× | × | DGHAL | | × | × |
Hemorrhoidectomy | | ×-selected | × | × | ×-emergency |
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy | | | × | × |
| | | |
Johanson [ ] | IC, IS and RBL | 5 (863) | RBL had greater long-term efficacy, but led to a higher incidence of post-treatment pain. IC was associated with both fewer and less severe complications |
MacRae [ ] | IC, IS, RBL, manual anal dilation and hemorrhoidectomy | 18 (1952) | Hemorrhoidectomy was more effective than manual anal dilation and RBL, but more pain and complications. RBL had greater efficacy than IS for treating grade I-III hemorrhoids, with no difference in the complication rate. Patients treated with IC or IS were more likely to require further therapy |
Shanmugam [ ] | RBL hemorrhoidectomy | 3 (202) | Hemorrhoidectomy was superior to RBL for the long-term treatment of grade III, not grade II, hemorrhoids. Although hemorrhoidectomy had more pain, higher complications and more time off work, patient satisfaction and acceptance of the two treatment modalities seems to be similar |
Alonso-Coello [ ] | Fiber no therapy | 7 (378) | Fiber reduced the risk of bleeding and persisting by 50% and 47%, respectively, but it had no significant effect on pain and prolapse |
Alonso-Coello [ ] | Oral flavonoids placebo or no therapy | 14 (1514) | Flavonoids reduced the risk of bleeding, pain, persisting symptoms and recurrence by 67%, 65%, 58% and 47%, respectively |
Ho [ ] | Closed open hemorrhoidectomy | 6 (686) | Closed hemorrhoidectomy had faster wound healing but longer operating time. There was no difference in treatment efficacy, pain, complication and hospital stay between the two operations |
Nienhuijs [ ] | Conventional ligasure hemorrhoidectomy | 12 (1142) | Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy resulted in significantly shorter operative time, less early postoperative pain, earlier recovery, without any difference in recurrent bleeding or incontinence |
Burch [ ] | Hemorrhoidectomy SH | 27 (2279) | SH had less postoperative pain, shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, and shorter convalescence, but a higher rate of prolapse and reintervention for prolapse |
Giordano [ ] | Hemorrhoidectomy SH (minimum follow-up of 1 yr) | 15 (1201) | SH had a significantly higher incidence of recurrences and additional operations |
Gan [ ] | Various TCMH another TCMH or Western medicines | 9 (1822) | TCMHs significantly improved overall symptoms and bleeding as well as decreased the inflammation of perianal mucosa |
Since shearing action of passing hard stool on the anal mucosa may cause damage to the anal cushions and lead to symptomatic hemorrhoids, increasing intake of fiber or providing added bulk in the diet might help eliminate straining during defecation. In clinical studies of hemorrhoids, fiber supplement reduced the risk of persisting symptoms and bleeding by approximately 50%, but did not improve the symptoms of prolapse, pain, and itching[ 26 ]. Fiber supplement is therefore regarded as an effective treatment in non-prolapsing hemorrhoids; however, it could take up to 6 wk for a significant improvement to be manifest[ 33 ]. As fiber supplements are safe and cheap, they remain an integral part of both initial treatment and of a regimen following other therapeutic modalities of hemorrhoids.
Lifestyle modification should also be advised to any patients with any degree of hemorrhoids as a part of treatment and as a preventive measure. These changes include increasing the intake of dietary fiber and oral fluids, reducing consumption of fat, having regular exercise, improving anal hygiene, abstaining from both straining and reading on the toilet, and avoiding medication that causes constipation or diarrhea.
