the art of case study research. thousand oaks

We’re fighting to restore access to 500,000+ books in court this week. Join us!

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

The art of case study research

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

1,401 Previews

30 Favorites

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

No suitable files to display here.

PDF access not available for this item.

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by station47.cebu on June 21, 2023

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

The Art of Case Study Research

Qualitative Research in Business & Management | Case Study Research

• Request Instructor Sample
• DESCRIPTION

"The book is a concise and very readable guide to case study research. It includes a good introduction to the theoretical principles underlying qualitative research, and discusses a wide range of qualitative approaches, namely naturalistic, holistic, ethnographic, phenomenological and biographic research methods. . . . Stake offers some useful practical advice, for example, on how to conduct in-depth interviews, how to analyze qualitative data and on report writing. . . . Stake writes in a rather unusual and very personal style but this makes the text very readable. The author's obvious passion for research makes the text even more enjoyable and stimulating. . . . the book. . . seems particularly appropriate for those undertaking this type of research in the fields of education and social policy."

--Ivana La Valle in Social Research Association News

"It is gratifying to encounter a text so cogently advocating the case study method (aka: naturalistic fieldwork) as a legitimate knowledge-enhancing endeavor."

--Sala Horowitz in Academic Library Book Review

"I have just finished a qualitative case study based almost entirely on interviews with engineering students. The two sources on which I depended most heavily were Robert E. Stake's The Art of Case Study Research and Harry F. Wolcott's Writing Up Qualitative Research. I have heard others sing the praises of different works and I have referred to them, but favor the two mentioned."

--Terry C. Hall, Ed.D., Independent Scholar

"This volume consolidates and elaborates ideas Robert E. Stake articulated in earlier journal articles and chapters in a form that is useful and readily accessible to both practitioners and students of educational research methods. His unusually personal presentation style and innovative format for sharing practical tips through authentic examples add to the main treasure of his new book: an incomparable sophistication about research epistemology and practice. . . . His vast experience in the field and in the classroom and his intimate knowledge of the literature intersect, providing the reader with an unusually comprehensive portrayal of a specialized field. . . . The Art of Case Study Research is a significant contribution to research methodology literature and will undoubtedly assume quick popularity as a text."

--Linda Mabry, Indiana University, Bloomington

"A concise and readable primer for doing case study research, the fruit of many years of experience and wisdom. Robert E. Stake's book is also valuable as a genuine attempt to integrate, rather than pick arguments with, the best there is of contending approaches to qualitative inquiry."

--A. Michael Huberman, Harvard University and The Network, Inc.

" The Art of Case Study Research is most useful to novices in qualitative inquiry. I could see using it in combination with other texts or readings in an introductory course to qualitative research methods or in a research methods survey course. Because of its readable style and wellspring of examples and helpful suggestions, both graduate and undergraduate students will find the book useful. Researchers seeking to more fully understand the case study approach as perceived by one of the leaders in case study work will also pick up this book. Researchers and policymakers in social service agencies may also be interested because case studies are increasingly part of evaluation strategies."

--Corrine Glesne, University of Vermont

Unique in his approach and style, Robert E. Stake draws from naturalistic, holistic, ethnographic, phenomenological, and biographic methods to present a disciplined, qualitative exploration of case study methods. In his exploration, Stake uses and annotates an actual case, at Harper School, to demonstrate to readers how to resolve some of the major issues of case study research; for example, how to select the case (or cases) that will maximize learning, how to generalize what is learned from one case to another, and how to interpret what is learned from a case. Uniquely, this book legitimizes direct interpretation as a case research method. It covers such topics as the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to case study; data gathering, including document review; coding, sorting, and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher, triangulation; and reporting a case study. Also provided are end-of-chapter "workshops" that help students focus on new concepts.

Written with the inspired and thought-provoking style of a master storyteller, The Art of Case Study Research helps readers chart their way through the labyrinth of case study research.

Available formats

Introduction, session timeout.

• LOGIN & Help

The Art of Case Study Research

• Educational Psychology

Research output : Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book

Library availability

Related links.

• Link to publication in WorldCat

Fingerprint

• Case Study Research Keyphrases 100%
• Case Study Arts and Humanities 100%
• Stakes Arts and Humanities 66%
• Document Review Keyphrases 50%
• Direct Interpretation Keyphrases 50%
• Triangulation Keyphrases 50%
• Case Study Method Keyphrases 50%
• Pattern Analysis Keyphrases 50%

T1 - The Art of Case Study Research

AU - Stake, Robert E.

N2 - Unique in his approach and style, Robert E. Stake draws from naturalistic, holistic, ethnographic, phenomenological, and biographic methods to present a disciplined, qualitative exploration of case study methods. In his exploration, Stake uses and annotates an actual case, at Harper School, to demonstrate to readers how to resolve some of the major issues of case study research; for example, how to select the case (or cases) that will maximize learning, how to generalize what is learned from one case to another, and how to interpret what is learned from a case. Uniquely, this book legitimizes direct interpretation as a case research method. It covers such topics as the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to case study; data gathering, including document review; coding, sorting, and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher, triangulation; and reporting a case study.

AB - Unique in his approach and style, Robert E. Stake draws from naturalistic, holistic, ethnographic, phenomenological, and biographic methods to present a disciplined, qualitative exploration of case study methods. In his exploration, Stake uses and annotates an actual case, at Harper School, to demonstrate to readers how to resolve some of the major issues of case study research; for example, how to select the case (or cases) that will maximize learning, how to generalize what is learned from one case to another, and how to interpret what is learned from a case. Uniquely, this book legitimizes direct interpretation as a case research method. It covers such topics as the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to case study; data gathering, including document review; coding, sorting, and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher, triangulation; and reporting a case study.

UR - http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/31865831

SN - 9780803957664

SN - 9780803957671

BT - The Art of Case Study Research

PB - SAGE Publishing

CY - Thousand Oaks

• Find My Rep

You are here

The Art of Case Study Research

• Robert E. Stake - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
• Description

Robert E Stake uses and annotates an actual case study to answer such questions as: How is the case selected? How do you select the case which is most likely to lead to maximizing what can be learned? How can what is learned from one case be applied to another? How can what is learned from a case be interpreted? In addition, the book covers: the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches; data-gathering including document review; coding, sorting and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher; triangulation; and reporting.   Introduction An Intensive Study of Case Study Research Methods

This is a very useful resource for students who are evaluating case study research, or who are contemplating this as a methodology for their own research.

I have used a previous edition extensively for my own research. Yin is an essential for all case study researchers. I am delighted to have the new edition. It is a classic.

An excellent text for educator/student research methods using case study as an approach. Written in a way that makes interpretation, understanding and application easier.

This is an essential book for research using a case study approach.

Stake provides a useful step by step guide to case study methods used in qualitative inquiry. The use of workshop scenarios helps cement its application in practice.

A concise book that is so elaborate most especially for early career researchers using case study as an approach. The writing style is simple with detail examples; also the use of foot notes in the book is an “icing on the cake”.

It did not suit the needs of the actual students. This does not mean that the book would be not good - in contrary.

Classic book to go alongside Yin for a different philosophical perspective. Will advise students doing case study to read this.

Great book, essential reading for all research methods modules

This is a classic text and clearly accessible to novice and more mature researchers interested in Case Study Research. Each chapter is well defined and signposts the next chapter.

The art of case study research

By robert e. stake.

• 12 Want to read
• 0 Currently reading
• 1 Have read

Preview Book

My Reading Lists:

Use this Work

Create a new list

My book notes.

My private notes about this edition:

Check nearby libraries

• Library.link

Buy this book

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one ?

Previews available in: English

Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition notes.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 161-167) and index.

Classifications

The physical object, source records, community reviews (0).

• Created April 1, 2008
• 18 revisions

Wikipedia citation

Copy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The art of case study research

1996, Library & Information Science Research

Related Papers

The Canadian Journal of Action Research

Trudie Aberdeen

Evaluation and Program Planning

ashok kumar

rizwan gujjar

Jiaheng Yao

Simon Phelan

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

William M. Runyan

The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Trista Hollweck

mubashar yaqoob

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Marie-Hélène Paré

Modern Language Journal

David E Gray

Jesus eduardo Flores

Annals of Tourism Research

Asli D.A. Tasci

Michael Evans

Adrian Carr

Murilo César do nascimento

Super Kmaleon

Sarah Baloyi

The Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Sri Lanka

rohitha rosairo

DGeanene White

UNICAF University - Zambia

Ivan Steenkamp

Rossad Ferdinand

Yaping Yang

Ponsian P R O T Ntui

special issue: the first-year experience

Fabian Frenzel

Tinashe Paul

Thabit Alomari

mabuta mustafa

Olga Castiblanco

Select your cookie preferences

We use cookies and similar tools that are necessary to enable you to make purchases, to enhance your shopping experiences and to provide our services, as detailed in our Cookie notice . We also use these cookies to understand how customers use our services (for example, by measuring site visits) so we can make improvements.

If you agree, we'll also use cookies to complement your shopping experience across the Amazon stores as described in our Cookie notice . Your choice applies to using first-party and third-party advertising cookies on this service. Cookies store or access standard device information such as a unique identifier. The 96 third parties who use cookies on this service do so for their purposes of displaying and measuring personalized ads, generating audience insights, and developing and improving products. Click "Decline" to reject, or "Customise" to make more detailed advertising choices, or learn more. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Cookie preferences , as described in the Cookie notice. To learn more about how and for what purposes Amazon uses personal information (such as Amazon Store order history), please visit our Privacy notice .

• Politics, Philosophy & Social Sciences
• Social Sciences
• Anthropology

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

The Art of Case Study Research Paperback – 5 April 1995

This book presents a disciplined, qualitative exploration of case study methods by drawing from naturalistic, holistic, ethnographic, phenomenological and biographic research methods.

Robert E. Stake uses and annotates an actual case study to answer such questions as: How is the case selected? How do you select the case which will maximize what can be learned? How can what is learned from one case be applied to another? How can what is learned from a case be interpreted? In addition, the book covers: the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches; data-gathering including document review; coding, sorting and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher; triangulation; and reporting.

• ISBN-10 080395767X
• ISBN-13 978-0803957671
• Edition 1st
• Publication date 5 April 1995
• Language English
• Dimensions 15.56 x 1.12 x 23.5 cm
• Print length 192 pages
• See all details

Products related to this item

Product description

From the back cover, about the author, product details.

