- Pre-registration nursing students
- No definition of master’s degree in nursing described in the publication
After the search, we collated and uploaded all the identified records into EndNote v.X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and removed any duplicates. Two independent reviewers (MCS and SA) screened the titles and abstracts for assessment in line with the inclusion criteria. They retrieved and assessed the full texts of the selected studies while applying the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements about the eligibility of studies were resolved by discussion or, if no consensus could be reached, by involving experienced researchers (MZ-S and RP).
The first reviewer (MCS) extracted data from the selected publications. For this purpose, an extraction tool developed by the authors was used. This tool comprised the following criteria: author(s), year of publication, country, research question, design, case definition, data sources, and methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. First, we extracted and summarized information about the case study design. Second, we narratively summarized the way in which the data and methodological triangulation were described. Finally, we summarized the information on within-case or cross-case analysis. This process was performed using Microsoft Excel. One reviewer (MCS) extracted data, whereas another reviewer (SA) cross-checked the data extraction, making suggestions for additions or edits. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion.
A total of 149 records were identified in 2 databases. We removed 20 duplicates and screened 129 reports by title and abstract. A total of 46 reports were assessed for eligibility. Through hand searches, we identified 117 additional records. Of these, we excluded 98 reports after title and abstract screening. A total of 17 reports were assessed for eligibility. From the 2 databases and the hand search, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles for data extraction. No further articles were included after the reference list screening of the included studies. A PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection and inclusion process is presented in Figure 1 . As shown in Tables 2 and and3, 3 , the articles included in this scoping review were published between 2010 and 2022 in Canada (n = 3), the United States (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), and Scotland (n = 1).
PRISMA flow diagram.
Characteristics of Articles Included.
Author | Contandriopoulos et al | Flinter | Hogan et al | Hungerford et al | O’Rourke | Roots and MacDonald | Schadewaldt et al | Strachan et al |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | Canada | The United States | The United States | Australia | Canada | Canada | Australia | Scotland |
How or why research question | No information on the research question | Several how or why research questions | What and how research question | No information on the research question | Several how or why research questions | No information on the research question | What research question | What and why research questions |
Design and referenced author of methodological guidance | Six qualitative case studies Robert K. Yin | Multiple-case studies design Robert K. Yin | Multiple-case studies design Robert E. Stake | Case study design Robert K. Yin | Qualitative single-case study Robert K. Yin Robert E. Stake Sharan Merriam | Single-case study design Robert K. Yin Sharan Merriam | Multiple-case studies design Robert K. Yin Robert E. Stake | Multiple-case studies design |
Case definition | Team of health professionals (Small group) | Nurse practitioners (Individuals) | Primary care practices (Organization) | Community-based NP model of practice (Organization) | NP-led practice (Organization) | Primary care practices (Organization) | No information on case definition | Health board (Organization) |
Overview of Within-Method, Between/Across-Method, and Data-Analysis Triangulation.
Author | Contandriopoulos et al | Flinter | Hogan et al | Hungerford et al | O’Rourke | Roots and MacDonald | Schadewaldt et al | Strachan et al |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Within-method triangulation (using within-method triangulation use at least 2 data-collection procedures from the same design approach) | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
Interviews | X | x | x | x | x | |||
Observations | x | x | ||||||
Public documents | x | x | x | |||||
Electronic health records | x | |||||||
Between/across-method (using both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study) | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
Interviews | x | x | x | |||||
Observations | x | x | ||||||
Public documents | x | x | ||||||
Electronic health records | x | |||||||
: | ||||||||
Self-assessment | x | |||||||
Service records | x | |||||||
Questionnaires | x | |||||||
Data-analysis triangulation (combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data) | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
Deductive | x | x | x | |||||
Inductive | x | x | ||||||
Thematic | x | x | ||||||
Content | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
Descriptive analysis | x | x | x | |||||
: | ||||||||
: | ||||||||
Deductive | x | x | x | x | ||||
Inductive | x | x | ||||||
Thematic | x | |||||||
Content | x |
The following sections describe the research question, case definition, and case study design. Case studies are most appropriate when asking “how” or “why” questions. 1 According to Yin, 1 how and why questions are explanatory and lead to the use of case studies, histories, and experiments as the preferred research methods. In 1 study from Canada, eg, the following research question was presented: “How and why did stakeholders participate in the system change process that led to the introduction of the first nurse practitioner-led Clinic in Ontario?” (p7) 19 Once the research question has been formulated, the case should be defined and, subsequently, the case study design chosen. 1 In typical case studies with mixed methods, the 2 types of data are gathered concurrently in a convergent design and the results merged to examine a case and/or compare multiple cases. 10
“How” or “why” questions were found in 4 studies. 16 , 17 , 19 , 22 Two studies additionally asked “what” questions. Three studies described an exploratory approach, and 1 study presented an explanatory approach. Of these 4 studies, 3 studies chose a qualitative approach 17 , 19 , 22 and 1 opted for mixed methods with a convergent design. 16
In the remaining studies, either the research questions were not clearly stated or no “how” or “why” questions were formulated. For example, “what” questions were found in 1 study. 21 No information was provided on exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory approaches. Schadewaldt et al 21 chose mixed methods with a convergent design.
A total of 5 studies defined the case as an organizational unit. 17 , 18 - 20 , 22 Of the 8 articles, 4 reported multiple-case studies. 16 , 17 , 22 , 23 Another 2 publications involved single-case studies. 19 , 20 Moreover, 2 publications did not state the case study design explicitly.
This section describes within-method triangulation, which involves employing at least 2 data-collection procedures within the same design approach. 6 , 7 This can also be called data source triangulation. 8 Next, we present the single data-collection procedures in detail. In 5 studies, information on within-method triangulation was found. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Studies describing a quantitative approach and the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review.
Five studies used qualitative data-collection procedures. Two studies combined face-to-face interviews and documents. 15 , 19 One study mixed in-depth interviews with observations, 18 and 1 study combined face-to-face interviews and documentation. 22 One study contained face-to-face interviews, observations, and documentation. 17 The combination of different qualitative data-collection procedures was used to present the case context in an authentic and complex way, to elicit the perspectives of the participants, and to obtain a holistic description and explanation of the cases under study.
