No
Yes (SSN not exposed)
Yes (SSN exposed)
Table 2 presents the prevalence of identity theft victimization overall and by subtype. The prevalence of overall identity theft victimization (any type) was 6.2% in the combined 2012/2014 sample (95%CI = 6.0%–6.3%). The most common form of victimization was existing credit card or bank account identity theft, with a prevalence of 5.6% (95%CI = 5.5%–5.8%).
Identity theft victimization frequencies.
Identity Theft Victimization Subtype | Combined 2012/2014 (n = 128,419) |
---|---|
n (%) | |
Any subtype | 7921 (6.2) |
Existing credit or bank account | 7241 (5.6) |
New accounts | 492 (0.4) |
Instrumental purposes | 350 (0.3) |
Table 3 presents results from the multivariable analysis of risk and protective factors of identity theft victimization for each subtype. Higher levels of online purchasing behavior were significantly associated with increasing odds of existing credit card/bank account and new accounts identity theft victimization; those engaging in daily online shopping were more than five times as likely to be victims of existing credit card/bank account identity theft as those not engaging in online purchasing (OR = 5.74, 95%CI = 4.31–7.64). Persons reporting breached personal information from a company or government were significantly more likely to experience identity theft, particularly if social security information was exposed (instrumental purposes: OR = 8.05, 95%CI = 5.66–11.46; new accounts: OR = 3.83, 95%CI = 2.67–5.51; existing credit/bank account: OR = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.26–1.68). Those reporting other NCVS victimizations were between 29% (existing credit/bank account: OR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.23–1.35) and 46% (new accounts: OR = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.32–1.62) more likely to be victims of identity theft with each successive crime. Individuals with a history of identity theft victimization were 28% more likely to be victimized by existing credit/bank account identity theft in the past year than those with no prior history (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.19–1.37).
Multivariable logistic regression models predicting identity theft victimization.
Independent Variables | Existing Credit or Bank Account (n = 116,042) | New Accounts (n = 128,419) | Instrumental (n = 128,419) |
---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Online purchasing behavior frequency (ref. None) | |||
Up to once per month (1–12 times/year) | 2.45 (2.28–2.63)*** | 1.71 (1.35–2.17)*** | 1.35 (1.02–1.78) |
Up to once per week (13–52 times/year) | 3.54 (3.27–3.83)*** | 1.78 (1.33–2.38)*** | 1.12 (0.77–1.64) |
Up to once per day (58–365 times/year) | 4.44 (4.02–4.90)*** | 1.89 (1.25–2.85) | 2.01 (1.28–3.16) |
More than once per day (More than 365 times/year) | 5.74 (4.31–7.64)*** | 4.52 (1.79–11.46) | 4.03 (1.39–11.70) |
Number of other victimizations (cont.) | 1.29 (1.23–1.35)*** | 1.46 (1.32–1.62)*** | 1.41 (1.24–1.60)*** |
Breached personal information (ref. No) | |||
Yes (SSN not exposed) | 1.44 (1.33–1.56)*** | 1.96 (1.44–2.66)*** | 2.16 (1.47–3.19)*** |
Yes (SSN exposed) | 1.46 (1.26–1.68)*** | 3.83 (2.67–5.51)*** | 8.05 (5.66–11.46)*** |
Identity theft victimization prior to past year (ref. No) Yes | 1.28 (1.19–1.37)*** | 1.43 (1.11–1.85) | 1.43 (1.05–1.95) |
Purchase protective services (cont.) | 1.02 (0.95–1.09) | 1.62 (1.28–2.06)*** | 1.37 (0.99–1.87) |
Routine protective behaviors (cont.) | 0.76 (0.75–0.78)*** | 0.66 (0.61–0.71)*** | 0.71 (0.65–0.78)*** |
Age generations (ref. millennials) | |||
Generation X | 1.21 (1.12–1.29)*** | 1.28 (1.00–1.65) | 1.68 (1.26–2.24)*** |
Baby boomers | 1.38 (1.29–1.48)*** | 1.70 (1.32–2.20)*** | 1.79 (1.32–2.42)*** |
Silent or Greatest | 1.10 (0.99–1.21) | 1.23 (0.86–1.78) | 1.12 (0.72–1.75) |
Gender (ref. Male) Female | 0.99 (0.94–1.04) | 0.95 (0.79–1.13) | 1.14 (0.92–1.42) |
