(18–30 years)
(177)
100
Selfie Feedback.
Body dissatisfaction.
Drive for thinness.
Bulimia.
Body monitoring.
Selfie-feedback received through external opinions or assessments increased the likelihood of body dissatisfaction and the drive for thinness through indirect influence. This effect did not extend to bulimic tendencies.
Australia
C
Young adult
(18–29 years)
(259)
100
Use of SM.
Selfie Activities.
Internalization of the thin ideal.
Body Satisfaction.
Self-objectification.
EDs
Greater participation in photographic activities on Facebook was associated with greater internalization and monitoring of the body ideal. In contrast, Facebook's general use was not associated with body monitoring.
USA
C
L
Adolescents
(237)
100
Use of SM.
ED symptoms.
Peer-comparison, rather than with the media, was more relevant to body image and EDs. The use of SM predicted peer competition 6 months later, suggesting possible indirect effects for SM.
USA
C
College students
(185)
100
Appearance-related comparisons on Instagram.
Intrasexual competitiveness between classmates.
Drive for thinness.
Body dissatisfaction.
Using Instagram can be potentially harmful to people who often compare themselves to others. A positive relationship between intrasexual competitiveness and physical comparisons on Instagram was found.
USA
C
College students (892)
100
Safety-seeking in SM.
Frequency of use of SM.
Body image.
EDs
Black women reported less body dissatisfaction, fewer possible EDs, and less use of Facebook than White women. The increased use of Facebook was associated with more body dissatisfaction (not with EDs). A greater search for self-confidence through SM predicted more body dissatisfaction and EDs.
USA
C
L
University students
(185)
78
Comments on Facebook.
Status updates.
EDs
Seeking and receiving negative comments through SM increased the risk of ED-related attitudes.
Korea
E
Women = 33.30 years
(141)
100
Feelings of envy on SM.
Parasocial interaction.
Friendship on Instagram.
Self-esteem.
Perfectionism.
Scale of anorexia / bulimia.
Images of “foodporn”.
Body Mass Index (BMI).
Body shape (fat/thin) and popularity (popular/unpopular) of a diner referent on Instagram affects the intention to eat compared to one's peers, as well as moderating effects on users' self-esteem, BMI, perfectionism, anorexia, and bulimia nervosa.
Envy was a mediating variable.
Envy also mediated the effects of body shape and popularity of a foodie Instragramer on the parasocial interaction of peer users with the foodie and the intention to establish an Instagram-based friendship.
Thailand
C
High school students
(620)
60.3
Behavior and use of media and the Internet.
Body image.
Drive for Muscularity Scale
Self-esteem.
EDs
Obesity behaviors.
The time spent on SM related to self-image and eating attitudes and behaviors was associated with decreased body image satisfaction and problematic eating behaviors.
USA
C
Secondary and Preparatory School Students (103)
100
Internet and Facebook use.
Image exposure on Facebook.
Internalization of the thin ideal.
Appearance comparison.
Satisfaction with weight.
Drive for thinness.
Self-objectification.
High image exposure, but not Facebook's general use, correlated with dissatisfaction with weight, drive for thinness, internalizing the thin ideal, and self-objectification.
Canada
C
Undergraduate students
(383)
70.2
Excessive time on SM
ED-linked behavior.
Body image: appearance and weight.
Lower self-esteem was related to excessive time on SM and restricted eating for men and women. The relationship between excessive time on SM and emotional eating, or mood-related eating was greater in women.
Canada
C
Undergraduate students
(147)
55
SM time/day.
Friends on SM.
Activities on SM.
Body image.
Self-esteem.
EDs
The study demonstrated the influence of excessive use of SM on symptoms and body image concerns, self-esteem, and EDs.
USA
C
Young adults
(18–24years-old)
(637)
100
Gratification and use of SM.
Body monitoring.
Social comparison.
Body dissatisfaction.
EDs.
There is a link between comparisons and EDs, and between body monitoring and disordered eating. Empirical findings support the extension of the sociocultural model of EDs to include the uses and gratifications of SM.
United Kingdom
C
Adolescents (1.087)
100
Exposure to Facebook and MySpace media and networks.
Comments on appearance.
Self-objectification.
Self-monitoring.
Body shame.
EDs
Exposure to magazines and SM was associated with self-objectification. Positive comments related to appearance influenced self-objectification as much as negative comments.
Singapore
D
People diagnosed with ED
(55)
94.5
SM and mobile applications.
EDs on the Internet.
Characteristics of the disorder.
The use of mobile applications was associated with greater severity of the disease. 41.8% of people with EDs felt that the applications helped perpetuate their illness, whereas 32.7% felt that the applications were useful for recovery.
Australia
C
Girls aged 10-12 years
(189)
97.5
Exposure to Facebook and MySpace media and networks.
Concern about body image.
Objectified body.
Drive for thinness.
The time spent on SM was linked to the internalization of the thin ideal, body monitoring, and drive for thinness. Facebook users scored higher in measures of body image concerns.
Australia
C
L
High school students
(438)
100
Use of Facebook.
Body image internalization.
Body surveillance
Drive for Thinness.
Increased participation of Internet users on Facebook over the two years of research was found. Body monitoring prospectively predicted the increase in the number of friends on Facebook.
USA
C
College students
(128)
100
Intensity of Facebook usage.
Use of online chats to lose weight.
EDs
BMI
Depression.
Anxiety, perfectionism, impulsivity, and self-efficacy.
Increased intensity in Facebook usage was associated with decreased ED-linked behavior, whereas both the comparison of physical appearance on SM and online weight-loss chats and conversations were associated with EDs.
The Netherlands
C
Women ( = 22.44 years)
(152)
100
Use of SM.
Selfie behavior.
ED and severity.
BMI
Body dissatisfaction.
Body control.
Body avoidance.
Self-esteem.
No direct link was found between body dissatisfaction and selfie photographs in general. A relationship was found between selfies not posted on SM whose intention was body review: the greater the number of unposted selfies, the greater the severity of the ED symptoms.
. C: Correlational; L: Longitudinal; E: Experimental; D: Descriptive.
From the organization and analysis of the main findings of each of the articles, 5 categories were identified that synthesize the results on the use of SM and ED psychopathologies. The 5 categories identified correspond to: Time spent on SM; Use of and interaction through SM; Sociocultural influence; Gender influence; Self-esteem and satisfaction with body image.
The time spent on SM and the development of ED psychopathologies were strongly related in studies that considered both variables. Authors like Kaewpradub and colleagues (2017) found that the time spent on image-related SM was associated with problematic eating behaviors. Reinforcing this idea, Santarossa and Woodruff (2017) reported that over-use of SM is related to body image concerns, self-esteem, and ED psychopathologies. Tiggemann and Slater (2014) agreed on the relationship between usage time and the internalization of the thin ideal, body monitoring, and drive for thinness. The study by Murray et al. (2016) revealed that lower weight and appearance esteem mediated the relationship between excessive time on SM and restrained eating for males and females. One study indicated that the increased use of Facebook was associated with more body dissatisfaction but not directly with EDs (Howard et al., 2017).
Regarding the daily connection time, Santarossa and Woodruff (2017) found that female participants connected to SM between 3.9 to 4.1 hours daily, and their male counterparts between 2.8 and 2.9 hours. Yellowlees et al. (2019) reported that 98% of the participants used SM accounts, with an average daily usage of 2.52 hours ( SD = 2.34), highlighting the time spent on Facebook, followed by Instagram. The result with a lower daily average on SM (MySpace and Facebook) was 81.31 minutes ( SD = 99.20) (Slater & Tiggemann, 2015).
Tiggemann’s and Slater’s (2017) study included a longitudinal component and found that the number of Facebook profiles increased over a two-year period from 71.7 to 91.3%, as did the connection time, the average number of contacts, and concern for body image. Concerning the drive for thinness, these authors observed that, after its initial measurement ( M = 17.65, SD = 9.32), it increased at the second measurement ( M = 20.51, SD = 9.73). The time spent on SM had stronger correlations with concern for body image than did the general exposure to the Internet, representing a powerful socio-cultural influence among preadolescent girls (Tiggemann & Slater, 2014).
Interaction through comments, photo sharing, and selfies was very relevant for the dissatisfaction with and control of body image. In early papers that addressed the subject, such as that of Tiggemann and Slater (2014), it was observed that 14% of the girls had a MySpace profile and 43% had a Facebook profile. In subsequent studies, three out of four participants (75.1%) reported having a Facebook profile, and 46.3% had a MySpace profile (Slater & Tiggemann, 2015). Authors like Saunders and Eaton (2018) identified new patterns, incorporating SM into their study of Instagram and Snapchat, observing the following results: 15.1% of the participants were Facebook users, 33.6% were Snapchat users, and 51.3% were users of Instagram, which represented the most frequently used platform.
Together with the percentage of SM usage, the type of interaction that occurred on the networks was very relevant in the works analyzed. The total number of friends and specific activities, such as looking at other people's profiles or leaving comments, were directly related to concern for body image, self-esteem, and EDs among adolescents (Santarossa & Woodruff, 2017). The longitudinal study by Tiggemann and Slater (2017) found that body internalization and monitoring predicted an increase in the number of friends. As for presenting images of friends' bodies versus those of famous people, Hendrickse et al. (2017) emphasized the need to differentiate the effects produced, with a greater influence of known peers over celebrities. In this line of argument, Ferguson et al. (2014) found that the comparison between known peers is more relevant for body self-esteem and eating problems among adolescent girls.
Concerning self-objectification indices, in the sense of judging one's body compared to social standards, it was noted that Facebook users have higher self-objectification ( M = 2.17, SD = 12.85) than non-users of this SM ( M = -5.59, SD = 14.62). The authors also reported that people who devoted much of their time on SM to photo sharing were more likely to develop body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness (Meier & Gray, 2014).
The control of body mass index (BMI) associated with following health and physical exercise accounts correlated positively with the internalization of the thin ideal and drive for thinness (Cohen et al., 2017). The study conducted by Butkowski et al. (2019) found that the drive for thinness also correlated with feedback received from selfies and body monitoring. Yellowlees et al. (2019) noted that the relationship between the total number of selfies and EDs was nonsignificant, such that those who posted the most selfies did not report more body dissatisfaction. However, these authors did find that unposted selfies were linked to body dissatisfaction and monitoring.
Concerning the comments received, Hummel and Smith (2015) noted that the search for feedback through comments predicted food restriction when a large number of comments was received. Those who received many comments and those who received negative feedback through SM were more likely to report food restriction at the second period of their longitudinal study. For Slater and Tiggemann (2015), comments on the SM about physique, both positive and negative, were positively related to self-objectification and self-monitoring. Positive comments on appearance ( M = 3.04, SD = 1.35) were received more than negative ones ( M = 1.08, SD = 1.28). In sum, the corpus of scholarly literature reviewed above highlights the importance of including SM-dynamics in research studies on body concern and EDs (Slater & Tiggemann, 2015).
The only study that focused on patients with an ED diagnosis highlighted that significant use of apps and smartphones prolonged or worsened the behavior in the most severe cases of the disease, finding that 41.8% of the diagnosed people felt that the apps helped perpetuate the disease (Tan et al., 2016).
Sociocultural influence has been reaffirmed through the results as one of the determinants of the possible development of ED psychopathologies. The variation and sociocultural representativeness of the different samples varied depending on the article analyzed. However, a predominance of Caucasian samples was observed, as in Walker et al. (2015), a study in which Caucasians accounted for 81.3%; in Cohen et al. (2017) with 77.5%; and in Butkowski et al. (2019), with 60%. The following works were noteworthy for collecting different samples: Ferguson et al. (2014), in which most participants were Hispanic (94.1%), a reflection of the community surrounding the university; the study examining a Western and ethnic sample in Fiji (Becker et al., 2011); and the work that used a racial perspective, where Black women accounted for 48.26% of the sample (Howard et al., 2017).
In the work with the Fijian sample (Becker et al., 2011), not only ethnic issues were considered, but also Western exposure through trips abroad. As for the research that explored the differences between Black and White women, the result suggested less body dissatisfaction and a lower likelihood of EDs in Black women, as well as more frequent use of Facebook among White women seeking greater validation (Howard et al., 2017). Focusing on the Fiji study, ethnic cultural orientation was associated with a lower incidence of EDs, whereas trips abroad were associated with a higher likelihood of EDs (Becker et al., 2011). Concerning Black women, they were observed to experience lower levels of body dissatisfaction and marginally lower levels of EDs than White women (Howard et al., 2017).
Of all the studies reviewed, 68.4% examined exclusively female samples, addressing the impact of SM use on body image and EDs mostly from a female perspective. Although some investigations had male samples, not all of them developed and analyzed gender differences (Hummel & Smith, 2015; Tiggemann & Slater, 2014).
Authors such as Santarossa and Woodruff (2017) argued that the few existing gender differences could be attributed to the use of gender-specific tools when available, for example, the SATAQ-3 female version and the SATAQ-M male version.
On average, male participants used general media for more time but females used the Internet and SM more, as a means of body image-related content, and 61.3% of them sought body-image-related products on SM (Kaewpradub et al., 2017). In the gender analysis, female high school participants reported significant differences in purging behaviors, laxative use, weight loss pills, and excessive exercise (Kaewpradub et al., 2017). However, male high school participants scored significantly higher in behaviors that imply a risk of obesity (Kaewpradub et al., 2017).
Murray et al. (2016) revealed that females had a significantly more contained and emotional diet, poorer self-esteem about their appearance, and a worse perception of their weight, which mediated their overuse of SM. It was also revealed that on the SM, women engage in more social comparison activities, and men tend to use SM to make friends and expand their social network. However, research results show that men's body image and dietary behaviors are also influenced by SM (Murray et al., 2016).
In the study that analyzed a clinical sample (Tan et al., 2016), the participants were mostly women (94.5%). In this sense, the authors state that the small male sample could limit the generalization of this study to male individuals with EDs. Consequently, they established the need for future studies to include more male participants with EDs.
This systematic review shows that, in some studies, problematic use of SM was associated with decreased self-esteem and satisfaction, alteration of body image, and a possible increase of depressive behaviors.
Excessive time on SM was associated with lower self-esteem about physique, which, in turn, was related to increased dietary restriction (Kaewpradub et al., 2017). The results of the study by Santarossa and Woodruff (2017) suggested that symptoms derived from the problematic use of SM are worrisome, as they were associated with lower self-esteem and more symptoms of EDs. Comparisons related to appearance provided through Instagram were positively associated with concern for body image, suggesting that the greater the body dissatisfaction, the higher the drive for thinness (Hendrickse et al., 2017).
Walker et al. (2015) reported that BMI and depression explained variations in the development of EDs, as well as the comparison of physical appearance on SM. Ferguson et al. (2014) observed a small correlation between the use of SM and a reduction in life satisfaction.
The study of Kaewpradub et al. (2017) found that one-third of the participants had abnormal attitudes towards eating and body image. Internet and SM usage were negatively associated with body image satisfaction but positively associated with inappropriate eating behaviors, binges, purges, laxative use, diuretics, and drive for muscularity. Similarly, Walker et al. (2015) observed that the presentation of one's image on Facebook was positively correlated with the internalization of the thin ideal, self-objectification, and drive for thinness.
The results of this study show that the use and dynamics generated in SM can determine the appearance and/or permanence of behaviors linked to ED psychopathologies. The time spent on SM, the interactions and dynamics, the sociocultural influence, gender, and self-esteem have all been shown to influence the type of exposure, utilization of SM, and also the possible development of ED psychopathologies. Usage patterns varied depending on the year in which the study was conducted, largely due to the rapid changes that occur in the functionalities of SM (Pantic, 2014), and the age of the SM users.
The time spent on SM linked to the development of EDs is a determining factor, as it increases the exposure and visualization of beauty references with which to compare oneself. Thus, as proposed by the Social Comparison Theory (Festinger, 1954), through SM, one arrives at a self-assessment of one's abilities and skills by comparing oneself with others. At the same time, the greater the exposure to SM, the greater the possibility of internalizing the thin ideal of beauty (Tiggemann & Slater, 2014). It is noteworthy that the most recent studies that considered the time spent on SM (Santarossa & Woodruff, 2017; Yellowlees et al., 2019) observed more minutes of daily consumption, compared to less recent research (Slater & Tiggemann, 2015), confirming the increasing tendency of SM consumption. This was also seen in the longitudinal study by Tiggemann and Slater (2017). In general, the increase in time spent on SM produces stronger correlations with concern for image (Tiggemann & Slater, 2014).
Interactions that occur in SM play a decisive role in the content that is presented and perceived, which is a predictor of concern for one's image (arising from the desire to receive feedback in comments and “likes” for published photos). Although SM has the potential to strengthen social relationships, negative reviews and comments can also occur (Hummel & Smith, 2015). As posited in the Parasocial Interaction Theory (Horton & Wohl, 1956), the illusion of reciprocal interaction that the audience experiences toward media figures can influence the comparison with their own body. As for the self-assessments of one's body that can be produced through SM, we highlight selfies seeking social validation oriented to physical appearance, which is reinforced through “likes” and comments by third parties (Butkowski et al., 2019). However, unposted selfies revealed greater bodily control behavior, associated with possible more severe EDs (Yellowlees et al., 2019). It is also essential to consider and attend to the type of accounts that are followed, such as health, beauty, and physical exercise accounts that correlate with the drive for thinness (Cohen et al., 2017). Another dynamic determinant of the use of SM is that it can serve as a means to anonymously seek support and recommendations through online communities that encourage thinness (“thinspo”), anorexia (“proana”), or bulimia (“promia”) (Brotsky & Giles, 2007; McCormack & Coulson, 2009), all of which can encourage EDs to be kept off the radar of family and friends (Gavin et al., 2008). However, Tiggemann et al. (2013) note that, if body image is perceived as an unrealistic objective, adolescent girls will be less likely to compare themselves socially with such images.
