mapss thesis award

• Remember me Not recommended on shared computers

Forgot your password?

• Anthropology Forum

My Experience as a MAPSS (UChicago) Anthro Student: Review

• decisions decisions
• anthropology

By striped December 12, 2018 in Anthropology Forum

Recommended Posts

It has been a long time since I've been to this forum, but I thought I would write this post to share my experiences as an anthro major in undergrad to getting my MA through the MAPSS program at UChicago, and where I am now, in case any of you are wondering if it's worth it, or are just looking for some perspective in a field that is only getting more difficult to make something of, both academically and professionally. Please note that this review/perspective is from someone who decided *NOT* to pursue a PhD, but instead chose a non-academic career path.

Maybe you can relate to this feeling, but when I was in undergrad, friends and family smirked when I told them I was pursuing anthropology. "What will you do with it?" and all other questions ensued. I myself wasn't too sure what I was going to "do" with it; I believed college was for pursuing what made you feel whole, and the "job" aspect of it was only an afterthought. Immature and naive, especially for a student going some $25,000 into debt at an unremarkable California State University. I did it, and considered going into the Peace Corps and made it through the final interviews, but ultimately didn't go. I was working in customer service at a tech company, answering phones all day. Personal things in my life made me move from NorCal to SoCal and I was in my second round of applying to graduate school after being rejected by the seven programs I had applied to the year prior. That second cycle I was only admitted to UChicago's MAPSS program and after a month of anguish over whether I should take out more debt (I had 50% funding), I decided to do it. 

I'm not really a strong proponent for MAPSS.  I had spent hours and hours researching the program, talking to professors before I accepted, to educate myself on what my day-to-day would be like there. I found that the experience did differ pretty significantly from what I was told. It really was a grueling time, but that isn't to say it wasn't worth it.

Lowlights / Highlights of the Experience

-While I wouldn't call the program a "Cash Cow" program like so many LOVE to quip, there were  aspects  that made it feel that way, like the forced "Perspectives" course. That was far and away  the  most useless university course I've ever taken. It is a surface-level course that goes over different major concepts/canonical works of the various social sciences. It's bad enough we had to waste 2.5 hours of our lives once a week in the dreadfully boring lectures, but to make it worse, the grading for the midterm/final is so severe that it is set up for students to fail. Out of my cohort of about 240 people who were forced to take the class, only 17 people received an A or A- on their midterm, and the figure was lower for the final. I was told that anything less than a B+/B in graduate school is considered to be failing, so a B+/B is considered a C or C- in terms of GPA. I have no idea what the program's logic is to forcing you to take a class and then taking a blow to your GPA right out the gate. Seriously. ????? The fact that students are forced to take this course makes it feel like the program does it just to make more money off the enrollment or something and then kicks you while you're down on top it all.

-The MAPSS cohort is sadly what many have described. Most MAPSS students are not very intellectual--that's not to say they weren't "smart" in their own right, but they did not compare to the level of the other graduate students in terms of how intellectual they were. You could tell right away who was a MAPSS student in your classes versus PhD students. MAPSS students weirdly tend to have a sort of braggart, or pretentious, way about them when the things they would drivel on about were inane topics that you might find a newly-minted freshman undergraduate might talk about. I knew many MAPSS students who thought they were just so smart and would constantly, CONSTANTLY whine about the workload and how everything was so 'unfair'. It was insufferable to listen to because no one forced them to do the program, and the workload, while difficult, was not impossible (and, I had a part time job!). This being said, I made no friends at MAPSS. They lacked the maturity that I seem to find in PhD candidates or even some undergraduates.

-I did very well academically only because I lived and breathed the program. I had a part time job, but I was able to work from home which was a huge part in why I could dedicate myself wholly to the program. I spent almost all of my free time in the Regenstein library and it got to be depressing sometimes, but I found ways to make it somewhat positive (like always treating myself to hot tea or coffee and taking little breaks to draw). I think to be successful in MAPSS you have to be very independent and self-motivating; otherwise, it will be easy to lose sight of what you're doing/why. I think others have mentioned this, but do make it a priority to go downtown and explore the other neighborhoods of Chicago. I would "treat" myself to a bus/El ride and just go anywhere, to see something new, to see something that wasn't UChicago. It helped immensely. 

-I had read about the difficulties of finding an adviser/establishing a relationship early on with a potential adviser, so in my first quarter I zeroed in on the faculty member I really wanted to work with. I made sure to take at least one class of his every quarter, participated in all discussions, did all the readings, and did very well when it came to group projects. He would take smoking breaks and I would join him, or I would walk with him to his office after class. I didn't ask him to be my adviser until much later; I just built a relationship with him and got to know him and his work, and allowed him to get to know me. If you aren't a go-getter in this way like I was, I think finding an adviser is very difficult. I knew many people who had to have preceptors assigned as their advisers because they couldn't find anyone willing. 

