Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
- What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
![](http://blog10.website/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
Published on June 19, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.
Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.
Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research , which involves collecting and analyzing numerical data for statistical analysis.
Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, history, etc.
- How does social media shape body image in teenagers?
- How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK?
- What factors influence employee retention in a large organization?
- How is anxiety experienced around the world?
- How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums?
Table of contents
Approaches to qualitative research, qualitative research methods, qualitative data analysis, advantages of qualitative research, disadvantages of qualitative research, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about qualitative research.
Qualitative research is used to understand how people experience the world. While there are many approaches to qualitative research, they tend to be flexible and focus on retaining rich meaning when interpreting data.
Common approaches include grounded theory, ethnography , action research , phenomenological research, and narrative research. They share some similarities, but emphasize different aims and perspectives.
Approach | What does it involve? |
---|---|
Grounded theory | Researchers collect rich data on a topic of interest and develop theories . |
Researchers immerse themselves in groups or organizations to understand their cultures. | |
Action research | Researchers and participants collaboratively link theory to practice to drive social change. |
Phenomenological research | Researchers investigate a phenomenon or event by describing and interpreting participants’ lived experiences. |
Narrative research | Researchers examine how stories are told to understand how participants perceive and make sense of their experiences. |
Note that qualitative research is at risk for certain research biases including the Hawthorne effect , observer bias , recall bias , and social desirability bias . While not always totally avoidable, awareness of potential biases as you collect and analyze your data can prevent them from impacting your work too much.
Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.
Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods . These are some of the most common qualitative methods:
- Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes.
- Interviews: personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations.
- Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among a group of people.
- Surveys : distributing questionnaires with open-ended questions.
- Secondary research: collecting existing data in the form of texts, images, audio or video recordings, etc.
- You take field notes with observations and reflect on your own experiences of the company culture.
- You distribute open-ended surveys to employees across all the company’s offices by email to find out if the culture varies across locations.
- You conduct in-depth interviews with employees in your office to learn about their experiences and perspectives in greater detail.
Qualitative researchers often consider themselves “instruments” in research because all observations, interpretations and analyses are filtered through their own personal lens.
For this reason, when writing up your methodology for qualitative research, it’s important to reflect on your approach and to thoroughly explain the choices you made in collecting and analyzing the data.
Qualitative data can take the form of texts, photos, videos and audio. For example, you might be working with interview transcripts, survey responses, fieldnotes, or recordings from natural settings.
Most types of qualitative data analysis share the same five steps:
- Prepare and organize your data. This may mean transcribing interviews or typing up fieldnotes.
- Review and explore your data. Examine the data for patterns or repeated ideas that emerge.
- Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of codes that you can apply to categorize your data.
- Assign codes to the data. For example, in qualitative survey analysis, this may mean going through each participant’s responses and tagging them with codes in a spreadsheet. As you go through your data, you can create new codes to add to your system if necessary.
- Identify recurring themes. Link codes together into cohesive, overarching themes.
There are several specific approaches to analyzing qualitative data. Although these methods share similar processes, they emphasize different concepts.
Approach | When to use | Example |
---|---|---|
To describe and categorize common words, phrases, and ideas in qualitative data. | A market researcher could perform content analysis to find out what kind of language is used in descriptions of therapeutic apps. | |
To identify and interpret patterns and themes in qualitative data. | A psychologist could apply thematic analysis to travel blogs to explore how tourism shapes self-identity. | |
To examine the content, structure, and design of texts. | A media researcher could use textual analysis to understand how news coverage of celebrities has changed in the past decade. | |
To study communication and how language is used to achieve effects in specific contexts. | A political scientist could use discourse analysis to study how politicians generate trust in election campaigns. |
Qualitative research often tries to preserve the voice and perspective of participants and can be adjusted as new research questions arise. Qualitative research is good for:
- Flexibility
The data collection and analysis process can be adapted as new ideas or patterns emerge. They are not rigidly decided beforehand.
- Natural settings
Data collection occurs in real-world contexts or in naturalistic ways.
- Meaningful insights
Detailed descriptions of people’s experiences, feelings and perceptions can be used in designing, testing or improving systems or products.
- Generation of new ideas
Open-ended responses mean that researchers can uncover novel problems or opportunities that they wouldn’t have thought of otherwise.
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
Researchers must consider practical and theoretical limitations in analyzing and interpreting their data. Qualitative research suffers from:
- Unreliability
The real-world setting often makes qualitative research unreliable because of uncontrolled factors that affect the data.
- Subjectivity
Due to the researcher’s primary role in analyzing and interpreting data, qualitative research cannot be replicated . The researcher decides what is important and what is irrelevant in data analysis, so interpretations of the same data can vary greatly.
- Limited generalizability
Small samples are often used to gather detailed data about specific contexts. Despite rigorous analysis procedures, it is difficult to draw generalizable conclusions because the data may be biased and unrepresentative of the wider population .
- Labor-intensive
Although software can be used to manage and record large amounts of text, data analysis often has to be checked or performed manually.
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Chi square goodness of fit test
- Degrees of freedom
- Null hypothesis
- Discourse analysis
- Control groups
- Mixed methods research
- Non-probability sampling
- Quantitative research
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Research bias
- Rosenthal effect
- Implicit bias
- Cognitive bias
- Selection bias
- Negativity bias
- Status quo bias
Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.
Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.
There are five common approaches to qualitative research :
- Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories.
- Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organization to understand its culture.
- Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions.
- Phenomenological research involves investigating phenomena through people’s lived experiences.
- Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes.
Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.
There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:
- Prepare and organize your data.
- Review and explore your data.
- Develop a data coding system.
- Assign codes to the data.
- Identify recurring themes.
The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 30, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/
Is this article helpful?
![what is qualitative type of research Pritha Bhandari](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/pritha-author-pic.jpg)
Pritha Bhandari
Other students also liked, qualitative vs. quantitative research | differences, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, what is your plagiarism score.
- Privacy Policy
![what is qualitative type of research Research Method](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/logo.png)
Home » Qualitative Research – Methods, Analysis Types and Guide
Qualitative Research – Methods, Analysis Types and Guide
Table of Contents
![what is qualitative type of research Qualitative Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Qualitative_Research-1024x576.jpg)
Qualitative Research
Qualitative research is a type of research methodology that focuses on exploring and understanding people’s beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences through the collection and analysis of non-numerical data. It seeks to answer research questions through the examination of subjective data, such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and textual analysis.
Qualitative research aims to uncover the meaning and significance of social phenomena, and it typically involves a more flexible and iterative approach to data collection and analysis compared to quantitative research. Qualitative research is often used in fields such as sociology, anthropology, psychology, and education.
Qualitative Research Methods
![what is qualitative type of research Types of Qualitative Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Types_of_Qualitative_Research-1024x576.jpg)
Qualitative Research Methods are as follows:
One-to-One Interview
This method involves conducting an interview with a single participant to gain a detailed understanding of their experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. One-to-one interviews can be conducted in-person, over the phone, or through video conferencing. The interviewer typically uses open-ended questions to encourage the participant to share their thoughts and feelings. One-to-one interviews are useful for gaining detailed insights into individual experiences.
Focus Groups
This method involves bringing together a group of people to discuss a specific topic in a structured setting. The focus group is led by a moderator who guides the discussion and encourages participants to share their thoughts and opinions. Focus groups are useful for generating ideas and insights, exploring social norms and attitudes, and understanding group dynamics.
Ethnographic Studies
This method involves immersing oneself in a culture or community to gain a deep understanding of its norms, beliefs, and practices. Ethnographic studies typically involve long-term fieldwork and observation, as well as interviews and document analysis. Ethnographic studies are useful for understanding the cultural context of social phenomena and for gaining a holistic understanding of complex social processes.
Text Analysis
This method involves analyzing written or spoken language to identify patterns and themes. Text analysis can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative text analysis involves close reading and interpretation of texts to identify recurring themes, concepts, and patterns. Text analysis is useful for understanding media messages, public discourse, and cultural trends.
This method involves an in-depth examination of a single person, group, or event to gain an understanding of complex phenomena. Case studies typically involve a combination of data collection methods, such as interviews, observations, and document analysis, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case. Case studies are useful for exploring unique or rare cases, and for generating hypotheses for further research.
Process of Observation
This method involves systematically observing and recording behaviors and interactions in natural settings. The observer may take notes, use audio or video recordings, or use other methods to document what they see. Process of observation is useful for understanding social interactions, cultural practices, and the context in which behaviors occur.
Record Keeping
This method involves keeping detailed records of observations, interviews, and other data collected during the research process. Record keeping is essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data, and for providing a basis for analysis and interpretation.
This method involves collecting data from a large sample of participants through a structured questionnaire. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, through mail, or online. Surveys are useful for collecting data on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, and for identifying patterns and trends in a population.
Qualitative data analysis is a process of turning unstructured data into meaningful insights. It involves extracting and organizing information from sources like interviews, focus groups, and surveys. The goal is to understand people’s attitudes, behaviors, and motivations
Qualitative Research Analysis Methods
Qualitative Research analysis methods involve a systematic approach to interpreting and making sense of the data collected in qualitative research. Here are some common qualitative data analysis methods:
Thematic Analysis
This method involves identifying patterns or themes in the data that are relevant to the research question. The researcher reviews the data, identifies keywords or phrases, and groups them into categories or themes. Thematic analysis is useful for identifying patterns across multiple data sources and for generating new insights into the research topic.
Content Analysis
This method involves analyzing the content of written or spoken language to identify key themes or concepts. Content analysis can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative content analysis involves close reading and interpretation of texts to identify recurring themes, concepts, and patterns. Content analysis is useful for identifying patterns in media messages, public discourse, and cultural trends.
Discourse Analysis
This method involves analyzing language to understand how it constructs meaning and shapes social interactions. Discourse analysis can involve a variety of methods, such as conversation analysis, critical discourse analysis, and narrative analysis. Discourse analysis is useful for understanding how language shapes social interactions, cultural norms, and power relationships.
Grounded Theory Analysis
This method involves developing a theory or explanation based on the data collected. Grounded theory analysis starts with the data and uses an iterative process of coding and analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data. The theory or explanation that emerges is grounded in the data, rather than preconceived hypotheses. Grounded theory analysis is useful for understanding complex social phenomena and for generating new theoretical insights.
Narrative Analysis
This method involves analyzing the stories or narratives that participants share to gain insights into their experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. Narrative analysis can involve a variety of methods, such as structural analysis, thematic analysis, and discourse analysis. Narrative analysis is useful for understanding how individuals construct their identities, make sense of their experiences, and communicate their values and beliefs.
Phenomenological Analysis
This method involves analyzing how individuals make sense of their experiences and the meanings they attach to them. Phenomenological analysis typically involves in-depth interviews with participants to explore their experiences in detail. Phenomenological analysis is useful for understanding subjective experiences and for developing a rich understanding of human consciousness.
Comparative Analysis
This method involves comparing and contrasting data across different cases or groups to identify similarities and differences. Comparative analysis can be used to identify patterns or themes that are common across multiple cases, as well as to identify unique or distinctive features of individual cases. Comparative analysis is useful for understanding how social phenomena vary across different contexts and groups.
Applications of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research has many applications across different fields and industries. Here are some examples of how qualitative research is used:
- Market Research: Qualitative research is often used in market research to understand consumer attitudes, behaviors, and preferences. Researchers conduct focus groups and one-on-one interviews with consumers to gather insights into their experiences and perceptions of products and services.
- Health Care: Qualitative research is used in health care to explore patient experiences and perspectives on health and illness. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with patients and their families to gather information on their experiences with different health care providers and treatments.
- Education: Qualitative research is used in education to understand student experiences and to develop effective teaching strategies. Researchers conduct classroom observations and interviews with students and teachers to gather insights into classroom dynamics and instructional practices.
- Social Work : Qualitative research is used in social work to explore social problems and to develop interventions to address them. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with individuals and families to understand their experiences with poverty, discrimination, and other social problems.
- Anthropology : Qualitative research is used in anthropology to understand different cultures and societies. Researchers conduct ethnographic studies and observe and interview members of different cultural groups to gain insights into their beliefs, practices, and social structures.
- Psychology : Qualitative research is used in psychology to understand human behavior and mental processes. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
- Public Policy : Qualitative research is used in public policy to explore public attitudes and to inform policy decisions. Researchers conduct focus groups and one-on-one interviews with members of the public to gather insights into their perspectives on different policy issues.
How to Conduct Qualitative Research
Here are some general steps for conducting qualitative research:
- Identify your research question: Qualitative research starts with a research question or set of questions that you want to explore. This question should be focused and specific, but also broad enough to allow for exploration and discovery.
- Select your research design: There are different types of qualitative research designs, including ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and phenomenology. You should select a design that aligns with your research question and that will allow you to gather the data you need to answer your research question.
- Recruit participants: Once you have your research question and design, you need to recruit participants. The number of participants you need will depend on your research design and the scope of your research. You can recruit participants through advertisements, social media, or through personal networks.
- Collect data: There are different methods for collecting qualitative data, including interviews, focus groups, observation, and document analysis. You should select the method or methods that align with your research design and that will allow you to gather the data you need to answer your research question.
- Analyze data: Once you have collected your data, you need to analyze it. This involves reviewing your data, identifying patterns and themes, and developing codes to organize your data. You can use different software programs to help you analyze your data, or you can do it manually.
- Interpret data: Once you have analyzed your data, you need to interpret it. This involves making sense of the patterns and themes you have identified, and developing insights and conclusions that answer your research question. You should be guided by your research question and use your data to support your conclusions.
- Communicate results: Once you have interpreted your data, you need to communicate your results. This can be done through academic papers, presentations, or reports. You should be clear and concise in your communication, and use examples and quotes from your data to support your findings.
Examples of Qualitative Research
Here are some real-time examples of qualitative research:
- Customer Feedback: A company may conduct qualitative research to understand the feedback and experiences of its customers. This may involve conducting focus groups or one-on-one interviews with customers to gather insights into their attitudes, behaviors, and preferences.
- Healthcare : A healthcare provider may conduct qualitative research to explore patient experiences and perspectives on health and illness. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with patients and their families to gather information on their experiences with different health care providers and treatments.
- Education : An educational institution may conduct qualitative research to understand student experiences and to develop effective teaching strategies. This may involve conducting classroom observations and interviews with students and teachers to gather insights into classroom dynamics and instructional practices.
- Social Work: A social worker may conduct qualitative research to explore social problems and to develop interventions to address them. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with individuals and families to understand their experiences with poverty, discrimination, and other social problems.
- Anthropology : An anthropologist may conduct qualitative research to understand different cultures and societies. This may involve conducting ethnographic studies and observing and interviewing members of different cultural groups to gain insights into their beliefs, practices, and social structures.
- Psychology : A psychologist may conduct qualitative research to understand human behavior and mental processes. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
- Public Policy: A government agency or non-profit organization may conduct qualitative research to explore public attitudes and to inform policy decisions. This may involve conducting focus groups and one-on-one interviews with members of the public to gather insights into their perspectives on different policy issues.
Purpose of Qualitative Research
The purpose of qualitative research is to explore and understand the subjective experiences, behaviors, and perspectives of individuals or groups in a particular context. Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, qualitative research aims to provide in-depth, descriptive information that can help researchers develop insights and theories about complex social phenomena.
Qualitative research can serve multiple purposes, including:
- Exploring new or emerging phenomena : Qualitative research can be useful for exploring new or emerging phenomena, such as new technologies or social trends. This type of research can help researchers develop a deeper understanding of these phenomena and identify potential areas for further study.
- Understanding complex social phenomena : Qualitative research can be useful for exploring complex social phenomena, such as cultural beliefs, social norms, or political processes. This type of research can help researchers develop a more nuanced understanding of these phenomena and identify factors that may influence them.
- Generating new theories or hypotheses: Qualitative research can be useful for generating new theories or hypotheses about social phenomena. By gathering rich, detailed data about individuals’ experiences and perspectives, researchers can develop insights that may challenge existing theories or lead to new lines of inquiry.
- Providing context for quantitative data: Qualitative research can be useful for providing context for quantitative data. By gathering qualitative data alongside quantitative data, researchers can develop a more complete understanding of complex social phenomena and identify potential explanations for quantitative findings.
When to use Qualitative Research
Here are some situations where qualitative research may be appropriate:
- Exploring a new area: If little is known about a particular topic, qualitative research can help to identify key issues, generate hypotheses, and develop new theories.
- Understanding complex phenomena: Qualitative research can be used to investigate complex social, cultural, or organizational phenomena that are difficult to measure quantitatively.
- Investigating subjective experiences: Qualitative research is particularly useful for investigating the subjective experiences of individuals or groups, such as their attitudes, beliefs, values, or emotions.
- Conducting formative research: Qualitative research can be used in the early stages of a research project to develop research questions, identify potential research participants, and refine research methods.
- Evaluating interventions or programs: Qualitative research can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or programs by collecting data on participants’ experiences, attitudes, and behaviors.
Characteristics of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research is characterized by several key features, including:
- Focus on subjective experience: Qualitative research is concerned with understanding the subjective experiences, beliefs, and perspectives of individuals or groups in a particular context. Researchers aim to explore the meanings that people attach to their experiences and to understand the social and cultural factors that shape these meanings.
- Use of open-ended questions: Qualitative research relies on open-ended questions that allow participants to provide detailed, in-depth responses. Researchers seek to elicit rich, descriptive data that can provide insights into participants’ experiences and perspectives.
- Sampling-based on purpose and diversity: Qualitative research often involves purposive sampling, in which participants are selected based on specific criteria related to the research question. Researchers may also seek to include participants with diverse experiences and perspectives to capture a range of viewpoints.
- Data collection through multiple methods: Qualitative research typically involves the use of multiple data collection methods, such as in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observation. This allows researchers to gather rich, detailed data from multiple sources, which can provide a more complete picture of participants’ experiences and perspectives.
- Inductive data analysis: Qualitative research relies on inductive data analysis, in which researchers develop theories and insights based on the data rather than testing pre-existing hypotheses. Researchers use coding and thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data and to develop theories and explanations based on these patterns.
- Emphasis on researcher reflexivity: Qualitative research recognizes the importance of the researcher’s role in shaping the research process and outcomes. Researchers are encouraged to reflect on their own biases and assumptions and to be transparent about their role in the research process.
Advantages of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research offers several advantages over other research methods, including:
- Depth and detail: Qualitative research allows researchers to gather rich, detailed data that provides a deeper understanding of complex social phenomena. Through in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observation, researchers can gather detailed information about participants’ experiences and perspectives that may be missed by other research methods.
- Flexibility : Qualitative research is a flexible approach that allows researchers to adapt their methods to the research question and context. Researchers can adjust their research methods in real-time to gather more information or explore unexpected findings.
- Contextual understanding: Qualitative research is well-suited to exploring the social and cultural context in which individuals or groups are situated. Researchers can gather information about cultural norms, social structures, and historical events that may influence participants’ experiences and perspectives.
- Participant perspective : Qualitative research prioritizes the perspective of participants, allowing researchers to explore subjective experiences and understand the meanings that participants attach to their experiences.
- Theory development: Qualitative research can contribute to the development of new theories and insights about complex social phenomena. By gathering rich, detailed data and using inductive data analysis, researchers can develop new theories and explanations that may challenge existing understandings.
- Validity : Qualitative research can offer high validity by using multiple data collection methods, purposive and diverse sampling, and researcher reflexivity. This can help ensure that findings are credible and trustworthy.
Limitations of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research also has some limitations, including:
- Subjectivity : Qualitative research relies on the subjective interpretation of researchers, which can introduce bias into the research process. The researcher’s perspective, beliefs, and experiences can influence the way data is collected, analyzed, and interpreted.
- Limited generalizability: Qualitative research typically involves small, purposive samples that may not be representative of larger populations. This limits the generalizability of findings to other contexts or populations.
- Time-consuming: Qualitative research can be a time-consuming process, requiring significant resources for data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
- Resource-intensive: Qualitative research may require more resources than other research methods, including specialized training for researchers, specialized software for data analysis, and transcription services.
- Limited reliability: Qualitative research may be less reliable than quantitative research, as it relies on the subjective interpretation of researchers. This can make it difficult to replicate findings or compare results across different studies.
- Ethics and confidentiality: Qualitative research involves collecting sensitive information from participants, which raises ethical concerns about confidentiality and informed consent. Researchers must take care to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants and obtain informed consent.
Also see Research Methods
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
![what is qualitative type of research Quantitative Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Quantitative_Research-1-145x100.png)
Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and...
![what is qualitative type of research Basic Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Basic_Research-145x100.png)
Basic Research – Types, Methods and Examples
![what is qualitative type of research Exploratory Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Exploratory_Research-145x100.png)
Exploratory Research – Types, Methods and...
![what is qualitative type of research Case Study Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Case_Study_Research-145x100.png)
Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide
![what is qualitative type of research Phenomenology](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Phenomenology-145x100.png)
Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide
![what is qualitative type of research Descriptive Research Design](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Descriptive_Research_Design-145x100.png)
Descriptive Research Design – Types, Methods and...
Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey
![what is qualitative type of research What is qualitative research? Methods, types, approaches, and examples](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/MicrosoftTeams-image-6.jpg)
What is Qualitative Research? Methods, Types, Approaches and Examples
Qualitative research is a type of method that researchers use depending on their study requirements. Research can be conducted using several methods, but before starting the process, researchers should understand the different methods available to decide the best one for their study type. The type of research method needed depends on a few important criteria, such as the research question, study type, time, costs, data availability, and availability of respondents. The two main types of methods are qualitative research and quantitative research. Sometimes, researchers may find it difficult to decide which type of method is most suitable for their study. Keeping in mind a simple rule of thumb could help you make the correct decision. Quantitative research should be used to validate or test a theory or hypothesis and qualitative research should be used to understand a subject or event or identify reasons for observed patterns.
Qualitative research methods are based on principles of social sciences from several disciplines like psychology, sociology, and anthropology. In this method, researchers try to understand the feelings and motivation of their respondents, which would have prompted them to select or give a particular response to a question. Here are two qualitative research examples :
- Two brands (A & B) of the same medicine are available at a pharmacy. However, Brand A is more popular and has higher sales. In qualitative research , the interviewers would ideally visit a few stores in different areas and ask customers their reason for selecting either brand. Respondents may have different reasons that motivate them to select one brand over the other, such as brand loyalty, cost, feedback from friends, doctor’s suggestion, etc. Once the reasons are known, companies could then address challenges in that specific area to increase their product’s sales.
- A company organizes a focus group meeting with a random sample of its product’s consumers to understand their opinion on a new product being launched.
![what is qualitative type of research](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AAP-Banner-3-1024x410.png)
Table of Contents
What is qualitative research? 1
Qualitative research is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data. The findings of qualitative research are expressed in words and help in understanding individuals’ subjective perceptions about an event, condition, or subject. This type of research is exploratory and is used to generate hypotheses or theories from data. Qualitative data are usually in the form of text, videos, photographs, and audio recordings. There are multiple qualitative research types , which will be discussed later.
Qualitative research methods 2
Researchers can choose from several qualitative research methods depending on the study type, research question, the researcher’s role, data to be collected, etc.
The following table lists the common qualitative research approaches with their purpose and examples, although there may be an overlap between some.
Narrative | Explore the experiences of individuals and tell a story to give insight into human lives and behaviors. Narratives can be obtained from journals, letters, conversations, autobiographies, interviews, etc. | A researcher collecting information to create a biography using old documents, interviews, etc. |
Phenomenology | Explain life experiences or phenomena, focusing on people’s subjective experiences and interpretations of the world. | Researchers exploring the experiences of family members of an individual undergoing a major surgery. |
Grounded theory | Investigate process, actions, and interactions, and based on this grounded or empirical data a theory is developed. Unlike experimental research, this method doesn’t require a hypothesis theory to begin with. | A company with a high attrition rate and no prior data may use this method to understand the reasons for which employees leave. |
Ethnography | Describe an ethnic, cultural, or social group by observation in their naturally occurring environment. | A researcher studying medical personnel in the immediate care division of a hospital to understand the culture and staff behaviors during high capacity. |
Case study | In-depth analysis of complex issues in real-life settings, mostly used in business, law, and policymaking. Learnings from case studies can be implemented in other similar contexts. | A case study about how a particular company turned around its product sales and the marketing strategies they used could help implement similar methods in other companies. |
Types of qualitative research 3,4
The data collection methods in qualitative research are designed to assess and understand the perceptions, motivations, and feelings of the respondents about the subject being studied. The different qualitative research types include the following:
- In-depth or one-on-one interviews : This is one of the most common qualitative research methods and helps the interviewers understand a respondent’s subjective opinion and experience pertaining to a specific topic or event. These interviews are usually conversational and encourage the respondents to express their opinions freely. Semi-structured interviews, which have open-ended questions (where the respondents can answer more than just “yes” or “no”), are commonly used. Such interviews can be either face-to-face or telephonic, and the duration can vary depending on the subject or the interviewer. Asking the right questions is essential in this method so that the interview can be led in the suitable direction. Face-to-face interviews also help interviewers observe the respondents’ body language, which could help in confirming whether the responses match.
- Document study/Literature review/Record keeping : Researchers’ review of already existing written materials such as archives, annual reports, research articles, guidelines, policy documents, etc.
- Focus groups : Usually include a small sample of about 6-10 people and a moderator, to understand the participants’ opinion on a given topic. Focus groups ensure constructive discussions to understand the why, what, and, how about the topic. These group meetings need not always be in-person. In recent times, online meetings are also encouraged, and online surveys could also be administered with the option to “write” subjective answers as well. However, this method is expensive and is mostly used for new products and ideas.
- Qualitative observation : In this method, researchers collect data using their five senses—sight, smell, touch, taste, and hearing. This method doesn’t include any measurements but only the subjective observation. For example, “The dessert served at the bakery was creamy with sweet buttercream frosting”; this observation is based on the taste perception.
![what is qualitative type of research](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/03_RDiscovery_BlogBanner_640x139px-1.png)
Qualitative research : Data collection and analysis
- Qualitative data collection is the process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research.
- The data collected are usually non-numeric and subjective and could be recorded in various methods, for instance, in case of one-to-one interviews, the responses may be recorded using handwritten notes, and audio and video recordings, depending on the interviewer and the setting or duration.
- Once the data are collected, they should be transcribed into meaningful or useful interpretations. An experienced researcher could take about 8-10 hours to transcribe an interview’s recordings. All such notes and recordings should be maintained properly for later reference.
- Some interviewers make use of “field notes.” These are not exactly the respondents’ answers but rather some observations the interviewer may have made while asking questions and may include non-verbal cues or any information about the setting or the environment. These notes are usually informal and help verify respondents’ answers.
2. Qualitative data analysis
- This process involves analyzing all the data obtained from the qualitative research methods in the form of text (notes), audio-video recordings, and pictures.
- Text analysis is a common form of qualitative data analysis in which researchers examine the social lives of the participants and analyze their words, actions, etc. in specific contexts. Social media platforms are now playing an important role in this method with researchers analyzing all information shared online.
There are usually five steps in the qualitative data analysis process: 5
- Prepare and organize the data
- Transcribe interviews
- Collect and document field notes and other material
- Review and explore the data
- Examine the data for patterns or important observations
- Develop a data coding system
- Create codes to categorize and connect the data
- Assign these codes to the data or responses
- Review the codes
- Identify recurring themes, opinions, patterns, etc.
- Present the findings
- Use the best possible method to present your observations
The following table 6 lists some common qualitative data analysis methods used by companies to make important decisions, with examples and when to use each. The methods may be similar and can overlap.
Content analysis | To identify patterns in text, by grouping content into words, concepts, and themes; that is, determine presence of certain words or themes in some text | Researchers examining the language used in a journal article to search for bias |
Narrative analysis | To understand people’s perspectives on specific issues. Focuses on people’s stories and the language used to tell these stories | A researcher conducting one or several in-depth interviews with an individual over a long period |
Discourse analysis | To understand political, cultural, and power dynamics in specific contexts; that is, how people express themselves in different social contexts | A researcher studying a politician’s speeches across multiple contexts, such as audience, region, political history, etc. |
Thematic analysis | To interpret the meaning behind the words used by people. This is done by identifying repetitive patterns or themes by reading through a dataset | Researcher analyzing raw data to explore the impact of high-stakes examinations on students and parents |
Characteristics of qualitative research methods 4
- Unstructured raw data : Qualitative research methods use unstructured, non-numerical data , which are analyzed to generate subjective conclusions about specific subjects, usually presented descriptively, instead of using statistical data.
- Site-specific data collection : In qualitative research methods , data are collected at specific areas where the respondents or researchers are either facing a challenge or have a need to explore. The process is conducted in a real-world setting and participants do not need to leave their original geographical setting to be able to participate.
- Researchers’ importance : Researchers play an instrumental role because, in qualitative research , communication with respondents is an essential part of data collection and analysis. In addition, researchers need to rely on their own observation and listening skills during an interaction and use and interpret that data appropriately.
- Multiple methods : Researchers collect data through various methods, as listed earlier, instead of relying on a single source. Although there may be some overlap between the qualitative research methods , each method has its own significance.
- Solving complex issues : These methods help in breaking down complex problems into more useful and interpretable inferences, which can be easily understood by everyone.
- Unbiased responses : Qualitative research methods rely on open communication where the participants are allowed to freely express their views. In such cases, the participants trust the interviewer, resulting in unbiased and truthful responses.
- Flexible : The qualitative research method can be changed at any stage of the research. The data analysis is not confined to being done at the end of the research but can be done in tandem with data collection. Consequently, based on preliminary analysis and new ideas, researchers have the liberty to change the method to suit their objective.
![what is qualitative type of research](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/RPaperpal_BlogBanners-1_03_.png)
When to use qualitative research 4
The following points will give you an idea about when to use qualitative research .
- When the objective of a research study is to understand behaviors and patterns of respondents, then qualitative research is the most suitable method because it gives a clear insight into the reasons for the occurrence of an event.
- A few use cases for qualitative research methods include:
- New product development or idea generation
- Strengthening a product’s marketing strategy
- Conducting a SWOT analysis of product or services portfolios to help take important strategic decisions
- Understanding purchasing behavior of consumers
- Understanding reactions of target market to ad campaigns
- Understanding market demographics and conducting competitor analysis
- Understanding the effectiveness of a new treatment method in a particular section of society
A qualitative research method case study to understand when to use qualitative research 7
Context : A high school in the US underwent a turnaround or conservatorship process and consequently experienced a below average teacher retention rate. Researchers conducted qualitative research to understand teachers’ experiences and perceptions of how the turnaround may have influenced the teachers’ morale and how this, in turn, would have affected teachers’ retention.