Sociocultural influence is relevant to the etiology of EDs (Black & Grant, 2014) and has been considered in a large part of the reviewed articles. Sociocultural perspectives suggest that societies have different body ideals that change over time, highlighting the tripartite influence model (van den Berg et al., 2002), which proposes that the media, peers, and family are key sociocultural channels for the transmission of these ideals. In this sense, the great growth in SM usage that is occurring should be borne in mind (Statista, 2021). Currently, Caucasians have constituted the predominant population in studies that examined the use of SM and its influence on EDs, with the exception of the following studies: Ferguson et al. (2014), an investigation in which Hispanic participants predominated; the study that used ethnic samples from Fiji (Becker et al., 2011); and the work that analyzed Black and White populations (Howard et al., 2017). The study that used the Fijian sample also considered an external sociocultural influence, expressly considering personal trips abroad, which was associated with more EDs (Becker et al., 2011). These results might be explained through the trend toward the globalization of body image, and the thin ideal of Western beauty that is fostered through the media (Yan & Bissell, 2014). The study with a Hispanic sample is of particular interest, given the lack of scholarly works on Hispanic populations (Ferguson et al., 2014). The diverse results obtained across these studies highlight the need for future studies to delve into sociodemographic issues, focusing on more diverse samples and also addressing socioeconomic differences.
The data in this systematic review showed the predominance of articles that have only studied female samples. In the six articles that did include males and females, analyses were limited to the female population and showed girls' increased likelihood of weight dissatisfaction, dieting to control weight, and purging (Anderson & Bulik, 2004; Lewinsohn et al., 2002). This trend is consistent with reports by the American Academy of Pediatrics (2003), which state that males constitute only 10% of all ED cases. Although the multifactorial perspective of the etiopathogenesis of body image suggests that gender creates a disadvantage and increases the women´s risk of EDs (Worell & Todd, 1996), further research comparing the two genders is needed. Related to gender, we have also seen issues such as intrasexual competitiveness, proposed by Hendrickse et al. (2017), which has a positive relationship with comparisons that occur on Instagram. Of the works that also studied males, 26.3% observed significant differences such as girls’ increased dissatisfaction with weight and weight management behaviors, which is reinforced by the increased prevalence of EDs among women (Keski-Rahkonen & Mustelin, 2016). The World Health Organization (WHO, 2019) indicates that these alterations usually occur during adolescence and early adulthood and are more common among women, which is compounded by girls' increased use of the Internet and SM with body-image-related content (Kaewpradub et al., 2017). However, more research is needed to build on the initial findings of Murray et al. (2016), which indicated that men's body image is also influenced by SM, and thereby clarify how the use of SM impacts body image and EDs among boys. There is some research in this area, such as that of Griffiths et al. (2018), who looked into adaptive and maladaptive SM usage in the context of body dissatisfaction, EDs, and anabolic steroid use. More work is needed, however, to further address the socio-cultural influence in the male population (Griffiths et al., 2018).
Most young people want to be accepted by their peers, so they attach more importance to their physical appearance as a way to gain approval by others, comparing themselves to others on SM, which, in turn, relates to lower self-esteem the more time they spend on SM (Kaewpradub et al., 2017). In addition to a concern for image and self-esteem, the study of Santarossa and Woodruff (2017) also reported a higher probability of ED and associated ED symptoms. Black women tended to have significantly higher levels of self-esteem and were less likely to compare their body to that of others (Quick & Byrd-Bredbenner, 2014). These behavior patterns can be better understood from the Objectification Theory (Frederickson & Roberts, 1997), which posits that women's bodies have been constructed socially as objects to be observed. As a consequence, women may practice self-monitoring, judging, and self-observing according to social standards, as if they were an external viewer.
Health workers and relatives of people with ED psychopathologies are largely unaware of the relationship between SM and this group of pathologies. It is hoped that this systematic review will help draw attention to the effects that continued use of SM can have on EDs. Sowles et al. (2018) reported that more than half of the parents of ED patients in their sample did not know the dynamics and interaction processes that occur in SM. The patterns of the drive for thinness (Tiggemann & Slater, 2017), internalization of the thin ideal through SM (Meier & Gray, 2014), and inappropriate eating behavior (Walker et al., 2015) can encourage, worsen, and normalize illness behaviors through continued use of SM (Tan et al., 2016). Specialists should also be attentive to body monitoring and validation behaviors through selfies among people with EDs, as these issues should be considered possible indicators of the development of pathology (Yellowlees et al., 2019).
A study on general Internet use and body image has concluded that public health efforts are needed to support girls and young women to achieve and maintain a positive body image in the current digital age (Carter et al., 2017). It is necessary to provide guidelines for healthy Internet use, as well as to reinforce girls’ and women’s authentic identity (not what is projected on SM) (Carter et al., 2017). To our knowledge, to date, there is only one other published review article linking SM usage and body image (Fallon et al., 2014) although that study did not include in its evaluation criteria that the studies reviewed must have ED measures. In this sense, the present review fills an important gap in the literature on ED psychopathologies.
The interactive nature of SM requires concrete and up-to-date research. SM are also a predominant media during the age of onset of the development of ED psychopathologies—puberty and adolescence. This systematic review may serve to gather key findings on the subject, helping to identify potential limitations and continue to address this topic through organized knowledge on the subject. Thus, the results can also be integrated into future research and discussions on the development of ED psychopathologies and the influence of SM. Moreover, this systematic review aims to respond to professional demands for comprehension of the use of SM and the development of ED psychopathologies, as well as to serve as the basis for generating preventive interventions when necessary (Šmahelová et al., 2019).
The PECO method (R. L. Morgan et al., 2018) was utilized to obtain greater accuracy in the selection of studies for inclusion in this systematic review as well as for establishing internal validity. The authors carried out an evaluation and examination of the quality and relevance of individual articles, using validated templates (Briggs, 2020). The discussion of the articles to achieve consensus strengthened the reliability. Each reviewer individually synthesized the results, followed by a joint discussion and assessment of each study, and finishing with the assignment of the studies to the categories presented in this systematic review. The number of articles in this synthesis of the existing literature further adds to the contribution to the field.
As a limitation of this study, it should be noted that there is only one clinical sample; a greater number of clinical samples could help to further define coping strategies. The databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO) were chosen for their predominance in multiple fields although, certainly, a larger number of databases might have yielded additional results. Another limitation lies in the impossibility of computing the average age of the participants in each of the studies (due to variability in how the findings were reported). Had this comparison been possible, we would have been able to compare the studies with even more granularity. Although the inclusion of video-predominant media went beyond the scope of the present study, future studies could also benefit from comparing video versus picture exposure. Future reviews that include studies published in additional languages would also positively contribute to research in this area.
This systematic review provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge on the relationship between the use of SM and ED psychopathologies and notes that the use of SM is significantly linked to body image concerns and the possible development and/or perpetuation of EDs.
After analyzing the studies, a predominance of studies published in international journals mainly from the United States ( n = 8) was identified. Thus, given the corroborated sociocultural influence, we underscore the need to increase research in territories such as southern Europe, where no research was found in this area despite the high use of SM. Thus, is necessary to expand the sociocultural diversity of the samples, as well as to work with a larger male sample. A greater number of longitudinal studies would help to determine and clarify how SM influences the development or permanence of EDs over time. Similarly, it would be relevant to have a greater number of experimental and quasi-experimental studies to better establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables and more robust conclusions on the impact of the use of SM on body image and ED psychopathologies. As this review has shown, interest and concern about the effect of SM usage on body image and ED psychopathologies are growing. However, studies that directly address socialization on the SM and EDs must also attend to the rapid changes and dynamics occurring in SM platforms as elements of communication and relationship in contemporary society. Prevention related to these media also needs to be promoted, to generate skills and information to resist media messages issued concerning the Western ideal of bodily perfection.
1 “Foodporn” refers to the eye-catching exposure of food through SM.
This research was funded by the Ourense Provincial Council and the University of Vigo (DIXITOU1-X002).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .
Copyright © 2021 Padín, González-Rodríguez, Verde-Diego, Vázquez-Pérez
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected]
Eating disorders are a group of heterogenous, disabling and deadly psychiatric illnesses with a plethora of associated health consequences. Exploratory research suggests that social media usage may be triggering body image concerns and heightening eating disorder pathology amongst young people, but the topic is under-researched as a global public health issue.
To systematically map out and critically review the existing global literature on the relationship between social media usage, body image and eating disorders in young people aged 10–24 years.
A systematic search of MEDLINE, PyscINFO and Web of Science for research on social media use and body image concerns / disordered eating outcomes published between January 2016 and July 2021. Results on exposures (social media usage), outcomes (body image, eating disorders, disordered eating), mediators and moderators were synthesised using an integrated theoretical framework of the influence of internet use on body image concerns and eating pathology.
Evidence from 50 studies in 17 countries indicates that social media usage leads to body image concerns, eating disorders/disordered eating and poor mental health via the mediating pathways of social comparison, thin / fit ideal internalisation, and self-objectification. Specific exposures (social media trends, pro-eating disorder content, appearance focused platforms and investment in photos) and moderators (high BMI, female gender, and pre-existing body image concerns) strengthen the relationship, while other moderators (high social media literacy and body appreciation) are protective, hinting at a ‘self-perpetuating cycle of risk’.
Social media usage is a plausible risk factor for the development of eating disorders. Research from Asia suggests that the association is not unique to traditionally western cultures. Based on scale of social media usage amongst young people, this issue is worthy of attention as an emerging global public health issue.
Citation: Dane A, Bhatia K (2023) The social media diet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people. PLOS Glob Public Health 3(3): e0001091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091
Editor: Rakesh Singh, Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal / KIST Medical College, NEPAL
Received: August 10, 2022; Accepted: January 23, 2023; Published: March 22, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Dane, Bhatia. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Eating disorders in the 21st century, types and burden..
Eating disorders are a group of heterogenous, disabling and deadly psychiatric illnesses that severely impair daily psychological and social functioning [ 1 ]. Characterised by disturbed body image attitudes and extreme preoccupations with weight and shape, eating disorders manifest as persistent and worrisome disordered eating behaviours [ 2 ]. International ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic classification tools recognise six principal clinical eating disorders [ Table 1 ] [ 3 ]. A supplementary Other Specified Feeding and Eating Disorder (OSFED) category captures approximately 60% of cases that do not meet criteria for clinical diagnosis [ 4 ].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.t001
Eating disorders incur an estimated 6–10% increase in years lived with disability [ 7 ]. Outcomes range from cardiovascular disease, reduced bone density, to comorbid psychiatric conditions, namely depression, anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder and specific phobias [ 8 , 9 ]. Amongst young females, eating disorders are one of the leading causes of disability, often preceding amenorrhea, reduced fertility, and adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes [ 10 , 11 ]. Anorexia has the highest mortality amongst all mental disorders: only 50% of individuals fully recover [ 7 , 8 , 12 ].
The cost of eating disorders at a health systems level is significant, fuelled by increased hospitalisations and the significant burden placed on primary and outpatient services. At a societal level, reduced workforce participation, family members as unpaid carers and young people out of education are noteworthy outcomes of eating disorders [ 11 ].
Despite perceptions of eating disorders as a culturally bound syndrome of the West, they affect individuals worldwide [ 7 ]. Estimating global prevalence, however, is challenging. Nationally representative data are scarce, the disorder tends to be omitted from national health surveys, and multiple changes to classification have confounded existing global data [ 13 – 15 ]. Despite this, the most recent Global Burden of Disease study calculated that in 2019, approximately 13.9 million people suffered from Anorexia or Bulimia. A subsequent review highlighted an additional 41.9 million overlooked cases of OSFED and binge eating disorder, indicating a total global prevalence of 0.7% [ 2 ]. However, since many cases never present at formal health services, actual prevalence may be much greater [ 16 ]. A review of 94 studies from Asia, Europe and North America revealed that the weighted mean of lifetime prevalence of any eating disorder was 8.4% for women and 2.2% for men [ 17 ].
Whilst females still represent the largest proportion of cases, the greatest increase is amongst males, athletes, those with obesity, and sexual and gender minorities [ 18 – 21 ]. Most eating disorders begin in adolescence but tend to persist throughout adulthood [ 22 ]. Therefore, young people constitute a subgroup of particular concern [ 13 , 17 ].
The aetiology of eating disorders is complex; no single risk factor accounts for their manifestation [ 23 ]. Rather, prevalence is hypothesised to be the result of numerous biological, psychological, psychosocial, and behavioural factors [ Table 2 ].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.t002
Body image, a multidimensional psychological construct encompassing how we think, feel and act towards our bodies—has been recognised as the most salient and consistent predictor of eating disorder symptomatology [ 9 , 25 , 26 ]. Although grounded in physical appearance, body image is rarely synonymous with it—individuals often view themselves through a lens of dysmorphia, seeing fatness, ugliness, or an endless list of flaws. The need to ‘fix’ what is ‘faulty’ is thought to precede compensatory disordered eating and appearance altering behaviours [ 27 ]. Owing to pubertal weight gain, wavering self-esteem, and a strong desire to fit in, body image concerns often begin in adolescence [ 28 ].
With increasing eating disorder prevalence, attention has turned to the growth of social media. In 2020, social media reached 49% of the global population [ 29 ]. Platforms including Facebook (FB), YouTube (YT), Snapchat (SC), Instagram (IG), WeChat and TikTok have created a new online world for today’s youth. Recent reports reveal that 91% of UK and US adolescents use social media, with over 50% checking these at least once per hour [ 30 ]. Users can choose who to follow or message, what content to engage with or upload, what to highlight or conceal. Using filters and editing tools, individuals can alter their identities and dictate how they and their lives are perceived by others [ 20 ].
What is posted and well-received is not coincidental–it is dynamic, shaped by broader social and cultural ideals related to beauty [ 31 ]. Online, young people are exposed to the ever-changing societal ideals of the ‘desired body’, with perfection as the often-unattainable end goal [ 9 ].
Body image dissatisfaction and eating disorder pathology amongst young people is rising. According to a recent UK Government report, 95% of under 18’s report that they would change their appearance, and body image was one of the top three anxieties amongst Australian youths [ 32 , 33 ]. An estimated 13% of young people experience an eating disorder by the age of 20, and 15–47% endorse disordered eating cognitions and behaviours [ 23 ]. Exploratory evidence indicates that social media usage may be partly to blame [ 34 , 35 ].
Research has highlighted factors such as the ease of accessing harmful eating disorder-promoting content, the pervasiveness of personalised ‘for you page’ algorithms and the explosion of weight loss trends that inspire extreme fitness or thinness [ 20 , 36 , 37 ].
In parallel, recent publications have drawn attention to rising concerns of modern social media platforms and public health, and the need to understand app engagement amongst younger demographics [ 38 ].
Despite this, the association between social media, body image and eating disorders remains relatively unexplored. However, with 41.9 million neglected cases of eating disorders in 2019, combined with unprecedented social media exposure amongst young people, this issue warrants further review from a global health perspective. Is social media a plausible risk factor for the development of body image concerns and recent rise in eating disorders? If so, is it a global or western phenomenon?
Our review aims to systematically map out and critically review the existing global literature on the relationship between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people. We provide a glossary of key terms to aid global health audiences unfamiliar with terminology related to social media, body image and eating disorders [ Table 3 ] .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.t003
In this review, we assess whether social media use could be a plausible and significant risk factor for the development of subclinical and clinical eating disorders on a global scale. We identify populations of young people affected, primary outcomes and any moderating or risk enhancing factors. We also explore pathways that may mediate the relationship between body image concerns and eating disorders/disordered eating behaviours within distinct social media platforms. Finally, we highlight gaps in the literature and recommend areas of focus for future research and for global health.
We used Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and the updated PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews [ 39 , 40 ] to guide our approach.
We searched MEDLINE, PyscINFO and Web of Science databases in May 2021 and updated our search on 20 th July 2021. We identified appropriate search terms through preliminary reading and listing relevant Medical Subject Headings. Keywords were related to four principal concepts: social media, body image, eating disorders and young people [ Table 4 ]. We entered keywords manually and used the “*” symbol to capture all potential word-endings. A full search strategy for PsycINFO is in S1 Fig .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.t004
We exported search results from each database to the reference manager Zotero. First, we removed duplicates. Next, we screened titles and abstracts and eliminated irrelevant papers. Subsequently, we assessed full-text articles against predetermined eligibility criteria, and recorded reasons for exclusion [ Table 5 ]. We identified additional studies through hand searching reference lists. Both authors independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full-text articles for inclusion. One reviewer carried out data extraction from all included studies, and the other reviewer independently verified that all entered information was correct. Any discrepancies were resolved by enlisting the help of additional reviewers who were not part of the study but had the relevant background in global health and nutrition.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.t005
To allow for sufficient depth of analysis and documentation of individual differences, we included studies involving young people (defined by the WHO as individuals aged 10–24 years), irrespective of gender, sexuality, ethnicity, or existing eating disorder status. If papers did not indicate the age range of participants, we included them if the reported mean age was ≤ 24. Our review was not restricted by geographic location or country income grouping, as a deliberate measure to develop a global understanding of social media use and body image or eating disorder, without making assumptions about the existence or nature of the phenomenon in countries categorised as low- or middle-income. We included studies on any social media platform (singular, multiple, or general), but not those focusing on mass media and / or internet use. We excluded studies exploring social media interventions and body image / disordered eating outcomes because they were beyond the scope of our review. Papers published between January 2016 and July 2021 were eligible.
Data charting process..
We used a data extraction table to synthesise relevant information from each study, starting with study type, country, and World Bank Income classification [ 41 ]. We also recorded number of participants, gender (percentage female), age range (mean and standard deviation), sexual orientation and ethnicity. After testing the extraction framework on a small number of included articles, BMI and eating disorder prevalence were added as additional participant characteristics.
We extracted information on study objectives, social media platform(s), underlying theoretical framework (stated or indicated) and definitions of exposure (social media usage), outcome (body image or eating disorder / disordered eating), mediator or moderator variables.
Formal critical appraisal is not a requirement of scoping reviews [ 42 ]. However, we aimed to analyse the relationship between social media, body image and eating disorder pathology and the plausibility of social media as a risk factor for clinical / subclinical eating disorders to guide future global health research and policy, and thus felt that a rigorous understanding of the quality of evidence was necessary.
We used three validated critical appraisal tools to account for study design, including: (i) the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies for cross-sectional, ecological momentary assessment, mixed methods, and longitudinal observational studies; (ii) an adapted version of the JBI tool for quasi-experimental studies for experimental and mixed methods experimental studies; and (iii) the Critical Appraisal Skills Checklist (CASP) for qualitative studies.
We gave studies one point for every checklist item fully met, and half a point when the item was partially met, and then calculated the proportion of checklist items met by each study. We categorised study quality as High (≥ 75% checklist covered), Moderate (50%-74% checklist covered), and Low (<50% checklist covered).