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ SAGE Publications, Inc; 1st edition (5 April 1995)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 192 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 080395767X
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0803957671
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 15.56 x 1.12 x 23.5 cm
• 1,115 in Under- & Postgraduate Student Guides

About the author

Robert e. stake.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 78% 14% 2% 2% 3% 78%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 78% 14% 2% 2% 3% 14%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 78% 14% 2% 2% 3% 2%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 78% 14% 2% 2% 3% 2%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 78% 14% 2% 2% 3% 3%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from United Kingdom

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• UK Modern Slavery Statement
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell on Amazon Handmade
• Associates Programme
• Fulfilment by Amazon
• Seller Fulfilled Prime
• Advertise Your Products
• Independently Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• The Amazon Barclaycard
• Credit Card
• Amazon Money Store
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Payment Methods Help
• Shop with Points
• Top Up Your Account
• Top Up Your Account in Store
• COVID-19 and Amazon
• Track Packages or View Orders
• Delivery Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Amazon Mobile App
• Customer Service
• Accessibility

• Conditions of Use & Sale
• Privacy Notice
• Cookies Notice
• Interest-Based Ads Notice

• Find My Rep

You are here

The Art of Case Study Research

• Robert E. Stake - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
• Description
• Author(s) / Editor(s)

Robert E Stake uses and annotates an actual case study to answer such questions as: How is the case selected? How do you select the case which is most likely to lead to maximizing what can be learned? How can what is learned from one case be applied to another? How can what is learned from a case be interpreted? In addition, the book covers: the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches; data-gathering including document review; coding, sorting and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher; triangulation; and reporting.   Introduction An Intensive Study of Case Study Research Methods

This is a very useful resource for students who are evaluating case study research, or who are contemplating this as a methodology for their own research.

I have used a previous edition extensively for my own research. Yin is an essential for all case study researchers. I am delighted to have the new edition. It is a classic.

An excellent text for educator/student research methods using case study as an approach. Written in a way that makes interpretation, understanding and application easier.

This is an essential book for research using a case study approach.

Stake provides a useful step by step guide to case study methods used in qualitative inquiry. The use of workshop scenarios helps cement its application in practice.

A concise book that is so elaborate most especially for early career researchers using case study as an approach. The writing style is simple with detail examples; also the use of foot notes in the book is an “icing on the cake”.

It did not suit the needs of the actual students. This does not mean that the book would be not good - in contrary.

Classic book to go alongside Yin for a different philosophical perspective. Will advise students doing case study to read this.

Great book, essential reading for all research methods modules

This is a classic text and clearly accessible to novice and more mature researchers interested in Case Study Research. Each chapter is well defined and signposts the next chapter.

Preview this book

Robert e. stake.

Professor Stake received his B.A. in Mathematics with a minor in naval science and Spanish from the University of Nebraska in 1950. He graduated with an M.A. in educational psychology in 1954 from this university. In 1958, he received his Ph.D. in psychology from Princeton University. From 1955 to 1958, he was a Psychometric Fellow at the Educational Testing Service. Then, an Associate Professor and Faculty Research Coordinator of the College of Education at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. In 1963, he arrived at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where he assisted Thomas Hastings, Lee Cronbach, and Jack Easley in the... More About Author

Purchasing options

Please select a format:

Order from:

• Buy from SAGE

• Find My Rep

You are here

The Art of Case Study Research

• Robert E. Stake - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
• Description

Robert E Stake uses and annotates an actual case study to answer such questions as: How is the case selected? How do you select the case which is most likely to lead to maximizing what can be learned? How can what is learned from one case be applied to another? How can what is learned from a case be interpreted? In addition, the book covers: the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches; data-gathering including document review; coding, sorting and pattern analysis; the roles of the researcher; triangulation; and reporting.   Introduction An Intensive Study of Case Study Research Methods

This is a very useful resource for students who are evaluating case study research, or who are contemplating this as a methodology for their own research.

I have used a previous edition extensively for my own research. Yin is an essential for all case study researchers. I am delighted to have the new edition. It is a classic.

An excellent text for educator/student research methods using case study as an approach. Written in a way that makes interpretation, understanding and application easier.

This is an essential book for research using a case study approach.

Stake provides a useful step by step guide to case study methods used in qualitative inquiry. The use of workshop scenarios helps cement its application in practice.

A concise book that is so elaborate most especially for early career researchers using case study as an approach. The writing style is simple with detail examples; also the use of foot notes in the book is an “icing on the cake”.

It did not suit the needs of the actual students. This does not mean that the book would be not good - in contrary.

Classic book to go alongside Yin for a different philosophical perspective. Will advise students doing case study to read this.

Great book, essential reading for all research methods modules

This is a classic text and clearly accessible to novice and more mature researchers interested in Case Study Research. Each chapter is well defined and signposts the next chapter.

Preview this book

For instructors, purchasing options.

Please select a format:

• Publication A-Z index
• Browse by subject

• Submit Manuscript

Article citations More >>

Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

has been cited by the following article:

Efforts for Internationalizing Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna (Rmutl) in Thailand in the Asean Era: a Qualitative Case Study

1 International Business Management Program (Faculty of Business Administration & Liberal Arts) , Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, ChiangMai, Thailand

2 College of Integrated Science and Technology at Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, ChiangMai, Thailand

• Conferences
• Special Issues
• Google Scholar
• VIRAL HEPATITIS CONGRESS
• JournalTOCs

Help & Contacts

• Questionnaire

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

The Art of Case Study Research by Robert E. Stake (1995-04-05) Hardcover

• Publisher SAGE Publications, Inc
• See all details

Products related to this item

Product details

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B01JXPSMPC
• Best Sellers Rank: #7,341,425 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books )

About the author

Robert e. stake.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 77% 16% 2% 1% 3% 77%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 77% 16% 2% 1% 3% 16%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 77% 16% 2% 1% 3% 2%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 77% 16% 2% 1% 3% 1%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 77% 16% 2% 1% 3% 3%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Customers say

Customers find the content perfect for research and highly readable and enlightening. They also say the book is written in an engrossing manner.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Customers find the book's content perfect for research, with good examples and an orientation drawn from.

"...lays out case study research in a clear and direct manner, with good examples and an orientation drawn from being perhaps the leading practitioner..." Read more

"...Quite easy to read and provides a great foundation for case study research !" Read more

"...It also discusses the major tasks of analyzing and, interpreting the data gathered from interviews conducted...." Read more

"A good introduction to case study research ...." Read more

Customers find the book highly readable and enlightening.

"...Stake lays out case study research in a clear and direct manner , with good examples and an orientation drawn from being perhaps the leading..." Read more

"... Quite easy to read and provides a great foundation for case study research!" Read more

"... Easy to read , but full of solid tips and practical tools for conducting research on cases of any type." Read more

"...The text offers some good guidance on how to conduct case study research, but it is a little thin on methodology, and a little heavy on intuition..." Read more

Reviews with images

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

Engaging Archaeology: 25 Case Studies in Research Practice

Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research Journal

• Journal Home
• Submissions

More Articles in this Issue

Undergraduate research highlights – spring 2019, establishing a statewide celebration of undergraduate research: history and lessons learned.

The Florida Undergraduate Research Conference (FURC) is an annual multidisciplinary conference that enables student scholars to present their research, network with other students, and attend professional development seminars. FURC has been held since 2011 and has featured more than 2,100 student presentations with participation from a broad array of institutions within the state. Survey data indicate that FURC is the first conference presentation for the majority of participants and that participation in the conference is associated with several positive outcomes. This article describes the history, structure, and planning of the conference and as well provides survey and outcome data that may assist other states and geographic areas as they consider forming their own conferences.

Learning “Scholarship as Conversation” by Writing Book Reviews

The ability of undergraduate students to write for scholarly audiences is contingent upon their capacity to recognize that scholarship is a kind of conversation. For a student, writing an academic book review is a near ideal yet generally underutilized opportunity to learn this lesson. Through analysis of previously published book reviews coproduced with students, the authors identify actionable practices to transform the process of writing book reviews from an undervalued, lone activity into a viable form of undergraduate research. Publishing coauthored book reviews may aid students seeking admission to graduate school and faculty seeking promotion. In the end, writing book reviews with students is an opportunity for faculty and librarians to pass along the important lesson that scholarship is an important, inclusive conversation.

A Peer Research Consultant Program: Feasibility and Outcomes

The authors discuss their study of the Peer Research Consultant (PRC) program at California State University, San Bernardino. During the 2016–2017 academic year, 13 courses, with 853 students enrolled, participated in the PRC program. Program participants completed pre and post-measures assessing demographic information, perceptions of skill level, and perceived gains following program participation. Students who participated in the PRC program showed an increase in overall course grades (M = 3.11) compared to those who did not (M = 2.82; p < 0.05). Similar findings were observed among under-represented minority (URM) students who participated (M = 3.05) and those who did not (M = 2.73, p < 0.05). Program participants reported high satisfaction with the program and improved confidence in skills

Introduction – Spring 2019

Table of contents – spring 2019.

SUBSCRIPTION

SPUR advances knowledge and understanding of novel and effective approaches to mentored undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative inquiry by publishing high-quality, rigorously peer reviewed studies written by scholars and practitioners of undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative inquiry. The SPUR Journal is a leading CUR member benefit. Gain access to all electronic articles by joining CUR.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 26 August 2024

L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study

• Da Yan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-9772 1 &
• Shuxian Zhang 1  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  11 , Article number:  1086 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Language and linguistics

Automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) has been widely applied in second language (L2) writing classrooms in the past few decades. Recently, the introduction of tools based on generative artificial intelligence (GAI) such as ChatGPT heralds groundbreaking changes in the conceptualization and practice of AWCF in L2 pedagogy. However, students’ engagement in such an interactive and intelligent learning environment remains unstudied. The present study aims to investigate L2 writers’ behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement with ChatGPT as an AWCF provider for writing products. This mixed-method multiple case study explored four L2 writers’ behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement with AWCF provided by ChatGPT. Bearing the conversational and generative mechanisms of ChatGPT in mind, data on students’ engagement were collected from various sources: prompt writing techniques, revision operations, utilization of metacognitive and cognitive strategies, and attitudinal responses to the feedback. The results indicated that: 1) behavioral engagement was related to their individual differences in language proficiencies and technological competencies; 2) the participants have failed to metacognitively regulate the learning processes in an effective manner; and 3) ChatGPT ushered in an affectively engaging, albeit competence-demanding and time-consuming, learning environment for L2 writers. The study delivers conceptual and pedagogical implications for educators and researchers poised to incorporate GAI-based technologies in language education.

