essay peer review checklist

• Peer Review Checklist

Each essay is made up of multiple parts. In order to have a strong essay each part must be logical and effective. In many cases essays will be written with a strong thesis, but the rest of the paper will be lacking; making the paper ineffective. An essay is only as strong as its weakest point.

Using a checklist to complete your review will allow you to rate each of the parts in the paper according to their strength. There are many different peer review checklists, but the one below should be helpful for your assignment.

• Is the thesis clear?
• Does the author use his or her own ideas in the thesis and argument?
• Is the significance of the problem in the paper explained? Is the significance compelling?
• Are the ideas developed logically and thoroughly?
• Does the author use ethos effectively?
• Does the author use pathos effectively?
• Are different viewpoints acknowledged?
• Are objections effectively handled?
• Does the author give adequate explanations about sources used?
• Are the sources well-integrated into the paper, or do they seem to be added in just for the sake of adding sources?
• Is the word choice specific, concrete and interesting?
• Are the sentences clear?
• Is the overall organization of the argument effective?
• Are the transitions between paragraphs smooth?
• Are there any grammatical errors?

Based on the rubric found at: Grading Rubric Template (Word)

• Authored by : J. Indigo Eriksen. Provided by : Blue Ridge Community College. License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Image of checklist. Authored by : Jurgen Appelo. Located at : https://flic.kr/p/hykfe7 . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Peer Review Checklist. Authored by : Robin Parent. Provided by : Utah State University English Department. Project : USU Open CourseWare Initiative. License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Table of Contents

Instructor Resources (Access Requires Login)

• Overview of Instructor Resources

An Overview of the Writing Process

• Introduction to the Writing Process
• Introduction to Writing
• Your Role as a Learner
• What is an Essay?
• Reading to Write
• Defining the Writing Process
• Videos: Prewriting Techniques
• Thesis Statements
• Organizing an Essay
• Creating Paragraphs
• Conclusions
• Editing and Proofreading
• Matters of Grammar, Mechanics, and Style
• Comparative Chart of Writing Strategies

Using Sources

• Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Formatting the Works Cited Page (MLA)
• Citing Paraphrases and Summaries (APA)
• APA Citation Style, 6th edition: General Style Guidelines

Definition Essay

• Definitional Argument Essay
• How to Write a Definition Essay
• Critical Thinking
• Video: Thesis Explained
• Effective Thesis Statements
• Student Sample: Definition Essay

Narrative Essay

• Introduction to Narrative Essay
• Student Sample: Narrative Essay
• "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell
• "Sixty-nine Cents" by Gary Shteyngart
• Video: The Danger of a Single Story
• How to Write an Annotation
• How to Write a Summary
• Writing for Success: Narration

Illustration/Example Essay

• Introduction to Illustration/Example Essay
• "She's Your Basic L.O.L. in N.A.D" by Perri Klass
• "April & Paris" by David Sedaris
• Writing for Success: Illustration/Example
• Student Sample: Illustration/Example Essay

Compare/Contrast Essay

• Introduction to Compare/Contrast Essay
• "Disability" by Nancy Mairs
• "Friending, Ancient or Otherwise" by Alex Wright
• "A South African Storm" by Allison Howard
• Writing for Success: Compare/Contrast
• Student Sample: Compare/Contrast Essay

Cause-and-Effect Essay

• Introduction to Cause-and-Effect Essay
• "Cultural Baggage" by Barbara Ehrenreich
• "Women in Science" by K.C. Cole
• Writing for Success: Cause and Effect
• Student Sample: Cause-and-Effect Essay