Method : Purposive sampling was used to select eight teachers who were employed with the school before the conservatorship process and who were subsequently retained. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with these teachers. The questions addressed teachers’ perspectives of morale and their views on the conservatorship process.
Results : The study generated six factors that may have been influencing teachers’ perspectives: powerlessness, excessive visitations, loss of confidence, ineffective instructional practices, stress and burnout, and ineffective professional development opportunities. Based on these factors, four recommendations were made to increase teacher retention by boosting their morale.
![what is qualitative type of research](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Picture1.png)
Advantages of qualitative research 1
- Reflects real-world settings , and therefore allows for ambiguities in data, as well as the flexibility to change the method based on new developments.
- Helps in understanding the feelings or beliefs of the respondents rather than relying only on quantitative data.
- Uses a descriptive and narrative style of presentation, which may be easier to understand for people from all backgrounds.
- Some topics involving sensitive or controversial content could be difficult to quantify and so qualitative research helps in analyzing such content.
- The availability of multiple data sources and research methods helps give a holistic picture.
- There’s more involvement of participants, which gives them an assurance that their opinion matters, possibly leading to unbiased responses.
Disadvantages of qualitative research 1
- Large-scale data sets cannot be included because of time and cost constraints.
- Ensuring validity and reliability may be a challenge because of the subjective nature of the data, so drawing definite conclusions could be difficult.
- Replication by other researchers may be difficult for the same contexts or situations.
- Generalization to a wider context or to other populations or settings is not possible.
- Data collection and analysis may be time consuming.
- Researcher’s interpretation may alter the results causing an unintended bias.
Differences between qualitative research and quantitative research 1
Purpose and design | Explore ideas, formulate hypotheses; more subjective | Test theories and hypotheses, discover causal relationships; measurable and more structured |
Data collection method | Semi-structured interviews/surveys with open-ended questions, document study/literature reviews, focus groups, case study research, ethnography | Experiments, controlled observations, questionnaires and surveys with a rating scale or closed-ended questions. The methods can be experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive, or correlational. |
Data analysis | Content analysis (determine presence of certain words/concepts in texts), grounded theory (hypothesis creation by data collection and analysis), thematic analysis (identify important themes/patterns in data and use these to address an issue) | Statistical analysis using applications such as Excel, SPSS, R |
Sample size | Small | Large |
Example | A company organizing focus groups or one-to-one interviews to understand customers’ (subjective) opinions about a specific product, based on which the company can modify their marketing strategy | Customer satisfaction surveys sent out by companies. Customers are asked to rate their experience on a rating scale of 1 to 5 |
Frequently asked questions on qualitative research
Q: how do i know if qualitative research is appropriate for my study .
A: Here’s a simple checklist you could use:
- Not much is known about the subject being studied.
- There is a need to understand or simplify a complex problem or situation.
- Participants’ experiences/beliefs/feelings are required for analysis.
- There’s no existing hypothesis to begin with, rather a theory would need to be created after analysis.
- You need to gather in-depth understanding of an event or subject, which may not need to be supported by numeric data.
Q: How do I ensure the reliability and validity of my qualitative research findings?
A: To ensure the validity of your qualitative research findings you should explicitly state your objective and describe clearly why you have interpreted the data in a particular way. Another method could be to connect your data in different ways or from different perspectives to see if you reach a similar, unbiased conclusion.
To ensure reliability, always create an audit trail of your qualitative research by describing your steps and reasons for every interpretation, so that if required, another researcher could trace your steps to corroborate your (or their own) findings. In addition, always look for patterns or consistencies in the data collected through different methods.
Q: Are there any sampling strategies or techniques for qualitative research ?
A: Yes, the following are few common sampling strategies used in qualitative research :
1. Convenience sampling
Selects participants who are most easily accessible to researchers due to geographical proximity, availability at a particular time, etc.
2. Purposive sampling
Participants are grouped according to predefined criteria based on a specific research question. Sample sizes are often determined based on theoretical saturation (when new data no longer provide additional insights).
3. Snowball sampling
Already selected participants use their social networks to refer the researcher to other potential participants.
4. Quota sampling
While designing the study, the researchers decide how many people with which characteristics to include as participants. The characteristics help in choosing people most likely to provide insights into the subject.
![what is qualitative type of research](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AAP-Banner-1-1024x410.png)
Q: What ethical standards need to be followed with qualitative research ?
A: The following ethical standards should be considered in qualitative research:
- Anonymity : The participants should never be identified in the study and researchers should ensure that no identifying information is mentioned even indirectly.
- Confidentiality : To protect participants’ confidentiality, ensure that all related documents, transcripts, notes are stored safely.
- Informed consent : Researchers should clearly communicate the objective of the study and how the participants’ responses will be used prior to engaging with the participants.
Q: How do I address bias in my qualitative research ?
A: You could use the following points to ensure an unbiased approach to your qualitative research :
- Check your interpretations of the findings with others’ interpretations to identify consistencies.
- If possible, you could ask your participants if your interpretations convey their beliefs to a significant extent.
- Data triangulation is a way of using multiple data sources to see if all methods consistently support your interpretations.
- Contemplate other possible explanations for your findings or interpretations and try ruling them out if possible.
- Conduct a peer review of your findings to identify any gaps that may not have been visible to you.
- Frame context-appropriate questions to ensure there is no researcher or participant bias.
We hope this article has given you answers to the question “ what is qualitative research ” and given you an in-depth understanding of the various aspects of qualitative research , including the definition, types, and approaches, when to use this method, and advantages and disadvantages, so that the next time you undertake a study you would know which type of research design to adopt.
References:
- McLeod, S. A. Qualitative vs. quantitative research. Simply Psychology [Accessed January 17, 2023]. www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html
- Omniconvert website [Accessed January 18, 2023]. https://www.omniconvert.com/blog/qualitative-research-definition-methodology-limitation-examples/
- Busetto L., Wick W., Gumbinger C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice [Accessed January 19, 2023] https://neurolrespract.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42466-020-00059
- QuestionPro website. Qualitative research methods: Types & examples [Accessed January 16, 2023]. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/qualitative-research-methods/
- Campuslabs website. How to analyze qualitative data [Accessed January 18, 2023]. https://baselinesupport.campuslabs.com/hc/en-us/articles/204305675-How-to-analyze-qualitative-data
- Thematic website. Qualitative data analysis: Step-by-guide [Accessed January 20, 2023]. https://getthematic.com/insights/qualitative-data-analysis/
- Lane L. J., Jones D., Penny G. R. Qualitative case study of teachers’ morale in a turnaround school. Research in Higher Education Journal . https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1233111.pdf
- Meetingsnet website. 7 FAQs about qualitative research and CME [Accessed January 21, 2023]. https://www.meetingsnet.com/cme-design/7-faqs-about-qualitative-research-and-cme
- Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Khoury College of Computer Sciences. Northeastern University. https://course.ccs.neu.edu/is4800sp12/resources/qualmethods.pdf
Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.
Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place – Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !
Related Posts
![what is qualitative type of research Back to school 2024 sale](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/beautiful-cheerful-female-student-smiling-greeting-holding-folders-outdoors-1-800x600.jpg)
Back to School – Lock-in All Access Pack for a Year at the Best Price
![what is qualitative type of research journal turnaround time](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/excited-diverse-people-watching-laptop-1-800x600.jpg)
Journal Turnaround Time: Researcher.Life and Scholarly Intelligence Join Hands to Empower Researchers with Publication Time Insights
Qualitative Research : Definition
Qualitative research is the naturalistic study of social meanings and processes, using interviews, observations, and the analysis of texts and images. In contrast to quantitative researchers, whose statistical methods enable broad generalizations about populations (for example, comparisons of the percentages of U.S. demographic groups who vote in particular ways), qualitative researchers use in-depth studies of the social world to analyze how and why groups think and act in particular ways (for instance, case studies of the experiences that shape political views).
Events and Workshops
- Introduction to NVivo Have you just collected your data and wondered what to do next? Come join us for an introductory session on utilizing NVivo to support your analytical process. This session will only cover features of the software and how to import your records. Please feel free to attend any of the following sessions below: April 25th, 2024 12:30 pm - 1:45 pm Green Library - SVA Conference Room 125 May 9th, 2024 12:30 pm - 1:45 pm Green Library - SVA Conference Room 125
- Next: Choose an approach >>
- Choose an approach
- Find studies
- Learn methods
- Getting Started
- Get software
- Get data for secondary analysis
- Network with researchers
![what is qualitative type of research Profile Photo](https://d2jv02qf7xgjwx.cloudfront.net/accounts/385106/profiles/394530/thumbnail__DSF2041_websize.jpg)
- Last Updated: Aug 9, 2024 2:09 PM
- URL: https://guides.library.stanford.edu/qualitative_research
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Methodology
- What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
Published on 4 April 2022 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on 30 January 2023.
Qualitative research involves collecting and analysing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.
Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research , which involves collecting and analysing numerical data for statistical analysis.
Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, and history.
- How does social media shape body image in teenagers?
- How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK?
- What factors influence employee retention in a large organisation?
- How is anxiety experienced around the world?
- How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums?
Table of contents
Approaches to qualitative research, qualitative research methods, qualitative data analysis, advantages of qualitative research, disadvantages of qualitative research, frequently asked questions about qualitative research.
Qualitative research is used to understand how people experience the world. While there are many approaches to qualitative research, they tend to be flexible and focus on retaining rich meaning when interpreting data.
Common approaches include grounded theory, ethnography, action research, phenomenological research, and narrative research. They share some similarities, but emphasise different aims and perspectives.
Approach | What does it involve? |
---|---|
Grounded theory | Researchers collect rich data on a topic of interest and develop theories . |
Researchers immerse themselves in groups or organisations to understand their cultures. | |
Researchers and participants collaboratively link theory to practice to drive social change. | |
Phenomenological research | Researchers investigate a phenomenon or event by describing and interpreting participants’ lived experiences. |
Narrative research | Researchers examine how stories are told to understand how participants perceive and make sense of their experiences. |
Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.
Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods . These are some of the most common qualitative methods:
- Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes.
- Interviews: personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations.
- Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among a group of people.
- Surveys : distributing questionnaires with open-ended questions.
- Secondary research: collecting existing data in the form of texts, images, audio or video recordings, etc.
- You take field notes with observations and reflect on your own experiences of the company culture.
- You distribute open-ended surveys to employees across all the company’s offices by email to find out if the culture varies across locations.
- You conduct in-depth interviews with employees in your office to learn about their experiences and perspectives in greater detail.
Qualitative researchers often consider themselves ‘instruments’ in research because all observations, interpretations and analyses are filtered through their own personal lens.
For this reason, when writing up your methodology for qualitative research, it’s important to reflect on your approach and to thoroughly explain the choices you made in collecting and analysing the data.
Qualitative data can take the form of texts, photos, videos and audio. For example, you might be working with interview transcripts, survey responses, fieldnotes, or recordings from natural settings.
Most types of qualitative data analysis share the same five steps:
- Prepare and organise your data. This may mean transcribing interviews or typing up fieldnotes.
- Review and explore your data. Examine the data for patterns or repeated ideas that emerge.
- Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of codes that you can apply to categorise your data.
- Assign codes to the data. For example, in qualitative survey analysis, this may mean going through each participant’s responses and tagging them with codes in a spreadsheet. As you go through your data, you can create new codes to add to your system if necessary.
- Identify recurring themes. Link codes together into cohesive, overarching themes.
There are several specific approaches to analysing qualitative data. Although these methods share similar processes, they emphasise different concepts.
Approach | When to use | Example |
---|---|---|
To describe and categorise common words, phrases, and ideas in qualitative data. | A market researcher could perform content analysis to find out what kind of language is used in descriptions of therapeutic apps. | |
To identify and interpret patterns and themes in qualitative data. | A psychologist could apply thematic analysis to travel blogs to explore how tourism shapes self-identity. | |
To examine the content, structure, and design of texts. | A media researcher could use textual analysis to understand how news coverage of celebrities has changed in the past decade. | |
To study communication and how language is used to achieve effects in specific contexts. | A political scientist could use discourse analysis to study how politicians generate trust in election campaigns. |
Qualitative research often tries to preserve the voice and perspective of participants and can be adjusted as new research questions arise. Qualitative research is good for:
- Flexibility
The data collection and analysis process can be adapted as new ideas or patterns emerge. They are not rigidly decided beforehand.
- Natural settings
Data collection occurs in real-world contexts or in naturalistic ways.
- Meaningful insights
Detailed descriptions of people’s experiences, feelings and perceptions can be used in designing, testing or improving systems or products.
- Generation of new ideas
Open-ended responses mean that researchers can uncover novel problems or opportunities that they wouldn’t have thought of otherwise.
Researchers must consider practical and theoretical limitations in analysing and interpreting their data. Qualitative research suffers from:
- Unreliability
The real-world setting often makes qualitative research unreliable because of uncontrolled factors that affect the data.
- Subjectivity
Due to the researcher’s primary role in analysing and interpreting data, qualitative research cannot be replicated . The researcher decides what is important and what is irrelevant in data analysis, so interpretations of the same data can vary greatly.
- Limited generalisability
Small samples are often used to gather detailed data about specific contexts. Despite rigorous analysis procedures, it is difficult to draw generalisable conclusions because the data may be biased and unrepresentative of the wider population .
- Labour-intensive
Although software can be used to manage and record large amounts of text, data analysis often has to be checked or performed manually.
Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.
Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.
There are five common approaches to qualitative research :
- Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories.
- Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organisation to understand its culture.
- Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions.
- Phenomenological research involves investigating phenomena through people’s lived experiences.
- Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes.
Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organisations.
There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:
- Prepare and organise your data.
- Review and explore your data.
- Develop a data coding system.
- Assign codes to the data.
- Identify recurring themes.
The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
Bhandari, P. (2023, January 30). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 29 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/introduction-to-qualitative-research/
Is this article helpful?
![what is qualitative type of research Pritha Bhandari](https://www.scribbr.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/pritha-author-pic.jpg)
Pritha Bhandari
- How to Order
![what is qualitative type of research User Icon](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2FuserIcon.5eaff246.webp&w=32&q=75)
Research Paper Guide
Types Of Qualitative Research
![what is qualitative type of research Nova A.](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fwriters%2Fnova-a.png&w=96&q=75)
8 Types of Qualitative Research - Overview & Examples
16 min read
![what is qualitative type of research types of qualitative research](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fblog%2Fresearch-paper-guide%2Ftypes-of-qualitative-research%2FTypes-of-Qualitative-Research-9373.jpg&w=640&q=75)
People also read
Research Paper Writing - A Step by Step Guide
Research Paper Examples - Free Sample Papers for Different Formats!
Guide to Creating Effective Research Paper Outline
Interesting Research Paper Topics for 2024
Research Proposal Writing - A Step-by-Step Guide
How to Start a Research Paper - 7 Easy Steps
How to Write an Abstract for a Research Paper - A Step by Step Guide
Writing a Literature Review For a Research Paper - A Comprehensive Guide
Qualitative Research - Methods, Types, and Examples
Qualitative vs Quantitative Research - Learning the Basics
200+ Engaging Psychology Research Paper Topics for Students in 2024
Learn How to Write a Hypothesis in a Research Paper: Examples and Tips!
20+ Types of Research With Examples - A Detailed Guide
Understanding Quantitative Research - Types & Data Collection Techniques
230+ Sociology Research Topics & Ideas for Students
How to Cite a Research Paper - A Complete Guide
Excellent History Research Paper Topics- 300+ Ideas
A Guide on Writing the Method Section of a Research Paper - Examples & Tips
How To Write an Introduction Paragraph For a Research Paper: Learn with Examples
Crafting a Winning Research Paper Title: A Complete Guide
Writing a Research Paper Conclusion - Step-by-Step Guide
Writing a Thesis For a Research Paper - A Comprehensive Guide
How To Write A Discussion For A Research Paper | Examples & Tips
How To Write The Results Section of A Research Paper | Steps & Examples
Writing a Problem Statement for a Research Paper - A Comprehensive Guide
Finding Sources For a Research Paper: A Complete Guide
A Guide on How to Edit a Research Paper
200+ Ethical Research Paper Topics to Begin With (2024)
300+ Controversial Research Paper Topics & Ideas - 2024 Edition
150+ Argumentative Research Paper Topics For You - 2024
How to Write a Research Methodology for a Research Paper
Are you overwhelmed by the multitude of qualitative research methods available? It's no secret that choosing the right approach can leave you stuck at the starting line of your research.
Selecting an unsuitable method can lead to wasted time, resources, and potentially skewed results. But with so many options to consider, it's easy to feel lost in the complexities of qualitative research.
In this comprehensive guide, we will explain the types of qualitative research, their unique characteristics, advantages, and best use cases for each method.
Let's dive in!
![what is qualitative type of research Order Essay](https://assets.myperfectwords.com/blog/essay-writing-guide/essay-topics/cta-img.png)
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!
![what is qualitative type of research Arrow Down](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Farrow-down.10381593.webp&w=48&q=75)
- 1. What is Qualitative Research?
- 2. Types of Qualitative Research Methods
- 3. Types of Data Analysis in Qualitative Research
What is Qualitative Research?
Qualitative research is a robust and flexible methodology used to explore and understand complex phenomena in-depth.
Unlike quantitative research , qualitative research dives into the rich and complex aspects of human experiences, behaviors, and perceptions.
At its core, this type of research question seek to answer for:
- Why do people think or behave a certain way?
- What are the underlying motivations and meanings behind actions?
- How do individuals perceive and interpret the world around them?
This approach values context, diversity, and the unique perspectives of participants.
Rather than seeking generalizable findings applicable to a broad population, qualitative research aims for detailed insights, patterns, and themes that come from the people being studied.
Characteristics of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research possesses the following characteristics:
- Subjective Perspective: Qualitative research explores subjective experiences, emphasizing the uniqueness of human behavior and opinions.
- In-Depth Exploration: It involves deep investigation, allowing a comprehensive understanding of specific phenomena.
- Open-Ended Questions: Qualitative research uses open-ended questions to encourage detailed, descriptive responses.
- Contextual Understanding: It emphasizes the importance of understanding the research context and setting.
- Rich Descriptions: Qualitative research produces rich, descriptive findings that contribute to a nuanced understanding of the topic.
Types of Qualitative Research Methods
Researchers collect data on the targeted population, place, or event by using different types of qualitative research analysis.
Each qualitative research method offers a distinct perspective, enabling researchers to reveal concealed meanings, patterns, and valuable insights.
Below are the most commonly used qualitative research types for writing a paper.
Ethnographic Research Method
| To describe and understand cultural characteristics within human societies. |
| Gathering existing knowledge and insights from academic and historical sources. Immersion in the environment where the target audience resides, living with and interacting with subjects. Data collection through extensive observation and direct engagement. |
| The analysis phase aims to describe the fundamental parameters of the culture under study. |
| Comprehensive descriptions of social norms, values, customs, and practices within the studied culture. |
Ethnography, a subfield of anthropology, provides a scientific approach to examining human societies and cultures. It ranks among the most widely employed qualitative research techniques.
In ethnographic field notes, researchers actively engage with the environment and live alongside the focus group.
This immersive interaction allows researchers to gain insights into the objectives, motivations, challenges, and distinctive cultural attributes of the individuals under study.
Key cultural characteristics that ethnography helps to illustrate encompass:
- Geographical Location
- Religious Practices
- Tribal Systems
- Shared Experiences
Unlike traditional survey and interview-based research methods, ethnographers don't rely on structured questioning.
Instead, they become observers within the community, emphasizing participant observation over an extended period. However, it may also be appropriate to complement observations with interviews of individuals who possess knowledge of the culture.
Ethnographic research can present challenges if the researcher is unfamiliar with the social norms and language of the group being studied.
Furthermore, interpretations made by outsiders may lead to misinterpretations or confusion. Therefore, thorough validation of data is essential before presenting findings.
An effective way to understand customer needs is by observing their daily activities and interactions with a product. This approach doesn't necessitate formulating hypotheses for testing but instead requires immersion in the subjects' social lives. |
Narrative Method
| Collect data in the form of a cohesive story. |
| Examining the sequence of events and conducting interviews to describe the significant influences that have shaped an individual's life. Analyzing various life situations and opportunities that have played a role in the individual's narrative. |
| Presenting a short narrative that includes themes, conflicts, and challenges. |
The narrative research design unfolds over an extended period to compile data, much like crafting a cohesive story. Similar to a narrative structure, it begins with a starting point and progresses through various life situations.
In this method, researchers engage in in-depth interviews and review relevant documents. They explore events that have had a significant impact on an individual's personality and life journey. Interviews may occur over weeks, months, or even years, depending on the depth and scope of the narrative being studied.
The outcome of narrative research is the presentation of a concise story that captures essential themes, conflicts, and challenges. It provides a holistic view of the individual's experiences, both positive and negative, which have shaped their unique narrative.
The narrative method finds practical application in the business world. It can help in understanding the diverse challenges faced by a target audience. Moreover, it can be leveraged to foster innovation and guide the development of products and solutions that resonate with the audience's narrative. |
Phenomenological Method
| To describe experiences, events, or situations from various perspectives. |
| Collecting data through interviews, observations, surveys, and document analysis. Articulating the experiences related to the phenomenon under study. |
| Classifying data and exploring experiences beyond conscious awareness. |
| Creation of a database that presents findings from the subject's viewpoint. |
The term "phenomenological" pertains to the study of phenomena, which can encompass events, situations, or experiences.
This method is ideal for examining a subject from multiple perspectives and contributing to existing knowledge, with a particular focus on subjective experiences.
Researchers employing the phenomenological method use various data collection techniques, including interviews, site visits, observations, surveys, and document reviews.
These methods help gather rich and diverse data about the phenomenon under investigation.
A central aspect of this technique is capturing how participants experience events or activities, delving into their subjective viewpoints. Ultimately, the research results in the creation of a thematic database that validates the findings and offers insights from the subject's perspective.
The phenomenological research method is valuable for understanding why students are increasingly opting for online courses. It allows researchers to explore the reasons behind this trend from the subjective experiences of students, providing valuable insights into their motivations and preferences. |
Grounded Theory Method
| To develop theories, identify social developments, and understand ways to address them. |
| Gathering data through interviews, observations, literature reviews, and document analysis. Developing theories through a systematic process of data collection, coding, and theory formation. |
| The development of theories is supported by relevant examples drawn from the collected data. |
A grounded theory approach differs from a phenomenological study in that it seeks to explain, provide reasons for, or develop theories behind an event or phenomenon.
It serves as a means to construct new theories by systematically collecting and analyzing data related to a specific phenomenon.
Researchers employing the grounded theory method utilize a variety of data collection techniques, including observation, interviews, literature review , and the analysis of relevant documents.
The focus of content analysis is not individual behaviors but a specific phenomenon or incident.
This method typically involves various coding techniques and large sample sizes to identify themes and develop more comprehensive theories.
Businesses can employ this method to conduct surveys and gain insight into why consumers choose their products or services. The data collected through such surveys can aid companies in enhancing and maintaining customer satisfaction and loyalty. |
Case Study Research
| To provide a detailed description of an experience, person, event, or place. |
| Gaining a deep understanding of the subject through firsthand experiences and engagement. |
| Analyzing the experiences and insights gained from the case study. |
| Delivering an in-depth and comprehensive description of the subject under study. |
The case study approach entails a comprehensive examination of a subject over an extended period, with a focus on providing detailed insights into the subject, which can be an event, person, business, or place.
Data for case studies is collected from diverse sources, including interviews, direct observation, historical records, and documentation.
Case studies find applications across various disciplines, including law, education, medicine, and the sciences. They can serve both descriptive and explanatory purposes, making them a versatile research methodology .
Researchers often turn to the case study method when they want to explore:
- 'How' and 'why' research questions
- Behaviors under observation
- Understanding a specific phenomenon
- The contextual factors influencing the phenomena
Businesses can effectively showcase their solutions and problem-solving capabilities through case studies. Let's consider a scenario where Company AB introduces new UX designs in an agile environment. This case study can offer valuable insights for other companies seeking similar enhancements. |
Historical Method
| To describe and examine past events for a better understanding of present patterns and the ability to predict future scenarios. |
| |
| Analyzing the collected data by assessing its credibility and considering conflicting evidence. |
| Presenting the research findings in the form of a biography or scholarly paper. |
The historical method aims to describe and analyze past events, offering insights into present patterns and the potential to predict future scenarios.
Researchers formulate research questions based on a hypothetical idea and then rigorously test this idea using multiple historical resources.
Key steps in the historical method include:
- Developing a research idea
- Identifying appropriate sources such as archives and libraries
- Ensuring the reliability and validity of these sources
- Creating a well-organized research outline
- Systematically collecting research data
The analysis phase involves critically assessing the collected data, accepting or rejecting it based on credibility, and identifying any conflicting evidence.
Ultimately, the outcomes of the historical method are presented in the form of a biography or a scholarly paper that provides a comprehensive account of the research findings.
Businesses can harness the historical method by examining past ad campaigns and the demographics they target. This historical data can inform the creation of new ads and help tailor qualitative market research strategies for better outcomes. |
Action Research
| To improve and address practical issues, problems, or challenges in real-world settings by taking action and conducting research simultaneously. |
| |
| The outcomes of action research include practical solutions, improved practices, and enhanced understanding of the issue. |
Action research is a dynamic research approach focused on addressing practical challenges in real-world settings while simultaneously conducting research to improve the situation.
It follows a cyclic process, starting with the identification of a specific issue or problem in a particular context.
The key steps in action research include:
- Planning and implementing actions to address the issue
- Collecting data during the action phase to understand its impact
- Reflecting on the data and analyzing it to gain insights
- Adjusting the action plan based on the analysis
This process may be iterative, with multiple cycles of action and reflection.
The outcomes of action research are practical solutions and improved practices that directly benefit the context in which the research is conducted. Additionally, it leads to a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the issue under investigation.
In education, action research can be used by teachers to identify and address classroom challenges. For instance, a teacher may recognize that a particular teaching method is not effectively engaging students. Through action research, the teacher can develop and implement new teaching strategies, collect data on their effectiveness, analyze the results, and refine the teaching approach to enhance student learning outcomes. |
Focus Groups
| To gather qualitative data by engaging a small group of participants in a structured discussion on a specific topic or research question. |
| |
| Analyzing the data collected from the focus group discussion to identify themes, patterns, and insights. |
| The outcomes of focus groups include rich qualitative data that provide a deeper understanding of the research topic or question. |
Focus groups are a qualitative research method used to gather in-depth insights and perspectives on a specific topic or research question.
This approach involves assembling a small group of participants who possess relevant knowledge or experiences related to the research focus.
Key steps in the focus group method include:
- Selecting participants
- Moderating the discussion
- Structuring the conversation around open-ended questions
- Collecting data through audio or video recordings and note-taking
The discussion is dynamic and interactive, encouraging participants to share their thoughts, experiences, and opinions.
The analysis phase involves reviewing the data collected from the focus group discussion to identify common themes, patterns, and valuable insights. Focus groups provide rich qualitative data that offer a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the research topic or question.
In the development of a new mobile app, a focus group can be organized with potential users to gather feedback on user interface design and functionality. Participants in the focus group can share their preferences, concerns, and suggestions, providing valuable input to improve the app's usability and appeal. |
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!
Types of Data Analysis in Qualitative Research
Qualitative research employs different data analysis methods, each suited to specific research goals:
- Thematic Analysis: Identifies recurring themes or concepts within data.
- Content Analysis: Systematically categorizes and quantifies text or media content.
- Narrative Analysis: Focuses on storytelling and narrative elements in data.
- Grounded Theory Analysis: Develops or refines theories based on data.
- Discourse Analysis: Examines language and communication patterns.
- Framework Analysis: Organizes data using predefined categories.
- Visual Analysis: Interprets visual data like photos or videos.
- Cross-case Analysis: Compares patterns across multiple cases.
The choice depends on research questions and data type, enhancing understanding and insights.
Benefits of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research offers valuable advantages, including:
- Flexibility: Adaptable to various research questions and settings.
- Holistic Approach: Explores multiple dimensions of phenomena.
- Theory Development: Contributes to theory creation or refinement.
- Participant Engagement: Fosters active participant involvement.
- Complements Quantitative Research: Provides a comprehensive understanding.
All in all, different types of qualitative research methodology can assist in understanding the behavior and motivations of people. Similarly, it will also help in generating original ideas and formulating a better research problem.
However, not everyone can write a good research paper. Thus, if you get stuck at any stage, you can get professional help.
MyPerfectWords.com is the best paper writing service, where you can hire a professional writer for all your ' do my essay ' requests.
We assure you that you will receive high-quality paper at the most reasonable rates.
Contact our team with your " pay for my research paper " queries. We are available 24/7!
![what is qualitative type of research AI Essay Bot](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Fai-bot.ab29c1e6.png&w=640&q=75)
Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!
![what is qualitative type of research Nova A.](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fwriters%2Fnova-a.png&w=256&q=75)
Nova Allison is a Digital Content Strategist with over eight years of experience. Nova has also worked as a technical and scientific writer. She is majorly involved in developing and reviewing online content plans that engage and resonate with audiences. Nova has a passion for writing that engages and informs her readers.
![what is qualitative type of research Get Help](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Fget-help-new.761ad6e7.webp&w=384&q=75)
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!
Keep reading
![what is qualitative type of research research paper](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fblog%2Fresearch-paper-guide%2FResearch-Paper-9370.jpg&w=828&q=75)
- UConn Library
- Scientific Research and Communication
- Qualitative Research: What is it?
Scientific Research and Communication — Qualitative Research: What is it?
- Essential Resources
- The Scientific Method
- Types of Scientific Papers
- Organization of a Scientific Paper
- Peer Review & Academic Journals
- Primary and Secondary Sources
- Scientific Information Literacy
- Critical Reading Methods
- Scientific Writing Guidebooks
- Science Literature Reviews
- Searching Strategies for Science Databases
- Engineering Career Exploration
- Quantitative Research: What Is It?
- AI Tools for Research
- Avoiding Plagiarism
What is qualitative research?
"Qualitative research is a type of research that explores and provides deeper insights into real-world problems. [1] Instead of collecting numerical data points or intervene or introduce treatments just like in quantitative research, qualitative research helps generate hypotheses as well as further investigate and understand quantitative data."
"Qualitative research at its core, ask open-ended questions whose answers are not easily put into numbers such as ‘how’ and ‘why’. [2] Due to the open-ended nature of the research questions at hand, qualitative research design is often not linear in the same way quantitative design is. [2] One of the strengths of qualitative research is its ability to explain processes and patterns of human behavior that can be difficult to quantify. [3] Phenomena such as experiences, attitudes, and behaviors can be difficult to accurately capture quantitatively, whereas a qualitative approach allows participants themselves to explain how, why, or what they were thinking, feeling, and experiencing at a certain time or during an event of interest."
- Qualitative Study - Steven Tenny; Grace D. Brannan; Janelle M. Brannan; Nancy C. Sharts-Hopko. This article details what qualitative research is, and some of the methodologies used.
Examples of Qualitative Research
![what is qualitative type of research Chart showing examples of qualitative and quantitative research for comparison](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/139843/images/qualitative-quantitative-chart.png)
- Quantitative vs Qualitative Chart Chart showing examples of quantitative vs. qualitative research.
EBooks on Qualitative Research Methodology
Physical Library Books
- << Previous: Engineering Career Exploration
- Next: Quantitative Research: What Is It? >>
- Last Updated: Aug 27, 2024 9:58 AM
- URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/sciencecommunication
![what is qualitative type of research Creative Commons](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/customers/757/images/by-nc.png)
![what is qualitative type of research Banner Image](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/362450/images/UTA-LOG0-Libguides.png)
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
- I NEED TO . . .
- What is Quantitative Research?
- What is Qualitative Research?
- Quantitative vs Qualitative
- Step 1: Accessing CINAHL
- Step 2: Create a Keyword Search
- Step 3: Create a Subject Heading Search
- Step 4: Repeat Steps 1-3 for Second Concept
- Step 5: Repeat Steps 1-3 for Quantitative Terms
- Step 6: Combining All Searches
- Step 7: Adding Limiters
- Step 8: Save Your Search!
- What Kind of Article is This?
- More Research Help This link opens in a new window
What is qualitative research?
Qualitative research is a process of naturalistic inquiry that seeks an in-depth understanding of social phenomena within their natural setting. It focuses on the "why" rather than the "what" of social phenomena and relies on the direct experiences of human beings as meaning-making agents in their every day lives. Rather than by logical and statistical procedures, qualitative researchers use multiple systems of inquiry for the study of human phenomena including biography, case study, historical analysis, discourse analysis, ethnography, grounded theory, and phenomenology.
University of Utah College of Nursing, (n.d.). What is qualitative research? [Guide] Retrieved from https://nursing.utah.edu/research/qualitative-research/what-is-qualitative-research.php#what
The following video will explain the fundamentals of qualitative research.
- << Previous: What is Quantitative Research?
- Next: Quantitative vs Qualitative >>
- Last Updated: Aug 19, 2024 2:09 PM
- URL: https://libguides.uta.edu/quantitative_and_qualitative_research
University of Texas Arlington Libraries 702 Planetarium Place · Arlington, TX 76019 · 817-272-3000
- Internet Privacy
- Accessibility
- Problems with a guide? Contact Us.
What are the different types of qualitative research?
Last updated
8 February 2023
Reviewed by
Jean Kaluza
Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead
Qualitative research is a crucial step in product development . While the quantitative approach might explain where an issue lies and the number of users it affects, the qualitative method answers why the problem is happening and how it affects customers.
This type of research explains how people experience the world. Many researchers use it to understand a group’s behavior, characteristics, and motivations.
People also use qualitative research in the business sector. Qualitative research enables you to access content-rich information about user emotions and perceptions. For example, you can use it in market research to understand what a target group thinks about your company’s new ideas.
Different qualitative research types serve a particular purpose. Before we delve into the various types of qualitative research, let's begin with the basics.
Analyze all your qualitative research
Analyze qualitative data faster and surface more actionable insights
- What is qualitative research?
Qualitative research is a market research process that involves collecting and analyzing in-depth data through conversational and open-ended communication. It focuses on "what" people think and "why" they think so. Qualitative research goes beyond how many people do something to determine why they do or don't do it.
Qualitative research methods enable detailed questioning of respondents based on their responses. The researcher’s aim is to understand the participants’ feelings and motivations.
Imagine a cake company looking to get more customers at two branches on the same street. A systematic observation showed more people bought cakes from Branch A than from Branch B. One way to determine why people preferred Branch A is to interview potential customers.
Let's say the company visited both stores and interviewed customers. Upon completion, results showed that workers in Branch B lacked good customer relationships, so many people visited Branch A instead.
Another example is if marketing notices a consistent but unexplainable churn in customers. Maybe subscribers of the platform were only staying on for a month rather than a much longer expected timeline.
Qualitative initiatives could dive into the motivations of these users. Findings may reveal that the customers achieved their goals much faster than expected. Perhaps they didn’t have the characteristics the company originally assumed they had.
Qualitative research identifies customer pain points, determines why a particular product might not yield the desired results, and tests possible solutions. It’s a helpful tool when you’re looking to develop and improve products and services. Understanding how your audience makes decisions can help you draw valuable conclusions in market research.
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/7CszC04ZhmBtH7L4YT1VUU/14f6fb929cee0d02e003c00ca5437444/research.png?w=256&h=160&q=80&fm=png)
Learn more about qualitative research platforms
- Characteristics of qualitative research methods
Qualitative research involves collecting and evaluating non-numerical data (audio, video, and text) to deeply understand opinions, concepts, or experiences. It also includes data about lived experiences, emotions, and behavior with the meaning people add to it.
Due to its softer manner, researchers express results more commonly in:
Video clips
Sound bites
Pull quotes
Here are the characteristics of qualitative research.
Real-time data
Qualitative research methods often collect data at the location where people encounter the product or company’s service. This ensures it’s as close to the authentic experience of its consumers as possible.
Many data sources
Qualitative researchers don't need to rely on a single source of data . They can gather different data types from sources like observations, interviews, and documents for better understanding.
Qualitative research techniques tend to break down complex problems into smaller, simpler pieces that focus on what the research intends to evaluate. The goal is to have a clear understanding of the unknown. That means you can uncover answers while leaving room for surprises and discoveries to emerge.
Raw information
Since qualitative research involves conversations, participants should be able to confide in the interviewer and give their honest opinions. Researchers should use qualitative interviewing techniques to establish trust and comfort in participants to facilitate authentic and pure reactions to products. That’s why you need to ensure the information you provide is accurate.
Free AI content analysis generator
Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/76gOBiC91O5cj02edxTX0t/385646b46c425b354a88e2a1e09d9739/AI_content_analysis_thumbnail.png?w=460&h=392&q=80&fm=png)
- Types of qualitative research methods with examples
Qualitative research methods reveal your target audiences' behavior and perception of a particular situation. Its results are more detailed and descriptive, so you can easily draw inferences from the data.
Each qualitative research type has its purpose and might not be suitable for all projects. Before conducting a qualitative study, it's crucial to understand the various types of qualitative research methods and how they differ.
Let's look at each of the six types of qualitative research methods.
1. Phenomenological method
The phenomenological approach explores the experiences of a specific phenomenon (observable fact or event) in a person or group. These are “lived experiences.”
The method helps researchers better understand people's beliefs, attitudes, behavior, and experiences. In this method, you ask customers to describe their experiences as they perceive them. This approach recognizes there is no single objective reality; everyone experiences things differently.
Researchers usually set their assumptions aside to remove bias (bracketing) and focus on the participants’ experiences.
While the outcome depends on the participants' points of view, researchers try to answer the following questions:
How do people experience this phenomenon?
How does it affect them?
What factors influence their experience?
This method uses information from interviews, observations, diary studies, or voice-of-customer sessions to determine a participant's feelings during a particular activity or event. During this research, it's vital to make your customers feel comfortable, so they share their honest experiences.
Your questions in phenomenological research should be free of closed-ended or leading questions. Closed-ended questions usually only require a simple one-word response and won’t tell the whole story or give you the actionable data you want to collect.
Leading questions require your user to contradict what your question may imply. This usually results in polite and natural agreement rather than the honest response you need. In short, don’t ask them if they like a feature. Ask your user how they feel about it, either positive or negative, and let them direct the discussion from there.
You can use this method to determine your customer's purchasing behavior. For example, you can ask questions like, "Do you prefer red velvet cake or vanilla cake? Why?" The responses will depend on their experiences. The result of this research method can be useful when you want to improve your product's quality or target a different product to increase sales.
2. Ethnographic model
This model is an in-depth observation that studies your target audience in their natural environment. It involves collecting and analyzing data about people by watching them rather than interviewing them. Quite often, consumers may report using a particular product in one way, but observing could prove otherwise.
It requires researchers to adapt to the environment of their target audience. Since it could be any location, collecting data can be challenging. But this model helps you understand the challenges, cultures, settings, and motivations that occur by seeing it yourself. With well-executed ethnographic research, your company can uncover:
Users' motivations behind using your product
How they’re using it
During what other activities are they using it
How they discovered it
And even why they stopped using it
All of these insights can help you build a more intuitive product experience that leaves consumers feeling heard and satisfied.
Companies that act on accurate ethnographic studies are often way ahead of their competitors since they have a clear idea of where their customers are and where they are going.
3. Grounded theory method
Sociologists Glaser and Strauss developed the grounded theory model in the 1960s. In this model, researchers collect, interpret, and analyze data to develop various theories regarding the research topic. Rather than establish theories before examining data, researchers develop theories after studying the data.
Researchers use this model in qualitative research to see what theories or questions arise from a given data set. They may group the drawn-out theories and analyze them further. Grounded theory needs careful content analysis since the emerging theories must be valid, else it can lead to lost insights and poor decision-making.
It is often a research method that builds on existing work. Data collection methods include interviews, observations, longitudinal studies , and diary studies.
4. Case study model
The case study model helps explain a particular element, family, person, business, or organization. It is common in fields like education and social sciences. Ways of collecting data in this model may include interviews since the research requires in-depth and real details. The researcher will ask questions to determine why a particular respondent acts the way they do.
For instance, a film streaming company might watch a family use their technology to determine their reaction to new services or products and what features could interest them.
5. Historical model
Historical studies involve identifying, locating, evaluating, and synthesizing data from the past. It doesn't only discover past events but tries to relate them to the present and future.
For instance, you can analyze data from previous advertising campaigns and use it to conduct a new one. Or a music management company can look at the audience from a 2022 concert to plan future ones.
Historical research requires great skill. Researchers must analyze the data, look for trends or changes, or pinpoint any contradictions. You can ask questions to design your research strategy, like, "How has consumer preference changed over the years?"
Sometimes, historical data can collect irrelevant data. Let’s consider how airlines experienced so much turmoil during the pandemic. It’s possible the historical data isn’t relevant enough to gather useful data from in a post-pandemic world.
6. Narrative model
The narrative method is one of the types of qualitative research methods that focuses on written and spoken words or visual representations by people. Here, stories become raw data.
Researchers evaluate people's lived experiences through questioning to determine issues they may face. This research method helps you understand what people think about your brand. You can use it to determine the various challenges your target audience faces on a personal narrative level.
- Qualitative research data collection
This is the process of obtaining information. Qualitative data collection involves obtaining non-numerical data. It provides researchers with detailed insights into why people make decisions. But to arrive at such conclusions, the collected data should be rich, holistic, and from participants that accurately represent your targeted audience.
Some ways to collect data in qualitative research include:
Participant observations
You collect data by watching other people's behavior closely and recording what you hear, see, or encounter.
One-on-one interviews
This involves an open-ended conversation with your target audience. The interview can be via phone, email, or face-to-face.
In-depth surveys
This may involve distributing a questionnaire with open-ended questions.
Focus groups
Here, a moderator asks participants (usually 6–12 members) predetermined questions about your products, brand, or services. It's crucial to avoid yes-or-no questions to promote engagement.
Voice-of-customer
Here, the moderator comes up with a feature or product concept and brainstorms the idea with a customer. The customer plays an active role in shaping the concept to ensure the feature really would be a solution for them.
Card-sorting
This method involves index cards with written content about a given service or product. The moderator asks the participant to think out loud while organizing cards in ways that make sense to the user.
Diary studies
Diary studies require users to keep a journal or diary of specific experiences and their thoughts around them. These studies typically take longer to complete the data-gathering stage.
Regardless of the method you use for collecting qualitative data, it will generate a large amount of data. For example, if a researcher uses one-on-one discussions or a focus group to collect data, there will be video recordings or written notes to analyze.
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/5vVk6qw1sQnmuJyslEfhZB/c085e415b09917113560f8795843cedc/Diary_study_analysis_hero.png?w=256&h=160&q=80&fm=png)
Diary study templates
- Qualitative research data analysis
Qualitative data analysis involves examining data to understand and derive meaning from it. It involves making notes, recording videos or audio, taking photos, or analyzing text documents.
Here are the steps involved in qualitative data analysis:
Prepare and organize your data: This could mean typing notes during sessions, including timestamps, or transcribing your audio.
Review and explore the data: Check the data for repeated patterns or ideas that emerge.
Create codes for the data and assign them : Develop a set of codes to separate your data into categories and assign them.
Spot recurring themes : Link codes together into overarching, cohesive themes.
Learn more about qualitative research data analysis software
- When to use qualitative research
Researchers use qualitative research methods to get factual data for in-depth insights. You can use qualitative research when you want to:
Develop a new product or generate an idea.
Understand the problem areas of your product or service thoroughly.
Improve your marketing strategy.
Understand your weaknesses and strengths according to your users.
Deeply explore potential consumers’ motivations, desires, and demographics to understand your company’s role within them.
Figure out how people perceive your brand, product, or services.
Stay well ahead of your competition by knowing your users better than they do.
Qualitative research helps brands understand the underlying motivations and reasons behind consumer behavior and decisions.
- Qualitative research methods vs. quantitative research methods
In a nutshell, qualitative research methods revolve around people's perspectives and their reasoning to solve the “why” and “how.” Quantitative research methods center on measurements and numbers to uncover what is happening and sometimes the timeline in which it happened.
Together, both research methods help companies get an accurate and in-depth insight into a situation. It’s important to understand their significant differences to know when to employ each.
Here is a table to help you understand how both research methods differ.
|
|
|
| Focuses on user motivations, “how” they do things, and "why" they think in that manner | Centers on the "what" and "when " of what happened in the data |
| Descriptive data | Numerical data |
| Holistic | Particularistic |
| Less-structured methods like focus groups, scripted in-depth interviews, participant observation, and case study | Structured methods like in-app data, surveys, and questionnaires |
| More personal and direct contact with participants | Less personal and direct contact with participants |
| Open-ended | Close-ended |
| User responses can influence what question the researcher will ask next | User responses don't usually affect what question the researcher asks next |
| Why do you prefer green apples? | Did you buy a green apple today? A. Yes B. No |
What is the most common type of qualitative research?
A detailed interview is the most common type of qualitative research approach.
What is the most common form of qualitative interviewing?
A semi-structured interview is the most common form of qualitative interviewing. User testing is considered a qualitative interview in a one-on-one live environment.
What is the most common method used for qualitative data analysis?
Pattern matching is one of the commonest methods used for qualitative data analysis. Pattern matching involves forming a mental model to categorize all collected data into compartments to compare and evaluate.
Should you be using a customer insights hub?
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Editor’s picks
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 22 August 2024
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 August 2024
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 30 April 2024
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Latest articles
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.
Get started for free
Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
The main difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the type of data they collect and analyze.
Quantitative data is information about quantities, and therefore numbers, and qualitative data is descriptive, and regards phenomenon which can be observed but not measured, such as language.
- Quantitative research collects numerical data and analyzes it using statistical methods. The aim is to produce objective, empirical data that can be measured and expressed numerically. Quantitative research is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and make predictions.
- Qualitative research gathers non-numerical data (words, images, sounds) to explore subjective experiences and attitudes, often via observation and interviews. It aims to produce detailed descriptions and uncover new insights about the studied phenomenon.
On This Page:
What Is Qualitative Research?
Qualitative research is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data, such as language. Qualitative research can be used to understand how an individual subjectively perceives and gives meaning to their social reality.
Qualitative data is non-numerical data, such as text, video, photographs, or audio recordings. This type of data can be collected using diary accounts or in-depth interviews and analyzed using grounded theory or thematic analysis.
Qualitative research is multimethod in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 2)
Interest in qualitative data came about as the result of the dissatisfaction of some psychologists (e.g., Carl Rogers) with the scientific study of psychologists such as behaviorists (e.g., Skinner ).
Since psychologists study people, the traditional approach to science is not seen as an appropriate way of carrying out research since it fails to capture the totality of human experience and the essence of being human. Exploring participants’ experiences is known as a phenomenological approach (re: Humanism ).
Qualitative research is primarily concerned with meaning, subjectivity, and lived experience. The goal is to understand the quality and texture of people’s experiences, how they make sense of them, and the implications for their lives.
Qualitative research aims to understand the social reality of individuals, groups, and cultures as nearly as possible as participants feel or live it. Thus, people and groups are studied in their natural setting.
Some examples of qualitative research questions are provided, such as what an experience feels like, how people talk about something, how they make sense of an experience, and how events unfold for people.
Research following a qualitative approach is exploratory and seeks to explain ‘how’ and ‘why’ a particular phenomenon, or behavior, operates as it does in a particular context. It can be used to generate hypotheses and theories from the data.
Qualitative Methods
There are different types of qualitative research methods, including diary accounts, in-depth interviews , documents, focus groups , case study research , and ethnography .
The results of qualitative methods provide a deep understanding of how people perceive their social realities and in consequence, how they act within the social world.
The researcher has several methods for collecting empirical materials, ranging from the interview to direct observation, to the analysis of artifacts, documents, and cultural records, to the use of visual materials or personal experience. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 14)
Here are some examples of qualitative data:
Interview transcripts : Verbatim records of what participants said during an interview or focus group. They allow researchers to identify common themes and patterns, and draw conclusions based on the data. Interview transcripts can also be useful in providing direct quotes and examples to support research findings.
Observations : The researcher typically takes detailed notes on what they observe, including any contextual information, nonverbal cues, or other relevant details. The resulting observational data can be analyzed to gain insights into social phenomena, such as human behavior, social interactions, and cultural practices.
Unstructured interviews : generate qualitative data through the use of open questions. This allows the respondent to talk in some depth, choosing their own words. This helps the researcher develop a real sense of a person’s understanding of a situation.
Diaries or journals : Written accounts of personal experiences or reflections.
Notice that qualitative data could be much more than just words or text. Photographs, videos, sound recordings, and so on, can be considered qualitative data. Visual data can be used to understand behaviors, environments, and social interactions.
Qualitative Data Analysis
Qualitative research is endlessly creative and interpretive. The researcher does not just leave the field with mountains of empirical data and then easily write up his or her findings.
Qualitative interpretations are constructed, and various techniques can be used to make sense of the data, such as content analysis, grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), or discourse analysis .
For example, thematic analysis is a qualitative approach that involves identifying implicit or explicit ideas within the data. Themes will often emerge once the data has been coded .
![Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis 2 RESEARCH THEMATICANALYSISMETHOD](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/RESEARCH-THEMATICANALYSISMETHOD.jpg)
Key Features
- Events can be understood adequately only if they are seen in context. Therefore, a qualitative researcher immerses her/himself in the field, in natural surroundings. The contexts of inquiry are not contrived; they are natural. Nothing is predefined or taken for granted.
- Qualitative researchers want those who are studied to speak for themselves, to provide their perspectives in words and other actions. Therefore, qualitative research is an interactive process in which the persons studied teach the researcher about their lives.
- The qualitative researcher is an integral part of the data; without the active participation of the researcher, no data exists.
- The study’s design evolves during the research and can be adjusted or changed as it progresses. For the qualitative researcher, there is no single reality. It is subjective and exists only in reference to the observer.
- The theory is data-driven and emerges as part of the research process, evolving from the data as they are collected.
Limitations of Qualitative Research
- Because of the time and costs involved, qualitative designs do not generally draw samples from large-scale data sets.
- The problem of adequate validity or reliability is a major criticism. Because of the subjective nature of qualitative data and its origin in single contexts, it is difficult to apply conventional standards of reliability and validity. For example, because of the central role played by the researcher in the generation of data, it is not possible to replicate qualitative studies.
- Also, contexts, situations, events, conditions, and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent, nor can generalizations be made to a wider context than the one studied with confidence.
- The time required for data collection, analysis, and interpretation is lengthy. Analysis of qualitative data is difficult, and expert knowledge of an area is necessary to interpret qualitative data. Great care must be taken when doing so, for example, looking for mental illness symptoms.
Advantages of Qualitative Research
- Because of close researcher involvement, the researcher gains an insider’s view of the field. This allows the researcher to find issues that are often missed (such as subtleties and complexities) by the scientific, more positivistic inquiries.
- Qualitative descriptions can be important in suggesting possible relationships, causes, effects, and dynamic processes.
- Qualitative analysis allows for ambiguities/contradictions in the data, which reflect social reality (Denscombe, 2010).
- Qualitative research uses a descriptive, narrative style; this research might be of particular benefit to the practitioner as she or he could turn to qualitative reports to examine forms of knowledge that might otherwise be unavailable, thereby gaining new insight.
What Is Quantitative Research?
Quantitative research involves the process of objectively collecting and analyzing numerical data to describe, predict, or control variables of interest.
The goals of quantitative research are to test causal relationships between variables , make predictions, and generalize results to wider populations.
Quantitative researchers aim to establish general laws of behavior and phenomenon across different settings/contexts. Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.
Quantitative Methods
Experiments typically yield quantitative data, as they are concerned with measuring things. However, other research methods, such as controlled observations and questionnaires , can produce both quantitative information.
For example, a rating scale or closed questions on a questionnaire would generate quantitative data as these produce either numerical data or data that can be put into categories (e.g., “yes,” “no” answers).
Experimental methods limit how research participants react to and express appropriate social behavior.
Findings are, therefore, likely to be context-bound and simply a reflection of the assumptions that the researcher brings to the investigation.
There are numerous examples of quantitative data in psychological research, including mental health. Here are a few examples:
Another example is the Experience in Close Relationships Scale (ECR), a self-report questionnaire widely used to assess adult attachment styles .
The ECR provides quantitative data that can be used to assess attachment styles and predict relationship outcomes.
Neuroimaging data : Neuroimaging techniques, such as MRI and fMRI, provide quantitative data on brain structure and function.
This data can be analyzed to identify brain regions involved in specific mental processes or disorders.
For example, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a clinician-administered questionnaire widely used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals.
The BDI consists of 21 questions, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Quantitative Data Analysis
Statistics help us turn quantitative data into useful information to help with decision-making. We can use statistics to summarize our data, describing patterns, relationships, and connections. Statistics can be descriptive or inferential.
Descriptive statistics help us to summarize our data. In contrast, inferential statistics are used to identify statistically significant differences between groups of data (such as intervention and control groups in a randomized control study).
- Quantitative researchers try to control extraneous variables by conducting their studies in the lab.
- The research aims for objectivity (i.e., without bias) and is separated from the data.
- The design of the study is determined before it begins.
- For the quantitative researcher, the reality is objective, exists separately from the researcher, and can be seen by anyone.
- Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.
Limitations of Quantitative Research
- Context: Quantitative experiments do not take place in natural settings. In addition, they do not allow participants to explain their choices or the meaning of the questions they may have for those participants (Carr, 1994).
- Researcher expertise: Poor knowledge of the application of statistical analysis may negatively affect analysis and subsequent interpretation (Black, 1999).
- Variability of data quantity: Large sample sizes are needed for more accurate analysis. Small-scale quantitative studies may be less reliable because of the low quantity of data (Denscombe, 2010). This also affects the ability to generalize study findings to wider populations.
- Confirmation bias: The researcher might miss observing phenomena because of focus on theory or hypothesis testing rather than on the theory of hypothesis generation.
Advantages of Quantitative Research
- Scientific objectivity: Quantitative data can be interpreted with statistical analysis, and since statistics are based on the principles of mathematics, the quantitative approach is viewed as scientifically objective and rational (Carr, 1994; Denscombe, 2010).
- Useful for testing and validating already constructed theories.
- Rapid analysis: Sophisticated software removes much of the need for prolonged data analysis, especially with large volumes of data involved (Antonius, 2003).
- Replication: Quantitative data is based on measured values and can be checked by others because numerical data is less open to ambiguities of interpretation.
- Hypotheses can also be tested because of statistical analysis (Antonius, 2003).
Antonius, R. (2003). Interpreting quantitative data with SPSS . Sage.
Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics . Sage.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3, 77–101.
Carr, L. T. (1994). The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research : what method for nursing? Journal of advanced nursing, 20(4) , 716-721.
Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research. McGraw Hill.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln. Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications Inc.
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4) , 364.
Minichiello, V. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Longman Cheshire.
Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage
Further Information
- Mixed methods research
- Designing qualitative research
- Methods of data collection and analysis
- Introduction to quantitative and qualitative research
- Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
- Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
- Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach
- Using the framework method for the analysis of
- Qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
- Content Analysis
- Grounded Theory
- Thematic Analysis
![Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis 5 Print Friendly, PDF & Email](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/three-icons-with-text-light-blue.jpg)
![what is qualitative type of research U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Perspect Clin Res
- v.14(1); Jan-Mar 2023
- PMC10003579
Introduction to qualitative research methods – Part I
Shagufta bhangu.
Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Fabien Provost
Carlo caduff.
Qualitative research methods are widely used in the social sciences and the humanities, but they can also complement quantitative approaches used in clinical research. In this article, we discuss the key features and contributions of qualitative research methods.
INTRODUCTION
Qualitative research methods refer to techniques of investigation that rely on nonstatistical and nonnumerical methods of data collection, analysis, and evidence production. Qualitative research techniques provide a lens for learning about nonquantifiable phenomena such as people's experiences, languages, histories, and cultures. In this article, we describe the strengths and role of qualitative research methods and how these can be employed in clinical research.
Although frequently employed in the social sciences and humanities, qualitative research methods can complement clinical research. These techniques can contribute to a better understanding of the social, cultural, political, and economic dimensions of health and illness. Social scientists and scholars in the humanities rely on a wide range of methods, including interviews, surveys, participant observation, focus groups, oral history, and archival research to examine both structural conditions and lived experience [ Figure 1 ]. Such research can not only provide robust and reliable data but can also humanize and add richness to our understanding of the ways in which people in different parts of the world perceive and experience illness and how they interact with medical institutions, systems, and therapeutics.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is PCR-14-39-g001.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is PCR-14-39-g001.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003579/bin/PCR-14-39-g001.jpg)
Examples of qualitative research techniques
Qualitative research methods should not be seen as tools that can be applied independently of theory. It is important for these tools to be based on more than just method. In their research, social scientists and scholars in the humanities emphasize social theory. Departing from a reductionist psychological model of individual behavior that often blames people for their illness, social theory focuses on relations – disease happens not simply in people but between people. This type of theoretically informed and empirically grounded research thus examines not just patients but interactions between a wide range of actors (e.g., patients, family members, friends, neighbors, local politicians, medical practitioners at all levels, and from many systems of medicine, researchers, policymakers) to give voice to the lived experiences, motivations, and constraints of all those who are touched by disease.
PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS
In identifying the factors that contribute to the occurrence and persistence of a phenomenon, it is paramount that we begin by asking the question: what do we know about this reality? How have we come to know this reality? These two processes, which we can refer to as the “what” question and the “how” question, are the two that all scientists (natural and social) grapple with in their research. We refer to these as the ontological and epistemological questions a research study must address. Together, they help us create a suitable methodology for any research study[ 1 ] [ Figure 2 ]. Therefore, as with quantitative methods, there must be a justifiable and logical method for understanding the world even for qualitative methods. By engaging with these two dimensions, the ontological and the epistemological, we open a path for learning that moves away from commonsensical understandings of the world, and the perpetuation of stereotypes and toward robust scientific knowledge production.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is PCR-14-39-g002.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is PCR-14-39-g002.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003579/bin/PCR-14-39-g002.jpg)
Developing a research methodology
Every discipline has a distinct research philosophy and way of viewing the world and conducting research. Philosophers and historians of science have extensively studied how these divisions and specializations have emerged over centuries.[ 1 , 2 , 3 ] The most important distinction between quantitative and qualitative research techniques lies in the nature of the data they study and analyze. While the former focus on statistical, numerical, and quantitative aspects of phenomena and employ the same in data collection and analysis, qualitative techniques focus on humanistic, descriptive, and qualitative aspects of phenomena.[ 4 ]
For the findings of any research study to be reliable, they must employ the appropriate research techniques that are uniquely tailored to the phenomena under investigation. To do so, researchers must choose techniques based on their specific research questions and understand the strengths and limitations of the different tools available to them. Since clinical work lies at the intersection of both natural and social phenomena, it means that it must study both: biological and physiological phenomena (natural, quantitative, and objective phenomena) and behavioral and cultural phenomena (social, qualitative, and subjective phenomena). Therefore, clinical researchers can gain from both sets of techniques in their efforts to produce medical knowledge and bring forth scientifically informed change.
KEY FEATURES AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS
In this section, we discuss the key features and contributions of qualitative research methods [ Figure 3 ]. We describe the specific strengths and limitations of these techniques and discuss how they can be deployed in scientific investigations.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is PCR-14-39-g003.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is PCR-14-39-g003.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003579/bin/PCR-14-39-g003.jpg)
Key features of qualitative research methods
One of the most important contributions of qualitative research methods is that they provide rigorous, theoretically sound, and rational techniques for the analysis of subjective, nebulous, and difficult-to-pin-down phenomena. We are aware, for example, of the role that social factors play in health care but find it hard to qualify and quantify these in our research studies. Often, we find researchers basing their arguments on “common sense,” developing research studies based on assumptions about the people that are studied. Such commonsensical assumptions are perhaps among the greatest impediments to knowledge production. For example, in trying to understand stigma, surveys often make assumptions about its reasons and frequently associate it with vague and general common sense notions of “fear” and “lack of information.” While these may be at work, to make such assumptions based on commonsensical understandings, and without conducting research inhibit us from exploring the multiple social factors that are at work under the guise of stigma.
In unpacking commonsensical understandings and researching experiences, relationships, and other phenomena, qualitative researchers are assisted by their methodological commitment to open-ended research. By open-ended research, we mean that these techniques take on an unbiased and exploratory approach in which learnings from the field and from research participants, are recorded and analyzed to learn about the world.[ 5 ] This orientation is made possible by qualitative research techniques that are particularly effective in learning about specific social, cultural, economic, and political milieus.
Second, qualitative research methods equip us in studying complex phenomena. Qualitative research methods provide scientific tools for exploring and identifying the numerous contributing factors to an occurrence. Rather than establishing one or the other factor as more important, qualitative methods are open-ended, inductive (ground-up), and empirical. They allow us to understand the object of our analysis from multiple vantage points and in its dispersion and caution against predetermined notions of the object of inquiry. They encourage researchers instead to discover a reality that is not yet given, fixed, and predetermined by the methods that are used and the hypotheses that underlie the study.
Once the multiple factors at work in a phenomenon have been identified, we can employ quantitative techniques and embark on processes of measurement, establish patterns and regularities, and analyze the causal and correlated factors at work through statistical techniques. For example, a doctor may observe that there is a high patient drop-out in treatment. Before carrying out a study which relies on quantitative techniques, qualitative research methods such as conversation analysis, interviews, surveys, or even focus group discussions may prove more effective in learning about all the factors that are contributing to patient default. After identifying the multiple, intersecting factors, quantitative techniques can be deployed to measure each of these factors through techniques such as correlational or regression analyses. Here, the use of quantitative techniques without identifying the diverse factors influencing patient decisions would be premature. Qualitative techniques thus have a key role to play in investigations of complex realities and in conducting rich exploratory studies while embracing rigorous and philosophically grounded methodologies.
Third, apart from subjective, nebulous, and complex phenomena, qualitative research techniques are also effective in making sense of irrational, illogical, and emotional phenomena. These play an important role in understanding logics at work among patients, their families, and societies. Qualitative research techniques are aided by their ability to shift focus away from the individual as a unit of analysis to the larger social, cultural, political, economic, and structural forces at work in health. As health-care practitioners and researchers focused on biological, physiological, disease and therapeutic processes, sociocultural, political, and economic conditions are often peripheral or ignored in day-to-day clinical work. However, it is within these latter processes that both health-care practices and patient lives are entrenched. Qualitative researchers are particularly adept at identifying the structural conditions such as the social, cultural, political, local, and economic conditions which contribute to health care and experiences of disease and illness.
For example, the decision to delay treatment by a patient may be understood as an irrational choice impacting his/her chances of survival, but the same may be a result of the patient treating their child's education as a financial priority over his/her own health. While this appears as an “emotional” choice, qualitative researchers try to understand the social and cultural factors that structure, inform, and justify such choices. Rather than assuming that it is an irrational choice, qualitative researchers try to understand the norms and logical grounds on which the patient is making this decision. By foregrounding such logics, stories, fears, and desires, qualitative research expands our analytic precision in learning about complex social worlds, recognizing reasons for medical successes and failures, and interrogating our assumptions about human behavior. These in turn can prove useful in arriving at conclusive, actionable findings which can inform institutional and public health policies and have a very important role to play in any change and transformation we may wish to bring to the societies in which we work.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest.
There are no conflicts of interest.
![what is qualitative type of research U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Email citation, add to collections.
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed, qualitative study, affiliations.
- 1 University of Nebraska Medical Center
- 2 GDB Research and Statistical Consulting
- 3 GDB Research and Statistical Consulting/McLaren Macomb Hospital
- PMID: 29262162
- Bookshelf ID: NBK470395
Qualitative research is a type of research that explores and provides deeper insights into real-world problems. Instead of collecting numerical data points or intervening or introducing treatments just like in quantitative research, qualitative research helps generate hypothenar to further investigate and understand quantitative data. Qualitative research gathers participants' experiences, perceptions, and behavior. It answers the hows and whys instead of how many or how much. It could be structured as a standalone study, purely relying on qualitative data, or part of mixed-methods research that combines qualitative and quantitative data. This review introduces the readers to some basic concepts, definitions, terminology, and applications of qualitative research.
Qualitative research, at its core, asks open-ended questions whose answers are not easily put into numbers, such as "how" and "why." Due to the open-ended nature of the research questions, qualitative research design is often not linear like quantitative design. One of the strengths of qualitative research is its ability to explain processes and patterns of human behavior that can be difficult to quantify. Phenomena such as experiences, attitudes, and behaviors can be complex to capture accurately and quantitatively. In contrast, a qualitative approach allows participants themselves to explain how, why, or what they were thinking, feeling, and experiencing at a particular time or during an event of interest. Quantifying qualitative data certainly is possible, but at its core, qualitative data is looking for themes and patterns that can be difficult to quantify, and it is essential to ensure that the context and narrative of qualitative work are not lost by trying to quantify something that is not meant to be quantified.
However, while qualitative research is sometimes placed in opposition to quantitative research, where they are necessarily opposites and therefore "compete" against each other and the philosophical paradigms associated with each other, qualitative and quantitative work are neither necessarily opposites, nor are they incompatible. While qualitative and quantitative approaches are different, they are not necessarily opposites and certainly not mutually exclusive. For instance, qualitative research can help expand and deepen understanding of data or results obtained from quantitative analysis. For example, say a quantitative analysis has determined a correlation between length of stay and level of patient satisfaction, but why does this correlation exist? This dual-focus scenario shows one way in which qualitative and quantitative research could be integrated.
Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.
PubMed Disclaimer
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: Steven Tenny declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Janelle Brannan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Grace Brannan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
- Introduction
- Issues of Concern
- Clinical Significance
- Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
- Review Questions
Similar articles
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
- Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012). Foffi G, Pastore A, Piazza F, Temussi PA. Foffi G, et al. Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Phys Biol. 2013. PMID: 23912807
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
- Invited review: Qualitative research in dairy science-A narrative review. Ritter C, Koralesky KE, Saraceni J, Roche S, Vaarst M, Kelton D. Ritter C, et al. J Dairy Sci. 2023 Sep;106(9):5880-5895. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-23125. Epub 2023 Jul 18. J Dairy Sci. 2023. PMID: 37474366 Review.
- Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Husk K, Lovell R, Cooper C, Stahl-Timmins W, Garside R. Husk K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27207731 Free PMC article. Review.
- Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):271-273. - PMC - PubMed
- Cleland JA. The qualitative orientation in medical education research. Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Jun;29(2):61-71. - PMC - PubMed
- Foley G, Timonen V. Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences. Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50(4):1195-210. - PMC - PubMed
- Devers KJ. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88. - PMC - PubMed
- Huston P, Rowan M. Qualitative studies. Their role in medical research. Can Fam Physician. 1998 Nov;44:2453-8. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
Related information
- Cited in Books
LinkOut - more resources
Full text sources.
- NCBI Bookshelf
![what is qualitative type of research book cover photo](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/bookshelf/thumbs/th-statpearls.png)
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
![what is qualitative type of research Forage](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/navy-wide-logo-2x-300x90-1-120x36.png)
Qualitative Research Definition
Qualitative research methods and examples, advantages and disadvantages of qualitative approaches, qualitative vs. quantitative research, showing qualitative research skills on resumes, what is qualitative research methods and examples.
![what is qualitative type of research McKayla Girardin](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/headshot-48x48.jpeg)
- Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
- Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
![what is qualitative type of research What Is Qualitative Research? Examples and methods](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/what-is-qualitative-research-1-1024x768.jpg)
Forage puts students first. Our blog articles are written independently by our editorial team. They have not been paid for or sponsored by our partners. See our full editorial guidelines .
![](http://blog10.website/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
Table of Contents
Qualitative research seeks to understand people’s experiences and perspectives by studying social organizations and human behavior. Data in qualitative studies focuses on people’s beliefs and emotional responses. Qualitative data is especially helpful when a company wants to know how customers feel about a product or service, such as in user experience (UX) design or marketing .
Researchers use qualitative approaches to “determine answers to research questions on human behavior and the cultural values that drive our thinking and behavior,” says Margaret J. King, director at The Center for Cultural Studies & Analysis in Philadelphia.
Data in qualitative research typically can’t be assessed mathematically — the data is not sets of numbers or quantifiable information. Rather, it’s collections of images, words, notes on behaviors, descriptions of emotions, and historical context. Data is collected through observations, interviews, surveys, focus groups, and secondary research.
However, a qualitative study needs a “clear research question at its base,” notes King, and the research needs to be “observed, categorized, compared, and evaluated (along a scale or by a typology chart) by reference to a baseline in order to determine an outcome with value as new and reliable information.”
![what is qualitative type of research What's the difference: Data science vs. software engineering?](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/data-science-vs-software-engineering-150x105.jpg)
Quantium Data Analytics
Explore the power of data and its ability to power breakthrough possibilities for individuals, organisations and societies with this free job simulation from Quantium.
Avg. Time: 4 to 5 hours
Skills you’ll build: Data validation, data visualisation, data wrangling, programming, data analysis, commercial thinking, statistical testing, presentation skills
Who Uses Qualitative Research?
Researchers in social sciences and humanities often use qualitative research methods, especially in specific areas of study like anthropology, history, education, and sociology.
Qualitative methods are also applicable in business, technology , and marketing spaces. For example, product managers use qualitative research to understand how target audiences respond to their products. They may use focus groups to gain insights from potential customers on product prototypes and improvements or surveys from existing customers to understand what changes users want to see.
Other careers that may involve qualitative research include:
- Marketing analyst
- UX and UI analyst
- Market researcher
- Statistician
- Business analyst
- Data analyst
- Research assistant
- Claims investigator
![what is qualitative type of research Working at Electronic Arts](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/electronic-arts-150x100.jpg)
Electronic Arts Product Management
Learn how product managers leverage qualitative and other types of research to build and improve products in this free job simulation from EA.
Avg. Time: 1 to 2 hours
Skills you’ll build: Critical thinking, problem solving, performance metrics, written communication, project planning
Good research begins with a question, and this question informs the approach used by qualitative researchers.
Grounded Theory
Grounded theory is an inductive approach to theory development. In many forms of research, you begin with a hypothesis and then test it to see if you’re correct. In grounded theory, though, you go in without any assumptions and rely on the data you collect to form theories. You start with an open question about a phenomenon you are studying and collect and analyze data until you can form a fully-fledged theory from the information.
Example: A company wants to improve its brand and marketing strategies. The company performs a grounded theory approach to solving this problem by conducting interviews and surveys with past, current, and prospective customers. The information gathered from these methods helps the company understand what type of branding and marketing their customer-base likes and dislikes, allowing the team to inductively craft a new brand and marketing strategy from the data.
Action Research
Action research is one part study and one part problem-solving . Through action research, analysts investigate a problem or weakness and develop practical solutions. The process of action research is cyclical —- researchers assess solutions for efficiency and effectiveness, and create further solutions to correct any issues found.
Example: A manager notices her employees struggle to cooperate on group projects. She carefully reviews how team members interact with each other and asks them all to respond to a survey about communication. Through the survey and study, she finds that guidelines for group projects are unclear. After changing the guidelines, she reviews her team again to see if there are any changes to their behavior.
>>MORE: Explore how action research helps consultants serve clients with Accenture’s Client Research and Problem Identification job simulation .
Phenomenological Research
Phenomenological research investigates a phenomenon in depth, looking at people’s experiences and understanding of the situation. This sort of study is primarily descriptive and seeks to broaden understanding around a specific incident and the people involved. Researchers in phenomenological studies must be careful to set aside any biases or assumptions because the information used should be entirely from the subjects themselves.
Example : A researcher wants to better understand the lived experience of college students with jobs. The purpose of this research is to gain insights into the pressures of college students who balance studying and working at the same time. The researcher conducts a series of interviews with several college students, learning about their past and current situations. Through the first few interviews, the researcher builds a relationship with the students. Later discussions are more targeted, with questions prompting the students to discuss their emotions surrounding both work and school and the difficulties and benefits arising from their situation. The researcher then analyzes these interviews, and identifies shared themes to contextualize the experiences of the students.
![what is qualitative type of research](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/general-electric-150x100.jpg)
GE Aerospace Human Resources
Learn the research and conflict resolution skills necessary for a career in human resources in this free job simulation from GE.
Avg. Time: 3 to 4 hours
Skills you’ll build: Feedback giving, communication skills, empowering with insights, basics of lean, process mapping, continuous improvement tools, dataset handling in Excel
Ethnography
Ethnography is an immersive study of a particular culture or community. Through ethnographic research, analysts aim to learn about a group’s conventions, social dynamics, and cultural norms. Some researchers use active observation methods, finding ways to integrate themselves into the culture as much as possible. Others use passive observation, watching closely from the outside but not fully immersing themselves.
Example: A company hires an external researcher to learn what their company’s culture is actually like. The researcher studies the social dynamics of the employees and may even look at how these employees interact with clients and with each other outside of the office. The goal is to deliver a comprehensive report of the company’s culture and the social dynamics of its employees.
Case Studies
A case study is a type of in-depth analysis of a situation. Case studies can focus on an organization, belief system, event, person, or action. The goal of a case study is to understand the phenomenon and put it in a real-world context. Case studies are also commonly used in marketing and sales to highlight the benefits of a company’s products or services.
Example: A business performs a case study of its competitors’ strategies. This case study aims to show why the company should adopt a specific business strategy. The study looks at each competitor’s business structure, marketing campaigns, product offerings, and historical growth trends. Then, using this data on other businesses, the researcher can theorize how that strategy would benefit their company.
>>MORE: Learn how companies use case study interviews to assess candidates’ research and problem-solving skills.
Qualitative research methods are great for generating new ideas. The exploratory nature of qualitative research means uncovering unexpected information, which often leads to new theories and further research topics. Additionally, qualitative findings feel meaningful. These studies focus on people, emotions, and societies and may feel closer to their communities than quantitative research that relies on more mathematical and logical data.
However, qualitative research can be unreliable at times. It’s difficult to replicate qualitative studies since people’s opinions and emotions can change quickly. For example, a focus group has a lot of variables that can affect the outcome, and that same group, asked the same questions a year later, may have entirely different responses. The data collection can also be difficult and time-consuming with qualitative research. Ultimately, interviewing people, reviewing surveys, and understanding and explaining human emotions can be incredibly complex.
Find your career fit
See what career path is right for you with our free career quiz!
While qualitative research deals with data that isn’t easily manipulated by mathematics, quantitative research almost exclusively involves numbers and numerical data. Quantitative studies aim to find concrete details, like units of time, percentages, or statistics.
Besides the types of data used, a core difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the idea of control and replication.
“Qualitative is less subject to control (as in lab studies) and, therefore, less statistically measurable than quantitative approaches,” says King.
One person’s interview about a specific topic can have completely different responses than every other person’s interview since there are so many variables in qualitative research. On the other hand, quantitative studies can often be replicated. For instance, when testing the effects of a new medication, quantifiable data, like blood test results, can be repeated. Qualitative data, though, like how people feel about the medication, may differ from person to person and from moment to moment.
![what is qualitative type of research J.P.Morgan bank corporation headquarters glass building concept. JP Morgan banking company symbol on front facade 3d illustration.](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/jpmorgan-internships-150x93.jpg)
JPMorgan Quantitative Research
Discover how bankers use quantitative methods to analyze businesses and industry trends with this free job simulation.
Avg. Time: 6 to 7 hours
Skills you’ll build: Programming, data analysis, Python, critical thinking, statistics, dynamic programming
You can show your experience with qualitative research on your resume in your skills or work experience sections and your cover letter .
- In your skills section , you can list types of qualitative research you are skilled at, like conducting interviews, performing grounded theory research, or crafting case studies.
- In your work or internship experience descriptions , you can highlight specific examples, like talking about a time you used action research to solve a complex issue at your last job.
- In your cover letter , you can discuss in-depth qualitative research projects you’ve completed. For instance, say you spent a summer conducting ethnographic research or a whole semester running focus groups to get feedback on a product. You can talk about these experiences in your cover letter and note how these skills make you a great fit for the job.
Grow your skills and explore your career options with Forage’s free job simulations .
Image credit: Canva
![what is qualitative type of research McKayla Girardin](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/headshot-96x96.jpeg)
Related Posts
6 negotiation skills to level up your work life, how to build conflict resolution skills: case studies and examples, what is github uses and getting started, upskill with forage.
![what is qualitative type of research Bloomberg logo through magnifying glass](https://www.theforage.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/working-at-bloomberg.jpg)
Top companies are hiring now!
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://cdn.harappa.education/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/19121117/Pasted-Graphic-17.png)
Types Of Qualitative Research Designs And Methods
Qualitative research design comes in many forms. Understanding what qualitative research is and the various methods that fall under its…
![Types Of Qualitative Methods Types Of Qualitative Research Designs](https://cdn.harappa.education/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/28132251/3-4.jpg)
Qualitative research design comes in many forms. Understanding what qualitative research is and the various methods that fall under its umbrella can help determine which method or design to use. Various techniques can achieve results, depending on the subject of study.
Types of qualitative research to explore social behavior or understand interactions within specific contexts include interviews, focus groups, observations and surveys. These identify concepts and relationships that aren’t easily observed through quantitative methods. Figuring out what to explore through qualitative research is the first step in picking the right study design.
Let’s look at the most common types of qualitative methods.
What Is Qualitative Research Design?
Types of qualitative research designs, how are qualitative answers analyzed, qualitative research design in business.
There are several types of qualitative research. The term refers to in-depth, exploratory studies that discover what people think, how they behave and the reasons behind their behavior. The qualitative researcher believes that to best understand human behavior, they need to know the context in which people are acting and making decisions.
Let’s define some basic terms.
Qualitative Method
A group of techniques that allow the researcher to gather information from participants to learn about their experiences, behaviors or beliefs. The types of qualitative research methods used in a specific study should be chosen as dictated by the data being gathered. For instance, to study how employers rate the skills of the engineering students they hired, qualitative research would be appropriate.
Quantitative Method
A group of techniques that allows the researcher to gather information from participants to measure variables. The data is numerical in nature. For instance, quantitative research can be used to study how many engineering students enroll in an MBA program.
Research Design
A plan or outline of how the researcher will proceed with the proposed research project. This defines the sample, the scope of work, the goals and objectives. It may also lay out a hypothesis to be tested. Research design could also combine qualitative and quantitative techniques.
Both qualitative and quantitative research are significant. Depending on the subject and the goals of the study, researchers choose one or the other or a combination of the two. This is all part of the qualitative research design process.
Before we look at some different types of qualitative research, it’s important to note that there’s no one correct approach to qualitative research design. No matter what the type of study, it’s important to carefully consider the design to ensure the method is suitable to the research question. Here are the types of qualitative research methods to choose from:
Cluster Sampling
This technique involves selecting participants from specific locations or teams (clusters). A researcher may set out to observe, interview, or create a focus group with participants linked by location, organization or some other commonality. For example, the researcher might select the top five teams that produce an organization’s finest work. The same can be done by looking at locations (stores in a geographic region). The benefit of this design is that it’s efficient in collecting opinions from specific working groups or areas. However, this limits the sample size to only those people who work within the cluster.
Random Sampling
This design involves randomly assigning participants into groups based on a set of variables (location, gender, race, occupation). In this design, each participant is assigned an equal chance of being selected into a particular group. For example, if the researcher wants to study how students from different colleges differ from one another in terms of workplace habits and friendships, a random sample could be chosen from the student population at these colleges. The purpose of this design is to create a more even distribution of participants across all groups. The researcher will need to choose which groups to include in the study.
Focus Groups
A focus group is a small group that meets to discuss specific issues. Participants are usually recruited randomly, although sometimes they might be recruited because of personal relationships with each other or because they represent part of a certain demographic (age, location). Focus groups are one of the most popular styles of qualitative research because they allow for individual views and opinions to be shared without introducing bias. Researchers gather data through face-to-face conversation or recorded observation.
Observation
This technique involves observing the interaction patterns in a particular situation. Researchers collect data by closely watching the behaviors of others. This method can only be used in certain settings, such as in the workplace or homes.
An interview is an open-ended conversation between a researcher and a participant in which the researcher asks predetermined questions. Successful interviews require careful preparation to ensure that participants are able to give accurate answers. This method allows researchers to collect specific information about their research topic, and participants are more likely to be honest when telling their stories. However, there’s no way to control the number of unique answers, and certain participants may feel uncomfortable sharing their personal details with a stranger.
A survey is a questionnaire used to gather information from a pool of people to get a large sample of responses. This study design allows researchers to collect more data than they would with individual interviews and observations. Depending on the nature of the survey, it may also not require participants to disclose sensitive information or details. On the flip side, it’s time-consuming and may not yield the answers researchers were looking for. It’s also difficult to collect and analyze answers from larger groups.
A large study can combine several of these methods. For instance, it can involve a survey to better understand which kind of organic produce consumers are looking for. It may also include questions on the frequency of such purchases—a numerical data point—alongside their views on the legitimacy of the organic tag, which is an open-ended qualitative question.
Knowledge of the types of qualitative research designs will help you achieve the results you desire.
With quantitative research, analysis of results is fairly straightforward. But, the nature of qualitative research design is such that turning the information collected into usable data can be a challenge. To do this, researchers have to code the non-numerical data for comparison and analysis.
The researcher goes through all their notes and recordings and codes them using a predetermined scheme. Codes are created by ‘stripping out’ words or phrases that seem to answer the questions posed. The researcher will need to decide which categories to code for. Sometimes this process can be time-consuming and difficult to do during the first few passes through the data. So, it’s a good idea to start off by coding a small amount of the data and conducting a thematic analysis to get a better understanding of how to proceed.
The data collected must be organized and analyzed to answer the research questions. There are three approaches to analyzing the data: exploratory, confirmatory and descriptive.
Explanatory Data Analysis
This approach involves looking for relationships within the data to make sense of it. This design can be useful if the research question is ambiguous or open-ended. Exploratory analysis is very flexible and can be used in a number of settings. But, it generally looks at the relationship between variables while the researcher is working with the data.
Confirmatory Data Analysis
This design is used when there’s a hypothesis or theory to be tested. Confirmatory research seeks to test how well past findings apply to new observations by comparing them to statistical tests that quantify relationships between variables. It can also use prior research findings to predict new results.
Descriptive Data Analysis
In this design, the researcher will describe patterns that can be observed from the data. The researcher will take raw data and interpret it with an eye for patterns to formulate a theory that can eventually be tested with quantitative data. The qualitative design is ideal for exploring events that can’t be observed (such as people’s thoughts) or when a process is being evaluated.
With careful planning and insightful analysis, qualitative research is a versatile and useful tool in business, public policy and social studies. In the workplace, managers can use it to understand markets and consumers better or to study the health of an organization.
Businesses conduct qualitative research for many reasons. Harappa’s Thinking Critically course prepares professionals to use such data to understand their work better. Driven by experienced faculty with real-world experience, the course equips employees on a growth trajectory with frameworks and skills to use their reasoning abilities to build better arguments. It’s possible to build more effective teams. Find out how with Harappa.
Explore Harappa Diaries to learn more about topics such as What is Qualitative Research , Quantitative Vs Qualitative Research , Examples of Phenomenological Research and Tips For Studying Online to upgrade your knowledge and skills.
![Thriversitybannersidenav Thriversitybannersidenav](https://cdn.harappa.education/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/21112434/Thriversitybannersidenav.png)
- Login to Survey Tool Review Center
What Is Qualitative Research?
Summary: qualitative research is one type of exploratory market research methodology whose primary outcome is to develop an understanding, not recommend a final course of action. it important to know its strengths and weaknesses to harness its power..
9 minutes to read. By author Michaela Mora on February 23, 2022 Topics: Market Research , Qualitative Research
![what is qualitative type of research What is Qualitative Research](https://www.relevantinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/What-is-Qualitative-Research.jpg)
Qualitative research is one type of exploratory market research methodology based on semi-structured or unstructured data collection and a small sample of participants.
The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research is similar to the difference between exploratory and conclusive research.
In Exploratory research, we define our information needs somewhat loosely. The research process is flexible, and the participant samples are small and nonrepresentative. The findings are tentative, requiring further exploratory or conclusive research.
On the other hand, Conclusive research is typically more formal and structured, tends to be based on large, representative samples, and is subject to quantitative analysis.
This doesn’t mean that all quantitative research is conclusive. We also use many quantitative studies for exploratory purposes.
Reasons for Using Qualitative Research
At its core, qualitative research is intended to understand underlying reasons and motivations that drive behaviors of interest (e.g., awareness, consideration, purchase, use) .
Under this broad goal, qualitative research is often undertaken to:
- Uncover and formulate a problem or define a problem more precisely
- Gain insights to develop research approaches
- Establish research priorities
- Develop hypotheses about key variables and relationships that need further exploration
- Understand the language used to discuss topics and support survey design
- Explain findings from quantitative research
Qualitative Research Main Advantage
Qualitative research is really powerful when it is impossible or undesirable to use structured forms to obtain information. This may be due to:
- Unwillingness to answer questions : Questions that invade people’s privacy can lead to feelings of embarrassment or hurt. The instinct to protect one’s self-image, ego, or status is a powerful motivator behind the refusal to answer specific direct questions.
- Inability to answer questions : Questions that require memory retrieval related to behaviors, feelings, and events that happened long ago or sporadically or caused an emotional upheaval that people are trying to forget are often hard to remember and produce inaccurate answers. They can also be subject to desirability bias (known socially acceptable answers) and saliency bias (attention to the more noticeable elements of an experience).
There are many qualitative research techniques for asking questions and observing behaviors that excel at unearthing the underlying drivers behind behavioral patterns and bringing them to the surface when people cannot articulate them in structured survey questions.
Qualitative Research Methods
The research methods used in primary qualitative research can be classified as either direct or indirect depending on whether the participants know the study’s true purpose.
Direct Methods
In these approaches, the project’s objectives are disclosed to participants, or it may be evident from the questions we ask them. These approaches include Focus Groups and In-Depth-Interviews (IDIs).
Focus Group
This is an interview with a small group of respondents (4 to 10), online or in-person, conducted by a trained moderator using a discussion guide with various levels of structure. This interviewing technique has its origin in psychotherapy and was adapted to market research since the 1940s. For many decades, this technique was synonymous with qualitative research.
The primary purpose of a Focus Group is to gain insights by listening to a group of people talk about topics of interest to the research. The value of focus groups lies in the potential unexpected findings we can discover through a group discussion under the guidance of an experienced moderator .
Focus groups have their place in the research toolbox. Like any other research method, they have advantages and disadvantages. As a result., they are not a good fit for every research need. For more on the advantages and disadvantages of focus groups, check the article When Using Focus Groups Makes Sense .
We can conduct Focus Groups in person, via online chat, or video calls.
In-Depth Interviews (IDIs)
This is another interview research technique we use to obtain information in an unstructured and direct way, but unlike focus groups, we conduct them one-on-one.
We can conduct IDIs in person, over the phone, via online chat, or through video calls.
In-Depth Interviews, a highly skilled interviewer (preferably) ask probing questions to a single respondent to uncover underlying motivations, beliefs, attitudes, and feelings on the topics of interest.
This interviewing technique was also adapted from the psychotherapy toolbox by market researchers. UX research practitioners have also adopted it under new names such as “User Interviews” to understand the behaviors and needs of digital product users. Another increasingly popular label for IDIs in the UX community is “Jobs-to-Be-Done” (JTBD) interviews, which try to go deeper into understanding user needs.
Moderated and Unmoderated Usability Tests using the Think-Out-Loud approach are also adaptations of In-Depth Interviews trying to elicit mental models and expectations behind user behaviors during their interactions with digital products.
In-Depth Interviews can uncover a greater depth of insights than focus groups when interviewers use probing techniques to go beyond apparent answers. They also can be attributed to the individual, which can be more challenging in group discussions. The risk of group influence is also eliminated in IDIs.
Indirect Methods
Indirect qualitative research techniques don’t disclose the true purpose of the research project. In this category, we find projective techniques. These are every more unstructured, indirect forms of asking questions that encourage respondents to “project” their underlying motivations, beliefs, attitudes, or feelings regarding issues we are researching. These include:
- Association : Respondents respond with the first thing that comes to mind (e.g., word association) when presented with a stimulus (e.g., words, pictures, etc.)
- Completion : Participants complete an incomplete stimulus situation (e.g., a sentence, a story, etc.)
- Construction : Participants construct a response in the format of stories, dialogues, pictures, drawings.
- Expressive : Participants describe the feelings or attitudes of someone in situations described verbally or through visual elements. These can be done through role-playing or explaining the problem from a third-person’s perspective.
These techniques are often embedded as exercises in Focus Group and IDI sessions, in-person or online.
![what is qualitative type of research Qualitative Research Techniques](https://www.relevantinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Qualitative-Research-Techniques-300x209.jpg)
Hybrid Qualitative Research
Since the 2010s, qualitative research has evolved significantly, thanks to technology. We can combine several qualitative methods and integrate them with quantitative approaches seamlessly in the same study to capture different types of data and perspectives.
Hybrid approaches initially started with the opportunity to do a few chat-based IDIs with survey participants on the fly. They kept evolving to do large-scale AI, chat-based focus groups, with platforms like Remesh.ai.
During this time of evolution, Online Bulletin Board Discussions also became popular.
Online Bulletin Board Discussions
These are asynchronous online focus group discussions with many participants that can go for days and weeks.
In this approach, depending on the platform, we can ask many types of questions (open-ended, survey questions, video questions, picture-based questions, etc.).
Activities may include diaries and journaling with an ethnographic quality combined with group discussions. Questions, activities, and discussions are managed by a skilled group moderator guided by the study objectives.
This methodology can be a hybrid of direct and indirect techniques depending on how we ask the questions and the included activities.
Running these multiple-day discussions is a time-consuming endeavor during the project’s planning, execution, and analysis phases. They yield rich and large amounts of data even with a few participants.
Online Community Research
Online communities have been the next evolutionary step from online bulletin board discussions. These have become a way to conduct ongoing research faster and cheaper, assuming the research volume is large enough to justify the cost. Establishing and maintaining an online research community is resource-intensive, in time and money.
These communities include a group of customers who want to stay in touch with a brand and are willing to participate in their ongoing studies. Their sizes can range from a few hundred to thousands of members.
While you can do it yourself, it is a lot of work. For many brands, it is better to use research suppliers that can provide the platform, recruitment services, and community management services.
Community members are invited to participate in surveys, focus groups, IDIs, diary studies, etc., to provide feedback on product design, customer experience, brand perceptions, product development , etc.
Research communities are great to ask follow-up questions to get more details. Their answers can be connected to their demographic profile information, providing context to those answers. Most importantly, we can see what they want to talk about. Even when there are many moderator-generated questions, most of the conversations are generated by members.
At the same time, despite the ability to combine quantitative and qualitative data collection in a research community, research communities may not be as representative of the population of interest as some balanced sampling plans used for surveys outside the community.
Research communities typically don’t include non-customers and mostly give voice to the loudest members of the brand’s customer base.
Digital Ethnography
The growing interest in customer experience and user experience has led to a revival of ethnographic research methods. Observation has always been part of the protocol in many qualitative research studies interested in understanding why and how people buy products and services and use them in their natural environments.
In-home product use and “shop-along” studies are the most common ethnography approaches used by market researchers, in which we combine observation and interviewing. In UX research, these on-site studies are known as Contextual Inquiry. However, these studies can be prohibitively expensive when done in person.
Again, thanks to technology, we can now “employ” participants as self-ethnographers to conduct digital ethnography.
Digital ethnography is observation research enabled by online tools rather than by in-person observation. It is a convenient way for participants to share how they interact with products and services in their natural environment. For more information on this approach, check the article Digital Ethnography .
How to Use Qualitative Research
Overall, qualitative research has grown in popularity among research users, both in market research and UX research . The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of its digital modalities when all in-person research came to a halt.
Regardless of the modality, the primary outcome of qualitative research is to develop an understanding, not recommend a final course of action.
Why? It is difficult to project its results to a larger population affected by a particular course of action due to the unstructured nature of the data it produces and the inability to work with representative samples resulting from small sample sizes and sample recruitment methods it uses.
Moreover, many qualitative research techniques are affected by two key disadvantages:
- Skilled interviewers and moderators, often more expensive, are needed to do them right. The quality of the results depends heavily on the moderators’ skills.
- The unstructured nature of the data resulting from these techniques makes the analysis susceptible to biases from the analysts.
In short, it is a sound principle in market research to view qualitative and quantitative research as complementary rather than competition.
In our practice, we often recommend using qualitative research in combination with quantitative research if budget and timelines allow it. At a minimum, when qualitative research is considered, quantitative research should be used to validate qualitative research results if important go/no-go decisions will have a significant impact on the business.
Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach allows researchers to select fit-for-purpose methodologies to find the answers we need to solve the business problems at hand.
To learn more about the work of market researchers who specialize in qualitative research visit the Qualitative Research Consultant Association (QRCA) .
Related Articles
- What Is Market Research?
- Why Validation of Qualitative Research Is Needed
- What is Agile Product Development?
- How to Use Digital Ethnography to Understand Real Product Use
- The Opportunity of UX Research Webinar
- How to Leverage UX and Market Research To Understand Your Customers
- Secondary Research Advantages, Limitations, and Sources
- Why Your Business Needs Discovery Research
- Your Market Research Plan to Succeed As a Startup
- 4 Ways to Make Qualitative Research Faster, Easier & More Objective
- Customer Events Are Not Focus Groups
- The Best Way To Find Profitable New Product Ideas
- How To Use Social Media In Market Research
- Moderated or Unmoderated Usability Tests?
- Common Focus Group Mistakes
- When Using Focus Groups Makes Sense
- How To Research The Irrational Consumer
- Online Qualitative Research Techniques Review
- How to Use Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Product Development
- 12 Research Techniques to Solve Choice Overload
- Myths & Misunderstandings About UX – MR Realities Podcast
- Segmentation vs. Personas – What’s The Difference?
- How CX Research Can Help Product Managers
- UX Research Methods For User-Centric Design
- What is User Experience?
- 10 Guidelines For Testing Website Navigation
- 10 Cognitive Biases You Shouldn’t Ignore In Research
- Learning From Testing Website Design Ideas
Subscribe to our newsletter to get notified about future articles
Subscribe and don’t miss anything!
Recent Articles
- How AI Can Further Remove Researchers in Search of Productivity and Lower Costs
- Re: Design/Growth Podcast – Researching User Experiences for Business Growth
- Why You Need Positioning Concept Testing in New Product Development
- Why Conjoint Analysis Is Best for Price Research
- The Rise of UX
- Making the Case Against the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter
- How to Future-Proof Experience Management and Your Business
- How to Make Segmentation Research Actionable
- How To Integrate Market Research and UX Research for Desired Business Outcomes
Popular Articles
- Which Rating Scales Should I Use?
- What To Consider in Survey Design
- Step by Step Guide to the Market Research Process
- 6 Decisions To Make When Designing Product Concept Tests
- Write Winning Product Concepts To Get Accurate Results In Concept Tests
- Concept Testing for UX Researchers
- UX Research Geeks Podcast – Using Market Research for Better Context in UX
- A Researcher’s Path – Data Stories Leaders At Work Podcast
- How To Improve Racial and Gender Inclusion in Survey Design
![what is qualitative type of research GDPR](https://www.relevantinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/gdpr-logo-300x200.png)
- Privacy Overview
- Strictly Necessary Cookies
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
![what is qualitative type of research Qualitative & Quantitative Data](https://www.pickl.ai/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Qualitative-Quantitative-Data-800x500.jpg)
Understanding Qualitative and Quantitative Data
- 7 minute read
- August 22, 2024
![what is qualitative type of research Smith Alex](https://www.pickl.ai/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/avatar_user_26_1723028835-80x80.jpg)
Written by:
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://www.pickl.ai/wp-content/themes/pickl-new/images/verified-icon.png)
Smith Alex is a committed data enthusiast and an aspiring leader in the domain of data analytics. With a foundation in engineering and practical experience in the field of data science
Summary: This article delves into qualitative and quantitative data, defining each type and highlighting their key differences. It discusses when to use each data type, the benefits of integrating both, and the challenges researchers face. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effective research design and achieving comprehensive insights.
Introduction
In the realm of research and Data Analysis , two fundamental types of data play pivotal roles: qualitative and quantitative data. Understanding the distinctions between these two categories is essential for researchers, analysts, and decision-makers alike, as each type serves different purposes and is suited to various contexts.
This article will explore the definitions, characteristics, uses, and challenges associated with both qualitative and quantitative data, providing a comprehensive overview for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of data collection and analysis.
Read More: Exploring 5 Statistical Data Analysis Techniques with Real-World Examples
Defining Qualitative Data
Qualitative data is non-numerical in nature and is primarily concerned with understanding the qualities, characteristics, and attributes of a subject.
This type of data is descriptive and often involves collecting information through methods such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and open-ended survey questions. The goal of qualitative data is to gain insights into the underlying motivations, opinions, and experiences of individuals or groups.
Characteristics of Qualitative Data
- Descriptive : Qualitative data provides rich, detailed descriptions of phenomena, allowing researchers to capture the complexity of human experiences.
- Subjective : The interpretation of qualitative data can vary based on the researcher’s perspective, making it inherently subjective.
- Contextual : This type of data is often context-dependent, meaning that the insights gained can be influenced by the environment or situation in which the data was collected.
- Exploratory : Qualitative data is typically used in exploratory research to generate hypotheses or to understand phenomena that are not well understood.
Examples of Qualitative Data
- Interview transcripts that capture participants’ thoughts and feelings.
- Observational notes from field studies.
- Responses to open-ended questions in surveys.
- Personal narratives or case studies that illustrate individual experiences.
Defining Quantitative Data
Quantitative data, in contrast, is numerical and can be measured or counted. This type of data is often used to quantify variables and analyse relationships between them. Quantitative research typically employs statistical methods to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and make predictions based on numerical data.
Characteristics of Quantitative Data
- Objective : Quantitative data is generally considered more objective than qualitative data, as it relies on measurable values that can be statistically analysed.
- Structured : This type of data is often collected using structured methods such as surveys with closed-ended questions, experiments, or observational checklists.
- Generalizable : Because quantitative data is based on numerical values, findings can often be generalised to larger populations if the sample is representative.
- Statistical Analysis : Quantitative data lends itself to various statistical analyses , allowing researchers to draw conclusions based on numerical evidence.
Examples of Quantitative Data
- Age, height, and weight measurements.
- Survey results with numerical ratings (e.g., satisfaction scores).
- Test scores or academic performance metrics.
- Financial data such as income, expenses, and profit margins.
Key Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data
Understanding the differences between qualitative and quantitative data is crucial for selecting the appropriate research methods and analysis techniques. Here are some key distinctions:
When to Use Qualitative Data
Qualitative data is particularly useful in situations where the research aims to explore complex phenomena, understand human behaviour, or generate new theories. Here are some scenarios where qualitative data is the preferred choice:
Exploratory Research
When investigating a new area of study where little is known, qualitative methods can help uncover insights and generate hypotheses.
Understanding Context
Qualitative data is valuable for capturing the context surrounding a particular phenomenon, providing depth to the analysis.
Gaining Insights into Attitudes and Behaviours
When the goal is to understand why individuals think or behave in a certain way, qualitative methods such as interviews can provide rich, nuanced insights.
Developing Theories
Qualitative research can help in the development of theories by exploring relationships and patterns that quantitative methods may overlook.
When to Use Quantitative Data
Quantitative data is best suited for research that requires measurement, comparison, and statistical analysis. Here are some situations where quantitative data is the preferred choice:
Testing Hypotheses
When researchers have specific hypotheses to test , quantitative methods allow for rigorous statistical analysis to confirm or reject these hypotheses.
Measuring Variables
Quantitative data is ideal for measuring variables and establishing relationships between them, making it useful for experiments and surveys.
Generalising Findings
When the goal is to generalise findings to a larger population, quantitative research provides the necessary data to support such conclusions.
Identifying Patterns and Trends
Quantitative analysis can reveal patterns and trends in data that can inform decision-making and policy development.
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data
While qualitative and quantitative data are distinct, they can be effectively integrated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a research question. This mixed-methods approach combines the strengths of both types of data, allowing researchers to triangulate findings and gain deeper insights.
Benefits of Integration
Integrating qualitative and quantitative data enhances research by combining numerical analysis with rich, descriptive insights. This mixed-methods approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena, validating findings and providing a more nuanced perspective on research questions.
- Enhanced Validity: By using both qualitative and quantitative data, researchers can validate their findings through multiple sources of evidence.
- Rich Insights : Qualitative data can provide context and depth to quantitative findings, helping to explain the “why” behind numerical trends.
- Comprehensive Understanding: Integrating both types of data allows for a more holistic understanding of complex phenomena, leading to more informed conclusions and recommendations.
Examples of Integration
- Surveys with Open-Ended Questions: Combining closed-ended questions (quantitative) with open-ended questions (qualitative) in surveys can provide both measurable data and rich descriptive insights.
- Case Studies with Statistical Analysis: Researchers can conduct case studies (qualitative) while also collecting quantitative data to support their findings, offering a more robust analysis.
- Focus Groups with Follow-Up Surveys: After conducting focus groups (qualitative), researchers can administer surveys (quantitative) to a larger population to validate the insights gained.
Challenges and Considerations
While qualitative and quantitative data offer distinct advantages, researchers must also be aware of the challenges and considerations associated with each type:
Challenges of Qualitative Data
The challenges of qualitative data are multifaceted and can significantly impact the research process. Here are some of the primary challenges faced by researchers when working with qualitative data:
Subjectivity and Bias
One of the most significant challenges in qualitative research is the inherent subjectivity involved in data collection and analysis. Researchers’ personal beliefs, assumptions, and experiences can influence their interpretation of data.
Data Overload
Qualitative research often generates large volumes of data, which can be overwhelming. This data overload can make it challenging to identify key themes and insights. Researchers may struggle to manage and analyse vast amounts of qualitative data, leading to potential insights being overlooked.
Lack of Structure
Qualitative data is often unstructured, making it difficult to analyse systematically. The absence of a predefined format can lead to challenges in drawing meaningful conclusions from the data.
Time-Consuming Nature
Qualitative analysis can be extremely time-consuming, especially when dealing with extensive data sets. The process of collecting, transcribing, and analysing qualitative data often requires significant time and resources, which can be a barrier for researchers.
Challenges of Quantitative Data
Quantitative data provides objective, measurable evidence, it also faces challenges in capturing the full complexity of human experiences, maintaining data accuracy, and avoiding misinterpretation of statistical results. Integrating qualitative data can help overcome some of these limitations.
Limits in Capturing Complexity
Quantitative data, by its nature, can oversimplify complex phenomena and miss important nuances that qualitative data can capture. The focus on numerical measurements may not fully reflect the depth and richness of human experiences and behaviours.
Chances for Misinterpretation
Numbers can be twisted or misinterpreted if not analysed properly. Researchers must be cautious in interpreting statistical results, as correlation does not imply causation. Poor knowledge of statistical analysis can negatively impact the analysis and interpretation of quantitative data.
Influence of Measurement Errors
Due to the numerical nature of quantitative data, even small measurement errors can skew the entire dataset. Inaccuracies in data collection methods can lead to drawing incorrect conclusions from the analysis.
Lack of Context
Quantitative experiments often do not take place in natural settings. The data may lack the context and nuance that qualitative data can provide to fully explain the phenomena being studied.
Sample Size Limitations
Small sample sizes in quantitative studies can reduce the reliability of the data. Large sample sizes are needed for more accurate statistical analysis. This also affects the ability to generalise findings to wider populations.
Confirmation Bias
Researchers may miss observing important phenomena due to their focus on testing pre-determined hypotheses rather than generating new theories. The confirmation bias inherent in hypothesis testing can limit the discovery of unexpected insights.
In conclusion, understanding the distinctions between qualitative and quantitative data is essential for effective research and Data Analysis . Each type of data serves unique purposes and is suited to different contexts, making it crucial for researchers to select the appropriate methods based on their research objectives.
By integrating both qualitative and quantitative data, researchers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena, leading to richer insights and more informed decision-making.
As the landscape of research continues to evolve, the ability to effectively utilise and integrate both types of data will remain a valuable skill for researchers and analysts alike.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary difference between qualitative and quantitative data.
The primary difference is that qualitative data is descriptive and non-numerical, focusing on understanding qualities and experiences, while quantitative data is numerical and measurable, focusing on quantifying variables and testing hypotheses.
When Should I Use Qualitative Data in My Research?
Qualitative data is best used when exploring new topics, understanding complex behaviours, or generating hypotheses, particularly when context and depth are important.
Can Qualitative and Quantitative Data Be Used Together?
Yes, integrating qualitative and quantitative data can provide a more comprehensive understanding of a research question, allowing researchers to validate findings and gain richer insights.
Reviewed by:
![what is qualitative type of research ' src=](https://www.pickl.ai/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/avatar_user_26_1723028835-68x68.jpg)
Post written by: Smith Alex
Artificial Intelligence Web Scraping vs. Web Crawling: Understanding the Differences
![what is qualitative type of research metaprogramming in python](https://www.pickl.ai/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/programming-background-with-person-working-with-codes-computer-9-1-380x220.jpg)
Python Metaprogramming: Unlocking the Power of Code Manipulation
You may also like.
![what is qualitative type of research Data Analytics Projects](https://www.pickl.ai/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Types-of-Data-Analytics-Projects-Real-380x380.jpg)
- Data Analysts
Top Data Analytics Projects in 2024 for Beginners to Experienced
- July 20, 2023
![what is qualitative type of research data analytics](https://www.pickl.ai/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/image4-1-380x380.jpg)
Explaining Four Types of Analytics With Examples
- Shlok Kamat
- July 24, 2023
- 15 minute read
- Media Center
- Not yet translated
Qualitative Research
What is qualitative research.
Qualitative research is a methodology focused on collecting and analyzing descriptive, non-numerical data to understand complex human behavior, experiences, and social phenomena. This approach utilizes techniques such as interviews, focus groups, and observations to explore the underlying reasons, motivations, and meanings behind actions and decisions. Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on measuring and quantifying data, qualitative research delves into the 'why' and 'how' of human behavior, providing rich, contextual insights that reveal deeper patterns and relationships.
The Basic Idea
Theory, meet practice.
TDL is an applied research consultancy. In our work, we leverage the insights of diverse fields—from psychology and economics to machine learning and behavioral data science—to sculpt targeted solutions to nuanced problems.
Ever heard of the saying “quality over quantity”? Well, some researchers feel the same way!
Imagine you are conducting a study looking at consumer behavior for buying potato chips. You’re interested in seeing which factors influence a customer’s choice between purchasing Doritos and Pringles. While you could conduct quantitative research and measure the number of bags purchased, this data alone wouldn’t explain why consumers choose one chip brand over the other; it would just tell you what they are purchasing. To gather more meaningful data, you may conduct interviews or surveys, asking people about their chip preferences and what draws them to one brand over another. Is it the taste of the chips? The font or color of the bag? This qualitative approach dives deeper to uncover why one potato chip is more popular than the other and can help companies make the adjustments that count.
Qualitative research, as seen in the example above, can provide greater insight into behavior, going beyond numbers to understand people’s experiences, attitudes, and perceptions. It helps us to grasp the meaning behind decisions, rather than just describing them. As human behavior is often difficult to qualify, qualitative research is a useful tool for solving complex problems or as a starting point to generate new ideas for research. Qualitative methods are used across all types of research—from consumer behavior to education, healthcare, behavioral science, and everywhere in between!
At its core, qualitative research is exploratory—rather than coming up with a hypothesis and gathering numerical data to support it, qualitative research begins with open-ended questions. Instead of asking “Which chip brand do consumers buy more frequently?”, qualitative research asks “Why do consumers choose one chip brand over another?”. Common methods to obtain qualitative data include focus groups, unstructured interviews, and surveys. From the data gathered, researchers then can make hypotheses and move on to investigating them.
It’s important to note that qualitative and quantitative research are not two opposing methods, but rather two halves of a whole. Most of the best studies leverage both kinds of research by collecting objective, quantitative data, and using qualitative research to gain greater insight into what the numbers reveal.
You may have heard the world is made up of atoms and molecules, but it’s really made up of stories. When you sit with an individual that’s been here, you can give quantitative data a qualitative overlay. – William Turner, 16th century British scientist 1
Quantitative Research: A research method that involves collecting and analyzing numerical data to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and predict outcomes.
Exploratory Research: An initial study used to investigate a problem that is not clearly defined, helping to clarify concepts and improve research design.
Positivism: A scientific approach that emphasizes empirical evidence and objectivity, often involving the testing of hypotheses based on observable data. 2
Phenomenology: A research approach that emphasizes the first-person point of view, placing importance on how people perceive, experience, and interpret the world around them. 3
Social Interaction Theory: A theoretical perspective that people make sense of their social worlds by the exchange of meaning through language and symbols. 4
Critical Theory: A worldview that there is no unitary or objective “truth” about people that can be discovered, as human experience is shaped by social, cultural, and historical contexts that influences reality and society. 5
Empirical research: A method of gaining knowledge through direct observation and experimentation, relying on real-world data to test theories.
Paradigm shift: A fundamental change in the basic assumptions and methodologies of a scientific discipline, leading to the adoption of a new framework. 2
Interpretive/descriptive approach: A methodology that focuses on understanding the meanings people assign to their experiences, often using qualitative methods.
Unstructured interviews: A free-flowing conversation between researcher and participant without predetermined questions that must be asked to all participants. Instead, the researcher poses questions depending on the flow of the interview. 6
Focus Group: Group interviews where a researcher asks questions to guide a conversation between participants who are encouraged to share their ideas and information, leading to detailed insights and diverse perspectives on a specific topic.
Grounded theory : A qualitative methodology that generates a theory directly from data collected through iterative analysis.
When social sciences started to emerge in the 17th and 18th centuries, researchers wanted to apply the same quantitative approach that was used in the natural sciences. At this time, there was a predominant belief that human behavior could be numerically analyzed to find objective patterns and would be generalizable to similar people and situations. Using scientific means to understand society is known as a positivist approach. However, in the early 20th century, both natural and social scientists started to criticize this traditional view of research as being too reductive. 2
In his book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, American philosopher Thomas Kuhn identified that a major paradigm shift was starting to occur. Earlier methods of science were being questioned and replaced with new ways of approaching research which suggested that true objectivity was not possible when studying human behavior. Rather, the importance of context meant research on one group could not be generalized to all groups. 2 Numbers alone were deemed insufficient for understanding the environment surrounding human behavior which was now seen as a crucial piece of the puzzle. Along with this paradigm shift, Western scholars began to take an interest in ethnography , wanting to understand the customs, practices, and behaviors of other cultures.
Qualitative research became more prominent throughout the 20th century, expanding beyond anthropology and ethnography to being applied across all forms of research; in science, psychology, marketing—the list goes on. Paul Felix Lazarsfield, Austrian-American sociologist and mathematician often known as the father of qualitative research, popularized new methods such as unstructured interviews and group discussions. 7 During the 1940s, Lazarfield brought attention to the fact that humans are not always rational decision-makers, making them difficult to understand through numerical data alone.
The 1920s saw the invention of symbolic interaction theory, developed by George Herbert Mead. Symbolic interaction theory posits society as the product of shared symbols such as language. People attach meanings to these symbols which impacts the way they understand and communicate with the world around them, helping to create and maintain a society. 4 Critical theory was also developed in the 1920s at the University of Frankfurt Institute for Social Research. Following the challenge of positivism, critical theory is a worldview that there is no unitary or objective “truth” about people that can be discovered, as human experience is shaped by social, cultural, and historical contexts. By shedding light on the human experience, it hopes to highlight the role of power, ideology, and social structures in shaping humans, and using this knowledge to create change. 5
Other formalized theories were proposed during the 20th century, such as grounded theory , where researchers started gathering data to form a hypothesis, rather than the other way around. This represented a stark contrast to positivist approaches that had dominated the 17th and 18th centuries.
The 1950s marked a shift toward a more interpretive and descriptive approach which factored in how people make sense of their subjective reality and attach meaning to it. 2 Researchers began to recognize that the why of human behavior was just as important as the what . Max Weber, a German sociologist, laid the foundation of the interpretive approach through the concept of Verstehen (which in English translates to understanding), emphasizing the importance of interpreting the significance people attach to their behavior. 8 With the shift to an interpretive and descriptive approach came the rise of phenomenology, which emphasizes first-person experiences by studying how individuals perceive, experience, and interpret the world around them.
Today, in the age of big data, qualitative research has boomed, as advancements in digital tools allow researchers to gather vast amounts of data (both qualitative and quantitative), helping us better understand complex social phenomena. Social media patterns can be analyzed to understand public sentiment, consumer behavior, and cultural trends to grasp how people attach subjective meaning to their reality. There is even an emerging field of digital ethnography which is entirely focused on how humans interact and communicate in virtual environments!
Thomas Kuhn
American philosopher who suggested that science does not evolve through merely an addition of knowledge by compiling new learnings onto existing theories, but instead undergoes paradigm shifts where new theories and methodologies replace old ones. In this way, Kuhn suggested that science is a reflection of a community at a particular point in time. 9
Paul Felix Lazarsfeld
Often referred to as the father of qualitative research, Austrian-American sociologist and mathematician Paul Lazarsfield helped to develop modern empirical methods of conducting research in the social sciences such as surveys, opinion polling, and panel studies. Lazarsfeld was best known for combining qualitative and quantitative research to explore America's voting habits and behaviors related to mass communication, such as newspapers, magazines, and radios. 10
German sociologist and political economist known for his sociological approach of “Verstehen” which emphasized the need to understand individuals or groups by exploring the meanings that people attach to their decisions. While previously, qualitative researchers in ethnography acted like an outside observer to explain behavior from their point of view, Weber believed that an empathetic understanding of behavior, that explored both intent and context, was crucial to truly understanding behavior. 11
George Herbert Mead
Widely recognized as the father of symbolic interaction theory, Mead was an American philosopher and sociologist who took an interest in how spoken language and symbols contribute to one’s idea of self, and to society at large. 4
Consequences
Humans are incredibly complex beings, whose behaviors cannot always be reduced to mere numbers and statistics. Qualitative research acknowledges this inherent complexity and can be used to better capture the diversity of human and social realities.
Qualitative research is also more flexible—it allows researchers to pivot as they uncover new insights. Instead of approaching the study with predetermined hypotheses, oftentimes, researchers let the data speak for itself and are not limited by a set of predefined questions. It can highlight new areas that a researcher hadn’t even thought of exploring.
By providing a deeper explanation of not only what we do, but why we do it, qualitative research can be used to inform policy-making, educational practices, healthcare approaches, and marketing tactics. For instance, while quantitative research tells us how many people are smokers, qualitative research explores what, exactly, is driving them to smoke in the first place. If the research reveals that it is because they are unaware of the gravity of the consequences, efforts can be made to emphasize the risks, such as by placing warnings on cigarette cartons.
Finally, qualitative research helps to amplify the voices of marginalized or underrepresented groups. Researchers who embrace a true “Verstehen” mentality resist applying their own worldview to the subjects they study, but instead seek to understand the meaning people attach to their own behaviors. In bringing forward other worldviews, qualitative research can help to shift perceptions and increase awareness of social issues. For example, while quantitative research may show that mental health conditions are more prevalent for a certain group, along with the access they have to mental health resources, qualitative research is able to explain the lived experiences of these individuals and uncover what barriers they are facing to getting help. This qualitative approach can support governments and health organizations to better design mental health services tailored to the communities they exist in.
Controversies
Qualitative research aims to understand an individual’s lived experience, which although provides deeper insights, can make it hard to generalize to a larger population. While someone in a focus group could say they pick Doritos over Pringles because they prefer the packaging, it’s difficult for a researcher to know if this is universally applicable, or just one person’s preference. 12 This challenge makes it difficult to replicate qualitative research because it involves context-specific findings and subjective interpretation.
Moreover, there can be bias in sample selection when conducting qualitative research. Individuals who put themselves forward to be part of a focus group or interview may hold strong opinions they want to share, making the insights gathered from their answers not necessarily reflective of the general population.13 People may also give answers that they think researchers are looking for leading to skewed results, which is a common example of the observer expectancy effect .
However, the bias in this interaction can go both ways. While researchers are encouraged to embrace “Verstehen,” there is a possibility that they project their own views onto their participants. For example, if an American researcher is studying eating habits in China and observes someone burping, they may attribute this behavior to rudeness—when in fact, burping can be a sign that you have enjoyed your meal and it is a compliment to the chef. One way to mitigate this risk is through thick description , noting a great amount of contextual detail in their observations. Another way to minimize the researcher’s bias on their observations is through member checking , returning results to participants to check if they feel they accurately capture their experience.
Another drawback of qualitative research is that it is time-consuming. Focus groups and unstructured interviews take longer and are more difficult to logistically arrange, and the data gathered is harder to analyze as it goes beyond numerical data. While advances in technology alleviate some of these labor-intensive processes, they still require more resources.
Many of these drawbacks can be mitigated through a mixed-method approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research can be a good starting point, giving depth and contextual understanding to a behavior, before turning to quantitative data to see if the results are generalizable. Or, the opposite direction can be used—quantitative research can show us the “what,” identifying patterns and correlations, and researchers can then better understand the “why” behind behavior by leveraging qualitative methods. Triangulation —using multiple datasets, methods, or theories—is another way to help researchers avoid bias.
Linking Adult Behaviors to Childhood Experiences
In the mid-1980s, an obesity program at the KP San Diego Department of Preventive Medicine had a high dropout rate. What was interesting is that a majority of the dropouts were successfully losing weight, posing the question of why they were leaving the program in the first place. In this instance, greater investigation was required to understand the why behind their behaviors.
Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with almost 200 dropouts, finding that many of them had experienced childhood abuse that had led to obesity. In this unfortunate scenario, obesity was a consequence of another problem, rather than the root problem itself. This led Dr. Vincent J. Felitti, who was working for the department, to launch the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study, aimed at exploring how childhood experiences impact adult health status.
Felitti and the Department of Preventive Medicine studied over 17,000 adults with health plans that revealed a strong relationship between emotional experiences as children and negative health behaviors as adults, such as obesity, smoking, and intravenous drug use. This study demonstrates the importance of qualitative research to uncover correlations that would not be discovered by merely looking at numerical data. 14
Understanding Voter Turnout
Voting is usually considered an important part of political participation in a democracy. However, voter turnout is an issue in many countries, including the US. While quantitative research can tell us how many people vote, it does not provide insights into why people choose to vote or not.
With this in mind, Dawn Merdelin Johnson, a PhD student in philosophy at Walden University, explored how public corruption has impacted voter turnout in Cook County, Illinois. Johnson conducted semi-structured telephone interviews to understand factors that contribute to low voter turnout and the impact of public corruption on voting behaviors. Johnson found that public corruption leads to voters believing public officials prioritize their own well-being over the good of the people, leading to distrust in candidates and the overall political system, and thus making people less likely to vote. Other themes revealed that to increase voter turnout, voting should be more convenient and supply more information about the candidates to help people make more informed decisions.
From these findings, Johnson suggested that the County could experience greater voter turnout through the development of an anti-corruption agency, improved voter registration and maintenance, and enhanced voting accessibility. These initiatives would boost voting engagement and positively impact democratic participation. 15
Related TDL Content
Applying behavioral science in an organization.
At its core, behavioral science is about uncovering the reasons behind why people do what they do. That means that the role of a behavioral scientist can be quite broad, but has many important applications. In this article, Preeti Kotamarthi explains how behavioral science supports different facets of the organization, providing valuable insights for user design, data science, and product marketing.
Increasing HPV Vaccination in Rural Kenya
While HPV vaccines are an effective method of preventing cervical cancer, there is low intake in low and middle-income countries worldwide. Qualitative research can uncover the social and behavioral barriers to increasing HPV vaccination, revealing that misinformation, skepticism, and fear prevent people from getting the vaccine. In this article, our writer Annika Steele explores how qualitative insights can inform a two-part intervention strategy to increase HPV vaccination rates.
- Versta Research. (n.d.). Bridging the quantitative-qualitative gap . Versta Research. Retrieved August 17, 2024, from https://verstaresearch.com/newsletters/bridging-the-quantitative-qualitative-gap/
- Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Smith, D. W. (2018). Phenomenology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/#HistVariPhen
- Nickerson, C. (2023, October 16). Symbolic interaction theory . Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/symbolic-interaction-theory.html
- DePoy, E., & Gitlin, L. N. (2016). Introduction to research (5th ed.). Elsevier.
- ATLAS.ti. (n.d.). Unstructured interviews . ATLAS.ti. Retrieved August 17, 2024, from https://atlasti.com/research-hub/unstructured-interviews
- O'Connor, O. (2020, August 14). The history of qualitative research . Medium. https://oliconner.medium.com/the-history-of-qualitative-research-f6e07c58e439
- Sociology Institute. (n.d.). Max Weber: Interpretive sociology & legacy . Sociology Institute. Retrieved August 18, 2024, from https://sociology.institute/introduction-to-sociology/max-weber-interpretive-sociology-legacy
- Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Paul Felix Lazarsfeld . Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved August 17, 2024, from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Paul-Felix-Lazarsfeld
- Nickerson, C. (2019). Verstehen in Sociology: Empathetic Understanding . Simply Psychology. Retrieved August 18, 2024, from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/verstehen.html
- Omniconvert. (2021, October 4). Qualitative research: Definition, methodology, limitations, and examples . Omniconvert. https://www.omniconvert.com/blog/qualitative-research-definition-methodology-limitation-examples/
- Vaughan, T. (2021, August 5). 10 advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research . Poppulo. https://www.poppulo.com/blog/10-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-qualitative-research
- Felitti, V. J. (2002). The relation between adverse childhood experiences and adult health: Turning gold into lead. The Permanente Journal, 6 (1), 44–47. https://www.thepermanentejournal.org/doi/10.7812/TPP/02.994
- Johnson, D. M. (2024). Voters' perception of public corruption and low voter turnout: A qualitative case study of Cook County (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
About the Author
![what is qualitative type of research Emilie Rose Jones](https://thedecisionlab.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.prismic.io%2Fthedecisionlab%2FZkOhgCol0Zci9H-V_Emilie1.png%3Fauto%3Dformat%2Ccompress&w=1080&q=75)
Emilie Rose Jones
Emilie currently works in Marketing & Communications for a non-profit organization based in Toronto, Ontario. She completed her Masters of English Literature at UBC in 2021, where she focused on Indigenous and Canadian Literature. Emilie has a passion for writing and behavioural psychology and is always looking for opportunities to make knowledge more accessible.
We are the leading applied research & innovation consultancy
Our insights are leveraged by the most ambitious organizations.
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://thedecisionlab.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.prismic.io%2Fthedecisionlab%2Ff2069f0d-fcef-414c-aa1d-5c8cc409abd2_google-logo.png%3Fauto%3Dformat%2Ccompress&w=3840&q=75)
I was blown away with their application and translation of behavioral science into practice. They took a very complex ecosystem and created a series of interventions using an innovative mix of the latest research and creative client co-creation. I was so impressed at the final product they created, which was hugely comprehensive despite the large scope of the client being of the world's most far-reaching and best known consumer brands. I'm excited to see what we can create together in the future.
Heather McKee
BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST
GLOBAL COFFEEHOUSE CHAIN PROJECT
OUR CLIENT SUCCESS
Annual revenue increase.
By launching a behavioral science practice at the core of the organization, we helped one of the largest insurers in North America realize $30M increase in annual revenue .
Increase in Monthly Users
By redesigning North America's first national digital platform for mental health, we achieved a 52% lift in monthly users and an 83% improvement on clinical assessment.
Reduction In Design Time
By designing a new process and getting buy-in from the C-Suite team, we helped one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world reduce software design time by 75% .
Reduction in Client Drop-Off
By implementing targeted nudges based on proactive interventions, we reduced drop-off rates for 450,000 clients belonging to USA's oldest debt consolidation organizations by 46%
Randomized Controlled Trial
Psychological theories.
![what is qualitative type of research A side profile outline of a human head contains a gear within the brain area, symbolizing thinking or cognitive processes, against a plain white background.](https://thedecisionlab.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.prismic.io%2Fthedecisionlab%2F171d887d-3f1a-4a34-8f4f-6e23fea6ec13_Automatic-Thinking.png%3Fauto%3Dformat%2Ccompress&w=3840&q=75)
Automatic Thinking
![what is qualitative type of research Notes illustration](https://thedecisionlab.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.prismic.io%2Fthedecisionlab%2F84419d66-ff4a-4081-87ea-0a6a53b0a3ba_call-to-action-1.jpg%3Fauto%3Dcompress%2Cformat&w=3840&q=75)
Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?
Get new behavioral science insights in your inbox every month..
- MS in the Learning Sciences
- Tuition & Financial Aid
![what is qualitative type of research SMU Simmons School of Education & Human Development](https://assets.everspringpartners.com/dims4/default/f06e3f7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2130x345+0+0/resize/400x65!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Feverspring-brightspot.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2F8b%2F0a%2F2dc850c547788a090a14e797be37%2Fsimmons-formalhrz-digitalonly-b.png)
Qualitative vs. quantitative data analysis: How do they differ?
![what is qualitative type of research Educator presenting data to colleagues](https://assets.everspringpartners.com/dims4/default/c5c463d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/978x300+0+0/resize/800x245!/format/jpg/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Feverspring-brightspot.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2F15%2F87%2F704f055f43c08e7b1f631878bdb5%2Fsmu-qualitative-vs-quantitative-data-analysis.jpg)
Learning analytics have become the cornerstone for personalizing student experiences and enhancing learning outcomes. In this data-informed approach to education there are two distinct methodologies: qualitative and quantitative analytics. These methods, which are typical to data analytics in general, are crucial to the interpretation of learning behaviors and outcomes. This blog will explore the nuances that distinguish qualitative and quantitative research, while uncovering their shared roles in learning analytics, program design and instruction.
What is qualitative data?
Qualitative data is descriptive and includes information that is non numerical. Qualitative research is used to gather in-depth insights that can't be easily measured on a scale like opinions, anecdotes and emotions. In learning analytics qualitative data could include in depth interviews, text responses to a prompt, or a video of a class period. 1
What is quantitative data?
Quantitative data is information that has a numerical value. Quantitative research is conducted to gather measurable data used in statistical analysis. Researchers can use quantitative studies to identify patterns and trends. In learning analytics quantitative data could include test scores, student demographics, or amount of time spent in a lesson. 2
Key difference between qualitative and quantitative data
It's important to understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative data to both determine the appropriate research methods for studies and to gain insights that you can be confident in sharing.
Data Types and Nature
Examples of qualitative data types in learning analytics:
- Observational data of human behavior from classroom settings such as student engagement, teacher-student interactions, and classroom dynamics
- Textual data from open-ended survey responses, reflective journals, and written assignments
- Feedback and discussions from focus groups or interviews
- Content analysis from various media
Examples of quantitative data types:
- Standardized test, assessment, and quiz scores
- Grades and grade point averages
- Attendance records
- Time spent on learning tasks
- Data gathered from learning management systems (LMS), including login frequency, online participation, and completion rates of assignments
Methods of Collection
Qualitative and quantitative research methods for data collection can occasionally seem similar so it's important to note the differences to make sure you're creating a consistent data set and will be able to reliably draw conclusions from your data.
Qualitative research methods
Because of the nature of qualitative data (complex, detailed information), the research methods used to collect it are more involved. Qualitative researchers might do the following to collect data:
- Conduct interviews to learn about subjective experiences
- Host focus groups to gather feedback and personal accounts
- Observe in-person or use audio or video recordings to record nuances of human behavior in a natural setting
- Distribute surveys with open-ended questions
Quantitative research methods
Quantitative data collection methods are more diverse and more likely to be automated because of the objective nature of the data. A quantitative researcher could employ methods such as:
- Surveys with close-ended questions that gather numerical data like birthdates or preferences
- Observational research and record measurable information like the number of students in a classroom
- Automated numerical data collection like information collected on the backend of a computer system like button clicks and page views
Analysis techniques
Qualitative and quantitative data can both be very informative. However, research studies require critical thinking for productive analysis.
Qualitative data analysis methods
Analyzing qualitative data takes a number of steps. When you first get all your data in one place you can do a review and take notes of trends you think you're seeing or your initial reactions. Next, you'll want to organize all the qualitative data you've collected by assigning it categories. Your central research question will guide your data categorization whether it's by date, location, type of collection method (interview vs focus group, etc), the specific question asked or something else. Next, you'll code your data. Whereas categorizing data is focused on the method of collection, coding is the process of identifying and labeling themes within the data collected to get closer to answering your research questions. Finally comes data interpretation. To interpret the data you'll take a look at the information gathered including your coding labels and see what results are occurring frequently or what other conclusions you can make. 3
Quantitative analysis techniques
The process to analyze quantitative data can be time-consuming due to the large volume of data possible to collect. When approaching a quantitative data set, start by focusing in on the purpose of your evaluation. Without making a conclusion, determine how you will use the information gained from analysis; for example: The answers of this survey about study habits will help determine what type of exam review session will be most useful to a class. 4
Next, you need to decide who is analyzing the data and set parameters for analysis. For example, if two different researchers are evaluating survey responses that rank preferences on a scale from 1 to 5, they need to be operating with the same understanding of the rankings. You wouldn't want one researcher to classify the value of 3 to be a positive preference while the other considers it a negative preference. It's also ideal to have some type of data management system to store and organize your data, such as a spreadsheet or database. Within the database, or via an export to data analysis software, the collected data needs to be cleaned of things like responses left blank, duplicate answers from respondents, and questions that are no longer considered relevant. Finally, you can use statistical software to analyze data (or complete a manual analysis) to find patterns and summarize your findings. 4
Qualitative and quantitative research tools
From the nuanced, thematic exploration enabled by tools like NVivo and ATLAS.ti, to the statistical precision of SPSS and R for quantitative analysis, each suite of data analysis tools offers tailored functionalities that cater to the distinct natures of different data types.
Qualitative research software:
NVivo: NVivo is qualitative data analysis software that can do everything from transcribe recordings to create word clouds and evaluate uploads for different sentiments and themes. NVivo is just one tool from the company Lumivero, which offers whole suites of data processing software. 5
ATLAS.ti: Similar to NVivo, ATLAS.ti allows researchers to upload and import data from a variety of sources to be tagged and refined using machine learning and presented with visualizations and ready for insert into reports. 6
SPSS: SPSS is a statistical analysis tool for quantitative research, appreciated for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive statistical tests, which makes it ideal for educators and researchers. With SPSS researchers can manage and analyze large quantitative data sets, use advanced statistical procedures and modeling techniques, predict customer behaviors, forecast market trends and more. 7
R: R is a versatile and dynamic open-source tool for quantitative analysis. With a vast repository of packages tailored to specific statistical methods, researchers can perform anything from basic descriptive statistics to complex predictive modeling. R is especially useful for its ability to handle large datasets, making it ideal for educational institutions that generate substantial amounts of data. The programming language offers flexibility in customizing analysis and creating publication-quality visualizations to effectively communicate results. 8
Applications in Educational Research
Both quantitative and qualitative data can be employed in learning analytics to drive informed decision-making and pedagogical enhancements. In the classroom, quantitative data like standardized test scores and online course analytics create a foundation for assessing and benchmarking student performance and engagement. Qualitative insights gathered from surveys, focus group discussions, and reflective student journals offer a more nuanced understanding of learners' experiences and contextual factors influencing their education. Additionally feedback and practical engagement metrics blend these data types, providing a holistic view that informs curriculum development, instructional strategies, and personalized learning pathways. Through these varied data sets and uses, educators can piece together a more complete narrative of student success and the impacts of educational interventions.
Master Data Analysis with an M.S. in Learning Sciences From SMU
Whether it is the detailed narratives unearthed through qualitative data or the informative patterns derived from quantitative analysis, both qualitative and quantitative data can provide crucial information for educators and researchers to better understand and improve learning. Dive deeper into the art and science of learning analytics with SMU's online Master of Science in the Learning Sciences program . At SMU, innovation and inquiry converge to empower the next generation of educators and researchers. Choose the Learning Analytics Specialization to learn how to harness the power of data science to illuminate learning trends, devise impactful strategies, and drive educational innovation. You could also find out how advanced technologies like augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI) can revolutionize education, and develop the insight to apply embodied cognition principles to enhance learning experiences in the Learning and Technology Design Specialization , or choose your own electives to build a specialization unique to your interests and career goals.
For more information on our curriculum and to become part of a community where data drives discovery, visit SMU's MSLS program website or schedule a call with our admissions outreach advisors for any queries or further discussion. Take the first step towards transforming education with data today.
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from nnlm.gov/guides/data-glossary/qualitative-data
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from nnlm.gov/guides/data-glossary/quantitative-data
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief19.pdf
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief20.pdf
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from lumivero.com/solutions/
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from atlasti.com/
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
- Retrieved on August 8, 2024, from cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-intro.html#Introduction-and-preliminaries
Return to SMU Online Learning Sciences Blog
Southern Methodist University has engaged Everspring , a leading provider of education and technology services, to support select aspects of program delivery.
This will only take a moment
![what is qualitative type of research American Psychological Association](https://apastyle.apa.org/Content/Images/megamenu/images@2x/apa-logo.png)
Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS)
APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards offer guidance on what information should be included in all manuscript sections for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research and include how to best discuss race, ethnicity, and culture.
![what is qualitative type of research Introducing APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards for Race, Ethnicity, and Culture](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/index-race-ethnicity-culture-reporting-standards_tcm11-321701_w160_n.png)
Introducing Journal Article Reporting Standards for Race, Ethnicity, and Culture (JARS–REC)
JARS–REC were created to develop best practices related to the manner in which race, ethnicity, and culture are discussed within scientific manuscripts in psychological science.
![what is qualitative type of research graphic depicting left side of Venn diagram and the words JARS-Quant](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/btn-JARS-quant-en_tcm11-234178_w640_n.png)
Quantitative research
Use JARS–Quant when you collect your study data in numerical form or report them through statistical analyses.
![what is qualitative type of research graphic depicting right side of Venn diagram and the words JARS-Qual](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/btn-JARS-Qual-en_tcm11-234177_w640_n.png)
Qualitative research
Use JARS–Qual when you collect your study data in the form of natural language and expression.
![what is qualitative type of research graphic depicting middle of Venn diagram and the words JARS-Mixed](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/btn-JARS-Mixed-en_tcm11-234176_w640_n.png)
Mixed methods research
Use JARS–Mixed when your study combines both quantitative and qualitative methods.
![what is qualitative type of research graphic depicting left side, middle, and right side of Venn diagram](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/btn-JARS-REC-en_tcm11-328677_w640_n.png)
Race, ethnicity, culture
Use JARS–REC for all studies for guidance on how to discuss race, ethnicity, and culture.
What are APA Style JARS?
APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (APA Style Jars ) are a set of standards designed for journal authors, reviewers, and editors to enhance scientific rigor in peer-reviewed journal articles. Educators and students can use APA Style JARS as teaching and learning tools for conducting high quality research and determining what information to report in scholarly papers.
The standards include information on what should be included in all manuscript sections for:
- Quantitative research ( Jars –Quant)
- Qualitative research ( Jars –Qual)
- Mixed methods research ( Jars –Mixed)
Additionally, the APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards for Race, Ethnicity, and Culture ( Jars – Rec ) provide guidance on how to discuss race, ethnicity, and culture in scientific manuscripts. Jars – Rec should be applied to all research, whether it is quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.
- Race, Ethnicity, and Culture ( Jars – Rec )
Using these standards will make your research clearer and more accurate as well as more transparent for readers. For quantitative research, using the standards will increase the reproducibility of science. For qualitative research, using the standards will increase the methodological integrity of research.
Jars –Quant should be used in research where findings are reported numerically (quantitative research). Jars –Qual should be used in research where findings are reported using nonnumerical descriptive data (qualitative research). Jars –Mixed should be applied to research that includes both quantitative and qualitative research (mixed methods research). JARS–REC should be applied to all research, whether it is quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.
For more information on APA Style JARS:
- Read Editorial: Journal Article Reporting Standards
- View an infographic (PDF, 453KB) to learn about the benefits of JARS and how they are relevant to you
- Listen to a podcast with Drs. Harris Cooper and David Frost discussing JARS and implications for research in psychology
Many aspects of research methodology warrant a close look, and journal editors can promote better methods if we encourage authors to take responsibility to report their work in clear, understandable ways. —Nelson Cowan, Editor, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Read more testimonials
Watch a video about JARS
This content is disabled due to your privacy settings. To re-enable, please adjust your cookie preferences.
This video describes and discusses the updated APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards.
Related products
![what is qualitative type of research Reporting Qualitative Research in Psychology](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/book-tile-qualitative_tcm11-262431_w320_n.png)
Reporting Qualitative Research in Psychology
Journal article reporting standards for qualitative research
![what is qualitative type of research Reporting Quantitative Research in Psychology](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/book-tile-quantitative_tcm11-262434_w320_n.png)
Reporting Quantitative Research in Psychology
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research
![what is qualitative type of research Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/pub-manual-book-tile_tcm11-294281_w320_n.png)
Publication Manual, 7th Edition
The official source for writing papers and creating references in seventh edition APA Style
Jars resources
- History of APA’s journal article reporting standards
- APA Style JARS supplemental glossary
- Supplemental resource on the ethic of transparency in JARS
- Frequently asked questions
- JARS-Quant Decision Flowchart (PDF, 98KB)
- JARS-Quant Participant Flowchart (PDF, 98KB)
Jars articles
- Jars –Quant article
- Jars –Qual / Mixed article
- Jars – rec executive summary
Questions / feedback
Email an APA Style Expert if you have questions, feedback, or suggestions for modules to be included in future JARS updates.
APA resources
- APA Databases and Electronic Resources
- APA Journals
- Journal Author Resource Center
- Education and Career
- Psychological Science
- Open Science at APA
- How to Review a Manuscript
From the APA Style blog
![what is qualitative type of research Introducing APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards for Race, Ethnicity, and Culture](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/tile-race-ethnicity-culture-reporting-standards_tcm11-321700_w320_n.png)
Introducing APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards for Race, Ethnicity, and Culture
These standards are for all authors, reviewers, and editors seeking to improve manuscript quality by encouraging more racially and ethnically conscious and culturally responsive journal reporting standards for empirical studies in psychological science.
![what is qualitative type of research APA Style JARS for high school students](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/jars-high-school-students-tile_tcm11-316523_w320_n.jpg)
APA Style JARS for high school students
In this post, we provide an overview of APA Style JARS and resources that can be shared with high school students who want to learn more about effective communication in scholarly research.
![what is qualitative type of research Happy New Year 2022 spelled out on a background of fireworks](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/happy-new-year-2022-tile_tcm11-301051_w320_n.jpg)
Happy 2022, APA Stylers!
This blog post is dedicated to our awesome APA Style users. You can use the many resources on our website to help you master APA Style and improve your scholarly writing.
![what is qualitative type of research APA Style JARS on the EQUATOR Network](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/blog-jars-equator-network-index_tcm11-296735_w160_n.jpg)
APA Style JARS on the EQUATOR Network
The APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (APA Style JARS) have been added to the EQUATOR Network. The network aims to promote accuracy and quality in reporting of research.
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/blog-jars-index_tcm11-284640_w160_n.jpg)
APA Style JARS: Resources for instructors and students
APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (APA Style JARS) are a set of guidelines for papers reporting quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research that can be used by instructors, students, and all others reading and writing research papers.
![what is qualitative type of research Digital Commons @ University of South Florida](https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/assets/md5images/5fec8f0953fcb31a7c19287397490140.png)
- USF Research
- USF Libraries
Digital Commons @ USF > Office of Graduate Studies > USF Graduate Theses and Dissertations > USF Tampa Theses and Dissertations > 10320
USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations
A theoretical framework for understanding breast cancer survivor's post-treatment lived experiences in an educational program: a qualitative data analysis.
Katherine Jinghua Lin , University of South Florida
Graduation Year
Document type.
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Degree Granting Department
Major professor.
Cecile A. Lengacher, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., F.A. P.OS.
Committee Member
Carmen S. Rodriguez, Ph.D., A.R.N.P., A.O.C.N.
Laura A. Szalacha, Ed.D
Jennifer Wolgemuth, Ph.D.
Adaptation, Coping, Survivorship, Symptoms
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent type of cancer among women and the most common cancer diagnosis for all the population in the United States. Early screening and treatment for BC have improved the prognosis for breast cancer survivors (BCSs) and increased survival rate. Current evidence showed insufficient data related to BCSs’ post-treatment symptoms, coping issues, and availability and impact of educational and support programs associated with breast cancer survivorship.
The overall purpose of this qualitative data analysis research project is to explore and identify BCSs’ perceptions (post-treatment) of physical, cognitive, and psychological symptoms experienced, as well as perceptions of coping strategies learned during participation in a Breast Cancer-Education Support (BCES) program delivered as part of the R01 grant study “Efficacy of MBSR Treatment on Cognitive Impairment among Breast Cancer Survivors” (NIH Project # R01CA199160-01).
This research helped identify and inform gaps in the research evidence related to BCSs' post-treatment lived experiences and their unmet cancer survivorship needs through qualitative content analysis of BCSs’ weekly journals and survey entries. The research findings also contributed to providing new evidence to strengthen health care professionals’, communities’, and families’ understanding of BCSs’ cancer trajectory across their cancer continuum and identify unmet needs related to their survivorship. This study added valuable qualitative data to define these survivors’ real experiences and meet the knowledge gaps in this arena. As a result, it was anticipated that the care plan for cancer survivors can be tailored to individual needs and can provide data for designing cancer education and support programs to improve BCSs’ quality of life.
Directed qualitative content analysis using deductive and inductive coding, and poetic analysis were used as the research method for this study. Four key themes were identified: 1) enduring and suffering; 2) decreased quality of life; 3) coping and comforting strategies; and 4) the change of self. Eleven voice poems emerged using poetic analysis and the BCSs’ original words. Poems were attached to each theme to bring those themes to 'life' and help connect the readers emotionally to the BCSs' life experiences.
In conclusion, this study added valuable qualitative data to define BCSs’ post-treatment real life experiences based on their perceptions. This study also contributed to nursing theory by adding the suggested expansion of Morse’s Responding to Threats to the Integrity of Self theory.
Scholar Commons Citation
Lin, Katherine Jinghua, "A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Breast Cancer Survivor's Post-treatment Lived Experiences in an Educational Program: A Qualitative Data Analysis" (2022). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/10320
Since August 26, 2024
Included in
Nursing Commons , Philosophy of Science Commons , Women's Studies Commons
Advanced Search
- Email Notifications and RSS
- All Collections
- USF Faculty Publications
- Open Access Journals
- Conferences and Events
- Theses and Dissertations
- Textbooks Collection
Useful Links
- USF Office of Graduate Studies
- Rights Information
- SelectedWorks
- Submit Research
Home | About | Help | My Account | Accessibility Statement | Language and Diversity Statements
Privacy Copyright
What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research
- Open access
- Published: 27 February 2019
- Volume 42 , pages 139–160, ( 2019 )
Cite this article
You have full access to this open access article
- Patrik Aspers 1 , 2 &
- Ugo Corte 3
626k Accesses
344 Citations
24 Altmetric
Explore all metrics
What is qualitative research? If we look for a precise definition of qualitative research, and specifically for one that addresses its distinctive feature of being “qualitative,” the literature is meager. In this article we systematically search, identify and analyze a sample of 89 sources using or attempting to define the term “qualitative.” Then, drawing on ideas we find scattered across existing work, and based on Becker’s classic study of marijuana consumption, we formulate and illustrate a definition that tries to capture its core elements. We define qualitative research as an iterative process in which improved understanding to the scientific community is achieved by making new significant distinctions resulting from getting closer to the phenomenon studied. This formulation is developed as a tool to help improve research designs while stressing that a qualitative dimension is present in quantitative work as well. Additionally, it can facilitate teaching, communication between researchers, diminish the gap between qualitative and quantitative researchers, help to address critiques of qualitative methods, and be used as a standard of evaluation of qualitative research.
Similar content being viewed by others
![what is qualitative type of research what is qualitative type of research](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3Aplaceholder%2Fimages/placeholder-figure-springernature.png)
What is Qualitative in Research
Unsettling definitions of qualitative research, what is “qualitative” in qualitative research why the answer does not matter but the question is important, explore related subjects.
- Artificial Intelligence
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
If we assume that there is something called qualitative research, what exactly is this qualitative feature? And how could we evaluate qualitative research as good or not? Is it fundamentally different from quantitative research? In practice, most active qualitative researchers working with empirical material intuitively know what is involved in doing qualitative research, yet perhaps surprisingly, a clear definition addressing its key feature is still missing.
To address the question of what is qualitative we turn to the accounts of “qualitative research” in textbooks and also in empirical work. In his classic, explorative, interview study of deviance Howard Becker ( 1963 ) asks ‘How does one become a marijuana user?’ In contrast to pre-dispositional and psychological-individualistic theories of deviant behavior, Becker’s inherently social explanation contends that becoming a user of this substance is the result of a three-phase sequential learning process. First, potential users need to learn how to smoke it properly to produce the “correct” effects. If not, they are likely to stop experimenting with it. Second, they need to discover the effects associated with it; in other words, to get “high,” individuals not only have to experience what the drug does, but also to become aware that those sensations are related to using it. Third, they require learning to savor the feelings related to its consumption – to develop an acquired taste. Becker, who played music himself, gets close to the phenomenon by observing, taking part, and by talking to people consuming the drug: “half of the fifty interviews were conducted with musicians, the other half covered a wide range of people, including laborers, machinists, and people in the professions” (Becker 1963 :56).
Another central aspect derived through the common-to-all-research interplay between induction and deduction (Becker 2017 ), is that during the course of his research Becker adds scientifically meaningful new distinctions in the form of three phases—distinctions, or findings if you will, that strongly affect the course of his research: its focus, the material that he collects, and which eventually impact his findings. Each phase typically unfolds through social interaction, and often with input from experienced users in “a sequence of social experiences during which the person acquires a conception of the meaning of the behavior, and perceptions and judgments of objects and situations, all of which make the activity possible and desirable” (Becker 1963 :235). In this study the increased understanding of smoking dope is a result of a combination of the meaning of the actors, and the conceptual distinctions that Becker introduces based on the views expressed by his respondents. Understanding is the result of research and is due to an iterative process in which data, concepts and evidence are connected with one another (Becker 2017 ).
Indeed, there are many definitions of qualitative research, but if we look for a definition that addresses its distinctive feature of being “qualitative,” the literature across the broad field of social science is meager. The main reason behind this article lies in the paradox, which, to put it bluntly, is that researchers act as if they know what it is, but they cannot formulate a coherent definition. Sociologists and others will of course continue to conduct good studies that show the relevance and value of qualitative research addressing scientific and practical problems in society. However, our paper is grounded in the idea that providing a clear definition will help us improve the work that we do. Among researchers who practice qualitative research there is clearly much knowledge. We suggest that a definition makes this knowledge more explicit. If the first rationale for writing this paper refers to the “internal” aim of improving qualitative research, the second refers to the increased “external” pressure that especially many qualitative researchers feel; pressure that comes both from society as well as from other scientific approaches. There is a strong core in qualitative research, and leading researchers tend to agree on what it is and how it is done. Our critique is not directed at the practice of qualitative research, but we do claim that the type of systematic work we do has not yet been done, and that it is useful to improve the field and its status in relation to quantitative research.
The literature on the “internal” aim of improving, or at least clarifying qualitative research is large, and we do not claim to be the first to notice the vagueness of the term “qualitative” (Strauss and Corbin 1998 ). Also, others have noted that there is no single definition of it (Long and Godfrey 2004 :182), that there are many different views on qualitative research (Denzin and Lincoln 2003 :11; Jovanović 2011 :3), and that more generally, we need to define its meaning (Best 2004 :54). Strauss and Corbin ( 1998 ), for example, as well as Nelson et al. (1992:2 cited in Denzin and Lincoln 2003 :11), and Flick ( 2007 :ix–x), have recognized that the term is problematic: “Actually, the term ‘qualitative research’ is confusing because it can mean different things to different people” (Strauss and Corbin 1998 :10–11). Hammersley has discussed the possibility of addressing the problem, but states that “the task of providing an account of the distinctive features of qualitative research is far from straightforward” ( 2013 :2). This confusion, as he has recently further argued (Hammersley 2018 ), is also salient in relation to ethnography where different philosophical and methodological approaches lead to a lack of agreement about what it means.
Others (e.g. Hammersley 2018 ; Fine and Hancock 2017 ) have also identified the treat to qualitative research that comes from external forces, seen from the point of view of “qualitative research.” This threat can be further divided into that which comes from inside academia, such as the critique voiced by “quantitative research” and outside of academia, including, for example, New Public Management. Hammersley ( 2018 ), zooming in on one type of qualitative research, ethnography, has argued that it is under treat. Similarly to Fine ( 2003 ), and before him Gans ( 1999 ), he writes that ethnography’ has acquired a range of meanings, and comes in many different versions, these often reflecting sharply divergent epistemological orientations. And already more than twenty years ago while reviewing Denzin and Lincoln’ s Handbook of Qualitative Methods Fine argued:
While this increasing centrality [of qualitative research] might lead one to believe that consensual standards have developed, this belief would be misleading. As the methodology becomes more widely accepted, querulous challengers have raised fundamental questions that collectively have undercut the traditional models of how qualitative research is to be fashioned and presented (1995:417).
According to Hammersley, there are today “serious treats to the practice of ethnographic work, on almost any definition” ( 2018 :1). He lists five external treats: (1) that social research must be accountable and able to show its impact on society; (2) the current emphasis on “big data” and the emphasis on quantitative data and evidence; (3) the labor market pressure in academia that leaves less time for fieldwork (see also Fine and Hancock 2017 ); (4) problems of access to fields; and (5) the increased ethical scrutiny of projects, to which ethnography is particularly exposed. Hammersley discusses some more or less insufficient existing definitions of ethnography.
The current situation, as Hammersley and others note—and in relation not only to ethnography but also qualitative research in general, and as our empirical study shows—is not just unsatisfactory, it may even be harmful for the entire field of qualitative research, and does not help social science at large. We suggest that the lack of clarity of qualitative research is a real problem that must be addressed.
Towards a Definition of Qualitative Research
Seen in an historical light, what is today called qualitative, or sometimes ethnographic, interpretative research – or a number of other terms – has more or less always existed. At the time the founders of sociology – Simmel, Weber, Durkheim and, before them, Marx – were writing, and during the era of the Methodenstreit (“dispute about methods”) in which the German historical school emphasized scientific methods (cf. Swedberg 1990 ), we can at least speak of qualitative forerunners.
Perhaps the most extended discussion of what later became known as qualitative methods in a classic work is Bronisław Malinowski’s ( 1922 ) Argonauts in the Western Pacific , although even this study does not explicitly address the meaning of “qualitative.” In Weber’s ([1921–-22] 1978) work we find a tension between scientific explanations that are based on observation and quantification and interpretative research (see also Lazarsfeld and Barton 1982 ).
If we look through major sociology journals like the American Sociological Review , American Journal of Sociology , or Social Forces we will not find the term qualitative sociology before the 1970s. And certainly before then much of what we consider qualitative classics in sociology, like Becker’ study ( 1963 ), had already been produced. Indeed, the Chicago School often combined qualitative and quantitative data within the same study (Fine 1995 ). Our point being that before a disciplinary self-awareness the term quantitative preceded qualitative, and the articulation of the former was a political move to claim scientific status (Denzin and Lincoln 2005 ). In the US the World War II seem to have sparked a critique of sociological work, including “qualitative work,” that did not follow the scientific canon (Rawls 2018 ), which was underpinned by a scientifically oriented and value free philosophy of science. As a result the attempts and practice of integrating qualitative and quantitative sociology at Chicago lost ground to sociology that was more oriented to surveys and quantitative work at Columbia under Merton-Lazarsfeld. The quantitative tradition was also able to present textbooks (Lundberg 1951 ) that facilitated the use this approach and its “methods.” The practices of the qualitative tradition, by and large, remained tacit or was part of the mentoring transferred from the renowned masters to their students.
This glimpse into history leads us back to the lack of a coherent account condensed in a definition of qualitative research. Many of the attempts to define the term do not meet the requirements of a proper definition: A definition should be clear, avoid tautology, demarcate its domain in relation to the environment, and ideally only use words in its definiens that themselves are not in need of definition (Hempel 1966 ). A definition can enhance precision and thus clarity by identifying the core of the phenomenon. Preferably, a definition should be short. The typical definition we have found, however, is an ostensive definition, which indicates what qualitative research is about without informing us about what it actually is :
Qualitative research is multimethod in focus, involving an interpretative, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them. Qualitative research involves the studied use and collection of a variety of empirical materials – case study, personal experience, introspective, life story, interview, observational, historical, interactional, and visual texts – that describe routine and problematic moments and meanings in individuals’ lives. (Denzin and Lincoln 2005 :2)
Flick claims that the label “qualitative research” is indeed used as an umbrella for a number of approaches ( 2007 :2–4; 2002 :6), and it is not difficult to identify research fitting this designation. Moreover, whatever it is, it has grown dramatically over the past five decades. In addition, courses have been developed, methods have flourished, arguments about its future have been advanced (for example, Denzin and Lincoln 1994) and criticized (for example, Snow and Morrill 1995 ), and dedicated journals and books have mushroomed. Most social scientists have a clear idea of research and how it differs from journalism, politics and other activities. But the question of what is qualitative in qualitative research is either eluded or eschewed.
We maintain that this lacuna hinders systematic knowledge production based on qualitative research. Paul Lazarsfeld noted the lack of “codification” as early as 1955 when he reviewed 100 qualitative studies in order to offer a codification of the practices (Lazarsfeld and Barton 1982 :239). Since then many texts on “qualitative research” and its methods have been published, including recent attempts (Goertz and Mahoney 2012 ) similar to Lazarsfeld’s. These studies have tried to extract what is qualitative by looking at the large number of empirical “qualitative” studies. Our novel strategy complements these endeavors by taking another approach and looking at the attempts to codify these practices in the form of a definition, as well as to a minor extent take Becker’s study as an exemplar of what qualitative researchers actually do, and what the characteristic of being ‘qualitative’ denotes and implies. We claim that qualitative researchers, if there is such a thing as “qualitative research,” should be able to codify their practices in a condensed, yet general way expressed in language.
Lingering problems of “generalizability” and “how many cases do I need” (Small 2009 ) are blocking advancement – in this line of work qualitative approaches are said to differ considerably from quantitative ones, while some of the former unsuccessfully mimic principles related to the latter (Small 2009 ). Additionally, quantitative researchers sometimes unfairly criticize the first based on their own quality criteria. Scholars like Goertz and Mahoney ( 2012 ) have successfully focused on the different norms and practices beyond what they argue are essentially two different cultures: those working with either qualitative or quantitative methods. Instead, similarly to Becker ( 2017 ) who has recently questioned the usefulness of the distinction between qualitative and quantitative research, we focus on similarities.
The current situation also impedes both students and researchers in focusing their studies and understanding each other’s work (Lazarsfeld and Barton 1982 :239). A third consequence is providing an opening for critiques by scholars operating within different traditions (Valsiner 2000 :101). A fourth issue is that the “implicit use of methods in qualitative research makes the field far less standardized than the quantitative paradigm” (Goertz and Mahoney 2012 :9). Relatedly, the National Science Foundation in the US organized two workshops in 2004 and 2005 to address the scientific foundations of qualitative research involving strategies to improve it and to develop standards of evaluation in qualitative research. However, a specific focus on its distinguishing feature of being “qualitative” while being implicitly acknowledged, was discussed only briefly (for example, Best 2004 ).
In 2014 a theme issue was published in this journal on “Methods, Materials, and Meanings: Designing Cultural Analysis,” discussing central issues in (cultural) qualitative research (Berezin 2014 ; Biernacki 2014 ; Glaeser 2014 ; Lamont and Swidler 2014 ; Spillman 2014). We agree with many of the arguments put forward, such as the risk of methodological tribalism, and that we should not waste energy on debating methods separated from research questions. Nonetheless, a clarification of the relation to what is called “quantitative research” is of outmost importance to avoid misunderstandings and misguided debates between “qualitative” and “quantitative” researchers. Our strategy means that researchers, “qualitative” or “quantitative” they may be, in their actual practice may combine qualitative work and quantitative work.
In this article we accomplish three tasks. First, we systematically survey the literature for meanings of qualitative research by looking at how researchers have defined it. Drawing upon existing knowledge we find that the different meanings and ideas of qualitative research are not yet coherently integrated into one satisfactory definition. Next, we advance our contribution by offering a definition of qualitative research and illustrate its meaning and use partially by expanding on the brief example introduced earlier related to Becker’s work ( 1963 ). We offer a systematic analysis of central themes of what researchers consider to be the core of “qualitative,” regardless of style of work. These themes – which we summarize in terms of four keywords: distinction, process, closeness, improved understanding – constitute part of our literature review, in which each one appears, sometimes with others, but never all in the same definition. They serve as the foundation of our contribution. Our categories are overlapping. Their use is primarily to organize the large amount of definitions we have identified and analyzed, and not necessarily to draw a clear distinction between them. Finally, we continue the elaboration discussed above on the advantages of a clear definition of qualitative research.
In a hermeneutic fashion we propose that there is something meaningful that deserves to be labelled “qualitative research” (Gadamer 1990 ). To approach the question “What is qualitative in qualitative research?” we have surveyed the literature. In conducting our survey we first traced the word’s etymology in dictionaries, encyclopedias, handbooks of the social sciences and of methods and textbooks, mainly in English, which is common to methodology courses. It should be noted that we have zoomed in on sociology and its literature. This discipline has been the site of the largest debate and development of methods that can be called “qualitative,” which suggests that this field should be examined in great detail.
In an ideal situation we should expect that one good definition, or at least some common ideas, would have emerged over the years. This common core of qualitative research should be so accepted that it would appear in at least some textbooks. Since this is not what we found, we decided to pursue an inductive approach to capture maximal variation in the field of qualitative research; we searched in a selection of handbooks, textbooks, book chapters, and books, to which we added the analysis of journal articles. Our sample comprises a total of 89 references.
In practice we focused on the discipline that has had a clear discussion of methods, namely sociology. We also conducted a broad search in the JSTOR database to identify scholarly sociology articles published between 1998 and 2017 in English with a focus on defining or explaining qualitative research. We specifically zoom in on this time frame because we would have expect that this more mature period would have produced clear discussions on the meaning of qualitative research. To find these articles we combined a number of keywords to search the content and/or the title: qualitative (which was always included), definition, empirical, research, methodology, studies, fieldwork, interview and observation .
As a second phase of our research we searched within nine major sociological journals ( American Journal of Sociology , Sociological Theory , American Sociological Review , Contemporary Sociology , Sociological Forum , Sociological Theory , Qualitative Research , Qualitative Sociology and Qualitative Sociology Review ) for articles also published during the past 19 years (1998–2017) that had the term “qualitative” in the title and attempted to define qualitative research.
Lastly we picked two additional journals, Qualitative Research and Qualitative Sociology , in which we could expect to find texts addressing the notion of “qualitative.” From Qualitative Research we chose Volume 14, Issue 6, December 2014, and from Qualitative Sociology we chose Volume 36, Issue 2, June 2017. Within each of these we selected the first article; then we picked the second article of three prior issues. Again we went back another three issues and investigated article number three. Finally we went back another three issues and perused article number four. This selection criteria was used to get a manageable sample for the analysis.
The coding process of the 89 references we gathered in our selected review began soon after the first round of material was gathered, and we reduced the complexity created by our maximum variation sampling (Snow and Anderson 1993 :22) to four different categories within which questions on the nature and properties of qualitative research were discussed. We call them: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, Qualitative Research, Fieldwork, and Grounded Theory. This – which may appear as an illogical grouping – merely reflects the “context” in which the matter of “qualitative” is discussed. If the selection process of the material – books and articles – was informed by pre-knowledge, we used an inductive strategy to code the material. When studying our material, we identified four central notions related to “qualitative” that appear in various combinations in the literature which indicate what is the core of qualitative research. We have labeled them: “distinctions”, “process,” “closeness,” and “improved understanding.” During the research process the categories and notions were improved, refined, changed, and reordered. The coding ended when a sense of saturation in the material arose. In the presentation below all quotations and references come from our empirical material of texts on qualitative research.
Analysis – What is Qualitative Research?
In this section we describe the four categories we identified in the coding, how they differently discuss qualitative research, as well as their overall content. Some salient quotations are selected to represent the type of text sorted under each of the four categories. What we present are examples from the literature.
Qualitative and Quantitative
This analytic category comprises quotations comparing qualitative and quantitative research, a distinction that is frequently used (Brown 2010 :231); in effect this is a conceptual pair that structures the discussion and that may be associated with opposing interests. While the general goal of quantitative and qualitative research is the same – to understand the world better – their methodologies and focus in certain respects differ substantially (Becker 1966 :55). Quantity refers to that property of something that can be determined by measurement. In a dictionary of Statistics and Methodology we find that “(a) When referring to *variables, ‘qualitative’ is another term for *categorical or *nominal. (b) When speaking of kinds of research, ‘qualitative’ refers to studies of subjects that are hard to quantify, such as art history. Qualitative research tends to be a residual category for almost any kind of non-quantitative research” (Stiles 1998:183). But it should be obvious that one could employ a quantitative approach when studying, for example, art history.
The same dictionary states that quantitative is “said of variables or research that can be handled numerically, usually (too sharply) contrasted with *qualitative variables and research” (Stiles 1998:184). From a qualitative perspective “quantitative research” is about numbers and counting, and from a quantitative perspective qualitative research is everything that is not about numbers. But this does not say much about what is “qualitative.” If we turn to encyclopedias we find that in the 1932 edition of the Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences there is no mention of “qualitative.” In the Encyclopedia from 1968 we can read:
Qualitative Analysis. For methods of obtaining, analyzing, and describing data, see [the various entries:] CONTENT ANALYSIS; COUNTED DATA; EVALUATION RESEARCH, FIELD WORK; GRAPHIC PRESENTATION; HISTORIOGRAPHY, especially the article on THE RHETORIC OF HISTORY; INTERVIEWING; OBSERVATION; PERSONALITY MEASUREMENT; PROJECTIVE METHODS; PSYCHOANALYSIS, article on EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; SURVEY ANALYSIS, TABULAR PRESENTATION; TYPOLOGIES. (Vol. 13:225)
Some, like Alford, divide researchers into methodologists or, in his words, “quantitative and qualitative specialists” (Alford 1998 :12). Qualitative research uses a variety of methods, such as intensive interviews or in-depth analysis of historical materials, and it is concerned with a comprehensive account of some event or unit (King et al. 1994 :4). Like quantitative research it can be utilized to study a variety of issues, but it tends to focus on meanings and motivations that underlie cultural symbols, personal experiences, phenomena and detailed understanding of processes in the social world. In short, qualitative research centers on understanding processes, experiences, and the meanings people assign to things (Kalof et al. 2008 :79).
Others simply say that qualitative methods are inherently unscientific (Jovanović 2011 :19). Hood, for instance, argues that words are intrinsically less precise than numbers, and that they are therefore more prone to subjective analysis, leading to biased results (Hood 2006 :219). Qualitative methodologies have raised concerns over the limitations of quantitative templates (Brady et al. 2004 :4). Scholars such as King et al. ( 1994 ), for instance, argue that non-statistical research can produce more reliable results if researchers pay attention to the rules of scientific inference commonly stated in quantitative research. Also, researchers such as Becker ( 1966 :59; 1970 :42–43) have asserted that, if conducted properly, qualitative research and in particular ethnographic field methods, can lead to more accurate results than quantitative studies, in particular, survey research and laboratory experiments.
Some researchers, such as Kalof, Dan, and Dietz ( 2008 :79) claim that the boundaries between the two approaches are becoming blurred, and Small ( 2009 ) argues that currently much qualitative research (especially in North America) tries unsuccessfully and unnecessarily to emulate quantitative standards. For others, qualitative research tends to be more humanistic and discursive (King et al. 1994 :4). Ragin ( 1994 ), and similarly also Becker, ( 1996 :53), Marchel and Owens ( 2007 :303) think that the main distinction between the two styles is overstated and does not rest on the simple dichotomy of “numbers versus words” (Ragin 1994 :xii). Some claim that quantitative data can be utilized to discover associations, but in order to unveil cause and effect a complex research design involving the use of qualitative approaches needs to be devised (Gilbert 2009 :35). Consequently, qualitative data are useful for understanding the nuances lying beyond those processes as they unfold (Gilbert 2009 :35). Others contend that qualitative research is particularly well suited both to identify causality and to uncover fine descriptive distinctions (Fine and Hallett 2014 ; Lichterman and Isaac Reed 2014 ; Katz 2015 ).
There are other ways to separate these two traditions, including normative statements about what qualitative research should be (that is, better or worse than quantitative approaches, concerned with scientific approaches to societal change or vice versa; Snow and Morrill 1995 ; Denzin and Lincoln 2005 ), or whether it should develop falsifiable statements; Best 2004 ).
We propose that quantitative research is largely concerned with pre-determined variables (Small 2008 ); the analysis concerns the relations between variables. These categories are primarily not questioned in the study, only their frequency or degree, or the correlations between them (cf. Franzosi 2016 ). If a researcher studies wage differences between women and men, he or she works with given categories: x number of men are compared with y number of women, with a certain wage attributed to each person. The idea is not to move beyond the given categories of wage, men and women; they are the starting point as well as the end point, and undergo no “qualitative change.” Qualitative research, in contrast, investigates relations between categories that are themselves subject to change in the research process. Returning to Becker’s study ( 1963 ), we see that he questioned pre-dispositional theories of deviant behavior working with pre-determined variables such as an individual’s combination of personal qualities or emotional problems. His take, in contrast, was to understand marijuana consumption by developing “variables” as part of the investigation. Thereby he presented new variables, or as we would say today, theoretical concepts, but which are grounded in the empirical material.
Qualitative Research
This category contains quotations that refer to descriptions of qualitative research without making comparisons with quantitative research. Researchers such as Denzin and Lincoln, who have written a series of influential handbooks on qualitative methods (1994; Denzin and Lincoln 2003 ; 2005 ), citing Nelson et al. (1992:4), argue that because qualitative research is “interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and sometimes counterdisciplinary” it is difficult to derive one single definition of it (Jovanović 2011 :3). According to them, in fact, “the field” is “many things at the same time,” involving contradictions, tensions over its focus, methods, and how to derive interpretations and findings ( 2003 : 11). Similarly, others, such as Flick ( 2007 :ix–x) contend that agreeing on an accepted definition has increasingly become problematic, and that qualitative research has possibly matured different identities. However, Best holds that “the proliferation of many sorts of activities under the label of qualitative sociology threatens to confuse our discussions” ( 2004 :54). Atkinson’s position is more definite: “the current state of qualitative research and research methods is confused” ( 2005 :3–4).
Qualitative research is about interpretation (Blumer 1969 ; Strauss and Corbin 1998 ; Denzin and Lincoln 2003 ), or Verstehen [understanding] (Frankfort-Nachmias and Nachmias 1996 ). It is “multi-method,” involving the collection and use of a variety of empirical materials (Denzin and Lincoln 1998; Silverman 2013 ) and approaches (Silverman 2005 ; Flick 2007 ). It focuses not only on the objective nature of behavior but also on its subjective meanings: individuals’ own accounts of their attitudes, motivations, behavior (McIntyre 2005 :127; Creswell 2009 ), events and situations (Bryman 1989) – what people say and do in specific places and institutions (Goodwin and Horowitz 2002 :35–36) in social and temporal contexts (Morrill and Fine 1997). For this reason, following Weber ([1921-22] 1978), it can be described as an interpretative science (McIntyre 2005 :127). But could quantitative research also be concerned with these questions? Also, as pointed out below, does all qualitative research focus on subjective meaning, as some scholars suggest?
Others also distinguish qualitative research by claiming that it collects data using a naturalistic approach (Denzin and Lincoln 2005 :2; Creswell 2009 ), focusing on the meaning actors ascribe to their actions. But again, does all qualitative research need to be collected in situ? And does qualitative research have to be inherently concerned with meaning? Flick ( 2007 ), referring to Denzin and Lincoln ( 2005 ), mentions conversation analysis as an example of qualitative research that is not concerned with the meanings people bring to a situation, but rather with the formal organization of talk. Still others, such as Ragin ( 1994 :85), note that qualitative research is often (especially early on in the project, we would add) less structured than other kinds of social research – a characteristic connected to its flexibility and that can lead both to potentially better, but also worse results. But is this not a feature of this type of research, rather than a defining description of its essence? Wouldn’t this comment also apply, albeit to varying degrees, to quantitative research?
In addition, Strauss ( 2003 ), along with others, such as Alvesson and Kärreman ( 2011 :10–76), argue that qualitative researchers struggle to capture and represent complex phenomena partially because they tend to collect a large amount of data. While his analysis is correct at some points – “It is necessary to do detailed, intensive, microscopic examination of the data in order to bring out the amazing complexity of what lies in, behind, and beyond those data” (Strauss 2003 :10) – much of his analysis concerns the supposed focus of qualitative research and its challenges, rather than exactly what it is about. But even in this instance we would make a weak case arguing that these are strictly the defining features of qualitative research. Some researchers seem to focus on the approach or the methods used, or even on the way material is analyzed. Several researchers stress the naturalistic assumption of investigating the world, suggesting that meaning and interpretation appear to be a core matter of qualitative research.
We can also see that in this category there is no consensus about specific qualitative methods nor about qualitative data. Many emphasize interpretation, but quantitative research, too, involves interpretation; the results of a regression analysis, for example, certainly have to be interpreted, and the form of meta-analysis that factor analysis provides indeed requires interpretation However, there is no interpretation of quantitative raw data, i.e., numbers in tables. One common thread is that qualitative researchers have to get to grips with their data in order to understand what is being studied in great detail, irrespective of the type of empirical material that is being analyzed. This observation is connected to the fact that qualitative researchers routinely make several adjustments of focus and research design as their studies progress, in many cases until the very end of the project (Kalof et al. 2008 ). If you, like Becker, do not start out with a detailed theory, adjustments such as the emergence and refinement of research questions will occur during the research process. We have thus found a number of useful reflections about qualitative research scattered across different sources, but none of them effectively describe the defining characteristics of this approach.
Although qualitative research does not appear to be defined in terms of a specific method, it is certainly common that fieldwork, i.e., research that entails that the researcher spends considerable time in the field that is studied and use the knowledge gained as data, is seen as emblematic of or even identical to qualitative research. But because we understand that fieldwork tends to focus primarily on the collection and analysis of qualitative data, we expected to find within it discussions on the meaning of “qualitative.” But, again, this was not the case.
Instead, we found material on the history of this approach (for example, Frankfort-Nachmias and Nachmias 1996 ; Atkinson et al. 2001), including how it has changed; for example, by adopting a more self-reflexive practice (Heyl 2001), as well as the different nomenclature that has been adopted, such as fieldwork, ethnography, qualitative research, naturalistic research, participant observation and so on (for example, Lofland et al. 2006 ; Gans 1999 ).
We retrieved definitions of ethnography, such as “the study of people acting in the natural courses of their daily lives,” involving a “resocialization of the researcher” (Emerson 1988 :1) through intense immersion in others’ social worlds (see also examples in Hammersley 2018 ). This may be accomplished by direct observation and also participation (Neuman 2007 :276), although others, such as Denzin ( 1970 :185), have long recognized other types of observation, including non-participant (“fly on the wall”). In this category we have also isolated claims and opposing views, arguing that this type of research is distinguished primarily by where it is conducted (natural settings) (Hughes 1971:496), and how it is carried out (a variety of methods are applied) or, for some most importantly, by involving an active, empathetic immersion in those being studied (Emerson 1988 :2). We also retrieved descriptions of the goals it attends in relation to how it is taught (understanding subjective meanings of the people studied, primarily develop theory, or contribute to social change) (see for example, Corte and Irwin 2017 ; Frankfort-Nachmias and Nachmias 1996 :281; Trier-Bieniek 2012 :639) by collecting the richest possible data (Lofland et al. 2006 ) to derive “thick descriptions” (Geertz 1973 ), and/or to aim at theoretical statements of general scope and applicability (for example, Emerson 1988 ; Fine 2003 ). We have identified guidelines on how to evaluate it (for example Becker 1996 ; Lamont 2004 ) and have retrieved instructions on how it should be conducted (for example, Lofland et al. 2006 ). For instance, analysis should take place while the data gathering unfolds (Emerson 1988 ; Hammersley and Atkinson 2007 ; Lofland et al. 2006 ), observations should be of long duration (Becker 1970 :54; Goffman 1989 ), and data should be of high quantity (Becker 1970 :52–53), as well as other questionable distinctions between fieldwork and other methods:
Field studies differ from other methods of research in that the researcher performs the task of selecting topics, decides what questions to ask, and forges interest in the course of the research itself . This is in sharp contrast to many ‘theory-driven’ and ‘hypothesis-testing’ methods. (Lofland and Lofland 1995 :5)
But could not, for example, a strictly interview-based study be carried out with the same amount of flexibility, such as sequential interviewing (for example, Small 2009 )? Once again, are quantitative approaches really as inflexible as some qualitative researchers think? Moreover, this category stresses the role of the actors’ meaning, which requires knowledge and close interaction with people, their practices and their lifeworld.
It is clear that field studies – which are seen by some as the “gold standard” of qualitative research – are nonetheless only one way of doing qualitative research. There are other methods, but it is not clear why some are more qualitative than others, or why they are better or worse. Fieldwork is characterized by interaction with the field (the material) and understanding of the phenomenon that is being studied. In Becker’s case, he had general experience from fields in which marihuana was used, based on which he did interviews with actual users in several fields.
Grounded Theory
Another major category we identified in our sample is Grounded Theory. We found descriptions of it most clearly in Glaser and Strauss’ ([1967] 2010 ) original articulation, Strauss and Corbin ( 1998 ) and Charmaz ( 2006 ), as well as many other accounts of what it is for: generating and testing theory (Strauss 2003 :xi). We identified explanations of how this task can be accomplished – such as through two main procedures: constant comparison and theoretical sampling (Emerson 1998:96), and how using it has helped researchers to “think differently” (for example, Strauss and Corbin 1998 :1). We also read descriptions of its main traits, what it entails and fosters – for instance, an exceptional flexibility, an inductive approach (Strauss and Corbin 1998 :31–33; 1990; Esterberg 2002 :7), an ability to step back and critically analyze situations, recognize tendencies towards bias, think abstractly and be open to criticism, enhance sensitivity towards the words and actions of respondents, and develop a sense of absorption and devotion to the research process (Strauss and Corbin 1998 :5–6). Accordingly, we identified discussions of the value of triangulating different methods (both using and not using grounded theory), including quantitative ones, and theories to achieve theoretical development (most comprehensively in Denzin 1970 ; Strauss and Corbin 1998 ; Timmermans and Tavory 2012 ). We have also located arguments about how its practice helps to systematize data collection, analysis and presentation of results (Glaser and Strauss [1967] 2010 :16).
Grounded theory offers a systematic approach which requires researchers to get close to the field; closeness is a requirement of identifying questions and developing new concepts or making further distinctions with regard to old concepts. In contrast to other qualitative approaches, grounded theory emphasizes the detailed coding process, and the numerous fine-tuned distinctions that the researcher makes during the process. Within this category, too, we could not find a satisfying discussion of the meaning of qualitative research.
Defining Qualitative Research
In sum, our analysis shows that some notions reappear in the discussion of qualitative research, such as understanding, interpretation, “getting close” and making distinctions. These notions capture aspects of what we think is “qualitative.” However, a comprehensive definition that is useful and that can further develop the field is lacking, and not even a clear picture of its essential elements appears. In other words no definition emerges from our data, and in our research process we have moved back and forth between our empirical data and the attempt to present a definition. Our concrete strategy, as stated above, is to relate qualitative and quantitative research, or more specifically, qualitative and quantitative work. We use an ideal-typical notion of quantitative research which relies on taken for granted and numbered variables. This means that the data consists of variables on different scales, such as ordinal, but frequently ratio and absolute scales, and the representation of the numbers to the variables, i.e. the justification of the assignment of numbers to object or phenomenon, are not questioned, though the validity may be questioned. In this section we return to the notion of quality and try to clarify it while presenting our contribution.
Broadly, research refers to the activity performed by people trained to obtain knowledge through systematic procedures. Notions such as “objectivity” and “reflexivity,” “systematic,” “theory,” “evidence” and “openness” are here taken for granted in any type of research. Next, building on our empirical analysis we explain the four notions that we have identified as central to qualitative work: distinctions, process, closeness, and improved understanding. In discussing them, ultimately in relation to one another, we make their meaning even more precise. Our idea, in short, is that only when these ideas that we present separately for analytic purposes are brought together can we speak of qualitative research.
Distinctions
We believe that the possibility of making new distinctions is one the defining characteristics of qualitative research. It clearly sets it apart from quantitative analysis which works with taken-for-granted variables, albeit as mentioned, meta-analyses, for example, factor analysis may result in new variables. “Quality” refers essentially to distinctions, as already pointed out by Aristotle. He discusses the term “qualitative” commenting: “By a quality I mean that in virtue of which things are said to be qualified somehow” (Aristotle 1984:14). Quality is about what something is or has, which means that the distinction from its environment is crucial. We see qualitative research as a process in which significant new distinctions are made to the scholarly community; to make distinctions is a key aspect of obtaining new knowledge; a point, as we will see, that also has implications for “quantitative research.” The notion of being “significant” is paramount. New distinctions by themselves are not enough; just adding concepts only increases complexity without furthering our knowledge. The significance of new distinctions is judged against the communal knowledge of the research community. To enable this discussion and judgements central elements of rational discussion are required (cf. Habermas [1981] 1987 ; Davidsson [ 1988 ] 2001) to identify what is new and relevant scientific knowledge. Relatedly, Ragin alludes to the idea of new and useful knowledge at a more concrete level: “Qualitative methods are appropriate for in-depth examination of cases because they aid the identification of key features of cases. Most qualitative methods enhance data” (1994:79). When Becker ( 1963 ) studied deviant behavior and investigated how people became marihuana smokers, he made distinctions between the ways in which people learned how to smoke. This is a classic example of how the strategy of “getting close” to the material, for example the text, people or pictures that are subject to analysis, may enable researchers to obtain deeper insight and new knowledge by making distinctions – in this instance on the initial notion of learning how to smoke. Others have stressed the making of distinctions in relation to coding or theorizing. Emerson et al. ( 1995 ), for example, hold that “qualitative coding is a way of opening up avenues of inquiry,” meaning that the researcher identifies and develops concepts and analytic insights through close examination of and reflection on data (Emerson et al. 1995 :151). Goodwin and Horowitz highlight making distinctions in relation to theory-building writing: “Close engagement with their cases typically requires qualitative researchers to adapt existing theories or to make new conceptual distinctions or theoretical arguments to accommodate new data” ( 2002 : 37). In the ideal-typical quantitative research only existing and so to speak, given, variables would be used. If this is the case no new distinction are made. But, would not also many “quantitative” researchers make new distinctions?
Process does not merely suggest that research takes time. It mainly implies that qualitative new knowledge results from a process that involves several phases, and above all iteration. Qualitative research is about oscillation between theory and evidence, analysis and generating material, between first- and second -order constructs (Schütz 1962 :59), between getting in contact with something, finding sources, becoming deeply familiar with a topic, and then distilling and communicating some of its essential features. The main point is that the categories that the researcher uses, and perhaps takes for granted at the beginning of the research process, usually undergo qualitative changes resulting from what is found. Becker describes how he tested hypotheses and let the jargon of the users develop into theoretical concepts. This happens over time while the study is being conducted, exemplifying what we mean by process.
In the research process, a pilot-study may be used to get a first glance of, for example, the field, how to approach it, and what methods can be used, after which the method and theory are chosen or refined before the main study begins. Thus, the empirical material is often central from the start of the project and frequently leads to adjustments by the researcher. Likewise, during the main study categories are not fixed; the empirical material is seen in light of the theory used, but it is also given the opportunity to kick back, thereby resisting attempts to apply theoretical straightjackets (Becker 1970 :43). In this process, coding and analysis are interwoven, and thus are often important steps for getting closer to the phenomenon and deciding what to focus on next. Becker began his research by interviewing musicians close to him, then asking them to refer him to other musicians, and later on doubling his original sample of about 25 to include individuals in other professions (Becker 1973:46). Additionally, he made use of some participant observation, documents, and interviews with opiate users made available to him by colleagues. As his inductive theory of deviance evolved, Becker expanded his sample in order to fine tune it, and test the accuracy and generality of his hypotheses. In addition, he introduced a negative case and discussed the null hypothesis ( 1963 :44). His phasic career model is thus based on a research design that embraces processual work. Typically, process means to move between “theory” and “material” but also to deal with negative cases, and Becker ( 1998 ) describes how discovering these negative cases impacted his research design and ultimately its findings.
Obviously, all research is process-oriented to some degree. The point is that the ideal-typical quantitative process does not imply change of the data, and iteration between data, evidence, hypotheses, empirical work, and theory. The data, quantified variables, are, in most cases fixed. Merging of data, which of course can be done in a quantitative research process, does not mean new data. New hypotheses are frequently tested, but the “raw data is often the “the same.” Obviously, over time new datasets are made available and put into use.
Another characteristic that is emphasized in our sample is that qualitative researchers – and in particular ethnographers – can, or as Goffman put it, ought to ( 1989 ), get closer to the phenomenon being studied and their data than quantitative researchers (for example, Silverman 2009 :85). Put differently, essentially because of their methods qualitative researchers get into direct close contact with those being investigated and/or the material, such as texts, being analyzed. Becker started out his interview study, as we noted, by talking to those he knew in the field of music to get closer to the phenomenon he was studying. By conducting interviews he got even closer. Had he done more observations, he would undoubtedly have got even closer to the field.