Introduction

“Engagement defines all learning” (Hiver et al. 2021 , 2).

In second language (L2) writing, feedback, especially written feedback, is one of the most widely applied and researched topics (Hyland and Hyland 2019 ). In the past decades, the focus of relevant research has shifted from the effects of feedback on writing quality (e.g., Nelson and Schunn 2009 ; Dizon and Gayed 2021 ) towards students’ involvement in processing and utilizing feedback (Zhang 2017 ; Ranalli 2021 ). However, due to the multifaceted and dynamic nature of student engagement with written feedback (Han and Gao 2021 ), the body of existing literature suffers from the lack of multidimensional insights into all the aspects of engagement with feedback (Shi 2021 ).

Meanwhile, with the advancement of technologies, automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) has been widely implemented in L2 classrooms as a pedagogical innovation. Researchers have made continuous contributions to expand our knowledge in 1) the effects of AWCF on the quality of writing products (Barrot 2021 ); 2) the interplay of AWCF and classroom instruction (Tan et al. 2022 ); and 3) learners’ perceptions of the utilization of AWCF providers in L2 classrooms (ONeill and Russell 2019 ). Reversely, thorough investigations of students’ engagement with AWCF have been scant (Koltovskaia 2020 ). Furthermore, compared to the bravery to incorporate state-of-the-art technologies in L2 classrooms, there remains a lacuna of research on the students’ engagement with cutting-edge AWCF providers. Since its advent in late 2022, ChatGPT, a conversational generative artificial intelligence (GAI) chatbot powered by large language models (LLM), has evoked heated hype about its impact on language education (e.g., Jiao et al. 2023 ; Mizumoto and Eguchi 2023 ). Specifically, a few pioneering studies have unveiled its strength to outperform its precedents in correcting grammatical errors (Fang et al. 2023 ; Wu et al. 2023 ). Nevertheless, we confronted a dearth of empirical evidence of students’ engagement with AWCF generated by ChatGPT in authentic L2 pedagogical settings.

Against the above backdrops, the study has explored L2 writers’ engagement with AWCF provided by ChatGPT. Theoretically, the research has drawn upon existing studies to reconceptualize student engagement with feedback provided by GAI-based systems. Methodologically, the study adopted a mixed-method multiple case study approach to collect and triangulate data. The paper is significant as it brings new insights into the changes in learning patterns that resulted from students’ exposure to GAI-based feedback providers and the extent to which learners engage with the new environment.

Literature review

Awcf and the potential of chatgpt.

In recent years, the impact of AWCF, the written corrective feedback (WCF) provided by computerized automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools, on L2 writing pedagogy has grown continuously (Zheng et al. 2021 ). Compared to the traditional teacher-fronted WCF, AWCF has been praised by researchers and educators for its: 1) power to alleviate teachers’ and peers’ burden in L2 classrooms (Ranalli 2018 ); 2) empowering effects in augmenting students’ involvement in revision and proofreading (Li et al. 2015 ); and 3) promptness in providing effective feedback (Barrot 2021 ). However, researchers have conflicting perspectives regarding the efficacy of AWCF compared to WCF. On the one hand, technology-enhanced feedback providers or interventions serve as a significant assistant in facilitating teachers or peers in making an accurate evaluative judgment on writing artifacts, particularly in overcoming evaluation biases or inaccuracies (Wood 2022 ; Gong and Yan 2023 ; Yan 2024a ), for example, the choice between lenient or severe judgment (e.g., Jansen et al. 2021 ) or the tendency to use simple heuristics while forming feedback (e.g., Fleckenstein et al. 2018 ). On the other hand, AWCF has constantly been criticized as inferior to human-generated feedback with the relatively restricted abilities of AWE systems to form accurate and comprehensive evaluations of writing artifacts, particularly the more traditional corpus-based systems such as Pigai.com (Fu et al. 2022 ). Hence, there has been a long-standing pursuit to improve AWE systems in providing individualized and effective AWCF for language learners (Fleckenstein et al. 2023 ).

Recently, with the emergence of AI-based technologies such as Grammarly and QuillBot, researchers’ interest shifted gradually. According to existing empirical studies, AI-based AWCF providers outperform the corpus-based systems by a substantial margin in both the feedback uptake and revision quality of L2 writers (c.f., the successful revision rate of merely 60% in Bai and Hu 2017 ; and approximately 70% in Koltovskaia 2020 ). Based on such improvement in performance, the technological advancement would further spur the research and implementation of AWCF providers in L2 writing classrooms.

Since the appearance of ChatGPT, researchers have attempted to adopt it as an AWCF provider for L2 writing with promising results. As evidenced by the comparison between ChatGPT and Grammarly by Wu et al. ( 2023 ), the former offers a further improvement over existing AI-based solutions for correcting grammatical errors. Accordingly, researchers have optimistically prophesied the potential of ChatGPT as a significant assistant for language learners in the future (Jiao et al. 2023 ; Mizumoto and Eguchi, 2023 ). The potential of ChatGPT as a potential AWCF provider is based on: 1) the outstanding performance in providing grammatical and syntactical corrections in an accurate and instant fashion (Steiss et al. 2024 ); 2) the tremendous amount of pre-trained language data that ensures its excellent performance compared to its precedents (Wu et al. 2023 ); 3) the ability to iteratively respond to users’ inquiries for feedback due to the interactional and conversational mechanism of the human-computer interface (White et al. 2023 ; Yan 2024b ); and 4) the verified enhancement from conversational AI-based chatbots as learning assistants in previous studies (Wu and Yu 2023 ).

However, we cannot neglect that ChatGPT has its disadvantages; for example, it could create hallucination , the randomly generated and unverified information (Tonmoy et al. 2024 ). Additionally, since ChatGPT is a conversational chatbot, the quality of ChatGPT-generated feedback is dynamic and subject to the extent to which the learners agentically seek and process the feedback (Yan 2024b ). Moreover, from a student perspective, the effective and ethical use of ChatGPT called for a higher level of AI literacy and corresponding support and scaffolding from teachers or peers, both of which were inadequately possessed or provided at the current stage (Yan 2023 ). Taken together, the effective utilization of ChatGPT in educational settings needs meaningful and successful fulfillment of its potential while controlling the threats and menaces it might bring.

In the pre-ChatGPT era, Ranalli ( 2018 ) has called for an accurate and robust AWCF provider that could interactively answer individual learners’ specific needs and demands. Given the history of the AWCF application and the strength of ChatGPT, the GAI-based system is in the spotlight as a potential problem solver and game changer for the field.

In an era of change, the effects of ChatGPT or similar GAI-based tools on L2 writing still need to be studied. Among all the overheating hype and unfounded fears about adopting ChatGPT in education since its debut, we expect more empirical studies investigating the actual effects of the tool on language learners. As Zhang ( 2017 ) has suggested, students’ engagement with feedback providers is an indispensable prerequisite to benefiting from technology-mediated language learning facilities. Consequently, a study focusing on learners’ involvement in processing and utilizing the corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT would enrich our limited knowledge of AI-mediated language learning (e.g., Tseng and Warschauer 2023 ).

Student engagement with AWCF and relevant empirical research

In L2 research, engagement has been understood as one of the defining features of students’ active involvement in learning (Mercer 2019 ). For L2 writing, engagement is commonly conceptualized as a tripartite meta-construct composing three key components: behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement (Ellis 2010 ; Zhang and Hyland 2018 ; Fan and Xu 2020 ). Specifically, behavioral engagement refers to the learning behaviors (Zheng and Yu 2018 ) and strategical choices in translating the received feedback into a revision (Han and Hyland 2015 ); affective engagement represents students’ emotional and attitudinal responses to the feedback (Ellis 2010 ); and cognitive engagement denotes the extent to which the student cognitively perceives the feedback and the subsequent cognitive and metacognitive operations to process and utilize the feedback (Han and Hyland 2015 ).

In recent years, many studies have investigated the three dimensions of student engagement in pedagogical settings of L2 writing equipped with automated feedback providers. On the one hand, researchers have attributed students’ engagement with AWCF to various factors. In a single case study to examine engagement with Pigai.com in an EFL context, Zhang ( 2017 ) discovers that more teacher scaffolding and pedagogical assistance are needed to facilitate the cognitive engagement of L2 writers learning with AWE systems. In a subsequent multiple case study on engagement with teacher-scaffolded feedback provided by Pigai.com, Zhang and Hyland ( 2018 ) attribute the diversity in learners’ engagement to students’ language proficiency, learning styles, and utilization of learning strategies. As the interest of researchers shifts from traditional AWE systems to AI-based AWCF providers, new perspectives on student engagement emerge. Ranalli ( 2021 ) concludes by observing six Mandarin L1 learners who trust in AWCF quality and credibility and decisively determine engagement. Furthermore, a recent eye-tracking study reveals that feedback explicitness determines student engagement with AWCF provided by Write & Improve (Liu and Yu 2022 ). On the other hand, contradictory voices are often heard from research on the students’ engagement with AWCF. For example, the study by Rad et al. ( 2023 ) betokens the promoting effects of Wordtune, an AI-based writing assistant, on L2 students’ overall engagement. On the contrary, Koltovskaia ( 2020 ) manifests that students’ cognitive engagement with the feedback provided by Grammarly is insufficient, although positive affective engagement was reported after using the tool to support writing.

Despite the prolific insights into students’ engagement with AWCF in L2 writing classrooms, scholars have criticized existing research for neglecting key elements, e.g., overlooking students’ involvement in the revision process (Stevenson and Phakiti 2019 ), and the predominance of an outcome-based approach to studying the quality of writing products (Liu and Yu 2022 ). The present study not only embarks on a comprehensive investigation into students’ engagement but also strives to seek a new conceptual departure in L2 pedagogy in the age of AI. Considering the characteristics of ChatGPT as a potential AWCF provider, there exists a lacuna in our understanding of how and to what extent students engage with the new GAI-based feedback provider.