Our review and appraisal of the evidence was informed by Rodgers’ 2016 integrated theoretical framework [ 43 ] on the influence of internet use on body image concerns and disordered eating pathology. Interactions with others as well as individual online behaviours are important pathways linking internet use to body image and eating pathology, and a hypothesised feedback loop between the two reinforces the addictive nature of social media and sustained motivations for use despite potentially adverse outcomes. Whilst previous frameworks have focused on singular theoretical perspectives that explain this relationship, Rodgers incorporates five theories to provide mechanistic insight, including (i) sociocultural theory, (ii) self-objectification and feminist theory, (iii) impression management involving self-discrepancy and true-self theories, (iv) social identity theory, and (v) gratification theory.
We used Rogers’ framework in our scoping review in two ways. First, we assessed whether each included article addressed any of the framework’s specific pathways and noted any underlying theoretical assumptions that were outside of Rogers’ model but could potentially extend it. Second, we evaluated included studies to understand how well the current scope of literature matches Rogers’ proposed view, and how we could extend and update the integrated model in light of emerging evidence on social media use, body image and disordered eating published since 2016.
The review was based on previously published studies and therefore no ethical approval or participant consent was required.
This section details the findings of our review, beginning with an overview of search results and study characteristics. We then summarise the main exposures, outcomes, mediators and moderators identified in the literature. We present our synthesis of the literature in a framework describing a self-perpetuating cycle of risk.
We identified 273 articles from database searches, and after de-duplication, screening abstracts, reading full-texts, and hand-searching reference lists, we included 50 studies (45 quantitative and 5 qualitative) in our review ( Fig 1 ) (See S1 Table for individual summaries of the 50 studies).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.g001
Study design..
We reviewed 45 quantitative (30 cross-sectional, 6 experimental, 5 mixed methods, 2 ecological momentary assessment, and 2 longitudinal observational studies) and 5 qualitative studies. Qualitative studies collected data through focus group discussions (n = 4) and interviews (n = 1).
Ninety percent of studies (n = 45) were conducted in high-income countries. The largest number of studies were conducted in Australia (n = 12) and the United States (n = 11). Canada, Italy, Singapore, and United Kingdom were included in three studies each, Spain and Ireland in two each, and Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden in one each. Studies conducted in Sri Lanka (n = 1), China (n = 2), Malaysia (n = 1) and Thailand (n = 1) comprised the evidence base on upper-middle-income and lower middle-income countries, and none included populations in low-income countries.
48% of studies (n = 24) included only female participants, 2% of studies (n = 1) included male participants, and 50% (n = 25) included both genders. One study reported transgender participants, although this subcategory constituted only 9.3% of the study’s total sample [ 48 ].
Where ethnicity was reported, >75% of studies (n = 18) reported majority White participants, 17.4% (n = 4) reported majority Chinese participants, and <5% reported majority Hispanic participants.
Only 17 studies described participants’ BMI. Most participants (82%) were of a healthy BMI (18.5 to 25), with smaller proportions who met criteria for overweight (12%) and underweight (6%) BMI categories. Four studies (8%) identified participants with an existing eating disorder.
Most studies recruited participants from university (n = 20) and secondary schools (n = 19), with fewer studies using online (n = 6), community (n = 4) and clinical (n = 1) settings to recruit young people.
Most studies borrowed ideas from multiple theories. 78% of papers referred to Sociocultural Theory, with an emphasis on social comparison. 26% referred to Gratification’s Theory, 24% reported Self-objectification and Feminist Theory, 24% highlighted Impression Management Theory, and 12% of studies mentioned Social Identity Theory. We identified seven theories outside of Rodgers’ framework [ S2 Table ].
Twelve studies assessed general social media usage, 18 indicated multiple platforms, and nine focused on appearance orientated sites only (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube). Where specified, most studies investigated Instagram (n = 15), followed by Facebook (n = 5) and WeChat (n = 1).
Across studies, reasons for social media usage included: identity management, fitting in with friends, posting content for peer feedback, and seeking out weight loss, fitness, or pro-eating disorder material.
Many quantitative studies (n = 28) were of moderate quality. Generally, unfulfilled criteria included failure to address confounding variables, and lack of control group in experimental conditions. Most qualitative studies (n = 4) comprised high-quality evidence (>75% checklist met), although they did not always consider ethical issues or the positionality of the researcher [ S3 – S5 Tables].
The overarching relationship between social media use, body image and eating disorders operates through a range of mechanisms. Typically, social media usage led to body image concerns, eating disorder or disordered eating outcomes, and poor mental health via the mediating pathways of social comparison, thin / fit ideal internalisation, and self-objectification.
Approximately 58% of studies (n = 29) investigated specific types of social media exposure, including time, frequency, use of appearance-focused platforms, and investment in appearance related activity [Table A in S1 Data ].
Seven studies investigated the relationship between time spent on social media and body image or eating disorder-related outcomes. Time was significantly associated with these variables in two studies, although both papers failed to acknowledge other social media activities and possible mediators [ 49 , 50 ]. Three cross-sectional studies discovered that time spent on social media was associated with body image dissatisfaction via the mediating pathways of social comparison and thin ideal internalisation [ 51 – 53 ], indicating that the relationship between exposure and outcome is more nuanced than the mere number of hours spent online.
High frequency of social media usage and body image dissatisfaction was supported by two studies [ 54 , 55 ].
Three cross sectional studies indicated that appearance focused platforms, namely Instagram and Snapchat, are significantly associated with body image concerns, eating disorder pathology, anxiety and depressive symptoms [ 51 , 56 , 57 ].
17 studies identified that investment in appearance related activities (‘selfie’ avoidance, manipulation and posting edited photos, and significantly investing in ‘likes’ and ‘comments’) may be noteworthy exposures. These activities were consistently associated with body image dissatisfaction and risk of eating disorder pathology across a range of cross-sectional, experimental, and qualitative study designs (n = 14).
There were anomalies to this trend (n = 3). First, two studies found that posting ‘selfies’ on Instagram led to higher body esteem, rather than body image dissatisfaction [ 58 , 59 ]. However, included participants may have had significantly higher pre-existing body esteem, rather than this emerging as a consequence of posting.
Two prominent hashtags featured in the literature, drawing on the idea of social media as a source of inspiration or aspiration towards greater fitness (#Fitspiration) and thinness (#Thinspiration) ([Table B in S1 Data ]).
#Fitspiration . Eight studies investigated the impact of the fitspiration trend on body image dissatisfaction and eating disorder pathology with mixed results: 50% supported the relationship, 25% partly supported it, and 25% refuted it. Three moderate- to high- quality experimental studies demonstrated that exposure to fitspiration imagery relative to control images resulted in body image dissatisfaction and negative mood for participants, pointing towards a causal relationship [ 60 – 62 ]. Qualitative insight highlighted that for some, fitspiration inspired healthy eating and exercise. Others felt extreme pressure to ‘eat clean’ or exercise to excess, with subsequent bingeing and disordered eating outcomes [ 63 , 64 ]. A mixed methods study of fitspiration followers on Instagram found that 17.7% were at risk of developing an eating disorder, 17.4% demonstrated high levels of psychological distress, and 10.3% displayed addictive levels of physical exercise [ 65 ].
#Thinspiration and pro-eating disorder content . Three studies explored the relationship of the #thinspiration trend with body image and eating disorders. A mixed methods study concluded that the hashtag glorified “emaciated people” and “bone-thin girls”, promoting starvation as a lifestyle choice instead of a symptom of mental illness. Posts provided individuals with tips on how to lose weight and hide an eating disorder [ 48 ]. A cross-sectional study found that 96% of included participants followed the thin-ideal on social media, of whom 86% met the criteria for a clinical/subclinical eating disorder, and 71% and 65% reported symptoms of depression and anxiety, respectively [ 66 ]. Whilst these statistics are alarming, the study relied on self-reported symptoms and used novel eating disorder diagnostic tools that had not been extensively validated.
20 studies explored eating pathology as an outcome of social media usage [Table C in S1 Data ] .
Five cross-sectional studies yielded statistically significant associations between social media usage and various clinical eating disorders. These ranged from night eating syndrome [ 67 ], to binge eating disorder [ 68 ] and bulimia nervosa [ 69 ].
One cross-sectional and one qualitative study indicated orthorexia nervosa symptomatology amongst participants, ranging from obsessions with ‘clean eating’ to avoidance of ‘demonised’ foods and compulsive exercise behaviours [ 64 , 70 ]. A study of 713 participants confirmed orthorexia nervosa prevalence of 49% [ 70 ], far greater than the estimated <1% in the general UK population. However, participants were recruited from ‘fitness’ Instagram pages, and thus unlikely to be representative of all social media users or the general population.
More commonly, 11 studies found statistically significant associations between social media usage and disordered eating behaviours, including bingeing, purging, use of laxatives and extreme dieting. One cross-sectional study found that 51.7% of adolescent girls and 45% of boys engaged in meal skipping and excessive exercise [ 57 ]. Although the sample size was large (n = 993), behaviours were self-reported and study quality was low.
Two studies explored the effect of social media on eating disorder maintenance or recovery. A mixed-methods study found that only 3% of 499 participants with clinical/subclinical eating disorders used social media to aid recovery or as a form of treatment. The remaining 97% indicated that it hampered recovery, one stating that “when I get really hungry, I go into these sites to get motivation to not eat for a bit longer” [ 48 ].
33 studies demonstrated significant associations between social media usage and body image dissatisfaction, including body shame, low self-esteem and body related anxiety [Table D in S1 Data ] . Of these, five hypothesised that body image dissatisfaction preceded subsequent eating disorder pathology [ 50 , 71 ].
Although not the primary focus of the research, nine studies revealed significant associations between social media usage, body image concerns or disordered eating pathology, and poor mental health [Table E in S1 Data ] . Outcomes included low mood (n = 4), anxiety and depressive symptoms (n = 5).
We identified three key mediators [Table F in S1 Data ] .
12 studies investigated thin / fit internalisation as a mediator between social media usage and body image or disordered eating outcomes. Eleven (92%) indicated that it is a plausible mediator, across cross sectional (n = 7), experimental (n = 1) and qualitative (n = 3) study designs. In a qualitative study, female participants (n = 27) in focus group discussions reported feeling pressure to adhere to an ever-changing ideal [ 72 ]. In qualitative interviews, a sample of Swedish adolescents reported feelings of alienation following failure to adhere to the ‘toned but not too muscular’ ideal, whilst focus groups with Irish adolescents revealed participants’ feelings of self-blame and disgust [ 64 , 73 ].
21 studies explored the mediator of appearance comparisons on social media, with 19 (90%) reporting a significant relationship. Comparisons tended to be ‘upward’ and yielded feelings of inadequacy and self-loathing [ 53 , 63 , 68 ]. In contrast, an observational longitudinal study revealed that comparisons on Facebook did not predict body image dissatisfaction six months later [ 74 ]. However, Facebook use was marked as ‘outdated’ amongst younger participants (mean age in this study was 14.7 years) which could account for the non-significant finding.
Six studies recognised self-objectification as a significant mediator. Generally, participants reported self-criticism, picking out flaws in photos and purposively posting photos accentuating certain body parts [ 48 , 51 , 73 ].
The relationship between social media and body image / disordered eating was inflected by several moderating factors, broadly categorised as biological [Table G in S1 Data ] , cognitive [Table H in S1 Data ] and socio-environmental [Table I in S1 Data ] characteristics.
18 studies investigated gender as a moderator, 14 of which found significant differences between males and females. Generally, girls invested heavily in photos of themselves, endorsed the thin / fit ideal, made more comparisons with others, and engaged in higher levels of disordered eating pathology, specifically dieting and emotional eating [ 50 , 57 , 75 ]. In contrast, boys endorsed a more muscular ideal, with goals of functionality and fitness, rather than weight loss [ 76 , 77 ].
Qualitative focus groups implied that social media and body image is perceived as a gendered subject, with boys feeling reluctant to admit adverse effects due to stigma or fear of emasculation [ 63 ]. As most studies implemented self-report tools, and over half comprised mixed gender participants, this may have distorted findings. Remaining studies (n = 4) found no difference between males and females. Discrepancy may be due to variance in the assessment tools utilised for body image or disordered eating outcomes and differential sex ratios and mean age of participants.
Five studies investigated BMI as a moderator. Three indicated high BMI as strengthening the relationship between social media, body image dissatisfaction and eating disorder pathology. The two anomalies to this trend both included participants with abnormally low average BMIs [ 71 , 78 ]. All studies relied upon self-reported BMI, thus increasing risk of measurement error and bias.
Four studies indicated that inherent body image concerns (shame and low self-esteem) predicted certain social media behaviours and heightened susceptibility of eating disorder pathology. In contrast, body appreciation appeared to buffer against this effect [ 71 ], however, self-compassion was not a moderator [ 79 ].
Five studies highlighted that high-risk individuals with elevated eating disorder scores or a pre-existing eating disorder are more inclined to seek out damaging content on social media (such as thinspiration or weight loss). They may be more susceptible to mediating factors (internalisation and comparison) and are thus at heightened risk of further clinical / subclinical eating disorders [ 78 , 80 , 81 ].
Social media literacy..
Three studies indicated low social media literacy amongst participants, including difficulty switching off from damaging posts and an inability to recognise edited versus unedited posts [ 63 , 73 , 82 ]. In contrast, focus groups with adolescent girls in the US showed that having studied social media in school, girls were critical of its artificiality, reported that they could appreciate others’ beauty without jealousy, were self-accepting and did not feel the need to seek compliments online. Some engaged in comparisons, although this did not appear to lead to body image dissatisfaction and eating disorder pathology [ 83 ].
Our synthesis indicates that certain social media exposures and individual risk factors can strengthen this relationship, whilst numerous moderators may weaken, or even disrupt it. This led us to extend Rodgers’ framework [ 43 ] in light of new research, referred to here as a ‘self-perpetuating cycle of risk’ [ Fig 2 ].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.g002
Our findings indicate that specific features of social media usage (appearance focused platforms, investment in photos, and engagement with fitspiration and thinspiration trends) lead to body image concerns, disordered eating pathology and mental health outcomes. This relationship is shaped by the mediating pathways of thin / fit ideal internalisation, appearance comparisons, and self-objectification, which have been supported by additional meta-analyses [ 3 , 84 , 85 ].
However, due to the cross-sectional nature of most studies, it is impossible to identify the direction of causality: for example, do body image dissatisfaction and disordered eating occur because of social media usage, or do these pre-exist, encourage engagement in certain online activities, and result in unfavourable clinically significant outcomes?
Our revised framework recognises both possibilities. It is plausible that specific individual risk factors (particularly high BMI, poor body image and existing eating disorders) combined with differential motivations for social media use (identity formation, gratifications from peer feedback) encourage certain behaviours when users engage with social media (photo manipulation, searching for thinspiration and fitspiration content), strengthen the effects of mediators, and increase risk of poor body image, disordered eating, and mental health outcomes. This shifts away from the fatalistic notion that social media causes poor body image and eating disorders in all users. Instead, it suggests that certain individuals are simply more vulnerable to its deleterious effect.
This relationship is not linear. Results highlight that social media is highly addictive, and individuals use it despite negative outcomes [ 59 ]. In fact, to ‘fix’ their poor body image, users may be even more inclined to do so (e.g., manipulate photos to obtain more likes)—indicated by a hypothesised feedback loop. It is this which may trigger the self-perpetuating cycle of risk. However, this cycle can be broken. Several moderators, or buffers, that have the potential to disrupt it. Many studies showed that whilst individuals still internalised the ideal or compared themselves to others, high social media literacy and body appreciation prevented this from resulting in body image dissatisfaction, disordered pathology and poor mental health [ 71 , 83 ].
Our scoping review of 50 studies conducted in 17 countries found that social media usage is a plausible risk factor for the development of clinical / subclinical eating disorders across a range of country income groupings. We extended current thinking to describe how social media provides a platform of perfectionism, often embeds unhealthy ideals of disordered eating and fitness and can hamper recovery from eating disorders. We also identified mediators, moderators and important risk factors that shape this relationship and offer opportunities to intervene.
Taken as a whole, the literature underlines a complex, yet meaningful relationship between social media usage, body image concerns, and disordered eating pathology. While our review points to potentially large scale implications among the approximately 3.9 billion social media users worldwide, it is important to note that not every user has poor body image or an eating disorder [ 29 ]. This begs the question, what makes certain individuals more susceptible?
Disturbingly high prevalence of body image dissatisfaction, disordered eating pathology and comorbid mental health outcomes were reported amongst young social media users in this review [ 57 , 66 , 70 ]. Given the sheer scale of social media reach (approximately 60% of the world’s young people), a large proportion of young people could be exposed to the self-perpetuating cycle of risk [ 29 ]. Significantly, findings were reflected amongst Asian samples, mirroring concerns regarding the explosion of eating disorders in Asia [ 86 , 87 ] which has a population of 4.6 billion. Social media use as a risk factor for eating disorder pathology clearly warrants attention outside of high-income western countries [ 17 ].
Currently, up to 80% of eating disorder sufferers remain out of formal healthcare systems, with many presenting at late stages [ 66 ]. Denial, stigma, and fears that one’s disorder isn’t serious enough already hampers treatment seeking [ 14 ]. Today, young people are often immersed in a digital world where desires to change one’s body, excessive exercise and preoccupation with food appears normal [ 88 ]. How can young people identify that they have a problem, when their behaviours seem to be nothing out of the ordinary?
Eating disorders, clinical or subclinical, are serious psychiatric disorders with a range of comorbid health outcomes [ 28 , 89 ]. Unfortunately, they are often misunderstood, omitted from nationally representative health surveys, and viewed as less important than other mental health disorders [ 12 ]. Reports of 41.9 million neglected eating disorder cases in 2019, combined with a surge in cases recorded by health systems and charities alike calls for a serious reconceptualisation of the disorder [ 36 , 90 ].
This issue also sits within the wider arena of adolescent mental health. The WHO Global Strategy for Women’s, Children and Adolescent Health coupled with The Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020 demonstrate that investment in young people and their mental health yields invaluable gains for society [ 91 , 92 ]. Although eating disorders were recognised by The National Institute of Mental Health as a priority area for adolescents in 2007 with prevalence equalling that of bipolar and substance use disorders, they remain absent from these seminal reports and constitute a fraction of global mental health research [ 12 , 93 , 94 ].
Since 2007, the rise of social media has brought new challenges. Despite its dominance in the lives of Generation Z, we are only just beginning to learn about its impact [ 95 , 96 ]. Of significance, The UK Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) published a damning report on social media and mental health, whilst social media, body image and eating disorders have been recognised as emerging policy areas for the UK, Australian and US government alike [ 97 – 100 ]. In 2020, The UK launched their Online Harms White Paper to promote a regulatory framework of online safety and stimulate innovative social media intervention to protect young users. Eating disorder risk, however, remains absent from many of these youth centred goals in the UK [ 101 ].
