Rogerian Essay Example: A Comprehensive Guide
Eseandre Mordi
- 24 Sep 2024
- 11 min read
The Rogerian essay is a unique form of argumentative writing that emphasizes understanding and empathy between opposing viewpoints. Named after psychologist Carl Rogers, this approach seeks to foster dialogue rather than conflict, making it particularly useful in discussions where emotions and differing perspectives can complicate agreement. By presenting a Rogerian essay example, we can explore the structure, purpose, and techniques that make this method effective for conveying complex ideas.
Understanding the Rogerian Approach
The essence of the Rogerian essay lies in its goal to establish common ground. Unlike traditional argumentative essays that often polarize viewpoints, the Rogerian approach encourages writers to acknowledge and validate the opposing side's perspective before presenting their argument. This method fosters a more respectful discourse and is particularly effective in sensitive topics, such as political debates, social issues, or ethical dilemmas.
The Benefit of Rogerian Essays in College Contexts
The application of Rogerian essays in college provides an environment for critical thinking beyond right or wrong answers. This essay structure develops empathy and hones students' ability to mediate conflicts—skills that are invaluable both academically and professionally.
Through Rogerian essays, students learn the importance of constructive communication—a valuable asset in our increasingly interconnected world. By mastering this technique, college learners can navigate complex disputes with an emphasis on collaboration rather than confrontation.
Key Components of a Rogerian Essay
For those aiming to craft a Rogerian essay in college, understanding its core structure is imperative. Unlike more direct argumentative styles, a Rogerian essay emphasizes empathy and acknowledges the validity of opposing arguments. This understanding fosters more nuanced discussions and often leads to mutually beneficial solutions.
- Introduction: Establish the Issue
Begin by introducing the topic, detailing why it is a matter of contention. For instance, consider a debate on whether colleges should adopt hybrid learning models post-pandemic. Your introduction should convey that there are legitimate arguments both supporting and opposing this shift in educational delivery.
- Opposing Viewpoint
Representation of the opposing stance is crucial. Here, you might explain how opponents of hybrid learning argue it dilutes the on-campus experience vital for student engagement. Importantly, present these views without bias, establishing your respect for their concerns.
- Context for Opposing Viewpoint
Acknowledge contexts where these opposing arguments hold weight. For example, cite studies or expert testimonies that highlight challenges regarding interaction and discipline in virtual environments. This acknowledgment builds trust and opens channels for dialogue.
- Your Standpoint
Now introduce your position—favoring hybrid models for benefits such as flexibility and accessibility in learning. Just like with the opposing view, support your perspective with evidence, ensuring a balanced presentation.
- Context for Your Standpoint
Provide scenarios under which hybrid models excel, such as accommodating students who manage part-time jobs or have disabilities, thus advocating inclusivity and personalized learning experiences. Use data and testimonials to reinforce your point effectively.
- Finding the Common Ground: Conclusion
Your conclusion is where the magic of a Rogerian essay lies. Craft a solution that appeals to both sides. Propose structured hybrid learning where certain classes are onsite while others offer flexibility online, ensuring a blend that respects traditional engagement while embracing modern advancements. Highlight how such tailored approaches can enhance overall educational outcomes.
Rogerian Essay Example
Topic: the use of social media in society.
Introduction Social media has transformed the way individuals communicate, share information, and connect with one another. While it has undoubtedly brought numerous benefits, such as fostering connections across distances and providing platforms for marginalized voices, it has also sparked significant concern regarding its impact on mental health and social interactions.
Presenting the Opposing Viewpoint On one hand, proponents of social media argue that it enhances communication, allowing individuals to connect with friends and family, network professionally, and access a wealth of information. They emphasize that social media platforms enable activism and the sharing of important social issues, empowering users to engage in discussions that can lead to societal change. Furthermore, studies have shown that social media can help reduce feelings of isolation, particularly for individuals who may struggle to connect in traditional settings.
Your Position Conversely, critics argue that social media can lead to negative mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, and feelings of inadequacy. The constant comparison to others' curated lives can create unrealistic expectations and exacerbate feelings of loneliness. Moreover, the addictive nature of these platforms can detract from face-to-face interactions and diminish the quality of real-world relationships. While social media has its benefits, it is crucial to address these adverse effects to create a healthier online environment.
Common Ground Despite these differing perspectives, both sides agree on the importance of communication and connection. Whether through social media or face-to-face interactions, fostering relationships and promoting understanding are fundamental to human experience. Both proponents and critics recognize the potential of social media to act as a tool for change and connection, highlighting the need for responsible usage that prioritizes mental health.