Marital Status (ref. Married/partnered) Not married/partnered | 0.95 (0.90–1.01) | 1.23 (1.00–1.51) | 1.63 (1.28–2.09)*** |
Educational attainment (ref. High school or less) | |||
Some college or associate degree | 1.42 (1.33–1.52)*** | 1.70 (1.35–2.14)*** | 1.43 (1.11–1.86) |
Bachelor’s degree | 1.67 (1.56–1.80)*** | 1.66 (1.25–2.20)*** | 1.18 (0.84–1.66) |
Graduate/professional degree | 1.90 (1.74–2.07)*** | 1.85 (1.31–2.61) | 0.95 (0.59–1.50) |
Race/ethnicity (ref. non-Hispanic white) | |||
Hispanic | 0.85 (0.78–0.93)*** | 1.32 (1.00–1.73) | 0.93 (0.66–1.32) |
Black | 0.78 (0.71–0.86)*** | 1.43 (1.11–1.86) | 1.58 (1.20–2.09) |
AAPI/AIAN | 0.78 (0.70–0.87)*** | 0.73 (0.46–1.16) | 0.69 (0.39–1.22) |
Other | 1.09 (0.89–1.32) | 3.32 (2.17–5.09)*** | 1.18 (056–2.50) |
Household income (ref. $0 to 24,999) | |||
$25,000 to 49,999 | 1.05 (0.95–1.15) | 0.77 (0.60–1.00) | 0.90 (0.67–1.21) |
$50,000 to 74,999 | 1.20 (1.08–1.33) | 0.73 (0.54–0.99) | 0.80 (0.56–1.13) |
$75,000+ | 1.38 (1.25–1.52)*** | 0.71 (0.52–0.97) | 0.74 (0.52–1.05) |
Number of household members ≤ 12 years (cont.) | 1.01 (0.98–1.05) | 1.20 (1.08–1.33) | 1.21 (1.07–1.36) |
Residential setting (ref. urban) Rural | 0.90 (0.84–0.96) | 0.80 (0.61–1.05) | 0.65 (0.46–0.91) |
Interview type (ref. In-person) Telephone | 0.91 (0.87–0.96)*** | 0.85 (0.71–1.02) | 0.74 (0.60–0.92) |
Note: All multivariable logistic regression models, except the New Accounts model, satisfied the Omnibus Test of Model Coefficients (p < 0.01). All multivariable logistic regression models satisfied the Hosmer-Lemeshow Test (p > 0.05). Across models, independent variables had tolerance of 0.70 or above and variance inflation factor of 1.43 or below, indicating no concern of multicollinearity.
CI = Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; SSN: Social Security Number; AAPI/AIAN = Asian American/Pacific Islander/American Indian/Alaskan Native. ***p < 0.001, (two-tailed tests).
Individuals engaging in a higher number of proactive, routine protective behaviors, such as shredding documents and updating passwords, were between 25% (existing credit/bank account: OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.75–0.78) and 35% (new accounts: OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.61–0.71) less likely to experience identity theft victimization with each additional protective behavior. Purchasing credit monitoring services and identity theft insurance, however, was associated with significantly higher odds of new accounts (OR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.28–2.06) identity theft.
Across all identity theft subtypes, baby boomers were most likely to be victims (existing credit/bank account: OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.29–1.48; new accounts: OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.32–2.20; instrumental: OR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.32–2.42). Unmarried/un-partnered persons were 63% (OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.28–2.09) more likely to experience instrumental forms of identity theft. Higher levels of education were associated with increasingly higher odds of both existing credit card/bank account and new accounts forms of identity theft. Compared to non-Hispanic whites, existing credit/bank account victimization was less likely among Hispanic (OR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.78–0.93), Black (OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.71–0.86), and AAPI/AIAN (OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.70–0.87) persons. Persons living in households in the highest income bracket were most likely to experience existing credit/bank account identity theft (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.25–1.52) compared to those in the lowest income households. As a methodological finding, respondents who participated in a telephone rather than in-person interview were significantly less likely to report identity theft victimization.