Conceptualizing engagement with GAI-generated feedback

The rationale to revisit the conceptualization of student engagement with corrective feedback in the context of GAI is posited on the paradox between the alleged positive effects of AWCF providers on writing pedagogy (Fang et al. 2023 ; Wu and Yu 2023 ) and the reported challenges encountered by students to effectively tap the strength of AI in seeking feedback (Yan 2024b ). To frame the decisive factors affecting engagement, Ellis’s ( 2010 ) componential framework for investigating corrective feedback is referred to. According to the framework, student engagement with corrective feedback is influenced by individual differences and contextual factors. Previous studies have generally attributed the individual differences of learners to language proficiency (Zhang and Hyland 2018 ; Ranalli 2021 ). However, for ChatGPT as an AWCF provider, technological competence should be included as a major aspect of individual competence since the interaction with ChatGPT, via iteratively prompt writing and amendments, calls for a higher level of digital literacy (Lee 2023 ; Naamati-Schneider and Alt 2024 ).

The tripartite dimensions within the meta-construct of engagement are developed on top of the body of literature. First, the concept of behavioral engagement is expanded. In the study of Zhang and Hyland ( 2018 ), behavioral engagement is deemed to be students’ behaviors to process feedback, i.e., operation and strategies of revision. However, for the present study, an additional aspect of students’ behaviors is considered, i.e., the actions of writing prompts to seek feedback from ChatGPT. Unlike conventional AWE systems and AWCF providers such as Grammarly, the quality, content, and quantity of feedback provided by ChatGPT rely on the user’s interaction with the GAI-based system through iterative and incremental prompt writing (Yan 2023 ). Second, in line with the work by Koltovskaia ( 2020 ), the present study conceptualizes cognitive engagement as students’ utilization of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in processing AWCF; and affective engagement as students’ emotional and attitudinal responses to the AWCF. The conceptual model of student engagement with ChatGPT-generated feedback is graphically shown in Fig. 1 .

Conceptual model of student engagement with ChatGPT-generated AWCF.

The current study

The study explores L2 writer engagement with AWCF generated by ChatGPT. The following logic guides the research: (1) compared to more traditional approaches to corrective feedback, we are facing a paucity of comprehensive understanding of student engagement with AWCF; (2) compared to AWE systems such as Pigai.com, we have barely any knowledge about how ChatGPT’s unique features, such as its outstanding text generation abilities, interactive and conversational interfaces, iterative feedback generation capabilities, would impact on L2 writer engagement with AWCF; and (3) given that effective use of ChatGPT calls for a higher level of domain knowledge and AI competence, we need to examine how do these individual characteristics influence L2 writer engagement with ChatGPT-generated AWCF. Therefore, the following research question would be answered:

How do L2 writer with varied language proficiency and technological competence behaviorally, cognitively, and affectively engage with AWCF provided by ChatGPT?

Participants

The study’s research site was an undergraduate EFL program at a Chinese university. Students enrolled in this program had to take three writing courses in which formative assessment and technology-enhanced feedback were practiced. Therefore, the students were relatively experienced in learning-oriented assessment practices.

The participants were recruited from a pool of students previously involved in a pilot project investigating the impact of ChatGPT on L2 learners (Yan 2023 ). A purposeful sampling method was applied to select four participants with distinct characteristics in language proficiency and technological competence (Palinkas et al. 2015 ). The sampling criteria included: 1) average performance in four precedent L2 writing assessments, which were adopted from the official writing prompts of Test for English Major band 4, a national level and widely applied test of English proficiency for English majors in China (Jin and Fan 2011 ); 2) average performances in the assessments of two precedent digital humanities courses; 3) interest in the project and self-rated trust in AWCF; and 4) recommendations from co-researchers (from the teaching faculty of the program) based on classroom observation and the analysis of learning artifacts. Originally, a group of 14 students voluntarily participated in the project. However, only 4 students were regarded as qualified participants for the present study since the others failed to provide complete learning data. See Table 1 for the background information of the 4 participants. To maintain the ethicality of the study, written informed consents were obtained from all participants, who were aware of the purpose, design, procedures, and anonymity policies of the study, prior to the data collection procedures.

In second language acquisition (Duff 2010 ) and educational feedback (e.g., Zhang and Hyland 2023 ), case study has been widely applied as an established means to collect rich data on students’ actual learning experiences. Adopting a mixed-method multiple case study approach (Yin 2013 ), a case in the study was defined as the extent to which an individual learner was behaviorally, cognitively, and affectively engaged with ChatGPT-generated feedback. For each specific case, the study followed a convergent design in which the quantitative and qualitative data were triangulated to manifest students’ engagement with the AWCF (Creswell and Plano Clark 2018 ). Furthermore, the study was a collective multiple-case study, as the cross-case comparison of the individual cases allowed the researcher to generalize the findings for a broader context (Stake 1995 ). Although the limited number of participants would possibly hinder the study’s potential implications for a general and broader context, small sample size and/or high drop-out rate are frequent phenomena among case studies on learning behaviors, for example, in Koltovskaia and Mahapatra ( 2022 ), only 2 student participants’ data were selected from a pool of 17; in Yan ( 2024b ), only 3 students were finalized as participants in the inquiry into L2 writer’s feedback-seeking behaviors. As argued by Adams ( 2019 ), the limited number of research subjects in case studies had its merits in unfolding learner experiences in using feedback other than the feedback design.

During the five-week project, 68 students (inclusive of all the participants of the study) joined an L2 writing practicum focusing on exploring the affordance of ChatGPT as a feedback provider. Each week, two sessions of teacher-fronted instruction and live demonstration were prescribed, in addition to four sessions of self-directed learning and practicing. Students must complete draft writing, seek feedback from ChatGPT, execute the revision based on the feedback, and submit it to the instructor each week. To facilitate the data collection, different data collection strategies were employed, i.e., students’ weekly reflective learning journals (Bowen 2009 ), the observation of students’ behaviors in the classroom (Jamshed 2014 ), and the interviews (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). The practicum structure and data collection procedures of the study are shown in Fig. 2 .

Procedures of the study.

First, after each week, the participants were required to complete a reflective learning journal. Specifically, they are asked to provide their weekly reflection on the learning progressions, experiences using ChatGPT for feedback, the episodes of interaction with ChatGPT for eliciting and refining corrective feedback, and the acceptance and rejection of the feedback in preparing the revisions. Participants were encouraged to complete the journal multimodally with multiple types of files, e.g., screenshots, audio recordings, and video clips as supplementary files. See Supplementary Appendix A for the template for the reflective journal. Moreover, a task worksheet was provided to the learners to write down the draft writing, formative revisions, and the final writing products for each writing task. See Supplementary Appendix B for a sample task worksheet.

Second, during each instructional and practice session, the instructors were requested to record the students’ learning behaviors and processes. The students attended all the sessions in language laboratories equipped with keylogging and screen recording facilities to facilitate the recording. All the loggings and recordings were gathered, processed, and taken down in notes by two co-researchers recruited from the teaching faculty. Furthermore, the note-takers coded the notes against a coding scheme for metacognitive and cognitive learning strategies for the study. See Supplementary Appendix C for the coding scheme adopted from the work of Sonnenberg and Bannert ( 2015 ). Inter-coder disagreements were solved by reaching a consensus between the two coders and the researcher through recording playbacks and collective discussion. According to the measurement of Cohen’s Kappa (κ = 0.72, 95% CI [0.65, 0.84]), good inter-rater reliability was attained.

Finally, an immediate post-session interview was performed for each participant after the final session of the week. Participants were required to follow the instructions of the interviewer to answer the questions from the pre-determined interview protocol with questions like “When the project ends, are you willing to continue using ChatGPT for feedback in L2 writing?”. Each interview session lasted for about 10–15 min. The moderator was required to write down all the major viewpoints and interview details in an interview note. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Throughout the data collection processes, the researchers have taken measures to ensure the trustworthiness, reliability, and validity of data. For example, the reliability and validity of the observational data were attained after reaching interobserver agreement during the initial two weeks (Watkins and Pacheco 2000 ); the trustworthiness of the qualitative data were checked with member checking with participants (Doyle 2007 ), and the investigator triangulation (Carter et al. 2014 ).

First, quantified document analysis was applied to analyze the learning journals and the worksheets. For each case, the individual learner’s learning details, i.e., time spent for feedback processing, number of written ChatGPT prompts, time spent for the interaction with ChatGPT, and retention of feedback in the revision, were quantified and analyzed through descriptive statistics. For the coding of prompt writing patterns, a coding scheme developed by the first author in a previous work was used (Yan 2024b ). The coding was performed by three coders recruited from the teaching faculty. According to the measurement of Fleiss’ Kappa (κ = 0.86, 95%CI [0.78, 0.91]), good inter-rater reliability was achieved.

Second, a lag sequential analysis (LSA) using GSEQ 5.1 software was performed to analyze students’ transition and interaction patterns using metacognitive and cognitive strategies extracted from the coded classroom observations. LSA is a statistical technique used to identify patterns and sequences of behaviors or events over time by examining the conditional probabilities of one event occurring after another within a specified time delay or lag period (Bakeman and Quera 2011 ). Correspondingly, GSEQ calculated adjusted residuals from a transitional probability matrix based on the coded behavior sequences (Pohl et al. 2016 ). The significance of behavioral transitions was determined by the Z-score of the adjusted residuals (significant if Z  > 1.96). Behavioral transitions were visualized to present the behavioral patterns in terms of metacognition and cognition within the feedback processing and revision processes.

Third, a thematic analysis following the six-step procedures recommended by Braun and Clarke ( 2012 ) was applied to the interview transcripts. Two additional co-researchers were recruited to assist the researchers in coding and theme extraction. Disagreements among the co-researchers were solved through an ad hoc discussion convened and joined by the researcher.

Finally, when the data analyses were finalized, all findings were converged and triangulated to answer the research questions.

Behavioral engagement

After the quantified document analysis, the data on the participants’ feedback-seeking and revision operations were presented. Specifically, the actions of feedback seeking and revision were respectively manifested as detailed patterns in composing ChatGPT prompts and processing ChatGPT-generated feedback categorized by error types.

First, the actions of feedback seeking by the four participants were shown in Figs. 3 – 6 , respectively. According to the bar charts, Emma and Sophia created more than 2000 ChatGPT prompts in 5 weeks, followed by Robert’s 1670 and Mia’s 1238. Pertinent to the weekly developmental trends in using specific prompt writing techniques, Emma and Sophia have displayed similarities, indicating that the patterns of Robert and Mia were on common ground. For example, in using the [+QUA] technique (providing the user’s quality evaluation of the feedback to re-elicit feedback from ChatGPT), Emma and Sophia have displayed a parabolic curve in the weekly frequencies. At the same time, Robert and Mia have kept a growing momentum to use such a technique throughout the project.

Based on Yan ( 2024 b).