Argument Essay

• Introduction to Argument Essay
• Rogerian Argument
• "The Case Against Torture," by Alisa Soloman
• "The Case for Torture" by Michael Levin
• How to Write a Summary by Paraphrasing Source Material
• Writing for Success: Argument
• Student Sample: Argument Essay
• Grammar/Mechanics Mini-lessons
• Mini-lesson: Subjects and Verbs, Irregular Verbs, Subject Verb Agreement
• Mini-lesson: Sentence Types
• Mini-lesson: Fragments I
• Mini-lesson: Run-ons and Comma Splices I
• Mini-lesson: Comma Usage
• Mini-lesson: Parallelism
• Mini-lesson: The Apostrophe
• Mini-lesson: Capital Letters
• Grammar Practice - Interactive Quizzes
• De Copia - Demonstration of the Variety of Language
• Style Exercise: Voice

Peer-Review Checklist for Draft of Argument Essay

Read the essay through, quickly. Then read it again, with the following questions in mind. Please write extensive comments either on your workshop partner's draft where applicable or on this handout. If you need more room, continue writing on the back of this page.

• Does this draft respond to the assignment? (Argument of a debatable issue with Rogerian slant?)
• Looking at the essay as whole, what thesis (main point including writer's opinion) is advanced? Please underline the thesis on your workshop partner's draft. If it is implied only, jot down what you perceive to be the thesis here.
• Are the needs of the audience kept in mind? For instance, do some concepts or words need to be defined? Is the evidence (examples, testimony of authorities, personal observations) clear and effective? Get into the margins of the draft and comment.
• Is any obvious evidence (or counter-evidence) overlooked?
• Can you accept the writer's assumptions? If not, why not? Please be honest and specific.
• What is the basic point?
• How does each paragraph relate to the essay's main idea or the previous paragraph?
• Should some paragraphs be deleted? Be divided into two or more paragraphs? Be combined? Be put elsewhere? (If you outline the essay by jolting down the gist of each paragraph, you will get help in answering these questions.)
• Is each sentence clearly related to the sentence that precedes it and to the sentence that follows?
• Is each paragraph adequately developed? Are there sufficient details, perhaps brief quotations or paraphrases from credible sources?
• Are the introductory and concluding paragraphs effective?
• What are the paper's main strengths?
• Make at least one specific suggestion that you think will assist the author to improve the paper.
• Last but not least--mechanics. If time permits, point out errors in spelling or grammar that distract from the argument of this draft.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

18 Peer Review Checklist

Each essay is made up of multiple parts. In order to have a strong essay each part must be logical and effective. In many cases essays will be written with a strong thesis, but the rest of the paper will be lacking; making the paper ineffective. An essay is only as strong as its weakest point.

Using a checklist to complete your review will allow you to rate each of the parts in the paper according to their strength. There are many different peer review checklists, but the one below should be helpful for your assignment.

• Is the thesis clear?
• Does the author use his or her own ideas in the thesis and argument?
• Is the significance of the problem in the paper explained? Is the significance compelling?
• Are the ideas developed logically and thoroughly?
• Does the author use ethos effectively?
• Does the author use pathos effectively?
• Are different viewpoints acknowledged?
• Are objections effectively handled?
• Does the author give adequate explanations about sources used?
• Are the sources well-integrated into the paper, or do they seem to be added in just for the sake of adding sources?
• Is the word choice specific, concrete and interesting?
• Are the sentences clear?
• Is the overall organization of the argument effective?
• Are the transitions between paragraphs smooth?
• Are there any grammatical errors?

Based on the rubric found at: Grading Rubric Template (Word)

Enhanced College Writing Copyright © 2014 by Lumen Learning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