Despite this rising concern, regulation of social media remains weak, with significant gaps between ‘safety policies’ and the real-life experiences of users [ 80 ]. Age, anonymity, and the pervasiveness of algorithms play a key role in this. Although required that users must be at least 13 years of age, most popular social media platforms have no robust means of age authentication. Recent figures reveal that up to 42% of children under the minimum age have a social media profile [ 102 ]. Users of all ages can join under any email address and disguise their identity through use of aliases. Once online, access to content is generally unrestricted, whilst algorithms suggest personalised content based on prior user engagement. In April 2021 Instagram sparked headlines after ‘appetite suppressants’, ‘fasting’ and ‘weight loss’ was recommended to certain users based on their previous searches [ 103 ]. Although rectified, content that glorifies eating disorders remains highly accessible, with little promise of intervention. More critically, internal research by Facebook conducted in 2019 leaked to the media in September 2021 showed not only that 40% of Instagram users who reported that they felt unattractive said that dissatisfaction began while using the platform [ 104 ], but also suggests that Facebook knew about the app’s potential to harm teenage girls’ mental health [ 105 ].
Further to this, evidence suggests that social media literacy amongst the young is low, and clinical recognition of eating disorder symptomatology and online risk factors poor [ 106 ]. In parallel, social media has been described as more addictive than alcohol and cigarettes, body image dissatisfaction and eating disorder pathology are on the rise, and the mental health of today’s youth is declining [ 98 ]. In light of COVID-19 lockdowns and further shifts towards an online world, this issue demands greater global attention [ 55 ].
As the topic is in its infancy, our recommendations for intervention and future research are generally exploratory.
Primarily, opportunity lies in raising awareness of social media and its possible connection to body image dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptomatology. In the UK, only 23% of young people learn about body image at school, although 78% believe that this would be useful [ 32 ]. Through investments in social media literacy [ 83 ], young people could learn to appreciate body diversity, navigate social media through a critical lens, and challenge the artificiality of the societal ideal of beauty. Open discussions between students, teachers, and parents could reduce the stigma associated with eating disorders and help young people to identify body image concerns and eating problems before they manifest as serious disorders. Preliminary research investigating social media literacy has shown promising outcomes [ 107 ].
At a societal level, recognition of the issue within government and health systems is paramount. To optimise positive social media use, communication between these players and social media companies should be enabled. From this, policies to enhance age verification, minimise access to pro-eating disorder content and increase the health and safety of users could be developed [ 106 ]. Recently, the UK Government Equalities Office approached social media influencers and advertising companies to devise strategies to enhance body diversity online [ 97 ]. Results are yet to materialise, although there is evidence of an emerging online ‘body positivity’ movement [ 95 , 108 ].
Within a clinical setting, appreciating eating disorders as serious mental health problems, screening patients presenting relevant symptomatology regardless of body size, and integrating social media as an additional factor within treatment plans could be advantageous [ 109 ]. At the global level, we recommend building health system capacity in low and middle-income countries in preparation for the potential future burden of eating disorders as a progressive strategy. However, based on funding, budget cuts, and the priority that other health issues currently take, the likelihood of this being implemented is unclear [ 110 ].
As discussed, the scope of evidence in this review is limited by the cross-sectional design adopted by most studies, the homogeneity of included participants, and limited geographic scope. Moving forward, researchers should consider conducting longitudinal studies with representative samples and cross-cultural comparisons covering all regions. This would provide greater clarity regarding the true directionality of the relationship, and grant insight into the impact of social media on young people across the life course. Likewise, ongoing qualitative studies with young people would aid understanding and provide rich data on a topic that is unique to this age group.
While our review describes certain risk factors, mediators and moderators in the extended framework, the nature of their role was not conclusive (including gender and personality traits). Future research would benefit from focusing on these to see whether they are as meaningful as current evidence suggests. The increase in eating disorder incidence among males and gender differences described by a small number of studies suggest that this particular moderator requires further investigation [ 111 ].
Next, previous research has highlighted that certain subcategories, including those with high BMI, athletes, and young people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) are more susceptible to body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders [ 112 ]. Study populations in this review tended to be White school or university students and did not reflect the intersectionality nor diversity of national populations. Thus, it would be beneficial to assess the relative impact of social media on eating disorders across these high-risk groups.
Finally, prior evidence suggests that media penetration and adoption of ‘western ideals’ increases the risk of eating disorder pathology [ 113 ]. Despite global scope, this review did not retrieve any studies from low-income countries. Therefore, this assumption requires further testing in these contexts. Future research should explore the relationship in low income, non-western cultures, which may be important as social media use rises globally.
First, due the cross-sectional nature of most included studies and generally ‘moderate’ quality, causation between social media usage and outcomes cannot be presumed. Likewise, with variance in tools used to assess mediators and outcomes, most of which were self-reported, measurement error and bias are possible.
Secondly, despite the reviews’ inclusive geographic scope, studies were concentrated within middle-high income countries in Europe, Asia, and Australasia. Although few cross-cultural differences emerged, scarcity of evidence from low-income countries means that generalisability is indicative rather than conclusive. Likewise, included samples were relatively homogenous. Most participants were of White ethnicity, average BMI, and female. Paucity of diverse evidence limits meaningful insight into any subcategories of particular risk.
Next, although the social media platforms covered in the literature were extensive, the digital landscape evolves rapidly. For example, TikTok (the most downloaded mobile application in 2020) is the focus of significant media concerns regarding body image yet is only mentioned by one study [ 55 ]. It may be that findings still fail to capture the most recent trends.
In the 21 st century, social media use amongst a developmentally susceptible age category is unprecedented and largely unregulated. ‘Likes’ and comments can validate identity, the societal ideal of beauty appears ubiquitous, and most people (albeit enhanced and filtered) appear to be perfect. In pursuit of acceptance, popularity and validation, the common option is to follow suit–to manage one’s own online identity to meet the ideal marked by others, to manipulate and scrutinise ‘selfies’, and once posted, angst over the numbers of likes or comments received. However, despite one’s best efforts, this online change is rarely good enough. Through the lens of social media, someone else can always look better, skinnier, or prettier [ 73 ]. Likewise, pro-eating disorder content is rife, and the ‘healthy’ #fitspiration trend may be fuelling new waves of disturbed eating and exercise pathology. The outcome is a population of young people at risk of corroded body image, gaping discrepancies between their actual and ‘polished’ online selves, and an increased likelihood of engaging in compensatory disordered eating behaviours, as our review has shown.
In parallel, cases of eating disorders are escalating, with prevalence far exceeding what was previously thought. Although it is not possible to isolate one single cause, the plausible link between social media, body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders is alarming. Based on the scale of social media usage, this could impact the wellbeing of a significant proportion of the world’s young- particularly those who are already vulnerable. Where the body of evidence is so recent, and social media ever evolving, the ramifications of this are not yet fully clear.
However, with significant strides being made in the realm of global adolescent mental health, intervention is clearly possible. Through recognition, funding, research, and prioritisation, there is hope that this issue will receive more attention, and concern will translate into tangible action. Our goal should be to have a generation of young people who are body positive, who use social media in a progressive way, who eat food because it is a basic human need, and who do not measure self-worth by the circumference of their thighs. We must also aim for widespread education and early identification of at-risk individuals, so that eating disorder symptomatology can be challenged long before it presents at formal healthcare settings.
The burden of body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders as a global health issue has been ignored for too long. The rise of social media has reinforced the need to turn attention to the ‘Cinderella disease’ of mental health, which this scoping review has demonstrated as worthy of a place on the global public health agenda.
S1 fig. full search strategy carried out in pyschinfo..
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s002
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s003
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s004
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s005
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s006
Data categorisation tables for the synthesis of results.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091.s007
We are grateful to Delan Devakumar for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
BMC Public Health volume 24 , Article number: 2466 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
70 Accesses
Metrics details
Social media use, perfectionism, and disordered eating have all increased over the last decades. Some studies indicate that there is a relationship between self-presentation behaviors and being exposed to others’ self-presentation on social media, and disordered eating. Studies also show that the relationship between focus on self-presentation and highly visual social media is stronger than for non-visual social media, hence facilitating upward social comparison. Nevertheless, no previous studies have investigated the link between adolescents’ focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media, and perfectionism and disordered eating, which is the aim of the present study.
The present study is based on a cross-sectional survey from the “LifeOnSoMe”-study ( N = 3424), conducted in 2020 and 2021. Respondents were high school students (mean age 17.3 years, 56% females) in Bergen, Norway. Multiple regression analysis was performed, where SPAUSCIS, a measure of self-presentation and upward social comparison, was the independent variable. Perfectionism and disordered eating were dependent variables. Self-reported age, gender, and subjective socioeconomic status were used as covariates, as well as frequency and duration of social media use. Regression models were performed to compare proportions across the median split of SPAUSCIS.
The multiple regression analysis showed that increased focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media were positively associated with both perfectionism (standardized coefficient 0.28) and disordered eating. A stronger association for girls than boys was found for disordered eating (standardized coefficient 0.39 for girls and 0.29 for boys). There was no gender moderation for perfectionism.
Findings suggest that focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media is associated with perfectionism and disordered eating. We recommend promoting a healthy use of social media. This could be established by increasing adolescents’ ability to reflect on and think critically about self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media.
Peer Review reports
Growing up today means growing up in a highly digitalized world where social media and online communication plays an important role in adolescents’ lives. Social media can be defined as “highly interactive platforms via which individuals and communities share, co-create, discuss, and modify user-generated content” [ 1 , pp. 241]. Previous studies have largely focused on the temporal aspects of social media use, and some studies indicate that social media use is associated with more mental health problems and decreased well-being [ 2 ]. For example, there are reports that more time spent on social media is associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety [ 3 , 4 ], sleep issues [ 3 , 5 ], and body dissatisfaction [ 6 ]. However, not all research confirms these associations [ 7 , 8 ], and recent studies have indicated that the observed link between time spent on social media and mental health is too small to be of practical importance [ 9 ]. A recent longitudinal study found time spent on social media to be the least important factor in relation to adolescent mental health [ 10 ]. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing and almost ubiquitous concern regarding social media’s potential negative effect on mental health. Considering this, it is increasingly recognized that it is important to investigate more than adolescents’ time spent on social media, such as their usage patterns. After all, social media offers a range of opportunities, such as seeking out like-minded others or specific topics and inspiration, for example, for food, fitness, and a healthy lifestyle. Although inspirational hashtags and pictures may be positive to many adolescents, they also frequently present a “perfect” lifestyle and some of them could even be considered unhealthy inspirations.
Self-presentation on social media has been highlighted as potentially important in connection with mental health and well-being among adolescents [e.g. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Baumeister & Hutton [ 15 ] defined self-presentation as an individual practice related to how one presents oneself to others, motivated by a wish to make a socially desirable impression on others, and simultaneously, stay true to one’s beliefs and ideals. On social media, self-presentation may include presenting and sharing self-made content, posting of personal opinions, sharing online content of interest, and “selfies” and pictures [ 14 , 16 ]. An American report noted that adolescents are more engaged in self-presentation activities on social media than any other age group [ 17 ]. As increased independence from parents is an important developmental milestone for adolescents, external validation from others may be particularly important for this age group [ 18 ]. Feedback on social media posts through likes and comments, may therefore be an important source of external validation from peers. Considering this, it is likely that many adolescents put great importance on how they present themselves on social media. In addition, social media is a suitable arena for self-presenting activities, as it gives the adolescent control over what, when and how to present themselves on the platform of their choosing [ 12 ]. Functions such as likes, comments, followers [ 19 ], and other measures of engagement, which are implemented on many social media platforms in one form or another, give ample opportunity for immediate feedback on posted content. Hence, this provides cues of social desirability and direction to align future social media posts with how the adolescents prefer to present themselves on these platforms [ 12 ]. These features of social media, in addition to the ability to reach a large and varied audience, may serve to facilitate self-presentation [ 20 ].
Self-presentation behaviors [e.g. 13 , 14 ] on social media are closely connected to focus on self-presentatio n [ 12 , 21 , 22 ]. Focus on self-presentation consist of caring about how you present yourself on social media, e.g., retouching pictures before posting them, caring about having a nice social media feed or striving for positive feedback on your social media posts, and can be independent of how much or how often a person post something [ 12 , 21 ]. As such, focus on self-presentation differs from self-presentation behaviors, which have been more extensively researched [e.g. 13 , 14 ]. A study showed that many adolescents have a desire to focus less on their self-presentation on social media, but that they think it is hard to resist the pressure of having a good feed and receiving positive feedback such as likes, comments, and followers [ 23 ]. A higher focus on self-presentation has been linked to the use of highly visual social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok and Facebook, rather than less visual platforms [ 12 ].
Likewise, use of social media has been linked to more social comparison, and in particular upward social comparison [ 24 , 25 ]. Social comparison is the propensity to compare one’s characteristics to other people to obtain information about how we are doing relative to others [ 26 ]. Upward social comparison occurs when one compares oneself to someone perceived as better or with higher status than oneself, which may be especially prevailing on social media. One study found that social media users mostly presume that other users have better lives than themselves [ 27 ]. Moreover, following a large number of people on social media increases the reference group to which adolescents compare themselves, and may include high-status people like “influencers” and celebrities [ 28 ]. Upward social comparison has been reported to be associated with more negative feelings such as depression and lower life satisfaction [ 11 , 29 ], and more body dissatisfaction [ 30 ]. Hawes et al. [ 31 ] also found that preoccupation with appearance comparison on social media was linked to symptoms of anxiety and depression among adolescents. Thus, while self-presentation on social media may not be harmful, feedback-seeking and upward social comparison may be damaging to mental health.
In addition to being a central period for self-presentation activities, adolescence seems to be a particularly susceptible period for the development of perfectionism. Perfectionism is a personality disposition that may be defined as the tendency to set unrealistically high performance standards and striving for flawlessness [ 32 ]. Perfectionism is thought to be a disposition largely consolidated in adolescence as a part of a general identity formation [ 18 ].
Over the last 30 years, there has been an increase in perfectionistic personality traits among young adults [ 33 ]. Curran & Hill [ 33 ] hypothesize that this might be a consequence of the rise of a competitive cultural trend, and also the advent of social media in young peoples’ lives. As social media gives adolescents control over how they self-present, social media also allows them to create a (highly) specific and “ideal” image of themselves. Considering these perspectives, Curran & Hill [ 33 ] suggest that young people perceive their social context as more demanding and subsequently believe others will evaluate them more harshly. An experimental study investigating the effect of selfie taking and posting on social media on women’s mood and body image, concluded that the psychological states subsequent of posting the selfies, was related to self-consciousness and/or fear of being negatively evaluated [ 14 ]. Thus, adolescents of today may to a larger extent strive for perfectionistic self-presentation in order to secure acceptance among peers than older generations. Hewitt et al. [ 34 ] suggested the concept of perfectionistic self-presentation and argued that this is a maladaptive self-presentation style. One facet of perfectionistic self-presentation is perfectionistic self-promotion, which includes proclaiming and displaying one’s perfection [ 34 ]. Through features such as likes, comments and followers, social media may be a key arena for perfectionistic self-presentation and self-promotion, and hence a way of seeking external validation and approval in a socially acceptable way among adolescents.
A study found that perfectionistic concerns predicted longitudinal change in self-presentation and that perfectionistic self-presentation was linked to decreased well-being [ 35 ]. Hence, perfectionistic concerns indirectly affected subjective well-being through self-presentation [ 35 ]. Perfectionistic self-presentation also predicted changes in both positive and negative affect [ 35 ]. In a meta-analysis, perfectionism was found to be positively associated to different psychological disorders and symptoms, including body dissatisfaction, and eating disorders [ 36 ].
Previous research has linked disordered eating to self-presentation [ 25 ] and to perfectionism [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. A person with disordered eating will be obsessed with food and have constant thoughts about eating, body shape, weight, and food. Symptoms of disordered eating above a certain level may constitute an eating disorder according to the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5th Ed.) [ 39 ] and the International Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders (ICD-10) [ 40 ]. A meta-analysis reported that over the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the weighted means of point eating disorder prevalence from 3.5% for the years 2000–2006 to 7.5% for the years 2013–2018 [ 41 ]. The prevalence for eating disorder was consistently higher among women compared to men regardless of timeframe (lifetime, 12-months, point prevalence). In the same meta-analysis, the authors also stressed the finding that eating disorders are highly prevalent in adolescence, with an estimated point prevalence between 6% and 8% [ 41 ].
As a great deal of content on social media promotes pictures of healthy food, diets, exercise, and appearance-focused images and idealized bodies, concerns have been raised that social media may contribute to body image concerns and disordered eating, especially among adolescents [ 42 , 43 ]. A systematic review, conducted by Holland & Tiggemann [ 43 ] showed that exposure to content on Facebook, in particular photo-based activity, was positively associated with negative body image and disordered eating behaviours in children, adolescents, and young adults. Another study found similar results; more exposure to appearance-related pictures on Facebook was associated with self-objectification, weight dissatisfaction, thin ideal internalization, and drive for thinness among girls [ 44 ].
Similarly, research indicates that exposure to others’ “perfect” self-presentations on social media may reinforce one’s own body image concerns and disordered eating [ 24 , 25 ]. Fardouly et al. [ 24 ] investigated young adult women’s appearance comparisons in different contexts in everyday life. They found that most of the appearance comparisons were made in person and on social media, and that the participants made relatively more upward appearance comparisons on social media than in person. They also found that upward appearance comparisons made on social media were associated with more body dissatisfaction than in person. In addition, upward appearance comparisons on social media yielded more thoughts about dieting than in person comparisons, but no difference in the likelihood of dieting-behaviours [ 24 ].
Furthermore, Rodgers et al. [ 25 ] found that social media use was positively correlated with higher internalization of appearance ideals, including a higher tendency to engage in appearance comparison, body dissatisfaction, muscle change behaviours and dietary restraints among both boys and girls. In addition, the internalization of social media ideals, the muscular ideals and appearance comparisons, were positively associated with body dissatisfaction, muscle change behaviours and dietary restraints. Other research has reported similar results [ 6 , 45 ]. Mclean et al. [ 45 ] found for instance, that self-presentation on social media was associated with internalization of social media ideals, and that the internalization mediated the effect of social media on appearance upward comparison and body dissatisfaction. A scoping review conducted by Dane & Bhatia [ 46 ] also reported that in cases where social media use led to eating disorder, the thin/fit body ideal internalization and social comparison often functioned as mediating pathways.