BP: minimal prompt; [+BG]: providing background information; [+TSK]: providing task requirement; [+PER]: providing virtual persona; [+TON]: ask to feedback with ascertain style and tone; [+SPE]: with additional specific demands; [-NAR]: ask to narrow down feedback foci; [+CRE]: ask to check credibility; [+Aff]: provide affective evaluation to regenerate feedback; [+QUA]: provide quality evaluation to regenerate feedback; [!REG]: totally regenerate feedback.

Second, the operations of revision of the four participants were gathered, coded, and categorized by the error types (see Tables 2 – 5 respectively for each participant). The taxonomy of errors was based on the coding instruments developed and used in the work by Ferris ( 2006 ) and Han and Hyland ( 2015 ). According to the results, ChatGPT has provided an average of 11 pieces of corrective feedback for Emma per writing task. Emma performed outstandingly with 74.55% of correct revision and actively used substitutions to correct her errors (14.55%), leaving a relatively limited amount of incorrectly executed revision (1.82%) and a low rate of rejection for correction suggestions (3.64%). Sophia’s performance in revision execution was basically on par with Emma’s (received 12.4 pieces of corrective feedback per task), with a high correction rate (74.19%), a good percentage of substitution (19.35%), and a low rate of correction suggestion rejection (4.84%). Alternatively, Robert and Mia, who have received more than 22 pieces of corrective feedback per task, attained lower rates of correct revision (about 60%) and substitution (≤6.25%), higher rates of incorrect revision (16.5% and 12.5% respectively), correction suggestion rejection (≥6.9%), and deletion (>10%).

Cognitive engagement

The results of the LSA for the participants are displayed in Tables 6 – 9 respectively. In the tables, the leftmost column refers to the starting behavior, while the top row stands for the following behavior in the sequence. The behavior sequence is statistically significant when the corresponding Z value of the adjusted residual is greater than 1.96 ( p  < 0.05). For example, the behavior sequence from planning to feedback seeking is statistically significant for Emma as the adjusted residual is significant ( Z  = 7.483).

The above four tables were visualized diagrammatically (see Fig. 7 for the behavioral transition diagram). Each node in the diagram stands for a category of (meta)cognitive strategies, while a line linking two nodes indicates a significant behavioral transition of the sequence.

P: planning, referring to allocation of time, resources for the following-up feedback and writing processes; M: monitoring, referring to an on-going process in which the quality feedback is observed and compared; E: evaluation, referring to an appraisal of the value and cost for a potential revision or correction based on the feedback selected from the monitoring process; F: feedback elicitation, referring to using the interactive communication with ChatGPT to elicit AWCF; N: feedback refinement, referring to comparing and finalizing potential feedback and ask ChatGPT to regenerate for quality improvement if the quality is unsatisfactory; D: making decision, referring to a final appraisal of the feedback quality and translate the feedback to a potential revision; R: executing the revision, referring to applying the finalized revision to the writing products.

Emma has displayed a relatively higher level of metacognitive regulatory skills. The utilization of cognitive strategies to seek feedback, that is, feedback elicitation and feedback refinement, was integrated with the metacognitive regulations, i.e., monitoring and evaluation. Such integration was characterized by the bidirectional interaction between feedback seeking and metacognitive monitoring (Z F→M  = 16.527; Z M→F  = 12.137), and the similar bidirectional behavioral sequence between monitoring and feedback refinement (Z N→M  = 9.009; Z M→N  = 12.679).

Sophia has demonstrated a similar pattern of utilizing cognitive and metacognitive strategies but in a relatively weaker fashion. Sharing a similar diagrammatical structure, the role of metacognitive monitoring has been reduced, typically in the feedback refinement processes (as indicated by the unidirectional sequence of M → N, Z M→N  = 15.209). However, the role played by metacognitive monitoring during the feedback elicitation processes remained strong (as indicated by the bidirectional behavioral sequence of F ⇌ M, Z F→M  = 18.15; Z M→F  = 3.834).

Contrarily, the diagrams of Robert and Mia were simple and absent of the interweaving between cognitive and metacognitive strategies. In Robert’s case, metacognitive strategies, i.e., monitoring and evaluation, were involved in the learning processes. He was incapable of effectively and metacognitively regulating his learning behaviors, resulting in most of his feedback elicitation and refinement being one-off activities (as indicated by the unidirectional sequences of Z N→M  = 15.633; Z M→E  = 15.126; and Z E→D  = 12.911). Similarly, Mia has failed to integrate cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Compared to Robert, her case was even worse, as the metacognitive monitoring and evaluation were eventually severed from her feedback-seeking and revision behaviors (as indicated by Z N→M  = 8.698; Z N→D  = 9.755; Z M→E  = 10.419; and the disconnection between E and D).

Affective engagement

In the interview, all four participants were invited to express their affective engagement with AWCF provided by ChatGPT. We used four representative quotes to represent the four major themes that emerged from the qualitative data: (1) a beneficial journey; (2) challenges and mental stresses; (3) easier to deal with GAI-generated negative feedback; and (4) continuous usage in the future.

First, students described the overall journey of using ChatGPT for AWCF as a beneficial and interesting experience. Students showcased remarkable trust in the quality of ChatGPT-generated AWCF, especially when their skills at writing prompts increased. Emma described her experiences as a “fun journey.” She was rather satisfied with ChatGPT-generated feedback, as it was of “remarkable quality and great versatility.” Sophia, sharing relatively a large proportion of Emma’s viewpoints, summarized her experiences during the project as a “thrilling journey in a bizarre yet magnificent site.” She reported that the quality of ChatGPT-generated feedback was not always stable yet mostly trustworthy and clear to follow. Robert, seeing his experiences as a “ride on the highway,” was satisfied with ChatGPT as a feedback provider for its promptness and automated workflow. Mia concluded her journey with the project as a “shocking and slow-paced exploration.” She was satisfied with the tool and the learning environment, but not so much with her own progress.

Second, students identified the cognitive challenges they have faced and the resultant mental stresses. A consensus reached by the participants was the logistical issues, particularly the time spent seeking and refining ChatGPT’s responses while using ChatGPT for AWCF. For example, Emma reflected that the processes took her a relatively longer time and were a little bit mentally taxing, as she must “try very hard to seek better prompts that will bring feedback of higher quality and value.” Sophia expressed her desire for more training and scaffolding from teachers since one-on-one conversations with ChatGPT cannot be “sustained with fruitful outcomes.” The feedback-seeking and revision processes were “interesting, rewarding, but challenging” to her, and she was somewhat mentally stressed after using ChatGPT continuously for feedback. Mia explained that the feedback-seeking process was rewarding but hard and took her too much time since she regarded herself as a slow-paced learner. The only exception is Robert, who found that the feedback-seeking processes were “a little bit boring” but not mentally taxing at all since he was confident in his digital competence.

Third, students favored ChatGPT when the tones of AWCF were negative and harsh. Compared to the traditional scenarios, the students were relieved of the shame and “losing face” experience in front of teachers and peers. Emma asserted that it’s much easier for her to accept negative feedback from AI systems than teachers in the classroom. Mia shared a similar feeling that handling ChatGPT-generated negative feedback feels like those from an anonymous agent.

Finally, students expressed their interest in continuously using ChatGPT in the future. On a broader spectrum, the students acknowledge the value and applicability of ChatGPT as an AWCF provider. As Emma remarked, “using AI for corrective feedback will be normal in the future, and the tips and tricks we have explored will be of valuable significance”. Sophia was sure that she would continue to explore the more advanced features of ChatGPT in writing classrooms, but Mia was worried that she would be outperformed by her classmates as she was slow to pick up the more sophisticated tricks and usage. Robert claimed rather straightforwardly that he would be using ChatGPT after the project to “avoid face-to-face feedback from teachers”.

Discussions

The study explored the behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement of L2 writers with corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT in feedback-seeking and revision processes. The findings are categorically presented and discussed in the following sections against existing research and theoretical insights.

Proactive feedback seeking and revision behaviors

The four participants’ behavioral engagement revealed that students were actively involved in the feedback-seeking and revision execution processes. At first glance, all four participants have made progress in seeking feedback from ChatGPT throughout the weeks. Internally, high language-proficiency learners (represented by Emma and Sophia), showed a more sophisticated approach to refining ChatGPT prompts. Instead of repeatedly asking ChatGPT to regenerate feedback, the two learners focused on the quality and content richness of the prompts. The observed varieties could be explained by the process of inner feedback , a term advocated by Nicol ( 2021 ) to represent the natural processing and comparison after learners’ exposure to feedback. Based on the findings, we could infer that the ability to internally process the received feedback during the feedback seeking from ChatGPT depended on the students’ language proficiencies. From another perspective, students’ feedback-seeking behaviors revealed that students with a higher level of technological competence were likely to make more attempts in feedback elicitation and refinement. The specific result was in line with the widely accepted viewpoint that a higher level of ICT competence or digital literacy would lead to more advanced learning outcomes in a technology-enhanced learning environment (Park and Weng 2020 ; Yan and Wang 2022 ).

Similarly, participants with different language proficiencies manifested varied patterns in translating the received feedback to revision execution. Apart from the differences in total errors detected by the AI system per writing task, the most drastic discrepancies among the four participants in the revision operation were the rate of correct revision and adoption of revision strategies. On the one hand, the rate of correct revision was higher than that from precedent research with Grammarly as a feedback provider (i.e., Koltovskaia 2020 ). This could be explained by the alleged strength of ChatGPT in correcting grammatical errors (H. Wu et al. 2023 ). On the other hand, the observation that high-proficiency language learners would make significantly more substitutions than low-proficiency learners echoed the findings of Barkaoui ( 2016 ). However, in contrast with Barkaoui’s ( 2016 ) study, low-proficiency language learners made significantly more revision deletions than their peers. Comprehensively, the students, especially the low-proficiency ones, have ineffectively utilized the corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT. This phenomenon was in line with previous literature (Warschauer and Grimes 2008 ; Chapelle et al. 2015 ).