-One of the saddest moments I had in the program was during the office hours with said adviser of mine. He told me that he didn't expect much in terms of quality from MAPSS students, but was sympathetic to their plight (earning a master's and doing fieldwork//research/composing a thesis in 9 months) and sort of graded based on that, which was very disappointing to hear. I had hoped I would be treated like any other PhD student who was completing the MA portion of their candidacy, but that's not the case. He also revealed to me that he knows of some professors who  ban  MAPSS students from taking their courses because of the inferior quality of discussion that MAPSS students bring to the table, which was heartbreaking to hear as well. 

-While all of these things are really disappointing about MAPSS, I will say that the academics of UChicago seriously changed my life. I am also someone who takes academic matters seriously, so maybe this isn't saying all that much, but the classes I took were some of the most amazing and beautifully taught courses I've ever taken. I was exposed to wonderful academic literature that will stay with me forever. If you are someone who appreciates knowledge and academic inquiry for its own sake, I think you will be hard-pressed to find a more rigorous university than UChicago. If MAPSS is the only option you have at this moment to experience that, I would say it's worth it for that alone.

Where I'm at Now

All this being said, I did well and graduated in Spring with only 20% of my cohort (the rest graduated in August). I earned an A on my thesis, but it likely was inflated because of my adviser's sympathies to the MAPSS program, which I struggle with when listing that as an "accomplishment". After graduating, I worked full time for a bit for the company I had been working for during the program, and took 3 months off to live in Hungary. While abroad I interviewed for market research positions/firms and landed a position at a very prominent global market research firm, I'm 25 years old and my starting pay is 75k which exceeded my hopes and expectations for earning potential as someone with a "useless" undergraduate and graduate degree in anthropology. I will be able to pay off my student debt and live decently on that income, which is what I personally could only have hoped for in taking such a huge risk to pursue what I loved, anthropology.

This is just one experience among many. I'm nothing/no one special, but I did work very hard in the program and I worked hard to secure a job that is related to my degrees and research interests. I did not "like" the program in the least, but I don't regret doing it. It was the most difficult academic year of my life and I did have to seek counseling in the Winter quarter which helped a lot- the student mental health services are very easy to access, so please avail yourself of that if you need it. 

I hope this review helped! 

• missaque , neurotransmitori , moonbase and 5 others

Link to comment

Share on other sites.

• 4 weeks later...

My experience with MAPSS was somewhat similar (2011/12). I found the academic experience to be lacking, coming from a very strong anthro undergrad program and having done ethnographic research for my undergrad thesis and having already been published in a major journal. I spent much of my time in MAPSS by myself, studying and wishing for the program to be over and to be far far away from my cohort, many of whom did a lot of complaining and seemed arrogant for no reason. It's just not possible for most people to accomplish much in terms of research in nine months, and most of the UChicago professors know this. My advisor was mostly a joke and clearly didn't care about his MA students (really the feeling was mutual), though my preceptor was very helpful. I did graduate with an "A" on my thesis and with a 3.9 GPA after doing what felt like little new academic work (most of what we did in classes, except for 500 level, I had already read/analyzed as an undergrad). MAPSS was very much a tick in the box for my resume and a tick in the financial box for UChicago (read: cash cow), though I was on a partial scholarship. I went on to work in international development abroad and now hold a senior position at a U.S.-based organization which I enjoy. However I am waiting on PhD apps for Fall 2019 after six years of relevant work experience outside of academia, so we'll see about that.

I'd say if you're considering MAPSS, go in knowing that it's a short program and that it is what you make of it. It's more difficult to make professors take notice of you because they know you'll be gone in less than a year. Much of what you study might be repeat from undergrad, and your thesis will likely not be taken seriously (and why should it after two to three months of research?).

OolongMilkTea

I created an account just to give my review of MAPSS, because I wanted to present a different and more positive perspective of the program. I just graduated as part of the 2017/18 cohort, and I am extremely thankful for the opportunities that the program has given me, and I can see that the program will be suitable for certain types of students. MAPSS is great for people who are serious about academia, and for those who aren't sure, the program is still great for you to decide whether academia is right for you. As many of MAPSS alumni will tell you, MAPSS will show you the worst of academia, and if you go through the program still having an interest in academia, then you know that academia is right for you ?

For background purposes, I entered the program straight from undergrad after failing to get into any PhD programs I applied for. I managed to complete the program in nine months, wrote a thesis which I was proud of and that I got an A+ for (my advisor encouraged me to publish it), and so far have heard back from two of top choices in this Fall 2019 PhD application cycle.

The Lows of the Program

- The program is extremely compressed, and it consists of three quarters plus a summer. This means that you have a month to do fieldwork of any kind during winter break, and you pretty much need to have an achievable project in mind when you enter the program. Writing thesis and doing coursework at the same time is  not  easy, but there are ways around it, including using coursework for research and as fodder for your thesis. I asked my professors for some of my classes if I could use the final papers to flesh out sections of my final thesis, so in the end I did not have to write out a completely separate thesis and received very helpful, timely feedback from the professors at the same time.

- People here have mentioned that some faculty members do not look kindly on MAPSS students. That is true, and you need to learn to avoid them by speaking to other graduate and PhD students in the department to figure out who you can best work with. Even after finding an advisor, you will have to manage the advisor's schedule in relation to yours, i.e. they will not spoon-feed you and treat you like an independent, adult graduate student. You will have to take the initiative to set up meetings with advisors, tell advisors specifically what you need, when you need it by, and remind them of the deadlines of your program.

- Some of the MAPSS courses are terrible and substandard. I actually liked Perspectives and found it useful, but the few data/methodology courses that I took were mostly garbage (why did I sign up for more than one I seriously have no idea), and you can avoid them by just signing up for courses by actual professors beyond the MAPSS department itself. 

- As OP mentioned, the grading system of Perspectives is weird, because they gave out many Bs in general to "scare" students into performing and working harder during the midterms, and then usually recalibrate after the finals. Don't be too frightened about Perspectives in general.

The Highs of the Program

- I actually really liked the people in my preceptor group. I found them very perspective, friendly, and hardworking. So I beg to differ from the general view that MAPSS students are inferior; far from it. MAPSS is an extremely large program comprising diverse people of different majors and expertise, so I don't think it is very fair to say "MAPSS students are X" when really there are so many people of different backgrounds in there. 

- If you know what you are doing and have an idea of what you plan to get out of a one year's master's program, MAPSS is great for you, and you can even save more money and time by completing your thesis and graduating earlier than 90% of the cohort in June, which is what I did. A master's degree in 9 months from an accredited institution, is simply just crazy.

- MAPSS also writes a glowing letter from the department which can take the place of a letter recommender when applying for PhD programs, which is immensely helpful because you then only really need to look for two more letters for your applications.

- MAPSS has its own fantastic career services office that give loads of personalized advice and workshops right from the start of the program, and you can still contact them for their help in job search after graduating. 

- Being given many opportunities to participate in academic conferences and engage with people within the department. The amount of exposure you get in MAPSS is actually pretty good, but you need to be able to source those opportunities out and also talk to people within the department. The PhD students are always your best resource, and I made a few great friends in the department who were able to help me revise my master's thesis and also help me edit my PhD application proposals. IMHO, they are better resources than the professors themselves, and I would not have done so well without all the relationships that I have forged in UChicago. For perspective, I only met my advisor in person twice outside of class for my thesis and had two email exchanges with him before I submitted my thesis, and most of the help I got was from the PhD students and other students in the MAPSS program.

- You get to take life-changing, mind-blowing classes taught by established professors in their fields. 'Nuff said.

***You should only apply to/accept an offer to MAPSS if you have:

i. Enough funds or funding. Financing a master's education, even for a year and partially funded, is very expensive. You will also need to have enough funds to last you through a gap year after MAPSS if you are set on academia (see point three below).

ii. You are interested in academia or pursuing academia. MAPSS is not designed to be a professional or a terminal degree, so it will be a waste of your time if you are simply planning to enter industry right after graduation. 

iii. You can afford the gap year after MAPSS. MAPSS is only one year, but you cannot apply for a PhD program (I mean you can, but the department will not support you when you are applying just months into MAPSS) during MAPSS, which means that you can only apply for the following cycle of PhD programs. This means that you WILL have a gap year after MAPSS, and you need to plan that into your schedule, such as taking up part-time or full time work to tide you through. 

Hope this helps!

purpleatheart1994

Thank you everyone for your thoughts. I have an undergrad from abroad. It's one of the leading universities in my country, but does not amount to much for me to enter the job market in the US (where I plan on working in the long term since I am a citizen). Is it really bad if I'm entering for: 1) the UofC label to help get me decent jobs after grad 2) to enter a professional field of communications or policy research after completing MAPSS? I plan on taking courses which are more quantitative to help achieve these goals.

@purpleatheart1994 MAPSS is really what you make of it. I had a not so great experience with the MAPSS career department when I was there and looking for jobs in 2012 (they were basically useless for my line of work), but I'm sure other people had better experiences. There is absolutely no guarantee you'll land a job after a liberal arts M.A., so if that's your goal I'd think hard about it. Since you're a U.S. citizen, though, you won't have any time constraints, which is positive.

11 hours ago, kandai said: @purpleatheart1994 MAPSS is really what you make of it. I had a not so great experience with the MAPSS career department when I was there and looking for jobs in 2012 (they were basically useless for my line of work), but I'm sure other people had better experiences. There is absolutely no guarantee you'll land a job after a liberal arts M.A., so if that's your goal I'd think hard about it. Since you're a U.S. citizen, though, you won't have any time constraints, which is positive.

Yikes. I assumed an American degree would help me enter the job market. I have a friend who did MAPSS just for this, but that was a few years ago. Things may have changed.

I don't mind other issues that others have flagged, like the program being repetitive of undergrad coursework. I don't think my undergrad abroad is comparable. Fingers crossed. I've gotten into a public policy program at a state college which is very reasonable and can definitely help me land a job. But UChicago has been my dream school. It's hard to wrap my head around the idea of choosing not to go. 

Don't take my word for it! There are many experiences out there. Just, getting a Master's in liberal arts doesn't really train you for any field in particular and employers know this for sure, and MAPSS is just 9 months. I'd suggest doing a two year program that will allow you to network more deeply, which is really how most people find jobs out of grad school as far as I can see. Just one person's opinion!

And if it's your dream school then go for it!

• 2 weeks later...

Thanks @kandai . I've been thinking about what you've said and found programs which will teach me more quantitative skills to enter the professional path after graduating

• 1 year later...

Masut Artan

Let me add few things about this MAPSS program.  I just applied to this program for no good reason other than being rejected to every phd program i have applied. So i tried to find out 1yr MA program from top university that can give me an opportunity to write a thesis , because i did not write thesis in my previous grad program at a public university. I chose Uchicago program over UCLA just because of generosity in funding at Uchicago. UCLa MA social science awards few fellowships or financial aid (they call it self-funding program).  coming to the Program, they have one bad “perspectives course” which is mandatory for all students, and it is designed to discourage students as most of them can’t manage to get more than B. Not because the course is challenging but because it is designed that way—infact its assignments is just 2-3page reflection paper or critique paper, but they just grade it that way, may be a policy!  MAPSS students are weird and are not outgoing or social in nature, they envy each other and compete, and they don’t  behave as mature people. most people avoid to take METHODS  courses but if u decide to take them, it is hell. Time is short, and instead of teaching math and statistics as the traditional way, they start challenging you from first day: so would you learn something new or would you meet with the deadlines and workout homeworks! Professors don’t care, they assume as though everyone is from Math or engineering background! TA are just machines, they don’t help and they dont offer any assistance, they are just like robots in virtual offices hours and instead of answering your concerns they just argue with you and send you to check the syllabus and read the books!   

Regardless of MAPSS program as social science field, you will be autonomous to take course at any department ( i took 70% of my course from Harris public policy school) and i took phd courses with political science students. That means the program will not restrict you to take set of courses. I felt very important as everyone else in the political science phd program and in the public policy department. I selected courses that i like. Only Linear Models Class challenged me as hell, not because i was poor in math (infact i was from engineering background) but because i was working alone —no friends no group work no body to share notes or feelings with me. I didn’t get any good person to work with. And it is very difficult to work alone!   

On 1/22/2021 at 8:53 PM, Masut Artan said: MAPSS students are weird and are not outgoing or social in nature, they envy each other and compete, and they don’t  behave as mature people.

I actually had very much the opposite experience. My cohort (2015-2016) was very convivial and really a diverse, lovely group of humans. I had moved away from Chicago and on moving back, found that I have a wonderful community of pockets of friends that are often intellectually curious/engaged but in all sectors of the workforce of Chicago. There are those that are hyper-competitive in MAPSS, esp that are desperate to get into PhD programs, but only about 1/3 of the students choose to try to continue on into a PhD program. Many choose to enter the workforce, and those that do are generally not hyper-competitive. I've written about my experience in a few places on here, but mine was generally really positive, though the program is perhaps not worth it. If you have a great scholarship or have no qualms about funding an incredibly expensive MA, then it's a rushed but really powerful experience. Also, if you're dead set to get into PhD programs but can't get into them, this is a program with really good support and placement of it's MA students. But if you don't have a good scholarship, and you're not desperate to find another qualification or support to get into PhD programs, I don't think it's worth the steep, steep cost of admission.

• 1 month later...

AnthroNomad

Hi, I've applied to the anthropology PhD track at UChicago and got rejected, but I recently received an offer to MAPSS with partial scholarship. I never really considered taking a separate MA track before entering PhD and I'm still unsure about the program. Does the MAPSS 1-year track offer enough time for field work? I wonder whether MAPSS students have enough time and resources to produce quality theses in 9 months and whether there are any decent scholarships for MA fieldwork.

The short answer is, no and no. You really have very little time to conduct fieldwork (depending on your discipline and interests) and there is very little funding available for conducting work. The best case scenario is to have an adviser, outside of MAPSS, that has their own research project that you could participate in. In some cases, you can actually receive funding from profs as a Research Assistant to conduct certain kinds of work/research. I actually received two different Research Assistantships--the first paid me well and I did almost nothing for it, and the second did NOT pay me well but got me access to the places and people that my thesis ended up being on. I would immediately reach out to professors you've been in touch with for the PhD program to ask about RA possibilities with them. You can potentially find some when you arrive, but if you're concerned about coming in with a project this is about the only way you can do this, to my mind.

• 4 months later...

I completed the MAPSS program several years ago, and would add that I think the program is perhaps helpful for those who have undergraduate degrees from universities outside of the United States and would like to pursue a PhD program in the United States. That said, I personally had a negative experience with the program and would caution others considering the program to think long and hard about their decision. Furthermore, even though the program does offer partial merit aid to many, it is still a pretty expensive program even with a tuition scholarship, not to mention the added expense of living in Chicago. Completing an MA through a doctoral program is free and comes with other forms of financial support through TA or RA work, which may be a better financial decision for many.

While I enjoyed the opportunity to take a wide range of courses throughout the university, I felt that MAPSS students were sometimes disadvantaged due to lack of familiarity with the university. Truthfully, one year is an extremely short time to become accustomed to a new university setting, find an advisor, and complete a thesis. I felt that the MAPSS program advisors offered limited support (perhaps in part because they each advisor about 20 students), and it was difficult to connect with a faculty member who would advise me on the thesis in such a limited period of time. Furthermore, many faculty members are extremely busy, and unfortunately I felt that my thesis advisor's schedule (and perhaps lack of investment in building a solid working relationship with an MA student), made it difficult for me to complete the thesis in the allocated time. I struggled to complete the thesis in such a short period of time, and felt that my advisor was not particularly understanding of the difficulties of working on such a tight schedule.

I ultimately pursued a doctoral degree after graduating from the MAPSS program, but I mainly relied on resources from my undergraduate professors and university, not the MAPSS program, when applying to doctoral programs. Though the MAPSS program does provide resources for those who are interested in applying to doctoral programs, it is important to realize that it is not easy to form great relationships with potential recommenders in such a short time. For me, I felt that my undergraduate experience was much more important and helpful when I applied to doctoral programs, and truthfully I regret my decision to participate in the MAPSS program.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Already have an account? Sign in here.

• Existing user? Sign In
• Online Users
• All Activity
• My Activity Streams
• Unread Content
• Content I Started
• Results Search
• Post Results
• Leaderboard
• Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

• Student Awards
• Graduate Study
• Programs Overview
• Graduate Student Resources
• Student Resources

2023-2024 Student Award Recipients

The Kenneth C. Griffin Department of Economics is proud to announce this year’s recipients of the Martin and Margaret Lee Prizes and Graduate Student Teaching awards, as well as two memorial Prizes: The Yiran Fan Memorial Prize and the George S. Tolley Prize. 

Econ-MA Thesis Awards

Parth Viatha MAPSS-Econ (BA/MA) "Conditional Covariance of Risky and Risk-Free Assets"

Joanne (Yongyin) Liang MAPSS-Econ "From the Ashes: Urban Reconstruction and Land Values after the Great Chicago Fire of 1871"

Lee Prize Award Winners

Aaron Leonard

From left to right: Jack Marshall, Shirui Chen, Daniil Iurchenko

Omkar Katta

Pictured from left to right: Deniz Dutz, Ashton Pallottini, Sofia Shchukina

The Yiran Fan Memorial Prize is a fellowship established in memory of late UChicago PhD student, Yiran Fan, which includes contributions from Fan’s parents and is awarded to a student in the Joint Program in Financial Economics.

It was established to commemorate Yiran Fan's kind and generous spirit and his devotion to bringing together fellow students, young researchers, and faculty as companions in learning. The prize is award by a student selection committee based on student nominations for the graduate student who made the greatest contribution to establishing and maintaining an open and nurturing learning environment for those with interests in economic dynamics, macroeconomics, or financial economics.

The recipient of the 2024 Yiran Fan Memorial Prize is Manav Chaudhary.

Past awardees are Marco Loseto (2023), Will Cassidy (2022, co-awardee), Aditya Chaudhry (2022, co-awardee), and Simon Oh (2021).

Manav Chaudhary

A donation made in honor of George S. Tolley will fund a $5000 prize for three years, beginning in 2021. The George S. Tolley Prize, initiated by economist Vinod Thomas (AM'74, PhD'77) is awarded to a student whose 3rd year doctoral research paper demonstrates the potential for the impact of economic analysis on policy. The prize is a special award bestowed over and above the awardee’s graduate funding package. It is conferred in the Fall Quarter of the winning student’s fourth year in the doctoral program. 

All rising fourth year students who have completed their third year research paper are eligible to apply. If you would like to be considered, please email your interest along with your third year research paper to Graduate Student Affairs Administrator, Kathryn Falzareno at [email protected]. The winner is selected by a faculty committee led by Mikhail Golosov, the Director of Graduate Studies, and will be announced at the annual Graduate Student/Faculty Lunch in November.

For "What Do Names Reveal? Impacts of Blind Evaluations on Composition and Quality” Haruka Uchida

Sofia Shchukina, a PhD student in the Kenneth C. Griffin Department of Economics, was awarded funding for the 2023-24 academic year as part of UChicagoGRAD's PhD Advance internship program for her work with NPR's Planet Money .

The PhD Advance program supports students in building new skills and applying their advanced-degree training in an area of professional interest in academia, industry, nonprofits, or government. The internships are student driven and engage students’ academic work. With coaching from UChicagoGRAD, PhD students create their own projects based on their specific interests and needs. They receive a $6,000 stipend for an internship lasting 300 hours.     The PhD Advance program prioritizes applicants who design customized, project-based internships. Project-based internships are those that engage the intern in a coherent set of responsibilities that progressively build toward a specific deliverable or outcome. Internships involving unrelated, ad-hoc tasks are not considered project-based opportunities. The program also gives preference to internship projects at organizations at which the applicant has no previous affiliation.

For more information about the program and to apply,  visit grad.uchicago.edu .

This Website Uses Cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

William Schulz wins the 2024 APSA ITP Best Dissertation Award as well as an honorable mention for the 2024 Thomas E. Patterson Best Dissertation Award

William Schulz's dissertation is titled, "Warped Words: How Online Speech Misrepresents Opinion."

Amaney Jamal has been awarded the 2024 Susanne Hoeber Rudolph Outstanding Scholar Award by the Religion and Politics section of the American Political Science Association

Claire Willeck has won the 2024 E. E. Schattschneider Award given by the American Political Science Association

Nancy Yun Tang wins the Kenneth Sherrill Prize given by the American Political Science Association

The Ohio State University

• BuckeyeLink
• Search Ohio State

Kassas named top navigation scholar in the world

Professor Zak Kassas , the TRC Endowed Chair in Intelligent Transportation Systems and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, has been ranked as the top scholar in the world in the field of  navigation  over the last five years, according to  ScholarGPS .

Highly Ranked Scholars™ are the most productive (number of publications) authors whose works are of profound impact (citations) and of utmost quality (h-index). The data used to identify the ScholarGPS Highly Ranked Scholars™ are based on lifetime or prior five-year activity, weighting each publication and citation by the number of authors, and excluding self-citations.

“It is an honor to be ranked among the most influential and respected scholars globally in my field,” said Kassas. “What makes this particularly thrilling is to see my former postdoc and PhD student Joe Khalife and PhD student Kimia Shamaei being ranked fifth and tenth, respectively,” added Kassas. “I consider this recognition to be for all members of the  ASPIN Lab ,  who believed in our research vision to address some of the most pressing problems of our time: enabling resilient, safe, and secure navigation anytime and anywhere.”

Kassas is a world-renowned expert in positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) in global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-challenged and GNSS-denied environments by exploiting terrestrial and non-terrestrial signals of opportunity (SOPs). He has made several breakthroughs proving that SOPs could be exploited for sustained, high-accuracy, real-world PNT, achieving the highest levels of accuracy ever published to date, including navigating  indoors , unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), ground vehicles in  GPS-jammed environments  and  high-altitude aircraft .

In addition, Kassas and his team were the first to ever exploit SpaceX’s Starlink low Earth orbit (LEO)  satellite signals for PNT  and the first to demonstrate  multi-constellation LEO-based  navigation without GNSS with Starlink, OneWeb, Orbcomm and Iridium satellites.

Kassas is a fellow of the IEEE and the Institute of Navigation (ION) and a distinguished lecturer of IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society. His awards include the National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award, Office of Naval Research (ONR) Young Investigator Program (YIP) award, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) YIP award, IEEE Walter Fried Award, ION Samuel Burka Award, ION Col. Thomas Thurlow Award, and IEEE Harry Rowe Mimno Award and 30+ best paper and paper presentation awards.

Kassas is the director of the Center for Automated Vehicles Research with Multimodal Assured Navigation ( CARMEN+ ), a U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Center (UTC) led by Ohio State that investigates PNT resiliency and accuracy of highly automated transportation systems.  The university was awarded $15 million in February 2023 for CARMEN+ ,  to expand upon work completed in the initial two-year CARMEN UTC, also led by Kassas.

Related News

Entomological Society of America elects UCR Professor as Fellow

For his outstanding contributions to the field, UCR Professor Chow-Yang Lee has been elected fellow of the Entomological Society of America, one of only four individuals nationwide to receive the honor this year. 

Founded in 1889, the society is the largest entomological organization in the world, with nearly 7,000 members. Fellows are nominated by peers and elected by the governing board of the society and will be recognized during the Entomological Society of America Annual Meeting this November in Phoenix, Arizona.

"I am truly honored to be elected as an ESA fellow,” Lee said. “This is the highest accolade the society can confer upon an entomologist, and I am humbled by the recognition from my peers for my contributions to urban entomology."

Lee, who serves as endowed presidential chair in the Urban Entomology Program, is internationally known for his research on the behavior, ecology, and physiological adaptations of urban insect pests, including cockroaches, bed bugs, termites, ants, and mosquitoes.

He seeks to understand the biological characteristics that help these urban pests thrive, and he works with graduate students to develop and test new pest management strategies. Their activities have included a focus on the insecticide resistance’s underlying mechanisms.

Lee has mentored numerous graduate students and postdoctoral researchers who have gone on faculty positions and leadership roles in the pest management industry. 

His outreach activities are extensive, having authored more than 290 peer-reviewed journal papers, book chapters, and books. Recently, he has co-authored several papers evaluating biodegradable boric acid gel baits meant to control Argentine ants, the potential use of an artificial sweetener against cockroaches and its impact on cockroach microbiome, and the effectiveness of new compound with a novel mode of action against cockroaches. 

He has also delivered over 240 invited presentations in more than 20 countries over the course of his career.

Born in Malacca, Malaysia, Lee conducted research on insecticide resistance in the German cockroach en route to the Ph.D. in insect toxicology he earned from the Universiti Sains Malaysia. He came to UCR in 2019.  

The list of accolades he has received includes the Entomological Society’s Recognition Award, the Mallis Distinguished Achievement Award from the National Conference on Urban Entomology, the Top Research Scientists Award from the Malaysian Academy of Science, and a Fulbright Scholarship from the U.S. Department of State.

To all aspiring young entomologists, he advised: "Find and pursue your passion, and everything else will follow. Passion is the key ingredient for sustaining a lifelong career. It will also drive you to wake up early and looking forward to going to the lab or office every morning."

Related Awards

Ca honey queen is a ucr entomology graduate student, ucr soil researcher wins outstanding dissertation award, ucr bioengineering professor becomes aimbe fellow, ucr chemist timothy su joins 2024 class of cottrell scholars.

• MAPSS Alumni

Recent Graduates

Julianne Downing, a recent graduate of the Master of Arts Program in Social Sciences, discusses her studies, her UChicago experience, and her favorite aspects of being a MAPSS student.

Julianne recently connected with Audrey Weckwerth, a rising 4th year and SSD Communications intern. These are excerpts from their exchange:

MAPSS at UChicago is my second master’s degree, my first was a Master of Science in Higher Education from the University of Oxford, in England. I went to the University of Notre Dame for undergrad (go Irish!) where I studied American studies and peace studies.

My MA thesis this year is titled: “Consolidating Control: Recent Republican Anti-Democratic Strategies in Higher Education.” It examines the ways right-wing actors are infiltrating college campuses in the United States as part of a larger project to control election outcomes, control courts, and ultimately control the country. Since this is such a massive partisan phenomenon, my research is intentionally exemplary and not exhaustive. I focus on just three instances—voter suppression at Spelman College, academic freedom at UChicago, and civic education at Occidental College.

My data comes from primary source analyses. Because the topic is so contemporary, many of these sources are no more than ten years old—I think my most recent citation was a Supreme Court case which began in February 2024. I would largely group my sources into five types: periodicals, legislative/judicial sources, official university statements, educational resources, and published primary sources.

• Periodicals include higher education trade journals (like Inside Higher Ed, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Times Higher Ed), opinion pieces and op-eds (including from the online Democracy Journal, the LA Times, and Twitter threads), and student journalism (like The Chicago Maroon).
• Legislative and judicial sources include close readings of laws (like a voter identification law from Georgia, GA Code § 21-2-417) and Supreme Court rulings (especially Shelby County v. Holder)—this area also includes data collected by pro-democracy watchdog groups, like the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, Tufts CIRCLE (the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement), or the global democracy index from the Global State of Democracy Initiative.
• Official university statements or presidential statements include letters from President Mary Campbell Schmidt to the students at Spelman College, online webpages/resources from the office of Student Leadership, Involvement, and Community Engagement (SLICE) at Occidental College, and the “Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression” at UChicago.
• Educational resources primarily come from Project Pericles and iCivics, two civic education nonprofits.
• Published primary sources include foundational texts to the field of [higher] education, like John Dewey’s Democracy and Education (1916), Hanna Holborn Gray’s Searching for Utopia (2011), Clark Kerr’s The Uses of the University (1963), and John Henry Newman and Frank M. Turner’s The Idea of a University (1852).

