critical thinking business case studies

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

What the Case Study Method Really Teaches

• Nitin Nohria

Seven meta-skills that stick even if the cases fade from memory.

It’s been 100 years since Harvard Business School began using the case study method. Beyond teaching specific subject matter, the case study method excels in instilling meta-skills in students. This article explains the importance of seven such skills: preparation, discernment, bias recognition, judgement, collaboration, curiosity, and self-confidence.

During my decade as dean of Harvard Business School, I spent hundreds of hours talking with our alumni. To enliven these conversations, I relied on a favorite question: “What was the most important thing you learned from your time in our MBA program?”

• Nitin Nohria is the George F. Baker Jr. and Distinguished Service University Professor. He served as the 10th dean of Harvard Business School, from 2010 to 2020.

Partner Center

Course details

Critical thinking for business.

You can enrol on this one-day course individually, or as part of our  Business and Managements Skills discount week 17 - 22 June .  It is also available online .

You are deploying critical thinking when you use information, experience, observation and reasoning to guide your decisions, actions and beliefs.

Improved analytical competency and emotional intelligence are just two of the by-products of critical thinking. 

Critical thinking combines reflection with knowledge to evaluate and resolve challenges before they become problems. 

Even unexpected problems can be resolved optimally via a critical-thinking approach.  As such, the critical thinking habit is an essential component of successful business. 

An organisation whose members think critically is one which will benefit from improved decision-making capacities whilst avoiding costly mistakes.

Programme details

This course adopts the following intensive structure to make the most of your valuable time. 

Case Studies: Critical Thinking in Business

We present a number of real-life case studies in which critical thinking has led to effective business outcomes.

• Intellectual Property
• Music Royalties
• Market Acquisition

The Criticality Trajectory

We explore best practice in critical thinking via an exploration of our Criticality Trajectory (depicted below).

You will first be taken through three research-backed models of assessing critical thinking:

• The RED (Recognise assumptions, Evaluate arguments, Draw conclusions) model from Pearson's Watson-Glaser II Critical Thinking Appraisal
• Halpern’s Critical Thinking Assessment, and
• Bloom’s Taxonomy.

These will serve as background knowledge during a practical activity in which you will learn how to undertake a critical thinking audit, and appraise some common indicators of a deficit in critical thinking:

• An absence of business strategy
• Rapid changes in business strategy
• Intra-team conflicts

These indicators will be considered alongside signs of a sufficiency of critical thinking, such as work being completed on time and to an appropriate standard.

You will then be guided through the five key steps involved in an organisation audit of critical thiking.

• Assess a Business Product This can be virtually anything concrete such as a physical product, a report, or a debrief on an individual or team task.
• Ask all stakeholders and participants to describe the requirement to the auditor. This should ideally be done on both an individual and group basis. 
• Invite honest judgements on the effectiveness of the product
• Invite honest assessments of the implications of the work
• Competencies to Assess
• Observation
• Problem solving
• Team cohesion
• Communication
• Open mindedness
• Tolerance for ambiguity
• Time efficiency
• Retroduction/ abductive reasoning

Accessing your course 

Further details will be emailed to you two weeks ahead of your course, this will include registration information and an overview of the course timetable.

Please get in touch if you have not received this information within five working days of the course start date. 

In the meantime, you may wish to plan your travel:  Travel information

Digital Certification

In order to be eligible for a certificate of attendance, you will need to attend the whole course. Participants who meet this criteria will contacted by email after the end of the course with instructions on how to download their University of Oxford digital certificate.

The certificate will show your name, the course title and the dates of the course you attended. You will be able to download your certificate, or share it on social media if you choose to do so.

This course can be taken separately or as  part of a weekly discount fee package (17 - 22 June).

Week 1 of our  business and management skills programme (10 - 15 june 2024)  is also available with a discount.  .

All courses are VAT exempt.

Register immediately online 

Click the “book now” button on this webpage. Payment by credit or debit card is required.

Request an invoice

If you require an invoice for your company or personal records, please contact us. The Course Administrator will then email you an invoice. Payment is accepted online by credit/debit card, or by bank transfer. Please do not send card or bank details by email.

Oxford Oracle Ltd

Oxford oracle.

Oxford Oracle is a global firm headquartered in Oxford.  Its consultancy activities focus on Business Strategy, Innovation, R&D, Higher Education and Entrepreneurship.  The Oracle's primary driver is to engage in truly useful innovation whilst forging lasting partnerships.

Application

If you would like to discuss your application or any part of the application process before applying, please click Contact Us at the top of this page.

Accommodation

Although not included in the course fee, accommodation may be available at our on-site  Rewley House Residential Centre . All bedrooms are en suite and decorated to a high standard, and come with tea- and coffee-making facilities, free Wi-Fi access and Freeview TV. Guests can take advantage of the excellent dining facilities and common room bar, where they may relax and network with others on the programme.

To check prices, availability and to book rooms please visit the  Rewley House Residential Centre  website. 

Terms & conditions for applicants and students

Information on financial support

Sign up for course news

Ideas and insights from Harvard Business Publishing Corporate Learning

To Improve Critical Thinking, Don’t Fall into the Urgency Trap

Too often at work, people rely on expertise and past experiences to jump to a conclusion. Yet research consistently shows that when we rush decisions, we often regret them—even if they end up being correct. [i]

Why we hasten decision making is quite clear. We’re inundated with incessant distractions that compete for our attention, and, at the same time, we’re facing profound pressure to go faster and drive our businesses forward, even when the path ahead is unclear.

In the aftermath of information overwhelm, evolving technology, and rapidly changing business environments, people often unconsciously fall into a pernicious paradox called the “urgency trap.”