English Current

ESL Lesson Plans, Tests, & Ideas

• North American Idioms
• Business Idioms
• Idioms Quiz
• Idiom Requests
• Proverbs Quiz & List
• Phrasal Verbs Quiz
• Basic Phrasal Verbs
• North American Idioms App
• A(n)/The: Help Understanding Articles
• The First & Second Conditional
• The Difference between 'So' & 'Too'
• The Difference between 'a few/few/a little/little'
• The Difference between "Other" & "Another"
• Check Your Level
• English Vocabulary
• Verb Tenses (Intermediate)
• Articles (A, An, The) Exercises
• Prepositions Exercises
• Irregular Verb Exercises
• Gerunds & Infinitives Exercises
• Discussion Questions
• Speech Topics
• Argumentative Essay Topics
• Top-rated Lessons
• Intermediate
• Upper-Intermediate
• Reading Lessons
• View Topic List
• Expressions for Everyday Situations
• Travel Agency Activity
• Present Progressive with Mr. Bean
• Work-related Idioms
• Adjectives to Describe Employees
• Writing for Tone, Tact, and Diplomacy
• Speaking Tactfully
• Advice on Monetizing an ESL Website
• Teaching your First Conversation Class
• How to Teach English Conversation
• Teaching Different Levels
• Teaching Grammar in Conversation Class
• Members' Home
• Update Billing Info.
• Cancel Subscription
• North American Proverbs Quiz & List
• North American Idioms Quiz
• Idioms App (Android)
• 'Be used to'" / 'Use to' / 'Get used to'
• Ergative Verbs and the Passive Voice
• Keywords & Verb Tense Exercises
• Irregular Verb List & Exercises
• Non-Progressive (State) Verbs
• Present Perfect vs. Past Simple
• Present Simple vs. Present Progressive
• Past Perfect vs. Past Simple
• Subject Verb Agreement
• The Passive Voice
• Subject & Object Relative Pronouns
• Relative Pronouns Where/When/Whose
• Commas in Adjective Clauses
• A/An and Word Sounds
• 'The' with Names of Places
• Understanding English Articles
• Article Exercises (All Levels)
• Yes/No Questions
• Wh-Questions
• How far vs. How long
• Affect vs. Effect
• A few vs. few / a little vs. little
• Boring vs. Bored
• Compliment vs. Complement
• Die vs. Dead vs. Death
• Expect vs. Suspect
• Experiences vs. Experience
• Go home vs. Go to home
• Had better vs. have to/must
• Have to vs. Have got to
• I.e. vs. E.g.
• In accordance with vs. According to
• Lay vs. Lie
• Make vs. Do
• In the meantime vs. Meanwhile
• Need vs. Require
• Notice vs. Note
• 'Other' vs 'Another'
• Pain vs. Painful vs. In Pain
• Raise vs. Rise
• So vs. Such
• So vs. So that
• Some vs. Some of / Most vs. Most of
• Sometimes vs. Sometime
• Too vs. Either vs. Neither
• Weary vs. Wary
• Who vs. Whom
• While vs. During
• While vs. When
• Wish vs. Hope
• 10 Common Writing Mistakes
• 34 Common English Mistakes
• First & Second Conditionals
• Comparative & Superlative Adjectives
• Determiners: This/That/These/Those
• Check Your English Level
• Grammar Quiz (Advanced)
• Vocabulary Test - Multiple Questions
• Vocabulary Quiz - Choose the Word
• Verb Tense Review (Intermediate)
• Verb Tense Exercises (All Levels)
• Conjunction Exercises
• List of Topics
• Business English
• Games for the ESL Classroom
• Pronunciation
• Teaching Your First Conversation Class
• How to Teach English Conversation Class

Argumentative Essay Peer-Editing Checklist

I use the below checklist with my students so they can improve the drafts of their argumentative essays . Feel free to use it (or edit it as long as you don't redistribute it) if you find it useful for your class.  Note that there are APA-related questions.

There are two pages. The first page is for the prepared students who brought an essay draft to class to show their partners. The second page is for unprepared students who only have their essay in their heads (it's a verbal exercise). If your students are all prepared, then you can disregard the second page.

Peer-review Checklist Preview

Argumentative Essay Draft Peer-Editing Checklist

Pair-work : Answer the below questions based on your partner’s essay.

• The essay has a clear thesis statement presenting its stance at the end of the introduction paragraph. (YES/NO) If YES, write the essay’s thesis statement below:
• The essay presents a counter-argument to the author’s stance. (YES/NO) If YES, write the counter-argument points below:
• Can you easily find a refutation or response to each of the above points?

