing and Grid Construction

The complete data compilation is presented in Supplementary Material 1, including the prediction results from this study. Datasets were sourced from various published material (mostly from the Council for Geosciences [CGS]). The two types of data in the variable domain were: (1) evidence layers or ML covariates; and (2) data labels of the presence of mineral deposits. Covariates are intended to capture proxies of mineral presence, such as rock alteration zones, cratonic and mobile belt signatures, geochemical anomalies, and distinctive geophysical signatures (Agterberg, 1992 ). Compared to other countries, such as Australia, USA and Canada (Lawley et al., 2021 , 2022 ), South Africa’s national geodata availability and coverage are less complete and some data types are unavailable (e.g., national geochemical surveys are insufficient in coverage for large-scale MPM). There are other unique issues associated with the South African data as well, including the usefulness of geophysical proxies to the lithosphere-to-asthenosphere boundary (discussed below). Consequently, covariates available for this study were sourced to be as complete and general as possible to facilitate data reuse. In total, there were 38 covariates in the compilation.

Covariates were integrated using QGIS (version 3.34.3). The first step was data management and engineering, which entailed importing and standardizing various vector (e.g., spatial boundaries, geology and geochronology) and raster (e.g., geophysical and proximity analysis layers) datasets into a unified coordinate reference system (EPSG4326). The datasets were rasterized into hexagonal blocks with distinct H3 addresses using the H3 Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS), an open-source framework developed by Uber Technologies Inc. under an Apache 2 license (Uber Technologies Inc., 2020 ) (Fig. 1 ). The H3 address is therefore a unique key of the database. The H3 DGGS is hierarchical and (nearly entirely) hexagonal. Hexagonal tessellation features equal-distance neighbors, which favor the depiction of isotropic and continuous spatial objects, such as roads, faults and lithological boundaries. It offers a complete coverage across multiple resolutions globally.

Illustration of spatial indexing process showing: ( a ) conversion of raster and vector datasets to a coordinate reference system for zonal statistics and spatial indexing with the H3 Discrete Global Grid System; and ( b ) joining of indexed data through unique H3 addresses

The integration and spatial indexing of both raster and vector data were performed at the seventh resolution level of the H3 DGGS, which contains over 98 million unique H3 addresses globally, with hexagons averaging an area of 5.16 km 2 and edge lengths of roughly 1.22 km. The “H3 Toolkit” plugin for QGIS was employed for spatial indexing ( https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/h3_toolkit/ ). Block-to-block rasterization (re-polygonization) was carried out using super-sampling, followed by vectorization into the H3 grid (e.g., for resampling geophysical datasets) using the method described in Nwaila et al. ( 2024 ). The spatially indexed datasets were then stored in a relational database, a data structure also known as a 'datacube' (Lu et al., 2018 ). Point vector interpolation was performed using either Gaussian processes, quadratic-inverse distance weighting, kernel density, or triangulated irregular network depending on the properties of the layer ( https://docs.qgis.org/3.28/en/docs/gentle_gis_introduction/spatial_analysis_interpolation.html ). For example, for derived maps such as fault proximity, buffered regions based on kernel density approximations were used.

Data Engineering—Geological Data

Datasets such as stratigraphy, geochronology, bedrock composition, and structural data were acquired from the CGS digital database ( https://maps.geoscience.org.za/portal/apps/sites/#/council-for-geoscience-interactive-web-map-1 ). Gaps in the data due to the use of provincial geological maps were supplemented with data from the seamless national geology database, scaled at 1:1 million. For MPM, rock sub-types were aggregated into 13 broader groups (rock classes), preserving the nomenclature as published by the CGS (Fig. 2 ). These classifications were subsequently consolidated into four overarching categories: (1) sedimentary, (2) igneous, (3) metamorphic, and (4) other. Chronological data were collated from CGS compilations and integrated, also adhering to the age designations from the CGS. While the original map data were preserved, geological periods were simplified into parental categories where possible. Fault data were compiled from both the CGS database and various mining sites, with no de-duplication conducted. Minor discrepancies between fault traces from separate sources are not expected to significantly influence national-scale prospectivity outcomes because grid distances to faults are typically much larger than potentially duplicated faults.

Geological dataset used in the study. Rock types are shown at the highest-level classification. Three classes (sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous) are sufficiently visible at this scale. The fourth class (other) is not visible. Positive data labels for PGE–Cr–Ni–Cu (n = 593) and Witwatersrand-type Au (n = 1073) deposits are overlaid on the map

Data Engineering—Geophysical Data

Geophysical datasets were chosen based on their coverage, relevance to the targeted mineral systems, and their ability to image subsurface structures from hundreds of meters to kilometers deep. These datasets are not exhaustive inputs for MPM, but they include common potential-field, radiometric and seismic datasets, which plausibly capture useful physical properties (e.g., density and acoustic velocity) at various depths. Seismic datasets from legacy passive teleseismic surveys were used. Depth estimates for the seismogenic Moho were derived from peer-reviewed sources and regional models specific to southern Africa. A radiometric (gamma ray) dataset was sourced from Andreoli et al. ( 2006 ). Gravity datasets were collected from various sources, including satellites, airborne surveys, and ground-based measurements. Free-air gravity was sourced from a combination of satellites (Akinrinade et al., 2021 ). The regional Bouguer gravity data across South Africa have an approximate station spacing of 14 km (Venter et al., 1999 ). These data were drift- and latitude-corrected (theoretical gravity based on IGSN71 and IGF67), free-air and Bouguer corrected with a reduction density of 2670 kg/m 3 .

In the 1990s, a passive teleseismic experiment (the South African Seismic Experiment) was carried out to understand the deeper crustal and mantle structure below South Africa (James et al., 2001 ). During the experiment, broadband seismometers were deployed in a swath across South Africa. Results showed a Mohorovičić discontinuity (Moho) that is deeper below the Proterozoic mobile belts (around 45 km) as compared to the Archean Kaapvaal Craton, where the Moho thins to around 35 km (Nguuri et al., 2001 ). The only exception is below the BC and Limpopo Belt to the northeast, where Moho depths increase to 45–50 km (Kgaswane et al., 2012 ). These Moho depths were in contradiction to prior expectation based on regional Bouguer gravity data. These data show a gravity low over the Kaapvaal Craton, which typically indicates a deeper Moho beneath the craton compared to the surrounding Proterozoic belts. Gravity modeling by Webb ( 2009 ) offered an alternative explanation—that the gravity low below the craton is instead due to changes in mantle composition below the craton, rather than changes in Moho depths. This possibility means that for MPM tasks, a combination of mantle composition and Moho depths are proxies to mineralization. Therefore, Moho and other datasets (e.g., gravity) still suit our task because: (1) relationships between evidence layers and targets were only modeled inferentially in this study; and (2) only extracted features were used, which are nonlinear transformations of the evidence layers. Derivative products of gravity included: (1) analytical signal; (2) horizontal gradient magnitude (HGM); (3) the first vertical derivative (1VD); and (4) tilt derivative (TD).

Regional magnetic data were collected over South Africa from the 1980s to the late 1990s (Stettler et al., 2000 ). The surveys were conducted in blocks and flight lines were every 1 km, with a flight height between 100 and 150 m. Tie lines were flown every 10 km at ninety degrees to the survey lines. The grids were stitched together by CGS (Ledwaba et al., 2009 ). The magnetic data were first reduced to pole using an average survey date of 1990/01/01. This filter acts to shift the magnetic anomaly directly over the body. There are several limitations to this filter, including that the data were collected over approximately 20 years and over a larger region, and several of the rock units will have strong remanent magnetization. Magnetic anomalies were transformed to align with the magnetic north pole using the differential method for reduction to pole (RTP) as outlined by Arkani-Hamed ( 2007 ). Other derivative outputs from the RTP-adjusted grids include: (1) analytic signal, (2) HGM, (3) 1VD, and (4) TD.

The derived potential datasets generally included derivatives to enhance the edges of bodies, and the TD to highlight the orientation of linear tectonic fabrics. For example, 1VD data facilitate the identification and delineation of magnetic variances within the upper crustal layers. HGM data permit the delineation of shallow magnetic sources, which serve to enhance the visibility of contours proximal to the HGM peaks. The limitation of these derived datasets is that they contain accentuated noise. In particular, for spatially joined datasets, the derived data can highlight flight lines and edges between the stitched blocks. As our MPM study is targeting larger, regional features, these shorter-wavelength features should not affect the realism of the outcome.

Seismic velocities in the upper mantle and teleseismic-based lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary estimations were sourced from White-Gaynor et al. ( 2020 ), Akinrinade et al. ( 2021 ), Xue & Olugboji ( 2021 ), and Olugboji et al. ( 2024 ). In general, regions with high seismic velocities (approximately 0.3–0.8% higher than the average for P-wave velocity and 0.5–1.3% higher for S-wave velocity, White-Gaynor et al., 2020 ) are typically associated with older, colder, and melt-depleted cratonic lithosphere found within continental interiors. This contrasts with areas where lithospheric regions have been influenced by younger asthenospheric melts, exhibiting relatively slower seismic velocities (approximately 0.3–1.0% lower than the average P-wave velocity and a 0.5–1.0% lower for S-wave velocity, White-Gaynor et al., 2020 ). These abrupt variations in seismic velocities, coupled with rapid changes in lithospheric thickness, are proxies for tectonic plate morphologies and deeper pathways of melts or fluids within the lithosphere. The focusing of mantle-derived fluids and melts into the overlying crust is also evident through rapid changes in crustal thickness, specifically the Moho depth.