The Tripartite Influence Model (TIM) may serve as a theoretical framework linking the concept of focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media, with perfectionism and disordered eating [ 47 ]. The Tripartite Influence Model is a framework that can be used when exploring the relationship between social media use and body dissatisfaction. It proposes that pressures from peers, family and media makes one conform to certain appearance ideals, which can lead to internalization of body ideals, followed by physical appearance comparison with others [ 48 ]. This study’s focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media, aligns with the Tripartite Influence Model’s emphasis on how media and peers (e.g. to what content that receives positive feedback from peers), may contribute to adolescents’ perception of ideal body standards. Findings indicate that higher focus on self-presentation is more strongly linked to visual social media platforms than less visual platforms [ 12 ]. This support the Tripartite Influence Model theory that media pressure, especially through highly visual social media, leads to increased body ideal internalization an upward comparison with others. Additionally, the association between social media use and disordered eating can be understood through pressure to conform to societal ideals, such as body ideals, as proposed in the Tripartite Influence Model. Perfectionism, which is linked to disordered eating [ 36 , 37 , 38 ], may be driven by similar societal pressures.
Research on adolescents’ use of social media is increasingly shifting focus away from looking merely at time spent to include potential consequences of specific aspects of adolescents’ social media usage patterns [ 2 ]. The use of social media, perfectionism, and disordered eating have all increased over the last decades [ 33 , 41 , 49 ]. Studies indicate a relationship between being exposed to how others present themselves on social media and body dissatisfaction and disordered eating [ 24 , 25 , 43 ], and some studies have also investigated the relationship between self-presentation behaviors and body dissatisfaction [ 13 , 14 , 30 ]. Moving beyond self-presentation behaviors, such as the frequency or content of social media posts, one study showed that being preoccupied with appearance on social media, was associated with increased risk for problems like appearance related anxiety and disordered eating [ 22 ]. In two previous studies, we showed that preoccupation with likes and comments, retouching photos of oneself, deleting photos with too few likes, and upward social comparison, collectively referred to as “focus on self-presentation”, was associated with more symptoms of anxiety and depression [ 12 ] and that focus on self-presentation varied significantly between adolescents [ 21 ].
Hence, the aim of the present study is to investigated the link between focus on self-presentation on social media, and perfectionism and disordered eating. Based on previous studies we hypothesize that focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison is positively associated with (i) perfectionism and (ii) disordered eating, and (iii) self-reported diagnosis of an eating disorder.
Study sample.
This study is based on data from the “LifeOnSoMe” study carried out at public senior high schools in Bergen, Norway. Pupils aged 16 or older were invited to participate, giving an age range from 16 to 21 years old. Information about the survey was conveyed both by the teacher and digitally. The online web survey was conducted digitally. One school hour was set aside for carrying out the survey. The total number of eligible participants was 3,424 (mean age was 17.3 years (standard deviation 1.0)), and 56% ( n = 1916) of the participants were girls. This study included data from two survey waves conducted in September-October 2020 and June-September 2021. For participants who responded in both waves, only their 2020 responses were used in this analysis. The response rate was 53% in 2020 and 35% in 2021. The research data was stored on secure storage facilities located at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, which prevent the authors from providing the data as supplementary information, according to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Only researchers with approval from the Regional Ethical Committee had access. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Committee, and is in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation. Additional information about the study is available elsewhere [ 23 , 50 ].
The participants reported their age, gender, and subjective socioeconomic status. A small proportion of the participants did not state their age ( n = 157). For gender, participants could choose between three options: “girl”, “boy”, and “other/non-binary”. Because too few participants (< 50) answered “other/non-binary”, these were excluded from the data set due to privacy concerns. Relative socioeconomic status was assessed by asking the participants to estimate how economically well off their families are compared to others, ranging from «very poor» (scored 0) to «very well off» (scored 10).
Two questions were included related to social media use in general: “How often do you use social media?” and “On the days that you use social media, approximately how much time do you spend on social media?”, giving an estimate of the frequency and duration of their usage, respectively. For frequency, the response alternatives were “almost never”, “several times a month, but rarer than once a week”, “1–2 times per week”, “3–4 times per week”, “5–6 times per week”, “every day”, “several times each day”, and “almost constantly”. In the present study, we differentiated between “daily or less”, “many times a day”, and “almost constantly”. For duration, seven response alternatives ranging from “less than 30 min” to “more than 5 h” were available. In the present study, we differentiate between “<2 h”, “2–4 h”, “>4–5 h”, and “>5 h”.
The items used to assess upward social comparison and aspects of self-presentation were developed based on focus group interviews with senior high school pupils [ 23 ], and have been shown to have adequate psychometric properties in both this sample [ 21 ] and elsewhere [ 12 ]. Cronbach’s \(\alpha\) was 0.87, indicating a very good internal consistency. The results of an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the SPAUSCIS have been reported in a previous publication based on the “LifeOnSoMe”-data [ 21 ]. Also, EFA and CFA was investigated in another, smaller sample of senior high school students [ 12 ]. The results from both studies strongly suggested a unidimensional scale and the fit indices from CFA were all considered good. Examples of items included in SPAUSCIS are “I retouch images of myself to look better before I post them on social media”, “I use a lot of time and energy on the content I post on social media”, and “The response I get for what I post (images/status updates/stories) impacts how I feel”. The response categories were “not at all”, “very little”, “sometimes/partly true”, “a lot”, and “very much”, coded 1–5. The mean summed score thus ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a higher focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media.
Perfectionism (edi-p).
Perfectionism was assessed by the 6-item perfectionism scale in the Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI) for children and adolescents [ 51 ]. The perfectionism items (EDI-P) are usually rated on a 6-point Likert scale. In the present study, however, the response options were “not true” (scored 0) “sometimes true” (scored 1), and “true” (scored 2) in accordance with the version employed in the youth@hordaland survey [ 52 ]. This yields a potential score of 0–12 when the items are summed. Previous research has found that the EDI [ 53 ] and EDI-P [ 54 ] have satisfactory psychometric properties in similar populations. Cronbach’s \(\alpha\) was 0.72 in the present study, indicating acceptable internal consistency.
Symptoms of disordered eating was assessed using the Eating Disturbance Scale (EDS-5) [ 55 ]. EDS-5 consists of five questions specifically related to eating, such as comfort eating (item 2) and strict dieting in order to control ones eating habits (item 4). The response options are “not true” (scored 0) “sometimes true” (scored 1), and “true” (scored 2), and the summed scored ranges between 0 and 10. The questionnaire have shown adequate psychometric properties and convergent validity in previous research [ 55 , 56 ]. Cronbach’s \(\alpha\) was 0.78 in the present study, indicating an acceptable internal consistency.
For the purposes of the present study, both EDI-P and EDS-5 were used as continuous measures, as well as dichotomous variables, differentiating between low and high scores based on the 90th percentile. The chosen cut-off point is informed by previous research which suggest this to be an adequate delineation for mental health problems [ 52 , 57 ].
For the participants participating in the study in 2020, self-reported psychiatric diagnoses were available ( n = 1978) using a pre-defined list adapted to fit this age-group. Initially, the participants had to answer “yes” or “no” to the question “Have you ever received a diagnosis for a mental health problem?”, followed up by a list of 11 possible different diagnoses for those who endorsed the initial question. The list was based on a similar operationalization used in a large population-based studies [ 58 , 59 ]. The list contained no definition of the included disorders or conditions. For this study, the participants who chose “Eating disorder” ( n = 36; 1.8%) from the list were identified as having been diagnosed with the condition, and all others were designated as not having received the diagnosis.
First, summary statistics of the included variables for the whole sample were estimated across the median-split of SPAUSCIS and presented in Table 1 . For categorical variables, the number and proportions were estimated, and the mean and standard deviation (SD) was estimated for continuous variables. Comparisons across the median-split of SPAUSCIS was done using Pearson’s chi-squared tests for categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for continuous variables. Then, two simple linear regression models were estimated using SPAUSCIS as an independent variable and (a) score on perfectionism (EDI-P) and (b) score on disordered eating (EDS-5) as dependent variables, respectively. The scores of the dependent variables were standardized (Z-scored) to ease interpretation of the resulting coefficients. Potential gender-moderation was investigated by entering genderxSPAUSCIS in both models as an interaction term into the model. The interaction term was considered statistically significant with a p-value of < 0.05, and if significant, results from the linear regression model were then presented separately for girls and boys. Linearity of the association between SPAUSCIS and the dependent variables were investigated using restricted cubic splines with four knots. Next, two gender-specific multiple logistic regression models were estimated using the median-split of SPAUSCIS as the main independent variable, and the 90th percentile score on (a) perfectionism (EDI-P) and (b) disordered eating (EDS-5) as dependent variables, respectively. Both models were adjusted for usual amount of social media use and socioeconomic status, and the results are presented as odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The median-split of SPAUSCIS were used in these models for simplicity and ease of interpretability. In post-hoc analyses, we did however, investigate the association between SPAUSCIS as a continuous measure and the 90th percentile score (a) perfectionism (EDI-P) and (b) disordered eating (EDS-5) as dependent variables, respectively. This was done using logistic regression analyses with restricted cubic splines to test for non-linearity. Both these models were adjusted for usual amount of social media use and socioeconomic status, and the results are presented in-text as odds ratios for trends with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Finally, we investigated the association between the median-split of SPAUSCIS and self-reported eating disorder using simple logistic regression. No adjustments or investigation of potential gender-moderation was included for the latter analyses as the number reporting eating disorder ( n = 36) limited the statistical precision. Missing data ranged from n = 2 (0.1%) to n = 55 (1.6%) across analyses, and pairwise deletion was applied to ensure the highest number of observations in each analysis.
Descriptive statistics of the included variables are presented across the median split of score on SPAUSCIS in Table 1 . For all of the included variables, there were significant differences between the SPAUSCIS-groups (all p-values < 0.001). The group with median or above scores on SPAUSCIS were more likely to be girls, more likely to use social media more often and for a longer duration but reported a slightly lower subjective socioeconomic status. Furthermore, they were more likely to report higher scores on perfectionism (EDI-P) and disordered eating (EDS-5).
Results from gender-specific multiple logistic regression models with median-split of SPAUSCIS as dependent variable, and the 90th percentile score on (a) perfectionism (EDI-P) and (b) disordered eating (EDS-5) as dependent variables is presented in Table 2 . For boys and girls, scoring on or above the median on SPAUSCIS was associated with increased odds for both dependent variables. For both perfectionism and disordered eating, the models are adjusted for social media use and socioeconomic status. In the post-hoc analyses using SPAUSCIS as continuous variable, the odds ratios (OR) in relation to perfectionism were 1.88 (95% CI 1.43–2.47, p < 0.001) and 1.77 (95% CI 1.44–2.17, p < 0.001) for boys and girls, respectively. For disordered eating, the corresponding ORs were 1.94 (95% CI 1.40–2.68, p < 0.001) for boys and 2.00 (95% CI 1.72–2.32, p < 0.001) for girls. Using restricted cubic splines, we did not find evidence for non-linearity in the post-hoc analyses.
There was a significantly higher odds of reporting being diagnosed with an eating disorder among those scoring median or above on SPAUSCIS (crude OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.58–7.84; p = 0.003).
Association between focus on self-presentation and perfectionism and disordered eating. Linear regressions with restricted cubic splines. Note: Figure 1: SPAUSCIS: Self-Presentation and Upward Social Comparison Inclination Scale; EDI-P: Eating Disorders Inventory-Perfectionism; EDS-5: Eating Disturbance Scale-5
Figure 1 presents findings from linear regression models with mean score on SPAUSCIS as the independent variable and the standardized (Z-scored) score on (a) perfectionism (EDI-P) and (b) disordered eating (EDS-5) as dependent variables. For both dependent variables, a potential gender moderation of the association with SPAUSCIS was investigated, and potential non-linearity was investigated using restricted cubic splines with four knots. For disordered eating, a significant gender moderation was found, and the association was stronger for girls than boys. For perfectionism, no evidence for a gender moderation was found. For both dependent variables there was a significant linear association with self-presentation equal to a low-to-moderate effect size.
In the present study we investigated the potential association between focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media, and perfectionism and disordered eating. As hypothesized, we found evidence for consistent positive associations. Increased focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison was associated with increased levels of both perfectionism and disordered eating with a small-to-medium effect size. For perfectionism, the associations were similar for both boys and girls, while we found evidence of a gender moderation for disordered eating. Specifically, the association with disordered eating was somewhat stronger for girls compared to boys. For self-reported eating disorder, we also found a positive association with focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison. Focusing on how the adolescents relate to self-presentation on social media, the study gives new insight into important aspects of usage patterns of social media. It also provides new insight into potential gender differences in focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media, and social media´s potential role in development of disordered eating. These findings are pertinent in a public health perspective and may help to inform efforts to mitigate these potential negative effects.
Our findings are consistent with the Tripartite Influence Model, as our study revealed positive associations between focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media, and both perfectionism and disordered eating. Individuals who focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison may be more susceptible to sociocultural pressures which may lead to a strive for perfection and conforming to unhealthy body ideals. Our findings underscore the potential role of sociocultural pressures in shaping body image dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors. Specifically, the positive association between focus on self-presentation on social media and perfectionism may have several explanations. Curran & Hill [ 33 ] argue that the increase in perfectionistic traits among young adults may be due to a response to cultural changes towards a more individualistic and competitive culture in Western societies. As social media is an important part of adolescents’ and young peoples’ lives, it is likely that the perfectionistic tendencies will affect self-presentation on these platforms as well. Curran & Hill [ 33 ] also suggest that the increase in perfectionism among young adults may be due to their perception of increased demands from the social environment. Self-presenting in a socially desirable way in general, and on social media specifically, may be a way to ensure social acceptance from peers. They further hypothesize that the fear of losing acceptance may increase perfectionistic traits [ 33 ]. Hence, increased perfectionism may be the reason for stronger focus on self-presentation on social media. However, since we cannot interpret the direction of the association from this study, focus on self-presentation may also increase adolescents’ perfectionistic tendency. As perfectionism is a personality trait that largely establishes during adolescence, it may be that the increased opportunity to self-present on social media, and thus focus on self-presentation, makes adolescents more susceptible for developing perfectionistic traits.
There is a lack of research on the relationship between focus on self-presentation on social media and disordered eating. Most of the research investigating this relationship have looked at being exposed to appearance-related self-presentation on social media and body dissatisfaction and disordered eating [ 24 , 25 , 43 ], in addition to self-presentation behavior [ 13 , 14 , 45 ], not the relationship between a person’s focus on self-presentation on social media and disordered eating. Our results indicate a positive relationship between focus on self-presentation on social media and disordered eating. Highly visual social media platforms that expose adolescents to “perfect” bodies through others’ self-presentation may constitute an important source of such exposure. Previous findings support that being exposed to body ideals, may lead to internalization of these ideals among adolescents [ 25 , 45 , 46 ]. Other findings also report that upward social comparison may be a potential consequence of the exposure to others’ “perfect” appearance related self-presentation [ 24 , 31 , 60 ], leading to body dissatisfaction [ 30 ]. Subsequently, some adolescents may be more preoccupied with eating, weight, body shape, and muscularity. This preoccupation could serve as a mitigation strategy to reduce the discrepancy between the adolescent’s perceived appearance and the ideal body and appearance of the reference person. Thereby reducing the negative body image and negative feelings produced from the upward social comparison.
Another explanation may be that adolescents with disordered eating already are more preoccupied than other adolescents with how they appear to others. Social media is an apt arena to self-present in an appearance-related and desired way, and could elicit wanted feedback from others through likes and comments. This may further reinforce the focus on self-presentation. A third potential explanation for this relationship is perfectionism as a conceivable mediating factor. As perfectionistic self-presentation can be understood as a maladaptive self-presentation style [ 34 ], perfectionism may lead to a strict view of what constitute a good-enough self-presentation. This may as well include the adolescent’s expectations and demands to their own body as thin or muscular, hence increasing the standards of flawlessness in their own appearance-related self-presentation on social media. If these expectations are too rigid, it might for some adolescents be a contributing cause in the development of disordered eating.
In relation to the association between focus on self-presentation on social media and disordered eating we found a stronger association for girls than boys. Hjetland et al. [ 61 ] found significant gender differences in how adolescents related to self-presentation on social media. Girls reported that they invested more time and energy on the content of their own social media posts. They used more filters to look better at least sometimes and reported feeling less satisfied with themselves because of other peoples’ social media posts. Girls also tended to ascribe more importance to the feedback they got on social media than boys. In general, the report showed that social media played a bigger part in the girls’ lives than the boys’, and that the girls placed more importance on what is happening on social media [ 61 ]. Hence, more importance placed on self-presentation on social media among girls, and social media playing a more important role in girls’ lives, may increase the focus on self-presenting in an ideal way, in addition to being stronger underlying causes in development of eating disorders for girls than for boys.
There may as well be other explanations for the gender difference we found. The objectification theory [ 62 ], suggests that women’s bodies are more often looked at, evaluated and potentially sexually objectified. Fredrickson & Roberts [ 62 ] further argue that these views make women internalize the observer’s perspective of themselves, and to some degree also socialize women to treat themselves as objects for the pleasure of others. The emphasis put on girls’ and women’s physical appearance, in particular, is well established in our culture [ 60 ]. Through social media’s feedback mechanisms, girls may be more encouraged than boys to self-present in an objectifying way.
Social comparison theory [ 26 ], and especially upward social comparison, is another possible explanation for the gender difference between focus on self-presentation on social media and disordered eating. Strahan et al. [ 60 ] found that when describing their physical appearance, women used significantly more upward social comparisons than downward social comparisons. Men, on the other hand, made more downward comparisons than upward. This tendency was not seen when women and men described other personal characteristics like social skills. For women, they also found that the more upward social comparison they made, the more negative statements they made about their body [ 60 ]. They proposed that ubiquitous appearance norms, mostly applying to women, disrupted strong self-enhancement behaviors [ 60 ]. Fardouly et al. [ 24 ] also found that women relied on upward social comparisons when comparing their appearances, and that doing this on social media was associated with more body dissatisfaction than in person. A proposed explanation for this is that women may experience a stronger discrepancy between themselves and women they see on social media compared to women they see in person [ 24 ].