The Urgency Trap

The urgency trap, which can be defined as the habitual, unbridled, and counterproductive tendencies to rush through decision making when under the pressure of too many demands, is a paradox because it limits the very thing that could help us be more innovative, efficient, and effective: Our critical thinking.

The ability to analyze and effectively break down an issue to make a decision or solve a problem in novel ways is sorely lacking in today’s workforce, with most employers reporting that their employees’ critical thinking skills are average at best. [ii]

The good news? Critical thinking is a teachable skill, and one that any person can learn to make time for when making decisions. To improve and devote time for critical thinking at work, consider the following best practices.

1. Question assumptions and biases

Consider this common scenario: A team is discussing a decision that they must make quickly. The team’s options—and the arguments for and against them—have been assembled, but no clear evidence supports a particular course of action. Under pressure to move fast, the team relies on their expertise and past experiences to rapidly provide a solution. Yet, in the months following their decision, the issues that prompted the original discussion persist, and the team wonders why.

The issue here may be that the team failed to question their own assumptions and biases. Indeed, when we view situations solely based on our own personal experiences and beliefs, we limit our options and provide solutions that are often short-sighted or superficial. [iii] To improve critical thinking skills, we must step back and ask ourselves,

• “Am I seeking out information that confirms my pre-conceived idea?”
• “Am I perceiving a past experience as more predictable than it actually was?”
• “Am I overemphasizing information that comes to mind quickly, instead of calculating other probabilities?”

2. Reason through logic

When presented with an argument, it is important to analyze it logically in order to determine whether or not it is valid. This means looking at the evidence that is being used to support the argument and determining whether or not it actually does support the conclusion that is being drawn.

Additionally, consider the source of the information. Is it credible? Trustworthy? Finally, be aware of common logical fallacies people tend to use when trying to speed up decision making, such as false dilemma (erroneously limiting available options) and hasty generalizations (making a claim based on a few examples rather than substantial proof).

3. Listen actively and openly

When we’re in a rush to make a decision, we often focus more on how we want to respond rather than what the speaker is saying. Active listening, on the other hand, is a critical thinking skill that involves paying close attention to what someone else is saying with the intent to learn, and then asking questions to clarify and deepen understanding.

When engaging in active listening, it’s important to avoid interrupting and instead allow the other person to fully express their thoughts. Additionally, resist the urge to judge or criticize what the other person is saying. Rather, focus on truly understanding their perspective. This may mean practicing open-mindedness by considering new ideas, even if they challenge existing beliefs. By keeping an open mind, this ensures that all sides of an issue are considered before coming to a conclusion.

4. Ask better questions

In an article for Harvard Business Review, John Coleman, author of the HBR Guide to Crafting Your Purpose , writes, “At the heart of critical thinking is the ability to formulate deep, different, and effective questions.” [iv]

To ask better questions, first consider the audience for the question (who is hearing the question and who might respond?) and the purpose (what is the goal of asking this question?). Then, approach queries with rigor and curiosity by asking questions that:

• Are open-ended yet short and direct (e.g., “How might you help me think about this differently?”)
• Challenge a group’s conventional thinking (e.g., “What if we tried a new approach?”)
• Help others reconsider their first principles or hypotheses (e.g., “As we look at the data, how might we reconsider our initial proposed solution?”)
• Encourage further discussion and analysis (e.g., “How can we deepen our understanding of this issue?”)
• Thoughtfully follow up on the solution (e.g., “How do we feel about the progress so far?”)

5. Create space for deliberation

The recommendations outlined thus far are behaviors and capabilities people can use in the moment, but sometimes, the best solutions are formulated after consideration. In fact, research shows that a deliberate process often leads to better conclusions. [v] And sleep has even been proven to help the brain assimilate a problem and see it more clearly. [vi]

When issues are complex, it’s important to find ways to resist unnecessary urgency. Start by mapping out a process that allows several days or longer to sit with a problem. Then, create space in the day to formulate in quiet reflection, whether that’s replacing your first thirty minutes in the morning with thinking instead of checking email, or going on a walk midday, or simply journaling for a few moments before bed.

Critical Thinking Cannot Be Overlooked

In the face of rapidly-evolving business environments, the ability to make smart decisions quickly is one of a company’s greatest assets—but to move fast, people must first slow down to reason through pressing issues, ask thoughtful questions, and evaluate a topic from multiple angles.

To learn more about how organizations can enhance their critical thinking and decision-making skills, download the full paper: Who Is Really Making the Decisions in Your Organization — and How?

[i] Grant Halvorson, Heidi, “Quick Decisions Create Regret, Even When They Are Good Decisions,” Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/1758386/quick-decisions-create-regret-even-when-they-are-good-decisions .

[ii] Plummer, Matt, “A Short Guide to Building Your Team’s Critical Thinking Skills,” Harvard Business Review, October 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/10/a-short-guide-to-building-your-teams-critical-thinking-skills .

[iii] Benjamin Enke, Uri Gneezy, Brian Hall, David Martin, Vadim Nelidov, Theo Offerman, and Jeroen van de Ve, “Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?” Harvard Business School, 2021. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/21-102_1ed838f2-8ef3-4eec-b543-d00eb1efbe10.pdf

[iv] Coleman, John, “Critical Thinking Is About Asking Better Questions,” Harvard Business Review, April 2022. https://hbr.org/2022/04/critical-thinking-is-about-asking-better-questions .

[v] Markovitz, Daniel, “How to Avoid Rushing to Solutions When Problem-Solving,” Harvard Business Review, November 2020. https://hbr.org/2020/11/how-to-avoid-rushing-to-solutions-when-problem-solving .

[vi] Miller, Jared, “Does ‘Sleeping On It’ Really Work?” WebMD. https://www.webmd.com/sleep-disorders/features/does-sleeping-on-it-really-work .