Data Engineering—Mineral Deposits Data

Positive data labels are generally a combination of deposits and occurrences. Positive labels in this study were assembled from various sources including contributions from mining companies, pre-existing scholarly compilations, records of the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy in South Africa as well as from the U.S. Geological Survey (Padilla et al., 2021 ). The data encompassed a range of operational statuses: from active and historic mining sites to sites identified as promising through advanced-stage exploration activities. These were categorized as ‘deposits’ within the scope of this research, which were manually verified (e.g., using information about lithologies and mineralization), and if possible, using published geospatial boundaries depicting the extent of the deposit, as proxied by mining leases. This permitted the rasterization of positive labels using approximately the footprint of a deposit, rather than treating it as a point geometric object. A caveat of this type of rasterization is that it can cause sample clustering, which can increase model overfitting. However, our method is purposefully designed to reject overfitted models using spatial detection methods (discussed below).

The term ‘occurrences’ describes less definitive signs of mineral presence, such as geological prospects, surface indications, and notable drill interceptions that suggest but does not confirm the existence of a mineral deposit (e.g., Lawley et al., 2022 ). The context of the MPM product controls the composition of the positive labels. For example, more speculative targets can be derived using mineral occurrences as labels. Because a main intent of this study was method development and validation, it was important to utilize data labels that are more definitive of mineralization. We were able to accumulate sufficient positive labels using solely deposits because both the BC and the WB are extensively mined. This permitted us to directly compare our MPM products with knowledge of the target systems, with the caveat of a decreased novelty for targeting solely greenfield areas. Our MPM products can serve as a baseline for future applicative studies that integrate mineral occurrences data to target for more greenfield areas. We created two types of target labels: PGE–Cr–Ni–Cu deposits of the BC, and Witwatersrand-type Au deposits (Fig. 2 ). Post-hoc quality control was performed on the data labels to remove unclassifiable labels due to insufficient information or economic value. Additionally, we de-duplicated positive labels using a cross-referencing of names and geographical coordinates.

Comprehensive drilling data are generally sparse across the world, which would have provided a clear delineation of areas without mineralization, or ‘true negatives’. In the absence of such data, we adopted a statistical approach. A sufficiently large population of unlabeled cells in the dataset should statistically resemble negative labels because of the rarity of mineral deposits in general. Therefore, unlabeled cells were treated as proxies for true negatives, following Lawley et al. ( 2021 ). The selection of negative labels follows the data science workflow as a part of data engineering. Its variability introduces uncertainty (e.g., Zuo & Wang, 2020 ). For the purpose of data modeling, this type of labeling introduces uncertainty through noise injection into the negative labels (e.g., where a positive label is accidentally picked as a negative), which we propagated using multiple random sets of negative labels.

Data Modeling—Feature Extraction and Predictive Modeling

Feature extraction is performed in the most general manner possible to support modulation of ML algorithms downstream, through the use of autoencoders. Here, we provide a brief description; for full details in MPM context, see Zhang et al. ( 2024b ). Autoencoders are a form of feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) that exhibit a tapered architecture with a bottleneck (the coding layer). Given the bottleneck, autoencoders attempt to maximize the similarity of the input and output data. Consequently, some information, progressing generally from noise to useful information (Zhang et al., 2024a ), is variably discarded in a manner similar to truncating the number of components in principal components analysis. For dimensionality reduction, autoencoders are a generalization of principal components analysis because they make no assumption on the types of relationship in data (Kramer, 1991 ). Autoencoders extract features with the property that they are information-dense, maximally compact, de-correlated (linearly and nonlinearly) and unspecific to downstream algorithms. Consequently, modulation of feature space dimensionality is maximally productive and the broadest range of modeling algorithms could be used with extracted features.

To modulate the feature space dimensionality, we chose a range of coding layer sizes to: (1) explore a range of feature space density to incorporate the effects of the curse of dimensionality (Márquez, 2022 ), which affects model outcome in an algorithm-dependent manner (Zhang et al., 2024b ); and (2) capture the range of dimensions that MPM practitioners may practically choose. For (2), it is important to generate a range of feature space dimensions, such that they cover likely outcomes of elbow-based selection heuristics, which are not ideal but about the only objective criterion available (Ketchen et al., 1996 ). Therefore, the range should be sized to visibly cover a data reconstruction performance curve, such that concavity is clearly visible. This ensures that most practical choices of the number of dimensions around the elbow region of the curve are represented in the modulation of feature space dimensionality.

For the predictive modeling phase of the workflow, modulation must encompass a set of algorithms that could be used by MPM practitioners to mimic inter-practitioner variability. This is impossible to accomplish empirically. Firstly, published MPM literature only captures a few successful candidates and not all choices, especially unsatisfactory ones (a positive outcome bias in MPM literature that is not explicitly recognized in geodata science but is in other domains; Mlinarić et al., 2017 ). Consequently, MPM literature cannot be generally used to perform a meta-analysis of algorithmic feasibility, particularly as it is context dependent (e.g., data used). Secondly, there is no limit to the diversity of feasible algorithms because, in addition to development of new algorithms, existing ones are often modified. Algorithmic diversity for MPM is plausibly the largest source of workflow variability because the novelty of many MPM publications focused on algorithmic success (Zhang et al., 2024b ). Consequently, it is impossible to rank-order all algorithms that could be used for MPM in terms of their success rate. First principles indicate that it is feasible to capture the effects of change in ML algorithm because algorithmic variability affects the number of degrees of freedom in the resulting models, which control their epistemic characteristics. Simpler algorithms typically result in less degrees of freedom (e.g., linear regression) as compared with more complex models (e.g., tree-based methods) and universal functional approximators with unlimited complexity (e.g., ANNs). Therefore, it is practical to adopt a range of algorithms that can modulate model complexity, which facilitates a range of “fitted-ness” (relatively overfit or underfit).

We adopted the same set of algorithms as Zhang et al. ( 2024b ), which included: (1) simple algorithms—k-nearest neighbors (kNN; Tikhonov, 1943 ; Fix & Hodges, 1951 ; Cover & Hart, 1967 ) and logistic regression (LR; Cramer, 2002 ); (2) moderately complex algorithms—Gaussian process (GP; Rasmussen & Williams, 2006 ; Kotsiantis, 2007 ) and support vector machines (SVM; Vapnik, 1998 ); and (3) high complexity algorithms—ANN (Curry, 1944 ; Rosenblatt, 1961 ; Rumelhart et al., 1985 ; Hastie et al., 2009 ; Lemaréchal, 2012 ), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting of decision trees (AB; Ho, 1995 ; Breiman, 1996a , b ; Freund & Schapire, 1997 ; Breiman, 2001 ; Kotsiantis, 2014 ; Sagi & Rokach, 2018 ); and extremely randomized or extra trees (ET; Geurts et al., 2006 ). Similar to that in Zhang et al. ( 2024b ), ANN is used for both shallow and deep learning (autoencoder coupled with predictive modeling). These algorithms and their hyperparameters are described in Zhang et al. ( 2024b ). Here, we forwent a full description of these algorithms and their hyperparameters, but highlight that the effect of the hyperparameters is mainly to control model complexity by modulating the complexity of the decision boundaries in feature space. For the hyperparameters, see Table 1 . We withheld 25% of training data for testing and employed a four-fold cross-validation for model construction, guided by either the F1 score or the area under the curve of the receiver-operating-curve (AUC–ROC) (Fawcett, 2006 ). These two metrics are intended to measure either model discriminatory power (AUC–ROC) or quality of predictions (F1 score). To modulate the choice of negative labels, we randomly sampled five different sets of negative labels. The size of negative labels was chosen to achieve class balance. In summary, there were 13 feature dimensions, 8 algorithms, 2 model selection metrics, and 5 sets of negative labels, resulting in 1040 unique workflows per target.

Geospatial Component—Geospatial and Model Consensus Analysis

In the geodata science extension, the spatial domain performance can be assessed through a mathematical formulation of the goal of MPM, which is to reduce the search area for mineral deposits. To measure area, we adopted the spatial selectivity ( \(SS\) ) metric that was used by Zhang et al. ( 2024b ). It is assessed as the site fraction that is prospective and is an aspatial generalization of the occupied area metric, which is technically a spatial metric that measures areal ratios (Mihalasky & Bonham-Carter, 2001 ). Compared to the areal formulation of the occupied area metric, \(SS\) has an advantage for aspatial modeling methods because: (1) aspatial and even spatial algorithms do not consider areas (only grid-cell connectivity or notions of neighborhood); and (2) at large spatial scales, it is impossible to create equal-cell-area grids. Therefore, \(SS\) provides a similar result as occupied area, but does not incur gridding-induced areal distortion.