Approximately 1 out of every 15 adults aged sixteen years or older in the U.S. – over 16 million people – experience some form of identity theft each year. In addition to direct losses, consequences may include damaged credit, legal fees, loss of trust, and health outcomes such as stress, anxiety, and depression ( Harrell, 2015 , Golladay and Holtfreter, 2017 ). Among victims who experienced the misuse of personal information for instrumental purposes, approximately 56% suffered moderate to severe distress, a similar percentage as seen among victims of violence ( Harrell, 2015 ).
As large-scale data breaches have become an unfortunate part of our growing tech-based marketplace, this analysis examined whether online purchasing behavior and personal data security practices affect the risk of identity theft victimization, or whether becoming a victim is largely contingent on corporate and government-level data breaches. Findings provide support for the L-RAT model of victimization which suggests that individual lifestyle routines and degree of protective measures/guardianship influence the likelihood of victimization.
Respondents who stated that their information was part of a large data breach were significantly more likely to report all forms of identity theft, particularly when their social security numbers were exposed. Victims of identity theft for instrumental purposes were eight times as likely to say their social security numbers were exposed in a data breach compared to non-victims, likely because that form of identity theft requires social security numbers to access government benefits and other services. Although it is not possible to assess whether data breaches directly caused identity theft incidents, data breaches were significantly correlated with the misuse of identity information.
L-RAT proposes that routine lifestyle behaviors contribute to crime victimization risk. In the present study, individual risk and protective behaviors were consistent and strong (magnitude) predictors. Similar to findings using a Canadian sample ( Reyns & Henson, 2016 ), increasing levels of online purchasing activity were associated with incrementally higher odds of financial account and new account identity theft. Participating in commercial activities online reflects a major societal innovation and lifestyle shift that has allowed consumers to purchase products conveniently and globally, but entering personal data online entrusts vendors to safely store and manage this data. For example, Holtfreter et al. (2015) found that individuals who placed an order with a company they had never done business with before were significantly more likely to be victims of identity theft. While the NCVS ITS does not ask respondents what online retailers they have made purchases from, it is likely that as the frequency of online shopping increases, the odds of using an unsecured payment portal or having information exposed in a retail data breach increases. Further innovations in online security and payment systems are required to protect users’ information, and future research should explore precisely how online purchasing activities expose personal information.
In support of the guardianship principle of L-RAT, proactive individual behaviors, like shredding personal documents and routinely changing account passwords, significantly reduced the likelihood of identity theft. Unfortunately, the Pew Research Center ( Olmstead & Smith, 2017 ) found that half of U.S. respondents were not educated about everyday security practices. Given that routine safety behaviors reduce risk of identity theft, consumer protection efforts need to focus on educating consumers on the basics of online security. Purchasing external credit monitoring and identity theft protection services did not reduce risk and was related to greater likelihood of new accounts identity theft victimization. Perhaps respondents who purchased these services had some knowledge that their identity may be misused. Another explanation is that some criminal entities have reached a level of sophistication to evolve techniques ahead of current industry protection standards ( Moore et al., 2009 ).
This study found that exposure to other types of crime, as well as prior experiences with identity theft, were associated with a greater risk of identity theft victimization. Personal information may be stolen during the course of other crimes directly (e.g., theft of wallets, bank statements) or indirectly through theft of devices that contain personal information. This result is consistent with financial fraud research—prior fraud victimization increases the odds of re-victimization ( Titus et al., 1995 ). An underground system exists for identity theft where specified pieces of stolen identifying information are bundled and sold to other criminals, thereby increasing the odds that it is used for various identity crimes over time ( Moore et al., 2009 ). Services for identity theft victims should include help contacting the major credit bureaus to place a temporary freeze or fraud alert on credit reports to prevent criminals from opening new accounts with victims’ stolen credentials.
The socioeconomic and demographic risk patterns found in this study were roughly consistent with the predictions of L-RAT. In general, members of Generation X and the baby boomers, now between the ages of 39 and 73, were at the highest risk of most types of identity theft. This likely reflects the socioeconomic capacity and consumption patterns among Generation X and baby boomers relative to millennials. Together, these older generations constitute the bulk of the U.S. workforce and, therefore, have the economic means to engage in consumer activities where identities may be exposed. Longitudinal data is needed to determine whether the association between middle to late adulthood and increased risk of identity theft is indeed due to lifestyles or whether age has an independent effect.