Let’s talk

Change isn’t easy, but we can help. Together we’ll create informed and inspired leaders ready to shape the future of your business.

© 2024 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights reserved. Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School.

• Privacy Policy
• Copyright Information
• Terms of Use
• About Harvard Business Publishing
• Higher Education
• Harvard Business Review
• Harvard Business School

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .

Cookie and Privacy Settings

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Problem-Solving in Business: CASE STUDIES

• ABOUT THIS LIBGUIDE
• PROBLEM-SOLVING DEFINED AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT
• SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS NEEDED IN PROBLEM-SOLVING
• PROBLEM-SOLVING STEPS
• CASE STUDIES
• MORE HELPFUL RESOURCES

• << Previous: PROBLEM-SOLVING STEPS
• Next: MORE HELPFUL RESOURCES >>
• Last Updated: Mar 23, 2024 4:47 PM
• URL: https://libguides.nypl.org/problem_solving_in_business

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Case Studies in Management and Marketing: Critical Thinking, Public Relations and Integrated Business Topics

Related Papers

Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS)

SAGE Research Methods Foundations [online]

Mark N K Saunders , Bill Lee

Despite having a relatively recent history compared to other social sciences, the business and management field has proliferated into a number of largely independent disciplines. These include: accounting; corporate governance; entrepreneurship; finance; human resource management; international business and international management; leadership; management and business history; marketing and retail; operations and logistics; organizational behaviour; public management and governance; and strategy. Each of these disciplines has its own methodological predilections and as a corollary, a view of what constitutes a case study, where case studies should feature in a research project and the relative usefulness of case study research. Given this breadth of disciplines, only a provisional definition of a case study will be provided at this point; namely, a case study is research into a phenomenon, organization, process, or event that is studied as a unit of analysis that is interesting in its own right. Rather than attempting to summarise all that has been written about case studies across the management disciplines, this entry will elaborate upon thinking around this definition using the metaphor of a kaleidoscope.

Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki

Vesna Damnjanovic

Journal of Business Case Studies

James Maxwell

Industrial Marketing Management

Adam Lindgreen

Refereed Program of the E-Leader Conference at …

Serbian Journal of Management

Milovan Vuković

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

An Examination of Case Studies in Management Research: A Paradigmatic Bridge

Mehedi Masud

Robert Klonoski

Ricardo D'Ávila

American Journal of Business Education (AJBE)

María Cordente Rodríguez

Ali Haj Aghapour

Agribusiness

Randall Westgren

Marketing Education Review

Lewis Hershey

Adrian Carr

Aaron Walter

Farai Chigora

Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management

The Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Sri Lanka

rohitha rosairo

mark tadajewski

Sreeramana Aithal

International Journal Of Management And Economics Invention

matthias nkuda

Raymond Obeng

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

ansar waseem

Marlisa Abdul Rahim

Arch Woodside

Peter Rule , vaughn M john

Diego Alvarez Villacis

mark tadajewski , Janice Denegri-Knott

Melina Ocampo González

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

New user? Create an account

Forgot your password?

Forgot your username?

Advertisement

Use Case Studies Online to Facilitate Critical Thinking Skills

Join or login to save this to your library

Contributor

Bill Brandon

Editor, Learning Solutions, The Learning Guild

The human-machine division of labor is changing rapidly. It will come as a surprise to nobody that the pandemic slowed the growth of automation and modified expectations of the amount of change to that ratio in the next few years. This article suggests that the case study method, one of many experiential approaches to learning, can facilitate the development of essential cognitive skills, particularly in a remote learning setting. 

Responding to disruption 

According to survey responses collected by the World Economic Forum ( “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” ), in 2020 respondents expected 47% of business tasks would be automated in the following five years.  However, today machines just manage to perform 34% of all business-related tasks. This represents only a 1% increase in the level of automation since the 2020 edition of the Future of Jobs Survey. The expectations in the Future of Jobs Report 2023 are that 42% of business tasks will be automated by 2027. In some organizations the percentage will be much greater than that, but overall the improvement is falling short of expectations. 

Supporting those lowered expectations will still require accommodation in the learning and development (L&D) plans of enterprise and government organizations. On top of that, automation will continue to grow and human performance skills required for employment—including thinking skills—will increase substantially as actual jobs change. This shift will very likely show up in gaps in skill sets that employers who responded to the Future of Jobs survey in 2023 said they expect employees to have. Some skills will turn out to be best turned over to machines by 2027, while other skills for which people are better suited will remain at their current levels or progress more slowly. In addition, we can expect to discover new skill requirements for humans. These new skills will include, for example, the ability to work effectively with artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The net result is the disruption of many jobs, including changes to methods of skilling, upskilling, and reskilling, along with the plans of L&D organizations to support skill development at scale. 

Fortunately, learning design professionals and academic institutions have innovated methods and modalities in recent years to meet this challenge.  It is important to consider how to apply these innovations to meet the skill gaps in the best time possible.

Case studies are not the only approach that instructional designers can apply to this kind of development. My intention in coming months is to explore other opportunities such as virtual reality, games, simulations, microlearning, and web-based interactive computing platforms among many others. 

Skill set evolution 2023 to 2027 

According to The Future of Jobs Report 2023, analytical thinking and creative thinking are the most important skills for workers, beginning in 2023 as organizations evolve over the next five years. Analytical thinking is considered a core skill by more companies than any other skill. Creative thinking ranks second.  

Cognitive skills, the category that includes analytical thinking and creative thinking, are growing in importance more quickly than other kinds of skills. The increasing importance of problem-solving ability drives this. According to the World Economic Forum 2023 survey, creative thinking is growing in importance a bit more rapidly than analytical thinking. Notwithstanding that difference, analytical thinking is expected to account for 10% of training initiatives across all the responses to the survey, making it the higher priority of the two skill sets from 2023 to 2027. Creative thinking accounts for 8% of upskilling activity in that period, making it the second workforce development priority.  How can changes to the default approaches to teaching and learning have a positive improvement on solving this challenge?

