notice of assignment of insurance

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Insurance Policy Assignment Provisions: What They Are and When Insurers Have to Consent

Many policyholders forget that their insurance policy is a contract and is subject, with exceptions, to the usual laws of contract. An issue that frequently arises is whether the named insured is able to assign insurance proceeds under the policy to another. The answer to that question is dependent on the type of coverage sought.

What Is an Assignment Provision?

An assignment provision is a contractual clause that allows the policyholder to transfer their rights and obligations under the policy to another party. Assignment provisions enable things like transferring property insurance from one homeowner to another in case of a sale or assigning a life insurance policy to a beneficiary as a gift. Assignment provisions also allow business insurance to be assigned as part of a merger.

Can I Assign My Insurance Policy Without the Insurer’s Consent?

You cannot assign an insurance policy without the insurer’s consent before a loss has occurred. Because insurance policies are a contract, each party must consent to the terms of the contract. In fact, most insurance policies have a “consent to assignment clause” that typically provides that: “Assignment of interest under this policy shall not bind the Company until its consent is endorsed hereon.” 1 This clause is designed to protect the insurer from having to extend coverage to an entity it never agreed to cover. There are, of course, exceptions .

Can an Insurance Company Refuse to Honor an Assignment?

Yes, an insurance company can refuse to honor an assignment, though the exact circumstances vary by state and by policy. In California, for instance, the enforceability of the clause depends on both the timing of the assignment and whether the claim is a first party loss — where the insured is seeking benefits for, say, a sunk ship or a burned building — or a third party claim, which protects insured in certain instances when the insured might be liable to another.

With respect to first-party claims, insurers have a vested interest in their personal relationships with the named insureds, and before a loss , a legally recognized need to prevent non-consensual assignments to less responsible insureds. 2 Remember that a policy is a contract; the insurer has the right to understand and agree to any underwriting risks they may be taking on with the transference of the policy.

After a first-party loss , however, the insurer’s need to consent dissipates, because any assignment is only of money already due under the contract; any right of the insured as a result of the loss may be assigned with or without the consent of the insurer . Thus, the consent to assignment clause is deemed unenforceable after a first-party loss has occurred. 3

In a 2003 California Supreme Court Case, Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. , the Court determined that a company that acquired a policyholder’s assets and liabilities could not receive the benefits of the policyholder’s liability coverage in the absence of an insurer-approved assignment regardless of when the assignment took place. 4 However, the court overturned that precedent in 2015’s Fluor Corp. v. Superior Ct. , in which the Court found that “after personal injury (or property damage) resulting in loss occurs within the time limits of the policy, an insurer is precluded from refusing to honor an insured’s assignment of the right to invoke defense or indemnification coverage regarding that loss.” 5

Are Assignment Clauses Enforceable?

As we saw above, the enforceability of “consent-to-assignment” clauses is dependent on the law of each particular state . Always check with an attorney before making an assignment of policy benefits to another, regardless of the situation.

What Is an Anti-Assignment Clause in an Insurance Policy?

An anti-assignment clause is a contractual provision that prohibits or restricts the policyholder from transferring their rights or obligations under the policy to another party. There can be exceptions; for example, some policies may allow assignments in certain circumstances in case of the death or incapacitation of the policyholder. Like assignment provisions, anti-assignment clauses vary by policy, state , and circumstance; it is a good idea to consult an experienced attorney when dealing with insurance.

Further Resources on Insurance Coverage Law

Navigating the complexities of insurance claims can feel overwhelming. Whether you’re facing unpaid claims or simply filing for the first time, our eBooks equip you with the crucial information you need to advocate for yourself with confidence.

Filing A Property Insurance Claim
Insurance Company Response Time
What To Do When You Have a Denied/Underpaid Claim
Wildfire Claims
Flood Claims Handbook
More Information on Hurricane Deductible and Policy Limits
Condominium Hurricane Preparedness

Why Merlin?

Are you fighting an insurance company that won’t pay up on claims? With nearly 40 years of practice and $2 billion in recovered claims, our team stands by your side to ensure you can face any insurance challenge with confidence. Contact us today for a consultation, or read more about how we’re your trusted advocate .

1 Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 934 , 934. 2 Bergson v. Builders Ins. Co. (1869) 38 Cal. 541, 545. 3 Vierneisel v. Rhode Island Ins. Co. (1946) 77 Cal.App.2d 229 , 232 [house destroyed by fire before close of escrow; affirming assignment by sellers to buyers of right to recover proceeds under fire insurance policy]. 4 Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 934 , 934. 5 Fluor Corp. v. Superior Ct. , 61 Cal. 4th 1175, 1183, 354 P.3d 302, 305 (2015).

Can policy limitations or exclusions be disregarded as illusory?

There’s a Wildfire Burning – What Do I Need to Know About Insurance?

California Enters Wildfire Season Early and in the Midst of an Availability and Affordability Crisis

We’re ready to serve you.

Our firm represents residential, commercial and government entities in seeking timely, fair and proper compensation. We also support adjusters and contractors and work to protect their fees. In addition, we proudly serve as a reputable firm for referring attorneys to entrust their clients with should they be approached with an insurance claim case. Don’t fight insurance companies on your own. Contact us today!

Expert Insights Delivered to You

MyNewMarkets.com
Claims Journal
Insurance Journal TV
Academy of Insurance
Carrier Management

Current Magazine

Read Online

Post-Loss Assignments of Claims Under Insurance Policies

In the settlement of lawsuits involving insured claims, it is not uncommon that one condition of the settlement is that the defendant assign his or her claims under all applicable insurance policies to the party that filed suit.

Indeed, it is frequently the case that the defendant, particularly when the defendant is an individual, has a limited ability to pay a judgment and insurance coverage offers the best opportunity for a recovery by the suing party. Usually, such settlements are made without any serious thought being given to whether the defendant’s claim against its insurer is assignable; the assumption being that it is assignable.

However, insurance policies generally have anti-assignment clauses which prohibit the assignment of the policy, or an interest in the policy, without the insurer’s consent. These clauses come into play in determining the validity or enforceability of the assignment of a claim under an insurance policy and should be considered when such an assignment is part of a settlement.

When considering the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses in insurance policies, the courts generally draw a distinction between an assignment made prior to the occurrence of a covered loss (a “pre-loss” assignment) and an assignment made after the occurrence of a covered loss (a “post-loss” assignment).

In analyzing pre-loss assignments, the courts recognize that requiring an insurer to provide coverage to an assignee of its policy prior to the occurrence of a covered loss would place the insurer in the position of covering a party with whom it had not contracted nor been allowed to properly underwrite to assess the risks posed by that potential insured, and, accordingly, determine the appropriate premium to charge for the risks being undertaken or choose to decline coverage.

Post-loss assignments, on the other hand, take place after the insurer’s obligations under its policy have become fixed by the occurrence of a covered loss, thus the risk factors applicable to the assignee are irrelevant with regard to the covered loss in question. For these reasons, the majority of the courts enforce anti-assignment clauses to prohibit or restrict pre-loss assignments, but refuse to enforce anti-assignment clauses to prohibit or restrict post-loss assignments.

Katrina Cases

The Louisiana Supreme Court, which had not previously addressed the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses for post-loss assignments, was recently confronted with this issue in the In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, litigation involving consolidated cases arising out of Hurricane Katrina. The issue arose as a result of a lawsuit brought by the State of Louisiana as the assignee of claims under numerous insurance policies as part of the “Road Home” Program. The Road Home Program was set up following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to distribute federal funds to homeowners suffering damage from the hurricanes. In return for receiving a grant of up to $150,000, homeowners were required to execute a Limited Subrogation/Assignment agreement, which provided in pertinent part:

Pursuant to these Limited Subrogation/Assignments, the State of Louisiana brought suit against more than 200 insurance companies to recover funds dispensed under the Road Home Program. The suit was removed to Federal Court under the Class Action Fairness Act and the insurers filed motions to dismiss, arguing that the assignments to the State of Louisiana were invalid under the anti-assignment clauses in the homeowner policies at issue.

On appeal, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the following question to the Louisiana Supreme Court: “Does an anti-assignment clause in a homeowner’s insurance policy, which by its plain terms purports to bar any assignment of the policy or an interest therein without the insurer’s consent, bar an insured’s post-loss assignment of the insured’s claims under the policy when such an assignment transfers contractual obligations, not just the right to money due?”

In answering this question, the Louisiana Supreme Court began by noting that, as a general matter, contractual rights are assignable unless the law, the contract terms or the nature of the contract preclude assignment. Specific to the certified question, Louisiana Civil Code article 2653 provides that a right “cannot be assigned when the contract from which it arises prohibits the assignment of that right.” The Louisiana Supreme Court observed that the language of article 2653 is broad and, on its face, applies to all assignments, including post-loss assignments of insurance claims. The Court, therefore, construed the issue confronting it as whether Louisiana public policy would enforce an anti-assignment clause to preclude post-loss assignments of claims under insurance policies.