Diversified metacognitive regulatory skills

Cognitively, the extent to which the participants were engaged with the ChatGPT-generated corrective feedback diversified distinctly. Generally, the students performed unsatisfactorily to metacognitively regulate their learning, especially during the feedback-seeking processes. This phenomenon was in unison with Koltovskaia’s ( 2020 ) study, where the participants failed to process AWCF effectively. Furthermore, the relatively poor metacognitive strategy use also testified to the finding of Zhang and Zhang ( 2022 ) that the AWCF hindered students’ active utilization of monitoring and evaluation strategies. Specifically, higher proficiency learners (represented by Emma and Sophia) have effectively utilized metacognitive monitoring and evaluation of the quality of the received feedback to make full use of the strength of ChatGPT; conversely, the lower proficiency learners (i.e., Robert and Mia) could not effectively integrate the metacognitive strategies with the cognitive processes. The variations in the metacognitive regulatory skills among the participants could be attributed to the view of Zheng and Yu ( 2018 ) that insufficient language proficiency would hinder learners’ ability to process feedback and revision.

Unexpected findings emerged from the comparison of the LSA results between Robert and Mia. Based on the data and the visualization, we could posit that students possessing better technological competence could compensate for their limited abilities to monitor and evaluate the quality of received feedback with intensive communication with AI systems. Such inference underlined the revolutionary affordance of ChatGPT’s conversational AI system in providing a highly customizable and learner-aware environment that satisfies learners’ needs through repeated and creative prompt writing (Ranalli 2018 ; Oppenlaender et al. 2023 ; Rudolph et al. 2023 ). Additionally, the finding was in tandem with the meta-analysis results of Wu and Yu ( 2023 ) that AI chatbots were impactful on learning outcomes. The insights would create a new understanding of students’ feedback processing in a learning environment equipped with GAI-based or conversational tools.

An affectively engaging learning environment

The attitudinal and emotional responses towards ChatGPT-generated AWCF and the new GAI-powered learning environment were mostly positive. The overall satisfaction with and acceptance of ChatGPT as a corrective feedback provider was in line with relevant studies in the field of AWCF (Dikli and Bleyle 2014 ; Koltovskaia 2020 ). Furthermore, participants have agreed that the quality of ChatGPT-generated corrective feedback was reliable and accurate. Compared to previous research on the acceptance and evaluation of AWE systems and tools such as Grammarly, the performance of ChatGPT was convincing and well acclaimed by its users (Zhang 2017 ; Koltovskaia 2020 ; Ranalli 2021 ). This phenomenon could be attributed to the interplay of the computational might of the AI system (Fang et al. 2023 ; Wu et al. 2023 ) and its interactive human-machine interface (Oppenlaender et al. 2023 ).

However, participants stressed the mental effort expenditure that resulted from using ChatGPT in L2 writing classrooms. This was not unexpected, as AWCF providers or AWE systems have always been linked with cognitive overload in previous studies (Ranalli 2018 ; Barrot 2021 ). Nevertheless, the cognitive burden experienced by users of ChatGPT was the aggregate of mental effort expenditure for both feedback seeking and feedback processing. The finding ushered in new insights that would expand our understanding of students’ cognitive load in utilizing feedback for L2 writing. Moreover, the finding was in tandem with a recent research trend beyond the scope of AWCF studies to explore how to effectively compose high-quality ChatGPT prompts (Oppenlaender et al. 2023 ; White et al. 2023 ) and how to develop students’ abilities to communicate with GAI systems (Yan 2023 ; Yan 2024b ).

The multiple mixed-method case study, involving four students with different language proficiencies and technological competences from an EFL program, has explored L2 writers’ engagement with ChatGPT-provided corrective feedback from behavioral, cognitive, and affective perspectives. The findings revealed that: 1) students were behaviorally engaged with ChatGPT-generated feedback; however, their feedback-seeking behaviors and revision operations are highly related to language proficiencies and technological competences; 2) only high language proficiency learners could cognitively engage with ChatGPT-generated AWCF by effectively utilizing metacognitive regulatory strategies; and 3) ChatGPT was well-received by participants as a powerful and affectively engaging AWCF provider.

Adding to the body of literature on students’ engagement with AWCF, the study also focuses on the changes in learning brought about by the appearance of ChatGPT. Noticeably, the research underlines the importance of technological competence for L2 learners exposed to technology-enhanced learning environments. Furthermore, as an initial effort to investigate the patterns of learning behaviors and utilization of (meta)cognitive strategies of L2 writers in a GAI-powered environment, the study offers insights into how students are involved in seeking feedback instead of receiving feedback from AWCF providers and how the feedback processing and revision processes are regulated metacognitively.

The diversity of student engagement with ChatGPT-generated corrective feedback, as manifested by the study, has significant pedagogical implications. First, ChatGPT was not only a powerful rival to its precedents but also an affectively engaging solution with which a new learning environment could be constructed. As a result, the inclusion of GAI-based applications as learning assistants in L2 classrooms should be popularized. Second, teacher scaffolding or instruction on the utilization of ChatGPT for the purposes of L2 writing pedagogy or assessment should be developed and provided. As reflected in the study, learners’ individual ability to metacognitively regulate feedback seeking and revision execution is a far cry from perfection. Hence, support from instructors and peer learners is highly expected. Third, a more rational attitude towards the position of GAI-based products in education should be upheld. Instead of a “silver bullet” or a terminator of education, ChatGPT’s integration in classrooms needs the enhancement of students’ and instructors’ multicompetence and the corresponding restructuring of instructional patterns. Finally, from an L2 learner perspective, the relatively high drop-out rate during the participant recruitment showed that, at least at the current stage, students didn’t possess sufficient AI competence and domain knowledge to effectively utilize GAI for longer-time learning improvement. Thus, sustained efforts should be provided in training students of the contemporary era into better users of state-of-the-art technologies.

The study was not without limitations. First, the study adopted a multiple-case study approach methodologically. Hence, researchers should be cautious when translating or generalizing the findings of the present study to different research settings with larger populations. In follow-up research, alternative research methods could be considered to comprehensively investigate the impact of ChatGPT on a larger number of language learners. Second, the duration of the research is limited. In a five-week project, students have completed merely five writing tasks with limited exposure to ChatGPT. In subsequent studies, researchers could try to conduct longitudinal investigations through which the long-term effects of ChatGPT on the learning behaviors and outcomes of L2 learners could be uncovered. Third, the modes of sources of feedback are limited. The study partially adopted a self-regulated learning style for the participants. Hence, the role of peer learners and instructors in processing the feedback was not examined. In successive inquiries, researchers could introduce collaborative learning or peer scaffolding into the learning environment. Fourth, the impact of ChatGPT-generated feedback on writing of different genres was not studied. In future studies, researchers could delve into the effects of the AWCF provided by ChatGPT on multiple types and genres of writing. In general, with the exhibited potential of ChatGPT as a game changer for language education, the researcher hopes the study could kindle more in-depth insights into the pedagogical practice of utilizing GAI-based applications in L2 classrooms.

Data availability

The pseudonymized data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The raw data are not publicly available due to the concern that they might disclose the privacy of the participants.

Adams G (2019) A narrative study of the experience of feedback on a professional doctorate: ‘a kind of flowing conversation. Stud Contin Educ 41(2):191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1526782

Article   Google Scholar  

Bai L, Hu G (2017) In the face of fallible AWE feedback: how do students respond? Educ Psychol 37(1):67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275

Bakeman R, Quera V (2011) Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017343

Barkaoui K (2016) What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: the roles of task type, second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. Mod Lang J 100(1):320–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12316

Barrot JS (2021) Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy. Comput Assist Lang Learn. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071

Bowen GA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 9(2):27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun V, Clarke V (2012) Thematic analysis. In: APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol 2: research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. APA handbooks in psychology®. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A et al. (2014) The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum 41(5):545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Chapelle CA, Cotos E, Lee J (2015) Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Lang Test 32(3):385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214565386

Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2018) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 3rd edn. SAGE, LA

Dikli S, Bleyle S (2014) Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assess Writ 22:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006

Dizon G, Gayed J (2021) Examining the impact of Grammarly on the quality of mobile L2 writing. JALT CALL J 17(2):74–92. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.336

Doyle S (2007) Member checking with older women: a framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care Women Int 28(10):888–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330701615325

Duff P (2010) Case study research in applied linguistics. Second language acqusition research. Routledge, New York

Google Scholar  

Ellis R (2010) A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Stud Second Lang Acq 32(2):335–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544

Fan Y, Xu J (2020) Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. J Second Lang Writ 50:100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775

Fang T, Yang S, Lan K et al. (2023) Is ChatGPT a highly fluent grammatical error correction system? A comprehensive evaluation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2304.01746

Ferris D (2006) Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In: Hyland, F, Hyland, K (eds) Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues. Cambridge applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007

Fleckenstein J, Leucht M, Köller O (2018) Teachers’ judgement accuracy concerning CEFR levels of prospective university students. Lang Assess Q 15(1):90–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1421956

Fleckenstein J, Liebenow LW, Meyer J (2023) Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Front Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454

Fu Q-K, Zou D, Xie H et al. (2022) A review of AWE feedback: types, learning outcomes, and implications. Comput Assist Lang Learn. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787

Gong H, Yan D (2023) The impact of danmaku-based and synchronous peer feedback on L2 oral performance: a mixed-method investigation. PLoS ONE 18(4):e0284843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284843

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Han Y, Gao X (2021) Research on learner engagement with written (corrective) feedback: insights and issues. In: Mercer, S, Hiver, P, Al-Hoorie, AH (eds) Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters, pp 56–74. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613-007

Han Y, Hyland F (2015) Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. J Second Lang Writ 30:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002

Hiver P, Al-Hoorie AH, Vitta JP et al. (2021) Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Lang Teach Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289

Hyland K, Hyland F (2019) Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In: Hyland, F (ed) Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues, 2nd edn. Cambridge applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.003

Jamshed S (2014) Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J Basic Clin Pharm 5(4):87–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942

Jansen T, Vögelin C, Machts N et al. (2021) Judgment accuracy in experienced versus student teachers: assessing essays in English as a foreign language. Teach Teach Educ 97:103216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103216

Jiao W, Wang W, Huang J et al. (2023) Is ChatGPT a good translator? Yes with GPT-4 As the engine. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08745

Jin Y, Fan J (2011) Test for English majors (TEM) in China. Lang Test 28(4):589–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211414852

Koltovskaia S (2020) Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: a multiple case study. Assess Writ 44:100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Koltovskaia S, Mahapatra S (2022) Student engagement with computer-mediated teacher written corrective feedback: a case study. JALT CALL J 18(2):286–315. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v18n2.519

Lee H (2023) The rise of ChatGPT: exploring its potential in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270

Li J, Link S, Hegelheimer V (2015) Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. J Second Lang Writ 27:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004

Liu S, Yu G (2022) L2 learners’ engagement with automated feedback: an eye-tracking study. Lang Learn Technol 26(2):78–105. 10125/73480