Additionally, ethnographers’ design enables researchers to follow the field over time, and the research they do is almost by definition longitudinal, though the time in the field is studied obviously differs between studies. The general characteristic of closeness over time maximizes the chances of unexpected events, new data (related, for example, to archival research as additional sources, and for ethnography for situations not necessarily previously thought of as instrumental – what Mannay and Morgan ( 2015 ) term the “waiting field”), serendipity (Merton and Barber 2004 ; Åkerström 2013 ), and possibly reactivity, as well as the opportunity to observe disrupted patterns that translate into exemplars of negative cases. Two classic examples of this are Becker’s finding of what medical students call “crocks” (Becker et al. 1961 :317), and Geertz’s ( 1973 ) study of “deep play” in Balinese society.
By getting and staying so close to their data – be it pictures, text or humans interacting (Becker was himself a musician) – for a long time, as the research progressively focuses, qualitative researchers are prompted to continually test their hunches, presuppositions and hypotheses. They test them against a reality that often (but certainly not always), and practically, as well as metaphorically, talks back, whether by validating them, or disqualifying their premises – correctly, as well as incorrectly (Fine 2003 ; Becker 1970 ). This testing nonetheless often leads to new directions for the research. Becker, for example, says that he was initially reading psychological theories, but when facing the data he develops a theory that looks at, you may say, everything but psychological dispositions to explain the use of marihuana. Especially researchers involved with ethnographic methods have a fairly unique opportunity to dig up and then test (in a circular, continuous and temporal way) new research questions and findings as the research progresses, and thereby to derive previously unimagined and uncharted distinctions by getting closer to the phenomenon under study.
Let us stress that getting close is by no means restricted to ethnography. The notion of hermeneutic circle and hermeneutics as a general way of understanding implies that we must get close to the details in order to get the big picture. This also means that qualitative researchers can literally also make use of details of pictures as evidence (cf. Harper 2002). Thus, researchers may get closer both when generating the material or when analyzing it.
Quantitative research, we maintain, in the ideal-typical representation cannot get closer to the data. The data is essentially numbers in tables making up the variables (Franzosi 2016 :138). The data may originally have been “qualitative,” but once reduced to numbers there can only be a type of “hermeneutics” about what the number may stand for. The numbers themselves, however, are non-ambiguous. Thus, in quantitative research, interpretation, if done, is not about the data itself—the numbers—but what the numbers stand for. It follows that the interpretation is essentially done in a more “speculative” mode without direct empirical evidence (cf. Becker 2017 ).
Improved Understanding
While distinction, process and getting closer refer to the qualitative work of the researcher, improved understanding refers to its conditions and outcome of this work. Understanding cuts deeper than explanation, which to some may mean a causally verified correlation between variables. The notion of explanation presupposes the notion of understanding since explanation does not include an idea of how knowledge is gained (Manicas 2006 : 15). Understanding, we argue, is the core concept of what we call the outcome of the process when research has made use of all the other elements that were integrated in the research. Understanding, then, has a special status in qualitative research since it refers both to the conditions of knowledge and the outcome of the process. Understanding can to some extent be seen as the condition of explanation and occurs in a process of interpretation, which naturally refers to meaning (Gadamer 1990 ). It is fundamentally connected to knowing, and to the knowing of how to do things (Heidegger [1927] 2001 ). Conceptually the term hermeneutics is used to account for this process. Heidegger ties hermeneutics to human being and not possible to separate from the understanding of being ( 1988 ). Here we use it in a broader sense, and more connected to method in general (cf. Seiffert 1992 ). The abovementioned aspects – for example, “objectivity” and “reflexivity” – of the approach are conditions of scientific understanding. Understanding is the result of a circular process and means that the parts are understood in light of the whole, and vice versa. Understanding presupposes pre-understanding, or in other words, some knowledge of the phenomenon studied. The pre-understanding, even in the form of prejudices, are in qualitative research process, which we see as iterative, questioned, which gradually or suddenly change due to the iteration of data, evidence and concepts. However, qualitative research generates understanding in the iterative process when the researcher gets closer to the data, e.g., by going back and forth between field and analysis in a process that generates new data that changes the evidence, and, ultimately, the findings. Questioning, to ask questions, and put what one assumes—prejudices and presumption—in question, is central to understand something (Heidegger [1927] 2001 ; Gadamer 1990 :368–384). We propose that this iterative process in which the process of understanding occurs is characteristic of qualitative research.
Improved understanding means that we obtain scientific knowledge of something that we as a scholarly community did not know before, or that we get to know something better. It means that we understand more about how parts are related to one another, and to other things we already understand (see also Fine and Hallett 2014 ). Understanding is an important condition for qualitative research. It is not enough to identify correlations, make distinctions, and work in a process in which one gets close to the field or phenomena. Understanding is accomplished when the elements are integrated in an iterative process.
It is, moreover, possible to understand many things, and researchers, just like children, may come to understand new things every day as they engage with the world. This subjective condition of understanding – namely, that a person gains a better understanding of something –is easily met. To be qualified as “scientific,” the understanding must be general and useful to many; it must be public. But even this generally accessible understanding is not enough in order to speak of “scientific understanding.” Though we as a collective can increase understanding of everything in virtually all potential directions as a result also of qualitative work, we refrain from this “objective” way of understanding, which has no means of discriminating between what we gain in understanding. Scientific understanding means that it is deemed relevant from the scientific horizon (compare Schütz 1962 : 35–38, 46, 63), and that it rests on the pre-understanding that the scientists have and must have in order to understand. In other words, the understanding gained must be deemed useful by other researchers, so that they can build on it. We thus see understanding from a pragmatic, rather than a subjective or objective perspective. Improved understanding is related to the question(s) at hand. Understanding, in order to represent an improvement, must be an improvement in relation to the existing body of knowledge of the scientific community (James [ 1907 ] 1955). Scientific understanding is, by definition, collective, as expressed in Weber’s famous note on objectivity, namely that scientific work aims at truths “which … can claim, even for a Chinese, the validity appropriate to an empirical analysis” ([1904] 1949 :59). By qualifying “improved understanding” we argue that it is a general defining characteristic of qualitative research. Becker‘s ( 1966 ) study and other research of deviant behavior increased our understanding of the social learning processes of how individuals start a behavior. And it also added new knowledge about the labeling of deviant behavior as a social process. Few studies, of course, make the same large contribution as Becker’s, but are nonetheless qualitative research.
Understanding in the phenomenological sense, which is a hallmark of qualitative research, we argue, requires meaning and this meaning is derived from the context, and above all the data being analyzed. The ideal-typical quantitative research operates with given variables with different numbers. This type of material is not enough to establish meaning at the level that truly justifies understanding. In other words, many social science explanations offer ideas about correlations or even causal relations, but this does not mean that the meaning at the level of the data analyzed, is understood. This leads us to say that there are indeed many explanations that meet the criteria of understanding, for example the explanation of how one becomes a marihuana smoker presented by Becker. However, we may also understand a phenomenon without explaining it, and we may have potential explanations, or better correlations, that are not really understood.
We may speak more generally of quantitative research and its data to clarify what we see as an important distinction. The “raw data” that quantitative research—as an idealtypical activity, refers to is not available for further analysis; the numbers, once created, are not to be questioned (Franzosi 2016 : 138). If the researcher is to do “more” or “change” something, this will be done by conjectures based on theoretical knowledge or based on the researcher’s lifeworld. Both qualitative and quantitative research is based on the lifeworld, and all researchers use prejudices and pre-understanding in the research process. This idea is present in the works of Heidegger ( 2001 ) and Heisenberg (cited in Franzosi 2010 :619). Qualitative research, as we argued, involves the interaction and questioning of concepts (theory), data, and evidence.
Ragin ( 2004 :22) points out that “a good definition of qualitative research should be inclusive and should emphasize its key strengths and features, not what it lacks (for example, the use of sophisticated quantitative techniques).” We define qualitative research as an iterative process in which improved understanding to the scientific community is achieved by making new significant distinctions resulting from getting closer to the phenomenon studied. Qualitative research, as defined here, is consequently a combination of two criteria: (i) how to do things –namely, generating and analyzing empirical material, in an iterative process in which one gets closer by making distinctions, and (ii) the outcome –improved understanding novel to the scholarly community. Is our definition applicable to our own study? In this study we have closely read the empirical material that we generated, and the novel distinction of the notion “qualitative research” is the outcome of an iterative process in which both deduction and induction were involved, in which we identified the categories that we analyzed. We thus claim to meet the first criteria, “how to do things.” The second criteria cannot be judged but in a partial way by us, namely that the “outcome” —in concrete form the definition-improves our understanding to others in the scientific community.
We have defined qualitative research, or qualitative scientific work, in relation to quantitative scientific work. Given this definition, qualitative research is about questioning the pre-given (taken for granted) variables, but it is thus also about making new distinctions of any type of phenomenon, for example, by coining new concepts, including the identification of new variables. This process, as we have discussed, is carried out in relation to empirical material, previous research, and thus in relation to theory. Theory and previous research cannot be escaped or bracketed. According to hermeneutic principles all scientific work is grounded in the lifeworld, and as social scientists we can thus never fully bracket our pre-understanding.
We have proposed that quantitative research, as an idealtype, is concerned with pre-determined variables (Small 2008 ). Variables are epistemically fixed, but can vary in terms of dimensions, such as frequency or number. Age is an example; as a variable it can take on different numbers. In relation to quantitative research, qualitative research does not reduce its material to number and variables. If this is done the process of comes to a halt, the researcher gets more distanced from her data, and it makes it no longer possible to make new distinctions that increase our understanding. We have above discussed the components of our definition in relation to quantitative research. Our conclusion is that in the research that is called quantitative there are frequent and necessary qualitative elements.
Further, comparative empirical research on researchers primarily working with ”quantitative” approaches and those working with ”qualitative” approaches, we propose, would perhaps show that there are many similarities in practices of these two approaches. This is not to deny dissimilarities, or the different epistemic and ontic presuppositions that may be more or less strongly associated with the two different strands (see Goertz and Mahoney 2012 ). Our point is nonetheless that prejudices and preconceptions about researchers are unproductive, and that as other researchers have argued, differences may be exaggerated (e.g., Becker 1996 : 53, 2017 ; Marchel and Owens 2007 :303; Ragin 1994 ), and that a qualitative dimension is present in both kinds of work.
Several things follow from our findings. The most important result is the relation to quantitative research. In our analysis we have separated qualitative research from quantitative research. The point is not to label individual researchers, methods, projects, or works as either “quantitative” or “qualitative.” By analyzing, i.e., taking apart, the notions of quantitative and qualitative, we hope to have shown the elements of qualitative research. Our definition captures the elements, and how they, when combined in practice, generate understanding. As many of the quotations we have used suggest, one conclusion of our study holds that qualitative approaches are not inherently connected with a specific method. Put differently, none of the methods that are frequently labelled “qualitative,” such as interviews or participant observation, are inherently “qualitative.” What matters, given our definition, is whether one works qualitatively or quantitatively in the research process, until the results are produced. Consequently, our analysis also suggests that those researchers working with what in the literature and in jargon is often called “quantitative research” are almost bound to make use of what we have identified as qualitative elements in any research project. Our findings also suggest that many” quantitative” researchers, at least to some extent, are engaged with qualitative work, such as when research questions are developed, variables are constructed and combined, and hypotheses are formulated. Furthermore, a research project may hover between “qualitative” and “quantitative” or start out as “qualitative” and later move into a “quantitative” (a distinct strategy that is not similar to “mixed methods” or just simply combining induction and deduction). More generally speaking, the categories of “qualitative” and “quantitative,” unfortunately, often cover up practices, and it may lead to “camps” of researchers opposing one another. For example, regardless of the researcher is primarily oriented to “quantitative” or “qualitative” research, the role of theory is neglected (cf. Swedberg 2017 ). Our results open up for an interaction not characterized by differences, but by different emphasis, and similarities.
Let us take two examples to briefly indicate how qualitative elements can fruitfully be combined with quantitative. Franzosi ( 2010 ) has discussed the relations between quantitative and qualitative approaches, and more specifically the relation between words and numbers. He analyzes texts and argues that scientific meaning cannot be reduced to numbers. Put differently, the meaning of the numbers is to be understood by what is taken for granted, and what is part of the lifeworld (Schütz 1962 ). Franzosi shows how one can go about using qualitative and quantitative methods and data to address scientific questions analyzing violence in Italy at the time when fascism was rising (1919–1922). Aspers ( 2006 ) studied the meaning of fashion photographers. He uses an empirical phenomenological approach, and establishes meaning at the level of actors. In a second step this meaning, and the different ideal-typical photographers constructed as a result of participant observation and interviews, are tested using quantitative data from a database; in the first phase to verify the different ideal-types, in the second phase to use these types to establish new knowledge about the types. In both of these cases—and more examples can be found—authors move from qualitative data and try to keep the meaning established when using the quantitative data.
A second main result of our study is that a definition, and we provided one, offers a way for research to clarify, and even evaluate, what is done. Hence, our definition can guide researchers and students, informing them on how to think about concrete research problems they face, and to show what it means to get closer in a process in which new distinctions are made. The definition can also be used to evaluate the results, given that it is a standard of evaluation (cf. Hammersley 2007 ), to see whether new distinctions are made and whether this improves our understanding of what is researched, in addition to the evaluation of how the research was conducted. By making what is qualitative research explicit it becomes easier to communicate findings, and it is thereby much harder to fly under the radar with substandard research since there are standards of evaluation which make it easier to separate “good” from “not so good” qualitative research.
To conclude, our analysis, which ends with a definition of qualitative research can thus both address the “internal” issues of what is qualitative research, and the “external” critiques that make it harder to do qualitative research, to which both pressure from quantitative methods and general changes in society contribute.
Åkerström, Malin. 2013. Curiosity and serendipity in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology Review 9 (2): 10–18.
Google Scholar
Alford, Robert R. 1998. The craft of inquiry. Theories, methods, evidence . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alvesson, Mats, and Dan Kärreman. 2011. Qualitative research and theory development. Mystery as method . London: SAGE Publications.
Book Google Scholar
Aspers, Patrik. 2006. Markets in Fashion, A Phenomenological Approach. London Routledge.
Atkinson, Paul. 2005. Qualitative research. Unity and diversity. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6 (3): 1–15.
Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance . New York: The Free Press.
Becker, Howard S. 1966. Whose side are we on? Social Problems 14 (3): 239–247.
Article Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1970. Sociological work. Method and substance . New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Becker, Howard S. 1996. The epistemology of qualitative research. In Ethnography and human development. Context and meaning in social inquiry , ed. Jessor Richard, Colby Anne, and Richard A. Shweder, 53–71. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the trade. How to think about your research while you're doing it . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S. 2017. Evidence . Chigaco: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard, Blanche Geer, Everett Hughes, and Anselm Strauss. 1961. Boys in White, student culture in medical school . New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Berezin, Mabel. 2014. How do we know what we mean? Epistemological dilemmas in cultural sociology. Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 141–151.
Best, Joel. 2004. Defining qualitative research. In Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research , eds . Charles, Ragin, Joanne, Nagel, and Patricia White, 53-54. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04219/nsf04219.pdf .
Biernacki, Richard. 2014. Humanist interpretation versus coding text samples. Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 173–188.
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method . Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brady, Henry, David Collier, and Jason Seawright. 2004. Refocusing the discussion of methodology. In Rethinking social inquiry. Diverse tools, shared standards , ed. Brady Henry and Collier David, 3–22. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Brown, Allison P. 2010. Qualitative method and compromise in applied social research. Qualitative Research 10 (2): 229–248.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory . London: Sage.
Corte, Ugo, and Katherine Irwin. 2017. “The Form and Flow of Teaching Ethnographic Knowledge: Hands-on Approaches for Learning Epistemology” Teaching Sociology 45(3): 209-219.
Creswell, John W. 2009. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches . 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Davidsson, David. 1988. 2001. The myth of the subjective. In Subjective, intersubjective, objective , ed. David Davidsson, 39–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Denzin, Norman K. 1970. The research act: A theoretical introduction to Ssociological methods . Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company Publishers.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2003. Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials , ed. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1–45. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2005. Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research , ed. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1–32. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Emerson, Robert M., ed. 1988. Contemporary field research. A collection of readings . Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Esterberg, Kristin G. 2002. Qualitative methods in social research . Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Fine, Gary Alan. 1995. Review of “handbook of qualitative research.” Contemporary Sociology 24 (3): 416–418.
Fine, Gary Alan. 2003. “ Toward a Peopled Ethnography: Developing Theory from Group Life.” Ethnography . 4(1):41-60.
Fine, Gary Alan, and Black Hawk Hancock. 2017. The new ethnographer at work. Qualitative Research 17 (2): 260–268.
Fine, Gary Alan, and Timothy Hallett. 2014. Stranger and stranger: Creating theory through ethnographic distance and authority. Journal of Organizational Ethnography 3 (2): 188–203.
Flick, Uwe. 2002. Qualitative research. State of the art. Social Science Information 41 (1): 5–24.
Flick, Uwe. 2007. Designing qualitative research . London: SAGE Publications.
Frankfort-Nachmias, Chava, and David Nachmias. 1996. Research methods in the social sciences . 5th ed. London: Edward Arnold.
Franzosi, Roberto. 2010. Sociology, narrative, and the quality versus quantity debate (Goethe versus Newton): Can computer-assisted story grammars help us understand the rise of Italian fascism (1919- 1922)? Theory and Society 39 (6): 593–629.
Franzosi, Roberto. 2016. From method and measurement to narrative and number. International journal of social research methodology 19 (1): 137–141.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1990. Wahrheit und Methode, Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik . Band 1, Hermeneutik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Gans, Herbert. 1999. Participant Observation in an Age of “Ethnography”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28 (5): 540–548.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures . New York: Basic Books.
Gilbert, Nigel. 2009. Researching social life . 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Glaeser, Andreas. 2014. Hermeneutic institutionalism: Towards a new synthesis. Qualitative Sociology 37: 207–241.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. [1967] 2010. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine.
Goertz, Gary, and James Mahoney. 2012. A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1989. On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18 (2): 123–132.
Goodwin, Jeff, and Ruth Horowitz. 2002. Introduction. The methodological strengths and dilemmas of qualitative sociology. Qualitative Sociology 25 (1): 33–47.
Habermas, Jürgen. [1981] 1987. The theory of communicative action . Oxford: Polity Press.
Hammersley, Martyn. 2007. The issue of quality in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30 (3): 287–305.
Hammersley, Martyn. 2013. What is qualitative research? Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hammersley, Martyn. 2018. What is ethnography? Can it survive should it? Ethnography and Education 13 (1): 1–17.
Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography. Principles in practice . London: Tavistock Publications.
Heidegger, Martin. [1927] 2001. Sein und Zeit . Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Heidegger, Martin. 1988. 1923. Ontologie. Hermeneutik der Faktizität, Gesamtausgabe II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919-1944, Band 63, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Hempel, Carl G. 1966. Philosophy of the natural sciences . Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hood, Jane C. 2006. Teaching against the text. The case of qualitative methods. Teaching Sociology 34 (3): 207–223.
James, William. 1907. 1955. Pragmatism . New York: Meredian Books.
Jovanović, Gordana. 2011. Toward a social history of qualitative research. History of the Human Sciences 24 (2): 1–27.
Kalof, Linda, Amy Dan, and Thomas Dietz. 2008. Essentials of social research . London: Open University Press.
Katz, Jack. 2015. Situational evidence: Strategies for causal reasoning from observational field notes. Sociological Methods & Research 44 (1): 108–144.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, S. Sidney, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry. In Scientific inference in qualitative research . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chapter Google Scholar
Lamont, Michelle. 2004. Evaluating qualitative research: Some empirical findings and an agenda. In Report from workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research , ed. M. Lamont and P. White, 91–95. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Lamont, Michèle, and Ann Swidler. 2014. Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, and Alan Barton. 1982. Some functions of qualitative analysis in social research. In The varied sociology of Paul Lazarsfeld , ed. Patricia Kendall, 239–285. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lichterman, Paul, and Isaac Reed I (2014), Theory and Contrastive Explanation in Ethnography. Sociological methods and research. Prepublished 27 October 2014; https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114554458 .
Lofland, John, and Lyn Lofland. 1995. Analyzing social settings. A guide to qualitative observation and analysis . 3rd ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Lofland, John, David A. Snow, Leon Anderson, and Lyn H. Lofland. 2006. Analyzing social settings. A guide to qualitative observation and analysis . 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Long, Adrew F., and Mary Godfrey. 2004. An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7 (2): 181–196.
Lundberg, George. 1951. Social research: A study in methods of gathering data . New York: Longmans, Green and Co..
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native Enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea . London: Routledge.
Manicas, Peter. 2006. A realist philosophy of science: Explanation and understanding . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marchel, Carol, and Stephanie Owens. 2007. Qualitative research in psychology. Could William James get a job? History of Psychology 10 (4): 301–324.
McIntyre, Lisa J. 2005. Need to know. Social science research methods . Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Merton, Robert K., and Elinor Barber. 2004. The travels and adventures of serendipity. A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mannay, Dawn, and Melanie Morgan. 2015. Doing ethnography or applying a qualitative technique? Reflections from the ‘waiting field‘. Qualitative Research 15 (2): 166–182.
Neuman, Lawrence W. 2007. Basics of social research. Qualitative and quantitative approaches . 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
Ragin, Charles C. 1994. Constructing social research. The unity and diversity of method . Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 2004. Introduction to session 1: Defining qualitative research. In Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research , 22, ed. Charles C. Ragin, Joane Nagel, Patricia White. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04219/nsf04219.pdf
Rawls, Anne. 2018. The Wartime narrative in US sociology, 1940–7: Stigmatizing qualitative sociology in the name of ‘science,’ European Journal of Social Theory (Online first).
Schütz, Alfred. 1962. Collected papers I: The problem of social reality . The Hague: Nijhoff.
Seiffert, Helmut. 1992. Einführung in die Hermeneutik . Tübingen: Franke.
Silverman, David. 2005. Doing qualitative research. A practical handbook . 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Silverman, David. 2009. A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research . London: SAGE Publications.
Silverman, David. 2013. What counts as qualitative research? Some cautionary comments. Qualitative Sociology Review 9 (2): 48–55.
Small, Mario L. 2009. “How many cases do I need?” on science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10 (1): 5–38.
Small, Mario L 2008. Lost in translation: How not to make qualitative research more scientific. In Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research, ed in Michelle Lamont, and Patricia White, 165–171. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Snow, David A., and Leon Anderson. 1993. Down on their luck: A study of homeless street people . Berkeley: University of California Press.
Snow, David A., and Calvin Morrill. 1995. New ethnographies: Review symposium: A revolutionary handbook or a handbook for revolution? Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24 (3): 341–349.
Strauss, Anselm L. 2003. Qualitative analysis for social scientists . 14th ed. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliette M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Swedberg, Richard. 2017. Theorizing in sociological research: A new perspective, a new departure? Annual Review of Sociology 43: 189–206.
Swedberg, Richard. 1990. The new 'Battle of Methods'. Challenge January–February 3 (1): 33–38.
Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. 2012. Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186.
Trier-Bieniek, Adrienne. 2012. Framing the telephone interview as a participant-centred tool for qualitative research. A methodological discussion. Qualitative Research 12 (6): 630–644.
Valsiner, Jaan. 2000. Data as representations. Contextualizing qualitative and quantitative research strategies. Social Science Information 39 (1): 99–113.
Weber, Max. 1904. 1949. Objectivity’ in social Science and social policy. Ed. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, 49–112. New York: The Free Press.
Download references
Acknowledgements
Financial Support for this research is given by the European Research Council, CEV (263699). The authors are grateful to Susann Krieglsteiner for assistance in collecting the data. The paper has benefitted from the many useful comments by the three reviewers and the editor, comments by members of the Uppsala Laboratory of Economic Sociology, as well as Jukka Gronow, Sebastian Kohl, Marcin Serafin, Richard Swedberg, Anders Vassenden and Turid Rødne.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Patrik Aspers
Seminar for Sociology, Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Department of Media and Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Patrik Aspers .
Additional information
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Aspers, P., Corte, U. What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qual Sociol 42 , 139–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Download citation
Published : 27 February 2019
Issue Date : 01 June 2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Qualitative research
- Epistemology
- Philosophy of science
- Phenomenology
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
![](http://blog10.website/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research. Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research, which involves collecting and ...
Qualitative Research. Qualitative research is a type of research methodology that focuses on exploring and understanding people's beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences through the collection and analysis of non-numerical data. It seeks to answer research questions through the examination of subjective data, such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and textual analysis.
Qualitative research is a type of research that explores and provides deeper insights into real-world problems.[1] Instead of collecting numerical data points or intervening or introducing treatments just like in quantitative research, qualitative research helps generate hypothenar to further investigate and understand quantitative data.
Qualitative research is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data. The findings of qualitative research are expressed in words and help in understanding individuals' subjective perceptions about an event, condition, or subject. This type of research is exploratory and is used to generate hypotheses or theories ...
Qualitative research is a type of research that aims to gather and analyse non-numerical (descriptive) data in order to gain an understanding of individuals' social reality, including understanding their attitudes, beliefs, and motivation. This type of research typically involves in-depth interviews, focus groups, or observations in order to ...
Qualitative research is defined as an exploratory method that aims to understand complex phenomena, often within their natural settings, by examining subjective experiences, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Learn more about qualitative research methods, types, examples and best practices.
Qualitative research is the naturalistic study of social meanings and processes, using interviews, observations, and the analysis of texts and images. In contrast to quantitative researchers, whose statistical methods enable broad generalizations about populations (for example, comparisons of the percentages of U.S. demographic groups who vote in particular ways), qualitative researchers use ...
Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research, which involves collecting and analysing numerical data for statistical analysis. Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, and history. Qualitative research question examples
Qualitative research is an excellent way to gain insight into real-world problems. This research type can explain various aspects of individuals in a target group, such as their traits, behaviors, and motivations. Qualitative research involves gathering and evaluating non-numerical information to comprehend concepts, perspectives, and experiences.
Abstract. This guide explains the focus, rigor, and relevance of qualitative research, highlighting its role in dissecting complex social phenomena and providing in-depth, human-centered insights. The guide also examines the rationale for employing qualitative methods, underscoring their critical importance. An exploration of the methodology ...
Qualitative research is multimethod in focus, involving an interpretative, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them.
Types of Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Qualitative research employs different data analysis methods, each suited to specific research goals: Thematic Analysis: Identifies recurring themes or concepts within data. Content Analysis: Systematically categorizes and quantifies text or media content.
"Qualitative research is a type of research that explores and provides deeper insights into real-world problems. Instead of collecting numerical data points or intervene or introduce treatments just like in quantitative research, qualitative research helps generate hypotheses as well as further investigate and understand quantitative data." ...
Qualitative research is a process of naturalistic inquiry that seeks an in-depth understanding of social phenomena within their natural setting. It focuses on the "why" rather than the "what" of social phenomena and relies on the direct experiences of human beings as meaning-making agents in their every day lives.
Let's look at each of the six types of qualitative research methods. 1. Phenomenological method. The phenomenological approach explores the experiences of a specific phenomenon (observable fact or event) in a person or group. These are "lived experiences.".
The main difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the type of data they collect and analyze. Quantitative data is information about quantities, and therefore numbers, and qualitative data is descriptive, and regards phenomenon which can be observed but not measured, such as language. Quantitative research collects numerical ...
INTRODUCTION. Qualitative research methods refer to techniques of investigation that rely on nonstatistical and nonnumerical methods of data collection, analysis, and evidence production. Qualitative research techniques provide a lens for learning about nonquantifiable phenomena such as people's experiences, languages, histories, and cultures.
8 types of qualitative research. There are several types of qualitative research, including: 1. Action research. In action research, the researcher participates in a situation and collects data on it. The researcher uses this data to analyze the situation and collects more data if they want to adjust the scope of the study or its results ...
Qualitative research is a type of research that explores and provides deeper insights into real-world problems. Instead of collecting numerical data points or intervening or introducing treatments just like in quantitative research, qualitative research helps generate hypothenar to further investigate and understand quantitative data. ...
Besides the types of data used, a core difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the idea of control and replication. "Qualitative is less subject to control (as in lab studies) and, therefore, less statistically measurable than quantitative approaches," says King.
Types of qualitative research to explore social behavior or understand interactions within specific contexts include interviews, focus groups, observations and surveys. These identify concepts and relationships that aren't easily observed through quantitative methods. Figuring out what to explore through qualitative research is the first step ...
Qualitative research is one type of exploratory market research methodology based on semi-structured or unstructured data collection and a small sample of participants. The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research is similar to the difference between exploratory and conclusive research. In Exploratory research, we define our ...
Summary: This article delves into qualitative and quantitative data, defining each type and highlighting their key differences. It discusses when to use each data type, the benefits of integrating both, and the challenges researchers face. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effective research design and achieving comprehensive insights.
Qualitative methods are used across all types of research—from consumer behavior to education, healthcare, behavioral science, and everywhere in between! At its core, qualitative research is exploratory—rather than coming up with a hypothesis and gathering numerical data to support it, qualitative research begins with open-ended questions.
Qualitative and quantitative research tools. From the nuanced, thematic exploration enabled by tools like NVivo and ATLAS.ti, to the statistical precision of SPSS and R for quantitative analysis, each suite of data analysis tools offers tailored functionalities that cater to the distinct natures of different data types. Qualitative research ...
For qualitative research, using the standards will increase the methodological integrity of research. Jars -Quant should be used in research where findings are reported numerically (quantitative research). Jars -Qual should be used in research where findings are reported using nonnumerical descriptive data (qualitative research).
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent type of cancer among women and the most common cancer diagnosis for all the population in the United States. Early screening and treatment for BC have improved the prognosis for breast cancer survivors (BCSs) and increased survival rate. Current evidence showed insufficient data related to BCSs' post-treatment symptoms, coping issues, and availability ...
The present research used a qualitative content analysis and was based on Pender's HPM. The data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 T2D patients using a purposive sampling in Bandar Abbas, southern Iran.
What is qualitative research? If we look for a precise definition of qualitative research, and specifically for one that addresses its distinctive feature of being "qualitative," the literature is meager. In this article we systematically search, identify and analyze a sample of 89 sources using or attempting to define the term "qualitative." Then, drawing on ideas we find scattered ...
Background: Care continuity by a dedicated, well-trained primary care physician (PCP) has shown to improve health outcomes of patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In Singapore's fee-for-service primary care system, patients can choose to consult any PCP in either a public (polyclinic), private (General Practitioners/ GP), or both types of clinics, resulting in potential fragmented ...