In addressing the public policy question, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the distinction between pre-loss assignments and post-loss assignments discussed by courts from other states and noted that the prevailing view was that anti-assignment clauses were invalid and/or unenforceable when applied to post-loss assignments. Notwithstanding this weight of authority, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated:

“[W]hile the Louisiana legislature has clearly indicated an intent to allow parties freedom to assign contractual rights, by enacting La. C.C. art. 2653, it has also clearly indicated an intent to allow parties freedom to contractually prohibit assignment of rights. We recognize the vast amount of national jurisprudence distinguishing between pre-loss and post-loss assignments and rejecting restrictions on post-loss assignments, however we find no public policy in Louisiana favoring assignability of claims over freedom of contract.”

Thus, Court refused to invalidate the enforceability of the anti-assignment clauses to the post-loss assignments before it based on public policy, adding that public policy determinations are better suited to the legislature.

Nonetheless, after having recognized the general enforceability of anti-assignment clauses to post-loss assignments, the Court immediately placed limits on when those clauses would be applicable, stating that to be applicable, they “must clearly and unambiguously express that the non-assignment clause applies to post-loss assignments.” The Court refused “to formulate a test consisting of specific terms or words,” which would satisfy this condition and remanded the case to the federal courts to determine whether the individual anti-assignment clauses in the various policies were sufficiently clear and explicit to be enforced with respect to post-loss assignments at issue.

A Broad Application

It should be noted that the Court’s opinion appears to apply broadly to all post-loss assignments irrespective of what specific rights are being assigned, despite the fact that the certified question was narrower and asked only about the applicability of a post-loss assignment where the assignment “transfers contractual obligations, not just the right to money due.”

In a footnote at the beginning of its opinion, the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that in certifying the question to it, the Fifth Circuit “disclaimed any intent” that the Court “confine its reply to the precise form or scope of the legal questions certified.” The footnote indicates that the Court’s opinion was not intended to be limited to only those post-loss assignments involving the assignment of contractual obligations.

Louisiana has departed from the majority view in holding that as a matter of general law, anti-assignment clauses are not inherently void with regard to post-loss assignments. However, it may be that in practical application, the results of individual cases may well be consistent with the majority rule of not enforcing anti-assignment clauses with regard to post-loss assignments because Louisiana courts may be reluctant to find that the anti-assignment clauses are sufficiently “clear and explicit” unless they specifically state that they apply to post-loss assignments, notwithstanding the Louisiana Supreme Court’s unwillingness to “formulate a test consisting of specific terms or words.”

Topics Lawsuits Carriers Profit Loss Claims Louisiana Hurricane Homeowners

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Written By Robert Redfearn, Jr.

From this issue.

Insurance Journal Magazine July 18, 2011

Excess, Surplus & Specialty Markets Directory Vol. II – The Industry’s Leading Coverage Placement Directory

Interested in carriers .

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Categories: Legal Beat
Have a hot lead? Email us at [email protected]

Insurance Jobs

Litigation Attorney - Diamond Bar, CA
Field Auto Adjuster – Staten Island, NY - New York, NY
Hybrid Inside Property Adjuster Trainee – Inside –Long Island City, NY - Long Island City, NY
Healthcare Financial/Actuarial Associate Director - Charlotte, NC
L&R-Client Legal Svc Attorney-Exp - Michigan, MI

3 Emerging Risks: Severe Convective Storms, Battery Energy Storage and Drones
Youth Sports Liability Market in 'Armageddon Mode'
Condos: A Difficult Market to Navigate
Inflation, the Economy and Workers’ Comp: A Positive Outlook
Umbrella Liability: The Triple Upsell Possibility for Personal Lines Clients

Volkswagen to Recall Nearly 99,000 EVs in U.S. Over Door Handle Issues
Verisk Estimates Global Modeled Insured Average Annual Loss from Nat Cats at $151B
Nestle to Pay €2 Million to End French Mineral Water Case
Red Lobster Landlord Sues Insurer to 'Clawback' $1.2M Fire Claim Payment
15 Feet of Storm Surge Possible When Francine Hits Gulf Coast, 125K Homes at Risk

September 12 Working with E&S Carriers: A Primer
September 19 Insurance: Approved for Recreational (Vehicle & Watercraft) Use
September 26 Risk Management and Insurance for the High Net Worth Client
October 3 D&O Coverage for Public Investigations

Notice of assignment of insurance policies and form of acknowledgement for an assignment by way of security: single company assignor—bilateral—specific monies

Published by a lexisnexis banking & finance expert, notice of assignment.

[ To be printed on the headed notepaper of the assignor ]

To: [ insert name and address of the relevant insurer ]

Date: [ • ]

Dear [ insert organisation name ],

[ insert brief description of the relevant insurance policy ]

We refer to the assignment of insurance policies (the ‘Assignment’) dated [ • ] and granted by us as assignor (the ‘Assignor’) in favour of [ insert name of lender ] (the ‘Lender’).

We refer to the insurance policy effected by us as the policy holder, with you as the insurer relating to [ insert brief description of relevant policy and risks covered ], with policy number [ • ] and any policy that may be effected to renew, substitute or replace such insurance policy (the ‘Insurance Policy’).

We give you notice that pursuant to the terms of the Assignment, we have assigned

Access this content for free with a 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:

Instant clarification on points of law
Smart search
Workflow tools
41 practice areas

** Trials are provided to all LexisNexis content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisNexis services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.

Get your quote today and take step closer to being able to benefit from:

36 practice areas

Get a LexisNexis quote

* denotes a required field

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

0330 161 1234

International Sales(Includes Middle East)
Latin America and the Caribbean
Netherlands
New Zealand
Philippines
South Africa
Switzerland
United States

HELP & SUPPORT

Legal Help and Support
Tolley Tax Help and Support

LEGAL SOLUTIONS

Compliance and Risk
Forms and Documents
Legal Drafting
Legal Research
Magazines and Journals
News and Media Analysis
Practice Management
Privacy Policy
Cookie Settings
Terms & Conditions
Data Protection Inquiry
Protecting Human Rights: Our Modern Slavery Agreement

Notice of Assignment | Practical Law

Notice of Assignment

Practical law canada standard document 3-599-7067 (approx. 8 pages).

Maintained • Canada (Common Law)

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

Catherine phillips.

PSL Principal Associate

It's the day of completion; security is taken, assignments are completed and funds move. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief. At this point, no-one wants to create unnecessary paperwork - not even the lawyers! Notices of assignment are, in some circumstances, optional. However, in other transactions they could be crucial to a lender's enforcement strategy. In the article below, we have given you the facts you need to consider when deciding whether or not you need to serve notice of assignment.

What issues are there with serving notice of assignment?

Assignments are useful tools for adding flexibility to banking transactions. They enable the transfer of one party's rights under a contract to a new party (for example, the right to receive an income stream or a debt) and allow security to be taken over intangible assets which might be unsuitable targets for a fixed charge. A lender's security net will often include assignments over contracts (such as insurance or material contracts), intellectual property rights, investments or receivables.

An assignment can be a legal assignment or an equitable assignment. If a legal assignment is required, the assignment must comply with a set of formalities set out in s136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which include the requirement to give notice to the contract counterparty.

The main difference between legal and equitable assignments (other than the formalities required to create them) is that with a legal assignment, the assignee can usually bring an action against the contract counterparty in its own name following assignment. However, with an equitable assignment, the assignee will usually be required to join in proceedings with the assignor (unless the assignee has been granted specific powers to circumvent that). That may be problematic if the assignor is no longer available or interested in participating.

Why should we serve a notice of assignment?

The legal status of the assignment may affect the credit scoring that can be given to a particular class of assets. It may also affect a lender's ability to effect part of its exit strategy if that strategy requires the lender to be able to deal directly with the contract counterparty.

The case concerned the assignment of a trade mark licence to GNIC . The other party to the licence agreement was H&B. H&B had not received notice of the assignment. GNIC tried to terminate the licence agreement for breach by serving a notice of termination. H&B disputed the termination. By this point in time the original licensor had been dissolved and so was unable to assist.

At a hearing of preliminary issues, the High Court held that the notices of termination served by GNIC , as an equitable assignee, were invalid, because no notice of the assignment had been given to the licensee. Although only a High Court decision, this follows a Court of Appeal decision in the Warner Bros Records Inc v Rollgreen Ltd case, which was decided in the context of the attempt to exercise an option.

In both cases, an equitable assignee attempted to exercise a contractual right that would change the contractual relationship between the parties (i.e. by terminating the contractual relationship or exercising an option to extend the term of a licence). The judge in GNIC felt that "in each case, the counterparty (the recipient of the relevant notice) is entitled to see that the potential change in his contractual position is brought about by a person who is entitled, and whom he can see to be entitled, to bring about that change".