For joint analysis of spatial and variable domain performance, we used the variable-spatial metric ( \(VS\) ). It was introduced in its fractional form by Zhang et al. ( 2024b ) because it was a generalization of the normalized density metric (Mihalasky & Bonham-Carter, 2001 ). Fractional formulation is better for developmental purposes because it intentionally reveals relationships of model behavior between the spatial and variable domains. For model merging, this metric is not useful because although its domain is 0 to 1 for both numerator and denominators, its range is unbounded. Hence, we created a range-limited version of this metric, which is the product of: (1) a data science metric; and (2) one minus \(SS\) . For example, using the F1 metric, \(VS = (F1 score)\cdot (1-SS)\) . This metric’s range is bounded between 0 to 1 and, besides, it is equally sensitive to both variable and spatial domains. For example, for all models with the same F1 score, \(VS\) increases if \(SS\) decreases, and vice versa at the same rate. A better MPM model across both domains features a higher \(VS\) score, unless it is extremely overfitted.

A diversity of models produced through modulated workflows naturally ranges from relatively underfitted (e.g., using simple algorithms) to overfitted (e.g., using complex algorithms), which controls the information content of the models. Model usability depends on context. For large ensembles, underfitted models are desirable because they function similarly to weak learners in ensemble ML algorithms (e.g., RF), which means that their average is statistically robust and meaningful. Spatially, they identify prospective areas beyond training data with variable dissent, which means that users of MPM products are well informed in terms of exploration risk. In contrast, extremely overfitted models do not add new information to the ensemble and are useless because they mostly predict the training data as prospective. Such models are not always detectable within the data science workflow using out-of-sample testing, especially where data labels are clustered (which is probable for solely using mine footprints as positive labels), which means detection is more robust in the spatial domain (Zhang et al., 2024b ).

Extremely overfitted models result from two conditions for MPM tasks (Zhang et al., 2024b ): (1) an enabling geoscientific condition—finite feature diversity of positive labels, resulting from a lack of lithodiversity of mineral deposits or occurrences, relative to the diversity of negative labels; and (2) the absence of a constraint in spatial optimization—there is no lower-bound to the minimum search space. If positive labels capture a small subset of all lithodiversity, then negative labels represent a far larger volume of the feature space, which enables decision boundaries to become tightly bound to positive labels. Consequently, out-of-sample testing is ineffective to detect overfitting because the out-of-sample and in-sample labels are substantially similar. This effect is enhanced by high feature space dimensionality (Zhang et al., 2024b ). The enabling condition should be addressed through data engineering (e.g., surveys to discover new positive labels) and cannot be addressed within the current geodata science framework because no data augmentation method can add synthetic diversity to positive labels in the manner of greenfield discoveries. This implies that models fitted using augmented data are further biased toward brownfield discoveries because exploration data are already biased (Porwal et al., 2015 ; Yousefi et al., 2021 ).

The lack of a constraint is a general problem caused by low velocity geodata because high data velocity enables “just-in-time” or post-deployment validation (which is exceedingly rare, if at all for MPM). This is exacerbated by the mostly academic nature of, and a positive outcome bias in, MPM, which creates perpetual challenges with product validation. The constraint problem can be solved within the geodata science framework by reframing the best practice of model acceptance criteria from applicative data science-domains to MPM (e.g., Shearer, 2000 ; Hazzan & Mike, 2023 ). Minimum acceptable performance is specified by users of data science models. However, MPM products are almost entirely published without identifiable clients (despite the mineral industry being a primary MPM product user), which implies that there are no user-specified constraints. Moreover, the usability of MPM products should never be solely evaluated by their creators because of a conflict of interest. To remediate this weakness, where MPM products (and similar geodata products) do not directly serve end-users, we engineered a spatial constraint using minimum spatial selectivity as a model acceptance criterion. It is based on the distinction between deposit scale exploration and mineral reconnaissance. We considered areas that are at least one order of magnitude greater than the summary area of positive labels as acceptable, which is implied by the distinction that reconnaissance must occur at a scale that is much larger than deposit scale exploration. This permits us to complete model acceptance during model deployment using geospatial analysis after predictive modeling. A summary for the entire workflow is shown in Figure 3 .

Summary of the geodata science workflow used for consensus-based MPM in this study. All modulations of components are indicated below each component in curly brackets

Geological Context

Pge–cr–ni–cu deposits of the bushveld complex.

The Paleoproterozoic BC (2.060–2.055 Ga; Walraven et al., 1990 ; Scoates & Wall, 2015 ; Zeh et al., 2015 ; Mungall et al., 2016 ) sits in the northeastern portion of the Kaapvaal Craton in South Africa. It is world-renown for its chromitite reef deposits. Its physical extent and its resources are well known. Notably, it has been divided into the: (1) Rooiberg Group, (2) Rustenburg Layered Suite (RLS), (3) Rashoop Granophyre Suite, and (4) Lebowa Granite Suite (SACS, 1980 ). Spatially, it is divided into five lobes, the: (1) eastern, (2) western, (3) northern, (4) southeastern, and (5) far-western lobes (Fig. 4 ). In addition, it has a number of satellite intrusions, notably the Barneveld, Helvetia, Losberg, Mashaneng, Moloto, Mooifontein, Rhenosterhoekspruit, and Uikomst intrusions, as well as the Molopo Farms Complex (Cawthorn, 1987 ; Cawthorn et al., 2006 ).

Location of (inset, top left) and simplified geological map of the Bushveld Complex (modified from Bourdeau et al., 2020 )

Of particular importance to this study is the RLS, which constitutes the world’s largest layered ultramafic–mafic intrusion, with a coverage of 40,000 km 2 and thickness of ≤ 8 km (Eales & Cawthorn, 1996 ; Cawthorn et al., 2015 ). The RLS intruded at shallow crustal levels (<12 km; Zeh et al., 2015 ) between the Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic Transvaal Supergroup sediments (floor) and the Rooiberg Group rocks (roof; Fig. 4 ). Based on major isotopic and mineralogical changes, the suite is divided into five stratigraphic zones (from bottom to top): Marginal, Lower, Critical, Main, and Upper zones (SACS, 1980 ; Kruger, 1994 ). Overall, rocks of the RLS grade from poorly-layered norites (Marginal Zone), to layered dunite, harzburgite and pyroxenite (Lower Zone), layered pyroxenite–norite–anorthosite–chromitite (Critical Zone), poorly-layered gabbronorite (Main Zone), and ferrogabbro–anorthosite–magnetitite and apatite-bearing diorite (Upper Zone) (Eales & Cawthorn, 1996 ; Cawthorn et al., 2015 ).

The BC hosts the world’s largest resources and reserves of PGEs. Notably, 191 metric tons of PGEs (i.e., Pt and Pd) were mined from the BC in 2023, accounting for 49% of world production (Schulte, 2024 ). In addition, it was estimated that 88% (63,000 metric tons) of the world’s PGE reserves are found within the complex (Schulte, 2024 ). Interestingly, every chromitite-rich layer of the BC contains some PGEs (Cawthorn, 2010 ). In addition to PGEs, Cr, Ni and Cu are also extracted from the ore. All significant PGE ore deposits are hosted within the Critical Zone of the RLS and include the Merensky Reef, UG2 Chromitite and Platreef. Economical chromitite layers contain abundant chromite (≤ 43.3% Cr 2 O 3 ), pyrrhotite, pentlandite and pyrite, can reach measure up to 1 m in thickness and contain up to 3 g/ton PGE, often with high proportions of Rhodium (Rh) and lesser amounts of Iridium (Ir) and Ruthenium (Ru) (Cawthorn, 2010 ).

Witwatersrand-type Au Deposits

The Mesoarchean WB is located at the center of the Kaapvaal Craton (Fig. 5 ) and it is the largest known accumulation and source of gold globally (Frimmel, 2019 ). Apart from hosting gold, the WB also hosts one of the world’s major uranium (U) resources (>200,000 metric tons; Frimmel, 2019 ). It is defined by a set of overlapping cratonic successor basins, altogether resting on Paleo- to Mesoarchean granitoid–greenstone terranes belonging to the Kaapvaal Craton. Altogether, the WB extends for ~ 350 km in a northeasterly direction and ~ 200 km in a northwesterly direction, and it reaches a thickness of 7 km (Frimmel, 2019 ). At the base of the WB are the Dominion Group rocks (3.086–3.087 Ga; Armstrong et al., 1991 ; Robb et al., 1992 ) consisting of a thin siliciclastic basal unit overlain by a bimodal volcanic sequence. Overlying the Dominion Group is the Witwatersrand Supergroup, which is further divided into the West and Central Rand groups. The West Rand Group is composed of quartzite and shale, with minor conglomerate beds in the upper part of the group, altogether deposited in a marine shelf environment (Eriksson et al., 1981 ; Frimmel, 2019 ). Paleocurrent data indicate that the sediment source was to the north–northeast (Frimmel & Minter, 2002 ). The Central Rand Group (upper age limit of 2.790 Ga; Gumsley et al., 2018 ) was deposited following a 10 m.y. sedimentation hiatus (Minter, 2006 ; Frimmel & Nwaila, 2020 ). This group is dominated by fluvial and fluvio–deltaic sandstones and conglomerates, separated by erosional unconformities, deposited in a retro-arc foreland basin environment (Catuneanu, 2001 ).