Mercer S (2019) Language learner engagement: setting the scene. In: Gao, X (ed) Second handbook of English language teaching. Springer international handbooks of education, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_40-1

Mizumoto A, Eguchi M (2023) Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Res Methods Appl Linguist 2(2):100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050

Naamati-Schneider L, Alt D (2024) Beyond digital literacy: the era of AI-powered assistants and evolving user skills. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12694-z

Nelson MM, Schunn CD (2009) The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instr Sci 37(4):375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x

Nicol D (2021) The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes. Assess Eval High Educ 46(5):756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314

ONeill R, Russell A (2019) Stop! Grammar time: university students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australas J Educ Technol. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795

Oppenlaender J, Linder R, Silvennoinen J (2023) Prompting AI art: an investigation into the creative skill of prompt engineering. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.13534

Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA et al. (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 42(5):533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Park S, Weng W (2020) The relationship between ICT-related factors and student academic achievement and the moderating effect of country economic index across 39 countries: using multilevel structural equation modelling. Educ Technol Soc 23(3):1–15

Pohl M, Wallner G, Kriglstein S (2016) Using lag-sequential analysis for understanding interaction sequences in visualizations. Int J Hum Comput Stud 96:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.07.006

Rad HS, Alipour R, Jafarpour A (2023) Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: a case of Wordtune application. Interact Learn Environ. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170

Ranalli J (2018) Automated written corrective feedback: how well can students make use of it? Comput Assist Lang Learn 31(7):653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994

Ranalli J (2021) L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: potential for learning and issues of trust. J Second Lang Writ 52:100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816

Rudolph J, Tan S, Tan S (2023) ChatGPT: bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J Appl Learn Teach 6(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Shi Y (2021) Exploring learner engagement with multiple sources of feedback on L2 writing across genres. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758867

Sonnenberg C, Bannert M (2015) Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. J Learn Anal 2(1):72–100. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.5

Stake RE (1995) The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

Steiss J, Tate T, Graham S et al. (2024) Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Eur Res Int 91:101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894

Stevenson M, Phakiti A (2019) Automated feedback and second language writing. In: Hyland, F, Hyland, K (eds) Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues, 2nd edn. Cambridge applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.009

Tan S, Cho YW, Xu W (2022) Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback and their combination mode on EFL learner’s writing performance. Interact Learn Environ. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2066137

Tonmoy SMTI, Zaman SMM, Jain V et al. (2024) A comprehensive survey of hallucination mitigation techniques in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.01313

Tseng W, Warschauer M (2023) AI-writing tools in education: if you can’t beat them, join them. J China Comput Assist Lang Learn. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0008

Warschauer M, Grimes D (2008) Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies 3(1):22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701771580

Watkins MW, Pacheco M (2000) Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. J Behav Educ 10(4):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295615144

White J, Fu Q, Hays S et al. (2023) A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2302.11382

Wood J (2022) Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: a sociomaterial perspective. Teach Higher Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243

Wu H, Wang W, Wan Y et al. (2023) ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on grammatical error correction benchmark. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2303.13648

Wu R, Yu Z (2023) Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Brit J Educ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334

Yan D (2023) Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: an exploratory investigation. Educ Inf Technol 28(11):13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4

Yan D (2024a) Rubric co-creation to promote quality, interactivity and uptake of peer feedback. Assess Eval Higher Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2333005

Yan D (2024b) Feedback seeking abilities of L2 writers using ChatGPT: a mixed method multiple case study. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2023-1933

Yan D, Wang J (2022) Teaching data science to undergraduate translation trainees: pilot evaluation of a task-based course. Front Psychol 13:939689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939689

Yin RK (2013) Case study research: design and methods. 5th edn. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles

Zhang J, Zhang LJ (2022) The effect of feedback on metacognitive strategy use in EFL writing. Comput Assist Lang Learn. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2069822

Zhang Z (2017) Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: a case study. ELT J 71(3):317–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw089

Zhang Z, Hyland K (2018) Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assess Writ 36:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004

Zhang Z, Hyland K (2023) Student engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from reflective journaling and revising practices. Assess Writ 58:100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100784

Zheng L, Niu J, Zhong L et al. (2021) The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: a meta-analysis. Interact Learn Environ. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693

Zheng Y, Yu S (2018) Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: a case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assess Writ 37:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research project is supported by funding from the Young Researcher Program of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University [Grant QN2022049, QN2021033]. We would also like to thank all the anonymous reviewers for the constructive feedback.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Agricultural and Forestry University, Xinyang, China

Da Yan & Shuxian Zhang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Da Yan: conceptualization, data curation, writing—original draft, formal analysis, project administration, writing—review, and editing. Shuxian Zhang: data curation, coding, and writing—review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuxian Zhang .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

At the time of the study, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University had no policy for ethical clearance, nor did it have an ethical committee. Thus, ethical approval was obtained from the School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University in December 2022. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, including existing laws and regulations on personal data, privacy, and research data management.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained via email from all participants before the study in December 2022.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplemental material, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Yan, D., Zhang, S. L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11 , 1086 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y

Download citation

Received : 27 February 2024

Accepted : 31 July 2024

Published : 26 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Sustainable human resource management and employees’ performance: the impact of national culture.