Oral flavonoids : These venotonic agents were first described in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency and edema. They appeared to be capable of increasing vascular tone, reducing venous capacity, decreasing capillary permeability[ 34 ], and facilitating lymphatic drainage[ 35 ] as well as having anti-inflammatory effects[ 36 ]. Although their precise mechanism of action remains unclear, they are used as an oral medication for hemorrhoidal treatment, particularly in Europe and Asia. Micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF), consisting of 90% diosmin and 10% hesperidin, is the most common flavonoid used in clinical treatment[ 27 ]. The micronization of the drug to particles of less than 2 μm not only improved its solubility and absorption, but also shortened the onset of action. A recent meta-analysis of flavonoids for hemorrhoidal treatment, including 14 randomized trials and 1514 patients, suggested that flavonoids decreased risk of bleeding by 67%, persistent pain by 65% and itching by 35%, and also reduced the recurrence rate by 47%[ 27 ]. Some investigators reported that MPFF can reduce rectal discomfort, pain and secondary hemorrhage following hemorrhoidectomy[ 37 ].
Oral calcium dobesilate : This is another venotonic drug commonly used in diabetic retinopathy and chronic venous insufficiency as well as in the treatment of acute symptoms of hemorrhoids[ 38 ]. It was demonstrated that calcium dobesilate decreased capillary permeability, inhibited platelet aggregation and improved blood viscosity; thus resulting in reduction of tissue edema[ 39 ]. A clinical trial of hemorrhoid treatment showed that calcium dobesilate, in conjunction with fiber supplement, provided an effective symptomatic relief from acute bleeding, and it was associated with a significant improvement in the inflammation of hemorrhoids[ 40 ].
Topical treatment: The primary objective of most topical treatment aims to control the symptoms rather than to cure the disease. Thus, other therapeutic treatments could be subsequently required. A number of topical preparations are available including creams and suppositories, and most of them can be bought without a prescription. Strong evidence supporting the true efficacy of these drugs is lacking. These topical medications can contain various ingredients such as local anesthesia, corticosteroids, antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs[ 41 ].
Topical treatment may be effective in selected groups of hemorrhoidal patients. For instance, Tjandra et al [ 42 ] showed a good result with topical glyceryl trinitrate 0.2% ointment for relieving hemorrhoidal symptoms in patients with low-grade hemorrhoids and high resting anal canal pressures. However, 43% of the patients experienced headache during the treatment. Perrotti et al [ 43 ] reported the good efficacy of local application of nifedipine ointment in treatment of acute thrombosed external hemorrhoids. It is worth noting that the effect of topical application of nitrite and calcium channel blocker on the symptomatic relief of hemorrhoids may be a consequence of their relaxation effect on the internal anal sphincter, rather than on the hemorrhoid tissue per se where one might anticipate a predominantly vasodilator effect.
Apart from topical medication influencing tone of the internal anal sphincter, some topical treatment targets vasoconstriction of the vascular channels within hemorrhoids such as Preparation-H ® (Pfizer, United States), which contains 0.25% phenylephrine, petrolatum, light mineral oil, and shark liver oil. Phenylephrine is a vasoconstrictor having preferential vasopressor effect on the arterial site of circulation, whereas the other ingredients are considered protectants. Preparation-H is available in many forms, including ointment, cream, gel, suppositories, and medicated and portable wipes[ 44 ]. It provides temporary relief of acute symptoms of hemorrhoids, such as bleeding and pain on defecation.
Sclerotherapy: This is currently recommended as a treatment option for first- and second-degree hemorrhoids. The rationale of injecting chemical agents is to create a fixation of mucosa to the underlying muscle by fibrosis. The solutions used are 5% phenol in oil, vegetable oil, quinine, and urea hydrochloride or hypertonic salt solution[ 22 ]. It is important that the injection be made into submucosa at the base of the hemorrhoidal tissue and not into the hemorrhoids themselves; otherwise, it can cause immediate transient precordial and upper abdominal pain[ 45 ]. Misplacement of the injection may also result in mucosal ulceration or necrosis, and rare septic complications such as prostatic abscess and retroperitoneal sepsis[ 46 ]. Antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for patients with predisposing valvular heart disease or immunodeficiency because of the possibility of bacteremia after sclerotherapy[ 47 ].
Rubber band ligation: Rubber band ligation (RBL) is a simple, quick, and effective means of treating first- and second-degree hemorrhoids and selected patients with third-degree hemorrhoids. Ligation of the hemorrhoidal tissue with a rubber band causes ischemic necrosis and scarring, leading to fixation of the connective tissue to the rectal wall. Placement of rubber band too close to the dentate line may cause severe pain due to the presence of somatic nerve afferents and requires immediate removal. RBL is safely performed in one or more than one place in a single session[ 48 ] with one of several commercially available instruments, including hemorrhoid ligator rectoscope[ 49 ] and endoscopic ligator[ 50 ] which use suction to draw the redundant tissue in to the applicator to make the procedure a one-person effort.
The most common complication of RBL is pain or rectal discomfort, which is usually relieved by warm sitz baths, mild analgesics and avoidance of hard stool by taking mild laxatives or bulk-forming agents. Other complications include minor bleeding from mucosal ulceration, urinary retention, thrombosed external hemorrhoids, and extremely rarely, pelvic sepsis. The patients should stop taking anticoagulants for one week before and two weeks after RBL.
Infrared coagulation: The infrared coagulator produces infrared radiation which coagulates tissue and evaporizes water in the cell, causing shrinkage of the hemorrhoid mass. A probe is applied to the base of the hemorrhoid through the anoscope and the recommended contact time is between 1.0-1.5 s, depending on the intensity and wavelength of the coagulator[ 51 ]. The necrotic tissue is seen as a white spot after the procedure and eventually heals with fibrosis. Compared with sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation (IRC) is less technique-dependent and avoids the potential complications of misplaced sclerosing injection[ 22 ]. Although IRC is a safe and rapid procedure, it may not be suitable for large, prolapsing hemorrhoids.
Radiofrequency ablation: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively new modality of hemorrhoidal treatment. A ball electrode connected to a radiofrequency generator is placed on the hemorrhoidal tissue and causes the contacting tissue to be coagulated and evaporized[ 52 ]. By this method, vascular components of hemorrhoids are reduced and hemorrhoidal mass will be fixed to the underlying tissue by subsequent fibrosis. RFA can be performed on an outpatient basis and via an anoscope similar to sclerotherapy. Its complications include acute urinary retention, wound infection, and perianal thrombosis. Although RFA is a virtually painless procedure, it is associated with a higher rate of recurrent bleeding and prolapse[ 53 ].
Cryotherapy: Cryotherapy ablates the hemorrhoidal tissue with a freezing cryoprobe. It has been claimed to cause less pain because sensory nerve endings are destroyed at very low temperature. However, several clinical trials revealed that it was associated with prolonged pain, foul-smelling discharge and a high rate of persistent hemorrhoidal mass[ 54 ]. It is therefore rarely used.
There are two meta-analyses comparing outcomes among the three common non-operative treatments of hemorrhoids (sclerotherapy, RBL and IRC)[ 23 , 24 ]. These two studies demonstrated that RBL resulted in the fewest recurrent symptoms of hemorrhoids and the lowest rate of retreatment, but that it led to a significantly higher incidence of pain following the procedure. Hence, RBL could be recommended as the initial non-operative modality for treatment of grade I-III hemorrhoids. In a British survey of almost 900 general and colorectal surgeons[ 55 ], RBL was the most common procedure performed, following by sclerotherapy and hemorrhoidectomy.
An operation is indicated when non-operative approaches have failed or complications have occurred. Different philosophies regarding the pathogenesis of hemorrhoidal disease creates different surgical approaches (Table 3 ).
| | |
Sliding anal cushions | Hemorrhoids develop when the supporting tissues of the anal cushions disintegrate or deteriorate | Hemorrhoidectomy, plication |
Rectal redundancy | Hemorrhoidal prolapse is associated with an internal rectal prolapse | Stapled hemorrhoidopexy |
Vascular abnormality | Hyperperfusion of arteriovenous plexus within anal cushion results in the formation of hemorrhoids | Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation |
Hemorrhoidectomy: Excisional hemorrhoidectomy is the most effective treatment for hemorrhoids with the lowest rate of recurrence compared to other modalities[ 24 ]. It can be performed using scissors, diathermy[ 56 , 57 ], or vascular-sealing device such as Ligasure (Covidien, United States)[ 29 , 58 ] and Harmonic scalpel (Ethicon Endosurgery, United States)[ 59 , 60 ]. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy can be performed safely under perianal anesthetic infiltration as an ambulatory surgery[ 61 , 62 ]. Indications for hemorrhoidectomy include failure of non-operative management, acute complicated hemorrhoids such as strangulation or thrombosis, patient preference, and concomitant anorectal conditions such as anal fissure or fistula-in-ano which require surgery[ 18 ]. In clinical practice, the third-degree or fourth-degree internal hemorrhoids are the main indication for hemorrhoidectomy.