Compared to Hispanic, Black, and Asian respondents, White respondents and those with higher educational attainment experienced significantly higher risk of existing credit card/bank account identity theft. Individuals with higher socioeconomic status have more purchasing power ( Charron-Chénier et al., 2017 ), have more access to credit ( Haushofer & Fehr, 2014 ), own more internet-enabled devices that store and transfer personal information, and are more likely to use credit cards ( Greene & Stavins, 2016 ). In support of L-RAT, this suggests that the association between existing credit card/bank account identity theft and demographic/socioeconomic profiles is related to lifestyle factors where there is greater reliance on these financial instruments, and thus more opportunities for criminals to intercept account information.
While the NCVS Identity Theft Supplement is one of the most comprehensive sources of data on identity theft, the survey likely underestimates the true extent of the problem. First, the NCVS excluded adult sub-populations who may be particularly vulnerable, such as those living with cognitive impairment and/or in institutional settings. Second, the literature on financial fraud victimization finds that people tend to under-report victimization in survey research ( Beals et al., 2015 ), and this self-report error likely extends to the issue of identity theft. Finally, the nonresponse group is likely disproportionately represented by victims who are reluctant to provide personal information in response to a survey. Another limitation of the study was that data on other potentially important behavioral variables, such as the extent of online downloading, online financial account management, types of websites visited, and presence of malware, hacking or phishing events, were unavailable. To better understand risk of identity theft victimization within the L-RAT paradigm, measures are needed to account for system-level security practices among corporate and government entities, but this is beyond the scope of the NCVS.
Identity theft victimization affects tens of millions of Americans each year. Financial exploitation, in general, is associated with major health-related consequences such as increased rates of hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Victims of identity theft experience severe mental/emotional distress, particularly among minority and older adult populations ( Harrell, 2019 , Golladay and Holtfreter, 2017 ). Given the increasing scope of this problem, the development of effective primary prevention strategies is critically needed and should focus on promoting relatively unintrusive and feasible everyday practices such as routinely changing financial account passwords, shredding documents, and checking credit reports and financial statements. The prevalence of this problem indicates that healthcare professionals will encounter patients who are victimized by identity theft on a regular basis. Healthcare settings represent an important place to both recognize vulnerable adults and provide victims with preventive education to mitigate the risk of identity exposure.
This study comprehensively examined the risk of different forms of identity theft victimization in the U.S. Although other research indicates that Americans have inadequate knowledge of cybersecurity practices ( Olmstead & Smith, 2017 ), findings from the current study demonstrated the importance of this knowledge in keeping personal information safe. Yet individual actions alone are not enough. As investment in cybersecurity grows, criminals respond with increasingly sophisticated and evolving techniques such as hacking, malware, and skimming to overcome these controls ( Pontell, 2009 ). Reducing the incidence of identity theft requires greater public/private investment in robust, dynamic data security systems and encryption tools, and more collaboration between criminal justice and law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute identity theft crimes.
David Burnes: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Marguerite DeLiema: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Lynn Langton: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Appendix B Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101058 .
Multiple Correspondence Analysis Discrimination Measures Plot.
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, identity theft and university students: do they know, do they care.
Journal of Financial Crime
ISSN : 1359-0790
Article publication date: 30 September 2014
This study aims to explain what factors influence the relationship between the university students’ knowledge of the risk of identity theft and the preventive measures they take.
A series of semi-structured interviews was used as the primary data collection tool. The sample for this study comprised 12 undergraduate students (six males and six females) from the Flinders Business School. The interviews were designed as face-to-face interviews.
The current findings indicate that, despite the fact that students were reasonably knowledgeable regarding the general risk of identity theft, many of the students had only limited knowledge about specific issues related to identity theft. It was found that the limited knowledge or misunderstanding of specific issues prevented students from using appropriate measures that could reduce the risk of identity theft. The students demonstrated a significant misunderstanding of who perpetrators typically were targeting when stealing personal information or what perpetrators of identity theft were looking for.
The results of the study contribute to a better understanding of the students’ knowledge about the risks associated with identity crime. They may also assist governments and other stakeholders with vested interests, such as financial institutions and educational providers, to educate individuals about the circumstances where they are potentially vulnerable to identity theft.
Seda, L. (2014), "Identity theft and university students: do they know, do they care?", Journal of Financial Crime , Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 461-483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2013-0032
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
All feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Contact Customer Support
Home > STUDENTS > THESES > 1172
Identity theft among college students.
Laura B. Lucas , Eastern Illinois University
Master of Science (MS)
Recommended citation.
Lucas, Laura B., "Identity Theft Among College Students" (2013). Masters Theses . 1172. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/1172
Since December 04, 2013
Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons
Advanced Search
Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement
Privacy Copyright
Identity theft is one of the most widely used crimes which involve the use of personal data by other individuals. This essay tells about identity theft background and gives the definition of this term. It highlights the ways of how the personal information can be stolen by criminals. It indicates main types of identity theft and explains the consequences of this type of crime for victims. It also demonstrates the facts that back up the main points of the paper.
Get a price quote
Identity theft is a crime for which the personal data are used illegally for material gain. The information from the Social Security number, credit card number, bank account, telephone calling card number and other types of personal data can be used by other people for stealing money. In some cases, it is only necessary to know the victim’s name in order to commit the identity theft. Victims of the identity theft may lose not only the financial costs, but also struggle with the attempt to restore their reputation as a result of using their personal data by criminals. Criminals can apply the stolen personal information in order to fill in the false application for loans or credit cards or fulfill the fraudulent withdrawals from bank accounts.
We offer a facility whereby customers can liaise directly with their writer, so response is rapid.
There are several types of the identity theft that could be identified as criminal, financial, medical, child identity theft and identity cloning. Criminal identity theft occurs when a person, who just was arrested, presents to police the fake ID or other stolen documents that identify him or her as another person. Subsequently, it could be difficult for the victims to clean the criminal record as a result of violation of their rights. Financial identity theft is the most common form of identity theft that is used in order to obtain, goods, services or credit. Usually, along with a wallet people stole credit cards and use them in order to obtain cash. At the large perspective, people steal the private financial information with the help of computer programs and conduct transactions with a victim’s money. Medical identity theft usually occurs when a theft wants to obtain prescription drugs or see a doctor while using the victim name or health insurance numbers. Very often, the payment records and credit report of the victim are affected after the mix of the victim and thief’s health information. Medical identity theft is one of the most dangerous forms of identity theft as it could be resulted into incorrect medical treatment of the victim in the future. A child identity theft occurs when a thief the Social Security number in order to apply for government benefits or other needs. Identity cloning is a type of identity theft when criminal pretends to be a different person. Instead of stealing private information, they actually can commit crimes in someone’s name.
There are many ways of protection that banks and government use in order to escape the identity theft among the general population. However, people should guard their personal information on their own. Many people prefer to buy goods over online shopping. Thus, it is important to clear logins and passwords while using a public computer. It is better to pay from credit cards which have guarantees under federal law. It is important to be careful while entering personal data on different Web sites. People should monitor their credit reports, bank and credit card statements. For companies and large corporations, it is necessary to shred all sensitive documents that can provide the criminal with financial and private information.
Identity theft is a growing problem in the world electronic community. It is the fastest growing crime in the United States (Reed, 2). The Department of Justice in the U.S. indicated that that 8.6 million Americans suffered from identity in 2010. It is 2.2 million more than in 2005. A total financial loss was estimated as 13.3 billion dollars. (Tugent, 4). On average, it is necessary to spend approximately 33 hours and 500 dollars for victim in order to resolve the identity theft crime. About 19 people become the victims of the identity theft each minute. One of the main problems is that it is difficult to detect the criminals and arrest them. Only 1in 700 identity crimes end up with the arrest (Reed, 5).
Identity theft could be one of the main criminal issues in the future. The growing number of cases only proves this tendency. It is difficult for the authority to detect criminals who are going to commit the identity theft. That is why people should always be careful with their personal information.
Reed, B., (2012). “5 frightening facts about identity theft”. Retrieved from site
Our outstanding writers are mostly educated to MA and PhD level
All banks offer fraud protection, id theft protection through your bank has drawbacks, free identity theft protection tools, does your bank offer identity theft protection these 5 do -- and some plans are free.
Your bank account may come with identity theft montioring perks to keep identity thieves at bay. But it won't provide the most comprehensive protection.
Geoff Williams
Contributor
Geoff Williams is a journalist and author. His byline has appeared in numerous publications, including U.S. News & World Report, Yahoo Finance, Entertainment Weekly, The Washington Post, LIFE magazine, CNNMoney.com, The Wall Street Journal's Buy Side and Consumer Reports. He is also the author of several books, including "C.C. Pyle's Amazing Foot Race" (Tantor Media) and "Washed Away" (Pegasus Books).
Danni Santana
Danni Santana has spent seven years as an editor and business journalist covering industries like sports, retail, restaurants, and now personal finance. Most recently he worked as a retail editor at Business Insider. He is a graduate of the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY. His biggest loves outside of the newsroom include, running, cooking, playing video games and collecting sneakers.
CNET staff -- not advertisers, partners or business interests -- determine how we review the products and services we cover. If you buy through our links, we may get paid.
Identity theft is a major problem -- and it’s only gotten worse since the onset of the pandemic as criminals find new and creative ways to extract your personal information online. The good news is identity theft protection goes a long way in keeping identity thieves at bay, and you may qualify for free or low-cost coverage through your bank.
Most basic ID theft protection services cost around $10 to $15 per month from industry leaders like Aura or LifeLock. If you can’t foot that bill, it could be worth seeing if your bank offers ID theft protection for free or at a discounted price.
You won’t get nearly the same coverage and features as you would with a traditional identity theft company, but you could get free dark web, Social Security number and credit monitoring. Some even offer identity theft insurance.
Here’s a crash course on what’s available now, exclusively to banking customers.
Most of the banks that offer identity theft protection are big banks with physical branch access. Many of these banks charge monthly fees to maintain an account, so while you might get identity theft services, they’re not really free.
Here are some of the more prominent banks offering identity theft protection to customers.
Fifth Third Bank offers its customers two identity theft plans: Fifth Third Identity Alert and Fifth Third Identity Alert Premium for $11 or $16 a month, respectively. But discounts are available if you have specific Fifth Third Bank deposit accounts.
Fifth Third Identity Alert | Fifth Third Identity Alert Premium | |
Fifth Third Checking or Express Banking account | $7 per month | $10 per month |
Fifth Third Preferred or Private Bank Checking account | $0 | $5 per month |
All other deposit accounts | $11 per month | $16 per month |
With Fifth Third Identity Alert, customers receive daily credit monitoring for one bureau and monthly monitoring for all three (Equifax, Experian and TransUnion). The plan also includes dark web and Social Security number monitoring and identity theft insurance up to $25,000.
Fifth Third Identity Alert Premium increases the potential payout in identity theft insurance to $1 million and tacks on daily credit monitoring for all three major bureaus. In addition, Social Security number monitoring is extended to up to 10 children.
Provident Credit Union’s identity theft protection service offers monthly credit score updates, home title and change of address monitoring, and up to $1 million in insurance that covers out of pocket expenses if your identity is stolen.
Other standout features include dark web monitoring, full-service identity restoration services and personal information monitoring. The latter involves the scanning of websites, blogs and other corners of the internet for your personal data.
Plans for individuals are $7 per month or $78 per year. Family plans, which also include child identity monitoring, cost $12 per month and $139 if billed annually.
Commerce Bank offers Commerce ID Recover for $5.49 a month and Commerce ID Monitor for $12.99 a month to bank customers.
Commerce ID Recover features a password manager , an online identity vault (you can encrypt and store sensitive information and documents online), emailed breach and fraud news alerts and an identity management mobile app.
You get all of this and more with Commerce ID Monitor. As the name implies, this plan will monitor the dark web for your personal information and also includes daily credit monitoring for one bureau. Additionally, under this plan, you can choose to protect one other member of your household.
Both Commerce ID Recover and ID Monitor offer $25,000 in ID theft reimbursement insurance, identity restoration services and 24/7 customer support.
Capital One ‘s identity theft service is rolled into CreditWise, a free credit score notification service that also scans the dark web for your personal identifiable information. The goal? To find out whether your personal information is compromised and available to identity thieves on the creepiest parts of the internet.
If your personal information is found on the dark web, CreditWise will alert you so you can take the proper precautions, like changing a password, freezing your credit report or contacting your credit card company. CreditWise also monitors your TransUnion credit report for any signs of identity theft.
In the Chase Mobile app , Chase offers customers a feature called Chase Credit Journey. It’s a free tool, primarily designed to help you get your credit score back on track.
However, the credit monitoring service also gives you an Experian credit report and a personal dashboard to help you keep track of your credit usage, limits and balances. If you’re subscribed to Chase Credit Journey and an identity thief opens a new credit account in your name, you’ll be notified by Chase and can take action.
Alternatively, you can also check your credit reports from all three credit bureaus, including Equifax and TransUnion, yourself. Just keep in mind that credit reports help to identify identity theft only after it happens.
Even if your bank doesn’t formally offer identity theft protection, all banks will monitor customer accounts for signs of fraud. They also offer a zero-dollar liability guarantee. So if someone uses your credit card to make an unauthorized purchase and you report it, you won’t be held responsible.
Of course, you may be looking to protect yourself further rather than just relying on your bank’s fraud detection software. Start with asking your bank if they offer any identity theft protection services.
If you’re not satisfied with the offerings, consider signing up for identity theft protection. We recommend Aura , our best overall identity theft protection service pick. Identity Guard and Identity Force are also good choices for family plans.
While banks can offer serviceable ID theft protection depending on your needs, there are some services that they don’t have that will require you to sign up for a traditional service instead:
Data breaches happen more often than we think, even at banks, and can grant cybercriminals access to our most sensitive financial and personal information. So there’s a strong case for paying for an identity theft protection service for peace of mind.
But not everybody has the money to shell out to an ID theft protection company. If you’re worried about identity theft and don’t think you can afford a service, there are still a lot of free steps you can take, including:
CNET editors independently choose every product and service we cover. Though we can’t review every available financial company or offer, we strive to make comprehensive, rigorous comparisons in order to highlight the best of them. For many of these products and services, we earn a commission. The compensation we receive may impact how products and links appear on our site.
Writers and editors and produce editorial content with the objective to provide accurate and unbiased information. A separate team is responsible for placing paid links and advertisements, creating a firewall between our affiliate partners and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers.
CNET Money is an advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We’re compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and services, or when you click on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact where and in what order affiliate links appear within advertising units. While we strive to provide a wide range of products and services, CNET Money does not include information about every financial or credit product or service.
Advertisement
As governor of Minnesota, he has enacted policies to secure abortion protections, provide free meals for schoolchildren, allow recreational marijuana and set renewable energy goals.
By Maggie Astor
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, the newly announced running mate to Vice President Kamala Harris, has worked with his state’s Democratic-controlled Legislature to enact an ambitious agenda of liberal policies: free college tuition for low-income students, free meals for schoolchildren, legal recreational marijuana and protections for transgender people.
“You don’t win elections to bank political capital,” Mr. Walz wrote last year about his approach to governing. “You win elections to burn political capital and improve lives.”
Republicans have slammed these policies as big-government liberalism and accused Mr. Walz of taking a hard left turn since he represented a politically divided district in Congress years ago.
Here is an overview of where Mr. Walz stands on some key issues.
Mr. Walz signed a bill last year that guaranteed Minnesotans a “fundamental right to make autonomous decisions” about reproductive health care on issues such as abortion, contraception and fertility treatments.
Abortion was already protected by a Minnesota Supreme Court decision, but the new law guarded against a future court reversing that precedent as the U.S. Supreme Court did with Roe v. Wade, and Mr. Walz said this year that he was also open to an amendment to the state’s Constitution that would codify abortion rights.
Another bill he signed legally shields patients, and their medical providers, if they receive an abortion in Minnesota after traveling from a state where abortion is banned.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
COMMENTS
estimated 27 million victims in the U.S. in the five-year period 1998-2003 (Synovate, 2003, p. 12), and over 33 million since 1990 making approximately one in six adults in. the U.S. a victim of identity theft (Givens, 2003, p. 3). The effects of identity theft on the victim can be devastating, both psychologically.
This study aims to provide an understanding of the nature, extent, and quality of the research evidence on identity fraud victimization in the US. Specifically, this article reviews, summarizes, and comments on the state of empirical research of identity fraud victimization in the US based on a narrative review of 52 published empirical studies. Studies included in this review suggest that the ...
A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology ... Dr. Ryan Broll Identity theft, the theft and misuse of another person's identity information, has increased in North America over the past decade, with almost 10 percent of adults victimized annually.
A. THESIS STATEMENT Identity theft is a widespread computer security issue which needs to be addressed through user awareness and training. To speak to this need, this thesis incorporates current research on identity theft attacks and prevention techniques into a customized scenario definition file for the CyberCIEGE game engine.