In a security context, this could hamper the ability of a lender to maximise the value of the secured assets but yet is a constraint that, in most transactions, could be easily avoided.

Why not serve notice?

Sometimes it's just not necessary or desirable. For example:

If security is being taken over a large number of low value receivables or contracts, the time and cost involved in giving notice may be disproportionate to the additional value gained by obtaining a legal rather than an equitable assignment.
If enforcement action were required, the equitable assignee typically has the option to join in the assignor to any proceedings (if it could not be waived by the court) and provision could be made in the assignment deed for the assignor to assist in such situations. Powers of attorney are also typically granted so that a lender can bring an action in the assignor's name.
Enforcement is often not considered to be a significant issue given that the vast majority of assignees will never need to bring claims against the contract counterparty.

Care should however, be taken in all circumstances where the underlying contract contains a ban on assignment, as the contract counterparty would not have to recognise an assignment that is made in contravention of that ban. Furthermore, that contravention in itself may trigger termination and/or other rights in the assigned contract, that could affect the value of any underlying security.

What about acknowledgements of notices?

A simple acknowledgement of service of notice is simply evidence of the notice having been received. However, these documents often contain commitments or assurances by the contract counterparty which increase their value to the assignee.

Best practice for serving notice of assignment

Each transaction is different and the weighting given to each element of the security package will depend upon the nature of the debt and the borrower's business. The service of a notice of assignment may be a necessity or an optional extra. In each case, the question of whether to serve notice is best considered with your advisers at the start of a transaction to allow time for the lender's priorities to be highlighted to the borrowers and captured within the documents.

For further advice on serving notice of assignment please contact Kirsty Barnes or Catherine Phillips from our Banking & Finance team.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Related services

Simply Speaking (May 2020) — Insurance Assignments

May 28, 2020

Simply Speaking (May 2020)

Insurance Assignments

As security for the Obligations, the Assignor hereby grants, sells, transfers, assigns and sets over unto the Assignee, for the benefit of the Lender, a continuing, first priority security interest in and to all of the Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to and under the following property, whether now owned or existing or hereafter from time to time acquired or coming into existence:

all insurances (including, without limitation, all certificates of entry in protection and indemnity and war risks associations or clubs) in respect of the vessel, whether heretofore, now or hereafter effected, and all renewals of or replacements for the same;
all claims, returns of premium and other moneys and claims for moneys due and to become due under or in respect of said insurances;
all other rights of the Assignor under or in respect of said insurances; and
any proceeds of any of the foregoing.

What is it and what does it do?

A standard ship finance loan agreement requires that the borrower maintain certain insurances with respect to the vessel and grant the lender (or security agent/trustee on behalf of the lender) a security interest in such insurances. Typically, this is accomplished through an insurance assignment executed by the borrower/owner that grants a security interest in the insurances to the lender, as assignee, and sets out specific undertakings and perfection requirements relating to the insurances.

Why is it there and how is it relevant to shipping?

An insurance assignment is required in ship finance transactions because it helps protect the lender’s interest if there is a casualty affecting the vessel. Maritime casualties are an inherent risk in shipping, and there is always the possibility that the vessel may cause damage or be damaged or lost. The vessel is the primary collateral for a loan, and the lender will insist that it is protected in the unlikely event that the vessel causes damage or is damaged or lost.

More practically, an insurance assignment specifies what insurances are being assigned and set out how the security interest is perfected. The insurance assignment also sets out what terms the loss payable clauses endorsed onto the insurance policies include. The loss payable clauses, discussed further below, specify in what circumstances a loss payable by an insurer under a policy may be paid to the borrower/owner and in what circumstances such loss must be paid to the lender.

Why is it important (or not so important) to the lender?

Unlike many other types of collateral, security interests in insurance policies are carved out of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code which governs perfection of security interests. Therefore, a so-called “UCC financing statement” does not perfect the lender’s security interest, and the lender must take other actions to protect its interests in respect of the assigned insurance policies.

The perfection of a lender’s security interest in insurances is governed by state law, and generally requires that, together with the execution of an insurance assignment, notice be provided to the insurers. Therefore, an insurance assignment will include a form notice of assignment that the borrower must execute and deliver to the insurers as part of the borrower’s obligations under the insurance assignment. As additional protection, the lender also commonly requires the insurance underwriters to execute a letter of undertaking in favor of the lender and that the lender be named as an additional insured or loss payee on the policy, as further discussed below.

How does it affect the borrower in practical terms?

The insurance assignment affects the borrower primarily by (a) restricting under what circumstances a loss payable by an insurer may be paid to the borrower/owner, and (b) by placing certain initial and ongoing obligations on the borrower/owner. Initially, among other requirements, the borrower must provide notice of the assignment to the insurers to perfect the lender’s security interest. The insurance assignment also contains (if they are not set out in the loan agreement itself) restrictions on amending the insurances and include certain ongoing lender notification requirements. The borrower must be careful not to technically default under a loan agreement by failing to comply with the ongoing insurance notification requirements and undertakings.

How is it negotiated?

Insurance assignments are a standard element of any ship finance transaction. However, specific insurance coverage requirements are frequently negotiated between the borrower and the lender. While lender insurance coverage requirements often reflect insurance coverage the borrower already maintains, in some cases the lender may require more insurance cover or different types of cover (such as protection against loss of hire) than the borrower deems necessary, and the coverage requirements are then negotiated.

Unlike loan agreements and some of the other security documents in a ship finance transaction, an insurance assignment also commonly includes obligations on third parties. Under a typical insurance assignment, the insurance underwriters must (a) execute letters of undertaking in favor of the assignee, and/or (b) endorse loss payable clauses onto their policies. The insurance underwriters are not party to the insurance assignment itself, but must agree to provide these letters of undertaking and endorse the loss payable clauses. As such, when negotiating an insurance assignment, it is typical for the letters of undertaking and the loss payable clauses to be negotiated and agreed with the insurance underwriters during the documentation stage. Many insurers have preferred form letters of undertaking and will not agree to a letter of undertaking that does not follow such insurer’s preferred form.

With respect to the loss payable clauses, the borrower and lender often negotiate the thresholds and circumstances under which a loss payable may be paid to the borrower/owner. The borrower typically seeks to increase the threshold under which the insurer is permitted to make a payment directly to the borrower/owner without the consent of the lender. Conversely, the lender seeks a lower threshold to help protect its interest in the collateral. The lender typically requires losses payable in connection with a major casualty to be paid directly to the lender or requires that the lender first consent to any such payment to the borrower/owner, but allows payment of certain amounts directly to the borrower/owner, for example to affect repairs in the case of a smaller casualty. The threshold varies based on the value of the vessel, the anticipated size of any potential casualties, the size of the facility and the value of the other collateral securing the loan, and the financial strength of the borrower.

Related Attorneys

Lawrence Rutkowski

(212) 574-1206 [email protected]

Michael S. Timpone

(212) 574-1342 [email protected]

Related Practices

Related publications, july 31, 2019, simply speaking (july 2019) — prohibition on llc division/series transactions, june 27, 2019, simply speaking (june 2019) — service of process agent, simply speaking (may 2019) — u.s. coastwise trade citizenship requirements, simply speaking (april 2019) — ucc financing statements, march 29, 2019, simply speaking (march 2019) — fatca, february 28, 2019, simply speaking (february 2019) — increased costs, january 31, 2019, simply speaking (january 2019) — bail-in provision, august 28, 2019, simply speaking (august 2019) — libor fallback language, november 21, 2019, simply speaking (november 2019) — conditional payment instructions, january 13, 2020, simply speaking (january 2020) — “cramdown” in u.s. bankruptcy, february 26, 2020, simply speaking (february 2020) — marshall islands economic substance regulations, december 12, 2019, simply speaking (december 2019) — recharacterization — sale-leaseback transactions, march 31, 2020, simply speaking (march 2020) — erisa.

Search Search Please fill out this field.
Building Your Business
Business Insurance

Can You Assign Your Insurance Benefits to Someone Else?

Monashee Frantz / Getty Images

Most business insurance policies contain a so-called anti-assignment clause. This clause prohibits policyholders from transferring any of their rights under the policy to someone else. This means that the insured business cannot cede its right to collect claim payments to another party. However, laws in most states permit policyholders to transfer their rights to another party under certain circumstances.

Anti-Assignment Clause

In the standard ISO policies , the anti-assignment clause is located in a separate form called the Common Policy Conditions. These conditions apply to all coverages that are included in the policy. For instance, if a policy includes business auto , general liability , and commercial property coverages, the anti-assignment clause applies to all three coverages.

The clause is entitled Transfer of Your Rights and Duties Under This Policy. It includes the following provision:

Your rights and duties under this policy may not be transferred without our written consent except in the case of death of an individual named insured.

The anti-assignment clause prohibits the named insured from transferring any of its rights or obligations under the policy to someone else without the insurer's permission. The only exception is if the named insured is an individual (sole proprietor) and he or she dies. An assignment is permitted in this case because a sole proprietorship and the individual owner are one and the same. If the individual dies, the business cannot survive unless it is sold to someone else.

An anti-assignment clause is intended to prevent the insurer from unwittingly assuming risks it never intended to take on. Commercial insurers review business insurance applicants carefully. Before they issue policies, underwriters consider the knowledge and experience of a company's owners and managerial staff. If a business is sold to someone else, the new owners may not be as skilled or attentive as the previous ones. From the insurer's perspective, the new owners are an unknown risk.

Post-Loss Assignments Permitted

The anti-assignment clause doesn't distinguish between assignments made before a loss and those made afterward. Even so, courts in most states have allowed policyholders to assign their rights to another party after a loss has occurred. Pre-loss assignments are still prohibited. Here is an example of a post-loss assignment of insurance benefits.

Victor operates a restaurant called Vital Vittles out of a building he owns. Late one January night two water pipes in the building freeze. The pipes subsequently burst, causing considerable water damage to Victor's building. Victor is forced to close his restaurant until the repairs are completed.

Victor hires a water damage contractor called Rapid Restoration to repair the damage to his building. He tells the contractor that he needs the repairs done quickly as he is anxious to reopen his restaurant. The contractor says that the repairs can be expedited if Victor signs over his rights under the policy to Rapid Restoration. The contractor will then proceed with the repairs and negotiate a claim settlement with Vital Vittles' commercial property insurer. Victor agrees to the assignment and the contractor begins the repair work.

While Vital Vittles' commercial property policy contains an anti-assignment clause, Victor has assigned his rights to Rapid Restoration after a loss has occurred. Thus, in most states, Victor's insurer cannot reject the assignment (assuming post-loss assignments are permitted in Victor's state).

Problems With Assignments of Benefits

In recent years, assignment of benefits (AOB) agreements have been problematic in some states, particularly Florida. Unscrupulous contractors have preyed on unsuspecting homeowners and business owners who have suffered water damage . Some contractors work alone while others operate in cahoots with crooked lawyers. In either event, the contractor convinces the policyholder to assign his or her rights under the policy over to the contractor. The contractor then exaggerates the cost of the repairs and collects the inflated amount from the insurer. The policyholder is left with a large claim on his or her loss history. When the policy expires, the insurer may refuse to renew it.

In the previous example, Victor has assigned his rights under the policy to Rapid Restoration. Suppose that Rapid Restoration completes only half of the repair work on Victor's building. The actual cost is $15,000 but the contractor submits a bill to the insurer for $30,000. Alternatively, the contractor never submits a bill but sues the insurer for $30,000. In either case, the insurer may refuse to pay on the basis that the contractor has committed insurance fraud. Victor cannot intervene because he has signed his rights over to the contractor. If the contractor is unsuccessful in its lawsuit against the insurer, it may demand payment from Victor's company.

Avoiding Problems With AOBs

As a business owner, you can avoid problems associated with AOBs and unscrupulous contractors by taking the following steps:

Report any loss or accident directly to your insurer (or your agent or broker ). Notify your insurer immediately. Don't allow a contractor to do the notification on your behalf.
Take photos of the damage.
Don't allow any contractor to begin work until an insurance adjuster has documented the damage
Vet contractors thoroughly before hiring them. Make sure they are properly licensed. If your area has suffered a natural disaster, watch out for construction scams.
Don't sign an AOB unless you have reviewed it carefully. If you don't understand it, ask your agent, insurer, or attorney for assistance.
If your contractor won't do any work until you've signed an AOB, find another contractor.

AOBs in Health Insurance

Assignment of benefit agreements are common in health insurance. Patients are often asked to agree to such clauses before they receive treatment from a physician, hospital, or another healthcare provider. The assignment of benefits clause transfers a patient's right to collect benefits under his or her health policy to the provider. By signing the document, the patent agrees that payments will be made directly to the provider for the services rendered. The clause states that the patient is ultimately responsible for the charges if the insurer fails to pay.

Once the treatment has been performed, the provider submits the AOB along with a claim to the patient's health insurer. The insurer pays the provider for services rendered to the patient.

More Blog Popular
Who's Who Legal
Instruct Counsel
My newsfeed
Save & file
View original
Follow Please login to follow content.

add to folder:

My saved (default)

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

It's the day of completion; security is taken, assignments are completed and funds move. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief. At this point, no-one wants to create unnecessary paperwork – not even the lawyers! Notices of assignment are, in some circumstances, optional. However, in other transactions they could be crucial to a lender's enforcement strategy. In the article below, we have given you the facts you need to consider when deciding whether or not you need to serve notice.

What's the issue?

Why should we serve a notice of assignment?

The case of General Nutrition Investment Company (GNIC) v Holland and Barrett International Ltd and another (H&B) provides an example of an equitable assignee being unable to deal directly with a contract counterparty as a result of a failure to provide a notice of assignment. The case concerned the assignment of a trade mark licence to GNIC. The other party to the licence agreement was H&B. H&B had not received notice of the assignment. GNIC tried to terminate the licence agreement for breach by serving a notice of termination. H&B disputed the termination. By this point in time the original licensor had been dissolved and so was unable to assist. At a hearing of preliminary issues, the High Court held that the notices of termination served by GNIC, as an equitable assignee, were invalid, because no notice of the assignment had been given to the licensee. Although only a High Court decision, this follows a Court of Appeal decision in the Warner Bros Records Inc v Rollgreen Ltd case, which was decided in the context of the attempt to exercise an option.

In a security context, this could hamper the ability of a lender to maximise the value of the secured assets but yet is a constraint that, in most transactions, could be easily avoided.

Why not serve notice?

Sometimes it's just not necessary or desirable. For example:

If security is being taken over a large number of low value receivables or contracts, the time and cost involved in giving notice may be disproportionate to the additional value gained by obtaining a legal rather than an equitable assignment.
If enforcement action were required, the equitable assignee typically has the option to join in the assignor to any proceedings (if it could not be waived by the court) and provision could be made in the assignment deed for the assignor to assist in such situations. Powers of attorney are also typically granted so that a lender can bring an action in the assignor's name.
Enforcement is often not considered to be a significant issue given that the vast majority of assignees will never need to bring claims against the contract counterparty.

What about acknowledgements of notices?

Filed under

United Kingdom
Capital Markets
Gowling WLG
High Court of Justice (England & Wales)

Related practical resources PRO

Checklist Checklist: Key checks for firms to consider when approving financial promotions (UK) Recently updated
Checklist Checklist: Running an effective board meeting (UK)
How-to guide How-to guide: Corporate governance in financial services (UK)

Related research hubs

What is a notice of assignment?

An assignment takes place when one party is holding a right to property, claims, bills, lease, etc., of another party and wishes to pass it along (or sell it) to a third party. As complicated as that sounds, it really isn’t. Strangely enough, many assignments can be made under the law without immediately informing, or obtaining the permission, of the personal obligated to perform under the contract. An example of this is when your mortgage is sold to another mortgage company. The original mortgage company may not inform you for several weeks, and they certainly aren’t going to ask your permission to make the sale.

If a person obligated to perform has received notice of the assignment and still insists on paying the initial assignor, the person will still be obligated to pay the new assignee according to the agreement. If the obligated party has not yet been informed of the assignment and pays the original note holder (assignor), the assignor is obligated to turn those funds over to the new assignee. But, what are the remedies if this doesn’t take place? Actually, the new assignee may find themselves in a difficult position if the assignor simply takes off with their funds or payment. They are limited to taking action against the person they bought the note from (assignor) and cannot hold the obligator liable. Therefore, it is important to remember that if any note or obligation is assigned to another party, each party should be well aware of their responsibilities in the transaction and uphold them according to the laws of their state. Assignment forms should be well thought out and written in a manner which prevents the failure of one party against another.

Does your Agreement Require an Assignment Legal Form?
Why Every Landlord and Tenant Needs a Lease Agreement
Why you need a Power of Attorney and How to Assign One

Seven Slip-and-Fall Accidents FAQs That You Should Know
What is a mutual non-disclosure agreement?
Can I use a form to change my name?
When do I need a mechanic’s lien?

Assignment under Insurance Policies

By J Mandakini, NUALS

Editor’s Note: This paper attempts to explore the concept of assignment under Indian law especially Contract Act, Insurance Act and Transfer of Property Act. It seeks to appreciate why the assignment is made use of for securities of a facility sanctioned by ICICI Bank. Also, it explains how ICICI Bank faces certain problems in executing the same.

INTRODUCTION

For any facility sanctioned by a lender, collateral is always deposited to secure the same. Such mere deposition will not suffice, the borrower has to explicitly permit the lender to recover from the borrower, such securities in case of his default.