A major drawback of hemorrhoidectomy is postoperative pain[ 62 ]. There has been evidence that Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy results in less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, faster wound healing and convalescence compared to scissors or diathermy hemorrhoidectomy[ 63 - 65 ]. Other postoperative complications include acute urinary retention (2%-36%), postoperative bleeding (0.03%-6%), bacteremia and septic complications (0.5%-5.5%), wound breakdown, unhealed wound, loss of anal sensation, mucosa prolapse, anal stricture (0%-6%), and even fecal incontinence (2%-12%)[ 66 - 69 ]. Recent evidence has suggested that hemorrhoidal specimens can be exempt from pathological examination if no malignancy is suspected[ 70 ].
Plication: Plication is capable of restoring anal cushions to their normal position without excision. This procedure involves oversewing of hemorrhoidal mass and tying a knot at the uppermost vascular pedicle. However, there are still a number of potential complications following this procedure such as bleeding and pelvic pain[ 21 ].
Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: A new technique based on doppler-guided ligation of the terminal branches of the superior hemorrhoidal artery was introduced in 1995 as an alternative to hemorrhoidectomy[ 71 ]. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) has become increasingly popular in Europe. The rationale of this treatment was later supported by the findings from vascular studies[ 3 , 10 ], which demonstrated that patients with hemorrhoids had increased caliber and arterial blood flow of the terminal branch of the superior rectal arteries. Therefore, ligating the arterial supply to hemorrhoidal tissue by suture ligation may improve hemorrhoidal symptoms. DGHAL is most effective for second- or third-degree hemorrhoids. Notably, DGHAL may not improve prolapsing symptoms in advanced hemorrhoids. Short-term outcomes and 1-year recurrence rates of DGHAL did not differ from those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy[ 72 ]. Given the fact that there is the possibility of revascularization and recurrence of symptomatic hemorrhoids, further studies on the long-term outcomes of DGHAL are still required[ 73 ].
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) has been introduced since 1998[ 74 ]. A circular stapling device is used to excise a ring of redundant rectal mucosa proximal to hemorrhoids and resuspend the hemorrhoids back within the anal canal. Apart from lifting the prolapsing hemorrhoids, blood supply to hemorrhoidal tissue is also interrupted. A recent meta-analysis comparing surgical outcomes between SH and hemorrhoidectomy, which included 27 randomized, controlled trials with 2279 procedures, showed that SH was associated with less pain, earlier return of bowel function, shorter hospital stay, earlier return to normal activities, and better wound healing, as well as higher degree of patient satisfaction[ 30 ]. However, in the longer term, SH was associated with a higher rate of prolapse[ 30 , 31 , 75 ]. Considering the recurrence rate, cost of stapling device and potential serious complications including rectovaginal fistula[ 76 ] and rectal stricture[ 77 , 78 ], SH is generally reserved for patients with circumferential prolapsing hemorrhoids and having ≥ 3 lesions of advanced internal hemorrhoids.
These two recent surgical options, DGHAL and SH, aim to correct the pathophysiology of hemorrhoids by reducing blood flow to the anal canal (dearterialization) and eliminating anorectal mucosal prolapse (reposition), respectively. A recent retrospective study of 18-mo outcomes of DGHAL ( n = 51) and SH ( n = 63) for grade III hemorrhoids revealed that both procedures were safe and effective. DGHAL had less pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster functional recovery; however, it was associated with higher recurrence rate and lower patient satisfaction rating[ 79 ]. Lately, a smaller prospective trial comparing DGHAL to SH for grade II-III hemorrhoids showed similar short-term and long-term outcomes of the two procedures[ 80 ]. Nevertheless, patients undergoing DGHAL returned to work quicker, and had fewer complication rates than those receiving SH.
Therapeutic treatment of hemorrhoids ranges from dietary and lifestyle modification to radical surgery, depending on degree and severity of symptoms. Although surgery is an effective treatment of hemorrhoids, it is reserved for advanced disease and it can be associated with appreciable complications. Meanwhile, non-operative treatments are not fully effective, in particular those of topical or pharmacological approach. Hence, improvements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of hemorrhoids are needed to prompt the development of novel and innovative methods for the treatment of hemorrhoids.
Peer reviewer : Rasmus Goll, MD, Department of Gastro-enterology, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038 Tromso, Norway
S- Editor Gou SX L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Li JY
| , Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RK. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. . 1994; :946-954. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Suárez JA, Gómez LG, Morgado PJ. Histoclinical basis for a new classification of hemorrhoidal disease. . 1988; :474-480. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Gruber H, Conrad F, Eder J, Wedel T, Zelger B, Engelhardt V, Lametschwandtner A, Wienert V, Böhler U. Revised morphology and hemodynamics of the anorectal vascular plexus: impact on the course of hemorrhoidal disease. . 2009; :105-113. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Hou YC, Pan AC. Endoglin (CD105) expression in the development of haemorrhoids. . 2004; :107-112. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Kochhar R, Nagi B, Mehta SK. Rectosigmoid varices and other mucosal changes in patients with portal hypertension. . 1991; :1185-1189. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . The nature of haemorrhoids. . 1975; :542-552. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . The nature and cause of haemorrhoids. . 1975; :574-575. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Wang ZJ, Zhao B, Yang XQ, Wang D, Wang JP, Tang XY, Zhao F, Hung YT. [Pathologic change of elastic fibers with difference of microvessel density and expression of angiogenesis-related proteins in internal hemorrhoid tissues]. . 2005; :56-59. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Park SJ, Yun CH, Chung AS. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor metastasis and angiogenesis. . 2003; :128-137. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Bodner G, Gruber H, Conrad F, Fritsch H, Margreiter R, Bonatti H. The vascular nature of hemorrhoids. . 2006; :1044-1050. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Kevelaitis E, Vainorius E, Simonsen U. [Role of nitric oxide and other endothelium-derived factors]. . 2003; :333-341. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Peck RJ, Shorthouse AJ, Read NW. Haemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushions. . 1992; :592-594. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 45] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Haemorrhoidectomy and disordered rectal and anal physiology in patients with prolapsed haemorrhoids. . 1995; :596-598. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. . 1990; :380-386. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Redding W, Rickett JW. The prevalence of haemorrhoids. A preliminary survey. . 1970; :78-80. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Sonnenberg A. Constipation is not a risk factor for hemorrhoids: a case-control study of potential etiological agents. . 1994; :1981-1986. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Siproudhis L, Allaert FA. Risk factors associated with hemorrhoidal symptoms in specialized consultation. . 2005; :1270-1274. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . . 2004; :1461-1462. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Mann CV. Classification of internal haemorrhoids: a discussion paper. . 2004; :226-232. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Harikumar R, Sunilkumar K, Thomas V. Videoanoscopy: useful technique in the evaluation of hemorrhoids. . 2008; :e312-e317. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Scholefield JH. Management of haemorrhoids. . 2008; :380-383. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Person B, Wexner SD. Hemorrhoidal disease: A comprehensive review. . 2007; :102-117. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Rimm A. Optimal nonsurgical treatment of hemorrhoids: a comparative analysis of infrared coagulation, rubber band ligation, and injection sclerotherapy. . 1992; :1600-1606. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. . 1995; :687-694. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, Campbell KL, Steele RJ, Loudon MA. Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids. . 2005;CD005034. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Mills E, Heels-Ansdell D, López-Yarto M, Zhou Q, Johanson JF, Guyatt G. Fiber for the treatment of hemorrhoids complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2006; :181-188. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Zhou Q, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Mills E, Heels-Ansdell D, Johanson JF, Guyatt G. Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoids. . 2006; :909-920. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Buettner PG. Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. . 2007; :135-143. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids. . 2009;CD006761. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Epstein D, Sari AB, Weatherly H, Jayne D, Fox D, Woolacott N. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. . 2009; :233-243; discussion 243. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 81] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. . 2009; :266-272. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 119] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Liu YD, Wang Y, Yang J. Traditional Chinese Medicine herbs for stopping bleeding from haemorrhoids. . 2010;CD006791. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Nielsen ML, Hansen JB, Knudsen JT. High-fiber diet reduces bleeding and pain in patients with hemorrhoids: a double-blind trial of Vi-Siblin. . 1982; :454-456. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . Pharmacologic properties of Daflon 500 mg. . 1994; :524-530. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . A lymphatic function of Daflon 500 mg. . 1995; :36-38. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Nicolaides AN. Flavonoids. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy of Daflon 500 mg in patients with chronic venous insufficiency and related disorders. . 1994; :419-428. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Nicolai AP. Clinical use of micronized purified flavonoid fraction for treatment of symptoms after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. . 2004; :704-710. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . Drug treatment of haemorrhoids. . 2005; :1481-1491. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 39] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Ruiz E. Calcium dobesilate: pharmacology and future approaches. . 1998; :357-360. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Görgül A, Tatlicioğlu E, Ayoğlu F, Unal S. Efficacy of calcium dobesilate in treating acute attacks of hemorrhoidal disease. . 2001; :1489-1495. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . Nonsurgical treatment of hemorrhoids. . 2002; :290-294. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Tan JJ, Lim JF, Murray-Green C, Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ. Rectogesic (glyceryl trinitrate 0.2%) ointment relieves symptoms of haemorrhoids associated with high resting anal canal pressures. . 2007; :457-463. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Antropoli C, Molino D, De Stefano G, Antropoli M. Conservative treatment of acute thrombosed external hemorrhoids with topical nifedipine. . 2001; :405-409. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Maykel JA. Diagnosis and management of symptomatic hemorrhoids. . 2010; :17-32, Table of Contents. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 61] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Motson R, Clifton M. The immediate response to injection therapy for first-degree haemorrhoids. . 1988; :146-148. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Seow-Choen F. Septic complications after treatment of haemorrhoids. . 2003; :147-156. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Eckardt VF, Suermann RB, Karbach U, Ewe K. Bacteremia after proctoscopy and hemorrhoidal injection sclerotherapy. . 1981; :373-374. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . Comparative study between multiple and single rubber band ligation in one session for bleeding internal, hemorrhoids: a prospective study. . 2002; :345-350. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . Solo operated haemorrhoid ligator rectoscope. A report on 200 consecutive bandings. . 1997; :42-44. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Jensen DM, Chavalitdhamrong D. Randomized prospective study of endoscopic rubber band ligation compared with bipolar coagulation for chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids. . 2009; :2057-2064. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Matos D, Saad SS. Rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. . 2008; :102-106. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| . Radiofrequency ablation and plication: a non-resectional therapy for advanced hemorrhoids. . 2005; :66-72. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| . Radiofrequency coagulation versus rubber band ligation in early hemorrhoids: pain versus gain. . 2004; :232-237. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Goodreau JJ, Fouty WJ. Operative hemorrhoidectomy versus cryodestruction. . 1979; :10-16. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Wilson RG, Loudon MA. The contemporary management of haemorrhoids. . 2002; :450-454. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Tsang C, Lee YL, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and complications between diathermy and scissors for closed hemorrhoidectomy. . 1998; :1418-1420. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Ho YH, Ang HG, Goh HS. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids. . 1992; :1165-1169. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 82] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , You JF. Current status of surgical treatment for hemorrhoids--systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2010; :488-500. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Sturrock PR, Sun MY, McDade J, Singla S, Paterson CA, Counihan TC. Simple harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy utilizing local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation: a safe and rapid alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy. . 2007; :801-806. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Chung CC, Tsui KK, Li MK. A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. . 2005; :344-348. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Lohsiriwat D. Ambulatory anorectal surgery under perianal anesthetics infiltration: analysis of 222 cases. . 2007; :278-281. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Lohsiriwat V. Outpatient hemorrhoidectomy under perianal anesthetics infiltration. . 2005; :1821-1824. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Cadeddu F, Muzi MG, Nigro C, Farinon AM. Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. . 2010; :85-93. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Cornish J, Darzi AW, Papagrigoriadis S, Tekkis PP. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes of randomized controlled trials of LigaSure vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy. . 2007; :1209-1218; discussion 1218. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Buettner PG, Ho YH. Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids. . 2008; :229-239. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| . Complications of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. . 2001; :131-133. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Abcarian H. Benign Anorectal: Hemorrhoids. . New York: Springer 2007; 156-177. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Salle E, Lécuyer J, Brunet C, Sarles JC, Sastre B. [Early postoperative morbidity after hemorrhoidectomy using the Milligan-Morgan technic. A retrospective studies of 1,134 cases]. . 1997; :243-247. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Wesarachawit W, Tantiphlachiva K, Atithansakul P, Sahakitrungruang C, Rojanasakul A. A comparison of early postoperative results between urgent closed hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed thrombosed hemorrhoids and elective closed hemorrhoidectomy. . 2009; :1610-1615. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Vongjirad A, Lohsiriwat D. Value of routine histopathologic examination of three common surgical specimens: appendix, gallbladder, and hemorrhoid. . 2009; :2189-2193. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 49] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Hasuda K, Ikeda T. A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. . 1995; :610-613. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L. Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. . 2004; :176-180. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Gangner Y. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: early and three-year follow-up results in 100 consecutive patients. . 2008; :945-949. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 84] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| . Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: A new procedure. . . [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. . 2008; :147-160. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 150] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Giardiello C, Prota C. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Complications and 2-year follow-up. . 2006; :753-760. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Stanley JD, Moore RA. Obstructed defecation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a report of four cases. . 2010; :622-625. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] |
| , Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A, Milito G, Dodi G, Mascagni D, Orsini S. Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? . 2002; :83-88. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 117] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Itah R, Skornick Y, Greenberg R. Outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for grade III hemorrhoids. . 2011; :267-271. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| , Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G. Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. . 2011; :67-73. [ ] [ ] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 95] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
- ALL AUTHOR RESOURCES
- Appeals and Complaints
- Article Processing Charge
- Common Usage of Quantities and Units
- Copyright License Agreement
- Create an Account
- Criteria for Authorship
- Ethics Committee of Baishideng
- Guidelines for Authors
- Guidelines for Manuscript Type and Related Ethics Documents
- Guidelines on Methods of Post-Publication Debate
- Language Editing Process for Manuscripts Submitted by Non-Native Speakers of English
- Open-Access
- Policies on Handle Allegations from Whistleblowers
- Publication Misconduct
- Quality of Publications
- Steps for Submitting Manuscripts
- ALL PEER-REVIEWER RESOURCES
- Guidelines for Manuscript Decision
- Peer-Review Process
- Peer-Reviewer Tracking for Manuscripts
- Reviewer Acknowledgment
- REFERENCE CITATION ANALYSIS
- Find a Category
- Find a Journal
- Find a Scholar
- Find an Academic Assistant
- Find an Article
- Find an Article PDF
- Today's Articles
- ALL PUBLISHER RESOURCES
- About the BPG
- Company Registration
- Editorial Office
- ICMJE Conformity
- Management Team
- Permissions
- Privacy Policy
- Publication Ethics
- Publishing Credentials
- Revenue Sources
- Special Statement
- Terms of Use
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
External Hemorrhoids: These are under the skin Laser treatment for piles around the anus and can be painful. Common symptoms include: Itching and irritation in the anal area. Pain or discomfort, especially during sitting or bowel movements. Swelling or a lump near the anus. Diagnosis: Diagnosing hemorrhoids typically involves a combination of ...