I began my research with extensive background reading of secondary sources which sit at the intersection of higher education and democracy. Beginning questions were why is higher education an important player in the pro-democracy movement of the 2020s? How are higher education institutions meeting or failing to meet their imperatives to protect American democracy? Why are Republicans so keen on invading this space?

After completing my review of the literature, I turned to these primary sources to start close readings and to look for patterns across my three chosen areas (college student voter suppression, the way academic freedom has been dragged into the culture wars, and civic education).

Here in MAPSS, we are working in diverse disciplines, and some of us are doing interdisciplinary projects. Just being surrounded by different kinds of thinking and ways of knowing stimulates everyone’s creativity and broadens our horizons.

I am also a Graduate Student Affiliate at the Chicago Center on Democracy. This is an on-campus research community of undergraduate and graduate students, faculty members, and other organizations who are working on non-partisan, pro-democracy topics.

Outside of life as a grad student, I am a volunteer writing coach with the national project Write to Vote. We are also a non-partisan, pro-democracy group, and we work to help undergraduates across the country author op-eds on democracy and voting rights broadly construed. (If you’re writing with us, you might write about a local proposition to protect parks, or your experiences as a young voter, or why your state constitution should be amended, etc.) The goal is to teach students the skills they need to compose opinion pieces, and then submit them to local papers or any other publication outlet related to their topic. We are currently in the middle of a three-month/three-session Zoom series with fifty students from all across the US (and we have two international students right now!) who are each writing on a topic related to voting rights that they are passionate about.

I have two favorite parts of MAPSS: (1) the choose-your-own-adventure style of the coursework, and (2) my peers.

The design of the program means that outside of one required Perspectives in Social Sciences course and one methods course (which you still get to choose what KIND of methods), all your coursework is up to you! That’s seven course slots you can fill with whatever interests you, supports your research topic, or teaches you practical skills like language or coding. That wide menu of coursework opportunities is a unique feature of our program, and it encourages each student to build their own version of the program that meets their academic interests and sets them up for whatever’s coming next—be that a doctoral program, a career, a creative venture, or a year of service.

My peers are easily the best part of MAPSS. It was immensely easy to make friends and bond over a shared love of niche research interests, and the realities of being adult nerds in Chicago. In such an interdisciplinary and diverse program, you frequently meet students from fields of study that you have probably never taken coursework in yourself—that makes friendships and conversations in class (or at Jimmy’s) very exciting! Most master’s programs, including my last program, are very narrow disciplinarily speaking, so all your peers are taking similar classes and working within similar boundaries. Here in MAPSS, we are working in diverse disciplines, and some of us are doing interdisciplinary projects. Just being surrounded by different kinds of thinking and ways of knowing stimulates everyone’s creativity and broadens our horizons.

This Website Uses Cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

Programs of Study

• General Curriculum
• Areas of Concentration
• Graduate Certificates
• BA/MA Program for UChicago Undergraduates

The Master of Arts Program in Social Sciences (MAPSS) is a one-year degree that prepares students planning for further doctoral studies or a career in a myriad of industries and organizations. Through 9 courses and a thesis project, students can focus on a specific social scientific discipline or pursue interdisciplinary interests. Students are guided by instructional staff (the “preceptor”) whose academic expertise is in their field of study or a related one. Regardless of the path chosen, MAPSS students engage with faculty and graduate students across departments, committees, and centers as well as the broader UChicago community.

While all students pursue an individualized course of study, they are generally grouped by similar interests or programs of study:

• Anthropology
• Comparative Human Development
• Conceptual and Historical Studies of Science
• Economics (specialized STEM-eligible program of study*)
• Gender Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Political Economy
• Political Science**
• Psychology (specialized STEM-eligible program of study*)
• Quantitative Methods and Social Analysis (specialized STEM-eligible program of study*)
• Social Thought

*Specialized programs of study have specific course or degree requirements. Admission to these programs of study is competitive, and students are notified at admission if they are selected for them. These areas of study are listed as a STEM designated degree by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for the purposes of the STEM OPT extension allowing eligible students to apply. However, approval for STEM OPT is at the discretion of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services .

**Political Science areas within MAPSS include American Politics, Comparative Politics, and Political Theory. Individuals interested in International Relations are recommended to apply to the Committee on International Relations one-year MA program.

Learn more about our program areas.

This Website Uses Cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.