Previous research on self-presentation behaviors has primarily focused on appearance-related self-presentation and upward social comparison [e.g. 24 ] and associated risk among girls, such as body dissatisfaction [ 13 , 14 , 30 ], thin ideal internalization and disordered eating behavior [ 25 , 44 ]. However, it is important to recognize that boys may also be affected by these issues, and a study showed that body dissatisfaction affected boys’ risk of engaging in disordered eating behaviors [ 63 ]. The current body ideals for boys emphasize muscularity [ 64 ], and Eisenberg et al. [ 65 ] found that muscle-enhancing behaviors are common among American adolescents, including both boys and girls. This were behaviors like dieting, exercising, and taking protein supplements or steroids, with the aim of increasing muscle size or tone. However, most of the behaviors measured were significantly more common among boys [ 65 ], and Compte et al.’s [ 64 ] investigation of muscle dysmorphia among young adult men indicated a prevalence of almost 7%. Hence, another explanation for the gender difference we found, may be that the EDS-5-questionnaire does not identify symptoms of drive for muscularity or muscle dysmorphia. In fact, muscle dysmorphia seems to be more of a concern than thinness and weight loss among boys [ 64 ]. The EDS-5 measures of symptoms of disordered eating are linked to preoccupation about weight loss, body shape and drive for thinness [ 55 ], and may therefore not fully capture the range of body image concerns among boys.
The present results demonstrate the need to address focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media as potentially important factors for adolescents’ mental health. As such, promoting a healthy use of social media could be established through a focus on increasing adolescents’ ability to reflect on and think critically about self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media. Our results indicate a need for targeted interventions to promote healthy social media use and enhance adolescents’ critical thinking about self-presentation and underscores the urgency of public health initiatives. One public health approach would be to equip adolescents with critical thinking skills to navigate social media mindfully. In relation to appearance-related ideals, educational programs should address the unrealistic standards perpetuated online, while fostering resilience and promoting positive self-image. Educational programs and social media literacy programs in school have been suggested to increase adolescents’ reflections about their own and others social media use [ 42 , 66 , 67 ]. Gordon et al. [ 42 , 67 ] introduced a four-lesson social media literacy program in a junior high school that aimed to decrease body dissatisfaction, dietary restraints and focus on increased muscles among young adolescents. They found only a small effect of the intervention. The intervention did not focus on self-presentation and based on results from this study and previous research [e.g. 12 , 27 ], this would be an important topic to address for future interventions. Also, previous results suggest that interventions led by individuals who already have an established relationship with the adolescents and are familiar with their needs help facilitate discussions among the adolescents [ 42 ], and improve intervention outcomes. Teachers could therefore be considered effective social media educators, especially if social media literacy could be integrated in existing school subjects.
A study of university students showed that women who had a higher internalization of the thin-ideal, were more vulnerable to disordered body image and hence to appearance exposure in media [ 68 ]. They also found that body appreciation protected women from negative effects of the exposure [ 68 ]. Thus, developing social media literacy programs specifically focusing on the effects of self-presentation and upward social comparison could be an important target for interventions, and possibly reduce focus on self-presentation. Research [ 69 ] also suggest that increasing self-compassion is a useful strategy to prevent perfectionistic self-presentation on social media. As perfectionistic self-presentation is related to lower subjective well-being [ 35 ], this may also be a topic to address in an intervention aiming to reduce focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media.
While our study adds to the knowledge base, future research should investigate the concept of self-presentation on social media more closely. It will be important to examine if different ways of self-presentation vary from each other. Previous research has investigated how people self-present, especially through the use of selfies [e.g. 70 , 71 ], and further research should investigate if taking pictures of oneself and posting them is dissimilar from other ways of self-presentation on social media when considering its association to mental health among adolescents. SPAUSCIS consist of only one item asking about specific ways of self-presenting (“I retouch images of myself to look better before I post them on social media”), thus future research on other ways of self-presenting behaviors should include self-presentation for example through pictures of other aspect of the adolescents’ life, like friends or hobbies, or through text only. Investigating focus on self-presentation on social media, perfectionism and disordered eating among younger adolescents than we included in our study will be important as the use of social media starts early and as disordered eating often emerges in adolescence [ 72 ]. Understanding at what age focus on self-presentation becomes more prominent for adolescents’ and potential gender differences regarding this, may also be important to pinpoint intervention opportunities.
A major strength of the present study is that it is the first study to investigate the relationship between focus on self-presentation on social media, perfectionism and disordered eating. So far, the research on this has focused on self-presentation behaviors [e.g. 13 , 14 , 30 , 45 ] in addition to being exposed to others ’ (perfect) self-presentations and the prevailing body ideals [e.g. 24 , 25 , 43 ]. To our knowledge no previous study has examined the association between focus on self-presentation and perfectionism and disordered eating. In addition, the scales used in this study are well-established [ 55 , 54 , 56 ]. Also, the items of SPAUSCIS were derived from focus-group interviews with adolescents [ 23 ], which make them relevant for adolescents’ experiences related to self-presentation and social comparison on social media. Some limitations are also worth mentioning. The study is cross-sectional, thus we cannot determine causality between the investigated factors and mental health. Despite the sample being large, it is limited to high schools in Bergen, Norway. Consequently, the results may not be generalizable to other countries or cultures. Also, the participation rate was moderate (53% and 35%), which may impact the validity of our findings. However, associations are less vulnerable to bias caused by low participation rates than prevalence estimates [ 73 ]. Another limitation is that SPAUSCIS in this study does not differentiate between various methods of self-presentation. Consequently, we cannot conclude from this study whether specific types of self-presentation, such as taking selfies versus posting pictures of hobbies, have the same impact on perfectionism, eating disorders or disordered eating. Also, the use of self-reported amount of social media use has been shown to be biased in previous research and is not likely to be an accurate measure of actual use [ 74 ]. This may have impacted our ability to effectively account for the confounding effect of social media use. And finally, although EDS-5 is a well-established and validated measurement, the questionnaire does not cover specific symptoms of drive for muscularity and muscle dysmorphia.
While previous studies have focused on self-presentation behaviors, this study found that focus on self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media is positively associated with both perfectionism and disordered eating, as well as self-reported eating disorders among adolescents. As such, promoting a healthy use of social media could be established through increasing adolescents’ ability to reflect on and think critically about self-presentation and upward social comparison on social media. Our results underscore the importance of targeted public health interventions to promote awareness and healthy social media use among adolescents, emphasizing the need for educational programs that address focus on self-presentation, unrealistic appearance-related ideals and foster resilience and positive self-image.
Explicit consent from the participant is required by the Norwegian Health research legislation and the Norwegian Ethics committees in order to transfer health research data outside of Norway. Ethics approval for this was also dependent on storing the research data on secure storage facilities located at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, which prevent the authors from providing the data as supplementary information. Request to access these datasets should be directed to [email protected].
Kietzmann JH, Hermkens K, McCarthy IP, Silvestre BS. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus Horiz. 2011;54(3):241–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 .
Article Google Scholar
Schønning V, Hjetland GJ, Aarø LE, Skogen JC. Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-being among adolescents – A scoping review. Front Psychol. 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949 .
Woods HC, Scott H. #Sleepyteens: social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. J Adolesc. 2016;51:41–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.008 .
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Brunborg GS, Burdzovic Andreas J. Increase in time spent on social media is associated with modest increase in depression, conduct problems, and episodic heavy drinking. J Adolesc. 2019;74:201–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.013 .
Varghese NE, Santoro E, Lugo A, Madrid-Valero JJ, Ghislandi S, Torbica A, Gallus S. The role of Technology and Social Media Use in Sleep-Onset difficulties among Italian Adolescents: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e20319. https://doi.org/10.2196/20319 .
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jarman HK, Marques MD, McLean SA, Slater A, Paxton SJ. Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: a mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison. Body Image. 2021;36:139–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.005 .
Keles B, McCrae N, Grealish A. A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. Int J Adolescence Youth. 2020;25(1):79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851 .
Coyne SM, Rogers AA, Zurcher JD, Stockdale L, Booth M. Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Comput Hum Behav. 2020;104:106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160 .
Orben A, Dienlin T, Przybylski AK. Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019;116(21):10226–10228. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902058116 .
Panayiotou M, Black L, Carmichael-Murphy P, Qualter P, Humphrey N. Time spent on social media among the least influential factors in adolescent mental health: preliminary results from a panel network analysis. Nat Mental Health. 2023;1(5):316–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00063-7 .
Frison E, Eggermont S. Harder, Better, faster, stronger: negative comparison on Facebook and adolescents’ life satisfaction are reciprocally related. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2016;19(3):158–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0296 .
Skogen JC, Hjetland GJ, Bøe T, Hella RT, Knudsen AK. Through the Looking Glass of Social Media. Focus on Self-Presentation and Association with Mental Health and Quality of Life. A Cross-Sectional Survey-Based Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021;18(6):3319. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3319 .
Bij de Vaate NAJD, Veldhuis J, Konijn EA. How online self-presentation affects well-being and body image: a systematic review. Telematics Inform. 2020;47:101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101316 .
Mills JS, Musto S, Williams L, Tiggemann M. Selfie harm: effects on mood and body image in young women. Body Image. 2018;27:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.007 .
Baumeister RF, Hutton DG. Self-Presentation Theory: Self-Construction anf Audience Pleasing. In Theories of Group Behavior , Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R., Eds.; Springer New York, NY, USA, 1987. pp. 71–87.
Herring S, Kapidzic S. Teens, gender, and Self-Presentation in Social Media. London, UK: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015. pp. 146–52.
Google Scholar
Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social Media & Mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010. pp. 17–25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed525056 .
Negru-Subtirica O, Pop EI, Damian LE, Stoeber J. The very best of me: Longitudinal associations of perfectionism and identity processes in adolescence. Child Dev. 2021;92(5):1855–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13622 .
Eranti V, Lonkila M. The social significance of the Facebook like button. First Monday. 2015;20(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i6.5505 .
Schlosser AE. Self-disclosure versus self-presentation on social media. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020;31:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.025 .
Hjetland GJ, Finserås TR, Sivertsen B, Colman I, Hella RT, Skogen JC. Focus on Self-Presentation on Social Media across Sociodemographic Variables, lifestyles, and personalities: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):11133. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/11133 .
Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Hawes T, Scott RA, Campbell T, Webb HJ. Adolescents’ online appearance preoccupation: a 5-year longitudinal study of the influence of peers, parents, beliefs, and disordered eating. Comput Hum Behav. 2023;140:107569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107569 .
Hjetland GJ, Schønning V, Hella RT, Veseth M, Skogen JC. How do Norwegian adolescents experience the role of social media in relation to mental health and well being: a qualitative study. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00582-x .
Fardouly J, Pinkus RT, Vartanian LR. The impact of appearance comparisons made through social media, traditional media, and in person in women’s everyday lives. Body Image. 2017;20:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.11.002 .
Rodgers RF, Slater A, Gordon CS, McLean SA, Jarman HK, Paxton SJ. A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and body image concerns, disordered eating, and muscle-building behaviors among adolescent girls and boys. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49(2):399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01190-0 .
Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7(2):117–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202 .
Chou HT, Edge N. They are happier and having better lives than I am: the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15(2):117–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324 .
Castellacci F, Tveito V. Internet use and well-being: a survey and a theoretical framework. Res Policy. 2018;47(1):308–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.007 .
Nesi J, Prinstein MJ. Using Social Media for Social Comparison and Feedback-Seeking: gender and Popularity Moderate associations with depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015;43(8):1427–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0 .
Scully M, Swords L, Nixon E. Social comparisons on social media: online appearance-related activity and body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Ir J Psychol Med. 2023;40(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.93 .
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hawes T, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Campbell SM. Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity. Body Image. 2020;33:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.010 .
Hewitt PL, Norton GR, Flett GL, Callander L, Cowan T. Dimensions of perfectionism, hopelessness, and attempted suicide in a sample of alcoholics. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 1998;28(4):395–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.1998.tb00975.x .
Article CAS Google Scholar
Curran T, Hill AP. Perfectionism is increasing over time: a meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychol Bull. 2019;145(4):410–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000138 .
Hewitt PL, Flett GL, Sherry SB, Habke M, Parkin M, Lam RW, McMurtry B, Ediger E, Fairlie P, Stein MB. The interpersonal expression of perfection: Perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1303 .
Mackinnon SP, Sherry SB. Perfectionistic self-presentation mediates the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and subjective well-being: a three-wave longitudinal study. Pers Indiv Differ. 2012;53(1):22–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.010 .
Limburg K, Watson HJ, Hagger MS, Egan SJ. The relationship between perfectionism and psychopathology: a Meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2017;73(10):1301–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22435 .
Bardone-Cone AM, Wonderlich SA, Frost RO, Bulik CM, Mitchell JE, Uppala S, Simonich H. Perfectionism and eating disorders: current status and future directions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(3):384–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.12.005 .
Sherry SB, Hewitt PL, Besser A, McGee BJ, Flett GL. Self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism in the eating disorder inventory perfectionism subscale. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10237 .
American Psychiatric Association. Feeding ans eating Disorders. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.); 2013. pp. 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 .
World Health Organization. F50-59 Behavioral syndromes associated with psychological disturbances and physical factors. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research; 1993. pp. 136–142.
Galmiche M, Déchelotte P, Lambert G, Tavolacci MP. Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000–2018 period: a systematic literature review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1402–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy342 .
Gordon CS, Jarman HK, Rodgers RF, McLean SA, Slater A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Paxton SJ. Outcomes of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the SoMe Social Media Literacy Program for Improving Body Image-Related Outcomes in Adolescent Boys and Girls. Nutrients, 2021;13(11):3825. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/11/3825 .
Holland G, Tiggemann M. A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image. 2016;17:100–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008 .
Meier EP, Gray J. Facebook Photo Activity Associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2013;17(4):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0305 .
McLean SA, Paxton SJ, Wertheim EH, Masters J. Selfies and social media: relationships between self-image editing and photo-investment and body dissatisfaction and dietary restraint. J Eat Disorders. 2015;3(1):O21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-3-S1-O21 .
Dane A, Bhatia K. The social media diet: a scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(3):e0001091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001091 .
Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S. Exacting beauty: theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Am Psychol Association. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/10312-000 .
Burke NL, Schaefer LM, Karvay YG, Bardone-Cone AM, Frederick DA, Schaumberg K, Klump KL, Anderson DA, Thompson JK. Does the tripartite influence model of body image and eating pathology function similarly across racial/ethnic groups of White, Black, Latina, and Asian women? Eat Behav. 2021;42:101519.
Shewale R. Social Media Users – Global Demographics. 2023. Demandsage.com. URL: https://www.demandsage.com/social-media-users/ .
Skogen JC, Andersen AIO, Finserås TR, Ranganath P, Brunborg GS, Hjetland GJ. Commonly reported negative experiences on social media are associated with poor mental health and well-being among adolescents: results from the LifeOnSoMe-study. Front Public Health. 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1192788 .
Garner DM. Eating Disorder Inventory-2 manual Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198321)2:2%3C15::AID-EAT2260020203%3E3.0.CO;2-6
Sand L, Bøe T, Shafran R, Stormark KM, Hysing M. Perfectionism in adolescence: associations with gender, Age, and socioeconomic status in a Norwegian sample. Front Public Health. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.688811 .
Lampard AM, Byrne SM, McLean N, Fursland A. The eating disorder Inventory-2 perfectionism scale: factor structure and associations with dietary restraint and weight and shape concern in eating disorders. Eat Behav. 2012;13(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.09.007 .
Engelsen BK, Laberg JC. A comparison of three questionnaires (EAT-12, EDI, and EDE-Q) for assessment of eating problems in healthy female adolescents. Nord J Psychiatry. 2001;55(2):129–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480151108589 .
Rosenvinge JH, Perry JA, Bjørgum L, Bergersen TD, Silvera DH, Holte A. A new instrument measuring disturbed eating patterns in community populations: development and initial validation of a five-item scale (EDS-5). Eur Eat Disorders Rev. 2001;9(2):123–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.371 .
Heradstveit O, Holmelid E, Klundby H, Søreide B, Sivertsen B, Sand L. Associations between symptoms of eating disturbance and frequency of physical activity in a non-clinical, population-based sample of adolescents. J Eat Disorders. 2019;7(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-019-0239-1 .
Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015 .
Krokstad S, Langhammer A, Hveem K, Holmen TL, Midthjell K, Stene TR, Bratberg G, Heggland J, Holmen J. Cohort Profile: the HUNT Study, Norway. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(4):968–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys095 .
Sivertsen B, Råkil H, Munkvik E, Lønning KJ. Cohort profile: the SHoT-study, a national health and well-being survey of Norwegian university students. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e025200. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025200 .
Strahan EJ, Wilson AE, Cressman KE, Buote VM. Comparing to perfection: how cultural norms for appearance affect social comparisons and self-image. Body Image. 2006;3(3):211–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.07.004 .
Hjetland GJ, Finserås TR, Skogen JC. «Hele verden et tastetrykk unna – Ungdommers bruk og opplevelser med sosiale medier og online gaming» [Worldwide in a keystroke – Adolescents’ use and experiences with social media and online gaming]. Bergen: Folkehelseinstituttet. 2022. https://www.fhi.no/publ/2022/hele-verden-er-et-tastetrykk-unna---ungdommers-bruk-og-opplevelser-med-sosi/ .
Fredrickson BL, Roberts T-A. Objectification Theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and Mental Health risks. Psychol Women Q. 1997;21(2):173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x .
Neumark-Sztainer D, Paxton SJ, Hannan PJ, Haines J, Story M. Does body satisfaction matter? Five-year Longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and Health behaviors in adolescent females and males. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(2):244–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.001 .
Compte EJ, Sepulveda AR, Torrente F. A two-stage epidemiological study of eating disorders and muscle dysmorphia in male university students in Buenos Aires. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48(8):1092–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22448 .
Eisenberg ME, Wall M, Neumark-Sztainer D. Muscle-enhancing behaviors among adolescent girls and boys. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):1019–26. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0095 .
McLean SA, Wertheim EH, Masters J, Paxton SJ. A pilot evaluation of a social media literacy intervention to reduce risk factors for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(7):847–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22708 .
Gordon CS, Rodgers RF, Slater AE, McLean SA, Jarman HK, Paxton SJ. A cluster randomized controlled trial of the SoMe social media literacy body image and wellbeing program for adolescent boys and girls: study protocol. Body Image. 2020;33:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.003 .