All 5 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Face-to-face, in-depth, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The topics covered in the interviews included processes in the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers and facilitators to collaborative work in general practices. Two studies did not specify the type of interviews conducted and did not report sample questions. 15 , 18
In 2 studies, qualitative observations were carried out. 17 , 18 During the observations, the physical design of the clinical patients’ rooms and office spaces was examined. 17 Hungerford et al 18 did not explain what information was collected during the observations. In both studies, the type of observation was not specified. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.
In 3 studies, various qualitative public documents were studied. 15 , 19 , 22 These documents included role description, education curriculum, governance frameworks, websites, and newspapers with information about the implementation of the role and general practice. Only 1 study failed to specify the type of document and the collected data. 15
In 1 study, qualitative documentation was investigated. 17 This included a review of dashboards (eg, provider productivity reports or provider quality dashboards in the electronic health record) and quality performance reports (eg, practice-wide or co-management team-wide performance reports).
This section describes the between/across methods, which involve employing both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study. 6 , 7 This procedure can also be denoted “methodologic triangulation.” 8 Subsequently, we present the individual data-collection procedures. In 3 studies, information on between/across triangulation was found. 16 , 20 , 21
Three studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures. One study combined face-to-face interviews, documentation, and self-assessments. 16 One study employed semi-structured interviews, direct observation, documents, and service records, 20 and another study combined face-to-face interviews, non-participant observation, documents, and questionnaires. 23
All 3 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 16 , 20 , 23 Face-to-face and semi-structured interviews were conducted. In the interviews, data were collected on the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers to and facilitators of collaborative work in general practices.
In 2 studies, direct and non-participant qualitative observations were conducted. 20 , 23 During the observations, the interaction between health professionals or the organization and the clinical context was observed. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.
In 2 studies, various qualitative public documents were examined. 20 , 23 These documents included role description, newspapers, websites, and practice documents (eg, flyers). In the documents, information on the role implementation and role description of NPs was collected.
In 1 study, qualitative individual journals were studied. 16 These included reflective journals from NPs, who performed the role in primary health care.
Only 1 study involved quantitative service records. 20 These service records were obtained from the primary care practices and the respective health authorities. They were collected before and after the implementation of an NP role to identify changes in patients’ access to health care, the volume of patients served, and patients’ use of acute care services.
In 2 studies, quantitative questionnaires were used to gather information about the teams’ satisfaction with collaboration. 16 , 21 In 1 study, 3 validated scales were used. The scales measured experience, satisfaction, and belief in the benefits of collaboration. 21 Psychometric performance indicators of these scales were provided. However, the time points of data collection were not specified; similarly, whether the questionnaires were completed online or by hand was not mentioned. A competency self-assessment tool was used in another study. 16 The assessment comprised 70 items and included topics such as health promotion, protection, disease prevention and treatment, the NP-patient relationship, the teaching-coaching function, the professional role, managing and negotiating health care delivery systems, monitoring and ensuring the quality of health care practice, and cultural competence. Psychometric performance indicators were provided. The assessment was completed online with 2 measurement time points (pre self-assessment and post self-assessment).
This section describes data-analysis triangulation, which involves the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data. 6 Subsequently, we present within-case analysis and cross-case analysis.
Three studies combined qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. 16 , 20 , 21 Two studies involved deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. 20 , 21 One used deductive qualitative analysis. 16 The method of analysis was not specified in the studies. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in 3 studies. 16 , 20 , 23 The descriptive statistics comprised the calculation of the mean, median, and frequencies.
Two studies combined deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, 19 , 22 and 2 studies only used deductive qualitative analysis. 15 , 18 Qualitative data were analyzed thematically in 1 study, 22 and data were treated with content analysis in the other. 19 The method of analysis was not specified in the 2 studies.
In 7 studies, a within-case analysis was performed. 15 - 20 , 22 Six studies used qualitative data for the within-case analysis, and 1 study employed qualitative and quantitative data. Data were analyzed separately, consecutively, or in parallel. The themes generated from qualitative data were compared and then summarized. The individual cases were presented mostly as a narrative description. Quantitative data were integrated into the qualitative description with tables and graphs. Qualitative and quantitative data were also presented as a narrative description.
Of the multiple-case studies, 5 carried out cross-case analyses. 15 - 17 , 20 , 22 Three studies described the cross-case analysis using qualitative data. Two studies reported a combination of qualitative and quantitative data for the cross-case analysis. In each multiple-case study, the individual cases were contrasted to identify the differences and similarities between the cases. One study did not specify whether a within-case or a cross-case analysis was conducted. 23
This section describes confirmation or contradiction through qualitative and quantitative data. 1 , 4 Qualitative and quantitative data were reported separately, with little connection between them. As a result, the conclusions on neither the comparisons nor the contradictions could be clearly determined.
In 3 studies, the consistency of the results of different types of qualitative data was highlighted. 16 , 19 , 21 In particular, documentation and interviews or interviews and observations were contrasted:
Both types of data showed that NPs and general practitioners wanted to have more time in common to discuss patient cases and engage in personal exchanges. 21 In addition, the qualitative and quantitative data confirmed the individual progression of NPs from less competent to more competent. 16 One study pointed out that qualitative and quantitative data obtained similar results for the cases. 20 For example, integrating NPs improved patient access by increasing appointment availability.
Although questionnaire results indicated that NPs and general practitioners experienced high levels of collaboration and satisfaction with the collaborative relationship, the qualitative results drew a more ambivalent picture of NPs’ and general practitioners’ experiences with collaboration. 21
The studies included in this scoping review evidenced various research questions. The recommended formats (ie, how or why questions) were not applied consistently. Therefore, no case study design should be applied because the research question is the major guide for determining the research design. 2 Furthermore, case definitions and designs were applied variably. The lack of standardization is reflected in differences in the reporting of these case studies. Generally, case study research is viewed as allowing much more freedom and flexibility. 5 , 24 However, this flexibility and the lack of uniform specifications lead to confusion.