Point A: (YES/NO)

Point B: (YES/NO)

(Point C: (YES/NO))

• If YES, is the refutation persuasive? (YES/Somewhat/No)
• Does the essay ignore any obvious counter-arguments? (YES/NO) (Answer should be NO)
• Do the regular body paragraphs begin with a clear topic sentence that states the overall topic of the paragraph? (Example topic sentence: “ Furthermore, outsourcing can reduce company costs .” < If this were the topic sentence, then the whole paragraph would be about reducing costs.) (YES/NO)
• Does each paragraph have at least three sentences? (YES/NO)

If time allows…

• Does each in-text citation contain the author’s last name and the year of publication? (YES/NO)
• Count the number of authors cited. Do all of these authors appear in the References? (YES/NO)
• Are there any non-cited authors in the References? (YES/NO) (Answer should be NO)
• Are the References entries listed in alphabetical order?
• Do all sources accessed online have a DOI or URL?
• Are the sentences clear? Highlight the sentences you don’t understand.

Research Essay Worksheet – Verbal Explanation (Essay draft not Ready)

Part 1 (Pair Work) : Stance, Counter-argument, and Refutation

Present the below points to your partner about your essay. You do not need to write anything–explain it as clearly as possible verbally.

Stance/Thesis

• My essay argues that ….

Counter-argument

• Critics of this view argue that (1) ….
• Some people also might argue that (2) ….

Refutation/Response

• Point #1 is not (completely) true because ….
• Point #2 is not (completely) true because ….

Part 2 : Once finished, give feedback to each other. Consider the following points:

• Are the most obvious counter-arguments mentioned?
• Does the refutation address the specific points of the counter-argument?
• Is the refutation convincing

Part 3 : (Time Permitting) Verification of peer-reviewed sources

Paste a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources that you plan to use below.

Confirm with your partner that these sources are peer-reviewed, i.e. journal articles or published books.

Best of luck with your classes.

-- Peer-editing worksheet created by Matthew Barton (copyright) for Englishcurrent.com

EnglishCurrent is happily hosted on Dreamhost . If you found this page helpful, consider a donation to our hosting bill to show your support!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Module 1: An Overview of the Writing Process

Peer review checklist.

Each essay is made up of multiple parts. In order to have a strong essay each part must be logical and effective. In many cases essays will be written with a strong thesis, but the rest of the paper will be lacking; making the paper ineffective. An essay is only as strong as its weakest point.

Using a checklist to complete your review will allow you to rate each of the parts in the paper according to their strength. There are many different peer review checklists, but the one below should be helpful for your assignment.

• Is the thesis clear?
• Does the author use his or her own ideas in the thesis and argument?
• Is the significance of the problem in the paper explained? Is the significance compelling?
• Are the ideas developed logically and thoroughly?
• Does the author use ethos effectively?
• Does the author use pathos effectively?
• Are different viewpoints acknowledged?
• Are objections effectively handled?
• Does the author give adequate explanations about sources used?
• Are the sources well-integrated into the paper, or do they seem to be added in just for the sake of adding sources?
• Is the word choice specific, concrete and interesting?
• Are the sentences clear?
• Is the overall organization of the argument effective?
• Are the transitions between paragraphs smooth?
• Are there any grammatical errors?