Halliwell E. The impact of thin idealized media images on body satisfaction: does body appreciation protect women from negative effects? Body Image. 2013;10(4):509–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.004 .
Keutler M, McHugh L. Self-compassion buffers the effects of perfectionistic self-presentation on social media on wellbeing. J Context Behav Sci. 2022;23:53–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.11.006 .
Diefenbach S, Christoforakos L. The Selfie Paradox: nobody seems to like them yet everyone has reasons to take them. An exploration of psychological functions of Selfies in Self-Presentation. Front Psychol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00007 .
Rousseau A. Adolescents’ selfie-activities and idealized online self-presentation: an application of the sociocultural model. Body Image. 2021;36:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.005 .
Striegel-Moore RH, Bulik CM. Risk factors for eating disorders. Am Psychol. 2007;62(3):181–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.3.181 .
Knudsen AK, Hotopf M, Skogen JC, Øverland S, Mykletun A. The health status of nonparticipants in a population-based health study: the Hordaland Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1306–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq257 .
Verbeij T, Pouwels JL, Beyens I, Valkenburg PM. The accuracy and validity of self-reported social media use measures among adolescents. Computers Hum Behav Rep. 2021;3:100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100090 .
Download references
We are grateful to Bergen municipality and Vestland County Council for their collaboration on this study. The present study is linked to a larger innovation-project lead by Bergen municipality in Western Norway related to the use of social media and mental health and well-being. The innovation-project is funded by a program initiated by the Norwegian Directorate of Health and aims to explore social media as platforms for health promotion among adolescents. Above all, we are very thankful for the pupils who participated in this study.
The work of GJH was supported by Dam Foundation (grant number 2021/FO347287) while the work of JCS, AIOA, and TRF was supported by The Research Council of Norway (grant number 319845).
Open access funding provided by University of Bergen.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway
Hilde Einarsdatter Danielsen, Turi Reiten Finserås, Amanda Iselin Olesen Andersen, Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland & Jens Christoffer Skogen
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Hilde Einarsdatter Danielsen & Vivian Woodfin
Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland & Jens Christoffer Skogen
Department of Clinical Psychology, Solli District Psychiatric Centre, Bergen, Norway
Vivian Woodfin
Center for Alcohol and Drug Research (KORFOR), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
Jens Christoffer Skogen
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
JCS analyzed the participants’ data regarding the LifeOnSoMe-study. All authors contributed to interpretation of the results. HED and JCS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Additional contributions and revisions to the manuscript were made by TRF, AIOA, GJH, VW, JCS, and HED. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Hilde Einarsdatter Danielsen .
Ethics approval and consent to participate:
The study was conducted in accordance to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Regional Ethical Committee (REK) in Norway (REK#65611). All participants gave informed consent prior to participation, and was informed about the general purpose of the study and the opportunity to withdraw from the study at any point. As all the adolescents invited were 16 years or older, they were considered competent to consent on their own behalf, and additional consent from parents or guardians was not prerequisite.
not applicable.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Danielsen, H.E., Finserås, T.R., Andersen, A.I.O. et al. Mirror, mirror on my screen: Focus on self-presentation on social media is associated with perfectionism and disordered eating among adolescents. Results from the “LifeOnSoMe”-study. BMC Public Health 24 , 2466 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19317-9
Download citation
Received : 04 July 2023
Accepted : 01 July 2024
Published : 10 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19317-9
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1471-2458
Home > ETD > 1289
Social media use, disordered eating, and body image in adolescent females: a systematic review of the literature.
Alara Ozpolat Follow
Adolescent females are especially at risk of developing eating disorders due to expectations surrounding body image, social pressures, and influence from peers. With the significant role of social media in daily life, the average adolescent currently spends several hours a day engaging with content on social media. The overall aim of this review was to better understand the impact of social media consumption on disordered eating and body image among female adolescents. The primary research questions explored within this systematic review were as follows: Is there a relationship between social media use, body image concerns, and/or eating disorder symptoms in adolescent girls? What social media platforms and forms of engagement on social media are related to body image concerns and disordered eating? What is the age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status of adolescent females endorsing body dissatisfaction and/or eating disorder symptoms? Seven studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined and their findings were synthesized narratively. Results of this review help identify gaps in the literature to guide eating disorder prevention, treatment, and research.
Mass media and teenage girls; Eating disorders in adolescence; Body image in adolescence
School affiliation.
Graduate School of Education and Psychology
Degree type.
Dissertation
Faculty advisor.
Judy Ho Gavazza
Ozpolat, Alara, "Social media use, disordered eating, and body image in adolescent females: a systematic review of the literature" (2022). Theses and Dissertations . 1289. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/1289
Since December 14, 2022
Psychology Commons , Social Media Commons
Advanced Search
Additional information.
Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement
Privacy Copyright
Files in this item.
Your vanderbilt.
Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.
share this!
September 10, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
by University of Toronto
As adolescents continue to spend more time on screens and social media, a new study finds that among 9–14-year-olds, excessive time online is associated with a higher risk of having eating disorder symptoms.
These symptoms include worrying about gaining weight, tying one's self-worth to weight, compensatory behaviors to prevent weight gain , binge eating , and experiencing distress over binge eating.
The study is published in the journal Eating and Weight Disorders—Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity .
"Social media promotes constant comparisons to peers and exposure to unattainable body ideals," says senior author Jason M. Nagata, MD, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco. "This can contribute to dissatisfaction with one's own body, reduced self-esteem , and unhealthy attempts to control weight, all of which increase the risk of developing eating disorders and other mental health issues."
Problematic social media and mobile phone use , characterized by dependence that impairs daily life, are also associated with eating disorder symptoms. Social media overconsumption may not only increase exposure to body ideals and comparisons, but may also intensify impulsive behaviors, reinforce binge eating, and contribute to addictive tendencies.
"Adolescents should limit social media that encourages eating disorders and appearance comparisons. Parents can play an important role by developing Family Media Use Plans and holding open conversations about problematic screen use and disordered eating concerns," says Nagata.
The study builds on existing knowledge surrounding eating disorders in adolescents, which have among the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric disorder. The study uses data from the nationwide Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, the largest long-term study of brain development in the United States. The study collected data for 11,875 children aged 9–14 years old. Study participants provided information about their typical screen habits, as well as whether they had experienced eating disorder symptoms.
"This study underscores the need for more research on the relationship between social media , problematic screen use, and mental well-being in early adolescence ," says co-author Kyle T. Ganson, Ph.D., assistant professor at the University of Toronto's Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work. "Future research should focus on identifying specific types of content that pose the greatest risk for young people developing eating disorder symptoms."
Explore further
Feedback to editors
3 hours ago
4 hours ago
5 hours ago
Related stories.
Sep 6, 2023
Oct 18, 2023
Mar 1, 2021
Aug 17, 2024
Feb 15, 2023
May 8, 2024
Sep 12, 2024
Let us know if there is a problem with our content.
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Medical Xpress in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Candy laurine suarez-albor.
1 Faculty of Nursing, Universidad Popular del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
2 Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
3 Faculty of Nursing, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
The World Health Organization has placed eating disorders among the priority mental illnesses for children and adolescents given the risk they imply for their health. Recognizing the risk factors associated with this problem can serve as the basis for the design of timely and effective interventions. The objective of the study was to identify the factors associated with eating behavior in adolescents through a systematic review.
Systematic review. Search of the literature in the bibliographic sources CINAHL, CUIDEN, Pubmed, Dialnet, SCIELO and Science Direct. The search was conducted in October and November 2020. The search terms were Eating Disorders, Food Intake, and Adolescents. The evaluation of the methodological quality was carried out using a specific guide for observational epidemiological studies. A narrative synthesis of the findings was made. Additionally, the vote counting and sign test technique was applied.
25 studies were selected. The associated factors were body dissatisfaction, female gender, depression, low self-esteem, higher BMI that increases the risk of eating disorders.
a high impact of psychological factors was observed. These should be considered in the design of effective interventions to prevent this disease, although the search needs to be broadened to identify larger and more complex studies that allow for a more comprehensive review. ( www.actabiomedica.it )
Eating disorders (EDs) are complex and multifactorial pathologies that affect physical and mental health and are life threatening. They are characterized by an excessive preoccupation with the weight and shape of the body or a frank deviation of the body image, accompanied by voluntary restriction of the intake or the presence of episodes of binge eating that cause great suffering, impairment of health and quality of life ( 1 ). The prevalence of eating disorders is variable; in the last two decades several studies have been carried out, especially by the National Institute of Mental Health of the United States, which has compiled cases even from European countries. The countries with the highest cases are Switzerland 12%, Chile 8.3% and Spain 6.2% ( 2 ); Colombia is followed by 4.5% ( 3 ), the United Kingdom 3.7% ( 2 ) and Portugal 3.06% ( 2 ). Countries such as the United States, Italy, Costa Rica, Mexico, Honduras, Venezuela, have numbers between 0.5% -1.5% ( 4 , 5 ). Most of these disorders are more common in women and begin in adolescence, a stage of change where body image is consolidated. This in turn generates numerous crises of identity, physical appearance, friendly or sexual requirements and a struggle for autonomy, traits of perfectionism and self-demand that can lead to low self-esteem, dependence on the environment, difficulty in expressing emotions or expressing aggressiveness ( 6 , 7 ).
The World Health Organization (WHO) has placed eating disorders among the priority mental illnesses for children and adolescents given the risk they imply for their health and the great psychiatric comorbidity ( 8 ). Among the most frequent, depressive disorders 23.3%, anxiety disorders 10%, adaptive disorders 3.3% and negative perception of family relationships 43.3%, which aggravate the problem and cause important complications in the state of health ( 7 , 9 ). For this reason, EDs have become more relevant for the interest in the clinic, research and epidemiology ( 9 ). Various factors intervene in the occurrence of eating disorders and show a higher attributable risk such as biological, psychological, family and sociocultural ( 2 - 7 ). Thus, scientific evidence is abundant when addressing various aspects of eating disorders, however the state of the art revealed that in the last five years no literature review have been published on the subject, which is relevant to design or guide effective interventions that allow professionals to prevent these events. In this sense, the aim of this work was to carry out an exhaustive review of the published evidence about the factors associated with eating behaviour in adolescents.
A systematic review was carried out according to the guidelines of the PRISMA ( 10 ) statement, in the bibliographic sources LILACS, CUIDEN, Pubmed, Dialnet, SCIELO and Science Direct and MEDES. The search was carried out in October and November 2020. The search terms to be used were consulted in the DECS and MESH libraries, to guarantee their standardization, in English and Spanish, they were conjugated in search equations with the Boolean operators AND and OR thus: AND factors (Eating Disorders OR Food Intake OR Eating Behavior) AND adolescent.
Articles were selected from cohort, cross-sectional, and case control studies about factors associated with EDs in adolescents. The inclusion criteria were (a) free access articles in full text, (b) primary studies published between 2009 and 2020 to ensure that as many necessary and relevant studies as possible have been included in the review, (c) studies with a sample of adolescents aged from 10 to 19 years, according to the classification provided by the WHO ( 9 ). Dissertation, meta-analysis, review, experimental, intervention, or treatment studies were excluded, as well as studies with a mixed sample (children, adolescents, adults), and investigations without statistical information of association.
The selection of the articles was carried out in 4 phases. First, title and abstract were read to determine the suitability of the study and elimination of duplicates. Second, full text was read and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Third, a reverse and forward search was performed on the included studies to locate as many documents as possible. Fourth, the risk of bias was assessed through critical reading based on the Critical Reading Guide for Observational Studies in Epidemiology ( 11 , 12 ). A guide to assess cross-sectional studies was used ( 11 ). This instrument included 31 items that allow for minimizing biases and the confounding effect of internal validity. It was evaluated qualitatively using MB: very good, B: good, A: regular, and NI: does not report. A second guide was used to assess cohort studies and case-control studies ( 12 ). The instrument included 21 items and evaluated qualitatively the followings aspects: selection of subjects, validation of question, evaluation of the final outcomes, confounding factors, statistical analysis, general evaluation of the study, and description of the study, using A: adequately, B: partially, C: improperly, and D: I don’t know. This process was carried out by the first author and was audited by the other authors.
The data were consolidated through a structured booklet in Excel based on two types of information: (i) information about articles’ characteristics such as study sample, main author, year of publication, language, country, design; (ii) information about eating disorder risk factors such as biological, psychological, sociocultural, and family factors.
The information was treated qualitatively and analysed in a narrative way. The results were organized in tables and figures according to the PRISMA statement. Additionally, the found results exceeded the number of 20 articles, so the vote counting technique was applied. Such a technique consisted in granting a positive vote for studies with a statistically significant relationship between a risk factor and EDs, and a negative vote when there was no significant association. Subsequently, the sign test ( 13 , 14 ) was applied to determine if the difference in the number of positive studies was significantly greater than the opposite result. A significance value was established to be less than 0.05. It is important to notice that these techniques are limited but they can help to guide the results of the review in the absence of meta-analysis ( 14 ).
General diagram of the study
About the cross-sectional studies, 54.5% (n = 12) obtained high methodological quality, 27.2% (n = 7) medium quality, and 4.6% (n = 1) low methodological quality. This study was excluded by the revision. With regard to the cohort studies, it was assumed that studies with adequate rating in 23-26 items were considered to be of high methodological level; medium level was attributed to studies with adequate rating in 19-22 items, and low methodological level was attributed to studies with adequate rating in 18 items or less. In this sense, 100% (n = 3) of the cohort studies obtained a medium methodological quality ( Tab. 1 and Tab. 2 ).
Critical reading and assessment of methodological quality for cross-sectional studies.
Main author, year and country | Study type | Participants (sample is adequate and similar to the general population, minimizing the probability of selection bias) | Statistical analysis and confusion (analysis is adequate and the possibility of confusion is minimized) | Summary assessment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Internal validity (study design allows minimizing biases and the confounding effect | Overall study quality (quality of the evidence provided by the study): | ||
Esteban, Et al, 2014, Spain ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | MB | MB | NA | B | MB | B | B | B | high | high |
Shahyad, Et al, 2018, Israel ( ) | Cross-sectional | MB | B | B | MB | R | B | B | NA | B | high | medium |
Yirga, Et al, 2016, Ethiopia ( ) | Cross-sectional | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | B | B | B | B | high | high |
Altamirano, Et al, 2011, Mexico ( ) | Cross-sectional | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | B | MB | R | B | high | high |
Fuentes, Et al, 2015, Spain ( ) | Cross-sectional | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | MB | B | B | B | high | high |
Lazo, Et al, 2015, Peru ( ) | Analytical Cross-Sectional | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | MB | MB | MB | B | high | high |
Moreno, Et al, 2017, Colombia ( ) | Descriptive Cross-sectional | B | B | MB | B | B | B | B | B | B | high | high |
Nuño, Et al, 2009, Mexico ( ) | Analytical Cross-Sectional | B | B | MB | B | B | B | MB | MB | MB | high | high |
Quiles, Et al, 2014, Spain (2. 3) | Cross-sectional | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | high | high |
Silva, Et al, 2017, Mexico ( ) | Cross-sectional | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | B | B | B | high | high |
Sousa, Et al, 2013, Brazil ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | B | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | B | high | high |
Cogollo, Et al, 2012, Colombia ( ) | Cross-Sectional Analytical Observational | B | B | MB | MB | MB | MB | MB | B | B | high | high |
Caldera, Et al, 2019, Mexico ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | NA | B | medium | medium |
Reina, Et al, 2013, USA ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | B | R | NA | B | B | B | NA | B | medium | medium |
Laporta, Et al, 2020, Spain ( ) | Cross-sectional Quantitative, Descriptive, Retrospective | B | MB | B | B | B | B | B | B | NI | medium | medium |
Vara, Et al, 2011, Spain ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | B | B | B | R | R | B | B | B | medium | medium |
Sousa, Et al, 2014, Spain ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | B | MB | B | B | R | B | R | R | medium | medium |
Castaño, Et al, 2012, Colombia ( ) | Cross-sectional | B | NI | B | B | R | B | B | R | B | medium | medium |
Rutsztein, Et al, 2014, Argentina ( ) | Cross-sectional, Descriptive | B | R | B | R | R | R | B | R | B | Low | Low |
Note . Internal validity. It defines whether the study design allows minimizing biases and the confounding effect ( 12 ).
The Items used were:
2. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of participants are indicated, as well as the sources and selection methods.
3. The selection criteria are adequate to answer the question or the objective of the study.
4. The study population, defined by the selection criteria, contains an adequate spectrum of the population of interest.
5. An estimate was made of the size, the level of confidence or the statistical power of the sample to estimate the measures of frequency or association that the study intended to obtain.
6. The number of potentially eligible people is reported, those initially selected, those who accept and those who finally participate or respond; fifteen. Statistical analysis was determined from the beginning of the study.
16. The statistical tests used are specified and appropriate
17. Participant losses, lost data or others were correctly treated
18. The main possible confounding elements were taken into account in the design and in the analysis.
Assessment: MB=very good; B=good; R=regular; NA=not applicable; NI=no information.
Critical reading and assessment of methodological quality for cohort studies.
Main author, year and country | Study type | Question validity | Selection of subjects | Evaluation | Confounding factors | Statistic analysis | Overall rating of the study | Study description | Summary assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medium | |||||||||
Haynos, Et al, 2016, Spain ( , ) | Cohort | A | A | A | A | A | B | A | Yes |
Maezono, Et al, 2019, Japan / Finland ( ) | Cohort | D | B | B | A | A | B | B | Yes |
Batista, Et al, 2018, Croatia ( ) | Cohort | B | A | B | A | A | B | B | Yes |
Note . Cohort studies allow a direct determination of relative risk and allow calculation of the interval between exposure or risk factor and overall study disease ( 12 ). It was scored according to the validity of the question, selection of subjects, evaluation, confounding factors, statistical analysis, general assessment and description of the study. Rating: according to the author, the items were rated as follows: A: adequately; B: partially; C: improperly; D: I don’t know. For the purposes of this review, it was assumed that studies with adequate rating in 23-26 items were considered to be of high methodological level; medium level was attributed to studies with adequate rating in 19-22 items, and low methodological level was attributed to studies with adequate rating in 18 items or less.
Among the selected studies, 86.4% (n = 19) were cross-sectional design (15─33), 13.6% (n = 3) were cohort studies (34─36). Fifty-percent (n = 11) of the studies were conducted in Latin America (18, 20─22, 24─27, 31─33), 31.8% (n = 7) in Europe (15, 19, 23, 29, 30, 33, 34), 9% (n = 2) in Asia ( 16 , 34 ) 4.6% (n = 1) in Africa ( 17 ), and 4,6% (n = 1) in North America ( 28 ) ( Tab. 3 ).