Conclusion In conclusion, the debate surrounding social media underscores the necessity of understanding and empathizing with diverse viewpoints. By acknowledging the benefits of social media while also addressing its drawbacks, we can work towards a more balanced approach that maximizes its positive impact. The Rogerian method encourages respectful dialogue and collaboration, paving the way for a more nuanced understanding of complex societal issues.
The Rogerian essay example illustrates the power of empathy and dialogue in addressing contentious topics. By fostering an understanding of opposing viewpoints and emphasizing common ground, writers can create a more inclusive and constructive discourse. This approach not only enhances the effectiveness of persuasive writing but also contributes to a more civil and respectful exchange of ideas in today’s polarized society.
Related articles
- First Draft Essay Examples: 4 Pages of Insightful Writing Tips
- Top Duke Muser Essay Examples: Inspiring Ideas for Your Application
- Essay on: Exploring Common App Examples for College Applications
- 500-Word College Essay Example: Achieving a Dream Through Resilience
- Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example: Unpacking the Power of Persuasion in Classic Speeches
Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work Essay
Introduction, the meaning of empathy, what it takes for one to express empathy, empathy in the society, empathy in the study book, how important is empathy, works cited.
Empathy is a virtue that is associated with human beings. It can be said to be one of the virtues that separate caring and uncaring people. This article examines the meaning of empathy in general. It shows what it means to have empathy as a human being. Empathy is also examined from the context of the book Do androids dream of electric sheep. The context of the story in this book reveals, in a special way, how empathy can be and cannot be expressed. The effects of expressing and not expressing empathy are also looked at. Over expression is specifically pointed out as being unhealthy.
Empathy has been defined as the ability to identify with a situation that another person is going through. It has also been defined as the ability to experience another person’s feelings (Empathy 1). When a person identifies with another person’s situation and tries to alleviate or mitigate the stressing factor in the situation, then one can say that he or she is expressing empathy. Acts of empathy may therefore include such actions as giving food to the needy in the society or providing shelter to those who are homeless. Generally, empathy has much to do with acts of kindness directed to people faced with situations which are hostile. It is kindness directed to people who need it based on how the donor or the person giving has perceived the situation at hand (Vincent 10).
The feeling of empathy comes up when there is a clear difference between the person being empathetic and the one who is the subject of empathy. Generally, two persons in the same unfortunate situation may not manifest empathy feelings towards each other. This is because of undergoing the same situation and neither of them may be in a position to help the other. But if two people are experiencing different unfortunate circumstances at the same time, they may be able console each other thus they may show empathy to each other. For instance, a bereaved person may show empathy to another person who has lost his or her house to fire.
Empathy can be examined as a feeling that pushes a person to do something good for another person particularly when the other person is in a bad situation. Basically, for one to express empathy therefore one needs to have feelings. One has to feel and be touched by what others are going through. Because empathy is just but a feeling, it does not really cost much, at least financially, to feel empathetic. However, acts of empathy may cost some resources depending on individual acts in question (Thagard 15).
What it takes to express empathy is therefore the ability to have the feeling first such that there is identification with the situation at hand and then being in a position to offer the help required in whole or in part. Empathy has to do with feelings and in cases where a person’s feelings have been hardened; empathy may not be manifested easily. A good illustration is those that propagate violence especially the leaders (Thagard 15).
Empathy can only be expressed between two person or more. For empathy to be expressed, one party (one person or persons) has to be in a disadvantaged or hostile position in order for the other to offer some assistance. It is worth noting that acts of empathy or helping others who are a hostile situation or in a position that need assistance should be on a voluntary basis. If one is coerced to help another person then such an action may not pass as an act of empathy. Empathy therefore has significantly to do with the willingness to help out of one’s own volition or free will.
There are many ways in which empathy can be expressed in the society. More often than not, people in the society are not endowed equally and therefore there are some who are less privileged. One way on expressing empathy therefore is by lending a hand to those who are less privileged. One way in which this can be done perfectly is through visiting children homes. Most of the children in these homes are orphans. By spending time with them, playing and talking with them, they get the feeling of being cared for. This is important as it enables them to develop self confidence. Apart from spending time with them one can gift them with items such as clothes.
One may also express empathy to the sick especially those admitted in hospitals. Patients admitted in hospital are more likely to undergo psychological distress especially because of being away from family members. Expressing empathy in this case can be done through a word of encouragement. Words of encouragement as gestures of empathy will also work well in a family setting especially when one of the members has been faced with an unfortunate situation, for instance, falling sick.
The study book Do androids dream of electric sheep depicts in a clear manner the meaning of empathy and how it is applied. The book starts by setting the conditions right for the empathy to be exercised. The whole world is destroyed and only a handful of living things survive. Human beings as well as animals are left vulnerable and in a state where they need each other. Empathy in this book is shown as a biological trait which no android, even the most intelligent, can imitate. This is because emotions cannot be programmed into a computer (Dick 1).
I am of the view that it is the human beings who are the subject of empathy in this book. This may sound reversal but taking into consideration the joy and satisfaction that humans get from keeping animals, it turns out to be true. To keep an animal is prestigious and those who cannot afford animals are forced to find pleasure in keeping electric animals. This act of keeping electric animals as seen in the book can only point out to the fact that humans have some desire within themselves to offer care that if not satisfied disturbs them. Animals come in to satisfy that need by accepting to be cared for by the humans.
Technically, as the animals are being shown empathy by being cared for they are also playing a major role of showing empathy to humans by allowing themselves to be cared for. Indeed in the book, empathy is viewed as a two way traffic action whereby one party is willing to show empathy to another party and the other party is willing to accept the actions of empathy advanced by the first party.
Empathy is a vital virtue to human beings. It can be said to be among the virtues that help to make the society better. As was noted in the book, empathy differentiates us from machines. It gives us the kindness that makes human beings different from animals. Empathy also helps to unite people as they identify with one another in various struggles that they undergo (Waal 1).
Although it has been generally agreed that empathy is important, there is a caution that it should be expressed carefully in some cases. Caregivers need to express empathy when attending to patients. However, it has been noted that expression of empathy too much may make the patients vulnerable to be hurt (Hojat 12). Too much expression of empathy in such a scenario may also make the patients feel that their situations are dire. Such a feeling will obviously do more harm than any good (Eisenberg 1).
Empathy has been viewed as the ability to identify with a situation that another person is undergoing. Empathy significantly has to do with feelings. Empathy is shown when a person is in an unfortunate situation that may need consoling. In most cases, empathy propels a person to do something about the situation in question. The feeling of empathy will therefore push one into action, however in some cases there are no actions which might be done. Therefore, empathy does not change because one has not responded to the prompt to act.
It has also been discussed that it only takes feeling to have empathy. Since one does not need to act in order to show empathy, it can be argued that almost every person can express empathy. Those who may not display empathy are those who have hardened their emotions. Showing empathy has a positive effect on those who receive it.
Empathy consoles them and psychologically strengthens them to keep on fighting. This is especially the case for patients. However, it has also been cautioned against too much expression of empathy as it may create the impression that a person is in such a desperate situation that he or she might not recover. This will psychologically affect the person in a very negative manner.
Dick, Philip. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep . New York: Orion, 2010. Print.
Eisenberg, Nancy. Empathy and Its Development . New York: CUP Archive, 1990. Print.
Empathy. Empathy vs. Sympathy . DIFFEN, 2013.
Hojat, Mohammad. Empathy in Patient Care: Antecedents, Development, Measurement, and Outcomes . New York: Springer, 2007. Print.
Thagard, Paul. The Brain and the Meaning of Life . New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2010. Print.
Vincent, Steve. Being Empathic: A Companion for Counselors and Therapists . New York: Radcliffe Publishing, 2005. Print.
Waal, Franz. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society . New Jersey: Crown Publishing Group, 2010. Print.
- Philosophy Role in Education
- Pragmatic, Coherence and Correspondent Truth Theories
- Application Development Using Android Studio
- Do Androids Have a Theme?
- Concept of Kind in Nursing Practice
- Heroism as Dedication to Principles - Philosophy
- "Meno" a Socratic Dialogue by Plato - Philosophy
- Philosophical Approach to Freedom and Determinism
- An Analysis of Ceramic Vessel Form and Function
- Camus and Nagel Views on the Human Life - Philosophy
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2020, May 7). Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-of-empathy/
"Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work." IvyPanda , 7 May 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-of-empathy/.
IvyPanda . (2020) 'Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work'. 7 May.
IvyPanda . 2020. "Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work." May 7, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-of-empathy/.
1. IvyPanda . "Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work." May 7, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-of-empathy/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Empathy: What Is It and How Does It Work." May 7, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-of-empathy/.
- To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
- As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
- As a template for you assignment
IMAGES
VIDEO