This is done by the concept of assignment, dealt with adequately in Indian law. Assignment of obligations is always a tricky matter and needs to be dealt with carefully. The Bank should not fall short of any legally permitted lengths to ensure the same. This is why ambiguity in its security documents have to be rectified.

This paper attempts to explore the concept of assignment in contract law. It seeks to appreciate why the assignment is made use of for securities of a facility sanctioned by ICICI Bank. The next section will deal with how ICICI Bank faces certain problems in executing the same. The following sections will talk about possible risks involved, as well as defenses and solutions to the same.

WHAT IS ASSIGNMENT?

Assignment refers to the transfer of certain or all (depending on the agreement) rights to another party. The party which transfers its rights is called an assignor, and the party to whom such rights are transferred is called an assignee. Assignment only takes place after the original contract has been made. As a general rule, assignment of rights and benefits under a contract may be done freely, but the assignment of liabilities and obligations may not be done without the consent of the original contracting party.

The liability on a contract cannot be transferred so as to discharge the person or estate of the original contractor unless the creditor agrees to accept the liability of another person instead of the first. [i]

Illustration

P agrees to sell his car to Q for Rs. 100. P assigns the right to receive the Rs. 100 to S. This may be done without the consent of Q. This is because Q is receiving his car, and it does not particularly matter to him, to whom the Rs. 100 is being handed as long as he is being absolved of his liability under the contract. However, notice may still be required to be given. Without such notice, Q would pay P, in spite of the fact that such right has been assigned to S. S would be a sufferer in such case.

In this case, that condition is being fulfilled since P has assigned his right to S. However, P may not assign S to be the seller. P cannot just transfer his duties under the contract to another. This is because Q has no guarantee as to the condition of S’s car. P entered into the contract with Q on the basis of the merits of P’s car, or any other personal qualifications of P. Such assignment may be done with the consent of all three parties – P, Q, S, and by doing this, P is absolved of his liabilities under the contract.

1.1. Effect of Assignment

Immediately on the execution of an assignment of an insurance policy, the assignor forgoes all his rights, title and interest in the policy to the assignee. The premium or loan interest notices etc. in such cases will be sent to the assignee. [ii] However, the existence of obligations must not be assumed, when it comes to the assignment. It must be accompanied by evidence of the same. The party asserting such a personal obligation must prove the existence of an express assumption by clear and unequivocal proof. [iii]

Assignment of a contract to a third party destroys the privity of contract between the initial contracting parties. New privity is created between the assignee and the original contracting party. In the illustration mentioned above, the original contracting parties were P and Q. After the assignment, the new contracting parties are Q and S.

1.2. Revocation of Assignment

Assignment, once validly executed, can neither be revoked nor canceled at the option of the assignor. To do so, the insurance policy will have to be reassigned to the original assignor (the insured).

1.3. Exceptions to Assignment

There are some instances where the contract cannot be assigned to another.

Express provisions in the contract as to its non-assignability – Some contracts may include a specific clause prohibiting assignment. If that is so, then such a contract cannot be assigned. Assignability is the rule and the contrary is an exception. [iv]

Pensions, PFs, military benefits etc. Illustration

1.4. enforcing a contract of assignment.

From the day on which notice is given to the insurer, the assignee becomes the beneficiary of the policy even though the assignment is not registered immediately. It does not wait until the giving of notice of the transfer to the insurer. [vi] However, no claims may lie against the insurer until and unless notice of such assignment is delivered to the insurer.

If notice of assignment is not provided to the obligor, he is discharged if he pays to the assignor. Assignee would have to recover from the assignor. However, if the obligor pays the assignor in spite of the notice provided to him, he would still be liable to the assignee.

The following two illustrations make the point amply clear:

Illustrations

1. Seller A assigns its right to payment from buyer X to bank B. Neither A nor B gives notice to X. When payment is due, X pays A. This payment is fully valid and X is discharged. It will be up to B to recover it from A

2. Seller A assigns to bank B its right to payment from buyer X. B immediately gives notice of the assignment to X. When payment is due, X still pays A. X is not discharged and B is entitled to oblige X to pay a second time.

An assignee doesn’t stand in better shoes than those of his assignor. Thus, if there is any breach of contract by the obligor to the assignee, the latter can recover from the former only the same amount as restricted by counter claims, set offs or liens of the assignor to the obligor.

The acknowledgment of notice of assignment is conclusive proof of, and evidence enough to entertain a suit against an assignor and the insurer respectively who haven’t honoured the contract of assignment.

1.5. Assignment under various laws in India

There is no separate law in India which deals with the concept of assignment. Instead, several laws have codified it under different laws. Some of them have been discussed as follows:

1.5.1. Under the Indian Contract Act

There is no express provision for the assignment of contracts under the Indian Contract Act. Section 37 of the Act provides for the duty of parties of a contract to honour such contract (unless the need for the same has been done away with). This is how the Act attempts to introduce the concept of assignment into Indian commercial law. It lays down a general responsibility on the “representatives” of any parties to a contract that may have expired before the completion of the contract. (Illustrations to Section 37 in the Act).

An exception to this may be found from the contract, e.g. contracts of a personal nature. Representatives of a deceased party to a contract cannot claim privity to that contract while refusing to honour such contract. Under this Section, “representatives” would also include within its ambit, transferees and assignees. [vii]

Section 41 of the Indian Contract Act applies to cases where a contract is performed by a third party and not the original parties to the contract. It applies to cases of assignment. [viii] A promisee accepting performance of the promise from a third person cannot afterwards enforce it against the promisor. [ix] He cannot attain double satisfaction of its claim, i.e., from the promisor as well as the third party which performed the contract. An essential condition for the invocation of this Section is that there must be actual performance of the contract and not of a substituted promise.

1.5.2. Under the Insurance Act

The creation of assignment of life insurance policies is provided for, under Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938.

When the insurer receives the endorsement or notice, the fact of assignment shall be recorded with all details (date of receipt of notice – also used to prioritise simultaneous claims, the name of assignee etc). Upon request, and for a fee of an amount not exceeding Re. 1, the insurer shall grant a written acknowledgment of the receipt of such assignment, thereby conclusively proving the fact of his receipt of the notice or endorsement. Now, the insurer shall recognize only the assignee as the legally valid party entitled to the insurance policy.

1.5.3. Under the Transfer of Property Act

Indian law as to assignment of life policies before the Insurance Act, 1938 was governed by Sections 130, 131, 132 and 135 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 under Chapter VIII of the Act – Of Transfers of Actionable Claims. Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act states that nothing contained in that Section is to affect Section 38 of the Insurance Act.

I) Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act

An actionable claim may be transferred only by fulfilling the following steps:

Signed by a transferor (or his authorized agent)

The transfer will be complete and effectual as soon as such an instrument is executed. No particular form or language has been prescribed for the transfer. It does not depend on giving notice to the debtor.

The proviso in the section protects a debtor (or other person), who, without knowledge of the transfer pays his creditor instead of the assignee. As long as such payment was without knowledge of the transfer, such payment will be a valid discharge against the transferee. When the transfer of any actionable claim is validly complete, all rights and remedies of transferor would vest now in the transferee. Existence of an instrument in writing is a sine qua non of a valid transfer of an actionable claim. [x]

II) Section 131 of the Transfer Of Property Act

This Section requires the notice of transfer of actionable claim, as sent to the debtor, to be signed by the transferor (or by his authorized agent), and if he refuses to sign it, a signature by the transferee (or by his authorized agent). Such notice must state both the name and address of the transferee. This Section is intended to protect the transferee, to receive from the debtor. The transfer does not bind a debtor unless the transferor (or transferee, if transferor refuses) sends him an express notice, in accordance with the provisions of this Section.

III) Section 132 of the Transfer Of Property Act

This Section addresses the issue as to who should undertake the obligations under the transfer, i.e., who will discharge the liabilities of the transferor when the transfer has been made complete – would it be the transferor himself or the transferee, to whom the rest of the surviving contract, so to speak, has been transferred.

This Section stipulates, that the transferee himself would fulfill such obligations. However, where an actionable claim is transferred with the stipulation in the contract that transferor himself should discharge the liability, then such a provision in the contract will supersede Ss 130 and 132 of this Act. Where the insured hypothecates his life insurance policies and stipulates that he himself would pay the premiums, the transferee is not bound to pay the premiums. [xi]

FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICIES – HOW ASSIGNMENT COMES INTO THE PICTURE

Many banks require the borrower to take out or deposit an insurance policy as security when they request a personal loan or a business loan from that institution. The policy is used as a way of securing the loan, ensuring that the bank will have the facility repaid in the event of either the borrower’s death or his deviations from the terms of the facility agreement.