Synthesis of the studies included in the review.
Main Author, Year and Country | Type of study | Population | Instrument | Family Factors | Biological factors | Sociocultural factors | Psychological factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Esteban, Et al, 2014, Spain. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 2,077 native Spanish and immigrant subjects from 13 to 17 years old. | SCOFF Eating Disorders Questionnaire. | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: immigrant adolescents living in the Madrid region and immigrant women. | Does not inform |
Shahyad, Et al, 2018, Israel. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 477 high school students aged 15 and 17. | Inventory of eating disorders. | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: Thin ideal internalization | Risk: Body dissatisfaction |
Yirga, Et al, 2016, Ethiopia. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 836 high school students between the ages of 12 and 19. | Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) | Risk: educational level of the mother | Risk: Being a woman. | Does not inform | Does not inform |
Altamirano, Et al, 2011, Mexico.CO ( ) | Cross-sectional | 1,982 women between the ages of 15 and 19 | Brief Questionnaire of Risky Eating Behaviors (CBCAR) | Does not inform | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: dissatisfaction with body image and low self-esteem. |
Fuentes, Et al, 2015, Spain. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 368 between 13 and 17 years | Body Image Dissatisfaction Assessment Scale. | Risk: Authoritarian and negligent family styles, family socialization styles and dissatisfaction with body image. | Does not inform | Does not inform | Does not inform |
Lazo, Et al, 2015, Peru. ( ) | Analytical cross-sectional | 483 female students between 12 and 17 years old. | Eating attitude test (EAT-26). | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: influence of the media. | Does not inform |
Moreno, Et al, 2017, Colombia. ( ) | Cross-sectional correlation | 104 students between 13 to 18 years old | Abbreviated Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26). Eating behavior questionnaire (FBQ). | Risk: Parental educational levels | Risk: female gender | Does not inform | Risk: Dissatisfaction with adolescent body image and concern about weight. |
Nuño, Et al, 2009, Mexico. ( ) | Analytical cross-sectional | 1,134 male and female adolescents. | Brief Questionnaire of Risky Eating Behaviors | Does not inform | Risk: being a woman | Does not inform | Risk: impulsivity, suicidal ideation and stress |
Quiles, Et al, 2014, Spain. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 2,142 male and female adolescents. | Eating Attitude Test (EAT-40). | Does not inform | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: self-oriented perfectionism. |
Silva, Et al, 2017, Mexico. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 392 women between the ages of 13 and 18. | Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-40) | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: belonging to the municipality of Pungarabato | Risk: submission |
Sousa, Et al, 2013, Brazil. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 580 adolescents of both sexes from 10 to 19 years | Food Attitudes Test Questionnaire (COMER-26) The EAT-26. Body shape quiz | Does not inform | Risk: fat percentage | Does not inform | Risk: dissatisfaction with body image |
Cogollo, Et al, 2012, Colombia. ( ) | Analytical cross-sectional | 2625 students between 10 and 20 years old | SCOFF questionnaire. | Does not inform | Risk: female | Does not inform | Risk: clinically important depressive symptoms and problematic alcohol use. |
Caldera, Et al, 2019, Mexico. ( ) | Cross-sectional | 988 adolescents of both sexes between 14 and 18 years old. | Brief Questionnaire of Risky Eating Behaviors (CBCAR). | Does not inform | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: Body dissatisfaction. |
Reina, Et al, 2013, USA ( ) | Cross-sectional | 90 adolescents from 13 to 17 years old | Infant Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ) | Does not inform | Risk: being a woman | Does not inform | Risk: Orientation to Appearance, concern about being overweight and eating in the absence of hunger. |
Laporta, Et al, 2020, Spain. ( ) | Descriptive Cross-sectional | 100 patients diagnosed with eating disorders according to DSM-IV-TR, aged between 13 and 16 years. | Eating Disorders Inventory-3, EDI-3. | Does not inform | Risk: being a woman | Does not inform | Risk: High perfectionism, greater severe depressive symptoms, body dissatisfaction and lower self-esteem. |
Vara, Et al, 2011, Spain. ( ) | Cross | 158 adolescents of both sexes. | Attitude test towards eating (EAT-26) | Does not inform | Risk: increased BMI. | Protector: correct self-image and hours of sport practiced | Does not inform |
Sousa, Et al, 2014, Spain. ( ) | Cross | 562 adolescents between 10 and 15 years old | Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26). | Does not inform | Risk: increased BMI | Does not inform | Risk: body dissatisfaction in women, the degree of psychological commitment to exercise. |
Castaño, Et al, 2012, Colombia. ( ) | Cross | 70 adolescents with anorexia aged 11 to 19 years | Eating Disorders Inventory-3 (EDI-3) | Does not inform | Risk: increased BMI | Risk: Internalization of the slim ideal. | Does not inform |
Haynos, 2016, Spain ( ) | Longitudinal cohort | Time I: 4,746 students between 1998-1999 from 11 to 18 years old. Time II: 2,516 students between 2003-2004 | EAT Project Survey | Risk: Family communication and poorer care | Does not inform | Risk: Weight-related teasing | Risk: High depression and low self-esteem. |
Maezono, Et al, 2019, Japan / Finland. ( ) | Cohort | 1,840 Japanese students (2011) and 1,135 Finnish students (2014) 13-15 years old. | Scale developed by Koskelainen, Sour Ander & Helenius | Does not inform | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: Dissatisfaction and concern with their bodies in Japanese and Finnish women and food distress in Finnish women. |
Batista, Et al, 2018, Croatia. ( ) | Cohort | 35 women with anorexia nervosa and 35 healthy between 12-18 years. | Eating Disorders Inventory-3 (EDI-3). | Does not inform | Does not inform | Risk: Internalization of the slim ideal. | Risk: interpersonal problems, affective problems and excess control, Low Self-esteem, Personal alienation, Interpersonal insecurity, Interpersonal alienation, Interoceptive deficits, Emotional dysregulation, Perfectionism and asceticism in women with anorexia. |
Different instruments were used to measure the factors associated with eating disorders. In 14.2% (n = 7) of the analysed studies, authors used the Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26) ( 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 30 , 31 ), 11% (n = 5) the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) ( 21 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 31 ), and 9.5% (n = 4) the Sociocultural Attitudes Questionnaire towards appearance-3 (SATAQ-3) ( 20 , 28 , 32 , 36 ). About 93% (n = 14) of the studies analysed risk factors and about 7% (n = 1) analysed correct self-image and hours of practiced sport as protective factors (B = 0.11; p = 0.047) ( 30 ). Regarding the risk factors, psychological risks were the most frequently analysed by the studies (71%). They included dissatisfaction with body image, low self-esteem, high depression, high perfectionism, stress, impulsivity, personal and interpersonal insecurity, emotional dysregulation, and ineffectiveness. About 14% of the studies analysed sociocultural factors such as alcohol use-related problematics, internalization of the thinness ideal, influence of media, ridicule related to weight, and being an immigrant adolescent. Also, 7.1% of the studies analysed family factors such as authoritarian family style, family functioning, poor communication, and family care. Lastly, 7.1% of the studies analysed biological factors such as being female. The complete description of the factors is summarized in Tab. 3 .
It was found that there was a greater number of studies that reported statistically significant relationships between factors such as body dissatisfaction, female gender, depression, low self-esteem, and higher body mass index (BMI) with eating disorders ( Tab. 4 ). In this sense, adolescents with those risk factors are more likely developing eating disorders.
Analysis by vote counting and sign test.
Vote Counting and Sign Test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Risk factor variables | Positive | Negative | P value | n = 22 |
Body dissatisfaction | 10 | 0 | 0.4159 | 10 |
Female gender | 5 | 0 | 0.0085 | 5 |
Depression | 5 | 0 | 0.0085 | 5 |
lower self-esteem | 3 | 2 | 0.0004 | 5 |
Higher BMI | 1 | 4 | 0.0022 | 5 |
In the present review, the results show that the main factors associated with eating disorders were psychological-type with a prevalence of the factor inherent the dissatisfaction with body image ( 16 ─ 18 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 32 , 35 ). Literature refers that dissatisfaction with body image increases significantly in adolescence due to environmental pressures like media (e.g., television, social networks, virtual and written press) ( 20 , 28 ). They represent channels of transmission of the current body aesthetic model and have a positive or negative impact on an adolescent’s body image. This is more common in women, as it was the biological factor reported in this review. However, the findings are consistent with other studies where dissatisfaction with body image occurs more frequently in females and is positively associated with BMI as a predictor of eating disorders. ( 37 , 38 ). Similarly, BMI appears directly related to dissatisfaction with one’s own body, namely the higher the BMI, the higher the body dissatisfaction ( 25 , 31 ─ 33 , 36 ). This association is more recurrent in female gender ( 17 , 22 , 26 , 28 , 30 ) as girls generally show greater instability of self-image, lower self-esteem and general dissatisfaction with their body, if compared to boys. In most studies, the sample studied was female ( 29 , 33 , 34 , 36 ). Other psychological factors were emerged from the review. They were: appearance orientation ( 28 ), high level of perfectionism ( 23 , 29 ), low self-esteem ( 18 , 29 , 33 , 34 , 36 ), impulsivity ( 22 ), stress, suicidal idea and depression ( 22 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 34 ), eat in the absence of hunger ( 28 ), concern about being overweight, submission ( 24 ), personal and interpersonal insecurity ( 29 , 36 ), and emotional dysregulation ( 33 ). A teenager with low self-esteem shows a negative attitude and evaluation towards himself. In fact, low self-esteem has been repeatedly considered as a relevant factor of vulnerability for the development of EDs. This evidence is supported by a previous review ( 39 ). It is also important to identify depressive and anxiety manifestations that have an impact on food restriction and concerns about figure and weight. The number of studies that supported the relationship between psychological factors and eating disorders was statistically significant according to the sign test.
Socio-cultural factors were analysed in 14.2% of the selected studies ( 15 , 16 , 20 , 24 , 26 , 32 , 36 ). The most frequently revealed were the internalization of the thin ideal followed by the influence of media, weight-related bullying , and immigrant adolescents. These sociocultural factors and the desire to conform to body aesthetic models promoted by media and advertising have a greater likelihood to developing perceptions of body dissatisfaction. Moreno ( 40 ) showed a very high relationship between the influence of the media and the presence of eating disorders in the adolescent population. This is a cultural problem that comes from long ago where the idea that a perfect body is thin and that this it is accepted by society. The media are very important agents in the transmission of messages about the desire for thinness that is constantly present in eating disorders; the media channel social pressure to be thin is obviously stronger on females than males ( 40 ).
A few studies analysed the relationship between family factors and eating disorders ( 19 , 21 , 34 ). However, family functioning, poor communication, family care, and authoritarian styles are factors described in the literature as predisposing to eating disorders by impacting the way adolescents worry about the amount of calories in food and obsessed with food and weight gain. In this sense, parents can play a protective role, but they can also represent a risk factor for their children’s eating behaviour, as adolescents regulate their behaviour according to their parental model from early childhood ( 40 , 41 ).
In this review, we found only one research that addressed protective factors related to physical exercise and correct ideas about body image. This could be due to the fact that research in the last two decades has focused on mitigating or controlling risk factors as the sole basis for interventions to prevent eating disorders in adolescents. However, protective factors make adolescents less vulnerable to the development of eating disorders and facilitate the achievement of physical and mental health, the quality of life of adolescents, the development of healthy habits and social welfare. Protective factors are susceptible to being modified and intensified and do not necessarily occur spontaneously or at random. In this sense, interventions focused on strengthening those factors could be effective to prevent eating disorders behaviours. This requires the development of research that identifies and analyses the protective factors that can be strengthened in adolescents ( 42 ─ 44 ).
Most of the studies included in this systematic review are cross-sectional and in a lower percentage are cohort studies. Spain is the country that has done the most research on the factors associated with eating disorders in adolescents, thus showing a particular interest in this topic. However, this review has shown that there is a plurality of studies in the scientific community from different sociocultural contexts. This can explain why there is variability of risk factors for eating behaviour, although body dissatisfaction is the most common factor emerged from the revision.
The limitations of the review reflect the heterogeneity of the study that does not allow to carry out a meta-analysis and statistic associations between factors. Although the vote count and the sign test allow giving an additional value to the narrative synthesis of the results, they are limited procedures to establish reliable statistical associations with data. In this sense, reviews around the subject with quantitative analysis procedures would be necessary.
Psychological factors were found to be the main risk factors directly related to eating disorders in adolescents. The most common were: dissatisfaction with body image, depression, low self-esteem and higher BMI. Being a woman was also identified as the most reported biological factor associated with eating disorders. These risk factors become relevant when guiding the creation of mental health promotion programs for adolescents and the prevention and early detection of the eating disorders in adolescents.
Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Keywords: social networking sites, eating disorder, social media, BMI, disordered eating behaviors. ... Communication and Mass Media Complete, and ProQuest Dissertations) on July 18th, 2020. The following search keywords for social network usage and disordered eating were chosen: ("social media" OR "social networking sites" OR "SNS ...
While preliminary studies investigating the association between social media and eating concerns focused on women in younger age groups, 19, 20, 42 this study included men and young adults ages 19 to 32 years. Interestingly, while there was a significant difference between men and women for both social media use and eating concerns, no ...
This study aims to investigate. associations between social media use and the presence of four subclinical disordered eating. behaviors: 1) emotional eating, 2) uncontrolled eating, 3) compensatory behaviors, and 4) binge eating symptoms. A sample consisting of 1729 adolescents aged between 12 and 16.
Thus, it would be beneficial to assess the relative impact of social media on eating disorders across these high-risk groups. Finally, prior evidence suggests that media penetration and adoption of 'western ideals' increases the risk of eating disorder pathology . Despite global scope, this review did not retrieve any studies from low ...
were recruited using social media platforms (i.e., Facebook) to complete a set of surveys. Partially consistent with hypotheses, results of the study suggested escapism and passing time motives were related to eating disorders symptoms, and escapism and appearance feedback motives were related to body dysmorphia symptoms.
Background Few studies have investigated how the plethora of contemporary social media (SM) platforms relate to, and influence eating disorder (ED) pathology, appearance ideals and pressure to conform to these ideals in youth. Methods In this study, 1558 girls (53%) and boys (47%), predominantly within the 16-19 age range, completed an online questionnaire assessing SM use and perceived ...
The study compared this data to a study that had been done. six years earlier and found bulimia nervosa-like behavior had increased from 1.0% in. 1980 to 3.2% in 1983 (Pyle et al., 1986). This research helps to support the idea that. eating disorders were on the increase before there was any social media contribution.
Objective Social media sites, such as Facebook, merge two factors that influence risk for eating disorders: media and peers. Previous work has identified cross-sectional and temporal associations ...
Globally, the prevalence of eating disorders has more than doubled in the past decade, from estimates of 3.5% to 7.8% (3). Forty percent of cases occur among adolescents aged between 15 and 19 (1). The prevalence of disordered eating behavior has been found to be substantial, ranging from 14% to 22% in epidemiological studies (4).
The media, including social media and blogs may be a catalyst for triggering body image issues such as Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) and eating disorders (Phillips, 2005, p. 178). Body Dysmorphic Disorder, BDD will be explained later. According to the National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Disorders, even the smallest amount of
Communication Commons, Public Relations and Advertising Commons, and the Social Media Commons Citation Wayles, K. (2020). Instagram and Eating Disorders: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Instagram on Disordered Eating Habits Among Young Girls. Graduate Theses and Dissertations Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/3595
The relationship between socialization through social media (SM) and eating disorders (EDs) is a serious problem for public health, largely affecting the mental health of younger people. This work aimed to identify scientific works addressing ED psychopathologies, studying their relationship with SM usage. In this systematic review, we analyze the available scientific evidence, thereby ...
Background Eating disorders are a group of heterogenous, disabling and deadly psychiatric illnesses with a plethora of associated health consequences. Exploratory research suggests that social media usage may be triggering body image concerns and heightening eating disorder pathology amongst young people, but the topic is under-researched as a global public health issue. Aim To systematically ...
Social media use, perfectionism, and disordered eating have all increased over the last decades. Some studies indicate that there is a relationship between self-presentation behaviors and being exposed to others' self-presentation on social media, and disordered eating. Studies also show that the relationship between focus on self-presentation and highly visual social media is stronger than ...
2. Background. College-aged women may be at particular risk for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating practices due to the unhealthy weight gain that often occurs during this life stage [3,31].The promotion of beauty ideals in the media disseminates disordered eating [40,41], drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction among female college students [].
Ozpolat, Alara, "Social media use, disordered eating, and body image in adolescent females: a systematic review of the literature" (2022). Theses and Dissertations. 1289. Adolescent females are especially at risk of developing eating disorders due to expectations surrounding body image, social pressures, and influence from peers.
Abstract. This thesis examines the impact of a social media network, Facebook, on body image and eating behaviors in an undergraduate female sample. The study is innovative in its subject area and creates a foundation for future research by presenting a general description of Facebook use specific to social comparison and evaluation. By ...
The Contribution of Social Media to Body Dissatisfaction, Eating Disorder Symptoms, and Anabolic Steroid Use Among Sexual Minority Men Scott Griffiths, PhD,1 Stuart B. Murray, PhD,2 Isabel Krug, PhD,1 and Siaˆn A. McLean, PhD3,4 Abstract Social media has been associated with body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptoms among young women
FRIDAY, Sept. 13, 2024 (HealthDay News) -- Excessive time spent on social media increases children's and teens' risk of developing an eating disorder, a new study warns.
Keywords: body image disorders, teenagers, social media, eating disorders, selfies, social comparisons, body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness. 1. Introduction. Body image is defined as one's perception, thoughts, and emotions revolving around one's own body. It is the depiction of one's body representation, including their mirror ...
As adolescents continue to spend more time on screens and social media, a new study finds that among 9-14-year-olds, excessive time online is associated with a higher risk of having eating ...
In the present review, the results show that the main factors associated with eating disorders were psychological-type with a prevalence of the factor inherent the dissatisfaction with body image (16 ─ 18, 21, 25, 27, 29, 31, 32, 35). Literature refers that dissatisfaction with body image increases significantly in adolescence due to ...
FRIDAY, Sept. 13, 2024 (HealthDay News) -- Excessive time spent on social media increases children's and teens' risk of developing an eating disorder, a new study warns. Each additional hour of ...