Based on the rubric found at: Grading Rubric Template (Word)

• Authored by : J. Indigo Eriksen. Provided by : Blue Ridge Community College. License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Image of checklist. Authored by : Jurgen Appelo. Located at : https://flic.kr/p/hykfe7 . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Peer Review Checklist. Authored by : Robin Parent. Provided by : Utah State University English Department. Project : USU Open CourseWare Initiative. License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike

• About NuWrite
• Writing Advice
• Engineering & Design
• General writing advice
• Academic integrity and avoiding plagiarism (Northwestern WCAS)
• Grammar and punctuation
• Analytical writing
• Research papers
• Graphics and visuals
• Conferences
• Peer editing sheets for drafts
• Peer feedback form literature seminar
• Peer review Asian diaspora freshman seminar
• Research draft peer review
• Research paper introduction peer response
• Research paper peer evaluation of claims
• Peer editing science papers
• Getting the most out of peer reviews
• Peer review guidelines for a personal essay
• Writing assignments
• Freshman seminar award essays
• Useful links with writing advice
• Grading criteria
• Global Health
• Writing in the Humanities
• Science Writing
• Social Science Writing
• Writing for Graduate or Professional School
• Writing Advice for International Students
• Faculty-Only Resources

Peer editing

Peer editing can be done during class time or electronically outside of class, as the documents below--from Northwestern instructors--illustrate.  The questions that students respond to can vary according to the nature of the assignment and the purpose of the peer review.

peer editing sheets for drafts Peer editing sheets for two essay assignments in a freshman seminar.  Providing very specific questions helps the editors give useful feedback and suggestions. 

peer feedback form literature seminar Students exchange drafts in class, complete the peer feedback form, and then discuss their written comments with one another.  Students submit the forms with their drafts so that I can read them.  I frequently refer to their peers' comments when I am writing my own comments on their drafts.   

peer review Asian diaspora freshman seminar Students do a close reading of one another's drafts to provide insight into what has and has not been conveyed by the draft.

research draft peer review Prompts peer reviewers to comment on key pieces of information, logical organization, and conclusion

research paper introduction peer response Prompts peer editor to comment on introduction, and prompts author to respond to those comments

research paper peer evaluation of claims Prompts peer editor to evaluate the paper's effectiveness in supporting claims and addressing counter-arguments

peer editing science papers Prompts peer editor to complete a checklist on the paper's content, structure, and grammar

getting the most out of peer reviews A link to NU's Writing Place that explains how to make sure you benefit from sharing your writing with peers

peer review guidelines for a personal essay These guidelines from a freshman seminar are aimed at pairs of students who are exchanging drafts before meeting individually with the instructor. 

• Contact Northwestern University
• Campus Emergency Information
• University Policies

Northwestern University Library | 1970 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-2300 |  Phone: 847.491.7658  |  Fax: 847.491.8306  |  Email: [email protected]

Beyond the checklist: Centering peer review and feedback

By completing this form, you agree to Turnitin's Privacy Policy . Turnitin uses the information you provide to contact you with relevant information. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time.

As a former K12 English Language Arts educator, this blog is both an apology and a love letter to former students. How so? As I write this, I am reminded of me as a much younger, much less experienced classroom educator. I apologize for asking for revisions that amounted to nothing more than a “sloppy copy” and a “neat copy.” This may be a decent starting point, but this blog presents proof that it is possible to learn and grow; the Peer Review and Feedback instructional resource pack provides resources for educators and students who may have varying levels of experience with this process.

Writing–whether as a student or adult–is a complex process that requires the right mix of solitude and community. This is especially true for younger writers as they seek to find a voice and hone their craft. While many stages of writing can be both profoundly difficult and profoundly satisfying, seeking and receiving feedback can be one of the more challenging aspects of the writing process, no matter the skill level of the writer.

Why is this a common problem for both adult and student writers? Obviously the process is complex. When writers process their thoughts and begin to put them on the page, there’s definitely a satisfaction to be found, yet who hasn’t felt frustration as well when attempting to perfect their thoughts? Peer review and feedback are critical steps when completing any project so why does it elicit such dread from teachers and students?

In this blog post, we'll explore the challenges associated with peer review and feedback head-on and uncover strategies to transform them into powerful tools for development and collaboration, paving the way for a transformative writing experience.

How do time constraints impact the quality of peer review and feedback?

Lack of time can lead to less time devoted to review and feedback.