Learning by doing

Didactic teaching and experiential teaching are two different approaches to teaching and learning. Didactic teaching is familiar to many people due to its extensive use in primary and secondary education. It is also the default that organizational leaders and decision-makers may expect, accept, and sometimes insist upon for teaching and learning. Didactic teaching is primarily lecture-based and assumes that learning is the product of teachers imparting knowledge to students.

Experiential learning takes the approach that people learn best through hands-on experiences. Experiential learning encourages learners to take an active role in their own learning process. As a way to build cognitive skills, experiential learning works, and the didactic approach is far less effective, if it works at all. Adopting the experiential model requires moving away from didactic teaching, but we can expect resistance to the change from organizational leadership, legislative bodies, and from learners themselves.

Cognitive skills grow with experience and maturity, and they can be sharpened through appropriate adoption of improved teaching and learning methods, mental exercises, and feedback. There are experiential methods that provide situational simulations of sufficient fidelity to support learning a skill safely, to provide necessary competence, and to give the learners the opportunity to practice the necessary analysis and performance. One of those methods is the Harvard Case Study Method, more simply referred to as the case study method. 

Introduction to the case study method 

Most readers are probably familiar with the way that case study exercises are conducted in classroom settings. There are links to some resources at the end of this article for readers who need them.

The instructor’s job for this method begins with inviting participants to online sessions for case study exercise. The instructor is also responsible for providing the case materials to participants in their respective locations, making sure that all of the participants are able to connect to the events, and organizing the total group into subgroups to facilitate the sessions. The details of these duties will depend on the online meeting software selected for use. 

The case study method uses narratives or stories (cases) that put the learners in a role requiring them to make a decision. Each case requires learners to consume a case narrative and some supporting information to discuss the case with other learners in their subgroup, to identify and analyze the problem in the case, to develop recommendations to address the issues, and to discuss the recommendations with other learners in the larger group. There may be ambiguity in the information provided to the learners. The decisions will involve a certain amount of difficulty. These are not obstacles to learning: the objective is to improve the learners' approach to collaborative problem solving and development of consensus skills. The objective is not to create conformance to canonical dictates.

Unlike other teaching methods, instructors must not reveal their opinions about the case, its analysis, or the recommendation. The instructor’s job is to ask students to devise, describe, and defend solutions to the problems presented by the case. The case study and instructions may be written to meet the requirements of the instructional situation as to details such as organizing the group into small groups, and the amount of time permitted for discussion. 

The case method asks learners to work together as quickly as they can to make sense of a complex problem, to arrive at a reasonable solution, and to communicate that solution in an effective way.  

Case materials  

Case materials provide learners with the information needed by the students to support learning. Participants in the session will need a copy of the case information (“the case”). You can purchase the information in booklet form by choosing a relevant case from any of the publishers listed in the next section of this article. 

You can also create a case based on your own curated clippings from business publications. As required by your organization’s policies, have your legal department review the clippings and your created case study based on them.  

As the facilitator, you are required to provide each learner with the case materials.  

Published case materials  

A number of organizations publish case materials. These organizations include: 

• Blavatnik School of Government  
• Harvard Business School  
• Stanford Graduate School of Business  
• Columbia Business School  

Here are resources for further reading on case study methods and critical thinking. 

• Ellet, W. (2007). The Case Study Handbook: How to Read, Discuss, and Write Persuasively About Cases . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Link  
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching , 42(5), 62-66. Link
• Nohria, Nitin. (2021) “What the case study method really teaches.” Harvard Business Review. December 21, 2021.  Link  
• Rebeiz, Karim S. (2011) “An Insider Perspective on Implementing the Harvard Case Study Method in Business Teaching.” Retrieved September 4, 2032 at ED527670.pdf  

At the time of this writing, none of those resources was behind a paywall.

September 7, 2023

Accessible & Inclusive Learning: A Panel Discussion

Online Events Archive

Trends in Instructional Technologies over the Past 15 Years

Revitalizing learning: merging timeless design principles with cutting-edge learning environments, get them to yes: tools and tactics to get what you need from stakeholders, instructional design in the real world.

Critical Thinking Case

Walmart gets serious about e-commerce.

As the world’s largest retailer, Walmart has built thousands of brick-and-mortar stores in the United States, Mexico, and elsewhere. Although a success story when it comes to traditional retail locations, Walmart has struggled with its e-commerce efforts, with recent online sales accounting for about 3 percent of the company’s $300 billion in annual sales. The company has tried several different e-commerce strategies in the past, but none of them was an overwhelming success. Some company insiders objected to the pricing strategy used for online purchases; they were fearful that Walmart’s lower prices online would take customers (and sales) away from the retail locations.

Doug McMillon, Walmart’s CEO since 2014, believed a significant change was needed in the company’s e-commerce business, and he recently made changes in a big way. Over the past two years, Walmart spent billions to acquire several online companies to expand its e-commerce business in an effort to take a small bite out of retail giant Amazon’s success. In 2016, Walmart purchased Jet.com, an e-commerce site that sells a little bit of everything (books, clothing, electronics, etc.) at discount prices. Once the $3 billion acquisition was completed, Jet’s cofounder and CEO, Marc Lore, who now runs Walmart’s e-commerce platform, worked with McMillon to identify other established online companies to add to their e-commerce portfolio, and add they did.