Along with the deposit of the insurance policy, the policyholder will also have to assign the benefits of the policy to the financial institution from which he proposes to avail a facility. The mere deposit, without writing, or passing of any document of title to such a claim, does not create any equitable charge. [xii]

ETHICS OF ASSIGNING LIFE INSURANCE POLICY TO LENDERS

The purpose of taking out a life insurance policy on oneself, is that in the event of an untimely death, near and dear ones of the deceased are not left high and dry, and that they would have something to fall back on during such traumatic times. Depositing and assigning the rights under such policy document to another, would mean that there is a high chance that benefits of life insurance would vest in such other, in the event of unfortunate death and the family members are prioritized only second. These are not desirable circumstances where the family would be forced to cope with the death of their loved one coupled with the financial crisis.

Thus, there is a need to examine the ethics of:

The bank accepting such assignment

The customer should be cautious before assigning his rights under life insurance policies. By “cautious”, it is only meant that he and his dependents and/or legal heirs should be aware of the repercussions of the act of assigning his life insurance policy. It is conceded that no law prohibits the assignment of life insurance policies.

In fact, Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 , provides for such assignments. Judicial cases have held life insurance policies as property more than a social welfare measure. [xiii] Further, the bank has no personal relationship with any customer and thus has no moral obligation to not accept such assignments of life insurance.

However, the writer is of the opinion that, in dealing with the assignment of life insurance policies, utmost care and caution must be taken by the insured when assigning his life insurance policy to anyone else.

CURRENT STAND OF ICICI REGARDING FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICY, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO ASSIGNMENT OF OBLIGATIONS

This Section seeks to address and highlight the manner in which ICICI Bank drafts its security documents with regard to the assignment of obligations. The texts placed in quotes in the subsequent paragraphs are verbatim extracts from the security document as mentioned.

Composite Document for Corporate and Realty Funding

“ 8 . CHARGING CLAUSE

The Mortgagor doth hereby:

iii) Assign and transfer unto the Mortgagee all the Bank Accounts and all rights, title, interest, benefits, claims and demands whatsoever of the Mortgagor in, to, under and in respect of the Bank Accounts and all monies including all cash flows and receivables and all proceeds arising from Projects and Other Projects_______________, insurance proceeds, which have been deposited / credited / lying in the Bank Accounts, all records, investments, assets, instruments and securities which represent all amounts in the Bank Accounts, both present and future (the “Account Assets”, which expression shall, as the context may permit or require, mean any or each of such Account Assets) to have and hold the same unto and to the use of the Mortgagee absolutely and subject to the powers and provisions herein contained and subject also to the proviso for redemption hereinafter mentioned;

(v) Assign and transfer unto the Mortgagee all right, title, interest, benefit, claims and demands whatsoever of the Mortgagors, in, to, under and/or in respect of the Project Documents (including insurance policies) including, without limitation, the right to compel performance thereunder, and to substitute, or to be substituted for, the Mortgagor thereunder, and to commence and conduct either in the name of the Mortgagor or in their own names or otherwise any proceedings against any persons in respect of any breach of, the Project Documents and, including without limitation, rights and benefits to all amounts owing to, or received by, the Mortgagor and all claims thereunder and all other claims of the Mortgagor under or in any proceedings against all or any such persons and together with the right to further assign any of the Project Documents, both present and future, to have and to hold all and singular the aforesaid assets, rights, properties, etc. unto and to the use of the Mortgagee absolutely and subject to the powers and provisions contained herein and subject also to the proviso for redemption hereinafter mentioned.”

ICICI Bank’s Standard Terms and Conditions Governing Consumer Durable Loans

“ insurance.

The Borrower further agrees that upon any monies becoming due under the policy, the same shall be paid by the Insurance Company to ICICI Bank without any reference / notice to the Borrower, but not exceeding the principal amount outstanding under the Insurance Policy. The Borrower specifically acknowledges that in all cases of claim, the Insurance Company will be solely liable for settlement of the claim, and he/she will not hold ICICI Bank responsible in any manner whether for compensation, recovery of compensation, processing of claims or for any reason whatsoever.

Reference has been made only to assignment of assets, rights, benefits, interests, properties etc. No specific reference has been made to the assignment of obligations of the assignor under such insurance contract.

THE ISSUE FACED BY ICICI BANK

Where ICICI Bank accepts insurance policy documents of customers as security for a loan, in the light of the fact that the documents are silent about the question of assignment of obligations, are they assigned to ICICI Bank? Where there is hypothecation of a life insurance policy, with a stipulation that the mortgagor (assignor) should pay the premiums, and that the mortgagee (assignee) is not bound to pay the same, Sections 130 and 132 do not apply to such cases. [xiv] With rectification of this issue, ICICI Bank can concretize its hold over the securities with no reservations about its legality.

RISKS INVOLVED

This section of the paper attempts to explore the many risks that ICICI Bank is exposed to, or other factors which worsen the situation, due to the omission of a clause detailing the assignment of obligations by ICICI Bank.

Practices of Other Companies

The practices of other companies could be a risk factor for ICICI Bank in the light of the fact that some of them expressly exclude assignment of obligations in their security documents.

There are some companies whose notice of assignment forms contain an exclusive clause dealing with the assignment of obligations. It states that while rights and benefits accruing out of the insurance policy are to be assigned to the bank, obligations which arise out of such policy documents will not be liable to be performed by the bank. Thus, they explicitly provide for the only assignment of rights and benefits and never the assignment of obligations.

Possible Obligation to Insurance Companies

By not clearing up this issue, ICICI Bank could be held to be obligated to the insurance company from whom the assignor took the policy, for example, with respect to insurance premiums which were required to be paid by the assignor. This is not a desirable scenario for ICICI Bank. In case of default by the assignor in the terms of the contract, the right of ICICI Bank over the security deposited (insurance policy in question) could be fraught in the legal dispute.

Possible litigation

Numerous suits may be instituted against ICICI Bank alleging a violation of the Indian Contract Act. Some examples include allegations of concealment of fact, fraud etc. These could be enough to render the existing contract of assignment voidable or even void.

Contra Proferentem

This doctrine applies in a situation when a provision in the contract can be interpreted in more than one way, thereby creating ambiguities. It attempts to provide a solution to interpreting vague terms by laying down, that a party which drafts and imposes an ambiguous term should not benefit from that ambiguity. Where there is any doubt or ambiguity in the words of an exclusion clause, the words are construed more forcibly against the party putting forth the document, and in favour of the other party. [xv]

The doctrine of contra proferentem attempts to protect the layman from the legally knowledgeable companies which draft standard forms of contracts, in which the former stands on a much weaker footing with regard to bargaining power with the latter. This doctrine has been used in interpreting insurance contracts in India. [xvi]

If litigation ensues as a result of this uncertainty, there are high chances that the Courts will tend to favour the assignor and not the drafter of the documents.

POSSIBLE DEFENSES AGAINST DISPUTES FOR THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS AS THEY ARE NOW

This section of the paper attempts to give defences which the Bank may raise in case of any disputes arising out of silence on the matter of assignability of obligations.

Interpretation of the Security Documents

UNIDROIT principles expressly provide a method for interpretation of contracts. [xvii] The method consists of utilizing the following factors:

This defence relates to the concept of estoppel embodied in Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. According to the Section, when one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representatives, to deny the truth of that thing.

If a man either by words or by conduct has intimated that he consents to an act which has been done and that he will not offer any opposition to it, and he thereby induces others to do that which they otherwise might have abstained from, he cannot question legality of the act he had sanctioned to the prejudice of those who have so given faith to his words or to the fair inference to be drawn from his conduct. [xviii] Subsequent conduct may be relevant to show that the contract exists, or to show variation in the terms of the contract, or waiver, or estoppel. [xix]

Where the meaning of the instrument is ambiguous, a statement subsequently interpreting such instrument is admissible. [xx] In the present case, where the borrower has never raised any claims with regard to non assignability of obligations on him, and has consented to the present conditions and relations with ICICI Bank, he cannot he cannot be allowed to raise any claims with respect to the same.

Internationally, the doctrine of post contractual conduct is invoked for such disputes. It refers to the acts of parties to a contract after the commencement of the contract. It stipulates that where a party has behaved in a particular manner, so as to induce the other party to discharge its obligations, even if there has been a variation from the terms of the contract, the first party cannot cite such variation as a reason for its breach of the contract.

Where the parties to a contract are both under a common mistake as to the meaning or effect of it, and therefore embark on a course of dealing on the footing of that mistake, thereby replacing the original terms of the contract by a conventional basis on which they both conduct their affairs, then the original contract is replaced by the conventional basis. The parties are bound by the conventional basis. Either party can sue or be sued upon it just as if it had been expressly agreed between them. [xxi]

The importance of consensus ad idem has been concretized by various case laws in India. Further, if the stipulations and terms are uncertain and the parties are not ad idem there can be no specific performance, for there was no contract at all. [xxii]

In the present case, the minds of the assignor and assignee can be said to have not met while entering into the assignment. The assignee never had any intention of undertaking any obligations of the assignor. In Hartog v Colin & Shields, [xxiii] the defendants made an offer to the plaintiffs to sell hare skins, offering to a pay a price per pound instead of per piece.