Methodologic triangulation, as described in the literature, can be somewhat confusing as it can refer to either data-collection methods or research designs. 6 , 8 For example, methodologic triangulation can allude to qualitative and quantitative methods, indicating a paradigmatic connection. Methodologic triangulation can also point to qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods, analysis, and interpretation without specific philosophical stances. 6 , 8 Regarding “data-collection methods with no philosophical stances,” we would recommend using the wording “data source triangulation” instead. Thus, the demarcation between the method and the data-collection procedures will be clearer.
Yin 1 advocated the use of multiple sources of evidence so that a case or cases can be investigated more comprehensively and accurately. Most studies included multiple data-collection procedures. Five studies employed a variety of qualitative data-collection procedures, and 3 studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures (mixed methods). In contrast, no study contained 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. In particular, quantitative data-collection procedures—such as validated, reliable questionnaires, scales, or assessments—were not used exhaustively. The prerequisites for using multiple data-collection procedures are availability, the knowledge and skill of the researcher, and sufficient financial funds. 1 To meet these prerequisites, research teams consisting of members with different levels of training and experience are necessary. Multidisciplinary research teams need to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of different data sources and collection procedures. 1
When using multiple data sources and analysis methods, it is necessary to present the results in a coherent manner. Although the importance of multiple data sources and analysis has been emphasized, 1 , 5 the description of triangulation has tended to be brief. Thus, traceability of the research process is not always ensured. The sparse description of the data-analysis triangulation procedure may be due to the limited number of words in publications or the complexity involved in merging the different data sources.
Only a few concrete recommendations regarding the operationalization of the data-analysis triangulation with the qualitative data process were found. 25 A total of 3 approaches have been proposed 25 : (1) the intuitive approach, in which researchers intuitively connect information from different data sources; (2) the procedural approach, in which each comparative or contrasting step in triangulation is documented to ensure transparency and replicability; and (3) the intersubjective approach, which necessitates a group of researchers agreeing on the steps in the triangulation process. For each case study, one of these 3 approaches needs to be selected, carefully carried out, and documented. Thus, in-depth examination of the data can take place. Farmer et al 25 concluded that most researchers take the intuitive approach; therefore, triangulation is not clearly articulated. This trend is also evident in our scoping review.
Few studies in this scoping review used a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, creating a comprehensive stand-alone picture of a case from both qualitative and quantitative methods is challenging. Findings derived from different data types may not automatically coalesce into a coherent whole. 4 O’Cathain et al 26 described 3 techniques for combining the results of qualitative and quantitative methods: (1) developing a triangulation protocol; (2) following a thread by selecting a theme from 1 component and following it across the other components; and (3) developing a mixed-methods matrix.
The most detailed description of the conducting of triangulation is the triangulation protocol. The triangulation protocol takes place at the interpretation stage of the research process. 26 This protocol was developed for multiple qualitative data but can also be applied to a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. 25 , 26 It is possible to determine agreement, partial agreement, “silence,” or dissonance between the results of qualitative and quantitative data. The protocol is intended to bring together the various themes from the qualitative and quantitative results and identify overarching meta-themes. 25 , 26
The “following a thread” technique is used in the analysis stage of the research process. To begin, each data source is analyzed to identify the most important themes that need further investigation. Subsequently, the research team selects 1 theme from 1 data source and follows it up in the other data source, thereby creating a thread. The individual steps of this technique are not specified. 26 , 27
A mixed-methods matrix is used at the end of the analysis. 26 All the data collected on a defined case are examined together in 1 large matrix, paying attention to cases rather than variables or themes. In a mixed-methods matrix (eg, a table), the rows represent the cases for which both qualitative and quantitative data exist. The columns show the findings for each case. This technique allows the research team to look for congruency, surprises, and paradoxes among the findings as well as patterns across multiple cases. In our review, we identified only one of these 3 approaches in the study by Roots and MacDonald. 20 These authors mentioned that a causal network analysis was performed using a matrix. However, no further details were given, and reference was made to a later publication. We could not find this publication.
Because it focused on the implementation of NPs in primary health care, the setting of this scoping review was narrow. However, triangulation is essential for research in this area. This type of research was found to provide a good basis for understanding methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. Despite the lack of traceability in the description of the data and methodological triangulation, we believe that case studies are an appropriate design for exploring new nursing roles in existing health care systems. This is evidenced by the fact that case study research is widely used in many social science disciplines as well as in professional practice. 1 To strengthen this research method and increase the traceability in the research process, we recommend using the reporting guideline and reporting checklist by Rodgers et al. 9 This reporting checklist needs to be complemented with methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. A procedural approach needs to be followed in which each comparative step of the triangulation is documented. 25 A triangulation protocol or a mixed-methods matrix can be used for this purpose. 26 If there is a word limit in a publication, the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix needs to be identified. A schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies can be found in Figure 2 .
Schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies (own work).
This study suffered from several limitations that must be acknowledged. Given the nature of scoping reviews, we did not analyze the evidence reported in the studies. However, 2 reviewers independently reviewed all the full-text reports with respect to the inclusion criteria. The focus on the primary care setting with NPs (master’s degree) was very narrow, and only a few studies qualified. Thus, possible important methodological aspects that would have contributed to answering the questions were omitted. Studies describing the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review due to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Given the various processes described for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation, we can conclude that triangulation in case studies is poorly standardized. Consequently, the traceability of the research process is not always given. Triangulation is complicated by the confusion of terminology. To advance case study research in nursing, we encourage authors to reflect critically on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation and use existing tools, such as the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix and the reporting guideline checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 to ensure more transparent reporting.
Acknowledgments.
The authors thank Simona Aeschlimann for her support during the screening process.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
A case selection based on representativeness may not generate revealing insights. Researchers, therefore, prefer information-oriented sampling, as opposed to...
If you found this useful, do remember to like psychology learners on facebook and subscribe by email., for 'supernotes' click here., for free ebook previews click here., for other ignou mapc material click here., for ignou related information and material click here., are you a mental health leader.
If you are a psychologist, psychiatrist, counselor, therapist, educator or a mental health institution administrator we can help you improve your client satisfaction and generate higher revenues.
With a focus on positive psychology and passion for spreading happiness in the world, The Real Happiness Center is helping people find out what happiness means to them, and how they can achieve it.
You have full access to this open access chapter
Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))
5069 Accesses
1 Citations
This chapter examines the criteria for selecting the cases analysed in this study. It explains the application of critical discourse analysis (CDA) as its principal empirical method. It discusses CDA methods and data treatment as well as the empirical analysis of CDA results. Finally, it compares and summarises the case selection criteria.
Four countries were compared: Switzerland, Uruguay, Cuba, and Colombia. These cases are also linked to the correlated variables in the quantitative model and to the sufficient conditions in the QCA. Cases were selected based on the “extreme case method”.
Each of the selected countries serves as a proxy of a larger group of countries (Latin American Strong Catholic, Secular, Communism, Protestant or mixed Old World.).
Critical discourse analysis (CDA) and religion constitute the qualitative method (micro-component). Sixty semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using memos and open coding.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Nested cases (at the opposite ends of a negative-to-positive scale) were selected from the quantitative database (Appendices 1–4 and Supplementary Materials) for more in-depth empirical (i.e. within-case) analysis. Four countries were compared: Switzerland, Uruguay, Cuba, and Colombia. These cases are also linked to the correlated variables in the quantitative model and to the sufficient conditions in the QCA.
Cases were selected based on the “extreme case method”. This consists of a selection of cases exemplifying extreme or unusual values of one of the variables of analysis. This approach is appropriate for exploratory research (Gerring & Seawright, 2008 ). The QCA cases (Sect. 16.3.3 ) already mentioned some of the variables that characterise these countries as extreme. Section 17.5 further illustrates and compares some of the variables considered. The cases also analyse within-country variations by region (whenever possible) (i.e. more Catholic versus more Protestant areas in Switzerland, Uruguay, Colombia). Such analysis may also be a source of inferential leverage. This approach combines within-case and cross-case causal inferences to elucidate the causal mechanisms giving rise to empirical regularities (Goertz, 2017 ). To offer the broadest possible comparability, multiple case studies were conducted rather than a single in-depth case study.
Switzerland has the highest competitiveness score in the world (World Economic Forum, 2016 ), one of the lowest homicide rates (0.6 (UNODC, 2013 )), and one of the lowest corruption indices in the world (85 (Transparency International, 2016 )). The country also enjoys widely acclaimed political, economic, and social stability. Its population and cantonal (i.e. federated) system exhibit a mixed distribution of Roman Catholics and Protestants, making it an ideal case to analyse and compare the historical influences of these denominations. Furthermore, the author developed this research in Switzerland, which facilitated accessing and gathering primary and secondary information.
Uruguay has the highest social progress score in Latin America (Porter et al., 2015 ). Besides Chile, it is also one of the most transparent countries in Latin America (Transparency International, 2016 ) and one of the continent’s most secular countries (Pew Research Center, 2014 ). These facts make Uruguay a worthwhile case for examining whether the factors that made Uruguay less religious have also made the country less corrupt and more equal. Consequently, this case provides vital information for understanding the interrelations between the variables under study.
Cuba is the only Communist country in the Americas. Communism and secularism are still in force in a country of contrasts: Cuba has one of the lowest homicide rates in the Americas (4.2 (UNODC, 2013 )) but also one of the continent’s lowest social progress indexes (Porter et al., 2015 ).
The Cuban government actively suppressed religion for decades. However, since the fall of the Soviet Union, the government has increased religious liberty by opening up political space for religious belief and practice. This opening has resulted in a dramatic flourishing of religious life in recent years (Goldenziel, 2009 ). Further, Cuba might also serve as a proxy of former socialist countries that have tried to eradicate the influence of religion on the state through adopting Marxist ideology. Cuba currently faces corruption levels comparable to former Soviet countries (Transparency International, 2016 ).
Colombia is a proxy country in Latin America. It is characterised by pervasive Roman Catholicism (i.e. with a valid Concordat, and one of the highest proportion of adults raised as Roman Catholics worldwide (Pew Research Center, 2014 )). Other dominant features include high levels of corruption (Transparency International, 2016 ), and one of the world’s lowest equality (World Bank, 2016 ) and safety rankings (World Economic Forum, 2017 ). Moreover, the author’s first-hand experience of working in government, civil society, and international agencies in his native country provided direct insight (along with his extensive network).
Each of the selected countries serves as a proxy of a larger group of countries (Latin American Strong Catholic, Secular, Communism, Protestant or mixed Old World.). Comparing Switzerland and Latin American countries illuminates how religion and prosperity indicators evolve differently within diverse political systems and against the background of different historical roots.
Nested (extreme) cases were chosen for more in-depth empirical, quantitative and QCA analysis (see Supplementary Materials). Table 17.1 summarises the four cases.
The qualitative approach adopted here concentrated on which patterns in particular (Silverman, 2005 , p. 9) might trigger the observed effects, and hence complemented the analysis of empirical correlations and QCA. The aim was to gain a greater understanding of the research problem (Zikmund, 2003 , p. 111), hence complementing the statistical and QCA analyses of the previous chapters, even if this approach implies that matters are “subjective in nature” (Zikmund, 2003 , p. 132).
Discourse analysis is central to this study, mainly because discourse, knowledge, and power are closely related (Burr, 2003 , p. 67; Carabine, 2001 , pp. 267–268). One especially fruitful type of discourse analysis was established by the French philosopher Michel Foucault. He suggested examining the interconnections between discourse, knowledge, and power based on his key concept of “genealogy”. This, as we will see, is related to institutions and prosperity.
Foucault ( 1972 ) developed an elaborate conceptual framework for discourse analysis and proposed a rigorous methodological system to underpin such analysis. However, he did not provide a “how to guide” to genealogy. Hence, methodologies and applications vary (Carabine, 2001 ).
Importantly, CDA cannot be applied mechanically (Hjelm, 2014 ). Nor does any universal CDA methodology exist (Fairclough, 2010 , p. 6). On the contrary, every analytical approach to discourse requires specific design (Hjelm, 2014 , p. 860). Oswick ( 2012 ) shares similar views and sees CDA as the only discursive method for considering ideology and power. CDA bridges cultural and linguistic studies in a critical approach. Thus, it enables researchers to adequately examine the role of religion in creating, transforming, reproducing, and sustaining inequalities (Hjelm, 2014 , pp. 855–58).
Equally importantly, CDA is ethically committed to exposing the processes through which discourses disseminate social structures that perpetuate hegemony (i.e. maintain and assert the interests of dominant groups or classes) (Fairclough and Wodak 1997 ; Wodak as cited in Heracleous, 2006 , p. 4) and suppress alternative constructions (Hjelm, 2014 , p. 860).
CDA is one of the most used methodologies for analysing language and texts in a wide range of fields, including management and organisation studies (The Editors, 2010 , p. 1192). However, studies employing CDA are scarce in the sociology of religion, and the valuable research potential of CDA has been underused as a result (Hjelm, 2014 ; Moberg, 2013 ). Therefore, Hjelm ( 2014 ) has strongly encouraged sociologists of religion to apply CDA, due to the obvious lack of critical approaches to religion that take inequality and hegemony seriously (p. 857).
Fairclough ( 1992 ), Fairclough ( 2010 ), and Gee ( 2011 ) have developed stringent guidelines for applying Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). According to Fairclough ( 2010 ) selecting a CDA methodology involves developing a theoretical framework relevant to a specific research project than choosing from an existing repertoire of methods (Fairclough, 2010 , p. 225).
What makes CDA unique is its division of analysis into three, cross-fertilising aspects: (1) Textual analysis, (2) Analysis of discourse practice, and (3) Analysis of social practice (including the relationship to existing hegemonies) (Hjelm, 2014 , p. 861; Fairclough, 1992 , p. 73). These categories are of central interest for this study as they help produce a comprehensive understanding of the impact of religion on the three levels of analysis:
The first level of analysis (textual) involves closely studying a range of texts such as political constitutions or Christian documents including The Holy Bible. Especially the Scriptures are central to analysing Christianity, as the text has remained largely unaffected by time for centuries (i.e. King James or Martin Luther versions). In contrast, Christian traditions have changed over time and vary among denominations.
The second level (analysis of discourse practice) considers the paradigms and public discourse of Protestants, Roman Catholic Church-State leaders, and government and civil society stakeholders.
The third level (analysis of social practice) explores the coherence between formal and de facto discourses, including the “commonsensical” language of social practices. Typically, producing documents for their own sake neither relates to nor explains social practice. Nevertheless, it is possible to analyse their coherence and influence in institutions. Comparing lived reality beyond formal discourses allows identifying patterns of social acceptance related to corruption and prosperity.
Sixty semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using memos and open coding. Protestant and Roman Catholic Church-State leaders, government, academics, and civil society stakeholders were interviewed in a snowball system between 2015 and 2017. Interviews were conducted in English, German, and French, in the German and French-speaking regions of Switzerland. Interviews in Latin America were conducted in Spanish and English (i.e. English speakers in the Colombian Caribbean). All interviews were translated into English before coding. For reasons of scope, not all the data or stakeholders interviewed appear in the main body of this book. Table 17.2 shows the total number of interviews conducted in each country.
Interviewees were mostly religious leaders or educated and informed stakeholders. Many stakeholders interviewed were also university professors or academic researchers. Protestants, Catholics, or non-religious interviewees were also asked about their different ideologies.
Before interviewing, stakeholders agreed to release their data on condition of anonymity. Consequently, the discussion offered in this book and the corresponding public datasets only contain stakeholders’ general institutional affiliations for comparison/triangulation purposes (e.g. government officer, university expert-lawyer, Catholic priest, Protestant preacher). Other sensitive data possibly enabling identification were omitted.
Two qualitative researchers independently coded the data to align code application and code definitions (a total of three independent researchers). Moreover, the author took position in a separate memorandum (Appendix 5).
Triangulation is essential for crosschecking information through multiple procedures and sources. It produces either corroboration or convergence in the case of agreement or divergence in the case of disagreement.
The notion of identifiable Roman Catholic or Protestant traditions requires gathering theoretical and historical data as well as qualitative data from interviewees. Although interviewees shared their perceptions of religious traditions, these perceptions do not provide robust evidence of historical linkages or ramifications. Present-day interviewees can only share their impressions of what their country has inherited from its religious background.
Therefore, findings were triangulated using a triple strategy: (1) Diverse stakeholder perspectives were included in each code (e.g. interviews with a government officer, a Catholic priest, a Protestant pastor); (2) public documents or discourses; and (3) other materials (e.g. historical, theoretical, textbooks).
The next four chapters provide background information on the religion–prosperity–institution nexuses for each of the four cases. Each case study includes charts that compare the different stakeholder principles identified in terms of (1) Prosperity, (2) Corruption, or (3) Church-State relations. Each chart is followed by a three-level CDA analysis.
Case details vary depending on historical importance, the information relevant for comparison, and scope. More information is deliberately provided for Switzerland, since this is the only European country compared and contrasted with the three selected Latin American countries. Such detailed background information and three empirical analyses concern prosperity, corruption, and church-state relations. Consequently, the case of Switzerland also draws more detailed conclusions from its three empirical analyses. By comparison, each Latin American case contains briefer background information and merely one empirical analysis (Uruguay: prosperity; Cuba: corruption; Colombia: prosperity). The respective conclusions are synthesised in Chap. 22 .
Each case begins by characterising the background information and the main features of the prosperity–corruption–religion nexus. This is followed by empirical analysis.
Beltrán, W. M. (2008). Aproximación histórico-interpretativa al proceso de diversificación religiosa en Colombia. In S. y. Grupo Interdisciplinario de Estudios de Religión, Mirada pluridisciplinar al hecho religioso en Colombia: Avances de investigación. Universidad de San Buenaventura.
Google Scholar
Beltrán, W. M., & Quiroga, J. D. (2017). Pentecostalismo y política electoral en Colombia (1991-2014). Colombia Internacional, 91 , 187–212.
Article Google Scholar
Blanco, M. Ó. (2008). La Nación católica durante la Regeneración (1886-1900): perspectivas historiográficas. Anuario Historia Regional y de las Fronteras, 13 (1), 157–180.
Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Carabine, J. (2001). Unmarried motherhood 1830-1990: A genealogical analysis. In S. T. M. Wetherell (Ed.), Discourse as data – A guide for analysis . Sage.
Crahan, M. E. (1979). Salvation through Christ or Marx: Religion in revolutionary Cuba. Special Issue:The Church and Politics in Latin America. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 21 (1), 156–184.
Crahan, M. E. (2017). Cuba: Religion and civil society. Social research, 84 (2), 383–405.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change . Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258–284). Sage.
Figueroa, H. (2016). La persistance des idées traditionalistes en Colombie. Religion et politique (1886-1952) . L’Harmattan.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge . Routledge.
Gee, J. (2011). How to do discourse analysis . Routledge.
Gerring, J., & Seawright, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative. Political Research Quarterly, 61 (2), 294.
Gill, A. (1998). Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the state in Latin America . Chicago University Press.
Gill, A. (2013). Religious pluralism, political incentives, and the origins of religious liberty. Global challenges. In A. Hertzke (Ed.), The future of religious freedom (pp. 107–127). Oxford University Press.
Goertz, G. (2017). Multimethod research, causal mechanisms, and case studies: An integrated approach . Princeton University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Goldenziel, J. (2009). Sanctioning faith: Religion, state, and U.S.-Cuban relations. Journal of Law & Politics, 25 (179), 179–210.
Heracleous, L. (2006). Discourse, interpretation, organization . Cambridge University Press.
Hjelm, T. (2014). Religion, discourse and power: A contribution towards a critical sociology of religion. Critical Sociology, 40 (6), 855–872.
Koonings, K., & Kruijt, D. (2004). Armed actors: Organised violence and state failure in Latin America . Zed Press.
Levine, D. (1981). Religion and politics in Latin America: The Catholic Church in Venezuela & Colombia. Princeton Legacy Library.
Moberg, M. (2013). First-, second-, and third-level discourse analytic approaches in the study of religion: Moving from meta-theoretical reflection to implementation in practice. Religion, 43 (1), 1–22.
Munevar, J. (2008). Transformación doctrinal y actitudinal de la participación política de las iglesias cristianas evangélicas en Colombia. In Grupo Interdisciplinario de Estudios de Religión, Sociedad y Política, GIERSP, Mirada pluridisciplinar al hecho religioso en Colombia: Avances de investigación (pp. 375–399) . Bogotá, Colombia.
Obinger, H. (2009). Religion and the consolidation of the Swiss Welfare State, 1848-1945. In P. Manow & K. van Kersbergen (Eds.), Religion, class coalitions and welfare states (pp. 176–209). Cambridge University Press.
Chapter Google Scholar
Open Doors. (2015). World Watch List (WWL). The 50 countries where persecution of Christians is most extreme. Retrieved from https://www.opendoorsusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/WWL2019_FullBooklet.pdf
Oswick, C. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive research. In G. S. (Ed.), The practice of qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges. Sage.
Pew Research Center. (2014). Religion in Latin America. Widespread Change in a Historically Catholic Region. Retrieved from https://www.pewforum.org/2014/11/13/religion-in-latin-america/
Porter, M., Stern, S., & Green, M. (2015). Social Progress Index 2015. Retrieved from https://www.socialprogress.org/?tab=2&code=NOR
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
The Editors. (2010). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) in context: Alternative perspectives on the analysis of discourse. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1192–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00942.x .
Transparency International. (2016). Corruption perceptions index 2016. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016
UNODC. (2013). Global study on homicide 2013: Trends, contexts, data . Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/GSH2013/2014_GLOBAL_HOMICIDE_BOOK_web.pdf
World Bank. (2016). GNI per capita . Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD?display=map
World Economic Forum. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2014–2015 (Full Data Edition) . The World Economic Forum.
World Economic Forum. (2017). The travel & tourism competitiveness report . World Economic Forum.
Zikmund, W. (2003). Business Research Methods (7th ed.). Thomson South-Western.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Swiss-Latin American Center (CLS-HSG), University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Jason García Portilla
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Supplementary material 17.1.
(DOCX 107 kb)
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Reprints and permissions
© 2022 The Author(s)
García Portilla, J. (2022). Case Selection Criteria, Methods, and Data Treatment. In: “Ye Shall Know Them by Their Fruits”. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78498-0_17
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78498-0_17
Published : 12 December 2021
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-78497-3
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-78498-0
eBook Packages : Economics and Finance Economics and Finance (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
A new integer model for selecting students at higher education institutions: preparatory classes of engineers as case study.
2. problem statement, 3. objective and methodology, 3.1. main objective of our work, 3.2. methodology, 3.2.1. organizational structure of higher education institutions.
4. the mathematical model of student selection problem, 4.1. general features of the model.
4.4.1. uniqueness constraints.
5. real case study, 5.1. presentation of the moroccan preparatory classes.
5.4. organizational structure of the preparatory classes.
6.1. computational environment, 6.2. results presentation, 6.3. comparative study, 7. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Basic Selection Rules |
---|
Poles | Stream | Abbreviation |
---|---|---|
Scientific and Technological | Mathematics, Physics, and Engineering science | MPSI |
Physics, Chemistry, and Engineering science | PCSI | |
Technology and Industrial Sciences | TSI | |
Economic and Commercial | Economics and Trade, Scientific option | ECS |
Economy and Trade, Technological option | ECT |
Streams | MPSI | PCSI | TSI | ECS | ECT | Total Number of Students | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Requests | Assigned | Requests | Assigned | Requests | Assigned | Requests | Assigned | Requests | Assigned | Requests | Assigned |
2014 | 26,356 | 1775 | 30,409 | 743 | 2096 | 484 | 19,736 | 70 | 20,066 | 789 | 98,663 | 3861 |
2015 | 25,515 | 1779 | 29,677 | 709 | 2147 | 520 | 22,544 | 62 | 21,051 | 978 | 100,934 | 4048 |
2016 | 31,060 | 1804 | 31,937 | 723 | 2556 | 551 | 23,513 | 68 | 24,177 | 937 | 113,243 | 4083 |
2017 | 22,323 | 1822 | 25,966 | 729 | 1887 | 557 | 20,306 | 62 | 18,306 | 1017 | 88,788 | 4187 |
2018 | 28,200 | 1858 | 26,933 | 682 | 1833 | 549 | 26,041 | 350 | 3812 | 713 | 86,819 | 4152 |
2019 | 33,366 | 1914 | 32,243 | 693 | 1922 | 600 | 30,892 | 383 | 4691 | 793 | 103,114 | 4383 |
2020 | 31,646 | 1899 | 31,518 | 693 | 2363 | 594 | 24,892 | 405 | 5276 | 743 | 95,695 | 4334 |
Center | Available Streams | Requests Number |
---|---|---|
High school Moulay Idriss (Fez) | MPSI | 4532 |
PCSI | 6725 | |
ECT | 799 | |
High school Mohmmed V (Casablanca) | MPSI | 7503 |
PCSI | 7974 | |
High school Moulay Ismael (Meknes) | ECS | 5290 |
ECT | 812 | |
Technical high school (Mohammedia) | MPSI | 7271 |
TSI | 728 |
Designation | Parameter | Signification |
---|---|---|
Streams | MPSI | Mathematics, Physics, and Engineering Sciences |
PCSI | Physics, Chemistry, and Engineering Sciences | |
TSI | Technology and Industrial Sciences | |
ECT | Economics and Trade, Technology Option | |
ECS | Economics and Trade, Scientific Option | |
Baccalaureate series | SM | Mathematical Sciences |
SX-SP | Experimental Sciences-Physical Sciences | |
SX-SVT | Experimental Sciences-Life and Earth Sciences | |
SX-SA | Experimental Sciences-Agricultural Sciences | |
SE | Economic Sciences | |
STE | Electrical Science and Technology | |
STM | Technology and Mechanical Sciences | |
SGC | Accounting Management Sciences |
Center | Stream | Capacity | Requests Number | Baccalaureate Series | Requests Number | Quotas of Seats | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High school Moulay Idriss (Fez) | MPSI | 140 | 15,281 | SM | 1328 | 90% | 126 |
SX-SP | 13953 | 10% | 14 | ||||
PCSI | 68 | 6724 | SM | 1234 | 40% | 27 | |
SX-PC | 5328 | 40% | 27 | ||||
SX-SVT and SX-SA | 162 | 20% | 14 | ||||
ECT | 72 | 799 | SE | 721 | 75% | 54 | |
SGC | 78 | 25% | 18 | ||||
High school Mohmmed V (Casablanca) | MPSI | 175 | 7544 | SM | 5474 | 90% | 157 |
SX-PC | 2070 | 10% | 18 | ||||
PCSI | 70 | 7975 | SM | 1346 | 40% | 28 | |
SX-PC | 6428 | 40% | 28 | ||||
SX-SVT and SX-SA | 201 | 20% | 14 | ||||
High school Moulay Ismael (Meknes) | ECS | 72 | 5137 | SM | 982 | 50% | 36 |
SX-SP | 4155 | 50% | 36 | ||||
ECT | 72 | 812 | SE | 728 | 75% | 54 | |
SGC | 84 | 25% | 18 | ||||
Technical high school (Mohammedia) | MPSI | 64 | 7271 | SM | 1830 | 90% | 57 |
SX-SP | 5441 | 10% | 7 | ||||
TSI | 96 | 727 | STE | 486 | 70% | 67 | |
STM | 241 | 30% | 29 |
Center | Stream | Capacity | Requests Number | Baccalaureate Series | Availability | Assigned Number | Assignment Rate | E-Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High school Moulay Idriss (Fez) | MPSI | 140 | 15,281 | SM | 126 | 126 | 100% | 153,561.72 |
SX-SP | 14 | 14 | 100% | |||||
PCSI | 68 | 6724 | SM | 27 | 27 | 100% | ||
SX-PC | 27 | 27 | 100% | |||||
SX-SVT and SX-SA | 14 | 13 | 92.85% | |||||
ECT | 72 | 799 | SE | 54 | 54 | 100% | ||
SGC | 18 | 18 | 100% | |||||
High school Mohmmed V (Casablanca) | MPSI | 175 | 7544 | SM | 157 | 157 | 100% | 86,278.98 |
SX-PC | 18 | 17 | 94.44% | |||||
PCSI | 70 | 7975 | SM | 28 | 28 | 100% | ||
SX-PC | 28 | 28 | 100% | |||||
SX-SVT and SX-SA | 14 | 14 | 100% | |||||
High school Moulay Ismael (Meknes) | ECS | 72 | 5137 | SM | 36 | 36 | 100% | 19,118.04 |
SX-SP | 36 | 36 | 100% | |||||
ECT | 72 | 812 | SE | 54 | 54 | 100% | ||
SGC | 18 | 18 | 100% | |||||
Technical high school (Mohammedia) | MPSI | 64 | 7271 | SM | 57 | 57 | 100% | 27,858.45 |
SX-SP | 7 | 6 | 85.71% | |||||
TSI | 96 | 727 | STE | 67 | 67 | 100% | ||
STM | 29 | 28 | 96.55% |
Center | Stream | Baccalaureate Series | Availability | Our Method | Traditional Method |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
High school Moulay Idriss (Fez) | MPSI | SM | 126 | 126 | 126 |
SX-SP | 14 | 14 | 14 | ||
PCSI | SM | 27 | 27 | 27 | |
SX-PC | 27 | 27 | 27 | ||
SX-SVT and SX-SA | 14 | 13 | 14 | ||
ECT | SE | 54 | 54 | 54 | |
SGC | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
High school Mohmmed V (Casablanca) | MPSI | SM | 157 | 157 | 157 |
SX-PC | 18 | 17 | 18 | ||
PCSI | SM | 28 | 28 | 28 | |
SX-PC | 28 | 28 | 28 | ||
SX-SVT and SX-SA | 14 | 14 | 14 | ||
High school Moulay Ismael (Meknes) | ECS | SM | 36 | 36 | 36 |
SX-SP | 36 | 36 | 36 | ||
ECT | SE | 54 | 54 | 54 | |
SGC | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
Technical high school (Mohammedia) | MPSI | SM | 57 | 57 | 57 |
SX-SP | 7 | 6 | 7 | ||
TSI | STE | 67 | 67 | 67 | |
STM | 29 | 28 | 29 |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Majdoub, S.; Loqman, C.; Boumhidi, J. A New Integer Model for Selecting Students at Higher Education Institutions: Preparatory Classes of Engineers as Case Study. Information 2024 , 15 , 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090529
Majdoub S, Loqman C, Boumhidi J. A New Integer Model for Selecting Students at Higher Education Institutions: Preparatory Classes of Engineers as Case Study. Information . 2024; 15(9):529. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090529
Majdoub, Soufyane, Chakir Loqman, and Jaouad Boumhidi. 2024. "A New Integer Model for Selecting Students at Higher Education Institutions: Preparatory Classes of Engineers as Case Study" Information 15, no. 9: 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090529
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Yet, while the existing qualitative literature on case selection offers a wide range of suggestions for case selection, most techniques discussed require in-depth familiarity of each case. Seven case selection procedures are considered, each of which facilitates a different strategy for within-case analysis.
Abstract Qualitative case study methodology enables researchers to conduct an in-depth exploration of intricate phenomena within some specific context. By keeping in mind research students, this article presents a systematic step-by-step guide to conduct a case study in the business discipline. Research students belonging to said discipline face issues in terms of clarity, selection, and ...
Case ‐study analysis focuses on one or several cases that are expected to provide insight into a larger population. This presents the researcher with a formidable problem of case selection: Which cases should she or he choose?
Yet, while the existing qualitative literature on case selection offers a wide range of suggestions for case selection, most techniques discussed require in-depth familiarity of each case. Seven case selection proce dures are considered, each of which facilitates a different strategy for within-case analysis.
Case-selection is the primordial task of the case study researcher, for in choosing cases one also sets out an agenda for studying those cases. This means that case selection and case analysis are intertwined to a much greater extent in case study research than in large-N cross-case analysis.
Abstract This chapter presents and critically examines best practices for case study research and case selection. In reviewing prominent case study criteria that prioritize objective, analytical needs of research design ("appropriateness"), the chapter argues that overlooked considerations of feasibility (including positionality, resources, and skills) and interest play equally important ...
Figure 3.1 gives a snapshot of the types of case studies and basic selection strategies and additionally demonstrates that distinguishing between the three dimensions introduced in Chapter 1 - research goals, levels of analysis, and variants of causal effects - is central for case studies and case selection. 2.
The article then draws attention to two ambiguities in case-selection strategies in case-study research. The first concerns the admixture of several case-selection strategies.
For this reason, one might conclude that the specification of selection criteria is potentially even more critical in comparative case study designs than statistical models.
While the matter of case selection is at the forefront of research on case study design, an analytical framework that can address it in a comprehensive way has yet to be produced. We develop such a framework and use it to evaluate nine common case selection methods. Our simulation-based results show that the methods of simple random sampling ...
Case Study Research. Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8EA, United Kingdom. One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA. 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia. 3143321, 3rd Floor, Plot 3, Splendor Forum, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi 3 110025, India. l, Singapore 238467Cambridge University Press is part of ...
Case selection and access is a context-situated process, which involves the dynamic interactions between researchers and the various parties in the process. Simply following the existing literature or listing a number of skills/stages are not sufficient in collecting in-depth qualitative research data.
The case selection procedures considered focus on typical, diverse, extreme, deviant, influential, most similar, and most different cases. For each case selection procedure, quantitative approaches are discussed that meet the goals of the approach, while still requiring information that can reasonably be gathered for a large number of cases.
A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research. A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods, but quantitative methods are sometimes also used.
Suggested Citation: "Chapter 3: Case Study Selection Criteria and Recommended Transportation Research Projects." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009.
PDF | This chapter examines the criteria for selecting the cases analysed in this study. It explains the application of critical discourse analysis... | Find, read and cite all the research you ...
Case studies are recommended to evaluate the implementation of new roles in (primary) health care, such as that of NPs. 1,5 Case studies on new role implementation can generate a unique and in-depth understanding of specific roles (individual), teams (smaller groups), family practices or similar institutions (organization), and social and ...
Abstract A case study is one of the most commonly used methodologies of social research. This article attempts to look into the various dimensions of a case study research strategy, the different epistemological strands which determine the particular case study type and approach adopted in the field, discusses the factors which can enhance the effectiveness of a case study research, and the ...
Below we have developed and expanded the results of that activity to provide a list of selection criteria upon which we hope you will comment. We will then amend the first draft in the light of your comments and re-circulate. We have grouped the selection criteria into 7 key headings. 1. Purpose of case study. 2.
Comparative Research Designs and Case Selection Each empirical field of study can be described by the cases ("units") analysed, the characteristics of cases ("variables") being considered and the number of times each unit is observed ("observations"). In macro-qualitative small-N situations, which is the domain we are concerned with here, both case selection and variable selection ...
The success of case studies depends on a clear definition of specific goals coupled with robust criteria for the nomination and selection of cases. Some possible criteria for the selection of case studies include: Proximity of other well penetrations Proximity to drinking water resources Geographic diversity.
The present study has been carried out in Kalutara DS Division, Integrated with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and geospatial techniques to find ...
Criteria for selecting a case study. Case study analysis focuses on a small number of cases expected to provide insight into a causal relationship across a larger population of cases. A case selection based on representativeness may not generate revealing insights. Researchers, therefore, prefer information-oriented sampling, as opposed to random sampling, for selecting case-study subjects ...
This chapter examines the criteria for selecting the cases analysed in this study. It explains the application of critical discourse analysis (CDA) as its principal empirical method. It discusses CDA methods and data treatment as well as the empirical analysis of CDA results. Finally, it compares and summarises the case selection criteria.
This study addresses the challenge of selecting outstanding students at higher education institutions under multiple constraints. We propose a novel integer programming solution to manage this process, formulating it as a constrained assignment problem with a maximization objective function. This function prioritizes the fair selection of students while respecting criteria such as academic ...
Observational studies, cohort studies, case reports, randomised control trials, clinical trials and multicentre studies were included. ... followed by a full-text assessment to ensure that these articles did indeed meet the eligibility criteria. Article selection was carried out by three independent reviewers with disagreements being resolved ...