First Walmart purchased footwear e-tailer ShoeBuy for $70 million in January 2017. The following month, Walmart bought outdoor specialty retailer Moosejaw for $51 million. Then in March, Walmart paid $75 million for ModCloth, an eclectic shopping site for women’s fashions. Walmart is also said to be in negotiations to buy Bonobos, a hip fashion retailer geared to millennial males.

Reaction to the acquisitions has been mixed, depending on whom you ask. Retail analysts applaud the company’s radical move, pointing out that several well-known traditional retailers have closed their doors or filed bankruptcy because they failed to take part in the e-commerce revolution. Fashionistas, on the other hand, are lukewarm about the move. However, McMillon’s decision to allow the online retailers to operate independently may help retain loyal customers. The new e-commerce strategy may also lure typical in-store shoppers to take advantage of the expanded offerings available through both Walmart.com and Jet.com.

• What are some advantages of Walmart purchasing established web businesses?
• What impact is Walmart’s acquisition of nontraditional retailers likely to have on the shopping habits of Walmart’s customers?
• How will the aggressive e-commerce plan implemented by Walmart affect operations at its retail locations?

Sources: Brad Stone and Matthew Boyle, “Amazon Won’t Know What Hit ’Em!” Bloomberg Businessweek, http://www.bloomberg.com, May 8–May 14, 2017; “What an Acquisition of Bonobos Would Signal About Wal-Mart’s Strategy,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com, May 9, 2017; “Walmart Acquires Niche Online Retailers, to the Dismay of Hipsters,” Denver Post, http://www.denverpost.com, March 24, 2017; Alana Abramson, “Walmart Acquires Online Women’s Retailer ModCloth,” Fortune, http://fortune.com, March 17, 2017; Phil Wahba, “Walmart’s 29% Online Holiday Season Growth Sends Shares Jumping,” Fortune, http://fortune.com, February 21, 2017; Laura Heller, “Take That Amazon: Walmart Buys Moosejaw for $51 Million,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com, February 15, 2017; “Walmart Acquires ShoeBuy for $70 Million,” Business Insider, http://www.businessinsider.com, January 6, 2017.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.

Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-business/pages/1-introduction

• Authors: Lawrence J. Gitman, Carl McDaniel, Amit Shah, Monique Reece, Linda Koffel, Bethann Talsma, James C. Hyatt
• Publisher/website: OpenStax
• Book title: Introduction to Business
• Publication date: Sep 19, 2018
• Location: Houston, Texas
• Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/introduction-business/pages/1-introduction
• Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/introduction-business/pages/1-critical-thinking-case

© Apr 5, 2023 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.

• What’s New

In today’s rapidly changing business landscape, critical thinking has become an invaluable skill for entrepreneurs and professionals alike. The ability to analyze information, evaluate ideas, and make informed decisions has a direct impact on the success and growth of a business. Using real-life case studies, this article explores the importance of critical thinking in business and its various applications.

Understanding Critical Thinking

Before diving into the case studies, let’s first define what critical thinking truly means. Critical thinking goes beyond simply accepting information at face value. It involves questioning assumptions, examining evidence, and considering different perspectives to arrive at well-reasoned conclusions.

Developing critical thinking skills is crucial in various aspects of life, from academia to the workplace. It is a skill that can be honed through practice and continuous learning. By fostering critical thinking abilities, individuals can enhance their problem-solving skills and make more informed decisions.

Defining Critical Thinking

When it comes to critical thinking, it is essential to understand that it is not synonymous with being critical or negative. Instead, it refers to the ability to objectively analyze and evaluate information. Critical thinkers are open-minded and willing to entertain different ideas, even those that challenge their own beliefs.

Furthermore, critical thinking involves being able to recognize and avoid logical fallacies. By identifying flawed reasoning, individuals can strengthen their arguments and make more compelling cases for their viewpoints.

The Role of Critical Thinking in Decision Making

One of the key areas where critical thinking shines is in decision making. In business, decisions can have significant consequences, and making the wrong choice can lead to missed opportunities or even failure. Critical thinking provides a framework for making informed decisions by considering all available information, weighing the pros and cons, and anticipating potential outcomes.

Moreover, critical thinking fosters creativity and innovation in problem-solving. By approaching challenges with a critical mindset, individuals can uncover unique solutions and think outside the box to address complex issues effectively.

The Impact of Critical Thinking on Business Success

Now that we have established the value of critical thinking, let’s explore how it directly impacts business success.

When it comes to the realm of business, critical thinking plays a pivotal role in shaping the decision-making process and overall success of an organization. Beyond just problem-solving, critical thinking is a multifaceted skill that enables individuals to analyze situations from various perspectives, consider potential consequences, and make informed choices. This level of cognitive agility is essential in navigating the complex and ever-evolving landscape of the business world.

Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills

Businesses face numerous challenges and obstacles on a daily basis. Critical thinking equips individuals with problem-solving skills that enable them to identify the root causes of issues, generate creative solutions, and implement effective strategies. By encouraging critical thinking within an organization, businesses can overcome hurdles and achieve their goals more efficiently.

Moreover, the ability to think critically not only helps in resolving immediate issues but also in anticipating and preventing future problems. By fostering a culture that values critical thinking, businesses can proactively address potential pitfalls and stay ahead of the curve in an increasingly competitive market.

Boosting Creativity and Innovation

Businesses that promote critical thinking also foster a culture of innovation and creativity. Critical thinkers are not confined by traditional norms or limited by existing solutions. They challenge the status quo and continually seek out ways to improve processes, products, and services. This mindset encourages creativity, leading to groundbreaking ideas and a competitive edge in the market.

Furthermore, critical thinking serves as a catalyst for innovation by encouraging employees to question assumptions, explore unconventional approaches, and embrace change. In an era where adaptability and originality are key drivers of success, businesses that prioritize critical thinking are better positioned to thrive amidst disruption and drive continuous growth.