Time is often at a premium and may lead to less time devoted to this stage of the writing process. Educators may skimp on both ends of this process: at the beginning when students should learn what quality feedback is and be taught how to give and receive it, and also later in the process when they apply that knowledge to their peers’ projects. It is important to note that good feedback encourages multiple revisions and drafts and doesn’t just happen between the “sloppy copy” and the “neat copy.”

Solution: Invest time in teaching feedback

First, time is always an issue in the classroom. Few of us have adequate time to feel as if we’ve done enough to aid students. Take. The. Time. Time is a commodity like any other. Invest time in teaching students the why, what, and how of timely, actionable feedback , and their comfort and skill will grow as a result. Time used in this way will benefit students in both the long and short term, as well as helping educators.

The good news is that there are tools and resources that are available to help teachers and students do this more effectively. Modeling is definitely a friend when it comes to feedback. Use an essay that already has a rubric score to save the time of culling student examples and ensuring the writer is anonymous. Search for a topic that is sure to be a hit with students, or use one of these exemplar essays that already has a rubric score and annotations, divided by genre and grade level. Not only has a lot of the work already been established, there are discussion points regarding what kind of feedback to give and what/how the writer can do in response to that feedback.

Move on from whole class discussions to providing essays with feedback to students in small groups and have them evaluate the intent and purpose of the specific feedback examples and how a writer could/should respond to that feedback. Make sure that students come back to the whole group to discuss and reinforce best practices.

These activities are lengthy in terms of laying the foundation for giving and receiving feedback. Too often we skimp on these important foundational skills and then wonder why students don’t understand how or even why it’s important. Teaching students how to give feedback to one another increases their independence and skill level as writers because examining others’ work helps them to critically evaluate their own. Ultimately, this increase in student skill and confidence will lead to less demand for only the educator’s feedback as they learn to trust in the writer’s community being created.

How can a lack of knowledge result in poor peer review and feedback?

Too often our students aren’t strong enough writers to feel confident in giving any but the most superficial feedback. They may stray into the area of proofreading or editing for errors due to a lack of understanding of an assignment, writing skills, or a clear purpose for the feedback cycle. Many times students are handed a checklist and given free rein to read and review; and why not? These are far simpler and measurable ways to approach text, unlike quality feedback. There is nothing wrong with a good checklist to keep peer reviewers focused, but the specificity of a rubric is more likely to determine the quality of feedback. If all that is required of students is a proofreading task or asking/answering yes or no questions without an opportunity to reflect, then the quality of feedback will suffer.

Solution: Teach and model effective responses

Step one: Understanding the writing skills required to complete the assignment is necessary for both the educator and the student. Taking the time to identify and then teach discrete skills that allow students to experience their own expertise is key. No checklist or rubric can help a student who lacks the requisite skills. The educator’s expectations for feedback must be explicit, and they must be taught to students. Starting with one key writing skill, modeling it, and allowing students to learn without penalty at this stage is necessary. Educators should expect to provide feedback on their students’ feedback!

Step two: Acknowledging that modeling feedback skills may not necessarily mean that students can do this work immediately. Superficial understanding leads to superficial feedback. Writers should have an explicit direction to take as a result of feedback. Ideally, this should include “Where to Next?” feedback , which identifies an issue related to the writing task, relevance to the stated expectations of the assignment, and specific action(s) to guide the student in their “next steps.” This takes understanding and a commitment on the part of the educator, who may be a novice in providing this type of feedback. Still, one of the best ways to learn something deeply and meaningfully is application; in this case, teaching these skills to students as a regular element of the feedback loop is key to developing the educator’s own understanding.

How do educator comfort and skills lead to disconnects in the peer review and feedback process?

Lack of comfort on the part of educators who may not possess the needed skills themselves can lead to a disconnect and devaluation of the process. Often–although not always–providing actionable feedback isn’t taught explicitly due to the teacher’s discomfort with the process. It is uncomfortable and difficult to teach what is unfamiliar. Some teachers aren’t trained in best practices for teaching writing and so may not have the information or skills to share with others. Inherent in this process is the recursive feedback cycle. Often this is reduced to a list of items where little critical skill is required and possibly worse, just being a cheerleader who isn’t offering constructive, actionable feedback.

As a young student, I was often the victim of non-helpful feedback; marks like awk or comma splice were liberally sprinkled over my written offerings. If I had known what that meant, I wouldn’t have included all 20 comma splices! And sadly, I wasn’t comfortable asking.

Solution: Embrace feedback loops for deeper learning

The good news is that there is good practice in how to give and receive feedback. It requires some change in educator and student practice, but it’s there! As with so many changes, it requires a shift in thinking that must be acknowledged, embraced, and practiced. It is far too easy to write pithy little comments because they are A) easier to write and B) sometimes it seems that students only look at the grade and not the feedback.

Two things of note: first, one of the biggest issues with what I mentioned above is that if the feedback is given with a grade, it’s too late to apply the feedback! There is no opportunity for change and therefore it quite literally is of little use to the student. Two, feedback loops are absolutely needed. Feedback must be formative in nature in order to have an impact and absolutely must be paired with the opportunity to revise and submit again. But receiving feedback and revising and submitting isn’t quite the loop I’m envisioning. A student response needs to be more than just a resubmission with a few modifications. A feedback loop may include that type of response, but it is also an opportunity for dialogue wherein students can ask for clarification and further input from the educator.

Open, trusting communication involves active participation with a willingness to both offer something and to receive it as well as a willingness to suspend ego and work hard to improve.

How does a lack of confidence in peers hinder the peer review and feedback process?

Lack of confidence in peers leads to seeking feedback from the educator(s) in the classroom only.

Too often students are savvy enough to recognize that much of the feedback they receive from peers isn’t going to help them improve their writing skills as well as that of the educator. Educators can only do so much so it isn’t feasible to expect that the educator can provide timely feedback on multiple drafts for multiple students. In addition, no one likes hearing or reading what they have failed to do well. Too often reviewers are either not knowledgeable enough to help the writer, or often the tone is too harsh and appears more critical than helpful.

Solution: Model, practice, and build confidence in peers

It seems inevitable that when educators assign peer review, there will be several students who only want feedback from the “real” expert in the room: the one who is assigning grades at the end. If only they can suss out what that educator wants, they can maybe deliver it and have that high mark to prove it! This transition will take time and patience and lots of practice from all participants.

Establish clear expectations and practice, practice, practice.

1. Model for them what it looks like–and show what it doesn’t look like.

2. Model for them how to give and receive feedback because there’s an art to both sides of this transaction.

3. Model for them how to give feedback on the strengths of the assignment, as well as the weak areas.

4. Model for them how to respond to feedback.

Start with small, yet important revisions and help students to become the experts that they need.

What are the benefits of a student checklist in peer review and feedback?

Checklists are the gateway to revision and editing, right? Checklists have advantages and disadvantages as do all tools. That last part is important enough to repeat: a checklist is a tool. Many tools are ineffective when used incorrectly or in the wrong context. A checklist has a place in this process, but it’s only a part, not the whole. And its usefulness is dependent on what’s included in it. Checklists can offer a way to complete the task so it should be focused, able to be implemented at multiple times during the feedback cycle, and should require more of a response than a yes/no or a check mark. And, yes, this takes time too.

Overview: Centering peer review and feedback

The challenges are obvious to experienced educators, but even when the solutions are as clear as the challenges, often time constraints make it difficult to implement effective and impactful peer review and feedback. The bottom line is that we, as educators, need to work with students to improve their skills and confidence in themselves and each other when offering and receiving feedback. Centering students in this process and helping them develop the skill set necessary to offer timely feedback is essential in knowing how to look critically at their own writing.

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.