AVOIDING THESE RISKS

To concretize ICICI Bank’s stand on the assignment of obligations in the matter of loans secured by insurance policies, the relevant security documents could be amended to include such a clause.

For instances where loans are secured by life insurance policies, a standard set by the American Banker’s Association (ABA) has been followed by many Indian commercial institutions as well. [xxvi] The ABA is a trade association in the USA representing banks ranging from the smallest community bank to the largest bank holding companies. ABA’s principal activities include lobbying, professional development for member institutions, maintenance of best practices and industry standards, consumer education, and distribution of products and services. [xxvii]

There are several ICICI security documents which have included clauses denying any assignment of obligations to it. An extract of the deed of hypothecation for vehicle loan has been reproduced below:

“ 3. In further pursuance of the Loan Terms and for the consideration aforesaid, the Hypothecator hereby further agrees, confirms, declares and undertakes with the Bank as follows:

(i)(a) The Hypothecator shall at its expenses keep the Assets in good and marketable condition and, if stipulated by the Bank under the Loan Terms, insure such of the Assets which are of insurable nature, in the joint names of the Hypothecator and the Bank against any loss or damage by theft, fire, lightning, earthquake, explosion, riot, strike, civil commotion, storm, tempest, flood, erection risk, war risk and such other risks as may be determined by the Bank and including wherever applicable, all marine, transit and other hazards incidental to the acquisition, transportation and delivery of the relevant Assets to the place of use or installation. The Hypothecator shall deliver to the Bank the relevant policies of insurance and maintain such insurance throughout the continuance of the security of these presents and deliver to the Bank the renewal receipts / endorsements / renewed policies therefore and till such insurance policies / renewal policies / endorsements are delivered to the Bank, the same shall be held by the Hypothecator in trust for the Bank. The Hypothecator shall duly and punctually pay all premia and shall not do or suffer to be done or omit to do or be done any act, which may invalidate or avoid such insurance. In default, the Bank may (but shall not be bound to) keep in good condition and render marketable the relevant Assets and take out / renew such insurance. Any premium paid by the Bank and any costs, charges and expenses incurred by the Bank shall forthwith on receipt of a notice of demand from the Bank be reimbursed by the Hypothecator and/or Borrower to the Bank together with interest thereon at the rate for further interest as specified under the Loan Terms, from the date of payment till reimbursement thereof and until such reimbursement, the same shall be a charge on the Assets…”

The inclusion of such a clause in all security documents of the Bank can avoid the problem of assignability of obligations in insurance policies used as security for any facility sanctioned by it.

An assignment of securities is of utmost importance to any lender to secure the facility, without which the lender will not be entitled to any interest in the securities so deposited.

In this paper, one has seen the need for assignment of securities of a facility. Risks involved in not having a separate clause dealing with non assignability of obligations have been discussed. Certain defences which ICICI Bank may raise in case of the dispute have also been enumerated along with solutions to the same.

Formatted by March 2nd, 2019.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[i] J.H. Tod v. Lakhmidas , 16 Bom 441, 449

[ii] http://www.licindia.in/policy_conditions.htm#12, last visited 30 th June, 2014

[iii] Headwaters Construction Co. Ltd. v National City Mortgage Co. Ltd., 720 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (D. Idaho 2010)

[iv] Indian Contract Act and Specific Relief Act, Mulla, Vol. I, 13 th Edn., Reprint 2010, p 968

[v] Khardah Co. Ltd. v. Raymond & Co ., AIR 1962 SC 1810: (1963) 3 SCR 183

[vi] Principles of Insurance Law, M.N. Srinivasan, 8 th Edn., 2006, p. 857

[vii] Ram Baran v Ram Mohit , AIR 1967 SC 744: (1967) 1 SCR 293

[viii] Sri Sarada Mills Ltd. v Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 281

[ix] Lala Kapurchand Godha v Mir Nawah Himayatali Khan, [1963] 2 SCR 168

[x] Velayudhan v Pillaiyar, 9 Mad LT 102 (Mad)

[xi] Hindustan Ideal Insurance Co. Ltd. v Satteya, AIR 1961 AP 183

[xii] Mulraj Khatau v Vishwanath, 40 IA 24 – Respondent based his claim on a mere deposit of the policy and not under a written transfer and claimed that a charge had thus been created on the policy.

[xiii] Insure Policy Plus Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v The Life Insurance Corporation of India, 2007(109)BOMLR559

[xiv] Transfer of Property Act, Sanjiva Row, 7 th Edn., 2011, Vol II, Universal Law Publishing Company, New Delhi

[xv] Ghaziabad Development Authority v Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 2003

[xvi] United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v M/s. Pushpalaya Printers, [2004] 3 SCR 631, General Assurance Society Ltd. v Chandumull Jain & Anr., [1966 (3) SCR 500]

[xvii] UNIDROIT Principles, Art 4.3

[xviii] B.L.Sreedhar & Ors. v K.M. Munireddy & Ors., 2002 (9) SCALE 183

[xix] James Miller & Partners Ltd. v Whitworth Street Estates (Manchester) Ltd., [1970] 1 All ER 796 (HL)

[xx] Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v State of Gujarat, AIR 1975 SC 32

[xxi] Amalgamated Investment & Property Co. Ltd. v Texas Commerce International Bank Ltd., [1981] 1 All ER 923

[xxii] Smt. Mayawanti v Smt. Kaushalya Devi, 1990 SCR (2) 350

[xxiii] [1939] 3 All ER 566

[xxiv] Terrell v Alexandria Auto Co., 12 La.App. 625

[xxv] http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/CISG25/Pamboukis.pdf, last visited on 30 th June, 2014

[xxvi] https://www.phoenixwm.phl.com/shared/eforms/getdoc.jsp?DocId=525.pdf, last visited on 30 th June, 2014

[xxvii] http://www.aba.com/About/Pages/default.aspx, last visited on 30 th June, 2014

Notice of Assignment

Practical law standard document 2-508-6945 (approx. 11 pages), get full access to this document with a free trial.

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

General Contract and Boilerplate

Measure the Client Experience
Build Online Reputation
Differentiate on Service Quality
ClearlyRated Business Solutions
Client Login

BB&T Insurance Services of Saint Petersburg, FL

There are no current ratings for this location.

BB&T Insurance Services is located at 12485 28th Street N, 2nd Floor Saint Petersburg, FL and BB&T Insurance Services operates in the Insurance industry.

Get in Touch

email: [email protected]

phone: 727-327-7070

fax: 888-632-8451

BB&T Insurance Services

12485 28th Street N, 2nd Floor

Saint Petersburg, FL 33716

About BB&T Insurance Services

BB&T Insurance Services is in the Insurance industry with company headquarters in Mobile, AL and has 90 BB&T Insurance Services locations.

Company Headquarters

BB&T Insurance Services 41 West I-65 Service Road, 2nd Floor Mobile, AL 36608

phone: 251-438-9800

fax: 888-751-3021

BB&T Insurance Services earned these Best of Insurance Awards

IMAGES

Free Insurance Assignment Agreement
FREE 11+ Notice of Assignment Samples in PDF
EMPLOYER'S NOTICE of INSURANCE Form
FREE 11+ Assignment of Insurance Policy Samples in PDF
FREE 11+ Assignment of Insurance Policy Samples in PDF
Assignment Insurance Form ≡ Fill Out Printable PDF Forms Online

VIDEO

INS200 ASSIGNMENT BURGLARY INSURANCE
Marine Insurance Group Assignment
Developing Business Message: The Writing Process
NMIMS -Sept 2024 Assignment: Insurance and Risk Management_ SEM4
Insurance 101 Week 8 Personal Finance University of Houston
national life insurance vacancy notice 2081/Kathmandu job/ support us to subscribe channel

COMMENTS

Insurance Policy Assignment Provisions: What They Are and When Insurers
In fact, most insurance policies have a "consent to assignment clause" that typically provides that: "Assignment of interest under this policy shall not bind the Company until its consent is endorsed hereon." 1 This clause is designed to protect the insurer from having to extend coverage to an entity it never agreed to cover.
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE Sample Clauses
Sample 1 Sample 2. NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE. The undersigned, [SHIPOWNER], the Owner of the United States documented vessel [VESSEL] (the "Vessel"), hereby gives you notice that by a Security Agreement dated as of [DATE] entered into by OSG Bulk Ships, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, including the Owner, and Wxxxx Fargo Bank ...
Post-Loss Assignments of Claims Under Insurance Policies
Post-loss assignments, on the other hand, take place after the insurer's obligations under its policy have become fixed by the occurrence of a covered loss, thus the risk factors applicable to ...
Assignment of insurance policies and claims
Assignment of insurance policies and claims. An overview of the legal principles that apply when assigning an insurance policy or the right to receive the insurance monies due under the policy to a third party. It considers the requirements that must be met for the assignment to be valid and explains the difference between assignment, co ...
Notice of Assignment of Insurances Definition
Related to Notice of Assignment of Insurances. Assignment of Insurances shall have the meaning provided in the definition of "Collateral and Guaranty Requirements".. Notice of Assignment is defined in Section 12.3.2.. Certificate of Insurance means a document showing that an insurance policy has been written and includes a statement of the coverage of the policy.
PDF Guide/FAQ on Submitting a Notice of Assignment for Policy Assignment
Assignment of a life insurance policy means transfer of rights from one person to another. You can transfer the rights on your life insurance policy to another person/entity for various reasons. This process is referred to as Assignment and is governed under Policies of Assurance Act (Chapter 392). The person who assigns the insurance policy is ...
PDF Assignment of insurance policies and claims in insolvency
include an assignment of the land and buildings insurance in respect of a property being sold out of the insolvent estate. In this instance, particularly where the insurer's consent to the assignment is obtained, and the insurer acknowledges the assignee's interest in the policy, the assignment is more akin to a novation.
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE RECEIVABLES Sample Clauses
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE RECEIVABLES. 6.1 The Assignor shall notify by registered mail (Einschreiben mit Rückschein) the relevant debtors of the assignment of the Insurance Receivables constituted hereunder in the form set out in Schedule 7 ( Form of Notice for a Disclosed Assignment), within 10 (ten) business days from the date ...
Notice Of Assignment For Insurance
A notice of assignment for insurance serves as a legal document that informs an insurance company about an assignment made by the policyholder, transferring ownership or benefit rights to another party. This notice is crucial for ensuring that the new beneficiary receives the appropriate benefits and claims associated with the insurance policy.
Notice of assignment of insurance policies and form of acknowledgement
Notice of assignment [To be printed on the headed notepaper of the assignor]To: [insert name and address of the relevant insurer]Date: [•]Dear [insert organisation name],[insert brief description of the relevant insurance policy]1. We refer to the assignment of insurance policies (the 'Assignment') dated [•] and granted by us as assignor (the 'Assignor') in favour of [insert name ...
Notice of Assignment
A form letter that an assignee of contractual rights or delegatee of contractual duties uses to provide notice to the non-assigning or non-delegating party to the contract (also known as the obligor) of a transfer of contractual rights or duties. This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations and drafting tips.
Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment
An assignment can be a legal assignment or an equitable assignment. If a legal assignment is required, the assignment must comply with a set of formalities set out in s136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which include the requirement to give notice to the contract counterparty.
Simply Speaking (May 2020)
The insurance assignment affects the borrower primarily by (a) restricting under what circumstances a loss payable by an insurer may be paid to the borrower/owner, and (b) by placing certain initial and ongoing obligations on the borrower/owner. Initially, among other requirements, the borrower must provide notice of the assignment to the ...
Can You Assign Your Insurance Benefits to Someone Else?
An anti-assignment clause is intended to prevent the insurer from unwittingly assuming risks it never intended to take on. Commercial insurers review business insurance applicants carefully. Before they issue policies, underwriters consider the knowledge and experience of a company's owners and managerial staff. If a business is sold to someone else, the new owners may not be as skilled or ...
Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment
An assignment can be a legal assignment or an equitable assignment. If a legal assignment is required, the assignment must comply with a set of formalities set out in s136 of the Law of Property ...
Understanding Notice of a Claim: Key Timeliness Insights
The situation also highlights the fundamental principle: always provide notice immediately, regardless of the perceived merit of the claim, to ensure coverage is preserved. At the ALS group, we ensure all potential claims are thoroughly reviewed and discussed to determine the best course of action, including reporting and pursuit through insurance.
What is a notice of assignment?
An assignment takes place when one party is holding a right to property, claims, bills, lease, etc., of another party and wishes to pass it along (or sell it) to a third party. ... If a person obligated to perform has received notice of the assignment and still insists on paying the initial assignor, the person will still be obligated to pay ...
Assignment under Insurance Policies
1.1. Effect of Assignment. Immediately on the execution of an assignment of an insurance policy, the assignor forgoes all his rights, title and interest in the policy to the assignee. The premium or loan interest notices etc. in such cases will be sent to the assignee.
Notice of Assignment
Notice of Assignment. This Standard Document is form letter that an assignee of an agreement uses to provide notice to the non-assigning party to the agreement of the assignment. The assignment's effective date marks the transition of responsibilities from the assignor to the assignee, a corporation or other entity type organized in a specific ...
BB&T Insurance Services of Saint Petersburg, FL
BB&T Insurance Services is located at 12485 28th Street N, 2nd Floor Saint Petersburg, FL and BB&T Insurance Services operates in the Insurance industry. Get in Touch. Visit Their Website. Claim Your Profile. email: [email protected] phone: 727-327-7070. fax: 888-632-8451. BB&T Insurance Services ...
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCES Sample Clauses
Additional filters are available in search. Open Search. Related Clauses. Assignment of Insurance; Notice of Assignment; Notification of Assignments
Wade Insurance Services
Wade Insurance Services. , Saint Petersburg, FL. 3209 30th Ave S. Saint Petersburg, FL 33712. Email. Make an appointment. Call 24/7. (727) 866-6311 to quote by phone.
Harbor Insurance Group, Inc. St Petersburg, FL
The value of an independent insurance agent. Independent agents don't work for an insurance company; instead, they sell insurance from multiple companies. That means you always have an expert on your side who can find the best policy, and savings, for you. And as your needs change, your agent will be there to make sure you have the right ...
Crown Insurance Inc.
5301 34th St N, Ste A. St Petersburg, FL 33714. Email. Make an appointment. Call 24/7. (727) 513-2706 to quote by phone. Quote online. View location details & hours.

Insurance Policy Assignment Provisions: What They Are and When Insurers Have to Consent

What Is an Assignment Provision?

Can I Assign My Insurance Policy Without the Insurer’s Consent?

Can an Insurance Company Refuse to Honor an Assignment?

Are Assignment Clauses Enforceable?

What Is an Anti-Assignment Clause in an Insurance Policy?

Further Resources on Insurance Coverage Law

Why Merlin?

Related Posts

Can policy limitations or exclusions be disregarded as illusory?

There’s a Wildfire Burning – What Do I Need to Know About Insurance?

California Enters Wildfire Season Early and in the Midst of an Availability and Affordability Crisis

Expert Insights Delivered to You

Featured Stories

Current Magazine

Post-Loss Assignments of Claims Under Insurance Policies

Written By Robert Redfearn, Jr.

Excess, Surplus & Specialty Markets Directory Vol. II – The Industry’s Leading Coverage Placement Directory

Insurance Jobs

Notice of assignment of insurance policies and form of acknowledgement for an assignment by way of security: single company assignor—bilateral—specific monies

Access this content for free with a 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:

Get your quote today and take step closer to being able to benefit from:

Get a LexisNexis quote

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Popular Links

HELP & SUPPORT

LEGAL SOLUTIONS

Notice of Assignment | Practical Law

Notice of Assignment

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

What issues are there with serving notice of assignment?

Why should we serve a notice of assignment?

Why not serve notice?

What about acknowledgements of notices?

Best practice for serving notice of assignment

Related services

Simply Speaking (May 2020) — Insurance Assignments

Related Attorneys

Lawrence Rutkowski

Michael S. Timpone

Related Practices

Can You Assign Your Insurance Benefits to Someone Else?

Anti-Assignment Clause

Post-Loss Assignments Permitted

Problems With Assignments of Benefits

Avoiding Problems With AOBs

AOBs in Health Insurance

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

Filed under

Popular articles from this firm

Related practical resources PRO

Related research hubs

What is a notice of assignment?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Assignment under Insurance Policies

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS ASSIGNMENT?

Illustration

1.1. Effect of Assignment

1.2. Revocation of Assignment

1.3. Exceptions to Assignment

Pensions, PFs, military benefits etc. Illustration

Illustrations

1.5. Assignment under various laws in India

1.5.1. Under the Indian Contract Act

1.5.2. Under the Insurance Act

1.5.3. Under the Transfer of Property Act

I) Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act

II) Section 131 of the Transfer Of Property Act

III) Section 132 of the Transfer Of Property Act

FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICIES – HOW ASSIGNMENT COMES INTO THE PICTURE

ETHICS OF ASSIGNING LIFE INSURANCE POLICY TO LENDERS

CURRENT STAND OF ICICI REGARDING FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICY, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO ASSIGNMENT OF OBLIGATIONS

Composite Document for Corporate and Realty Funding

ICICI Bank’s Standard Terms and Conditions Governing Consumer Durable Loans

THE ISSUE FACED BY ICICI BANK