The Connection Between Critical Thinking and Business Strategy

Successful businesses understand that critical thinking is not limited to individual decision making but plays a pivotal role in shaping the overall business strategy.

When it comes to the intricate dance between critical thinking and business strategy, one cannot underestimate the importance of fostering a culture that values analytical thinking and problem-solving skills. Organizations that prioritize critical thinking empower their employees to think outside the box, challenge the status quo, and innovate in ways that drive business growth and success.

Strategic Planning and Critical Thinking

Strategic planning involves analyzing market trends, assessing strengths and weaknesses, and identifying opportunities and threats. Critical thinking is essential in this process, as it allows businesses to objectively evaluate their current position and make data-driven decisions. Key stakeholders can challenge assumptions, spot gaps in the market, and develop strategies that align with the organization’s goals and objectives.

Moreover, critical thinking in strategic planning extends beyond just the internal workings of a company. It also involves considering external factors such as political, economic, social, and technological trends that could impact the business landscape. By incorporating a holistic approach to critical thinking in strategic planning, businesses can adapt proactively to changes in the market and stay ahead of the competition.

Risk Management and Critical Thinking

Every business venture involves some degree of risk. Critical thinking enables businesses to evaluate potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate them effectively. By carefully examining the various factors that contribute to risk, critical thinkers can make informed decisions that maximize potential rewards while minimizing potential setbacks.

Furthermore, critical thinking in risk management goes hand in hand with scenario planning. By envisioning different scenarios and assessing their likelihood and potential impact, businesses can prepare contingency plans that allow them to navigate unforeseen challenges with agility and resilience. This proactive approach to risk management, driven by critical thinking, equips businesses to weather storms and emerge stronger on the other side.

Developing Critical Thinking Skills in the Workplace

As critical thinking emerges as a crucial skill in the business world, organizations are investing in programs to develop and nurture this ability among employees.

In today’s rapidly changing business landscape, the ability to think critically is more valuable than ever. Critical thinking enables employees to analyze complex situations, identify underlying issues, and develop innovative solutions. By honing these skills, individuals can navigate uncertainty with confidence and adapt to new challenges effectively.

Training Programs for Critical Thinking

Organizations can implement training programs that focus on enhancing critical thinking skills. These programs provide employees with the tools and techniques necessary to evaluate information objectively, think critically, and make sound decisions. By investing in such training, businesses lay a foundation for a workforce that is equipped to tackle complex problems and drive innovation.

Furthermore, these training programs often incorporate real-world case studies and simulations to immerse employees in practical scenarios that require critical thinking. Through hands-on experience, participants can apply their newfound skills in a safe environment, gaining confidence in their ability to analyze situations and make informed decisions.

Fostering a Culture of Critical Thinking

Creating a culture that values and rewards critical thinking is vital for its widespread adoption within an organization. By encouraging employees to question assumptions, challenge the status quo, and contribute new ideas, businesses can tap into the collective intelligence of their workforce. This inclusive approach fosters collaboration, encourages diverse perspectives, and ultimately leads to better decision making and problem solving.

Moreover, fostering a culture of critical thinking requires leadership commitment and alignment with organizational values. When leaders model critical thinking behaviors and actively solicit input from employees at all levels, it sets a precedent for a culture that prioritizes thoughtful analysis and continuous improvement. By embedding critical thinking into the fabric of the organization, businesses can cultivate a competitive advantage driven by innovation and strategic decision-making.

The Future of Critical Thinking in Business

As we look ahead, it is evident that the role of critical thinking in business will continue to evolve.

In today’s rapidly changing business landscape, critical thinking has become more crucial than ever. With the rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning, businesses are inundated with data and information. While technology can provide vast amounts of data, critical thinkers must now possess the skills to analyze, interpret, and make informed decisions based on this wealth of information. The ability to distinguish between valuable insights and irrelevant noise will be a defining factor for successful businesses in the future.

The Role of Technology in Critical Thinking

Advancements in technology offer both opportunities and challenges when it comes to critical thinking. While technology can provide vast amounts of data and information, critical thinkers must navigate through the noise and filter out what is relevant and reliable. Additionally, as automation becomes more prevalent, critical thinking will be essential in identifying new areas where human ingenuity and problem-solving skills are necessary.

Furthermore, the integration of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies into business operations will require critical thinkers to adapt and leverage these tools effectively. These immersive technologies have the potential to revolutionize how businesses analyze data, collaborate on projects, and engage with customers. Critical thinking will be instrumental in maximizing the benefits of these technological advancements while mitigating potential risks and ethical considerations.

The Long-Term Benefits of Critical Thinking in Business

The long-term benefits of critical thinking in business are clear. Businesses that cultivate a culture of critical thinking, where employees feel encouraged to question assumptions and explore new possibilities, will be better equipped to adapt to change and thrive in an uncertain future. The ability to think critically will not only drive business success but also empower individuals to become lifelong learners and confident decision-makers in every aspect of their lives.

Moreover, critical thinking fosters innovation and creativity within organizations. By challenging conventional wisdom and fostering a culture of intellectual curiosity, businesses can stay ahead of the competition and drive continuous improvement. Embracing diverse perspectives and encouraging constructive debate will lead to more robust strategies and solutions that address complex challenges effectively.

In Conclusion

Through the lens of case studies, we have explored the importance of critical thinking in business. From decision making and problem solving to strategic planning and innovation, critical thinking plays a fundamental role in driving business success. By investing in training programs and fostering a culture that values critical thinking, businesses can position themselves for long-term growth and adaptability in an ever-changing world.

Expand Your Knowledge:

Dive deeper into our insights and explore how we are transforming education and industry collaboration. Check out these related reads:

• The Importance of Critical Thinking in Decision Making
• The Importance of Critical Thinking and Analysis
• The Importance of Critical Thinking for Students
• The Importance of Critical Thinking in the Workplace
• The Importance of Critical Thinking in the Classroom
• The Importance of Critical Thinking in Education

Ready to transform your critical thinking into actionable skills that will set you apart in the business world?

Join Ewance today and embrace the power of challenge-based learning. Our platform is designed to take you beyond the classroom, providing real-world industry challenges that foster collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking. Whether you’re a high school student or a postgraduate, Ewance is your gateway to a dynamic education that bridges theory with practical application. Register for free and start your journey towards becoming a future leader in innovation and strategic problem-solving.

Elevate Your Knowledge Journey

• For Educators
• For Industry
• For Students
• Success Stories
• Wall of Love
• Knowledge Base
• Affiliate Partners
• Opportunities

You have no items in your shopping cart.

• Accounting & Control
• Business & Government
• Case Method
• Decision Analysis
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Leadership & Organizational Behavior
• Management Communications
• Operations Management
• Darden Course Pack
• Forio Simulation
• Multimedia Case
• Technical Note
• Video Playlist

Share This Product

A course on critical thinking and written communication: the wac model.

Product Overview

This technical note presents the pedagogic approach to teaching and sharpening critical thinking and written communication used at the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IIMA) in the Written Analysis and Communication (WAC) course and provides a conceptual model for the course. Examining both the importance of these objectives and the challenges associated with building these skills, the note gives a detailed exposition of the way the course is structured and delivered as well as the assumptions underlying the approach. A model is built on these to demonstrate the interlinkages between the dominant programme-wide use of case methodology, and other elements such as the students’ backgrounds and the design and delivery of the course rather than as a standalone unit or a one-shot way of serving its objectives. The note also presents recommendations on how the model may be adopted by institutions striving to develop critical thinking and written communication in their MBA students.

Learning Objectives

The note provides a conceptual model for the WAC course as well as recommendations on how the model may be adopted by institutions striving to develop critical thinking and written communication in their MBA students.

• Add to Cart
• Save to Library

• Testimonial
• Web Stories

Learning Home

Not Now! Will rate later

MBA Case Studies - Solved Examples

Need of MBA Case Studies

Case i: chemco case.

• ChemCo is a quality leader in the U.K. car batteries market.
• Customer battery purchases in the automobile market are highly seasonal.
• The fork-lift business was added to utilize idle capacity during periods of inactivity.
• This is a low-growth industry (1% annual growth over the last two years)
• Large customers are sophisticated and buy based on price and quality. Smaller customers buy solely on price.
• There is a Spanish competitor in the market who offers low priced batteries of inferior quality.

Essential MBA GD Guide: Key Topics with Strategies Free

• Importance of Group Discussions
• Tips and Strategies to handle a GD
• Top 25 GD topics
• Free Download
• Established player in car batteries
• Losing heavily in fork-lift truck batteries
• Old fashioned owner resistance to change
• Low priced competitors
• Foreign competitors gaining market share
• Decisive Interview, GD & Essay prep
• GD: Topics 2021
• GD: Approach
• GD: Do's and Don'ts
• GD: Communications
• Solved GDs Topics

GD Introduction

• Types of GD topics: Techniques
• GD: Ettiquette
• GD: Content
• Solved Case Studies
• High quality product, but low end customers care more about price than quality
• Mismanaged product diversification in a price sensitive market
• Alternative 1: Establish an Off-Brand for the fork-lift business
• Alternative 2: Educate the customer market about product quality
• Alternative 3: Exit the fork-lift battery business
• Establishing the firm's quality image
• Increase in market share
• Increase in sales
• Cost of the product
• Protect firm's quality image in the automobile industry
• Redesigned product to reduce the cost of manufacture
• Low price to enable it to compete with Spanish producer
• Make use of the quality leadership in car batteries market
• Offer reliability testing, extended warranties etc. to promote quality image
• Set higher prices to extract surplus from these advantages
• A passive strategy, not proactive
• Recommendations: Alternative 1 is recommended in this case. Since the firm operates in an industry which has low growth, hence it can expand market share and sales only by taking the customers from other players. Hence, it needs to tackle the Spanish competitor head-on by aggressively pricing its product. At the same time, launching a low-priced product under the same brand name erodes the high quality image in the car batteries market. Hence, the best option is to go for an off-brand to target the fork-lift customers who are increasingly becoming price sensitive. This will enable the company to ward off the threat in short-term and build its position strongly in the long-term.

Case II: NAKAMURA LACQUER COMPANY

• The Nakamura Lacquer Company: The Nakamura Lacquer Company based in Kyoto, Japan was one of the many small handicraft shops making lacquerware for the daily table use of the Japanese people.
• Mr. Nakamura- the personality: In 1948, a young Mr. Nakamura took over his family business. He saw an opportunity to cater to a new market of America, i.e. GI's of the Occupation Army who had begun to buy lacquer ware as souvenirs. However, he realized that the traditional handicraft methods were inadequate. He was an innovator and introduced simple methods of processing and inspection using machines. Four years later, when the Occupation Army left in 1952, Nakamura employed several thousand men, and produced 500,000 pieces of lacquers tableware each year for the Japanese mass consumer market. The profit from operations was $250,000.
• The Brand: Nakamura named his brand “Chrysanthemum” after the national flower of Japan, which showed his patriotic fervor. The brand became Japan's best known and best selling brand, being synonymous with good quality, middle class and dependability.
• The Market: The market for lacquerware in Japan seems to have matured, with the production steady at 500,000 pieces a year. Nakamura did practically no business outside of Japan. However, early in 1960, when the American interest in Japanese products began to grow, Nakamura received two offers
• The Rose and Crown offer: The first offer was from Mr. Phil Rose, V.P Marketing at the National China Company. They were the largest manufacturer of good quality dinnerware in the U.S., with their “Rose and Crown” brand accounting for almost 30% of total sales. They were willing to give a firm order for three eyes for annual purchases of 400,000 sets of lacquer dinnerware, delivered in Japan and at 5% more than what the Japanese jobbers paid. However, Nakamura would have to forego the Chrysanthemum trademark to “Rose and Crown” and also undertaken to sell lacquer ware to anyone else the U.S. The offer promised returns of $720,000 over three years (with net returns of $83,000), but with little potential for the U.S. market on the Chrysanthemum brand beyond that period.
• The Semmelback offer: The second offer was from Mr. Walter Sammelback of Sammelback, Sammelback and Whittacker, Chicago, the largest supplier of hotel and restaurant supplies in the U.S. They perceived a U.S. market of 600,000 sets a year, expecting it to go up to 2 million in around 5 years. Since the Japanese government did not allow overseas investment, Sammelback was willing to budget $1.5 million. Although the offer implied negative returns of $467,000 over the first five years, the offer had the potential to give a $1 million profit if sales picked up as anticipated.
• Meeting the order: To meet the numbers requirement of the orders, Nakamura would either have to expand capacity or cut down on the domestic market. If he chose to expand capacity, the danger was of idle capacity in case the U.S. market did not respond. If he cut down on the domestic market, the danger was of losing out on a well-established market. Nakamura could also source part of the supply from other vendors. However, this option would not find favor with either of the American buyers since they had approached only Nakamura, realizing that he was the best person to meet the order.
• Decision problem: Whether to accept any of the two offers and if yes, which one of the two and under what terms of conditions?
• To expand into the U.S. market.
• To maintain and build upon their reputation of the “Chrysanthemum” brand
• To increase profit volumes by tapping the U.S. market and as a result, increasing scale of operations.
• To increase its share in the U.S. lacquerware market.
• Profit Maximization criterion: The most important criterion in the long run is profit maximization.
• Risk criterion: Since the demand in the U.S. market is not as much as in Japan.
• Brand identity criterion: Nakamura has painstakingly built up a brand name in Japan. It is desirable for him to compete in the U.S. market under the same brand name
• Flexibility criterion: The chosen option should offer Nakamura flexibility in maneuvering the terms and conditions to his advantage. Additionally, Nakamura should have bargaining power at the time of renewal of the contract.
• Short term returns: Nakamura should receive some returns on the investment he makes on the new offers. However, this criterion may be compromised in favor of profit maximization in the long run.?
• Reject both: React both the offers and concentrate on the domestic market
• Accept RC offer: Accept the Rose and Crown offer and supply the offer by cutting down on supplies to the domestic market or through capacity expansion or both
• Accept SSW: offer; accept the SSW offer and meet it through cutting down on supply to the domestic market or through capacity expansion or both. Negotiate term of supply.
• Reject both: This option would not meet the primary criterion of profit maximization. Further, the objective of growth would also not be met. Hence, this option is rejected.
• Accept RC offer: The RC offer would assure net returns of $283,000 over the next three yeas. It also assures regular returns of $240,000 per year. However, Nakamura would have no presence in the U.S. with its Chrysanthemum brand name The RC offer would entail capacity expansion, as it would not be possible to siphon of 275,000 pieces from the domestic market over three years without adversely affecting operations there. At the end of three years, Nakamura would have little bargaining power with RC as it would have an excess capacity of 275,000 pieces and excess labor which it would want to utilize. In this sense the offer is risky. Further, the offer is not flexible. Long-term profit maximization is uncertain in this case a condition that can be controlled in the SSW offer. Hence, this offer is rejected.
• Accept SSW offer: The SSW offer does not assure a firm order or any returns for the period of contract. Although, in its present form the offer is risky if the market in the U.S. does not pick up as expected, the offer is flexible. If Nakamura were to exhibit caution initially by supplying only 300,000 instead of the anticipated 600,000 pieces, it could siphon off the 175,000 required from the domestic market. If demand exists in the U.S., the capacity can be expanded. With this offer, risk is minimized. Further, it would be competing on its own brand name. Distribution would be taken care of and long-term profit maximization criterion would be satisfied as this option has the potential of $1 million in profits per year. At the time of renewal of the contract, Nakamura would have immense bargaining power.
• Negotiate terms of offer with SSW: The terms would be that NLC would supply 300,000 pieces in the first year. If market demand exists, NLC should expand capacity to provide the expected demand.
• Action Plan: In the first phase, NLC would supply SSW with 300,000 pieces. 125,000 of these would be obtained by utilizing excess capacity, while the remaining would be obtained from the domestic market. If the expected demand for lacquer ware exists in the U.S., NLC would expand capacity to meet the expected demand. The debt incurred would be paid off by the fifth year.
• Contingency Plan:  In case the demand is not as expected in the first year, NLC should not service the U.S. market and instead concentrate on increasing penetration in the domestic market.

FAQs about MBA Case Studies

• Group Discussions
• Personality
• Past Experiences

Most Popular Articles - PS

100 Group Discussion (GD) Topics for MBA 2024

Solved GDs Topic

Top 50 Other (Science, Economy, Environment) topics for GD

5 tips for starting a GD

GD FAQs: Communication

GD FAQs: Content

Stages of GD preparation

Group Discussion Etiquettes

Case Study: Tips and Strategy

Practice Case Studies: Long

Practice Case Studies: Short

5 tips for handling Abstract GD topics

5 tips for handling a fish market situation in GD

5 things to follow: if you don’t know much about the GD topic

Do’s and Don’ts in a Group Discussion

5 tips for handling Factual GD topics

How to prepare for Group Discussion