Identity Theft Awareness in North Central West Virginia Gwendolyn Lea Goodrich ... Part of theCriminology and Criminal Justice Commons This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and ... bank statements, or credit applications . Identity Theft ...
ns of identity theft victimization influence the use of protective measures. Identity theft is a major problem in the 21st century and it is recommended. that people safeguard themselves by practicing personal protective behavior. However, there are relatively few studies which. examine variables that affect the use of identity theft protective ...
Each of the introductions below presents the same thesis statement: "Identity theft is a serious problem that claims millions of innocent victims, and the government must implement better regulations to help put an end to this crime." While the thesis statement is the same for all of the introductions, notice how the various introductions set ...
This modern form of deviant behavior has come to be known as computer crime, e-crime, or cybercrime. Identity theft is considered the most harmful cybercrime on a personal level. A cybercriminal can use elaborate techniques such as social engineering, phishing, and malware attacks to collect personal information to commit fraudulent crimes ...
identity theft can occur, the different risk levels associated with breaches, and who identity theft affects and how. This thesis explores existing laws and safeguards and their effectiveness in protecting financial institutions, business entities, education establishments, the federal government, and consumers from identity theft crimes and the
consequences of identity theft have vast implications for both privacy and security. 2. As identified by idSafe, (2019), identity theft is typically an invisible crime, made. possible by the ...
Identity theft has proven to be a problematic phenomenon for researchers to study. This is mostly due to a lack of a shared definition for the term; lack of understanding for the types of identity ...
The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of identity theft, including what is currently known about the trends and patterns of identity theft, information on offenders and victims, as well as the methods of carrying out identity theft from the available data on offenders. In the next section, we present data from various agencies and ...
This thesis is an investigation of identity theft, although not a new crime it has recently attracted public concern. This concern has led to both federal and state governments to establish new laws to provide increased protection. Government agencies and the media have warned the public that an individual's social security number and other personal information are the tools that unscrupulous ...
The research found that identity theft generally involves three stages: acquisition of the identity information, the thief's use of the information for personal gain to the detriment of the victim of identity theft, and discovery of the identity theft. Evidence indicates that the longer it takes to discover the theft, the greater the loss ...
1. Introduction. Identity theft - defined as the intentional, unauthorized use of a person's identifying information for unlawful purposes (Federal Trade Commission, 1998, Koops and Leenes, 2006) - is a growing public health problem.While identity theft is not a new crime, the magnitude of the problem has increased with society's growing reliance on the electronic transfer and storage ...
medical practices is diminished by identity theft and medical identity fraud. The specific business problem is that some healthcare leaders in medical practices lack strategies to reduce identity theft and medical identity fraud. Purpose Statement The purpose of this qualitative, multiple case study was to explore the strategies
The students demonstrated a significant misunderstanding of who perpetrators typically were targeting when stealing personal information or what perpetrators of identity theft were looking for. , - The results of the study contribute to a better understanding of the students' knowledge about the risks associated with identity crime.
By Laura B. Lucas, Published on 01/01/13. Recommended Citation. Lucas, Laura B., "Identity Theft Among College Students" (2013).
The average annual theft per stolen identity was estimated at $6,383 in 2006, up approximately 22% from $5,248 in 2003; an increase in estimated total theft from $53.2 billion in 2003 to $56.6 billion in 2006. About three million Americans each year fall victim to the worst kind of identity fraud: new account fraud.
Pages: 2 Words: 696. Identity theft is a kind of theft that involves someone stealing the identity of someone else by assuming that person's identity (Lai, Li, & Hsieh, 2012). This is usually a method of gaining access to the person's resources like credit cards and other things in the person's name.
Identity theft facts. Identity theft is a growing problem in the world electronic community. It is the fastest growing crime in the United States (Reed, 2). The Department of Justice in the U.S. indicated that that 8.6 million Americans suffered from identity in 2010. It is 2.2 million more than in 2005.
Each of the introductions below presents the same thesis statement: "Identity theft is a serious problem that claims millions of innocent victims, and the government must implement better regulations to help put an end to this crime." While the thesis statement is the same for all of the introductions, notice how the various introductions
Provident Credit Union's identity theft protection service offers monthly credit score updates, home title and change of address monitoring, and up to $1 million in insurance that covers out of ...
During his re-election campaign for governor in 2022, he said that he wanted electric vehicles to account for 20 percent of cars on Minnesota roads by 2030, and that he wanted the state to reach ...