1. Introduction

2. background and hypothesis development, 2.1. sustainable human resource management practices and performance, 2.2. the mediating role of employees’ engagement, 2.3. the moderating role of national culture, 3.1. participants and procedure, 3.2. measures, 3.2.1. individual-level measures (questionnaire), sustainable human resource management (shrm), employees’ engagement, perceived performance, 3.2.2. national-level variable, tightness–looseness scores, 3.2.3. control variables, 3.3. analytic strategy, 3.4. preliminary tests for data quality, tests of hypothesis, 5. discussion, 5.1. theoretical implications, 5.2. practical implications, 5.3. limitations and suggestions for future research, 6. conclusions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Karman, A. Understanding sustainable human resource management–organizational value linkages: The strength of the SHRM system. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2020 , 39 , 51–68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, M.; Luthra, S.; Joshi, S.; Kumar, A. Analysing the impact of sustainable human resource management practices and industry 4.0 technologies adoption on employability skills. Int. J. Manpow. 2022 , 43 , 463–485. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tortia, E.C.; Sacchetti, S.; López-Arceiz, F.J. A human growth perspective on sustainable HRM practices, worker well-being, and organizational performance. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 11064. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Westerman, J.W.; Rao, M.B.; Vanka, S.; Gupta, M. Sustainable human resource management and the triple bottom line: Multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020 , 30 , 100742. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jiang, Y.; Zaman, S.I.; Jamil, S.; Khan, S.A.; Kun, L. A triple theory approach to link corporate social performance and green human resource management. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023 , 26 , 15733–15776. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mazur, B.; Walczyna, A. Bridging sustainable human resource management and corporate sustainability. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 8987. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ansari, N.Y.; Farrukh, M.; Raza, A. Green human resource management and employees pro-environmental behaviors: Examining the underlying mechanism. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021 , 28 , 229–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Swarnalatha, D.C.; Prasanna, T.S. Employee engagement: The key to organizational success. Int. J. Manag. (IJM) 2012 , 3 , 216–227. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schuler, R.; EJackson, S. Human resource management and organizational effectiveness: Yesterday and today. J. Organ. Eff. People Perform. 2014 , 1 , 35–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boselie, P.; van der Heijden, B. Strategic Human Resource Management: A Balanced Approach ; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rayner, J.; Morgan, D. An empirical study of ‘green’workplace behaviours: Ability, motivation and opportunity. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2018 , 56 , 56–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sikora, D.; Ferris, G.R. Critical factors in human resource practice implementation: Implications of cross-cultural contextual issues. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Dev. Manag. 2011 , 11 , 112–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aycan, Z. The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2005 , 16 , 1083–1119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peretz, H.; Knappert, L. The cultural lens. In The Oxford Handbook on Contextual Approaches to Human Resource Management ; Parry, E., Brewster, C., Morley, M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 24–59. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values ; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1984; Volume 5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tarique, I.; Briscoe, D.R.; Schuler, R.S. International Human Resource Management: Policies and Practices for Multinational Enterprises ; Routledge: London, UK, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• DiMaggio, P.J.; Powell, W.W. (Eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis ; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1991; Volume 17. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meyer, J.W.; Rowan, B. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 1977 , 83 , 340–363. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nyamubarwa, W.; Chipunza, C. Debunking the one-size-fits-all approach to human resource management: A review of human resource practices in small and medium-sized enterprise firms. SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019 , 17 , 1–6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Santana, M.; Lopez-Cabrales, A. Sustainable development and human resource management: A science mapping approach. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019 , 26 , 1171–1183. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Poon, T.S.C.; Law, K.K. Sustainable HRM: An extension of the paradox perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2022 , 32 , 100818. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kramar, R. Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014 , 25 , 1069–1089. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stankevičiūtė, Ž.; Savanevičienė, A. Designing sustainable HRM: The core characteristics of emerging field. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 4798. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aboramadan, M.; Karatepe, O.M. Green human resource management, perceived green organizational support and their effects on hotel employees’ behavioral outcomes. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021 , 33 , 3199–3222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stahl, G.K.; Brewster, C.J.; Collings, D.G.; Hajro, A. Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020 , 30 , 100708. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Faisal, S. Twenty-year journey of sustainable human resource management research: A bibliometric analysis. Adm. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• AlKetbi, A.; Rice, J. The Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Employees, Clients, and Organizational Performance: A Literature Review. Adm. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Järlström, M.; Saru, E.; Vanhala, S. Sustainable human resource management with salience of stakeholders: A top management perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2018 , 152 , 703–724. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Florea, L.; Cheung, Y.H.; Herndon, N.C. For all good reasons: Role of values in organizational sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics 2013 , 114 , 393–408. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ehnert, I.; Parsa, S.; Roper, I.; Wagner, M.; Muller-Camen, M. Reporting on sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016 , 27 , 88–108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diaz-Carrion, R.; López-Fernández, M.; Romero-Fernandez, P.M. Developing a sustainable HRM system from a contextual perspective. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018 , 25 , 1143–1153. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mariappanadar, S. A conceptual framework for cost measures of harm of HRM practices. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2013 , 5 , 103–114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bekele, A.Z.; Shigutu, A.D.; Tensay, A.T. The effect of employees’ perception of performance appraisal on their work outcomes. Int. J. Manag. Commer. Innov. 2014 , 2 , 136–173. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vänni, K.; Virtanen, P.; Luukkaala, T.; Nygård, C.H. Relationship between perceived work ability and productivity loss. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2012 , 18 , 299–309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pellegrini, C.; Rizzi, F.; Frey, M. The role of sustainable human resource practices in influencing employee behavior for corporate sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018 , 27 , 1221–1232. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meyer, J.P.; Becker, T.E.; Vandenberghe, C. Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. J. Appl. Psychol. 2004 , 89 , 991. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dixon-Fowler, H.; O’Leary-Kelly, A.; Johnson, J.; Waite, M. Sustainability and ideology-infused psychological contracts: An organizational-and employee-level perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020 , 30 , 100690. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cugueró-Escofet, N.; Ficapal-Cusí, P.; Torrent-Sellens, J. Sustainable human resource management: How to create a knowledge-sharing behavior through organizational justice, organizational support, satisfaction, and commitment. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 5419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boon, C.; Den Hartog, D.N.; Boselie, P.; Paauwe, J. The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: Examining the role of person-organization and person-job fit. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2011 , 22 , 138–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nazir, O.; Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z. Effect of CSR participation on employee sense of purpose and experienced meaningfulness: A self-determination theory perspective. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021 , 46 , 123–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mitra, R.; Buzzanell, P.M. Communicative tensions of meaningful work: The case of sustainability practitioners. Hum. Relat. 2017 , 70 , 594–616. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Glavas, A. Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Front. Psychol. 2016 , 7 , 183377. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chatzopoulou, E.C.; Manolopoulos, D.; Agapitou, V. Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: Interrelations of external and internal orientations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. J. Bus. Ethics 2022 , 179 , 795–817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Kwon, H. The impact of employees’ perceptions of strategic alignment on sustainability: An empirical investigation of Korean firms. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 4180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sroufe, R. Integration and organizational change towards sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 162 , 315–329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, W.; Han, S.J.; Park, J. Is the role of work engagement essential to employee performance or ‘nice to have’? Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 1050. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sopiah, S.; Kurniawan, D.T.; Elfia, N.O.R.A.; Narmaditya, B.S. Does talent management affect employee performance?: The moderating role of work engagement. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020 , 7 , 335–341. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aldabbas, H.; Pinnington, A.; Lahrech, A. The influence of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: The mediating role of work engagement. Curr. Psychol. 2023 , 42 , 6501–6515. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caesens, G.; Stinglhamber, F. The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and its outcomes. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 2014 , 64 , 259–267. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Al-Ajlouni, M.I. Can high-performance work systems (HPWS) promote organizational innovation? Employee perspective-taking, engagement, and creativity in a moderated mediation model. Employee Relations. Int. J. 2021 , 43 , 373–397. [ Google Scholar ]
• Saks, A.M. Caring for human resources management and employee engagement. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2022 , 32 , 100835. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pimenta, S.; Duarte, A.P.; Simões, E. How socially responsible human resource management fosters work engagement: The role of perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment. Soc. Responsib. J. 2024 , 20 , 326–343. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manuti, A.; Giancaspro, M.L.; Molino, M.; Ingusci, E.; Russo, V.; Signore, F.; Zito, M.; Cortese, C.G. “Everything will be fine”: A study on the relationship between employees’ perception of sustainable HRM practices and positive organizational behavior during COVID-19. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 10216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Markos, S.; Sridevi, M.S. Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2010 , 5 , 89. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cesário, F.; Chambel, M.J. Linking organizational commitment and work engagement to employee performance. Knowl. Process Manag. 2017 , 24 , 152–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rich, B.L.; Lepine, J.A.; Crawford, E.R. Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Manag. J. 2010 , 53 , 617–635. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007 , 22 , 309–328. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xanthopoulou, D.; Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.; Schaufeli, W.B. Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J. Vocat. Behav. 2009 , 74 , 235–244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brauchli, R.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Jenny, G.J.; Füllemann, D.; Bauer, G.F. Disentangling stability and change in job resources, job demands, and employee well-being—A three-wave study on the Job-Demands Resources model. J. Vocat. Behav. 2013 , 83 , 117–129. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bakker, A.B.; Hakanen, J.J.; Demerouti, E.; Xanthopoulou, D. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. J. Educ. Psychol. 2007 , 99 , 274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schaufeli, W.B.; Bakker, A.B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 2004 , 25 , 293–315. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lehman, D.R.; Chiu, C.Y.; Schaller, M. Psychology and culture. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004 , 55 , 689–714. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hanel, P.H.; Maio, G.R.; Soares, A.K.; Vione, K.C.; de Holanda Coelho, G.L.; Gouveia, V.V.; Manstead, A.S. Cross-cultural differences and similarities in human value instantiation. Front. Psychol. 2018 , 9 , 366179. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thompson, W.F. Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences ; Oxford Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kroeber, A.L.; Kluckhohn, C. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions ; Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1952. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hofstede, G.; McCrae, R.R. Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cult. Res. 2004 , 38 , 52–88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gupta, K.; McIver, R. Does national culture affect attitudes toward environment-friendly practices? In Handbook of Environmental and Sustainable Finance ; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 241–263. [ Google Scholar ]
• Halder, P.; Hansen, E.N.; Kangas, J.; Laukkanen, T. How national culture and ethics matter in consumers’ green consumption values. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 265 , 121754. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Delle, E.; Mensah, M.E. The influence of national culture on expatriate work adjustment, intention to leave and organizational commitment. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2013 , 5 , 1–8. [ Google Scholar ]
• Delmas, M.; Toffel, M.W. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2004 , 13 , 209–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lammers, J.C.; Garcia, M.A.; Putnam, L.L.; Mumby, D.K. Institutional theory. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods ; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 195–216. [ Google Scholar ]
• Clark, K.; Lengnick-Hall, M.L. MNC practice transfer: Institutional theory, strategic opportunities, and subsidiary HR configuration. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2012 , 23 , 3813–3837. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewis, A.C.; Cardy, R.L.; Huang, L.S. Institutional theory and HRM: A new look. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2019 , 29 , 316–335. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gelfand, M.J.; Nishii, L.H.; Raver, J.L. On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. J. Appl. Psychol. 2006 , 91 , 1225. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harrington, J.R.; Gelfand, M.J. Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014 , 111 , 7990–7995. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Li, R.; Gordon, S.; Gelfand, M.J. Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2017 , 27 , 377–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Uz, I. The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2015 , 46 , 319–335. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Knappert, L.; Peretz, H.; Aycan, Z.; Budhwar, P. Staffing effectiveness across countries: An institutional perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2023 , 33 , 17–46. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zeffane, R.; Al Zarooni, H.A.M. The influence of empowerment, commitment, job satisfaction and trust on perceived managers’ performance. Int. J. Bus. Excell. 2008 , 1 , 193–209. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shah, T.A.; Khattak, M.N.; Zolin, R.; Shah, S.Z.A. Psychological empowerment and employee attitudinal outcomes: The pivotal role of psychological capital. Manag. Res. Rev. 2019 , 42 , 797–817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ochoa Pacheco, P.; Coello-Montecel, D.; Tello, M. Psychological empowerment and job performance: Examining serial mediation effects of self-efficacy and affective commitment. Adm. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chua, R.Y.; Roth, Y.; Lemoine, J.F. The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Adm. Sci. Q. 2015 , 60 , 189–227. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marcus, J.; Aksoy, E.; Tesfa Alemu, G. Perceptions of organizational tightness–looseness moderate associations between perceived unfair discrimination and employees’ job attitudes. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2022 , 53 , 426–445. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schaufeli, W.B.; Salanova, M.; González-Romá, V.; Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002 , 3 , 71–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Riordan, C.M.; Shore, L.M. Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. J. Appl. Psychol. 1997 , 82 , 342. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gelfand, M.J. Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 2011 , 332 , 1100–1104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eriksson, K.; Strimling, P.; Gelfand, M.; Wu, J.; Abernathy, J.; Akotia, C.S.; Van Lange, P.A. Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies. Nat. Commun. 2021 , 12 , 1481. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nakrošienė, A.; Bučiūnienė, I.; Goštautaitė, B. Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. Int. J. Manpow. 2019 , 40 , 87–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Muthén, B.; Muthén, L. Mplus. In Handbook of Item Response Theory ; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 507–518. [ Google Scholar ]
• Snijders, T.A.B.; Bosker, R.J. Discrete dependent variables. In Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling ; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2012; pp. 304–307. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cheung, M.W.L.; Leung, K.; Au, K. Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2006 , 37 , 522–541. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lazarova, M.; Peretz, H.; Fried, Y. Locals know best? Subsidiary HR autonomy and subsidiary performance. J. World Bus. 2017 , 52 , 83–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vandenberg, R.J.; Lance, C.E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 2000 , 3 , 4–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bauer, D.J.; Preacher, K.J.; Gil, K.M. Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychol. Methods 2006 , 11 , 142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.; Sanz-Vergel, A. Job demands-resources theory: Ten years later. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2023 , 10 , 25–53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Latorre, F.; Guest, D.; Ramos, J.; Gracia, F.J. High commitment HR practices, the employment relationship and job performance: A test of a mediation model. Eur. Manag. J. 2016 , 34 , 328–337. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tzafrir, S.S. The relationship between trust, HRM practices, and firm performance. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2005 , 16 , 1600–1622. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Renwick, D.W.; Redman, T.; Maguire, S. Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2013 , 15 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stubbs, W.; Higgins, C.; Milne, M. Why do companies not produce sustainability reports? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2013 , 22 , 456–470. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van den Broeck, A.; Van Ruysseveldt, J.; Vanbelle, E.; De Witte, H. The job demands-resources model: Overview and suggestions for future research. In Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology ; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2013; pp. 83–105. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scott, W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests ; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meyer, J.W.; Greenwood, R.; Oliver, C. Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism ; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 831–852. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jabbour, C.J.; Santos, F.C. The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2008 , 19 , 2133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jabbour, C.J.C.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L. Fundamentals of human resource management for environmentally sustainable supply chains. In Handbook on the Sustainable Supply Chain ; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019; pp. 105–118. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ren, S.; Cooke, F.L.; Stahl, G.K.; Fan, D.; Timming, A.R. Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023 , 62 , 251–265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Peretz, H. Sustainable Human Resource Management and Employees’ Performance: The Impact of National Culture. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177281

Peretz H. Sustainable Human Resource Management and Employees’ Performance: The Impact of National Culture. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177281

Peretz, Hilla. 2024. "Sustainable Human Resource Management and Employees’ Performance: The Impact of National Culture" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177281

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals