research studies on gender

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Current Trends in the study of Gender Norms and Health Behaviors

Paul j fleming, christine agnew-brune.

• Author information
• Copyright and License information

Gender norms are recognized as one of the major social determinants of health and gender norms can have implications for an individual’s health behaviors. This paper reviews the recent advances in research on the role of gender norms on health behaviors most associated with morbidity and mortality. We find that (1) the study of gender norms and health behaviors is varied across different types of health behaviors, (2) research on masculinity and masculine norms appears to have taken on an increasing proportion of studies on the relationship between gender norms and health, and (3) we are seeing new and varied populations integrated into the study of gender norms and health behaviors.

Introduction

Gender is recognized as one of the major social determinants of health. According to the American Psychological Association, gender norms refer to, “the socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for boys and men or girls and women” [ 1 ]. While gender is sometimes viewed as something that an individual is , current social science understandings of gender emphasize that it is something that an individual does through their behaviors and interactions with others [ 2 ]. Thus, a person’s behaviors are critical to their ability to fit into cultural gender norms. These gender norms can play a powerful role in a person’s life since deviating from the norms associated with one’s biological sex can be met with censure from peers, social exclusion, and sometimes even emotional or physical violence [ 3 , 4 ].

Conforming to gender norms can have implications for an individual’s health because certain behaviors considered to be normative for a particular gender may be associated with health outcomes [ 4 , 5 ]. For example, it is normative for men in many cultures to drink alcohol excessively [ 6 ], avoid certain healthy food options [ 7 ], or avoid health-care [ 8 ]. Each of these behaviors has implications for the overall health of men. Similarly, for women, gender norms may have effects such as lessening decision-making power over family planning behaviors [ 9 ] or limiting physical activity out of a concern for appearing less feminine [ 10 ]. The role of gender norms on health behaviors is typically slightly different for men and women. Risky health behaviors are expressions of masculinity for men, but, for women, gender norms can constrain women’s power and limit their ability to take control of their health [ 11 , 12 ]. In both cases, the influence of gender norms on health operates through health behaviors.

In a foundational article, Mokdad and colleagues identify the major health behaviors that are the leading causes of death in the United States [ 13 ]. Below, we review the recent advances in research on the role of gender norms on each of these types of health behaviors. While numerous studies explore gender differences in health behaviors (e.g. differences in smoking patterns between males and females), we focus on those articles that are exploring and explaining how gender norms, masculinity, or femininity influences these behaviors.

Gender and Health Behaviors

Diet and physical activity.

Empirical research on the role of gender norms in diet and physical activity related behaviors is limited and lacks coherent trends. Two articles examined the role of gender dynamics – specifically the role of wives as food-preparers – in men’s eating habits [ 14 , 15 ]. These studies highlight the lack of power and control that men have over their diets because food preparation is a traditionally female domain. Other research explored whether or not food choices are used to construct one’s gender identity. One study found that men sometimes eat meat is because it makes them feel more masculine [ 16 ], and another study showed that women’s choice of being a meat-eater or vegetarian is unrelated to how closely she conforms to feminine norms [ 17 ]. These studies suggest that the choice of eating meat is more associated with masculinity and unrelated to femininity. Another area of this research explores the role of gender norms in eating disorders. Research has long recognized the role of feminine norms in women’s eating disorders related to striving for thinness, but two recent studies have explored how men’s disordered eating may be related to feminine or masculine norms [ 18 , 19 ]. These studies suggest that eating disorders among men may be more related to conformity to constructs of femininity rather than masculinity. Though, muscularity-oriented eating disorders are associated with masculine norms [ 18 ]. Finally, a few recent studies in this area examine media portrayals of diet and physical activity and how they influence men and women. Media portrayals of men depict them as unconcerned about weight issues and that dieting is exclusively a female behavior [ 20 ]. Two other studies showed that consumption of certain types of media (e.g. men’s magazines) were associated with both men and women’s drive for muscularity [ 21 , 22 ]. Taken together, the recent literature suggests research on diet and physical activity is increasingly considering the importance of gender and gender norms but the research is still limited.

Sexual Behaviors

Research on the role of gender norms in sexual behaviors is relatively well-developed compared to other types of health behaviors. In recent years, researchers have continued to add to the evidence that attitudes towards gender norms are associated sexual risk behaviors. These studies find that men who believe in traditional gender roles (i.e. separate roles for men and women) are more likely to have a greater number of sexual partners or avoid condom use [ 23 – 27 ]. Though these studies are not the first to document this relationship, they document this relationship within a wider range of populations and measures. Notably, Nelson finds that there is no relationship for women between attitudes towards gender roles and sexual behaviors, indicating that the mechanism may be more salient for male populations [ 25 ].

Recently, there have been several articles that explore gender dynamics and gender roles within sexual and gender minority populations. For example, two articles explored the concept of ‘gender affirmation’ within transgender individuals sexual risk behaviors [ 28 , 29 ]. Given that penetrative sex is socially constructed as a masculine individual penetrating a feminine individual, these studies find that some transgender women who have sex with a man consider that act to affirm their femininity and status as a woman [ 28 , 29 ]. These transgender women describe seeking out sexual relationships with men or engaging in sex work in order to affirm their feminine identity. Two studies with men who have sex with men similarly demonstrate that sexual roles (insertive vs. receptive sexual partner) usually translate to gender roles where the insertive partner is considered masculine and has greater sexual decision-making power and the receptive partner is feminized and has less power [ 30 , 31 ]. Another study showed that for men who have sex with both men and women, condom use with women is negatively associated with their gender role conflict (i.e. concerns about demonstrating masculine characteristics), but there was no relationship between gender role conflict and their condom use with men [ 32 ]. Each of these studies highlights the ways that gender and power dynamics can vary across different types of relationships and that the resulting association with sexual behaviors can also vary.

Substance Use

Unlike sexual health behaviors, substance use research has a less developed history of examining gender roles. However, recent articles addressing gender norms and their influence on substance use behaviors have typically focused on three content areas: 1) alcohol, 2) tobacco, and 3) other forms of substance misuse, including injection drug use, prescription drug abuse, etc. Articles discussing gender norms and alcohol often linked problematic drinking to different types of masculinity that equated drinking with demonstrating masculine traits [ 33 – 37 ] and also how masculine ideas that discourage help-seeking may prevent men from entering treatment programs [ 38 , 39 ]. Of research examining gender and tobacco, multiple articles focused on men and highlighted that smoking cessation programs can be successful by encouraging positive masculine ideas such as responsibility and fatherhood [ 40 – 43 ]. There was also research suggesting increasing gender equality by challenging traditional gender norms may encourage women to engage in unhealthy behaviors like smoking [ 44 ] and problematic drinking [ 45 , 46 ]. Specifically, women who endorse more equitable roles for men and women may adopt what they view as traditionally masculine behaviors as a means of demonstrating parity. However, other research suggests that increased gender equity may reduce alcohol consumption among both men and women [ 47 ]. Both sets of findings point to the potential importance that gender norms play in substance use and health behaviors writ large and the need to continue to examine it in future studies on substance use. There were few articles that examined gender norms and other forms of substance use beyond alcohol and tobacco. Those that did were focused on the intersection of sexual/violent behaviors, substance use, and gender norms, not on the direct relationship between gender roles and substance use [ 48 , 49 ]. There seems to be an emerging trend to examine the role masculinity plays in substance use; however, more research is needed to better understand conflicting findings and extend beyond alcohol and tobacco to other forms of substance use.

Injury and Violence

The discussion of gender within the field of injury and violence is varied. Research on injuries tended to focus solely on gender differences with the exception of research on suicide which has a well-developed body of literature on the role that masculinity plays in suicide. Several recent articles argue that suicide rates among men are persistently higher than among women due to the difficulty they face attaining traditional masculine norms, including personal autonomy and socio-economic security [ 50 – 52 ]. Further, researchers suggest that adhering to certain masculine norms that discourage help-seeking when emotionally distressed further encourage suicidal behaviors among men [ 53 , 54 ]. Similar to suicide, articles focused on violence have seen a wealth of publications examining the role of gender norms, particularly research focused on gender-based violence. Multiple gender-based violence researchers called for reducing harmful masculine norms in order to encourage increased gender equity and reduce in men’s violence perpetration – including a special issue of the journal Lancet dedicated to this topic. Recently interventions targeting unhealthy masculine norms to decrease gender-based violence have recently shown positive results both in the United States [ 55 ] and globally [ 56 – 58 ]. Intimate partner violence and domestic violence has increasingly moved to focus on primary prevention efforts by targeting perpetrators, typically male, that endorse unhealthy masculine norms [ 59 – 62 ]. While most recent studies on other types of violence (e.g. child abuse, peer violence, youth violence, and sexual aggression) tends to confirm that supporting traditional masculine norms play a role in violence perpetration, one study on sexual aggression found that men who experience high levels of shame about their bodies often react aggressively to women in sexual situations when they perceive that the women is slighting their appearance [ 63 ]. Though injuries and violence are usually categorized together, the literature from the past two years demonstrate the divide between the study of injury and violence with respect to gender roles. Apart from suicide, the examination of gender roles and norms – and masculinity in particular – seems limited to research on violence perpetration.

Preventative Health Behaviors

Preventive health behaviors include those behaviors related to getting vaccines, screened for cancer or other health problems, or seeking help for health problems. Several recent articles explored the role of masculine norms in men’s screening behaviors related to getting a digital rectal exam, including within new populations [ 64 – 67 ]. An article by Christy reviews some of the evidence over the past decade and highlights the specific aspects of masculinity that impact men’s decision to get screened: self-reliance, avoidance of femininity, heterosexual self-presentation, and risk-taking [ 65 ]. One recent study found that even men who do get screened frame their decision within masculine norms, but they focus on the masculine norm of responsibility [ 66 ]. Screening services (e.g. breast and cervical cancer screening) for women were also shown to be related to women’s adherence to masculine norms, but that women who adhered to masculine norms were more likely to be screened rather than less likely.

Seeking health services is often examined through a gender lens. Studies over the past two decades show that women are sometimes constrained by gender norms that limit their decision making power, and several recent studies echoed these ideas in various settings [ 68 – 70 ]. Studies have highlighted men’s avoidance of help-seeking behaviors as a strategy to demonstrate their masculinity [ 71 ]. One recent study explored men’s health seeking behavior in a new way. Sanchez and colleagues interviewed identical male twins where one identified as gay and the other identified as straight [ 72 ]. They showed that the straight men were more likely to endorse traditional masculine norms and less likely to seek health care services than their co-twins. These studies demonstrate the interrelation of sexual identity and gender identity and their role in seeking health services.

Conclusions

There are several key findings and trends to note. First, the study of gender norms and health behaviors is varied across different types of health behaviors. There were far more articles examining gender norms and sexual or violent behaviors, and those fields have had a longer history of researching this relationship. Thus, the studies discussed here are more varied and tackle more dimensions of the relationship. In contrast, research on other types of health behaviors appears to be more nascent, and there were fewer studies to draw upon. Second, research on masculinity and masculine norms appears to have taken on an increasing proportion of studies on the relationship between gender norms and health. Historically, gender studies was often associated with research on women [ 12 ] and focused on the limitations gender norms placed on their health behaviors. But, recently, more articles explore the role that masculinity plays in men’s – and sometimes women’s – risk behaviors. In fact, in 2013, there was a special issue of Health Psychology titled ‘Men’s Health: Masculinity and Other Influences on Male Health Behaviors.’ Third, we are seeing new and varied populations integrated into the study of gender norms and health behaviors. Transgender individuals are a population that is gaining increasing attention in the research on sexual behaviors, and we are seeing research on gay and lesbian populations integrated into research on health behaviors beyond just sexual behaviors [ 73 ]. Researchers are also exploring culturally specific forms of masculinity and/or gender norms in various countries beyond just the United States or Europe.

Researchers need to continue building the evidence base for the relationship between gender norms and health behaviors. To move the field forward, researchers will need to focus on examining the mechanisms by which these norms influence behaviors. Additionally, we need further exploration on how gender norms lead to health outcomes differently for men and women. As a social determinant of health, gender norms play an important role in the health of individuals and documenting and exploring this relationship can help improve health at the population level.

Highlights.

Gender norms play an important role in men and women’s health behaviors

Research on gender norms is most developed in studies of sexual behaviors

Recent studies of gender norms and health behaviors are more focused on masculinity

Gender norms and health research is expanding to new populations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Carolina Population Center for training support (T32 HD007168) and for general support (R24 HD050924). Mr. Fleming was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under grant number T32 AI007001.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Paul J. Fleming, Email: [email protected], Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 302 Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7440, (tel) 630-777-0160, (fax) 919-966-2921

Christine Agnew-Brune, Email: [email protected], Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 302 Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7440.

• 1. American Psychological Association. Answers to your questions about transgender people, gender identity, and gender expression. 2011 [cited 2015 February 1]; Available from: http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/transgender.aspx .
• 2. West C, Zimmerman DH. Doing gender. Gender & Society. 1987;1(2):125–151. [ Google Scholar ]
• 3. Mehta A. Embodied discourse: on gender and fear of violence. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography. 1999;6(1):67–84. [ Google Scholar ]
• 4. Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science and Medicine. 2000;50(10):1385–401. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 5. Saltonstall R. Healthy bodies, social bodies: men’s and women’s concepts and practices of health in everyday life. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(1):7–14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90300-s. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 6. Peralta RL. College alcohol use and the embodiment of hegemonic masculinity among European American men. Sex roles. 2007;56(11–12):741–756. [ Google Scholar ]
• 7. Sobal J. Men, meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food & Foodways. 2005;13(1–2):135–158. [ Google Scholar ]
• 8. Noone JH, Stephens C. Men, masculine identities, and health care utilisation. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2008;30(5):711–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01095.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 9. Li J. Gender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county. Social Science & Medicine. 2004;59(4):695–708. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.041. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 10. Spencer RA, Rehman L, Kirk SF. Understanding gender norms, nutrition, and physical activity in adolescent girls: a scoping review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2015;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0166-8. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 11. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health education & behavior. 2000;27(5):539–565. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700502. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 12. Phillips SP. Defining and measuring gender: A social determinant of health whose time has come. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2005;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-4-11. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 13. Mokdad AH, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Jama. 2004;291(10):1238–45. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 14. Mróz LW, Robertson S. Gender relations and couple negotiations of British men’s food practice changes after prostate cancer. Appetite. 2015;84:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.026. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 15. Hunt K, et al. “You’ve got to walk before you run”: Positive evaluations of a walking program as part of a gender-sensitized, weight-management program delivered to men through professional football clubs. Health Psychology. 2013;32(1):57–65. doi: 10.1037/a0029537. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 16*. Rothgerber H. Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2013;14(4):363–375. Male and female college students make different justifications for their meat-eating habits and men’s justifications are related to norms of masculinity. This study confirms Adam’s theory on the sexual politics of meat. [ Google Scholar ]
• 17. Brinkman BG, et al. Self-objectification, feminist activism and conformity to feminine norms among female vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, and non-vegetarians. Eating Behaviors. 2014;15(1):171–174. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.11.006. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 18*. Griffiths S, Murray SB, Touyz S. Extending the masculinity hypothesis: An investigation of gender role conformity, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in young heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2015;16(1):108–114. This study examined 246 heterosexual men and showed that the more men conformed to masculine norms the more likely they were to have greater muscle dissatisfaction and muscularity-oriented disordered eating. Men who conformed to feminine norms also had muscle dissatisfaction and muscularity-oriented disordered eating, but also had thinness-oriented disordered eating. This article demonstrates the role of both masculinity and femininity in men’s disordered eating. [ Google Scholar ]
• 19. Cella S, Iannaccone M, Cotrufo P. Influence of gender role orientation (masculinity versus femininity) on body satisfaction and eating attitudes in homosexuals, heterosexuals and transsexuals. Eating and Weight Disorders. 2013;18(2):115–124. doi: 10.1007/s40519-013-0017-z. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 20. De Brún A, et al. ‘Fat is your fault’. Gatekeepers to health, attributions of responsibility and the portrayal of gender in the Irish media representation of obesity. Appetite. 2013;62:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.005. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 21. Slater A, Tiggemann M. Media matters for boys too! The role of specific magazine types and television programs in the drive for thinness and muscularity in adolescent boys. Eating Behaviors. 2014;15(4):679–682. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.10.002. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 22. Cramblitt B, Pritchard M. Media’s influence on the drive for muscularity in undergraduates. Eating Behaviors. 2013;14(4):441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.08.003. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 23. Silver EJ, Bauman LJ. Association of “macho man” sexual attitudes and behavioral risks in urban adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education. 2014;9(2):176–187. [ Google Scholar ]
• 24. Hembling J, Andrinopoulos K. Evidence of increased STI/HIV-related risk behavior among male perpetrators of intimate partner violence in Guatemala: Results from a national survey. AIDS Care. 2014;26(11):1411–1418. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.913766. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 25. Nelson LE, Thach CT, Zhang N. Gender equity predicts condom use among adolescent and young adult parents in Toronto, Canada. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2014;23(1):19–26. [ Google Scholar ]
• 26. Kennedy DP, et al. Masculinity and HIV risk among homeless men in Los Angeles. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2013;14(2):156–167. doi: 10.1037/a0027570. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 27. Shattuck D, et al. Using the inequitable gender norms scale and associated HIV risk behaviors among men at high risk for HIV in Ghana and Tanzania. Men and Masculinities. 2013;16(5):540–559. [ Google Scholar ]
• 28. Feldman J, Romine RS, Bockting WO. HIV risk behaviors in the U.S. transgender population: Prevalence and predictors in a large Internet sample. Journal of Homosexuality. 2014;61(11):1558–1588. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.944048. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 29**. Sevelius JM. Gender affirmation: A framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color. Sex Roles. 2013;68(11–12):675–689. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0216-5. This article explores the idea of gender affirmation as a reason for risk behaviors among transgender women. They use empirical evidence to show that sex with men is part of some transgender women’s ‘gender affirmation’ where they are able to feel more feminine. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 30. Clark J, et al. Moderno love: Sexual role-based identities and HIV/STI prevention among men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru. AIDS and Behavior. 2013;17(4):1313–1328. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0210-5. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 31**. Kubicek K, McNeeley M, Collins S. ‘Same-sex relationship in a straight world’: Individual and societal influences on power and control in young men’s relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2015;30(1):83–109. doi: 10.1177/0886260514532527. This article reports on interviews with young men who have sex with men. These men describe how different sexual behaviors can create and establish power hierarchies within male-male relationships and how these power hierarchies can lead to risky sexual behaviors or violence. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 32*. Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Williams JK. Gender role conflict among African American men who have sex with men and women: Associations with mental health and sexual risk and disclosure behaviors. American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(1):127–133. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300855. This article takes an important step in exploring the influence of gender by examining the relationship between gender role conflict and men’s sexual behaviors with women and with other men. They show that the relationships are different depending on the biological sex of their sexual partner and therefore the relationships between gender norms and sexual behaviors may be very nuanced. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 33. Wells S, et al. Linking masculinity to negative drinking consequences: the mediating roles of heavy episodic drinking and alcohol expectancies. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(3):510–9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.510. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 34. Vaughan EL, Wong YJ, Middendorf KG. Gender roles and binge drinking among Latino emerging adults: a latent class regression analysis. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(3):719–26. doi: 10.1037/a0037406. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 35. Miller P, et al. Alcohol, masculinity, honour and male barroom aggression in an Australian sample. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014;33(2):136–43. doi: 10.1111/dar.12114. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 36. Lindsay J. The gendered trouble with alcohol: young people managing alcohol related violence. Int J Drug Policy. 2012;23(3):236–41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.12.002. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 37. Iwamoto DK, Smiler AP. Alcohol makes you macho and helps you make friends: the role of masculine norms and peer pressure in adolescent boys’ and girls’ alcohol use. Subst Use Misuse. 2013;48(5):371–8. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.765479. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 38. Hanpatchaiyakul K, et al. Thai men’s experiences of alcohol addiction and treatment. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23712. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23712. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 39. Emslie C, Hunt K, Lyons A. The role of alcohol in forging and maintaining friendships amongst Scottish men in midlife. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):33–41. doi: 10.1037/a0029874. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 40*. White C, Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. Fatherhood, smoking, and secondhand smoke in North America: an historical analysis with a view to contemporary practice. Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(2):146–55. doi: 10.1177/1557988311425852. Researchers posited that men’s secondhand smoke in family environments is a gendered phenomenon that is impacted by the history of smoking that positioned smoking as a masculine act. Authors suggest that because fatherhood is also an expression of masculinity it may be harnessed to promote a culture of masculine identity that is defined in terms of caring for one’s children and others in an effort to promote smoking cessation. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 41. Kwon JY, et al. Masculinity and Fatherhood: New Fathers’ Perceptions of Their Female Partners’ Efforts to Assist Them to Reduce or Quit Smoking. Am J Mens Health. 2014 doi: 10.1177/1557988314545627. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 42. Kwon JY, et al. Heterosexual gender relations and masculinity in fathers who smoke. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37(5):391–8. doi: 10.1002/nur.21614. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 43. Greaves L. Can tobacco control be transformative? Reducing gender inequity and tobacco use among vulnerable populations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(1):792–803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110100792. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 44. McKelvey K, et al. Determinants of Cigarette Smoking Initiation in Jordanian Schoolchildren: Longitudinal Analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu165. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 45*. Mejia R, et al. Influence of gender role attitudes on smoking and drinking among girls from Jujuy, Argentina. Prev Med. 2013;57(3):194–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.011. Researchers examined the affect gender role attitudes have on tobacco and alcohol consumption among adolescent women in Argentina. Findings suggest that women that endorsed more egalitarian gender roles had higher odds of smoking of problematic drinking than women who did not. The authors suggest that unless unhealthy male gender norms are targeted to also discourage tobacco and alcohol consumption, there is a risk that women will adopt these unhealthy norms in an effort to achieve gender parity. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 46. de Visser RO, McDonnell EJ. ‘That’s OK. He’s a guy’: a mixed-methods study of gender double-standards for alcohol use. Psychol Health. 2012;27(5):618–39. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.617444. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 47. Roberts SC. Macro-level gender equality and alcohol consumption: a multi-level analysis across U.S. States. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(1):60–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.017. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 48. Cowley AD. “Let’s get drunk and have sex”: the complex relationship of alcohol, gender, and sexual victimization. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(7):1258–78. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506289. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 49. Reid SD, Malow RM, Rosenberg R. Alcohol, drugs, sexual behavior, and HIV in Trinidad and Tobago--the way forward. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) 2012;11(1):66–82. doi: 10.1177/1545109711416245. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 50. Rhodes AE, et al. Antecedents and sex/gender differences in youth suicidal behavior. World J Psychiatry. 2014;4(4):120–32. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v4.i4.120. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 51. Pitts-Tucker T. Pressure to keep up macho image might be behind rise in suicides among men. Bmj. 2012;345:e6356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6356. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 52. Oliffe JL, et al. Men, Masculinities, and Murder-Suicide. Am J Mens Health. 2014 doi: 10.1177/1557988314551359. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 53*. Cleary A. Suicidal action, emotional expression, and the performance of masculinities. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(4):498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.002. As male rates of suicide persist to be higher than female in many Western countries, quantitative approaches to studying potential explanations may not be capturing the myriad issues influencing this behavior. The author interviewed 52 men who had attempted suicide to examine suicide behavior at the individual level. Findings suggest that men who attempt suicide are reluctant to seek help for their emotional distress due to perceived masculine norms that discourage emotional vulnerability. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 54. Scourfield J, et al. Sociological autopsy: an integrated approach to the study of suicide in men. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(4):466–73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.054. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 55. Miller E, et al. “Coaching boys into men”: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(5):431–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.018. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 56. Miller E, et al. Evaluation of a gender-based violence prevention program for student athletes in Mumbai, India. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(4):758–78. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505205. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 57. Taft A, Small R. Preventing and reducing violence against women: innovation in community-level studies. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0155-9. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 58. Gurman TA, et al. ‘By seeing with our own eyes, it can remain in our mind’: qualitative evaluation findings suggest the ability of participatory video to reduce gender-based violence in conflict-affected settings. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(4):690–701. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu018. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 59. Towns AJ, Terry G. “You’re in that realm of unpredictability”: mateship, loyalty, and men challenging men who use domestic violence against women. Violence Against Women. 2014;20(8):1012–36. doi: 10.1177/1077801214546232. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 60. O’Leary KD, Slep AM. Prevention of partner violence by focusing on behaviors of both young males and females. Prev Sci. 2012;13(4):329–39. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0237-2. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 61. Das A, et al. Reviewing responsibilities and renewing relationships: an intervention with men on violence against women in India. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(6):659–75. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.677477. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 62. Corbally M. Accounting for Intimate Partner Violence: A Biographical Analysis of Narrative Strategies Used by Men Experiencing IPV From Their Female Partners. J Interpers Violence. 2014 doi: 10.1177/0886260514554429. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 63. Mescher K, Rudman LA. Men in the Mirror: The Role of Men’s Body Shame in Sexual Aggression. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014;40(8):1063–1075. doi: 10.1177/0146167214535641. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 64. Ng P, et al. Factors influencing prostate cancer healthcare practices in Barbados, West Indies. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2013;15(3):653–660. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9654-y. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 65. Christy SM, Mosher CE, Rawl SM. Integrating men’s health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2014;8(1):54–65. doi: 10.1177/1557988313492171. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 66**. Oster C, et al. Masculinity and Men’s Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2014 Men who received a colorectal screening rationalized their willingness to receive a screening in terms of their own masculinity. They reported that they were able to emphasize their rationality, control, and risk through their screening. [ Google Scholar ]
• 67. Ocho ON, Green J. Perception of prostate screening services among men in Trinidad and Tobago. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC. 2013;10(3):186–192. [ Google Scholar ]
• 68. Garrett JJ, Barrington C. ‘We do the impossible’: Women overcoming barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Honduras—A positive deviance analysis. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2013;15(6):637–651. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.760206. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 69. Caal S, et al. ‘Because you’re on birth control, it automatically makes you promiscuous or something”: Latina women’s perceptions of parental approval to use reproductive health care. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2013;53(5):617–622. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.05.003. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 70. Singh K, Haney E, Olorunsaiye C. Maternal autonomy and attitudes towards gender norms: Associations with childhood immunization in Nigeria. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2013;17(5):837–841. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1060-5. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 71. Odimegwu C, Pallikadavath S, Adedini S. The cost of being a man: Social and health consequences of Igbo masculinity. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2013;15(2):219–234. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.747700. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 72**. Sanchez FJ, Bocklandt S, Vilain E. The relationship between help-seeking attitudes and masculine norms among monozygotic male twins discordant for sexual orientation. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):52–6. doi: 10.1037/a0029529. This unique study compares identical male twins where one identifies as gay and the other identifies as straight. The researchers show that the gay men are more likely to seek-help for health issues than the straight men. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 73. Lee JG, et al. Promotion of tobacco use cessation for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(6):823–31. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.051. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (83.3 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator

Contributed equally to this work with: Paola Belingheri, Filippo Chiarello, Andrea Fronzetti Colladon, Paola Rovelli

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Energia, dei Sistemi, del Territorio e delle Costruzioni, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino, Pisa, Italy

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy, Department of Management, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Faculty of Economics and Management, Centre for Family Business Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

• Paola Belingheri, 
• Filippo Chiarello, 
• Andrea Fronzetti Colladon, 
• Paola Rovelli

• Published: September 21, 2021
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474
• Reader Comments

9 Nov 2021: The PLOS ONE Staff (2021) Correction: Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator. PLOS ONE 16(11): e0259930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259930 View correction

Gender equality is a major problem that places women at a disadvantage thereby stymieing economic growth and societal advancement. In the last two decades, extensive research has been conducted on gender related issues, studying both their antecedents and consequences. However, existing literature reviews fail to provide a comprehensive and clear picture of what has been studied so far, which could guide scholars in their future research. Our paper offers a scoping review of a large portion of the research that has been published over the last 22 years, on gender equality and related issues, with a specific focus on business and economics studies. Combining innovative methods drawn from both network analysis and text mining, we provide a synthesis of 15,465 scientific articles. We identify 27 main research topics, we measure their relevance from a semantic point of view and the relationships among them, highlighting the importance of each topic in the overall gender discourse. We find that prominent research topics mostly relate to women in the workforce–e.g., concerning compensation, role, education, decision-making and career progression. However, some of them are losing momentum, and some other research trends–for example related to female entrepreneurship, leadership and participation in the board of directors–are on the rise. Besides introducing a novel methodology to review broad literature streams, our paper offers a map of the main gender-research trends and presents the most popular and the emerging themes, as well as their intersections, outlining important avenues for future research.

Citation: Belingheri P, Chiarello F, Fronzetti Colladon A, Rovelli P (2021) Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0256474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474

Editor: Elisa Ughetto, Politecnico di Torino, ITALY

Received: June 25, 2021; Accepted: August 6, 2021; Published: September 21, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Belingheri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files. The only exception is the text of the abstracts (over 15,000) that we have downloaded from Scopus. These abstracts can be retrieved from Scopus, but we do not have permission to redistribute them.

Funding: P.B and F.C.: Grant of the Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction of the University of Pisa (DESTEC) for the project “Measuring Gender Bias with Semantic Analysis: The Development of an Assessment Tool and its Application in the European Space Industry. P.B., F.C., A.F.C., P.R.: Grant of the Italian Association of Management Engineering (AiIG), “Misure di sostegno ai soci giovani AiIG” 2020, for the project “Gender Equality Through Data Intelligence (GEDI)”. F.C.: EU project ASSETs+ Project (Alliance for Strategic Skills addressing Emerging Technologies in Defence) EAC/A03/2018 - Erasmus+ programme, Sector Skills Alliances, Lot 3: Sector Skills Alliance for implementing a new strategic approach (Blueprint) to sectoral cooperation on skills G.A. NUMBER: 612678-EPP-1-2019-1-IT-EPPKA2-SSA-B.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The persistent gender inequalities that currently exist across the developed and developing world are receiving increasing attention from economists, policymakers, and the general public [e.g., 1 – 3 ]. Economic studies have indicated that women’s education and entry into the workforce contributes to social and economic well-being [e.g., 4 , 5 ], while their exclusion from the labor market and from managerial positions has an impact on overall labor productivity and income per capita [ 6 , 7 ]. The United Nations selected gender equality, with an emphasis on female education, as part of the Millennium Development Goals [ 8 ], and gender equality at-large as one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be achieved by 2030 [ 9 ]. These latter objectives involve not only developing nations, but rather all countries, to achieve economic, social and environmental well-being.

As is the case with many SDGs, gender equality is still far from being achieved and persists across education, access to opportunities, or presence in decision-making positions [ 7 , 10 , 11 ]. As we enter the last decade for the SDGs’ implementation, and while we are battling a global health pandemic, effective and efficient action becomes paramount to reach this ambitious goal.

Scholars have dedicated a massive effort towards understanding gender equality, its determinants, its consequences for women and society, and the appropriate actions and policies to advance women’s equality. Many topics have been covered, ranging from women’s education and human capital [ 12 , 13 ] and their role in society [e.g., 14 , 15 ], to their appointment in firms’ top ranked positions [e.g., 16 , 17 ] and performance implications [e.g., 18 , 19 ]. Despite some attempts, extant literature reviews provide a narrow view on these issues, restricted to specific topics–e.g., female students’ presence in STEM fields [ 20 ], educational gender inequality [ 5 ], the gender pay gap [ 21 ], the glass ceiling effect [ 22 ], leadership [ 23 ], entrepreneurship [ 24 ], women’s presence on the board of directors [ 25 , 26 ], diversity management [ 27 ], gender stereotypes in advertisement [ 28 ], or specific professions [ 29 ]. A comprehensive view on gender-related research, taking stock of key findings and under-studied topics is thus lacking.

Extant literature has also highlighted that gender issues, and their economic and social ramifications, are complex topics that involve a large number of possible antecedents and outcomes [ 7 ]. Indeed, gender equality actions are most effective when implemented in unison with other SDGs (e.g., with SDG 8, see [ 30 ]) in a synergetic perspective [ 10 ]. Many bodies of literature (e.g., business, economics, development studies, sociology and psychology) approach the problem of achieving gender equality from different perspectives–often addressing specific and narrow aspects. This sometimes leads to a lack of clarity about how different issues, circumstances, and solutions may be related in precipitating or mitigating gender inequality or its effects. As the number of papers grows at an increasing pace, this issue is exacerbated and there is a need to step back and survey the body of gender equality literature as a whole. There is also a need to examine synergies between different topics and approaches, as well as gaps in our understanding of how different problems and solutions work together. Considering the important topic of women’s economic and social empowerment, this paper aims to fill this gap by answering the following research question: what are the most relevant findings in the literature on gender equality and how do they relate to each other ?

To do so, we conduct a scoping review [ 31 ], providing a synthesis of 15,465 articles dealing with gender equity related issues published in the last twenty-two years, covering both the periods of the MDGs and the SDGs (i.e., 2000 to mid 2021) in all the journals indexed in the Academic Journal Guide’s 2018 ranking of business and economics journals. Given the huge amount of research conducted on the topic, we adopt an innovative methodology, which relies on social network analysis and text mining. These techniques are increasingly adopted when surveying large bodies of text. Recently, they were applied to perform analysis of online gender communication differences [ 32 ] and gender behaviors in online technology communities [ 33 ], to identify and classify sexual harassment instances in academia [ 34 ], and to evaluate the gender inclusivity of disaster management policies [ 35 ].

Applied to the title, abstracts and keywords of the articles in our sample, this methodology allows us to identify a set of 27 recurrent topics within which we automatically classify the papers. Introducing additional novelty, by means of the Semantic Brand Score (SBS) indicator [ 36 ] and the SBS BI app [ 37 ], we assess the importance of each topic in the overall gender equality discourse and its relationships with the other topics, as well as trends over time, with a more accurate description than that offered by traditional literature reviews relying solely on the number of papers presented in each topic.

This methodology, applied to gender equality research spanning the past twenty-two years, enables two key contributions. First, we extract the main message that each document is conveying and how this is connected to other themes in literature, providing a rich picture of the topics that are at the center of the discourse, as well as of the emerging topics. Second, by examining the semantic relationship between topics and how tightly their discourses are linked, we can identify the key relationships and connections between different topics. This semi-automatic methodology is also highly reproducible with minimum effort.

This literature review is organized as follows. In the next section, we present how we selected relevant papers and how we analyzed them through text mining and social network analysis. We then illustrate the importance of 27 selected research topics, measured by means of the SBS indicator. In the results section, we present an overview of the literature based on the SBS results–followed by an in-depth narrative analysis of the top 10 topics (i.e., those with the highest SBS) and their connections. Subsequently, we highlight a series of under-studied connections between the topics where there is potential for future research. Through this analysis, we build a map of the main gender-research trends in the last twenty-two years–presenting the most popular themes. We conclude by highlighting key areas on which research should focused in the future.

Our aim is to map a broad topic, gender equality research, that has been approached through a host of different angles and through different disciplines. Scoping reviews are the most appropriate as they provide the freedom to map different themes and identify literature gaps, thereby guiding the recommendation of new research agendas [ 38 ].

Several practical approaches have been proposed to identify and assess the underlying topics of a specific field using big data [ 39 – 41 ], but many of them fail without proper paper retrieval and text preprocessing. This is specifically true for a research field such as the gender-related one, which comprises the work of scholars from different backgrounds. In this section, we illustrate a novel approach for the analysis of scientific (gender-related) papers that relies on methods and tools of social network analysis and text mining. Our procedure has four main steps: (1) data collection, (2) text preprocessing, (3) keywords extraction and classification, and (4) evaluation of semantic importance and image.

Data collection

In this study, we analyze 22 years of literature on gender-related research. Following established practice for scoping reviews [ 42 ], our data collection consisted of two main steps, which we summarize here below.

Firstly, we retrieved from the Scopus database all the articles written in English that contained the term “gender” in their title, abstract or keywords and were published in a journal listed in the Academic Journal Guide 2018 ranking of the Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS) ( https://charteredabs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AJG2018-Methodology.pdf ), considering the time period from Jan 2000 to May 2021. We used this information considering that abstracts, titles and keywords represent the most informative part of a paper, while using the full-text would increase the signal-to-noise ratio for information extraction. Indeed, these textual elements already demonstrated to be reliable sources of information for the task of domain lexicon extraction [ 43 , 44 ]. We chose Scopus as source of literature because of its popularity, its update rate, and because it offers an API to ease the querying process. Indeed, while it does not allow to retrieve the full text of scientific articles, the Scopus API offers access to titles, abstracts, citation information and metadata for all its indexed scholarly journals. Moreover, we decided to focus on the journals listed in the AJG 2018 ranking because we were interested in reviewing business and economics related gender studies only. The AJG is indeed widely used by universities and business schools as a reference point for journal and research rigor and quality. This first step, executed in June 2021, returned more than 55,000 papers.

In the second step–because a look at the papers showed very sparse results, many of which were not in line with the topic of this literature review (e.g., papers dealing with health care or medical issues, where the word gender indicates the gender of the patients)–we applied further inclusion criteria to make the sample more focused on the topic of this literature review (i.e., women’s gender equality issues). Specifically, we only retained those papers mentioning, in their title and/or abstract, both gender-related keywords (e.g., daughter, female, mother) and keywords referring to bias and equality issues (e.g., equality, bias, diversity, inclusion). After text pre-processing (see next section), keywords were first identified from a frequency-weighted list of words found in the titles, abstracts and keywords in the initial list of papers, extracted through text mining (following the same approach as [ 43 ]). They were selected by two of the co-authors independently, following respectively a bottom up and a top-down approach. The bottom-up approach consisted of examining the words found in the frequency-weighted list and classifying those related to gender and equality. The top-down approach consisted in searching in the word list for notable gender and equality-related words. Table 1 reports the sets of keywords we considered, together with some examples of words that were used to search for their presence in the dataset (a full list is provided in the S1 Text ). At end of this second step, we obtained a final sample of 15,465 relevant papers.

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.t001

Text processing and keyword extraction

Text preprocessing aims at structuring text into a form that can be analyzed by statistical models. In the present section, we describe the preprocessing steps we applied to paper titles and abstracts, which, as explained below, partially follow a standard text preprocessing pipeline [ 45 ]. These activities have been performed using the R package udpipe [ 46 ].

The first step is n-gram extraction (i.e., a sequence of words from a given text sample) to identify which n-grams are important in the analysis, since domain-specific lexicons are often composed by bi-grams and tri-grams [ 47 ]. Multi-word extraction is usually implemented with statistics and linguistic rules, thus using the statistical properties of n-grams or machine learning approaches [ 48 ]. However, for the present paper, we used Scopus metadata in order to have a more effective and efficient n-grams collection approach [ 49 ]. We used the keywords of each paper in order to tag n-grams with their associated keywords automatically. Using this greedy approach, it was possible to collect all the keywords listed by the authors of the papers. From this list, we extracted only keywords composed by two, three and four words, we removed all the acronyms and rare keywords (i.e., appearing in less than 1% of papers), and we clustered keywords showing a high orthographic similarity–measured using a Levenshtein distance [ 50 ] lower than 2, considering these groups of keywords as representing same concepts, but expressed with different spelling. After tagging the n-grams in the abstracts, we followed a common data preparation pipeline that consists of the following steps: (i) tokenization, that splits the text into tokens (i.e., single words and previously tagged multi-words); (ii) removal of stop-words (i.e. those words that add little meaning to the text, usually being very common and short functional words–such as “and”, “or”, or “of”); (iii) parts-of-speech tagging, that is providing information concerning the morphological role of a word and its morphosyntactic context (e.g., if the token is a determiner, the next token is a noun or an adjective with very high confidence, [ 51 ]); and (iv) lemmatization, which consists in substituting each word with its dictionary form (or lemma). The output of the latter step allows grouping together the inflected forms of a word. For example, the verbs “am”, “are”, and “is” have the shared lemma “be”, or the nouns “cat” and “cats” both share the lemma “cat”. We preferred lemmatization over stemming [ 52 ] in order to obtain more interpretable results.

In addition, we identified a further set of keywords (with respect to those listed in the “keywords” field) by applying a series of automatic words unification and removal steps, as suggested in past research [ 53 , 54 ]. We removed: sparse terms (i.e., occurring in less than 0.1% of all documents), common terms (i.e., occurring in more than 10% of all documents) and retained only nouns and adjectives. It is relevant to notice that no document was lost due to these steps. We then used the TF-IDF function [ 55 ] to produce a new list of keywords. We additionally tested other approaches for the identification and clustering of keywords–such as TextRank [ 56 ] or Latent Dirichlet Allocation [ 57 ]–without obtaining more informative results.

Classification of research topics

To guide the literature analysis, two experts met regularly to examine the sample of collected papers and to identify the main topics and trends in gender research. Initially, they conducted brainstorming sessions on the topics they expected to find, due to their knowledge of the literature. This led to an initial list of topics. Subsequently, the experts worked independently, also supported by the keywords in paper titles and abstracts extracted with the procedure described above.

Considering all this information, each expert identified and clustered relevant keywords into topics. At the end of the process, the two assignments were compared and exhibited a 92% agreement. Another meeting was held to discuss discordant cases and reach a consensus. This resulted in a list of 27 topics, briefly introduced in Table 2 and subsequently detailed in the following sections.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.t002

Evaluation of semantic importance

Working on the lemmatized corpus of the 15,465 papers included in our sample, we proceeded with the evaluation of semantic importance trends for each topic and with the analysis of their connections and prevalent textual associations. To this aim, we used the Semantic Brand Score indicator [ 36 ], calculated through the SBS BI webapp [ 37 ] that also produced a brand image report for each topic. For this study we relied on the computing resources of the ENEA/CRESCO infrastructure [ 58 ].

The Semantic Brand Score (SBS) is a measure of semantic importance that combines methods of social network analysis and text mining. It is usually applied for the analysis of (big) textual data to evaluate the importance of one or more brands, names, words, or sets of keywords [ 36 ]. Indeed, the concept of “brand” is intended in a flexible way and goes beyond products or commercial brands. In this study, we evaluate the SBS time-trends of the keywords defining the research topics discussed in the previous section. Semantic importance comprises the three dimensions of topic prevalence, diversity and connectivity. Prevalence measures how frequently a research topic is used in the discourse. The more a topic is mentioned by scientific articles, the more the research community will be aware of it, with possible increase of future studies; this construct is partly related to that of brand awareness [ 59 ]. This effect is even stronger, considering that we are analyzing the title, abstract and keywords of the papers, i.e. the parts that have the highest visibility. A very important characteristic of the SBS is that it considers the relationships among words in a text. Topic importance is not just a matter of how frequently a topic is mentioned, but also of the associations a topic has in the text. Specifically, texts are transformed into networks of co-occurring words, and relationships are studied through social network analysis [ 60 ]. This step is necessary to calculate the other two dimensions of our semantic importance indicator. Accordingly, a social network of words is generated for each time period considered in the analysis–i.e., a graph made of n nodes (words) and E edges weighted by co-occurrence frequency, with W being the set of edge weights. The keywords representing each topic were clustered into single nodes.

The construct of diversity relates to that of brand image [ 59 ], in the sense that it considers the richness and distinctiveness of textual (topic) associations. Considering the above-mentioned networks, we calculated diversity using the distinctiveness centrality metric–as in the formula presented by Fronzetti Colladon and Naldi [ 61 ].

Lastly, connectivity was measured as the weighted betweenness centrality [ 62 , 63 ] of each research topic node. We used the formula presented by Wasserman and Faust [ 60 ]. The dimension of connectivity represents the “brokerage power” of each research topic–i.e., how much it can serve as a bridge to connect other terms (and ultimately topics) in the discourse [ 36 ].

The SBS is the final composite indicator obtained by summing the standardized scores of prevalence, diversity and connectivity. Standardization was carried out considering all the words in the corpus, for each specific timeframe.

This methodology, applied to a large and heterogeneous body of text, enables to automatically identify two important sets of information that add value to the literature review. Firstly, the relevance of each topic in literature is measured through a composite indicator of semantic importance, rather than simply looking at word frequencies. This provides a much richer picture of the topics that are at the center of the discourse, as well as of the topics that are emerging in the literature. Secondly, it enables to examine the extent of the semantic relationship between topics, looking at how tightly their discourses are linked. In a field such as gender equality, where many topics are closely linked to each other and present overlaps in issues and solutions, this methodology offers a novel perspective with respect to traditional literature reviews. In addition, it ensures reproducibility over time and the possibility to semi-automatically update the analysis, as new papers become available.

Overview of main topics

In terms of descriptive textual statistics, our corpus is made of 15,465 text documents, consisting of a total of 2,685,893 lemmatized tokens (words) and 32,279 types. As a result, the type-token ratio is 1.2%. The number of hapaxes is 12,141, with a hapax-token ratio of 37.61%.

Fig 1 shows the list of 27 topics by decreasing SBS. The most researched topic is compensation , exceeding all others in prevalence, diversity, and connectivity. This means it is not only mentioned more often than other topics, but it is also connected to a greater number of other topics and is central to the discourse on gender equality. The next four topics are, in order of SBS, role , education , decision-making , and career progression . These topics, except for education , all concern women in the workforce. Between these first five topics and the following ones there is a clear drop in SBS scores. In particular, the topics that follow have a lower connectivity than the first five. They are hiring , performance , behavior , organization , and human capital . Again, except for behavior and human capital , the other three topics are purely related to women in the workforce. After another drop-off, the following topics deal prevalently with women in society. This trend highlights that research on gender in business journals has so far mainly paid attention to the conditions that women experience in business contexts, while also devoting some attention to women in society.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.g001

Fig 2 shows the SBS time series of the top 10 topics. While there has been a general increase in the number of Scopus-indexed publications in the last decade, we notice that some SBS trends remain steady, or even decrease. In particular, we observe that the main topic of the last twenty-two years, compensation , is losing momentum. Since 2016, it has been surpassed by decision-making , education and role , which may indicate that literature is increasingly attempting to identify root causes of compensation inequalities. Moreover, in the last two years, the topics of hiring , performance , and organization are experiencing the largest importance increase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.g002

Fig 3 shows the SBS time trends of the remaining 17 topics (i.e., those not in the top 10). As we can see from the graph, there are some that maintain a steady trend–such as reputation , management , networks and governance , which also seem to have little importance. More relevant topics with average stationary trends (except for the last two years) are culture , family , and parenting . The feminine topic is among the most important here, and one of those that exhibit the larger variations over time (similarly to leadership ). On the other hand, the are some topics that, even if not among the most important, show increasing SBS trends; therefore, they could be considered as emerging topics and could become popular in the near future. These are entrepreneurship , leadership , board of directors , and sustainability . These emerging topics are also interesting to anticipate future trends in gender equality research that are conducive to overall equality in society.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.g003

In addition to the SBS score of the different topics, the network of terms they are associated to enables to gauge the extent to which their images (textual associations) overlap or differ ( Fig 4 ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.g004

There is a central cluster of topics with high similarity, which are all connected with women in the workforce. The cluster includes topics such as organization , decision-making , performance , hiring , human capital , education and compensation . In addition, the topic of well-being is found within this cluster, suggesting that women’s equality in the workforce is associated to well-being considerations. The emerging topics of entrepreneurship and leadership are also closely connected with each other, possibly implying that leadership is a much-researched quality in female entrepreneurship. Topics that are relatively more distant include personality , politics , feminine , empowerment , management , board of directors , reputation , governance , parenting , masculine and network .

The following sections describe the top 10 topics and their main associations in literature (see Table 3 ), while providing a brief overview of the emerging topics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.t003

Compensation.

The topic of compensation is related to the topics of role , hiring , education and career progression , however, also sees a very high association with the words gap and inequality . Indeed, a well-known debate in degrowth economics centers around whether and how to adequately compensate women for their childbearing, childrearing, caregiver and household work [e.g., 30 ].

Even in paid work, women continue being offered lower compensations than their male counterparts who have the same job or cover the same role [ 64 – 67 ]. This severe inequality has been widely studied by scholars over the last twenty-two years. Dealing with this topic, some specific roles have been addressed. Specifically, research highlighted differences in compensation between female and male CEOs [e.g., 68 ], top executives [e.g., 69 ], and boards’ directors [e.g., 70 ]. Scholars investigated the determinants of these gaps, such as the gender composition of the board [e.g., 71 – 73 ] or women’s individual characteristics [e.g., 71 , 74 ].

Among these individual characteristics, education plays a relevant role [ 75 ]. Education is indeed presented as the solution for women, not only to achieve top executive roles, but also to reduce wage inequality [e.g., 76 , 77 ]. Past research has highlighted education influences on gender wage gaps, specifically referring to gender differences in skills [e.g., 78 ], college majors [e.g., 79 ], and college selectivity [e.g., 80 ].

Finally, the wage gap issue is strictly interrelated with hiring –e.g., looking at whether being a mother affects hiring and compensation [e.g., 65 , 81 ] or relating compensation to unemployment [e.g., 82 ]–and career progression –for instance looking at meritocracy [ 83 , 84 ] or the characteristics of the boss for whom women work [e.g., 85 ].

The roles covered by women have been deeply investigated. Scholars have focused on the role of women in their families and the society as a whole [e.g., 14 , 15 ], and, more widely, in business contexts [e.g., 18 , 81 ]. Indeed, despite still lagging behind their male counterparts [e.g., 86 , 87 ], in the last decade there has been an increase in top ranked positions achieved by women [e.g., 88 , 89 ]. Following this phenomenon, scholars have posed greater attention towards the presence of women in the board of directors [e.g., 16 , 18 , 90 , 91 ], given the increasing pressure to appoint female directors that firms, especially listed ones, have experienced. Other scholars have focused on the presence of women covering the role of CEO [e.g., 17 , 92 ] or being part of the top management team [e.g., 93 ]. Irrespectively of the level of analysis, all these studies tried to uncover the antecedents of women’s presence among top managers [e.g., 92 , 94 ] and the consequences of having a them involved in the firm’s decision-making –e.g., on performance [e.g., 19 , 95 , 96 ], risk [e.g., 97 , 98 ], and corporate social responsibility [e.g., 99 , 100 ].

Besides studying the difficulties and discriminations faced by women in getting a job [ 81 , 101 ], and, more specifically in the hiring , appointment, or career progression to these apical roles [e.g., 70 , 83 ], the majority of research of women’s roles dealt with compensation issues. Specifically, scholars highlight the pay-gap that still exists between women and men, both in general [e.g., 64 , 65 ], as well as referring to boards’ directors [e.g., 70 , 102 ], CEOs and executives [e.g., 69 , 103 , 104 ].

Finally, other scholars focused on the behavior of women when dealing with business. In this sense, particular attention has been paid to leadership and entrepreneurial behaviors. The former quite overlaps with dealing with the roles mentioned above, but also includes aspects such as leaders being stereotyped as masculine [e.g., 105 ], the need for greater exposure to female leaders to reduce biases [e.g., 106 ], or female leaders acting as queen bees [e.g., 107 ]. Regarding entrepreneurship , scholars mainly investigated women’s entrepreneurial entry [e.g., 108 , 109 ], differences between female and male entrepreneurs in the evaluations and funding received from investors [e.g., 110 , 111 ], and their performance gap [e.g., 112 , 113 ].

Education has long been recognized as key to social advancement and economic stability [ 114 ], for job progression and also a barrier to gender equality, especially in STEM-related fields. Research on education and gender equality is mostly linked with the topics of compensation , human capital , career progression , hiring , parenting and decision-making .

Education contributes to a higher human capital [ 115 ] and constitutes an investment on the part of women towards their future. In this context, literature points to the gender gap in educational attainment, and the consequences for women from a social, economic, personal and professional standpoint. Women are found to have less access to formal education and information, especially in emerging countries, which in turn may cause them to lose social and economic opportunities [e.g., 12 , 116 – 119 ]. Education in local and rural communities is also paramount to communicate the benefits of female empowerment , contributing to overall societal well-being [e.g., 120 ].

Once women access education, the image they have of the world and their place in society (i.e., habitus) affects their education performance [ 13 ] and is passed on to their children. These situations reinforce gender stereotypes, which become self-fulfilling prophecies that may negatively affect female students’ performance by lowering their confidence and heightening their anxiety [ 121 , 122 ]. Besides formal education, also the information that women are exposed to on a daily basis contributes to their human capital . Digital inequalities, for instance, stems from men spending more time online and acquiring higher digital skills than women [ 123 ].

Education is also a factor that should boost employability of candidates and thus hiring , career progression and compensation , however the relationship between these factors is not straightforward [ 115 ]. First, educational choices ( decision-making ) are influenced by variables such as self-efficacy and the presence of barriers, irrespectively of the career opportunities they offer, especially in STEM [ 124 ]. This brings additional difficulties to women’s enrollment and persistence in scientific and technical fields of study due to stereotypes and biases [ 125 , 126 ]. Moreover, access to education does not automatically translate into job opportunities for women and minority groups [ 127 , 128 ] or into female access to managerial positions [ 129 ].

Finally, parenting is reported as an antecedent of education [e.g., 130 ], with much of the literature focusing on the role of parents’ education on the opportunities afforded to children to enroll in education [ 131 – 134 ] and the role of parenting in their offspring’s perception of study fields and attitudes towards learning [ 135 – 138 ]. Parental education is also a predictor of the other related topics, namely human capital and compensation [ 139 ].

Decision-making.

This literature mainly points to the fact that women are thought to make decisions differently than men. Women have indeed different priorities, such as they care more about people’s well-being, working with people or helping others, rather than maximizing their personal (or their firm’s) gain [ 140 ]. In other words, women typically present more communal than agentic behaviors, which are instead more frequent among men [ 141 ]. These different attitude, behavior and preferences in turn affect the decisions they make [e.g., 142 ] and the decision-making of the firm in which they work [e.g., 143 ].

At the individual level, gender affects, for instance, career aspirations [e.g., 144 ] and choices [e.g., 142 , 145 ], or the decision of creating a venture [e.g., 108 , 109 , 146 ]. Moreover, in everyday life, women and men make different decisions regarding partners [e.g., 147 ], childcare [e.g., 148 ], education [e.g., 149 ], attention to the environment [e.g., 150 ] and politics [e.g., 151 ].

At the firm level, scholars highlighted, for example, how the presence of women in the board affects corporate decisions [e.g., 152 , 153 ], that female CEOs are more conservative in accounting decisions [e.g., 154 ], or that female CFOs tend to make more conservative decisions regarding the firm’s financial reporting [e.g., 155 ]. Nevertheless, firm level research also investigated decisions that, influenced by gender bias, affect women, such as those pertaining hiring [e.g., 156 , 157 ], compensation [e.g., 73 , 158 ], or the empowerment of women once appointed [ 159 ].

Career progression.

Once women have entered the workforce, the key aspect to achieve gender equality becomes career progression , including efforts toward overcoming the glass ceiling. Indeed, according to the SBS analysis, career progression is highly related to words such as work, social issues and equality. The topic with which it has the highest semantic overlap is role , followed by decision-making , hiring , education , compensation , leadership , human capital , and family .

Career progression implies an advancement in the hierarchical ladder of the firm, assigning managerial roles to women. Coherently, much of the literature has focused on identifying rationales for a greater female participation in the top management team and board of directors [e.g., 95 ] as well as the best criteria to ensure that the decision-makers promote the most valuable employees irrespectively of their individual characteristics, such as gender [e.g., 84 ]. The link between career progression , role and compensation is often provided in practice by performance appraisal exercises, frequently rooted in a culture of meritocracy that guides bonuses, salary increases and promotions. However, performance appraisals can actually mask gender-biased decisions where women are held to higher standards than their male colleagues [e.g., 83 , 84 , 95 , 160 , 161 ]. Women often have less opportunities to gain leadership experience and are less visible than their male colleagues, which constitute barriers to career advancement [e.g., 162 ]. Therefore, transparency and accountability, together with procedures that discourage discretionary choices, are paramount to achieve a fair career progression [e.g., 84 ], together with the relaxation of strict job boundaries in favor of cross-functional and self-directed tasks [e.g., 163 ].

In addition, a series of stereotypes about the type of leadership characteristics that are required for top management positions, which fit better with typical male and agentic attributes, are another key barrier to career advancement for women [e.g., 92 , 160 ].

Hiring is the entrance gateway for women into the workforce. Therefore, it is related to other workforce topics such as compensation , role , career progression , decision-making , human capital , performance , organization and education .

A first stream of literature focuses on the process leading up to candidates’ job applications, demonstrating that bias exists before positions are even opened, and it is perpetuated both by men and women through networking and gatekeeping practices [e.g., 164 , 165 ].

The hiring process itself is also subject to biases [ 166 ], for example gender-congruity bias that leads to men being preferred candidates in male-dominated sectors [e.g., 167 ], women being hired in positions with higher risk of failure [e.g., 168 ] and limited transparency and accountability afforded by written processes and procedures [e.g., 164 ] that all contribute to ascriptive inequality. In addition, providing incentives for evaluators to hire women may actually work to this end; however, this is not the case when supporting female candidates endangers higher-ranking male ones [ 169 ].

Another interesting perspective, instead, looks at top management teams’ composition and the effects on hiring practices, indicating that firms with more women in top management are less likely to lay off staff [e.g., 152 ].

Performance.

Several scholars posed their attention towards women’s performance, its consequences [e.g., 170 , 171 ] and the implications of having women in decision-making positions [e.g., 18 , 19 ].

At the individual level, research focused on differences in educational and academic performance between women and men, especially referring to the gender gap in STEM fields [e.g., 171 ]. The presence of stereotype threats–that is the expectation that the members of a social group (e.g., women) “must deal with the possibility of being judged or treated stereotypically, or of doing something that would confirm the stereotype” [ 172 ]–affects women’s interested in STEM [e.g., 173 ], as well as their cognitive ability tests, penalizing them [e.g., 174 ]. A stronger gender identification enhances this gap [e.g., 175 ], whereas mentoring and role models can be used as solutions to this problem [e.g., 121 ]. Despite the negative effect of stereotype threats on girls’ performance [ 176 ], female and male students perform equally in mathematics and related subjects [e.g., 177 ]. Moreover, while individuals’ performance at school and university generally affects their achievements and the field in which they end up working, evidence reveals that performance in math or other scientific subjects does not explain why fewer women enter STEM working fields; rather this gap depends on other aspects, such as culture, past working experiences, or self-efficacy [e.g., 170 ]. Finally, scholars have highlighted the penalization that women face for their positive performance, for instance when they succeed in traditionally male areas [e.g., 178 ]. This penalization is explained by the violation of gender-stereotypic prescriptions [e.g., 179 , 180 ], that is having women well performing in agentic areas, which are typical associated to men. Performance penalization can thus be overcome by clearly conveying communal characteristics and behaviors [ 178 ].

Evidence has been provided on how the involvement of women in boards of directors and decision-making positions affects firms’ performance. Nevertheless, results are mixed, with some studies showing positive effects on financial [ 19 , 181 , 182 ] and corporate social performance [ 99 , 182 , 183 ]. Other studies maintain a negative association [e.g., 18 ], and other again mixed [e.g., 184 ] or non-significant association [e.g., 185 ]. Also with respect to the presence of a female CEO, mixed results emerged so far, with some researches demonstrating a positive effect on firm’s performance [e.g., 96 , 186 ], while other obtaining only a limited evidence of this relationship [e.g., 103 ] or a negative one [e.g., 187 ].

Finally, some studies have investigated whether and how women’s performance affects their hiring [e.g., 101 ] and career progression [e.g., 83 , 160 ]. For instance, academic performance leads to different returns in hiring for women and men. Specifically, high-achieving men are called back significantly more often than high-achieving women, which are penalized when they have a major in mathematics; this result depends on employers’ gendered standards for applicants [e.g., 101 ]. Once appointed, performance ratings are more strongly related to promotions for women than men, and promoted women typically show higher past performance ratings than those of promoted men. This suggesting that women are subject to stricter standards for promotion [e.g., 160 ].

Behavioral aspects related to gender follow two main streams of literature. The first examines female personality and behavior in the workplace, and their alignment with cultural expectations or stereotypes [e.g., 188 ] as well as their impacts on equality. There is a common bias that depicts women as less agentic than males. Certain characteristics, such as those more congruent with male behaviors–e.g., self-promotion [e.g., 189 ], negotiation skills [e.g., 190 ] and general agentic behavior [e.g., 191 ]–, are less accepted in women. However, characteristics such as individualism in women have been found to promote greater gender equality in society [ 192 ]. In addition, behaviors such as display of emotions [e.g., 193 ], which are stereotypically female, work against women’s acceptance in the workplace, requiring women to carefully moderate their behavior to avoid exclusion. A counter-intuitive result is that women and minorities, which are more marginalized in the workplace, tend to be better problem-solvers in innovation competitions due to their different knowledge bases [ 194 ].

The other side of the coin is examined in a parallel literature stream on behavior towards women in the workplace. As a result of biases, prejudices and stereotypes, women may experience adverse behavior from their colleagues, such as incivility and harassment, which undermine their well-being [e.g., 195 , 196 ]. Biases that go beyond gender, such as for overweight people, are also more strongly applied to women [ 197 ].

Organization.

The role of women and gender bias in organizations has been studied from different perspectives, which mirror those presented in detail in the following sections. Specifically, most research highlighted the stereotypical view of leaders [e.g., 105 ] and the roles played by women within firms, for instance referring to presence in the board of directors [e.g., 18 , 90 , 91 ], appointment as CEOs [e.g., 16 ], or top executives [e.g., 93 ].

Scholars have investigated antecedents and consequences of the presence of women in these apical roles. On the one side they looked at hiring and career progression [e.g., 83 , 92 , 160 , 168 , 198 ], finding women typically disadvantaged with respect to their male counterparts. On the other side, they studied women’s leadership styles and influence on the firm’s decision-making [e.g., 152 , 154 , 155 , 199 ], with implications for performance [e.g., 18 , 19 , 96 ].

Human capital.

Human capital is a transverse topic that touches upon many different aspects of female gender equality. As such, it has the most associations with other topics, starting with education as mentioned above, with career-related topics such as role , decision-making , hiring , career progression , performance , compensation , leadership and organization . Another topic with which there is a close connection is behavior . In general, human capital is approached both from the education standpoint but also from the perspective of social capital.

The behavioral aspect in human capital comprises research related to gender differences for example in cultural and religious beliefs that influence women’s attitudes and perceptions towards STEM subjects [ 142 , 200 – 202 ], towards employment [ 203 ] or towards environmental issues [ 150 , 204 ]. These cultural differences also emerge in the context of globalization which may accelerate gender equality in the workforce [ 205 , 206 ]. Gender differences also appear in behaviors such as motivation [ 207 ], and in negotiation [ 190 ], and have repercussions on women’s decision-making related to their careers. The so-called gender equality paradox sees women in countries with lower gender equality more likely to pursue studies and careers in STEM fields, whereas the gap in STEM enrollment widens as countries achieve greater equality in society [ 171 ].

Career progression is modeled by literature as a choice-process where personal preferences, culture and decision-making affect the chosen path and the outcomes. Some literature highlights how women tend to self-select into different professions than men, often due to stereotypes rather than actual ability to perform in these professions [ 142 , 144 ]. These stereotypes also affect the perceptions of female performance or the amount of human capital required to equal male performance [ 110 , 193 , 208 ], particularly for mothers [ 81 ]. It is therefore often assumed that women are better suited to less visible and less leadership -oriented roles [ 209 ]. Women also express differing preferences towards work-family balance, which affect whether and how they pursue human capital gains [ 210 ], and ultimately their career progression and salary .

On the other hand, men are often unaware of gendered processes and behaviors that they carry forward in their interactions and decision-making [ 211 , 212 ]. Therefore, initiatives aimed at increasing managers’ human capital –by raising awareness of gender disparities in their organizations and engaging them in diversity promotion–are essential steps to counter gender bias and segregation [ 213 ].

Emerging topics: Leadership and entrepreneurship

Among the emerging topics, the most pervasive one is women reaching leadership positions in the workforce and in society. This is still a rare occurrence for two main types of factors, on the one hand, bias and discrimination make it harder for women to access leadership positions [e.g., 214 – 216 ], on the other hand, the competitive nature and high pressure associated with leadership positions, coupled with the lack of women currently represented, reduce women’s desire to achieve them [e.g., 209 , 217 ]. Women are more effective leaders when they have access to education, resources and a diverse environment with representation [e.g., 218 , 219 ].

One sector where there is potential for women to carve out a leadership role is entrepreneurship . Although at the start of the millennium the discourse on entrepreneurship was found to be “discriminatory, gender-biased, ethnocentrically determined and ideologically controlled” [ 220 ], an increasing body of literature is studying how to stimulate female entrepreneurship as an alternative pathway to wealth, leadership and empowerment [e.g., 221 ]. Many barriers exist for women to access entrepreneurship, including the institutional and legal environment, social and cultural factors, access to knowledge and resources, and individual behavior [e.g., 222 , 223 ]. Education has been found to raise women’s entrepreneurial intentions [e.g., 224 ], although this effect is smaller than for men [e.g., 109 ]. In addition, increasing self-efficacy and risk-taking behavior constitute important success factors [e.g., 225 ].

Finally, the topic of sustainability is worth mentioning, as it is the primary objective of the SDGs and is closely associated with societal well-being. As society grapples with the effects of climate change and increasing depletion of natural resources, a narrative has emerged on women and their greater link to the environment [ 226 ]. Studies in developed countries have found some support for women leaders’ attention to sustainability issues in firms [e.g., 227 – 229 ], and smaller resource consumption by women [ 230 ]. At the same time, women will likely be more affected by the consequences of climate change [e.g., 230 ] but often lack the decision-making power to influence local decision-making on resource management and environmental policies [e.g., 231 ].

Research gaps and conclusions

Research on gender equality has advanced rapidly in the past decades, with a steady increase in publications, both in mainstream topics related to women in education and the workforce, and in emerging topics. Through a novel approach combining methods of text mining and social network analysis, we examined a comprehensive body of literature comprising 15,465 papers published between 2000 and mid 2021 on topics related to gender equality. We identified a set of 27 topics addressed by the literature and examined their connections.

At the highest level of abstraction, it is worth noting that papers abound on the identification of issues related to gender inequalities and imbalances in the workforce and in society. Literature has thoroughly examined the (unconscious) biases, barriers, stereotypes, and discriminatory behaviors that women are facing as a result of their gender. Instead, there are much fewer papers that discuss or demonstrate effective solutions to overcome gender bias [e.g., 121 , 143 , 145 , 163 , 194 , 213 , 232 ]. This is partly due to the relative ease in studying the status quo, as opposed to studying changes in the status quo. However, we observed a shift in the more recent years towards solution seeking in this domain, which we strongly encourage future researchers to focus on. In the future, we may focus on collecting and mapping pro-active contributions to gender studies, using additional Natural Language Processing techniques, able to measure the sentiment of scientific papers [ 43 ].

All of the mainstream topics identified in our literature review are closely related, and there is a wealth of insights looking at the intersection between issues such as education and career progression or human capital and role . However, emerging topics are worthy of being furtherly explored. It would be interesting to see more work on the topic of female entrepreneurship , exploring aspects such as education , personality , governance , management and leadership . For instance, how can education support female entrepreneurship? How can self-efficacy and risk-taking behaviors be taught or enhanced? What are the differences in managerial and governance styles of female entrepreneurs? Which personality traits are associated with successful entrepreneurs? Which traits are preferred by venture capitalists and funding bodies?

The emerging topic of sustainability also deserves further attention, as our society struggles with climate change and its consequences. It would be interesting to see more research on the intersection between sustainability and entrepreneurship , looking at how female entrepreneurs are tackling sustainability issues, examining both their business models and their company governance . In addition, scholars are suggested to dig deeper into the relationship between family values and behaviors.

Moreover, it would be relevant to understand how women’s networks (social capital), or the composition and structure of social networks involving both women and men, enable them to increase their remuneration and reach top corporate positions, participate in key decision-making bodies, and have a voice in communities. Furthermore, the achievement of gender equality might significantly change firm networks and ecosystems, with important implications for their performance and survival.

Similarly, research at the nexus of (corporate) governance , career progression , compensation and female empowerment could yield useful insights–for example discussing how enterprises, institutions and countries are managed and the impact for women and other minorities. Are there specific governance structures that favor diversity and inclusion?

Lastly, we foresee an emerging stream of research pertaining how the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic challenged women, especially in the workforce, by making gender biases more evident.

For our analysis, we considered a set of 15,465 articles downloaded from the Scopus database (which is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature). As we were interested in reviewing business and economics related gender studies, we only considered those papers published in journals listed in the Academic Journal Guide (AJG) 2018 ranking of the Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS). All the journals listed in this ranking are also indexed by Scopus. Therefore, looking at a single database (i.e., Scopus) should not be considered a limitation of our study. However, future research could consider different databases and inclusion criteria.

With our literature review, we offer researchers a comprehensive map of major gender-related research trends over the past twenty-two years. This can serve as a lens to look to the future, contributing to the achievement of SDG5. Researchers may use our study as a starting point to identify key themes addressed in the literature. In addition, our methodological approach–based on the use of the Semantic Brand Score and its webapp–could support scholars interested in reviewing other areas of research.

Supporting information

S1 text. keywords used for paper selection..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474.s001

Acknowledgments

The computing resources and the related technical support used for this work have been provided by CRESCO/ENEAGRID High Performance Computing infrastructure and its staff. CRESCO/ENEAGRID High Performance Computing infrastructure is funded by ENEA, the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development and by Italian and European research programmes (see http://www.cresco.enea.it/english for information).

• View Article
• PubMed/NCBI
• Google Scholar
• 9. UN. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. General Assembley 70 Session; 2015.
• 11. Nature. Get the Sustainable Development Goals back on track. Nature. 2020;577(January 2):7–8
• 37. Fronzetti Colladon A, Grippa F. Brand intelligence analytics. In: Przegalinska A, Grippa F, Gloor PA, editors. Digital Transformation of Collaboration. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2020. p. 125–41. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233276 pmid:32442196
• 39. Griffiths TL, Steyvers M, editors. Finding scientific topics. National academy of Sciences; 2004.
• 40. Mimno D, Wallach H, Talley E, Leenders M, McCallum A, editors. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2011.
• 41. Wang C, Blei DM, editors. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining 2011.
• 46. Straka M, Straková J, editors. Tokenizing, pos tagging, lemmatizing and parsing ud 2.0 with udpipe. CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies; 2017.
• 49. Lu Y, Li, R., Wen K, Lu Z, editors. Automatic keyword extraction for scientific literatures using references. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing (ICIDM); 2014.
• 55. Roelleke T, Wang J, editors. TF-IDF uncovered. 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval—SIGIR ‘08; 2008.
• 56. Mihalcea R, Tarau P, editors. TextRank: Bringing order into text. 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2004.
• 58. Iannone F, Ambrosino F, Bracco G, De Rosa M, Funel A, Guarnieri G, et al., editors. CRESCO ENEA HPC clusters: A working example of a multifabric GPFS Spectrum Scale layout. 2019 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS); 2019.
• 60. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
• 141. Williams JE, Best DL. Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study, Rev: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990.
• 172. Steele CM, Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the test performance of academically successful African Americans. In: Jencks C, Phillips M, editors. The Black–White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings; 1998. p. 401–27