Location of (inset, top left) and simplified geological map of the Witwatersrand Basin (modified after Frimmel et al., 2005 ). Note that the younger sequences (Ventersdorp and Transvaal supergroups) covering the basin are omitted

Following the deposition of the Witwatersrand Supergroup, the WB was peneplaned after the stabilization of the Kaapvaal Craton. The supergroup was then overlain by the predominantly volcanic Ventersdorp Supergroup (~3 km thick) and subsequently by the Transvaal Supergroup sediments (~15 km thick) (Burger and Coertze, 1975 ; Poujol et al., 2005 ). The burial, dewatering, crustal thickening, and emplacement of the BC, followed by the Vredefort meteorite impact (2.023 Ga; Kamo et al., 1996 ; also see Vredefort Dome in Fig. 5 ), resulted in widespread low-grade metamorphism (except near the impact crater) and post-depositional hydrothermal alteration of Witwatersrand rocks (Frimmel et al., 2005 ).

Goldfields are predominantly found along the northern and western edges of the WB (Fig. 5 ). To date, the Witwatersrand goldfields have produced about 53,000 metric tons of gold, or approximately one-third of all gold mined in history, and account for 30% of global known resources (Frimmel, 2014 , 2019 ). For decades, exploration of gold in the WB has been motivated by the possibility of gold-rich outlying remnants. The historic discovery of the Evander Basin in the early 1950s, facilitated by pioneering airborne aeromagnetic surveys, significantly motivated further exploration. This event led to extensive regional gravity and magnetic surveys across the entire craton. Gold deposits in the WB primarily occur in coarse-grained siliciclastic rocks (e.g., conglomerates) and are often locally referred to as ‘reefs’, with sharp lower and upper contacts but are laterally extensive. Gold concentrations within these reefs can range attain up to 25 g/ton Au (AngloGold Ashanti, 2014 ). Notably, gold has been extracted from over 30 different reefs, with majority of them (95% of production) located in the Central Rand Group (Robb & Robb, 1998 ). Cross-cutting features such as faults and veins in the WB also host minor amounts of gold, with such features being more auriferous near or within mineralized reefs (Frimmel et al., 2005 ). The subsequent peneplanation of the Witwatersrand Supergroup also resulted in the re-mobilization of gold into younger sequences, notably in the Ventersdorp Contact Reef (Ventersdorp Supergroup) and the Black Reef Formation (Transvaal Supergroup), which has since produced 40 metric tons of gold (Frimmel, 2018 ; Frimmel & Nwaila, 2020 ).

Feature Extraction

Modulation of feature space dimensionality resulted in 13 sets of features, with their dimensionality spanning from 5 to 17. The autoencoder’s data reconstruction performance varied from about 0.95 to 0.77, as averaged over 25 trials per coding layer size, using randomized network weights. The loss in performance was generally gradual over this range, but with a steeper loss below a coding layer size of 9 and a slower loss above 13 (Fig. 6 ). The performance of the autoencoder as a function of coding layer size showed a concave curvature and steeper losses at the lowest coding layer sizes and a saturation in performance at highest sizes. Concavity is indicative of an elbow structure. However, the location of the elbow was ambiguous, whose exact value is unimportant for this study, but is likely to be around 11 nodes. It is important to appreciate that these sets of features cover a sufficient span of feature space dimensions around the probable elbow portion of the performance curve.

Autoencoder’s reconstruction performance as measured using the coefficient of determination (CoD) as a function of the coding layer size

PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr Deposits

In total, 1025 models met the spatial acceptance criterion and were used for subsequent analyses. The relationship between model performance in the spatial and variable domains was noisy, poor or non-existent (Fig. 7 ). Our results corroborated the findings of Zhang et al. ( 2024b ) that the spatial selectivity of tree-based methods was insensitive or ambiguous to model performance in the variable domain (Fig. 7 ). On average, the AUC–ROC scores of models were systematically higher than the F1 (weighted) scores (Fig. 8 a). Moreover, the spatial outcome of models was more strongly affected by tuning using the F1 (weighted) metric than the AUC–ROC metric (Fig. 8 b). Tuning models using the AUC–ROC metric produced less spatially discriminating models, despite high AUC–ROC scores (the slopes are substantially different, Fig. 8 ). The joint spatial-variable domain performance of the ensemble was distributed with bias toward higher values (between 0.90 and 0.95) (Fig. 9 a).

Performance assessments of the variable and spatial domains of all models tuned using the weighted F1 metric, categorized by algorithm. kNN = k-nearest neighbors, SVM = support vector machines, RF = random forest, ET = extremely randomized or extra trees, AB = adaptive boosting of decision trees, LR = logistic regression, ANN = artificial neural network, and GP = Gaussian process

( a ) Performance distribution of models in the variable domain. ( b ) Aggregate analysis of all models that are tuned using the F1 (weighted) or AUC–ROC metrics. kNN = k-nearest neighbors, SVM = support vector machines, RF = random forest, ET = extremely randomized or extra trees, AB = adaptive boosting of decision trees, LR = logistic regression, ANN = artificial neural network, and GP = Gaussian process

( a ) Performance distribution of models in both the spatial and variable domains using the \(VS\) metric. ( b ) Convergence of random subsamples (number of trials is inversely proportional to sample size, such that at the lowest sample size of 20 samples, there is a total of 100 trials) of the ensemble to the consensus model, using the \(VS\) metric. CoD = coefficient of determination

To assess the ensemble’s rate of convergence, we analyzed the similarity between random subsets of models and the full consensus model (Fig. 9 b). It can be seen that convergence was relatively rapid and an elbow was reached by 200 models. It is impossible to present visualizations of all models independently due to the ensemble’s size. Therefore, to assist readers with visualizing the ensemble of models and the convergence process, an animated video is provided in Supplementary Material 2. In terms of the modulated components of the data science workflow, the absolute impact on the spatial selectivity score was: ML algorithm (7.7%); feature space dimensionality (4.4%); hyperparameter tuning metric (0.7%); and negative labels (0.6%). Therefore, sensitivity can be calculated as the absolute impact divided by the number of choices per component, which resulted in a sensitivity ranking: ML algorithm (1%); hyperparameter tuning metric (0.4%); feature space dimensionality (0.3%); and negative labels (0.1%).

The consensus model was merged using all acceptable models (Fig. 10 ). The consensus was strong for positive prospectivity around the BC, roughly corresponding to the location of the RLS (Fig. 5 ). These areas are expected findings because the training data contained positive labels there (Fig. 2 ). However, a strong positive consensus was found over the Waterberg plateau (blue arrow in Fig. 10 , also see Fig. 4 ). This finding is a surprise (and greenfield in the sense of data used) because there are no positive labels there. Notably, an abundance of literature accepts that the Vila Nora and northern lobe segments are connected at depth (e.g., Huthmann et al., 2016 ). However, its PGE potential remains unexplored. A lesser degree of consensus was found in the sedimentary successions of the Transvaal Supergroup, notably from Pretoria (externally surrounding the BC) and Postmasburg (near the center of South Africa) groups. Notably, the Transvaal Supergroup is known to host a number of Fe, Mn, Mississippi Valley-type, and structurally-controlled gold deposits (Eriksson et al., 2006 and references therein). While it is possible that the diminished consensus was influenced by known and extensive iron deposits within the supergroup, it is worthwhile to note that the supergroup has yet to be evaluated for PGEs, Ni, Cu, and Cr. The patchwork of dissent toward the north and northwest presents another possibility. This area consists of variable lithologies associated with the Kaapvaal Craton (granite–greenstone terranes) and Limpopo Belt (which joins the Kaapvaal Craton with the Zimbabwe Craton to the north). However, similar to the sequences of the Transvaal Supergroup, the area is underexplored. In terms of data-driven discoveries, these aforementioned areas were not covered by the training data (Fig. 2 ) and are therefore novel discoveries made possible by MPM. The findings confirm that the consensus-based method is effective because known exploration regions are predicted to exhibit a high degree of consensus, and lowered consensus or some level of dissent is observed in regions that are plausible given knowledge of the BC.

The consensus model for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr (of 1025 individual models). The color bar depicts the degree of consensus to dissent. Values closer to either 1 or 0 mean high consensus of either prospective or non-prospective sites. Values near 0.5 mean strong dissent. The outline of the Rustenburg Layered Suite which contains known and notable PGE deposits is in green. The blue arrow highlights the continuation of the RLS beneath the Waterberg plateau

Witwatersrand-type Gold Deposits

In total, 773 models met the spatial acceptance criterion. The relationship between model performance in the spatial and variable domains was noisy, poor or non-existent (Fig. 11 ). The spatial selectivity of tree-based methods was insensitive to model performance in the variable domain (Fig. 11 ). This is consistent with the trend observed thus far and by Zhang et al. ( 2024b ). On average, the AUC–ROC scores of all models were higher than the F1 (weighted) scores (Fig. 12 a). For Au, the pattern was similar to that for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr – the spatial outcome of models was more strongly affected by tuning using the F1 (weighted) metric than the AUC–ROC metric (Fig. 12 b). The joint spatial-variable domain performance of the ensemble was clustered, for example, between 0.85 and 0.95, with a smaller population from 0.85 to 0.75 (Fig. 13 a). The ensemble’s rate of convergence was qualitatively similar to that of PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr (Fig. 13 b). It can be seen that convergence was relatively rapid and an elbow was reached by 200 random models. To assist readers with visualizing the large ensemble of models and the convergence-to-consensus process, an animated video is provided in Supplementary Material 3. In terms of the modulated components in the data science workflow, the absolute impact on the spatial selectivity score was: feature space dimensionality (13.7%); ML algorithm (12.3%); hyperparameter tuning metric (1.0%); and negative labels (0.5%). The sensitivity ranking was: ML algorithm (1.5%); feature space dimensionality (1.1%); hyperparameter tuning metric (0.5%); and negative labels (0.1%).

The consensus model strongly supports the positive prospectivity of the WB, with internal variability (Fig. 14 ). This variability was expected, given that most of the lithologies belonging to the WB are covered by younger sequences, notably by the Ventersdorp and Transvaal supergroups. This model highlights a pronounced consensus for high prospectivity particularly in the northern and western portions of the WB, areas that now stand as focal points for potential exploration and development (Fig. 14 ). However, the model also identifies areas of strong dissent, most notably to the southwest and north of the WB (Fig. 14 ). This dissent increases radially outward from high positive consensus regions, specifically from the western portion of the WB, suggesting a riskier exploration landscape.

The consensus model for the Witwatersrand-type Au (of 773 individual models). The color bar depicts the degree of consensus to dissent. Values closer to 1 or 0 mean high consensus of either prospective or non-prospective sites. Values at 0.5 mean strong dissent. The outline of the Witwatersrand Basin, which contains known and notable Au deposits, is in green. The outline of the Transvaal Supergroup is in white, and the inferred extent (southern portion overlain by younger Karoo Supergroup rocks) of the Ventersdorp Supergroup is in blue. The inferred outline of the Ventersdorp Supergroup is from Humbert et al. ( 2019 )

The areas of strong dissent are associated with known re-mobilized WB Au deposits into the Ventersdorp (Ventersdorp Contact Reef) and Transvaal (Black Reef Formation) supergroups (Frimmel, 2018 ; Frimmel & Nwaila, 2020 ). Previously undocumented is the extent of the Ventersdorp lithologies beneath the younger sequences of the Karoo Supergroup. The extent of these is denoted in Figure 14 . Thus, adding to the understanding of the WB's prospectivity, our results uncovered additional potential for Witwatersrand-type Au mineralization along the peripheral margins of the known basin. Combined with our data-driven findings, there exists a broader and underexplored area of potential for new discoveries beyond the traditional boundaries of the WB (Fig. 5 ). The rich potential within the established boundaries of the WB lends validity to our consensus model. The findings confirm that the consensus-based method is effective also for Witwatersrand-type Au because known exploration regions were predicted to exhibit a high degree of consensus for positive prospectivity, and some level of dissent is observed in regions that are plausible given knowledge of the WB.

Implications for Exploration

The main sources of known inter-practitioner variability in MPM were propagated as uncertainty into our MPM products. For our models, the biggest source of variability was the choice of ML algorithm, which is at least one order of magnitude more significant than the variability introduced by the selection of negative labels (the smallest source). This finding builds scientific consensus upon the much larger scale study conducted by Zhang et al. ( 2024b ) (multiple continents, more data). The deep ensembles converged rapidly, which implies that: (1) the diversity of workflows was sufficient to produce consensus; and (2) a small amount of additional unexplored workflows is unlikely to significantly perturb the predictions. Therefore, we are reasonably confident that our consensus model is statistically robust. However, we cannot preclude the possibility that differences in data engineering, such as the resolution and variety of evidence layers may produce an appreciable impact. Although we have employed evidence layers that are the best available to our knowledge, it is still possible to add evidence layers but it would be difficult to replace all of them. The fastest timescales of variability are within the data usage portion of the data pipeline, as data science is optimized for big data analysis and workflow automation. Changes in evidence layers occur much more slowly (e.g., new national-scale surveys) on the timescales of data generation, which is not generally automatable and produces low velocity data (Bourdeau et al., 2024 ). We therefore expect our MPM products to be durable, at least until substantial new national-scale data have accumulated to warrant a re-investigation. Consequently, because of our explicit design for robustness and durability, our MPM products are much more suitable than singleton MPM products to guide the slower and riskier task of mineral exploration.

For MPM, consensus maps and (deep) workflow ensembles represent a significant methodology advancement, akin to the formulation of a data-driven version of expert opinion-aggregation. Because this method mitigates the key weakness of a poor coupling between spatial and variable domain outcomes in the geodata science framework, it improves stakeholder trust in MPM products. The level of consensus and dissent directly captures spatial targeting changes that can occur between different MPM practitioners tackling the same challenge. A large ensemble means that the statistical nature of the ensemble is more relevant than individual models, and as such, there are two main benefits: (1) no single model (or MPM practitioner) is solely relied upon; and (2) there is a spatial depiction of a probable range of targets without losing the extreme values (e.g., less probable targets in areas of high dissent). Therefore, our MPM products are substantially more reliable than singleton models. An improved methodology is important to the mineral industry because committing a higher level of effort in the reconnaissance stage results in MPM products that better match the timescales and risks of mineral exploration and are more likely to attract investment.

Our analysis revealed a qualitatively significant spatial conformity of our MPM products to geoscientific knowledge of well-explored regions for both the BC and WB. In particular, the delineation of high-confidence positive areas was generally sharp for the BC and variable for the WB. This was expected given the igneous and modified-sedimentary natures of the BC and the WB, respectively. Additional regions with promising exploration potential were also identified. For PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr, the continuation of the northern lobe beneath the Waterberg plateau is a high-confidence target (Fig. 10 ). This area's known geological context, combined with our model's insights, underscores its potential for mineral exploration. Moreover, the vast and underexplored regions toward the northern tip of South Africa present variably interesting areas for these commodities, each with unique geological characteristics that could hint at untapped mineral wealth. The underexplored nature of these regions highlights the need for targeted research and exploration to assess their potential economic viability. For Au, the extension of the WB to the southwest is a large and potentially fruitful area (Fig. 14 ). This region, large and relatively underexplored in the context of its gold potential, could bear extensions of the mineralization patterns known within the WB. Beyond that, and to a lesser degree of consensus, areas to the north of the WB could also be considered, but are riskier.

Benefits to the Mineral Industry and Conclusion

Mineral exploration is at an all-time-high because of demand, market competition and resource contention. These factors will continue to drive changes in the mineral industry. A shift from knowledge- to data-driven exploration methods continues, enabled by an accumulation of data, new instruments, computer power and big-data-suitable algorithms. A key question that we have witnessed from the mineral industry is: how trustworthy are individual mineral prospectivity maps? This is a difficult question to answer because of an unbounded diversity of MPM workflows, whose spatial impacts are not trivial on prospectivity maps, and an inability of the geodata science framework to accept spatial constraints. The question aligns with the scientific expectation that singleton experimental outcomes are not reliable without consensus. This is a thorny issue for MPM because MPM products and methods are of value mainly to the industry but are seldom validated and mainly academic in origin. Ideally, MPM as a geodata science product should a-priori take as a constraint—user requirements, which for MPM is the extent of area that is feasible to explore, then produce the best product meeting that constraint. The only way to deterministically reduce the search area given a weakly unidirectionally-coupled framework is to create a deep ensemble of models and select a spatial extent based on the level of consensus (or dissent). Where low-risk exploration is desirable, areas of positive prospectivity at a high level of consensus can be targeted. Where truly greenfield and often black swan discoveries are desirable, areas of significant dissent can be targeted, with the obvious caveat that such areas are risky.

South Africa has had a long history of mining. Although no one knows for sure, there may still be appreciable economic resources. Historically, both the BC and WB were opportunistic, black swan discoveries, the likes of which, there are no comparable entities elsewhere. Therefore, discovering smaller ore deposits using modern methods could seem to be a much less daunting challenge in comparison. However, exploration is faced with the increasingly brownfield nature of the world. Within this setting, there lies opportunity—the accumulation of data. The timing is ripe for South Africa to envision a future on the labor of the past—legacy data and exploration knowledge, to make a renewed effort to rejuvenate its mineral industry and therefore, its economy and job prospects for the youth. In this context, this study serves both the global MPM and South African communities by providing: an applicative version of a scientific consensus-based MPM method, and to the extent possible, its validation; a comprehensive datacube that could be used for other targets and MPM method validation (by serving as “certified reference materials”); and hope for South Africans.

Agterberg, F. P. (1989). Computer programs for mineral exploration. Science, 245 , 76–81.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Agterberg, F. P. (1992). Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence modeling for resource evaluation. Nonrenewable Resources, 1 (1), 39–50.

Article   Google Scholar  

Agterberg, F. P., & Cheng, Q. (2002). Conditional independence test for weights-of-evidence modeling. Natural Resources Research, 11 , 249–255.

Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Cheng, Q., & Wright, D. F. (1993). Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression in mineral potential mapping. In J. C. Davis & U. C. Herzfeld (Eds.), Computers in Geology (pp. 13–32). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar  

Akinrinade, O. J., Li, C.-F., & Afelumo, A. J. (2021). Geodynamic processes inferred from Moho and Curie depths in Central and Southern African Archean Cratons. Tectonophysics, 815 , 228993.

Alozie A C (2019) Sustainable management of mineral resource active regions: a participatory framework for the application of systems thinking. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London

An, P., Moon, W. M., & Rencz, A. (1991). Application of fuzzy set theory to integrated mineral exploration. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, 27 , 1–11.

An, P., Moon, W. M., & Bonham-Carter, G. F. (1994). Uncertainty management in integration of exploration data using the belief function. Nonrenewable Resources, 3 (1), 60–71.

Andreoli, M. A., Hart, R. J., Ashwal, L. D., & Coetzee, H. (2006). Correlations between U, Th content and metamorphic grade in the western Namaqualand Belt, South Africa, with implications for radioactive heating of the crust. Journal of Petrology, 47 (6), 1095–1118.

Arkani-Hamed, J. (2007). Differential reduction to the pole: Revisited. Geophysics, 72 (1), L13–L20. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2399370

Armstrong, R. A., Compston, W., Retief, E. A., Williams, I. S., & Welke, H. (1991). Zircon ion microprobe studies bearing on the age and evolution of the Witwatersrand Triad. Precambrian Research, 53 , 243–266.

Ashanti, AngloGold. (2014). Mineral resource and ore reserve report (p. 194). AngloGold Ashanti Ltd.

Bonham-Carter, G. F. (1994). Geographic information systems for geoscientists: Modelling with GIS (p. 398). Pergamon Press.

Bourdeau, J. E., Zhang, S. E., Hayes, B., & Logue, A. (2020). Field, petrographical and geochemical characterization of a layered anorthosite sequence in the upper main zone of the bushveld complex. South African Journal of Geology, 123 (3), 277–296.

Bourdeau, J. E., Zhang, S. E., Nwaila, G. T., & Ghorbani, Y. (2024). Data generation for exploration geochemistry: Past, present and future. Applied Geochemistry . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106124

Breiman, L. (1996a). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24 (2), 123–140.

Breiman, L. (1996b). Stacked regressions. Machine Learning, 24 (1), 49–64.

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 , 5–32.

Brown, W. M., Gedeon, T. D., Groves, D. I., & Barnes, R. G. (2000). Artificial neural networks: a new method for mineral prospectivity mapping. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 47 (4), 757–770.

Burger, A. J., & Coertze, F. J. (1975). Age determinations—April 1972 to march 1974, technical report. Annals of the Geological Survey of South Africa, 11 , 317–321.

Burkin, J. N., Lindsay, M. D., Occhipinti, S. A., & Holden, E. J. (2019). Incorporating conceptual and interpretation uncertainty to mineral prospectivity modeling. Geoscience Frontiers, 10 (4), 1383–1396.

Cai, L., & Zhu, Y. (2015). The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal, 14 , 1–10.

Carranza, E. J. M. (2017). Natural resources research publications on geochemical anomaly and mineral potential mapping, and introduction to the special issue of papers in these fields. Natural Resources Research, 26 , 379–410.

Carranza, E. J. M., & Hale, M. (2000). Spatial association of mineral occurrences and curvilinear geological features. Mathematical Geology, 34 , 199–217.

Carranza, E. J. M., & Hale, M. (2002). Geologically constrained probabilistic mapping of gold potential, Baguio District, Philippines. Natural Resources Research, 9 , 237–253.

Carranza, E. J. M., & Laborte, A. G. (2015). Random forest predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity with small number of prospects and data with missing values in Abra (Philippines). Computers & Geosciences, 74 , 60–70.

Carranza, E. J. M., Woldai, T., & Chikambwe, E. M. (2005). Application of data-driven evidential belief functions to prospectivity mapping for aquamarine-bearing pegmatites, Lundazi district, Zambia. Natural Resources Research, 14 , 47–63.

Carranza, E. J. M., Hale, M., & Faassen, C. (2008). Selection of coherent deposit-type locations and their application in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping. Ore Geology Reviews, 33 , 536–558.

Carranza, E. J. M. (2008). Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS: Amsterdam. In M. Hale (Eds.), Handbook of exploration and environmental geochemistry (vol. 11, p. 351). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Castillo, E., del Real, I., & Roa, C. (2023). Critical minerals versus major minerals: a comparative study of exploration budgets. Mineral Economics , 1-12.

Catuneanu, O. (2001). Flexural partitioning of the late Archaean Witwatersrand foreland system, South Africa. Sedimentary Geology, 141 , 95–112.

Cawthorn, R. G. (1987). Extensions to the platinum resources of the Bushveld Complex. South African Journal of Science, 83 (2), 69–71.

Cawthorn, R. G. (2010). The platinum group element deposits of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa. Platinum Metals Review, 54 (4), 205–215.

Cawthorn, R. G. (2015). The Bushveld Complex, South Africa. In B. Charlier, O. Namur, R. Latypov, & C. Tegner (Eds.), Layered Intrusions (pp. 517–587). Springer.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Cawthorn, R. G., Eales, H. V., Uken, R., & Watkeys, M. K. (2006). The Bushveld Complex. In M. R. Johnson, C. R. Anhaeusser, & R. J. Thomas (Eds.), The Geology of South Africa (pp. 261–281). South African Council for Geosciences and the Geological Society of South Africa.

Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions in Information Theory, 13 (1), 21–27.

Cramer, J. S., (2002). The origins of logistic regression. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. 2002-119/4 , pp. 16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.360300

Curry, H. B. (1944). The method of steepest descent for non-linear minimisation problems. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2 , 258–261.

Daviran, M., Parsa, M., Maghsoudi, A., & Ghezelbash, R. (2022). Quantifying uncertainties linked to the diversity of mathematical frameworks in knowledge-driven mineral prospectivity mapping. Natural Resources Research, 31 (5), 2271–2287.

Dentith, M. C., Frankcombe, K. F., & Trench, A. (1994). Geophysical signatures of Western Australian mineral deposits: an overview. Exploration Geophysics, 25 (3), 103–160.

Eales, H. V., & Cawthorn, R. G. (1996). The Bushveld Complex. In R. G. Cawthorn (Eds.), Layered Intrusions (pp. 181–229). Developments in Petrology, 15. Elsevier.

Eriksson, K. A., Turner, B. R., & Vos, R. G. (1981). Evidence of tidal processes from the lower part of the Witwatersrand Supergroup, South Africa. Sedimentary Geology, 29 , 309–325.

Eriksson, P. G., Altermann, W., & Hartzer, F. J. (2006). The Transvaal Supergroup. In M. R. Johnson, C. R. Anhaeusser, & R. J. Thomas (Eds.), The Geology of South Africa (pp. 237–260f). South African Council for Geosciences and the Geological Society of South Africa.

Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27 (8), 861–874.

Fix, E., & Hodges, J. L. (1951). An important contribution to nonparametric discriminant analysis and density estimation. International Statistical Review, 57 (3), 233–238.

Ford, A., Peters, K. J., Partington, G. A., Blevin, P. L., Downes, P. M., Fitzherbert, J. A., & Greenfield, J. E. (2019). Translating expressions of intrusion-related mineral systems into mappable spatial proxies for mineral potential mapping: Case studies from the Southern New England Orogen. Australia Ore Geology Reviews, 111 , 102943.

Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55 (1), 119–139.

Frimmel, H. E. (2005). Archaean atmospheric evolution: Evidence from the Witwatersrand gold fields, South Africa. Earth-Science Reviews, 70 , 1–46.

Frimmel, H. E. (2014). A giant Mesoarchaean crustal gold-enrichment episode: Possible causes and consequences for exploration. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication, 18 , 209–234.

Frimmel, H. E. (2018). Episodic concentration of gold to ore grade through Earth’s history. Earth-Science Reviews, 180 , 148–158.

Frimmel, H. E. (2019). The Witwatersrand basin and its gold deposits. In A. Kröner & A. Hofmann (Eds.), The Archaean geology of the Kaapvaal craton, Southern Africa (pp. 255–275). Springer.

Frimmel, H. E., & Minter, W. E. L. (2002). Recent developments concerning the geological history and genesis of the Witwatersrand gold deposits, South Africa. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication, 9 , 17–45.

Frimmel, H. E., & Nwaila, G. T. (2020). Geologic evidence of syngenetic gold in the Witwatersrand gold fields, South Africa. In R. H. Sillitoe, R. J. Goldfarb, F. Robert, & S. F. Simmons (Eds.), Geology of the world’s major gold deposits and provinces . Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication, 23. https://doi.org/10.5382/SP.23.31 .

Frost-Killian, S., Master, S., Viljoen, R. P., & Wilson, M. G. (2016). The great mineral fields of Africa introduction. Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, 39 (2), 85–103.

Geurts, P., Ernst, D., & Wehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63 , 3–42.

Gonzalez-Alvarez, I., Goncalves, M. A., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2020). Introduction to the special issue challenges for mineral exploration in the 21st century: Targeting mineral deposits under cover. Ore Geology Reviews, 126 , 103785.

Gumsley, A., Stamsnijder, J., Larsson, E., Söderlund, U., Naeraa, T., de Kock, M. O., & Ernst, R. (2018). The 2789–2782 Ma Klipriviersberg large igneous province: Implications for the chronostratigraphy of the Ventersdorp Supergroup and the timing of Witwatersrand gold deposition. In GeoCongress 2018, Geological Society of South Africa (p. 133). University of Johannesburg, South Africa, July 18–20, 2018, Proceedings.

Harris, J., Wilkinson, L., Heather, K., Fumerton, S., Bernier, M., Ayer, J., & Dahn, R. (2001). Application of GIS processing techniques for producing mineral prospectivity maps—a case study: mesothermal Au in the Swayze Greenstone Belt, Ontario. Canada. Natural Resources Research, 10 (2), 91–124.

Harris, J. R., Grunsky, E., Behnia, P., & Corrigan, D. (2015). Data-and knowledge-driven mineral prospectivity maps for Canada’s North. Ore Geology Reviews, 71 , 788–803s.

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J. H., & Friedman, J. H. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction . Springer.

Book   Google Scholar  

Hazzan, O., & Mike, K. (2023). The data science workflow in guide to teaching data science . Springer.

Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (pp. 278–282). Montréal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 .

Hüllermeier, E., & Waegeman, W. (2021). Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods. Machine learning, 110 (3), 457–506.

Humbert, F., de Kock, M., Lenhardt, N., & Altermann, W. (2019). Neoarchean to Early Proterozoic within-plate volcanism of the Kaapvaal Craton: Comparing the Ventersdorp Supergroup and the Ongeluk and Hekpoort formations (Transvaal Supergroup). In A. Kröner & A. Hofmann (Eds.), The Archaean geology of the Kaapvaal craton, Southern Africa (pp. 277–302). Springer.

Huthmann, F. M., Yudovskaya, M. A., Frei, D., & Kinnaird, J. A. (2016). Geochronological evidence for an extension of the northern lobe of the Bushveld Complex, Limpopo province, South Africa. Precambrian Research, 280 , 61–75.

James, D. E., Fouch, M. J., VanDecar, J. C., van der Lee, S., & Group, K. S. (2001). Tectospheric structure beneath southern Africa. Geophysical Research Letters, 28 (13), 2485–2488.

Joly, A., Porwal, A., McCuaig, T. C., Chudasama, B., Dentith, M. C., & Aitken, A. R. (2015). Mineral systems approach applied to GIS-based 2D-prospectivity modelling of geological regions: Insights from Western Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 71 , 673–702.

Kamo, S. L., Reimold, W. U., Krogh, T. E., & Colliston, W. P. (1996). A 2.023 Ga age for the Vredefort impact event and a report of shock metamorphosed zircons in pseudotachylitic breccias and granophyre. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 144 , 369–387.

Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic management journal, 17 (6), 441–458.

Kgaswane, E. M., Nyblade, A. A., Durrheim, R. J., Julià, J., Dirks, P. H., & Webb, S. J. (2012). Shear wave velocity structure of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa. Tectonophysics, 554 , 83–104.

Kotsiantis, S. B. (2014). Bagging and boosting variants for handling classifications problems: a survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 29 (1), 78–100.

Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 160 (1), 3–24.

Kramer, M. A. (1991). Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AIChE journal, 37 (2), 233–243.

Kruger, F. J. (1994). The Sr-isotopic stratigraphy of the western Bushveld Complex. South African Journal of Geology, 97 , 393–398.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Laudan, L. (1984). Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate . University of California Press.

Lawley, C. J., Tschirhart, V., Smith, J. W., Pehrsson, S. J., Schetselaar, E. M., Schaeffer, A. J., Houlé, M. G., & Eglington, B. M. (2021). Prospectivity modelling of Canadian magmatic Ni (±Cu±Co±PGE) sulphide mineral systems. Ore Geology Reviews, 132 , 103985.

Lawley, C. J., McCafferty, A. E., Graham, G. E., Huston, D. L., Kelley, K. D., Czarnota, K., Paradis, S., Peter, J. M., Hayward, N., Barlow, M., Emsbo, P., Coyan, J., San, J. C., & A., & Gadd, M. G. (2022). Data–driven prospectivity modelling of sediment–hosted Zn–Pb mineral systems and their critical raw materials. Ore Geology Reviews, 141 , 104635.

Ledwaba, L., Dingoko, O., Cole, P., & Havenga, M. (2009). Compilation of survey specifications for all the old regional airborne geophysical surveys conducted over South Africa. Council for Geoscience.

Lemaréchal, C. (2012). Cauchy and the gradient method. Doc Math Extra, 251 (254), 10.

Li, Q., Chen, G., & Luo, L. (2023). Mineral prospectivity mapping using attention–based convolutional neural network. Ore Geology Reviews, 156 , 105381.

Lu, M., Appel, M., & Pebesma, E. (2018). Multidimensional arrays for analysing geoscientific data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7 (8), 313.

Ma, Y., Zhao, J., Sui, Y., Liao, S., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Application of knowledge-driven methods for mineral prospectivity mapping of polymetallic sulfide deposits in the southwest Indian ridge between 46° and 52° E. Minerals, 10 (11), 970.

Márquez, A. C. (2022). The curse of dimensionality. In: Digital Maintenance Management. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering (pp. 67-86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97660-6_7.

Mihalasky, M. J., & Bonham-Carter, G. F. (2001). Lithodiversity and its spatial association with metallic mineral sites, Great Basin of Nevada. Natural Resources Research, 10 , 209–226.

Mihalasky, M. J. (1998). Mineral potential mapping of gold and silver mineralization in Nevada Great basin, a GIS Based analysis using weights of evidence. PhD thesis , University of Ottawa.

Milsom, J. (2006). Geophysical methods . Introduction to Mineral Exploration, 127.

Minter, W. E. L. (2006). The sedimentary setting of Witwatersrand placer mineral deposits in an Archean atmosphere. Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 198 , 105–119.

Mlinarić, A., Horvat, M., & Šupak Smolčić, V. (2017). Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results. Biochemia medica, 27 (3), 447–452.

Mungall, J. E., Kamo, S. L., & McQuade, S. (2016). U-Pb-geochronology documents out-of-sequence emplacement of ultramafic layers in the Bushveld Igneous Complex of South Africa. Nature Communications, 7 , 1–13.

Nguuri, T. K., Gore, J., James, D. E., Webb, S. J., Wright, C., Zengeni, T. G., Gwavava, O., Snoke, J. A., & Group, K. S. (2001). Crustal structure beneath southern Africa and its implications for the formation and evolution of the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe cratons. Geophysical Research Letters, 28 (13), 2501–2504.

Nwaila, G. T., Zhang, S. E., Bourdeau, J. E., Frimmel, H. E., & Ghorbani, Y. (2024). Spatial interpolation using machine learning: from patterns and regularities to block models. Natural Resources Research, 33 (1), 129–161.

Okada, K. (2021). A historical overview of the past three decades of mineral exploration technology. Natural Resources Research, 30 , 2839–2860.

Olugboji, T., Xue, S., & Jean-Joel Legre, Yuri Tamama,. (2024). Africa’s crustal architecture inferred from probabilistic and perturbational inversion of ambient noise: ADAMA. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems . https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC011086

Padilla, A. J., Otarod, D., Deloach-Overton, S. W., Kemna, R. F., Freeman, P. A., Wolfe, E. R., Bird, L. R., Gulley, A. L., Trippi, M. H., Dicken, C. L., Hammarstrom, J. M., & Brioche, A. S. (2021). Compilation of geospatial data (GIS) for the mineral industries and related infrastructure of Africa. U.S. Geological Survey Data Release . https://doi.org/10.5066/P97EQWXP .

Paganelli, F., Richards, J. P., & Grunsky, E. C. (2002). Integration of structural, gravity, and magnetic data using the weights of evidence method as a tool for kimberlites exploration in the Buffalo Head Hills, Northern Central Alberta. Canada Natural Resources Canada, 11 (3), 219–236.

Parsa, M., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2021). Modulating the impacts of stochastic uncertainties linked to deposit locations in data-driven predictive mapping of mineral prospectivity. Natural Resources Research, 30 , 3081–3097.

Parsa, M., Lawley, C. J. M., Cumani, R., Schetselaar, E., Harris, J., Lentz, D. R., Zhang, S. E., & Bourdeau, J. E. (2024). Predictive Modeling of Canadian Carbonatite-Hosted REE+/− Nb Deposits. Natural Resources Research . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10369-7

Partington, G. (2010). Developing models using GIS to assess geological and economic risk: An example from VMS copper gold mineral exploration in Oman. Ore Geology Reviews, 38 (3), 197–207.

Porwal, C., & Hale, M. (2003). Extended weights-of-evidence modelling for predictive mapping of base-metal deposit potential in Aravalli Province, western India. Exploration and Mining Geology, 10 (4), 155–163.

Porwal, A., Deb Das, R., Chaudhary, B., Gonzalez-Alvarez, I., & Kreuzer, O. (2015). Fuzzy inference systems for prospectivity modeling of mineral systems and a case-study for prospectivity mapping of surficial Uranium in Yeelirrie Area, Western Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 71 , 839–852.

Poujol, M., Kiefer, R., Robb, L. J., Anhaeusser, C. R., & Armstrong, R. A. (2005). New U-Pb data on zircons from the Amalia greenstone belt Southern Africa: Insights into the Neoarchaean evolution of the Kaapvaal craton. South African Journal of Geology, 108 (3), 317–332.

Rajan Girija, R., & Mayappan, S. (2019). Mapping of mineral resources and lithological units: A review of remote sensing techniques. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 10 (2), 79–106.

Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning (vol. 1). Cambridge, MIT press.

Robb, L. J., Davis, D., Kamo, S. L., & Mayer, F. M. (1992). Ages of altered granites adjoining the Witwatersrand basin with implications for the origin of gold and uranium. Nature, 357 (6380), 677–680.

Robb, L. J., & Robb, V. M. (1998). Gold in the Witwatersrand Basin. In M. G. C. Wilson & C. R. Anhaeusser (Eds.), The mineral resources of South Africa (pp. 294-349). Pretoria: Council for Geoscience.

Rosenblatt, F. (1961). Principles of neurodynamics: perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Spartan Books, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_20

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985). Learning internal representations by error propagation. Institute for Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, Ics Report, 8506 , 49.

Sabins, F. F. (1999). Remote sensing for mineral exploration. Ore Geology Reviews, 14 (3–4), 157–183.

SACS (1980). Lithostratigraphy of the Republic of South Africa, South West Africa/Namibia and the Republics of Bophuthatswana, Transkei and Venda . Geological Survey of South Africa, Handbook 8, Part 1.

Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2018). Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8 (4), e1249.

Schulte, R. F. (2024). Platinum-group metals. In Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024 . U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2024 .

Scoates, J. A., & Wall, C. J. (2015). Geochronology of layered intrusions. In B. Charlier, O. Namur, R. Latypov, & C. Tegner (Eds.), Layered Intrusions (pp. 3–74). Springer.

Seiffert, C., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Van Hulse, J., & Napolitano, A. (2010). RUSBoost: A hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance. IEEE Transactions on Systems Management and Cybernetics-Part A Systems & Humans, 40 , 185–197.

Senanayake, I. P., Kiem, A. S., Hancock, G. R., Metelka, V., Folkes, C. B., Blevin, P. L., & Budd, A. R. (2023). A spatial data-driven approach for mineral prospectivity mapping. Remote Sensing, 15 (16), 4074.

Shearer, C. (2000). The CRISP-DM model: the new blueprint for data mining. Journal of data Warehousing, 5 (4), 13–22.

Skabar, A. A. (2005). Mapping mineralization probabilities using multilayer perceptrons. Natural Resources Research, 14 , 109–123.

Solomon, M. (1994). Social empiricism. Noûs, 28 (3), 325–343.

Stettler, E. H., Fourie, C. J. S., & Cole, P. (2000). Total magnetic field intensity map of the Republic of South Africa (in 4 panels). Council for Geoscience , Pretoria.

Sun, T., Li, H., Wu, K., Chen, F., Zhu, Z., & Hu, Z. (2020). Data-driven predictive modelling of mineral prospectivity using machine learning and deep learning methods: a case study from southern Jiangxi Province. China Minerals, 10 (2), 102.

Sundararajan, N. (2012). A general perspective on geophysical methods in mineral exploration In On a Sustainable Future of the Earth’s Natural Resources . Springer.

Tikhonov, A. N. (1943). On the stability of inverse problems. In Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences, (vol. 39, pp. 195-198).

Uber Technologies Inc. (2020) H3: A hexagonal hierarchical geospatial indexing system. Retrieved on 01 March 2023 from https://github.com/uber/h3 .

Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Statistical learning theory . Wiley.

Venter, C. P., du Plessis, J. G., Stettler, R. H., Potgieter, T. D., Kleywegt, R. J., Hattingh, E., Fourie, C. J. S., Wolmarans, L. G., Cloete, A. J., & Maré, L. P. (1999). Gravity, South African Geophysical Atlas. Council for Geoscience, South Africa, 77 , 4.

Walraven, F., Armstrong, R. A., & Kruger, F. J. (1990). A chronostratigraphic framework of the northcentral Kaapvaal Craton, the Bushveld Complex and the Vredefort structure. Tectonophysics, 171 , 23–48.

Wang, J., Zuo, R., & Xiong, Y. (2020). Mapping mineral prospectivity via semi–supervised random forest. Natural Resources Research, 29 , 189–202.

Webb, S. J. (2009). The use of potential field and seismological data to analyze the structure of the lithosphere beneath southern Africa. School of Geoscience University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 377.

White-Gaynor, A. L., Nyblade, A. A., Durrheim, R., Raveloson, R., van der Meijde, M., Fadel, I., Paulssen, H., Kwadiba, M., Ntibinyane, O., Titus, N., & Sitali, M. (2020). Lithospheric boundaries and upper mantle structure beneath southern Africa imaged by P and S wave velocity models. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21 (10), e2020GC008925.

Xue, S., & Olugboji, T. (2021). UR Seismology, ACE_ADAMA. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://github.com/URseismology/ACE_ADAMA/tree/V2 .

Yin, J., & Li, N. (2022). Ensemble learning models with a Bayesian optimization algorithm for mineral prospectivity mapping. Ore Geology Reviews, 145 , 104916.

Yousefi, M., Kreuzer, O. P., Nykänen, V., & Hronsky, J. M. (2019). Exploration information systems–A proposal for the future use of GIS in mineral exploration targeting. Ore Geology Reviews, 111 , 103005.

Yousefi, M., Carranza, E. J. M., Kreuzer, O. P., Nykänen, V., Hronsky, J. M., & Mihalasky, M. J. (2021). Data analysis methods for prospectivity modelling as applied to mineral exploration targeting: State-of-the-art and outlook. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 229 , 106839.

Zeh, A., Ovtcharova, M., Wilson, A. H., & Schaltegger, U. (2015). The Bushveld Complex was emplaced and cooled in less than one million years - results of zirconology, and geotectonic implications. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 418 , 103–114.

Zhang, D., Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F. P., & Zuo, R. (2014). A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity. Mathematical Geosciences, 46 , 869–885.

Zhang, S., Carranza, E. J. M., Xiao, K., Chen, Z., Li, N., Wei, H., Xiang, J., Sun, L., & Xu, Y. (2021). Geochemically constrained prospectivity mapping aided by unsupervised cluster analysis. Natural Resources Research, 30 , 1955–1975.

Zhang, S. E., Bourdeau, J. E., Nwaila, G. T., Parsa, M., & Gorbani, Y. (2024a). Denoising of geochemical data using deep learning – implications for regional surveys. Natural Resources Research, 33 , 495–520.

Zhang, S. E., Lawley, C. J. M., Bourdeau, J. E., Nwaila, G. T., & Ghorbani, Y. (2024b). Workflow-induced uncertainty in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping. Natural Resources Research, 33 , 995–1023.

Zhou, Z., & Liu, X. (2006). Training cost-sensitive neural networks with methods addressing the class imbalance problem. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18 , 63–77.

Zuo, R. (2016). A nonlinear controlling function of geological features on magmatic–hydrothermal mineralization. Scientific Reports, 6 (1), 27127.

Zuo, R. (2020). Geodata science-based mineral prospectivity mapping: A review. Natural Resources Research, 29 (6), 3415–3424.

Zuo, R., & Wang, Z. (2020). Effects of random negative training samples on mineral prospectivity mapping. Natural Resources Research, 29 , 3443–3455.

Zuo, R., Kreuzer, O. P., Wang, J., Xiong, Y., Zhang, Z., & Wang, Z. (2021). Uncertainties in GIS-based mineral prospectivity mapping: Key types, potential impacts and possible solutions. Natural Resources Research, 30 , 3059–3079.

Zuo, R., Xiong, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, J., & Kreuzer, O. P. (2023). A new generation of artificial intelligence algorithms for mineral prospectivity mapping. Natural Resources Research, 32 (5), 1859–1869.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. George Henry (Wits Mining Institute, University of the Witwatersrand) for constructive feedback, which have improved this manuscript. We would like to acknowledge Prof. Raymond Durrheim (School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand) for his gracious assistance with data sourcing, which had improved the quality of our evidence layers. We also thank Dr. Christopher J.M. Lawley (Geological Survey of Canada) for data management ideas. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their constructive comments, which helped us improve this paper. We also thank an Associate Editor for editorial handling.

Open access funding provided by University of the Witwatersrand. No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Ave, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa

Glen T. Nwaila, Stephanie Enslin, Musa S. D. Manzi & Fenitra Andriampenomanana

Independent Researcher, 39 Kiewiet Street, Helikon Park, Randfontein, 1759, South Africa

Steven E. Zhang & Julie E. Bourdeau

Department of Geology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Emmanuel John M. Carranza

College of Health and Science, School of Natural Science, University of Lincoln, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, LN6 7DL, United Kingdom

Yousef Ghorbani

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Glen T. Nwaila contributed to conceptualization, investigation, data curation methodology, analysis and writing. Steven E. Zhang contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and writing. Julie E. Bourdeau contributed to data curation, validation, visualisation and writing. Emmanuel John M. Carranza contributed to validation and writing. Stephanie Enslin and Musa S.D. Manzi contributed to data curation, data analysis and writing. Fenitra Andriampenomanana contributed to data curation and visualisation. Yousef Ghorbani contributed to writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen T. Nwaila .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary materials. All supplementary materials are embedded in a single portable document format (PDF) file for convenience. To access individual supplementary materials, click to open each link in the PDF file. Supplementary Material 1. Datasets to support prospectivity modeling of South Africa including PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr and Witwatersrand-type Au occurrences and deposits. Supplementary Material 2. Video: Convergence to consensus of models for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr ore deposits. Supplementary Material 3. Video: Convergence to consensus of models for the Witwatersrand-type Au deposits.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 142100 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Nwaila, G.T., Zhang, S.E., Bourdeau, J.E. et al. Mineral Reconnaissance Through Scientific Consensus: First National Prospectivity Maps for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr and Witwatersrand-type Au Deposits in South Africa. Nat Resour Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10390-w

Download citation

Received : 29 May 2024

Accepted : 17 July 2024

Published : 14 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10390-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Mineral prospectivity mapping
• Exploration
• Geodata science
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research