Presentation Transcript. HEMORRHOIDS Nga Vu, MD PGY3 Emory Family Medicine 11/18/10. Causes • chronic straining secondary to constipation • diarrhea • tenesmus • long periods trying to defecate • common during pregnancy and child-birth. Anatomy • Dentate line, divides hemorrhoids anatomically into internal (above the junction) and ...
In this review, the authors will discuss the anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of hemorrhoid disease. Keywords: hemorrhoids, rectal bleeding, thrombosis, management. Hemorrhoid disease is the fourth leading outpatient gastrointestinal diagnosis, accounting for ∼3.3 million ambulatory care visits in the United ...
In present day practice, application of Kshara is found to be a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective method for management of internal hemorrhoids. Compilation of case reports and clinical studies are needed to standardize the treatment protocol and define outcome measures. In this way, comprehensive treatment guidelines can be formulated.
The burden of hemorrhoids. There has only been one national survey of hemorrhoids in the US and that survey was conducted in 1989. In a digestive disease supplement to the National Health Interview Survey, participants were asked if a doctor had ever diagnosed them with hemorrhoids. 6 The survey data were extrapolated to the US population. An estimated 23 million adults (13% US population ...
Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb. 98(2):380-6. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. Constipation is not a risk factor for hemorrhoids: a case-control study of potential etiological agents. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Nov. 89(11):1981-6.
Understand that there are different presentations of haemorrhoids. Haemorrhoids are clusters of vascular tissue, smooth muscle and connective tissue arranged in three columns along the anal canal [1] . In healthy individuals, they act as cushions that help maintain continence [1] . Although haemorrhoids — or 'piles' as they are otherwise ...
Why hemorrhoids become symptomatic is uncertain. In an Austrian observational study involving adults who underwent routine screening colonoscopy, approximately 39% had visibly enlarged ...
Hemorrhoids are swollen veins in the anus or lower rectum. They are pretty common in adults and although they are mildly uncomfortable, they can sometimes be too painful and might need surgical intervention. Speak all about this procedure with this template for a clinical case! The design is super cool and modern and it has everything you need ...
PDF | On May 30, 2018, Jin-hyuk Lee and others published A Case Study of Four Hemorrhoid Patients Treated by Korean Medical Treatment | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
1 Introduction. The understanding of anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of hemorrhoids is fundamental to selecting an appropriate treatment of hemor-rhoids, improving treatment outcomes, develop-ing novel methods for managing hemorrhoids, and preventing recurrent diseases. This chapter deals with some essential knowledge and current views ...
Abstract. This review discusses the pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, classification, clinical evaluation, and current non-operative and operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoids are defined as the symptomatic enlargement and distal displacement of the normal anal cushions. The most common symptom of hemorrhoids is rectal ...
You will also learn about the different causes of hemorrhoids formation: Sliding anal cushions/ Loss of fixation: Presenting symptom: Prolapse. Rectal redundancy/ Internal rectal prolapse: Presenting symptom: Circumferential prolapse. Vascular abnormalities: Presenting symptom: Bleeding. A few slides are dedicated to Hemorrhoids Pathophysiology ...
Free Google Slides theme, PowerPoint template, and Canva presentation template. Hemorrhoids are swollen and inflamed veins in the rectum or anus. They can occur both internally, affecting the lining of the rectum and externally, under the skin around the anus. While there can be numerous causes for hemorrhoids, including chronic constipation or ...
Objective: this study aims to access efficacy of Homoeopathic medicines in cases of Hemorrhoids. Result: the use of constitutional homoeopathic remedy has a beneficial effect in cases of Hemorrhoids. Conclusion: The findings of the above study concluded that 94% of the cases responded well to the indicated Homoeopathic similimum.
Telephone: +66-0-24198077 Fax: +66-0-24115009. This review discusses the pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, classification, clinical evaluation, and current non-operative and operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoids are defined as the symptomatic enlargement and distal displacement of the normal anal cushions.